Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Using logic, what would be easier! Going to the Moon to film it? Or going to a studio set on earth to film it.

    Logic says, it was filmed on Earth.

  • Ummm, except that in Apollo footage, the camera pans extensively around the moonscape in a way that is absolutely impossible if this was front-screen projection.

  • Great! kids are more aware than the passing generation is.

  • This is quite irresponsible. You've overlooked the fact that you can't do pans using front screen projection, and there are clear sequences from many missions where the camera performs a 360-degree pan. Focusing on the still images is blinkered and illogical.

  • @stalkervision .. In Kubrick's 'The Shining', little Danny wore a knitted sweater showing the Apollo 11 Saturn V with the words APOLLO 11 in big block letters down the side of the rocket... In the very next scene his knitted sweater showed Disney characters, connecting Walt Disney Productions with Apollo also.

    Kubricks films were filled with all kind of clues about his involvement in faking the Apollo photography... The guy was a real chop busting genuis to hide in plain sight like that.!

  • That's pretty cool. I've never heard of that techniqure before,

  • Oh dear.

    Another moon hoax believer pretending that the evidence came before the conclusion.

    The break in the image is due to undulating ground. No tricks needed.

    Why would they use front screen projection to fake images when independent tracking by radio telescopes in a number of countries shows they really were on the moon? There is no motive to fake anything.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more