come on! you cant be serious, before the white men all people were black (africans and Indians), it was probably a sort of albino mutation in the Dna that turned a part of the Indians into whiter people, or gave them blue / green eyes. the similarities between Indian and European are too big, both same bone face structure, both straight hair, and both have occurences of green/ blue eyes (specially northern India), only albinos have coloured eyes, Albino Indians today look exactly scandinavians
All Civilizations are related because all Civilizations were founded by White Men.
The original inhabitants of the Middle East, India, China, Japan, and everywhere else that any civilization at all exists, where White Folks. Invading black or brown savages bring down every Civilization.
It does not have a meaning as you may think, my friend. Aum is a very powerful sacred sound because it's mere recitation creates such a positive powerful vibration within the subtle body or energy centers known as chakras. When this sound is properly meditated upon, one will go beyond this material reality and be able to view that everything is consciousness and Aum is the sound that represents such infinite energy. it is very hard to explain. It is beyond any definition.
If you consider a wave, its about repeating patterns(cycles) after a certain interval and within an amplitude. AUM is the sound that very closely imitates a cycle of the primordial sound wave coming from the cosmos. Primordial sound has been detected by radio-physicists as well. Google out for sound coming from black holes. It's a very low note..57 octaves lower than middle-C. When you meditate and your mind becomes quite then only you hear the AUM.
I am not trying to disrespect you, but note that Aum and Amen or Ameen are entirely different. Aum is sanksrit and as you may know, it is phonetic as well, hence, one may experience an alternate reality even when not knowing the meaning due to its vibration the sound causes in one's being. This is why Sankrit, in my view, is the best language. Merely hearing mantras without knowing its mean, still is extremely beneficial to te person. I know when I meditate, I hear AUM wihin my being
@nycballer4life Oh cool, you've read Yogananda's books? That's awesome! I have yet to get started on his books but I hear his biography is awesome. Do you recommend a particular version?
i read a few of yogananda's books but i only know the german titles...what i wanted to say is that yogananda says aum and amen are the same ..so i also disagree with yoganada. peace
I only hear Aum when the meditation session is powerful. It is a great experience and you can literally hear it. Sanksrit was made this way - sounds that were heard during meditation.
Greco-Buddhism, sometimes spelt Graeco-Buddhism, refers to the cultural syncretism between Hellenistic culture and Buddhism, which developed between the 4th century BCE and the 5th century CE
hmmm i strongly disagree with these two men's theory, and also the fact that we got our languages from chimps (Im expressing my views, and I dont follow the popular things in life, so dont give me ur wisdom shit). the writing systems of Sanskrit and Europe orginated from the Aramaic alphabet and Hebrew. thus obviously our mother tongue may have came from the Middle East.
well the west can shit on any other country and then the countries would have to kiss our asses..........so suck it you fuck.......i dont care where we came from or anything as long as we are still on top of the rest.......fuck the middle east
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
oh beyond you ay? do i give a shit about you. ooh clouding up thought space. how can i trust what youre saying? i bet you aint got a shred of evidence, bigot
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
And one more thing, u neo-nazi. I dont give a damn about what you say bout my views. I can believe wat I wanna believe, I dont have to follow the 'acceptance' crowd. And secondly I dont shit on other peoples opinions. Im jus expressin my views. Get a life u bloody racist!
No SERIOUS scientist has claimed that it is, but it is indeed very old and closer to the common root of the Indoeuropean tree than any "modern" language . And it has a very long written tradition, which has proved an invaluable source in clearifying these deep links.
NOT the mother tongue of all tongues - far from it! There are several other linguistic families, which may or may not share a common ancestor with PIE even further back.
Aryan Invasion theory is a british mind game who wanted to divide India as North and South, by maintaining Aryan Invasion theory they tried to put north indians/aryas into their offices by relating them to whites..but Hindu texts were so related that they denied this theory..many kingdoms mentioned in Mahabharata ran into South..and when plan did not work out India was divided as Hindu and Muslim..India and Pakistan( East and West)
dude do not live in any imagination...genetically so called aryan and dravidian races of india has been actually proven to be one,......!! we are natives of India,....and wud be bettter if you see some bbc reports...!invasions never aim for settlement..they aim for looting and invaders cannot settle...genghis khan was invader...he did not settle in europe..but a study shows...66 % europeans have got genghis khan's genes...!
Buddha was born in Ancient India..which was composed of hindu kingdoms whicn ran into present day Nepal..nepal as a totally separate kingdom existed in 1768..and was a kingdom untill 2006..
Before the British came along India was mostly comprised of small Princely States and scattered Kingdoms throughout the Sub-continent. However after the arrival of British and Portugese, India became much of what it is. Of course there were larger kingdoms before their arrival under the likes of Ashoka etc. But Nepal was never part of it, as it was just another kingdom until 1768 under Prithivi Naryan Shah.
There is no Aryan invasion at all and proved beyond doubt by modern researchers.There is nothing to talk on the divides.These are the opinions of last century by British rulers.Now ,it is extremely crystal clear that the migrations to Europe started in India around 5000bc in India.Reliable proofs are there.
As for religion of Bharath is concerned it is called Sanathan Dharma.Persian may be pronounced sindh like Hind.But it may more or less might have been used by muslim rulers.But for majority of people at that time,the religion they followed is Sanathan Dharma only.
Actually Sarawathiputra, I was responding to someone else on the next page. He claimed that the word India came from Greek "indos" which I've never heard of. I agree with most everything you've posted. I apologize for the misunderstanding.
Actually Sarawathiputra, I was responding to someone else on the next page. He claimed that the word India came from Greek "indos" which I've never heard of. I agree with most everything you've posted. I apologize for the misunderstanding.
Indias original name is 'Bharat Varsh' or 'Bharath'.The word 'Hindu' was given by British people according to their understanding of history at that time.We ,Indians followed his line for everything when we have changed for English education.That is all.
Now,one surprising thing in Rigveda itself is,there is no outside referance at all.There is lot of information on the life of people in those days,Aryan Gods details,prayers etc.,but there is no referances beyond Afganistan.Now,only two cases arise.One is,Vedic Aryans were not migrated from outside.Second is ,if migrated,it is now clear that even Rigvedic Aryans also could not remember those things.Really this could take few thousand years.Now,anybody can guess vedic age and antiquity.
One surprising thing in Rigveda itself is,it give many activitites of people at those times, many Aryan Gods details , prayers etc., and no where there is outside referances at all.There is no referance beyond Afganistan.This clearly shows there was no migration from outside or the outside migration happened long before even the Rigvedic Aryans also completely forgotten those things.Probably, this could take few thousand years if happened. Now anybody can guess vedic age and antiquity.
Modern scientific study confirms that Rigvedic descriptions on Saraswathi river is exact and the way the river depicted tally only in 6000bc or before.Again in Mahabharata ,Saraswathi river was clearly shown as shrinking river with pool formations in many places.Through reliable texts and other referances now it is confirmed that the date of Mahabharata was around 3250bc.Combining all this and other referances it can be now shown that Aryans were in Aryavart(India) in 6000bc or before.
Modern scientific study confirms that Rigvedic descriptions on Saraswathi river is exact and the way the river depicted tally only in 6000bc or before.Again in Mahabharata ,Saraswathi river was clearly shown as shrinking river with pool formations in many places.Through reliable texts and other referances now it is confirmed that the date of Mahabharata was around 3250bc.Combining all this and other referances it can be now shown that Aryans were in Aryavart(India) in 6000bc or before.
Now,truth starting to appear from all directions.First ,discovery of dried Saraswathi river by sattellite and elaborate study on the river bed proved that Saraswathi river dried in 1900bc.Experts confirmed That it happened due to tactonic activity and there was large scale migration on all directions.Now it is proved that the abandoned sites are Harappan sites and Harappans are Vedic people.Rigveda expresses Saraswathi as a mighty river larger than the river Ganges and give locations.(contd)
One important thing that is come to light Dear Tre6789, is the disvovery in Arkaim in Russia,i.e.,the discovery of highly advanced Aryan culture sites which belong 4000bc or above.Again in the same area particularly Vedic deities are found.The Russian archeologists confirmed the Aryanic culture entered Russia through Armenia via passing through Persia in that antiquity 4000bc or above.The settlemwnts are from east to west but not otherwise as previously postulated by indoeuropean theorists.
Dear Tre6789,for your question I have given details of Vedic Aryan history(short)with referance from Rigveda and and modern research in the video comments section of Aryan Nations by Parthian warrior.Go through it.
Everything you said was cool. In a scence we have no disagreement. My Issue is Europeans claiming Vedic culture. It is pure folly! Aryan means Noble not Europeans. Herotudus said there where Two Ethiopians Nations one in India and the other in Africa.
The so called Aryan who Europeans are claiming they are not Aryana they are thieves murders and liars. They Invaded the Norhtern section of every country from North Africa past India. They destroyed culture, claimed culture for themselves and created this present skin color issue that still plaugues the world. In Egypt they were called low because of there behaviour.
I have no problem with your info. My point is Sanskrit does not come from europeans. Also as you mentioned there were two traditions the Vedic of the north and the Tantric-Agamic of the south. The revelaers of both where not Europeans-pale blue eyed blond haired people.
I just read the book by S. Oppenheimer "The Real Eve" and according to him, all non-African populations of Asia and Europe can be traced from India to Iran. One group went northward to Centtral Asia and later to East Asia. A second went westward from Iran to southern Europe. The Central Asian branch then went northward to Northern Europe. The only groups of people that called themselves Aryas were Indians and Persians. Perhaps this is where they originated.
It could be true but the orgianl popualtion of India were Aborginals. Remember ancient India was connectred to the Nile valley by the way of the South India. Murgan of South India is still worshipped in diffrent parts of East Africa.
It's true the original inhabitants of India were Aboriginals. They are the current day tribals and live secluded from the rest of the population. They are not Hindus and their language is not similar to either Sanskrit or Tamil. Land mass of South India was connected to Africa millions of years ago.
this is not true!.... indias population is sankrit it has nothing to do with africa...if afirac was connected it was conntected million of million of years ago well before human kind. so i think not. vedic and darivadian are the same culture from the same..it was the white ppl who saw that indians whre either dark or brown therfore concluded that these are two races....oviously white europenas thoguht the lighter you were the more inteligent..this colour of race was never part of indias history.
South culture and life appears to be superior and original. Yes, because it is least affected by foreign invasions as south surounded by sea in three sides.South created great religious thinkers like Adishankara who tried originality of vedic concepts.One can say with more assurance that in South only original vedic concepts are protected what was once existed in Saraswathi and Gangetic river basins..
Another authentic proof is, In south India mostly yajurvedic manthras and agamas are used in temples and other daily rituals.This anybody can verify.Again,many yajurvedic agamic system stated to be used since very ancient times without break.This also any body can verify.These things clearly proves the migrations of people in yajurvedic time which is Harappan period.
Tre6789,Tell me where you have studied your history.Can you give me referance.Try to know real history.The real history is After the drying up of Saraswathi river in 1900 bc ,Vedic people settled in Gangetic plain many of them moved to South India.Now harappan culture proved to be vedic and people left because of drying of Saraswathi river which is Yajurvedic period.That is is time around Sage Agastya also settled in Pothigai malai in Tamilnadu.All facts fit exactly to each other.
First those people before commenting anything try to learn what Vedic culture means and what Vedic Rishis means.They many time considered equal to God.They are such a great persons.They never cared fame, power and lived a simple life totally devoted to God.Their places are called Ashrams which is generally away from the city life.Whereever they went they always contributed to human life, culture and their spirtual upliftment.Ever wisdom they had already nothing to take but only to give others.
My great Tre6789,first study hitory correctly.I am through with Tamil history,know Tamil very well.Sage Agasya,(he belonged to Yajurvedic time )first codified grammar and created disciples like Tholkapiya, the First Tamil grammarian.Thirumoolar also his disciple.Sage Agastya for long time stayed in south.Holy books say,After crossing to South in Yajurvedic time ,he permanently settled and devoted his life time in creating Tamil language.For he effectively utilised the Sanskrit grammar.
We are one family but the Caucasian makes it so hard for this reality to manifest. The Caucasian European race have great people as well and they need to spend more time to research and learn of these people and stop trying to steal and claim the greatness from the Afro-Asiatic people.
Aryans travelled to India in waves in search for warm pastures . Their invasions terminated at the Aravali hills in mid Subcontinent.They named their new homeland Aryavarta.Another branch moved to Iran-Aryan .India is not a Sanskrit name but a colonial address! The true name is Bharat after the clan name of the dominant Aryan tribe.History has been warped by and manipulated by external influences and religious motives.
There is no Aryan race. Aryan means Noble! There are groups of caucasians who inavaded India, the Middle East and North Africa. They invaded Far East Asia also. Any Country when you go to the top the people alot of times have a caucasian look and when you get to the bottom of the land the hue is darker and they look more aborginal!
In Native American writings they make mention the other groups of people, so called Africans-Moors, and Far East Asians who are the predecessors of the European. The Native American Say the older cultures represent the elder brothers.
One can find this pattern from North Africa all through East Asia. However the Dravidians are the originators of the Sanskrit language, Blavatsky with here double standards even knew this. Europeans should take claim for there culture and advancements through the studies of there elder brothers and be happy.
The identifying of Aryans, by their physical features, is don only by an ignorant, who is ruled by his self-proclaimed racial supremacy. The attitude itself reflects his evolutionary status. Humility, recognizing and accepting the TRUTH is the primary requisite in the path of Spirituality. AND when he understands that MAN is but ONE and the world is ONE FAMILY, he can claim to be a Vedic or an Aryan (refined being,).
Race is fundamental to evolution.Spiritualism cannot come from nothing.One family concept is not natural only idealism. Vedic times had a small population in Indo gangetic plains. Vedas emerged under the protected by Kshattriyas who had subdued all others and classified them on racial basis Sanskrit could not have originated with dravidians who are an Afro semetic people over run by the Aryans who came from the Caucuses. Aryan means noble because these people considered themselves to be so.
Sanskrit has no connection with Dravidians .On the contrary it was carried to the Dravidian people by waves of brahmins which influenced their languages immensely in that they have so many sanskrit words.Thousands of years of brahmin domination in south has been rudely terminated by dravidian empowerment that brahmins from south are flooding back to north!
Sanskrit means created language it was created by Aborgianl poople so called Dravidians the proper Names are Tamils, Telgu, Gonds, etc. If you read the Tirumantiram of Tirumular he say that both Tamil and Sansrit are Divine revealed languages. Tirumular was from North India and is a Tamil Rishi of South India.
There is no evidence of Sanskrit beyond Aryavarta ie south of Aravalli till brahmin movement into south. If there is no racial connection why was the northern tract known as Aryavarata.Why are brahmins in south fair and different from the main population stream.There is no trace of Sanskrit among the numerous aboriginese that exist in India known as adivasis.Influence of Sanskrit on Tamil does not mean that it originated in south.South itself was part of Africa
South India was part of Africa millions of years ago. Modern Humans are only thousands of years old. Secondly, there are lots of dark skinned North Indians and fair skinned South Indians. On average, South Indians happen to be darker because they are closer to the tropics.
Dark skinned North Indians are simply the original inhabitants who are in the majority,reduced to the status of shudra etc now renamed as dalits,chamars and so on.Dark north Indians are are only in plains.Kashmir,Himachal Uttarakhand the Himalayan belt does not have dark people at all other than those having moved from plains.The fair in the South are only the brahmins who moved south in days of expansion by Aryans and are being thrown out now by the Dravidian majority.
Dear Mom, South India was not part of Africa millions of years ago. Don't spread ridiculous rumors based on conjecture! I presume you are a white mom. Go stay in a the tropics for a few years and let's see your color when you are back scorched from the heat! :) BTW, R1A gene type is common among all Indians - North or South, and also found commonly in Eastern Europeans. It's the bone structure stupid~!
Again Sanskrit came from the Dravidian Priest. Then caucasians came into india from northern countries and codified a system that was full of abuse and claimed Sanskrit to themselves as a superior language. Alot of Dravidians have been tricked to believed Sanskrit comes from Europeans this is a lie. Dravidian priest revealed Sanskrit. Read what Tirumular says Sanskrit and Tamil are divine langauges. Tirumular is a Rishsi of Shavism-Tamil Shavims.
Well you might say so but we in the north do not believe in this !Explain why Aryavarta was confined only to a small northern tract.Who is this Dravidian priest we dont know.What Tirumular says I dont know but a lot of Rishis moved around and had various backgrounds! Rishis were no historians!Our events were mixed up in mythology than truth and facts.Which is why we have to fall back on western and arabic sources to put our past together!!
I fully respect your opinions, but the truth is Sanskrit as well is Tamil are revealed languages from the divine. One can speculate all they want but, any one who taps into the spirtual system of Sanscrit will see for themselves if the langauge is divine or is from some backward europeans. Sanskrit and Tamil where once spoken in the temples of the south side by side. Tirumular said he recieved this knowledge direct from lord Shiva. I will post it for you next post.
From my studies Tamil was revealed first and Sanskrit came latter. Sanskrit was a created and revealed language and don not forget the Dravidians once populated the north also.
Also the key to decoding India is not Arabic or any other western language. The key is Masters who can teach the spiritual science of Tamil and Sanskrit
Sanskrit gave many European languages there foundation. In the same way Hebrew-Canaanite language gave the Greeks some foundation for there language by the way of letters. The word Aryan means noble it's that simple. There were several European invasions into the northern areas of most eastern countries.
Incocevable that a word should exist by its own without it being linked to a people and their language.Sanskrit was thus someone's language and Arya a word from that. Dravidians are quite different. There is a strong separation between north and south. There is good logic in the racial aspect.Aryans must have come from cold as they worshipped the sun (for different reasons than the Egyptians) and fire (as in Iran)
Interesting video. I'd like to respond to some of the misinformed comments regarding Aryan civilization and the sanskrit langauge. Aryan means noble, cultured follower of Vedic culture, which means understanding that one is eternal spirit (atman) not the temporary material body. Aryan is not a racial term or description of a specific racial group, it means any follower of Vedic culture.
Villages deep in Himalayas still have aryan descendents.Diffrences from other Indians are very clear.Hinduism dveloped by absorption of dravidian occultism and beliefs by nature worshipping aryans.Bhagwat Gita has no mention of Hindus but only kshattriyas!Prussians so to say.
even if there are any aryans left they are probably left in the mountians of northern pakistan. because lots blondes and blue eyes people are found there
Aryan invasions came from north west led by kshattriyas warriors establishing along Sindh-Ganga fertile belt upto Patilaputra today's Patnadefeating advanced dravidian civilisation which forms bulk if India's population.Kept them segragated by caste system which diluted slowly.There is no mention of Hindu in our scriptures.Word is arabic and descriptive no religious!
You may read any of the sanskrit scriptures They do not speak of any Hindu !!This word came to be in use after the invasion by Alexander the Great! Which veda talks of Hindu? Or does the Bhagwat Gita ? it is only the kshattriya who is on the stage or the brahman
Just a minor point, I have it on good authority that "Hindu" comes from an old Persian word meaning "dark" or "thief" , not Arabic. It seems to be an example of the ancient Persian/Subcontinental rivalry where insults tended to get turned into useful words (see use of "deva" in Sanskrit and Persian).
Yes thank you. It must have been so.Which establishes that Hindu is a misnomer and which is why there is no definite direction or cause in this socio entity which is its weakness.But for the philosophy and higher learning exclusive to a few only.Which is why it is exploited.
Yes and some in other Himalayan regions of India too.But BLOND AND BLUE EYED may not be the only criteria since pigments can change due to environment.What matters is the nose,shape of skull ,eyes and texture of skin.TODAYS HINDU SOCIETY IS DEFINITELY NOT ARYAN BUT MORE DRAVIDIAN
u may be rite..even if it was invented in present pakistan tht doesn't make any diffrence. bcoz it was invented thousands of yrs ago, and pakistan used to be part of india..indians lived there
present days indians didn't live there no not at all. Yes pakistan was hindu but the current people of punjab and sindh are the direct decendants of the earliest hindus, not the people from bengal or tamil nadu etc...
oh realy !! what religion they had??i think dravidians were also hindu..and the theory of aryan invasion over india was made up by british to seperate north and south indians..
yep..i think so too..but what religion begalis & tamil belonged to?? as far as i know abt aryan invasion theory that aryan came to india & then they accpeted the hindu religion..dravidian were hindus from begining..tht's wat the theory is..i don't belive in that though
The original sindhis U speak of were Hindus and the current sindhis in Pak are the weak, poor hindus that were and forcefully converted to Islam long time ago. All the hindu sindhis moved to India, the weak ones got converted which reside in Pak.
Yes Bengal is mongoloid dravidian has a lot of occult rituals .South is pure dravidian ,Sindh is Semetic.Nepal and East Himalayas are mongolian Hindu does not describe a race but a larged human congregation which was under Aryan influence once! South India was once a part of Africa!
Thanks for this vedio, You admit our racial connection and sanskrit as the mother of most european languages. I am proud to be an aryan and born in a warrior family of North India.
Well this could be true that sanskrit is mother language. but most west dont agree to that but at least it oldest in IE (indo-europien) faimly of language. So at least eldest bro status is undisputed.again uou can google for it.
Aryan word was coined by MaxMuller(german philospher), he got all vedas & puranas from EIC(East India company). by aryan terms he meant speakers of IE languages. Its not racial thing but certainly its always used that way. Britishes used to divide indians. Hitler used swastika nad aryan word to anihilate jews.
So we NI (North Indian) are native we are not ousider but we are native indian. Vedas puranas are ours saskrit is ours we are cradle of civilization. ltest genetic study prooves that. you can look for Y-chromosoe --> r1a1 and mtDNA --> U2. Latest discoveries like Saraswati river and uder sea city of dwarka cements the fact that we so called Aryan are native indian As India was known as Arya-Vart.
yes, Aryan invasion theory is completely wrong. You can google to see the evidences. It was used to probably divide north indian and south indian people. Truth is all old hindu scriptures are indigenous. Veda's are highest scripturs in hinduism which means knowledge.
You must rethink your conception of language. People were speaking for thousands of years before the ancient Sanskrit grammarians wrote their works. Language changes gradually, and it makes no sense to say that Sanskrit is the oldest Indo-European language: we can only say that it is very close to IE and that we understand it very well. But there were languages before Proto-Indo-European that we will never know because they have left no vestiges in the oldest languages that we can study.
Hey interviewr is less informed. He mentioned Vedas are some thing like OLD TESTAMENT. I guess its other way round.Pls google it and you will see VEDAS are older than OLD TESTAMENT.
Thats why india is called "Cradle of civilization". All peaceful religion are positively influnced by Hinduisim
Dude, I think he means like the old testimant to the new testimant. From the vedas to the modern Hindu books; ie Gita, Mahabarata etc which came thousands of years later. (Rememeber,the Vedas have been scientificly proven to be between 5000-9000 years old) And this film never argues for or against this point. I think you mis-interpreted them.. enjoy!
Well Gautam buddha ( siddarth) was born in nepal- lumbani! and it ends here. Rest like knowladge, speeches and evolution all are done in northern parts of india. so you can decide yourself where budhisim was born. whenever it comes to philoshy and PEACE India stand numro-uno
Well Gautam buddha ( siddarth) was born in nepal- lumbani! and it ends here. Rest like knowladge, speeches and evolution all are done in northern parts of india. so you can decide yourself where budhisim was born. whenever it comes to philoshy and PEACE India stand numro-uno
You do not know anything about Buddha, He was born in India,Beehar, his firs name was Siddhartha Gouthama, he was a hindu prince, he got tired of brahmins and their exploitation of the poor, so he left hindusim and took the old teachings of moksha, which is pre vedic teachings of disappeared indus valley civilisations.
Well i guess google is best resource to provide information. Im sure u bunked history classes in school days to see your boy friend right? Well its pay back time, go and read history book you will find he was born in lumbani,nepal . :-)
It is obvious that the interviewer knows something about the subject but he is trying too hard to control the answers to his own questions, often finishing sentences for Dean Brown.
There is only proto indo-iranian unity in the past. latin , greek and slavic languages were separated from poto indo-iranian at some times in the history. But the proto language and proto culture was only and only indo-iranian in central asia.
so whites are indians too now lol
Steadno 1 week ago
2:51pm Monday (CDT) - Time in M
GelandnaleG 1 year ago
come on! you cant be serious, before the white men all people were black (africans and Indians), it was probably a sort of albino mutation in the Dna that turned a part of the Indians into whiter people, or gave them blue / green eyes. the similarities between Indian and European are too big, both same bone face structure, both straight hair, and both have occurences of green/ blue eyes (specially northern India), only albinos have coloured eyes, Albino Indians today look exactly scandinavians
broadcast040 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All Civilizations are related because all Civilizations were founded by White Men.
The original inhabitants of the Middle East, India, China, Japan, and everywhere else that any civilization at all exists, where White Folks. Invading black or brown savages bring down every Civilization.
CelticSouthland 1 year ago
Does anyone else find Dean Brown's resemblence to Yoda a bit weird?
MrStantonP 1 year ago
You junglebook lovers have smoked too much rotten nirvana grass !
zigsauer 1 year ago
Does anyone even know why AUM ( and its derivates ) considered sacred ?
I would like to know if any indians, can answer it. dont give me bullshit of sacred sound and all.. there is a far more practical meaning to it
dhruv001 2 years ago
It does not have a meaning as you may think, my friend. Aum is a very powerful sacred sound because it's mere recitation creates such a positive powerful vibration within the subtle body or energy centers known as chakras. When this sound is properly meditated upon, one will go beyond this material reality and be able to view that everything is consciousness and Aum is the sound that represents such infinite energy. it is very hard to explain. It is beyond any definition.
vinny1010 2 years ago
@dhruv001
I'll try to answer it.
Kornsk1000 1 year ago
@dhruv001
If you consider a wave, its about repeating patterns(cycles) after a certain interval and within an amplitude. AUM is the sound that very closely imitates a cycle of the primordial sound wave coming from the cosmos. Primordial sound has been detected by radio-physicists as well. Google out for sound coming from black holes. It's a very low note..57 octaves lower than middle-C. When you meditate and your mind becomes quite then only you hear the AUM.
Kornsk1000 1 year ago
wait.. let me guess
Hitler and aryans..
It was the germans who invented sanskrit.. i am sure.. no shit sherlock
nrittam 2 years ago
Kendra, for whatever reason, the author has removed your comments. but for whatever reasons, mine has not.. i wonder why
To answer your question, no on can say where civilization actually originated from,
History is not 2000 years old, when christ was born.
Their secrets are buried, everyone can comment/prove his or her own theory
dhruv001 2 years ago
AUM
Amen
Ameen
nrittam 2 years ago
I am not trying to disrespect you, but note that Aum and Amen or Ameen are entirely different. Aum is sanksrit and as you may know, it is phonetic as well, hence, one may experience an alternate reality even when not knowing the meaning due to its vibration the sound causes in one's being. This is why Sankrit, in my view, is the best language. Merely hearing mantras without knowing its mean, still is extremely beneficial to te person. I know when I meditate, I hear AUM wihin my being
vinny1010 2 years ago
@vinny1010
yes you are right aum and amen are not the same, i read that too i think in the writings of yogananda..amen comes from the egyptian amen ra
nycballer4life 1 year ago
@nycballer4life Oh cool, you've read Yogananda's books? That's awesome! I have yet to get started on his books but I hear his biography is awesome. Do you recommend a particular version?
vinny1010 1 year ago
@vinny1010
i read a few of yogananda's books but i only know the german titles...what i wanted to say is that yogananda says aum and amen are the same ..so i also disagree with yoganada. peace
nycballer4life 1 year ago
@nycballer4life Amen comes from the Egyptian, Amun.
WhiteLotus317 1 year ago
@WhiteLotus317
yes i know
nycballer4life 1 year ago
I only hear Aum when the meditation session is powerful. It is a great experience and you can literally hear it. Sanksrit was made this way - sounds that were heard during meditation.
vinny1010 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Greco-Buddhism, sometimes spelt Graeco-Buddhism, refers to the cultural syncretism between Hellenistic culture and Buddhism, which developed between the 4th century BCE and the 5th century CE
qaplatlhinganmaH 2 years ago
let me guess
they have already hijacked mathematics/calculus/ algrebra/ planetary laws of motion etc, as theirs
Are they going to claim credit for sanskrit ? i wonder.. i wont put past those those spineless bastards.
nrittam 2 years ago
Comment removed
KendraEMoyer 2 years ago
Dont fucking compare egyptian heirlographics , stupid language, with sanskrit grammar
According to tradition, it takes atleast 16 years, to perfect sanskrit grammar
Do you know what BNF is ?
nrittam 2 years ago
Comment removed
KendraEMoyer 2 years ago
You idiot..
where do you think the concept of vowels, verbs originated from
A E I O U.. the vowels. where do think it comes from , you moron..
AUM.. Amen.. Ahem
Do you even know what grammar means
nrittam 2 years ago
Comment removed
KendraEMoyer 2 years ago
and damn shit, where would the whole world be, without the damn fucking white/european race..
nrittam 2 years ago
er. i meant 12 months a year
nrittam 2 years ago
yeah right. 7 days a week/ 12 days a month/
calculus / algebra..
The guitar ( aka sitar ) and music
decimal system. and language grammar
Planetary laws of motion
yeah right,
Damn shit. what would we all non-white ppl have done, without the whites..
Mind boggling .. Oh man.. without the white race, we would be throwing coconuts at each other..
nrittam 2 years ago
Comment removed
KendraEMoyer 2 years ago
2000 years back, indian was like america now. ppl from all over the world , wanted to come to india
and now 2000 years later, america is like that, half way around the globe
who know , what can happen in 2000 years from now
But for sure, if you caucasians ( half asians/half indians) think you are superior, well, its just fate..
Only time will tell, for sure, you idiots
nrittam 2 years ago
Let me guess.. calculus , if you even know what it is , you stupid asshole, is a european finding ?
Not shit sherlock.. Next thing, algebra, decimal system, is all because of fucking white people..
Without the fucking european/white race, we would not even have grammar...
nrittam 2 years ago
India, had the first universities in the world, where so call greek/roman came , to lean mathematics /philosophy and a whole lot of other things
You fucking moron
You think algebra/ hypothogoreas theorem/ calculus/ keplers planetory laws of motion, as european findings ? maybe for you, you stupid moron..
listen to yourstupid white european historians,, they would do you good, to stay in your stupid moronic trance..
nrittam 2 years ago
Tell me, is calculus is a western invention ?
did the great white race invent calculus ?
There were fucking running around naked, while central asia ( india iran etc , part of india ) , were palying chess
nrittam 2 years ago
The aryans were true blooded inidans ( india , as it is now, and iran, persia. )
The germans confiscated a lot of sanskirt litreature.. i sure hope they will give it back to us some day
But you fucking morons, civilization started from india, and spread to europe.. not the other way around
You fucking gora's.. ppl with pale skin, like that of pigs, and manners of pigs ( they eat all kinds of shit )
Dont compare it to real aryan ( aka indian ) culture..
nrittam 2 years ago
bloody fucking hell. History, as you know is , is based on opinion , for sure.
History, is not = algerbra or calculus, as indian invented it..
or not = planetary laws of motions, you stupid morons
Do you think the gerrmans were the aryans?
nrittam 2 years ago
the first and original languages recorded to date originated in east africa, as did all indian culture
KendraEMoyer 2 years ago
The first fucking languages, had no grammar
Where do you thin the BNF form, for modern comp languages originated from ?
Try your best guess
nrittam 2 years ago
hmmm i strongly disagree with these two men's theory, and also the fact that we got our languages from chimps (Im expressing my views, and I dont follow the popular things in life, so dont give me ur wisdom shit). the writing systems of Sanskrit and Europe orginated from the Aramaic alphabet and Hebrew. thus obviously our mother tongue may have came from the Middle East.
-.- western theories are soooo shitty.
FudoMyoofan 2 years ago
well the west can shit on any other country and then the countries would have to kiss our asses..........so suck it you fuck.......i dont care where we came from or anything as long as we are still on top of the rest.......fuck the middle east
pup101 2 years ago
It is an already accepted fact that there is a mother tongue called Proto-Indo-European.
How an asshole like you would like to come out of the shadow and try to go against over 200 years of research is beyond me.
... and go fuck your views, you're just clouding up thought space for a respectable non-digressing professional patient debate
HerrGeneralVonBraun 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh beyond you ay? do i give a shit about you. ooh clouding up thought space. how can i trust what youre saying? i bet you aint got a shred of evidence, bigot
FudoMyoofan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And one more thing, u neo-nazi. I dont give a damn about what you say bout my views. I can believe wat I wanna believe, I dont have to follow the 'acceptance' crowd. And secondly I dont shit on other peoples opinions. Im jus expressin my views. Get a life u bloody racist!
FudoMyoofan 2 years ago
but then again maybe you're right. but still I refuse to think that Sanskrit is the mother tongue of all tongues.
FudoMyoofan 2 years ago
No SERIOUS scientist has claimed that it is, but it is indeed very old and closer to the common root of the Indoeuropean tree than any "modern" language . And it has a very long written tradition, which has proved an invaluable source in clearifying these deep links.
NOT the mother tongue of all tongues - far from it! There are several other linguistic families, which may or may not share a common ancestor with PIE even further back.
ElvenDane 2 years ago
sanskrit is the first language that had the concept of grammar , you idiot
and with it came algebra and calculus, and a whole lot of other things you would not even have dreamed of, as coming from india
dhruv001 2 years ago
whats proto-indo-european ?
And who accepted it ? some european/german scholars ?
dhruv001 2 years ago
I could prove to someone else talking & arguing with an idiot like you is an absolute waste of time.
You're sitting RIGHT in front of a fuckin computer & you have the nerve to ask me "what's proto-indo-european".
What the fuck is wrong with you? Are you that fuckin lazy?
LOOK THE FUCKIN SHIT UP.
Obviously you don't know & completely misunderstood what the fuck it is so you might as well go learn about it.
I took the fuckin time to read and question it. Can't you do that fuckin same?
HerrGeneralVonBraun 2 years ago
Aryan Invasion theory is a british mind game who wanted to divide India as North and South, by maintaining Aryan Invasion theory they tried to put north indians/aryas into their offices by relating them to whites..but Hindu texts were so related that they denied this theory..many kingdoms mentioned in Mahabharata ran into South..and when plan did not work out India was divided as Hindu and Muslim..India and Pakistan( East and West)
Aryas are natives of india.
elfidanto 3 years ago
Dude, invasions happened all the time. Indo-Europeans invaded everywhere, and created many civilizations.
GoebbelsJr 3 years ago
dude do not live in any imagination...genetically so called aryan and dravidian races of india has been actually proven to be one,......!! we are natives of India,....and wud be bettter if you see some bbc reports...!invasions never aim for settlement..they aim for looting and invaders cannot settle...genghis khan was invader...he did not settle in europe..but a study shows...66 % europeans have got genghis khan's genes...!
elfidanto 3 years ago
mostly those Europeans who have genes of Mongol origin are profoundly East Europeans.
FudoMyoofan 2 years ago
Sanskrit-Lithuanian language
bhuda=bunda,buda;bhutis=būtis;Vešpats=Viešpatis;Devas=Dievas;viras=vyras;mata=motė;
sunus=sūnus;duhita=duktė;švašuras=šešuras;dantas=dantis;
ansa=ansa,ąsa;ašru=ašara;padas=padas;javas=javas;madhus=medus;
sanas=senas;asmi=asti;esmi=esti; and so on
discouniverse 3 years ago
Sanskrit came from Brahmi right?
Sunray2live 3 years ago
no i think prakrit..brahmi is a script i think..
elfidanto 3 years ago
So technically Buddha was never born into any of these countries as it didn't exsist then, but the birthplace now lies in modern day Lumbini, Nepal
sacredtantra 3 years ago
Buddha was born in Nepal not India. they also make many false statements that are dangerously untrue.
sacredtantra 3 years ago
Buddha was born in Ancient India..which was composed of hindu kingdoms whicn ran into present day Nepal..nepal as a totally separate kingdom existed in 1768..and was a kingdom untill 2006..
elfidanto 3 years ago
Before the British came along India was mostly comprised of small Princely States and scattered Kingdoms throughout the Sub-continent. However after the arrival of British and Portugese, India became much of what it is. Of course there were larger kingdoms before their arrival under the likes of Ashoka etc. But Nepal was never part of it, as it was just another kingdom until 1768 under Prithivi Naryan Shah.
sacredtantra 3 years ago
Nepal was India b4 Islamic Invasion!!!
Nepal is a HINDU country!!!
srinivasreddymrec 2 years ago 2
ohm, shanti...fascinating dialouge
danplasma 3 years ago
really wanna thank you for posting this very much interesting video on sanskrit language.
neshamah08 3 years ago 2
This is true
ommozy 3 years ago
There is no Aryan invasion at all and proved beyond doubt by modern researchers.There is nothing to talk on the divides.These are the opinions of last century by British rulers.Now ,it is extremely crystal clear that the migrations to Europe started in India around 5000bc in India.Reliable proofs are there.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago 2
As for religion of Bharath is concerned it is called Sanathan Dharma.Persian may be pronounced sindh like Hind.But it may more or less might have been used by muslim rulers.But for majority of people at that time,the religion they followed is Sanathan Dharma only.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago 4
Actually Sarawathiputra, I was responding to someone else on the next page. He claimed that the word India came from Greek "indos" which I've never heard of. I agree with most everything you've posted. I apologize for the misunderstanding.
PKPMom 3 years ago
Actually Sarawathiputra, I was responding to someone else on the next page. He claimed that the word India came from Greek "indos" which I've never heard of. I agree with most everything you've posted. I apologize for the misunderstanding.
PKPMom 3 years ago
Indias original name is 'Bharat Varsh' or 'Bharath'.The word 'Hindu' was given by British people according to their understanding of history at that time.We ,Indians followed his line for everything when we have changed for English education.That is all.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago 7
Now,one surprising thing in Rigveda itself is,there is no outside referance at all.There is lot of information on the life of people in those days,Aryan Gods details,prayers etc.,but there is no referances beyond Afganistan.Now,only two cases arise.One is,Vedic Aryans were not migrated from outside.Second is ,if migrated,it is now clear that even Rigvedic Aryans also could not remember those things.Really this could take few thousand years.Now,anybody can guess vedic age and antiquity.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
One surprising thing in Rigveda itself is,it give many activitites of people at those times, many Aryan Gods details , prayers etc., and no where there is outside referances at all.There is no referance beyond Afganistan.This clearly shows there was no migration from outside or the outside migration happened long before even the Rigvedic Aryans also completely forgotten those things.Probably, this could take few thousand years if happened. Now anybody can guess vedic age and antiquity.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Modern scientific study confirms that Rigvedic descriptions on Saraswathi river is exact and the way the river depicted tally only in 6000bc or before.Again in Mahabharata ,Saraswathi river was clearly shown as shrinking river with pool formations in many places.Through reliable texts and other referances now it is confirmed that the date of Mahabharata was around 3250bc.Combining all this and other referances it can be now shown that Aryans were in Aryavart(India) in 6000bc or before.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Modern scientific study confirms that Rigvedic descriptions on Saraswathi river is exact and the way the river depicted tally only in 6000bc or before.Again in Mahabharata ,Saraswathi river was clearly shown as shrinking river with pool formations in many places.Through reliable texts and other referances now it is confirmed that the date of Mahabharata was around 3250bc.Combining all this and other referances it can be now shown that Aryans were in Aryavart(India) in 6000bc or before.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Now,truth starting to appear from all directions.First ,discovery of dried Saraswathi river by sattellite and elaborate study on the river bed proved that Saraswathi river dried in 1900bc.Experts confirmed That it happened due to tactonic activity and there was large scale migration on all directions.Now it is proved that the abandoned sites are Harappan sites and Harappans are Vedic people.Rigveda expresses Saraswathi as a mighty river larger than the river Ganges and give locations.(contd)
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Very Good info!
Tre6789 3 years ago
Very Good info!
Tre6789 3 years ago
One important thing that is come to light Dear Tre6789, is the disvovery in Arkaim in Russia,i.e.,the discovery of highly advanced Aryan culture sites which belong 4000bc or above.Again in the same area particularly Vedic deities are found.The Russian archeologists confirmed the Aryanic culture entered Russia through Armenia via passing through Persia in that antiquity 4000bc or above.The settlemwnts are from east to west but not otherwise as previously postulated by indoeuropean theorists.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Dear Tre6789,for your question I have given details of Vedic Aryan history(short)with referance from Rigveda and and modern research in the video comments section of Aryan Nations by Parthian warrior.Go through it.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Everything you said was cool. In a scence we have no disagreement. My Issue is Europeans claiming Vedic culture. It is pure folly! Aryan means Noble not Europeans. Herotudus said there where Two Ethiopians Nations one in India and the other in Africa.
Tre6789 3 years ago
The so called Aryan who Europeans are claiming they are not Aryana they are thieves murders and liars. They Invaded the Norhtern section of every country from North Africa past India. They destroyed culture, claimed culture for themselves and created this present skin color issue that still plaugues the world. In Egypt they were called low because of there behaviour.
Tre6789 3 years ago
corection:Every wisdom they had already nothing to take but only give others.
The real history is,after the drying up of Saraswathi river in 1900 bc,Vedic people settled in Gangetic plain.Many of them also moved to South India.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
I have no problem with your info. My point is Sanskrit does not come from europeans. Also as you mentioned there were two traditions the Vedic of the north and the Tantric-Agamic of the south. The revelaers of both where not Europeans-pale blue eyed blond haired people.
dre6789 3 years ago
Who are the vedic people? Can you give a deffention? where they alredy in India or did they come from Europe?
Tre6789 3 years ago
I just read the book by S. Oppenheimer "The Real Eve" and according to him, all non-African populations of Asia and Europe can be traced from India to Iran. One group went northward to Centtral Asia and later to East Asia. A second went westward from Iran to southern Europe. The Central Asian branch then went northward to Northern Europe. The only groups of people that called themselves Aryas were Indians and Persians. Perhaps this is where they originated.
PKPMom 3 years ago
It could be true but the orgianl popualtion of India were Aborginals. Remember ancient India was connectred to the Nile valley by the way of the South India. Murgan of South India is still worshipped in diffrent parts of East Africa.
Tre6789 3 years ago
The Vedas have reffrences of holy places that our in East Africa today. Reference-Arican pressence in early Asia Runoko Rashidi.
Tre6789 3 years ago
It's true the original inhabitants of India were Aboriginals. They are the current day tribals and live secluded from the rest of the population. They are not Hindus and their language is not similar to either Sanskrit or Tamil. Land mass of South India was connected to Africa millions of years ago.
PKPMom 3 years ago
this is not true!.... indias population is sankrit it has nothing to do with africa...if afirac was connected it was conntected million of million of years ago well before human kind. so i think not. vedic and darivadian are the same culture from the same..it was the white ppl who saw that indians whre either dark or brown therfore concluded that these are two races....oviously white europenas thoguht the lighter you were the more inteligent..this colour of race was never part of indias history.
URbloodMYfist 2 years ago
Ha, we all came out of Africa, if you go back far enough in time :-)
Nothing wrong with that - the gene trails and the fossil finds clearly demonstrate this.
Yes, those whites were stupid and ignorant, thinking they were at the top :-)
At least we have moved on since then LOL
ElvenDane 2 years ago
This is true
argudit 3 years ago
South culture and life appears to be superior and original. Yes, because it is least affected by foreign invasions as south surounded by sea in three sides.South created great religious thinkers like Adishankara who tried originality of vedic concepts.One can say with more assurance that in South only original vedic concepts are protected what was once existed in Saraswathi and Gangetic river basins..
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Another authentic proof is, In south India mostly yajurvedic manthras and agamas are used in temples and other daily rituals.This anybody can verify.Again,many yajurvedic agamic system stated to be used since very ancient times without break.This also any body can verify.These things clearly proves the migrations of people in yajurvedic time which is Harappan period.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
Tre6789,Tell me where you have studied your history.Can you give me referance.Try to know real history.The real history is After the drying up of Saraswathi river in 1900 bc ,Vedic people settled in Gangetic plain many of them moved to South India.Now harappan culture proved to be vedic and people left because of drying of Saraswathi river which is Yajurvedic period.That is is time around Sage Agastya also settled in Pothigai malai in Tamilnadu.All facts fit exactly to each other.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
First those people before commenting anything try to learn what Vedic culture means and what Vedic Rishis means.They many time considered equal to God.They are such a great persons.They never cared fame, power and lived a simple life totally devoted to God.Their places are called Ashrams which is generally away from the city life.Whereever they went they always contributed to human life, culture and their spirtual upliftment.Ever wisdom they had already nothing to take but only to give others.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
My great Tre6789,first study hitory correctly.I am through with Tamil history,know Tamil very well.Sage Agasya,(he belonged to Yajurvedic time )first codified grammar and created disciples like Tholkapiya, the First Tamil grammarian.Thirumoolar also his disciple.Sage Agastya for long time stayed in south.Holy books say,After crossing to South in Yajurvedic time ,he permanently settled and devoted his life time in creating Tamil language.For he effectively utilised the Sanskrit grammar.
Saraswathiputra 3 years ago
is it just me or is the guy hosting the show a little strange?
krish108 4 years ago
I love this series, can you post more please
ss11s 4 years ago
We are one family but the Caucasian makes it so hard for this reality to manifest. The Caucasian European race have great people as well and they need to spend more time to research and learn of these people and stop trying to steal and claim the greatness from the Afro-Asiatic people.
Tre6789 4 years ago
Aryans travelled to India in waves in search for warm pastures . Their invasions terminated at the Aravali hills in mid Subcontinent.They named their new homeland Aryavarta.Another branch moved to Iran-Aryan .India is not a Sanskrit name but a colonial address! The true name is Bharat after the clan name of the dominant Aryan tribe.History has been warped by and manipulated by external influences and religious motives.
argudit 3 years ago
There is no Aryan race. Aryan means Noble! There are groups of caucasians who inavaded India, the Middle East and North Africa. They invaded Far East Asia also. Any Country when you go to the top the people alot of times have a caucasian look and when you get to the bottom of the land the hue is darker and they look more aborginal!
Tre6789 3 years ago
when u say that aryans invaded u are assuming that there were civilisations existing...
msdhoni 3 years ago
In Native American writings they make mention the other groups of people, so called Africans-Moors, and Far East Asians who are the predecessors of the European. The Native American Say the older cultures represent the elder brothers.
Tre6789 4 years ago
One can find this pattern from North Africa all through East Asia. However the Dravidians are the originators of the Sanskrit language, Blavatsky with here double standards even knew this. Europeans should take claim for there culture and advancements through the studies of there elder brothers and be happy.
Tre6789 4 years ago
The identifying of Aryans, by their physical features, is don only by an ignorant, who is ruled by his self-proclaimed racial supremacy. The attitude itself reflects his evolutionary status. Humility, recognizing and accepting the TRUTH is the primary requisite in the path of Spirituality. AND when he understands that MAN is but ONE and the world is ONE FAMILY, he can claim to be a Vedic or an Aryan (refined being,).
brainlaundry 3 years ago
Race is fundamental to evolution.Spiritualism cannot come from nothing.One family concept is not natural only idealism. Vedic times had a small population in Indo gangetic plains. Vedas emerged under the protected by Kshattriyas who had subdued all others and classified them on racial basis Sanskrit could not have originated with dravidians who are an Afro semetic people over run by the Aryans who came from the Caucuses. Aryan means noble because these people considered themselves to be so.
argudit 3 years ago
Sanskrit has no connection with Dravidians .On the contrary it was carried to the Dravidian people by waves of brahmins which influenced their languages immensely in that they have so many sanskrit words.Thousands of years of brahmin domination in south has been rudely terminated by dravidian empowerment that brahmins from south are flooding back to north!
argudit 3 years ago
Sanskrit means created language it was created by Aborgianl poople so called Dravidians the proper Names are Tamils, Telgu, Gonds, etc. If you read the Tirumantiram of Tirumular he say that both Tamil and Sansrit are Divine revealed languages. Tirumular was from North India and is a Tamil Rishi of South India.
Tre6789 3 years ago
There is no evidence of Sanskrit beyond Aryavarta ie south of Aravalli till brahmin movement into south. If there is no racial connection why was the northern tract known as Aryavarata.Why are brahmins in south fair and different from the main population stream.There is no trace of Sanskrit among the numerous aboriginese that exist in India known as adivasis.Influence of Sanskrit on Tamil does not mean that it originated in south.South itself was part of Africa
argudit 3 years ago
South India was part of Africa millions of years ago. Modern Humans are only thousands of years old. Secondly, there are lots of dark skinned North Indians and fair skinned South Indians. On average, South Indians happen to be darker because they are closer to the tropics.
PKPMom 3 years ago
Dark skinned North Indians are simply the original inhabitants who are in the majority,reduced to the status of shudra etc now renamed as dalits,chamars and so on.Dark north Indians are are only in plains.Kashmir,Himachal Uttarakhand the Himalayan belt does not have dark people at all other than those having moved from plains.The fair in the South are only the brahmins who moved south in days of expansion by Aryans and are being thrown out now by the Dravidian majority.
argudit 3 years ago
sorry but there is no genetic proof for your statement mate.
shadatanwar 3 years ago
a stupid racist theory
elfidanto 3 years ago
Don't you people ever grow tired, or feel stupid, using that word all the time?
GoebbelsJr 3 years ago
Where on earth is the racism in this?!?
It's pure science, based on facts and observations of linguistic patterns between a multitude of related languages.
They are not trying to demonstrate that one language or culture is better than the others - on the contrary!
ElvenDane 2 years ago
Sorry.. but going FAAR back in time, is something no one can comment on, with authority..
There are always theories ofcouse, based on who is 'wielding the sword"
If Darwin were right, it would be rats and rabbits that faced extinction, instead of tigers/lions, as i see it now
dhruv001 2 years ago
Dear Mom, South India was not part of Africa millions of years ago. Don't spread ridiculous rumors based on conjecture! I presume you are a white mom. Go stay in a the tropics for a few years and let's see your color when you are back scorched from the heat! :) BTW, R1A gene type is common among all Indians - North or South, and also found commonly in Eastern Europeans. It's the bone structure stupid~!
me2super 3 years ago
lolzzz...gud one..
elfidanto 3 years ago
please do me favor
Just go to wikipedia and search:
"Farmer's tan"
You will know how a white person can also get tanned like an indian
ragman2008 3 years ago
Again Sanskrit came from the Dravidian Priest. Then caucasians came into india from northern countries and codified a system that was full of abuse and claimed Sanskrit to themselves as a superior language. Alot of Dravidians have been tricked to believed Sanskrit comes from Europeans this is a lie. Dravidian priest revealed Sanskrit. Read what Tirumular says Sanskrit and Tamil are divine langauges. Tirumular is a Rishsi of Shavism-Tamil Shavims.
Tre6789 3 years ago
Well you might say so but we in the north do not believe in this !Explain why Aryavarta was confined only to a small northern tract.Who is this Dravidian priest we dont know.What Tirumular says I dont know but a lot of Rishis moved around and had various backgrounds! Rishis were no historians!Our events were mixed up in mythology than truth and facts.Which is why we have to fall back on western and arabic sources to put our past together!!
argudit 3 years ago
I fully respect your opinions, but the truth is Sanskrit as well is Tamil are revealed languages from the divine. One can speculate all they want but, any one who taps into the spirtual system of Sanscrit will see for themselves if the langauge is divine or is from some backward europeans. Sanskrit and Tamil where once spoken in the temples of the south side by side. Tirumular said he recieved this knowledge direct from lord Shiva. I will post it for you next post.
Tre6789 3 years ago
66: Key To Mystery Of Life
Life takes its birth, stands preserved awhile,
And then its departure takes; caught
In that momentary wave of flux, Him we glimpse,
The Lord who in Tamil sweet and northern tongue
Life's mystery revealed.
Tre6789 3 years ago
65: Revealed Alike In Sanskrit and Tamil
Devoid alike of rain and summer's gift of dew
Even the flashing lake had lost it's vernal bloom
Then did He in Sanskrit and Tamil at once,
Reveal the rich treasure of His Compassion to our Lady Great.
Tre6789 3 years ago
This is Tirumulars praise of Sanskrit and Tamil and how the Agamas we revealed in both languages.64: Import Of Agamas
Numberless the Sivagamas composed,
The Lord by His Grace revealed;
Yet they know not the wisdom He taught;
Like writing on water, the unnumbered fade.
Tre6789 3 years ago
From my studies Tamil was revealed first and Sanskrit came latter. Sanskrit was a created and revealed language and don not forget the Dravidians once populated the north also.
Also the key to decoding India is not Arabic or any other western language. The key is Masters who can teach the spiritual science of Tamil and Sanskrit
Tre6789 3 years ago
Sanskrit gave many European languages there foundation. In the same way Hebrew-Canaanite language gave the Greeks some foundation for there language by the way of letters. The word Aryan means noble it's that simple. There were several European invasions into the northern areas of most eastern countries.
Tre6789 4 years ago
There was/is no 'Aryan' race all it means is a noble person, hence distinguishing Arya and Dravida is meaningless.
tatvamasi123 4 years ago
Incocevable that a word should exist by its own without it being linked to a people and their language.Sanskrit was thus someone's language and Arya a word from that. Dravidians are quite different. There is a strong separation between north and south. There is good logic in the racial aspect.Aryans must have come from cold as they worshipped the sun (for different reasons than the Egyptians) and fire (as in Iran)
argudit 4 years ago
Interesting video. I'd like to respond to some of the misinformed comments regarding Aryan civilization and the sanskrit langauge. Aryan means noble, cultured follower of Vedic culture, which means understanding that one is eternal spirit (atman) not the temporary material body. Aryan is not a racial term or description of a specific racial group, it means any follower of Vedic culture.
KL3RIC 4 years ago
Yo dude thx for this....i really appreciate it...
ganesha24 4 years ago
Villages deep in Himalayas still have aryan descendents.Diffrences from other Indians are very clear.Hinduism dveloped by absorption of dravidian occultism and beliefs by nature worshipping aryans.Bhagwat Gita has no mention of Hindus but only kshattriyas!Prussians so to say.
argudit 4 years ago
even if there are any aryans left they are probably left in the mountians of northern pakistan. because lots blondes and blue eyes people are found there
dubai3000 4 years ago
Aryan invasions came from north west led by kshattriyas warriors establishing along Sindh-Ganga fertile belt upto Patilaputra today's Patnadefeating advanced dravidian civilisation which forms bulk if India's population.Kept them segragated by caste system which diluted slowly.There is no mention of Hindu in our scriptures.Word is arabic and descriptive no religious!
argudit 4 years ago
what are you talking about? give proof.
annie19645 4 years ago
You may read any of the sanskrit scriptures They do not speak of any Hindu !!This word came to be in use after the invasion by Alexander the Great! Which veda talks of Hindu? Or does the Bhagwat Gita ? it is only the kshattriya who is on the stage or the brahman
argudit 4 years ago
Just a minor point, I have it on good authority that "Hindu" comes from an old Persian word meaning "dark" or "thief" , not Arabic. It seems to be an example of the ancient Persian/Subcontinental rivalry where insults tended to get turned into useful words (see use of "deva" in Sanskrit and Persian).
freedom729 4 years ago
Yes thank you. It must have been so.Which establishes that Hindu is a misnomer and which is why there is no definite direction or cause in this socio entity which is its weakness.But for the philosophy and higher learning exclusive to a few only.Which is why it is exploited.
argudit 4 years ago
Well, your authority is not so good because the word Hindu comes from the river Sindh. Persians couldn't pronounce Sindh and turned it to Hind.
PKPMom 3 years ago
Yes and some in other Himalayan regions of India too.But BLOND AND BLUE EYED may not be the only criteria since pigments can change due to environment.What matters is the nose,shape of skull ,eyes and texture of skin.TODAYS HINDU SOCIETY IS DEFINITELY NOT ARYAN BUT MORE DRAVIDIAN
argudit 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How do you pronounce the following Sanskrit single word mantra's : SHYAMA, SHIRIRAM, and AYINGA ?
Thank you
Namaste
SkySurfer7 4 years ago
You have done a awsome job of reveling all these videos to all of us. Thank you for that
himalayanswastika 4 years ago
no problem boss..
im proud of Bharat's history as much as u r..
don't forget to share these videos with others..
thnx.
n33rav 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sanskrit was invented in present day pakistan
annie19645 4 years ago
to annie19645
u may be rite..even if it was invented in present pakistan tht doesn't make any diffrence. bcoz it was invented thousands of yrs ago, and pakistan used to be part of india..indians lived there
n33rav 4 years ago
present days indians didn't live there no not at all. Yes pakistan was hindu but the current people of punjab and sindh are the direct decendants of the earliest hindus, not the people from bengal or tamil nadu etc...
annie19645 4 years ago
so who were the bengal & tamil nadu then ??
n33rav 4 years ago
dravidians who had thier own religion
annie19645 4 years ago
oh realy !! what religion they had??i think dravidians were also hindu..and the theory of aryan invasion over india was made up by british to seperate north and south indians..
n33rav 4 years ago
aryans did exist and center land of aryan people was the present day land of iran/afghanistan and centeral asia.
annie19645 4 years ago
yep..i think so too..but what religion begalis & tamil belonged to?? as far as i know abt aryan invasion theory that aryan came to india & then they accpeted the hindu religion..dravidian were hindus from begining..tht's wat the theory is..i don't belive in that though
n33rav 4 years ago
The original sindhis U speak of were Hindus and the current sindhis in Pak are the weak, poor hindus that were and forcefully converted to Islam long time ago. All the hindu sindhis moved to India, the weak ones got converted which reside in Pak.
jojo70jojo 4 years ago 2
Yes Bengal is mongoloid dravidian has a lot of occult rituals .South is pure dravidian ,Sindh is Semetic.Nepal and East Himalayas are mongolian Hindu does not describe a race but a larged human congregation which was under Aryan influence once! South India was once a part of Africa!
argudit 4 years ago
What a fabulous way of describing this ancient culture and philosophy!
heatherleaves 4 years ago 2
Thanks for this vedio, You admit our racial connection and sanskrit as the mother of most european languages. I am proud to be an aryan and born in a warrior family of North India.
ShaliniVarma24 4 years ago
Well this could be true that sanskrit is mother language. but most west dont agree to that but at least it oldest in IE (indo-europien) faimly of language. So at least eldest bro status is undisputed.again uou can google for it.
pannu2k6in 4 years ago
Aryan word was coined by MaxMuller(german philospher), he got all vedas & puranas from EIC(East India company). by aryan terms he meant speakers of IE languages. Its not racial thing but certainly its always used that way. Britishes used to divide indians. Hitler used swastika nad aryan word to anihilate jews.
pannu2k6in 4 years ago
So we NI (North Indian) are native we are not ousider but we are native indian. Vedas puranas are ours saskrit is ours we are cradle of civilization. ltest genetic study prooves that. you can look for Y-chromosoe --> r1a1 and mtDNA --> U2. Latest discoveries like Saraswati river and uder sea city of dwarka cements the fact that we so called Aryan are native indian As India was known as Arya-Vart.
pannu2k6in 4 years ago
yes, Aryan invasion theory is completely wrong. You can google to see the evidences. It was used to probably divide north indian and south indian people. Truth is all old hindu scriptures are indigenous. Veda's are highest scripturs in hinduism which means knowledge.
worldishome 4 years ago
You must rethink your conception of language. People were speaking for thousands of years before the ancient Sanskrit grammarians wrote their works. Language changes gradually, and it makes no sense to say that Sanskrit is the oldest Indo-European language: we can only say that it is very close to IE and that we understand it very well. But there were languages before Proto-Indo-European that we will never know because they have left no vestiges in the oldest languages that we can study.
thepacz 4 years ago
Hey interviewr is less informed. He mentioned Vedas are some thing like OLD TESTAMENT. I guess its other way round.Pls google it and you will see VEDAS are older than OLD TESTAMENT.
Thats why india is called "Cradle of civilization". All peaceful religion are positively influnced by Hinduisim
pannu2k6in 4 years ago
Dude, I think he means like the old testimant to the new testimant. From the vedas to the modern Hindu books; ie Gita, Mahabarata etc which came thousands of years later. (Rememeber,the Vedas have been scientificly proven to be between 5000-9000 years old) And this film never argues for or against this point. I think you mis-interpreted them.. enjoy!
bavster99 4 years ago
Harih Om beeyaaaatches!
buzzin1975 4 years ago
Buddhism was born in Nepal Between india and china.and spreaded all around india and china. go get some knowledge. BITCH!!!
achalneupane 4 years ago
budhism was't born in nepal..it was born in Bihar, India..u get some knowledge
n33rav 4 years ago
Bro, buddhism was born in Nepal ? Come on bro ! Go read a history book ! jeez !
slickerthanyouravera 4 years ago
Well Gautam buddha ( siddarth) was born in nepal- lumbani! and it ends here. Rest like knowladge, speeches and evolution all are done in northern parts of india. so you can decide yourself where budhisim was born. whenever it comes to philoshy and PEACE India stand numro-uno
pannu2k6in 4 years ago
Well Gautam buddha ( siddarth) was born in nepal- lumbani! and it ends here. Rest like knowladge, speeches and evolution all are done in northern parts of india. so you can decide yourself where budhisim was born. whenever it comes to philoshy and PEACE India stand numro-uno
pannu2k6in 4 years ago
You do not know anything about Buddha, He was born in India,Beehar, his firs name was Siddhartha Gouthama, he was a hindu prince, he got tired of brahmins and their exploitation of the poor, so he left hindusim and took the old teachings of moksha, which is pre vedic teachings of disappeared indus valley civilisations.
ShaliniVarma24 4 years ago
Well i guess google is best resource to provide information. Im sure u bunked history classes in school days to see your boy friend right? Well its pay back time, go and read history book you will find he was born in lumbani,nepal . :-)
pannu2k6in 4 years ago
cool!
gangeticus 4 years ago
It is obvious that the interviewer knows something about the subject but he is trying too hard to control the answers to his own questions, often finishing sentences for Dean Brown.
svayam8 4 years ago
Sikander the once and future King
zigsauer 4 years ago
Sanskrit = San Krit = San Kritika = Like Cretan
Wake up
the term "Indoeuropean" was manifested for the judtification of Colonialism by the British
Later the Germans manifested the term "Indogerman"
zigsauer 4 years ago
There is only proto indo-iranian unity in the past. latin , greek and slavic languages were separated from poto indo-iranian at some times in the history. But the proto language and proto culture was only and only indo-iranian in central asia.
imkan125 4 years ago