What is Light? Light is Oscillating Magnetic Lines. New Explanation of Light.

[SidewaysQuark]

LOL this is the most retarded thing I've ever seen BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[philopolymath]

Again close but no cigar...See Walter Russell.."The Secret of Light"...You are on the right track keep up the good work!

[ElectricSparq]

Nice.Better yet,you can choose the "monopole" explanation and we'll understand.

There are no electrons,protons etc.Just monopoles.

Nature likes simple.It's also more efficient that way.

[jethomas5]

Maxwell assumed charges that have no magnetic field. They create magnetic fields when they move. Physicists now agree with you that electrons have inherent magnetic fields because they spin, and most of the magnetism of magnets comes from that spin. I would think you could get them to spin faster or slower, but the consensus seems to be that they have a quantum spin that can't change.

I think your idea has a lot of potential. Have you done the math?

[jethomas5]

I think you are wrong about what Maxwell says. He does not say that electric fields create magnetic fields or vice versa. He says that you will find magnetic fields in space proportional to the change in electric field over time, and vice versa. He says they happen together, not that one causes the other.

So his rules could describe what actually happen. His rules might tend to work even if you are right.

[jc666jc]

music?

please some one help a brother out...its so relaxing

[AnkitMichael]

:)

[13sam31]

Awesome post but something is still missing uniform background radiation at the same temp everywhere is space?? There is some thing out there we are missing. If the radiation was random and at diff temps then it works but it's not

[WinterLights7]

wow nice!

[Licmycat]

Could you come look at my background pix and tell me if they look to be seen in this kind of electric magnetic field? It's a shot of the night sky at a light....I think there is a lot of vibration of that light too. Would that be electricity?

[ftlqed]

So a superconductor should turn light back into magnetism. There's some other force because you could turn the field around and collect a current. So a nano magnet makes interesting carbons. Or a solar collector spins, but the laser just lases. If you smashed a superconductor on a magnet you'd get like a gravity wave, no photon.

[pawnshopr]

sum1 decided to divide by zero and that is why we are here, duh.

[kungfumaster12]

@pawnshopr lol

[svartvist]

In the first place there is no such thing as "lines" either in electrostatics or magnetism. Both are spatial, occupying a volume, and therefore "field" is a more proper term to use. The word "line(s)" was used in the same manner as a specific instance or point in Cartesian coordinates in the Calculus to facilitate representation of observed properties for evaluative purposes.

[compmeist]

The divergence of magnetic field B is zero. It is true that the light photon is associated with the vector potential, and the interconnection of the E and B fields must occur at the level of the very small. There are emitted photons and there are soft photons, each of different character. If there was no polarization of light, then it is possible we would not be here.

[Djole0]

have u wrriten any scientific articles? Did the scientific community approved ur theory? Is it mathematically correct? How can u prove it?

[stan021]

elektromagnetic radiation is a current of photons. photons are particles that moves constantly in vacuum but they stop and has no energy 1000 000 times per second when frequency is 500 kHz. when they have stopped it means that we cannot determine their position, they are everywhere. and when the photon is in maximum peak of energy, then we could determine its position accurately. In my opinion photons sometimes do not "exist" and sometimes "exist". but it is a quantum mechanics....

[willdeburr]

how about talking instead of writing .... ?

[Mayburyj]

I think we went off track when we dismissed the idea of the eather, you still need a medium to store the energy of the travelling wave through a vacuum.

[TookMe20min2findThis]

@Mayburyj

Indeed. Maxwell`s equation are just mathematical formulas to explain the wave`s behavior. I'm still desperately trying to understand what those waves are made of.

A wave is energy displacement of something. What is that something? What are those fields exactly? Fields of what?

Ether has been discarded by some experiments. I guess it would have been too easy to understand..

If anyone can REALLY explain the nature of those fields, be my guest!

[LaEspriella]

Im sure that at the end they are all worng! ja ja ja.

[7sevo7]

Awful & boring. Not a good combination bro. The piano music is a distraction from all of the words that kept appearing.

[atommodel]

electron oscillates when accelerated or decelerated.

[TheConcolor]

But this does not fit with observed data. An electron emits radiation when decelerated, not oscillated. The frequency of the emitted photon depends on the energy released in the deceleration, not in the frequency of an oscillation. How does this idea with magnetic lines account for this? Is it simply an inaccurate illustration in the video, or is it really what the idea says?

[jethomas5]

@TheConcolor

What about radio waves from a radio antenna? Does each electron emit a photon each time it decelerates, or does it emit a radio wave while it oscillates up and down the antenna?

I am not ready to say the video is correct, but I am ready to say that there is more going on than you propose.

[haqi9fly]

i don't know, lets work together to figure it out.

[TheConcolor]

@haqi9fly Cool! I propose we search for scientific articles about oscillating magnetic lines, to see what they have to say about it. (I don't know where else to start since the author of the video did not reply to my question). Are you in?

[RbtV92]

@TheConcolor Well if you think about it, the electron has to decelerate in one direction as it accelerates to move in the opposite direction as described in oscillation. Does this make any sense? Deceleration is still present in the entire system.

[TheConcolor]

@RbtV92 But when the electron descelerates it looses energy (moves slover). The energy of the light that is emitted equals the decrease in energy in an actual light emission process. For the electron to accelerate again it needs an input of energy, such as the absorption of a photon. But this would be a system that alternately emits and absorbs photons (that need to be introduced continually into the system), not an emission of a single photon.

[julianaboulos]

just wondering what the music in the background is? it is good. thanks..

[EGMAG]

if photons are magnetic how come they do not pick up fine metalic particles and drag them along?

[kaderoder]

Ok, could you just run that past me again?

[silvaneyra]

Interesting, but, how do we know that all this information is true? could you recommend us some books to find more, please?

[evangrogers]

@silvaneyra it's an old book, but Paul G Hewitt's Conceptual Physics is a great book - try to find the latest version.

Also, "Physics for Future Presidents" (check out the videos off of a google or youtube search) is a great book that hits upon the info in a very non-mathematical way.

[silvaneyra]

Interesting, but, how do we know that all this information is true? could you recommend us some books to find more, please?

[IcedPhoenix666]

"Phenomenons" is not a word.

[flogger777]

куда вы направелись гаспадин?? небось в горы высокие....нет? а что если....

[kyle3420]

sorry, not electric field, i meant electromotive force. ie. voltage

[kyle3420]

An induced electric field is caused by a change in the magnetic flux. not once did you mention anything about that

[doctordave]

Crackpots do SO love magnetism. Here's a tip, crackpots - MAGNETISM IS NOT A FUNDAMENTAL FORCE. It is a relativistic side effect of moving electrical charges. Using it as a fundamental description of anything is just plain silly.

[TheMeansardine]

fuckin awesome this helps me sleep at night :)

[karioka2]

@TheMeansardine stop writing in this blog, not allowed if u r american,,,...

[TheMeansardine]

@karioka2, you must have been left out of the decision to disclose this information. Otherwise you wouldn't be trying to claim this information for yourself, or for "your kind" it seems you lack confidence in too many people and you saw my response and thought i was just another all consuming, super inflated tard lard "american". I would suggest you think about what provokes you be prejudice towards someone based solely on a video response. your reply seemed frail and desperate man...

[karioka2]

@TheMeansardine lol.. I was just having fun, when I am bored if fun to see how ppl in this damn cyberspace take everything so serious and personal that makes me laugh! ppl really get all disturbed by a fucking comments of someone thet don;t even know! it could even be a computer replying! chill!! I ll keep on reasearching more geek reactions for nothing! lol!

[gamesbok]

@karioka2 Since I got an Interweb in my home I discovered many true facts.  Did you know it was the Chinese who first invented the rainbow?

[Razgrits]

@gamesbok That's like saying someone invented the sun...

[ID345891]

@gamesbok Haha