Common law, common sense, and the financial crisis

[searchforknowledge1]

You dont need confidence in them fonsidream, you need confidence in you. Do a mixture between them (Law profession) and us freeman/commercial redemption/ private process. I have and the magistrates get it but forget about the lawyers. No idea. Judges think in fluidity, lawyers think in bedrock. Alastair thinks in fluidity. Beginners think in bedrock. Masters think in fluidity. Have fun i know i am. Read his book answer your own questions.

[fonsidream]

I have no confidence that the members of law societies (eg: bar association) are trained to generate interest to think humanly.

But let me suggest for sovereign people with human rights:

Check lawful validity of financial fictions, by decomposing them down to the golden law of reciprocity to treat others as you wish to be treated.

If profalastairhudson is serious with the video, he can share his knowledge on my suggestion, in his future videos.

[searchforknowledge1]

@fonsidream Did he not use the term common sense? Is it not the case that man has made these laws? Is it not the case that if the law is no good we the people have a responsibility to correct them? Especially those of us in the sovereign/commercial redemption/freeman movement who know better. This guy is good. I bought his equity/trust 6th. Helps you to see the overlap between what we are trying to achieve and what they are trying to achieve.

[fonsidream]

@searchforknowledge1

Do you know the difference between Law and Legal?

In my previous comment, I requested to check lawful validity of financial fictions.

Please try to understand my comment in good faith before arguing fore, against or else.