abiogenesis is not evolution, and evolution is not abiogenesis. darwin's theory says nothing about the origin of life, only what happened after that point. and putting X's over pictures doesnt prove anything other than your own stupiditly/gullability.
The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics that has never been proven wrong. Scientists cannot have it both ways. The second law of thermodynamics is proven to be correct. Evolution lacks any scientific proof.
The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists.
Evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution.This statement is devoid of reason, logic and scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar looking species and claim they evolved one to another. Humans are a great example. There are hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Petrified skulls and bones exist from these creatures. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man.
This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes and elephants. These pictures are placed in all evolutionists' text books to teach kids this nonsense. The picture is simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.
With the aid of genetics we can determine parenthood like in case of who is the father, and also which species are closely related, like evolution predicts.
No evidence exists that contradicts evolution.
This video is nothing but propaganda, devoid of any facts. Adnan Oktar (harun yahya is just a pen name) has no scientific training or experience.
The evolutionist ignores the problem surrounding the human female egg and the male sperm in the evolutionary theory. The female egg contains the X-chromosome and the male sperm contains either an X-chromosome for the reproduction of a male or a Y-chromosome for the reproduction of a female. The female eggs all develop within the ovaries while she is a baby (fetus) within her mother's womb.
Darwin didn't have all the evidence, only a fraction of fossils had been dig out compared to today, and fields of science such as genetics didn't simply exists, but he had enough to form a hypothesis.
And as we know (just look at evidence we have now), evolution has been confirmed from wide variety of independent source, such as palaeontology and genetics. We have transitional fossils, tiktaalik, ambulocetus, odontochelys, etc.
Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous.
I got most of it from Harun Yahya a muslim Turkish scholar which you can find more info about his work from google or youtube and from other muslim scholars such as Yusif Estes
Ah, he has a religious agenda. How unsurprising. It would certainly be interesting to find a genuine, respectable scientist with something to say against evolution. Then maybe people would listen.
abiogenesis is not evolution, and evolution is not abiogenesis. darwin's theory says nothing about the origin of life, only what happened after that point. and putting X's over pictures doesnt prove anything other than your own stupiditly/gullability.
largegrainsofsalt 2 years ago
Chaos From Organization Proves Evolution is Wrong
The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics that has never been proven wrong. Scientists cannot have it both ways. The second law of thermodynamics is proven to be correct. Evolution lacks any scientific proof.
purpose2life 2 years ago
AAAAAH!
This video is made by Harun Yaha?
THAT explains why this video is so full of misconceptions, lies and ignorance!
Harun doesn't even know what a transitional species IS!
Hjernespreng 2 years ago 2
The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists.
purpose2life 2 years ago
oh dear. this video does not explain evolution at all. It mostly contains outright lies.
wiresinlove 2 years ago 2
Evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution.This statement is devoid of reason, logic and scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar looking species and claim they evolved one to another. Humans are a great example. There are hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Petrified skulls and bones exist from these creatures. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man.
purpose2life 2 years ago
This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes and elephants. These pictures are placed in all evolutionists' text books to teach kids this nonsense. The picture is simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.
purpose2life 2 years ago
With the aid of genetics we can determine parenthood like in case of who is the father, and also which species are closely related, like evolution predicts.
No evidence exists that contradicts evolution.
This video is nothing but propaganda, devoid of any facts. Adnan Oktar (harun yahya is just a pen name) has no scientific training or experience.
Saukko31 2 years ago 2
Human Egg and Sperm Proves Evolution is Wrong
The evolutionist ignores the problem surrounding the human female egg and the male sperm in the evolutionary theory. The female egg contains the X-chromosome and the male sperm contains either an X-chromosome for the reproduction of a male or a Y-chromosome for the reproduction of a female. The female eggs all develop within the ovaries while she is a baby (fetus) within her mother's womb.
purpose2life 2 years ago
Darwin didn't have all the evidence, only a fraction of fossils had been dig out compared to today, and fields of science such as genetics didn't simply exists, but he had enough to form a hypothesis.
And as we know (just look at evidence we have now), evolution has been confirmed from wide variety of independent source, such as palaeontology and genetics. We have transitional fossils, tiktaalik, ambulocetus, odontochelys, etc.
Saukko31 2 years ago
Single Cell Complexity Proves Evolution is Wrong
Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous.
purpose2life 2 years ago
I got most of it from Harun Yahya a muslim Turkish scholar which you can find more info about his work from google or youtube and from other muslim scholars such as Yusif Estes
purpose2life 2 years ago
Ah, he has a religious agenda. How unsurprising. It would certainly be interesting to find a genuine, respectable scientist with something to say against evolution. Then maybe people would listen.
debrucey 2 years ago