Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • obama is a beast that is bringing the country down

  • Just impeach the piece of shit!

  • Bill O'Reilly is a self-infatuated pile of stupidity.

    Tax rates are lower under Obama than they were under Reagan. Moreover, Reagan raised taxes eleven times. Is Reagan a socialist?

  • BLAME BLAME BLAME!!! SMOKE AND MIRRORS!! THEY DID IT! NO THEY DID IT! NO WE DIDNT, YOU DID IT!!! NO YOU DID IT!!!

    Meanwhile back at the ranch, the clock ticks ever closer to ZERO

  • @jrsampson2000 And you choose your own fad, which is in vogue.

  • @jrsampson2000 Christianity has given us the west. If you prefer Asian culture or the Middle East you are welcome to give up your citizenship.

  • this is one of the most ridiculous things i have ever seen in my entire life

  • This is nothing new Bill,where the hell have you been?

  • O'Reilly finally waking up to Obama's real agenda? Read articles:

    "Another Democrat rails against the anti-business president"

    "Obama says debt increase ‘a sign of leadership failure’"

    "Debt quotes"

    "More people realizing Obama IS a socialist"

    "With Obama taxes are about ideology not economics"

    "Barack Obama – all you need to know"

    "Obama’s real tax agenda – its not your money"

    "Talk is not so cheap with Obama’s jobs lies"

    "Hypocrite Harry Reid on National Debt Ceiling 2006"

  • Unexpected!

  • Why doesn't he ever give specific examples and go into details.

  • @THEINVENTABLETHREAT Because it's a memo, numb nuts... That piece has only so much time, so he has to limit what he can say. He goes into details during his sit down. Of course liberals are afraid to go on his show, because they know he would bitch slap them off the set. barrack hussein obama would get owned by Bill O'Reilly. Pure and simple. You know it...everyone knows it...that's why that they are cowards and will only go to "news agencies" who will stroke their meat...

  • @SunDevilsCoach You could say some on the left are murderers and it would be a true statement. You could say some on the right are rapists- true. These are blanket statements that means nothing. He says "paying people's bill's" is driving the economic failure, trying to conjure images of lazy welfare recipients, but that only accounts for 7% of the debt. Exactly what "social justice" is he talking about? 40% disapproval rating is the best low disapproval rating of any president in 40 years.

  • Once in awhile this Weasil says something that makes sense.

  • O'Reilly is saying something right. Better make a note of that.

  • @truthforamerica Ha! Ha! CHECK! July 25, 2011 (note to self; watch O'Reilly for sign's of pending mental break down)

  • @truthforamerica Bill is on a roll exposing the left in the last couple of days. Not so concerned about ratings. The anti-Christian bigotry must have ticked him off. Go Bill!

  • @ACORNSUCKS Yeah, cause that really explains why he made some concessions for the sake of the American people and COMPROMISED

    Reed Beeley

  • @TheReedBeeley  I detest Bill O Rally ! I will never vote for any one sponsored by the Tea Party !

  • @freba91 Neither would I. I was trying to point out that Obama actually has some sense and is making compromise, despite the fact that he disagrees with the policy, for the sake of the American people so that a debt limit could be reached and our credit limit could be saved (to an extent). I do not believe Obama to be a 'softy', as some people called John Kerry (which is not a bad thing, by the way. It shows intelligence if you understand another persons logic and then agree).

    Reed Beeley

  • @TheReedBeeley - "I was trying to point out that Obama actually has some sense and is making compromise"

    You a total dip shit. Obama is compromising? When?! WHEN!? When the fuck did he compromise? You're a fucking idiot! You're a total fucking idiot! You're too stupid to remember that Obama never compromised his massive multi-trillion dollar spending spree when the Democrats controlled everything now you're trying to pretend this "shows intelligence"?! Go back to Guitar Hero you dope.

  • @thomaserossi When he gave concessions to the Republicans in the debt ceiling debate. It was this compromise that made some of the democrats mad at him, saying he was too much of a moderate (at least on that issue). And I don't play guitar hero, genius, I play real guitar. Check out my youtube page. It's chock full of my music. I also was not saying this shows intelligence but that the ability to see another side for what it stands for without blocking it out shows intelligence.

    Reed Beeley

  • @TheReedBeeley - No it's not. You're too indoctrinated beyond stupid to understand what makes someone intelligent. Obama voted against the Debt Ceiling when he was a Senator but you're too beyond stupid to figure that out. Your indoctrination is such that you think all compromise is inherently good.

    So just fuck with a condom half of the time. That's compromise! You're a fucking moron. Grow up sonny.

  • @thomaserossi An intellegent person can make a mistake. And by the way, I was talking about the debt ceiling budget deal of 2011, not the one of '06! If you were as intelligent as you claim you infer you are, you wouldn't swear every other sentence, as well as CITING THE RELEVANT YEAR. Indoctrination? It would be the indoctrinated one who rails against anyone who tries to defend Obama any way in the least. Genius, compromise IS politics. Our constitution was created by compromise.

    Reed Beeley

  • @TheReedBeeley "Our constitution was created by compromise." Kindly explain. I'm not American, but to me the US Constitution has always seemed like a pretty radical document for its time. Which aspects do you think were the product of compromise?

  • @hayesism The creation of our bi-cameral legislation, in which there are two houses of congress—one proportional to population and one proportional to state. That was a compromise between the Virginia plan, which called for two houses with representation proportional to population (states with bigger populations got more votes), and the New Jersey plan, which called for one house of legislation with representation proportional to state (each state got an equal vote).

    Reed Beeley

  • @TheReedBeeley Thank you, that's interesting. Although strictly speaking, that isn't really a compromise. A compromise is doing something between X and Y, not doing both X and Y.

  • @hayesism Yes and so it was a compromise. The Virginia plan wanted 2 houses of Congress, with the representation in both houses based on state population. What was created in the compromise was two houses of Congress, however, with only one house with representation based on state population, the other house's representation being uniform to all states (giving each state the same number of representatives). So it really was a compromise.

    Thanks for listening,

    Reed Beeley

  • @TheReedBeeley Interesting again. Thanks!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more