Hermine Reuss of Greiz, second wife of Kaiser Wilhelm II, visited and reassured the Kaiser that Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna was alive and well, living in Germany. The Kaiser contributed to her well being.
Watch Jack Otto forbidden knowledge part 1 - 4 and see what the rothshilds elite rockafella bankers and corrupt corperations have done to our country.
Nicholas II was an anti-semitic cunt that murdered 2,000 innocent Jewish people and his pogroms were unjust and evil. He aslo murdered how many thousand workers and their families? He and his family's rightful execution is the perfect blue print for future Revolutions. I only wish it was on tape. Hail Lenin!
@FuckTheWorld623 The jews the 2000 people or so that got killed wasnt his fault. He wasn't at his palace or estate when the killing of the protesters and jews happened he was out of town & one of his elite members ordered the hit to kill the people in the palace square. The russian revolution happened because the jews.jesuits,elite bankers, wanted to control Russia &used propoganda and media that there would be a new better russia & what did u get stalin communist jesuit party. RIP Nicholas II
“I am not prepared to be tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling” Nicholas II of Russia The dude killed jews, murdered 4,000 unarmed protesters, his wife appointed the worst adviser in history, and they were the worst czarists in history. I will admit the people after him enslaved russia, but his incompetence in military cost the lives of millions.
@stevebobcarreli Uh... okay, he might have been guilty of pursuing a war with Japan, in order to take Port Arthur. Now... he didn't order the shooting of the protesters. That's completely wrong. About the Jews... you are half right. The majority of Russia's elite was anti-Jewish, as well as the government and Imperial Family. The government ordered the death of Jews just to get the "loyalty" of the people back on their side. "Politics: the grand pig".
i love the video the romonov family didnt deserve any bad critics or comments just because nicholas II didnt listen to wat was happining in the world poeple accused him of being a bad president i love the romonov family and god bless them all
Why do people romanticize the romanovs. The russians spent centuries under a ruthless monarchy. The czar was a ruthless egomaniac that was completely out of touch with the needs of the russian people.
@milenad888 Why do we romanticize the Romanovs? Perhaps because they were one of the most successful dynasties in the history of the world. When they came to power Russia was in chaos, surrounded by enemies. However out of this chaos led Russia to become one the leading European empires. Between 1898 and 1913 Russia was the fastest growing economy in the WORLD. Nicholas II an egomaniac ? Now that is just complete nonsense.
@milenad888 In one moment people want a firm and strong leader, this necessarily means "strict", the next moment they complain and yell for something else. Then they complain again, so many want a free lunch. This can be taken advantage of by vermin, and it is taken advantage of. When people get what they "wanted" it is most often riddled with suffering, death and disaster in some form or the other.
You try be the leader of a nation in a world of back-stabbers and infiltrators.
AntinouslsGod1: You have no clue about what you speak. He was a good man, perhaps too good, otherwise he would have truly been "bloody" in an attempt to put down the revolutionaries. This title was bestowed upon by Lenin and his bolsheviks, the 'bloodiest' bastards this world has ever seen.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Darling, the Romanovs were some of the worst royals ever in power. Nicholas II was nicknamed Nicholas The Bloody because he was so violent and ruthless.
Your certainly no Monarchist... But Nicholas was a great father, a good man, who simply had to rule at the wrong time.... A pity he and his family suffered so at the hands of those bloody Bolsheviks. Even the saintly Grand Duchess Elisabeth....
Your certainly no Monarchist... But Nicholas was a great father, a good man, who simply had to rule at the wrong time.... A pity he and his family suffered so at the hands of those bloody Bolsheviks. Even the saintly Grand Duchess Elisabeth....
the russian ppl got after his dead the real hell.. the children didnt hv to die.. humans are worst then animals
CioccolatinoSvizzero 2 months ago
i'm reading a book based on his daughter anastasia's diary
mandyfoster6 4 months ago
Hermine Reuss of Greiz, second wife of Kaiser Wilhelm II, visited and reassured the Kaiser that Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna was alive and well, living in Germany. The Kaiser contributed to her well being.
1toscany 5 months ago
Watch Jack Otto forbidden knowledge part 1 - 4 and see what the rothshilds elite rockafella bankers and corrupt corperations have done to our country.
mrfortion408 7 months ago
Nicholas II was an anti-semitic cunt that murdered 2,000 innocent Jewish people and his pogroms were unjust and evil. He aslo murdered how many thousand workers and their families? He and his family's rightful execution is the perfect blue print for future Revolutions. I only wish it was on tape. Hail Lenin!
FuckTheWorld623 9 months ago
@FuckTheWorld623 The jews the 2000 people or so that got killed wasnt his fault. He wasn't at his palace or estate when the killing of the protesters and jews happened he was out of town & one of his elite members ordered the hit to kill the people in the palace square. The russian revolution happened because the jews.jesuits,elite bankers, wanted to control Russia &used propoganda and media that there would be a new better russia & what did u get stalin communist jesuit party. RIP Nicholas II
mrfortion408 7 months ago 2
May the Tsar and his inbred spawn rot in HELL.
Taverner420 9 months ago
Lenin was a great leader and the best member of the Beatles
GotTheStinkyBritches 9 months ago
“I am not prepared to be tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling” Nicholas II of Russia The dude killed jews, murdered 4,000 unarmed protesters, his wife appointed the worst adviser in history, and they were the worst czarists in history. I will admit the people after him enslaved russia, but his incompetence in military cost the lives of millions.
stevebobcarreli 9 months ago
@stevebobcarreli Uh... okay, he might have been guilty of pursuing a war with Japan, in order to take Port Arthur. Now... he didn't order the shooting of the protesters. That's completely wrong. About the Jews... you are half right. The majority of Russia's elite was anti-Jewish, as well as the government and Imperial Family. The government ordered the death of Jews just to get the "loyalty" of the people back on their side. "Politics: the grand pig".
AvatarMarxon90 9 months ago
i love the video the romonov family didnt deserve any bad critics or comments just because nicholas II didnt listen to wat was happining in the world poeple accused him of being a bad president i love the romonov family and god bless them all
397millie 10 months ago
Why do people romanticize the romanovs. The russians spent centuries under a ruthless monarchy. The czar was a ruthless egomaniac that was completely out of touch with the needs of the russian people.
milenad888 11 months ago
@milenad888 Why do we romanticize the Romanovs? Perhaps because they were one of the most successful dynasties in the history of the world. When they came to power Russia was in chaos, surrounded by enemies. However out of this chaos led Russia to become one the leading European empires. Between 1898 and 1913 Russia was the fastest growing economy in the WORLD. Nicholas II an egomaniac ? Now that is just complete nonsense.
ImperialRussianGuard 10 months ago 2
@milenad888 In one moment people want a firm and strong leader, this necessarily means "strict", the next moment they complain and yell for something else. Then they complain again, so many want a free lunch. This can be taken advantage of by vermin, and it is taken advantage of. When people get what they "wanted" it is most often riddled with suffering, death and disaster in some form or the other.
You try be the leader of a nation in a world of back-stabbers and infiltrators.
Kenzofeis 1 month ago
AntinouslsGod1: You have no clue about what you speak. He was a good man, perhaps too good, otherwise he would have truly been "bloody" in an attempt to put down the revolutionaries. This title was bestowed upon by Lenin and his bolsheviks, the 'bloodiest' bastards this world has ever seen.
142Cyril 1 year ago 8
THANX, LOVE THE MUSIC TOO THANX AGAIN
kcrcbest 1 year ago
THANX, LOVE THE MUSIC TOO THANX AGAIN
kcrcbest 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THANX, LOVE THE MUSIC TOO
kcrcbest 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THANX, LOVE THE MUSIC TOO
kcrcbest 1 year ago
THANX, LOVE THE MUSIC TOO
kcrcbest 1 year ago
This is great, Bazhe.
How is your fine book DAMAGES doing? Hope all is well and you are having a Happy New Year.
Sweet Dreams,
Betty
bettydravis 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Darling, the Romanovs were some of the worst royals ever in power. Nicholas II was nicknamed Nicholas The Bloody because he was so violent and ruthless.
AntinousIsGod1 2 years ago
you are right? thanks for educating us.
BAZHE 2 years ago
My pleasure.
AntinousIsGod1 2 years ago
@AntinousIsGod1
Your certainly no Monarchist... But Nicholas was a great father, a good man, who simply had to rule at the wrong time.... A pity he and his family suffered so at the hands of those bloody Bolsheviks. Even the saintly Grand Duchess Elisabeth....
EsIstNurLiebe 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@AntinousIsGod1
Your certainly no Monarchist... But Nicholas was a great father, a good man, who simply had to rule at the wrong time.... A pity he and his family suffered so at the hands of those bloody Bolsheviks. Even the saintly Grand Duchess Elisabeth....
EsIstNurLiebe 1 year ago
@AntinousIsGod1 totally clueless!
1toscany 1 year ago
@AntinousIsGod1 you can t know the trueth. he was good familyman.
SuperEremeeva 8 months ago
Excelente
violeta0011 2 years ago 2
Interesting part of history...Rachmaninoff was a perfect choice...
JuanLorenZerimar 2 years ago 2
i love Rachmaninoff
BAZHE 1 year ago
@BAZHE +1!
spgstr 10 months ago