TALMUD SANHEDRIN 55B AND 54B. jews are allowed to have sex with 3yr and 1 day old girls, and sex with under 9yr boys, the talmud says it is alright, also a jew is allowed to kill, steal from, any gentile (non jew), and its not punishable it is just alright, because the non jew, is an animal in human form,jew is allowed to do what he wishes upon non-jew just the thing that any jew would not want u to know
I never thought they were people with brains in this country who seek the truth all I ever hear from this american pricks are the same old shit that Fox and CNN been telling everybody pure lies.
@ehealthy222 Well it doesn't take 6.9 secs for a building to fall at the speed of gravity. WTC 7 was a controlled demolition and I am grateful that many professionals have taken on the task to support and prove that WTC was a controlled demolition. That fact cannot be disputed no longer and it is the reason that 911 will be re-investigated in the future. So if you choose to lay back and be blind do so, yet if it becomes truth for you I can't imagine your bewilderment as many now are feeling.
Larry Silverstein said "we made the decision to pull it and then we watched it fall." He was not talking about people. The media is helping Larry the terrorist to change his story by redefining the meaning of the word "pull." Larry said "pull it" which means to pull the building. You don't call people "it." You refer to a thing as an "it." The mass media is aiding and abetting Larry the terrorist. They media lies for Larry.
@bagintree We have evidence PROVEN evidence that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition and also Nanothermite has been scientifically found at the WTC disaster areas in multiple samples that did not ignite. Military grade nanothermite! Also... there are 1000's of demolition experts that all will testify that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition. Buildings 3,4,5,6 took more of a hit from 1 and 2 and were still standing after. WTC 7 had barely no damage and fell in 6.9 seconds at the speed of gravity
@MostMagnificentOne so according to you then "Pull It" is always a reference to controlled demo??? So when you tell your mommy to leave you alone for about 15 minutes so you can go in the bathroom and "pull it" you are really telling her you are going to control demo your cock???
Member of C.H.A.N.G.E yelling at Larry Silverstein: "Tell them how you pulled the building!"
**face palm**
The FDNY (hence why Larry said "they" made the decision to pull) pulled the contingent of fire fighters out of the building.
"Pull" isn't even a term in the demolition industry for blasting a building anyway, "pull" means to actually "pull" a building/ building remains with cables, proof?
/watch?v=cUZtTQHiLSw
Most people know this, truthers just make an ass out of themselves in public.
@PoetryHound "And YOU deserve a pie in the face for false accusations."
Make that a blueberry cheesecake pie, please (made from non-radioactive dairy products, natch). But, unfortunately, I won't be deserving that pie.
Just out of curiosity, do you have any actual idea as to what Silverstein was up to? My, my, my... Larry was just an epitome of naughtiness... I don't usually approve of physical punishment, but in Larry's case, he deserves to have his butt tanned..
Operation Northwoods proves that there were some overzealous guys in the 1960's who invented a plot that never went anywhere. Big deal. It's pretty simple-minded to try to link that to what people did 40 years later. The fact is, people invent plots all the time. Governments do. Private corporations do. And so do terrorists.
"It is understood that the Department of State also is preparing suggested courses of action to develop justification of US military intervention in Cuba"
"This pilot who performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business"
"At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down a submarine or small surface craft would disperse F-101 parts, parachute, etc...the pilots returning would have a true story as far as they knew"
"Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found"
"Arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers"
"The drone meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba, the drone will begin transmitting "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack. The transmission will be interrupted by the destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal"
"This will allow radio stations to 'tell' the US what happened instead of the US trying to 'sell' the incident."
"HIJACKING attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harrassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba"
"Create an incident...that a Cuban aircraft...shot down a chartered civil airliner"
And the coupe de grace...
"An aircraft...would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft. (It) would be SUBSTITUTED FOR THE ACTUAL AIRCRAFT AND WOULD BE LOADED WITH THE SELECTED PASSENGERS BOARDED UNER ALIASES.
"JUSTIFICATION FOR US MILITARY INTERVENTION IN CUBA"
"World opinion, and the UN forum, should be favorably affected by developing the international image of the Cuban government as rash and irresponsible, and as an alarming and unpredictable threat to the peace of the western hemisphere"
"Such a plan would enable a logical build-up of incidents to be combined with other seemingly unrelated events to camoflauge the ultimate objective..."
those were some cool ass cops! they probably agreed twith the protesters thats why they didnt do anything when the reporter complained to them......the masses are waking up ! ,,,,
lets ignore governments who write manuals on how to stage terror attacks and blame certain groups,,,yep,,,,ignore it,,not suspicious at all,,,,everythings a conspiracy theory unless the government mainstream media tell u what is what.
@martynjhorne So the existence of a 40-year old declassified document about a plan that was rejected somehow proves some government officials were responsible for 911? Sure, that makes perfect sense.
@thx1138aa yes ,i know,,no matter how much historical facts are put infront of some folks face ,,,some will wrap themselves up in bondage thinking my government wouldnt do anything bad,,,i dont believe in those pesky "conspiracy theories",,,im on the winning team because i dont believe in anything like that,,,,etc etc,,,,the big elephant in the room is this stuff has happened before to start wars but some will find an excuse to not believe anything but dinosaur mainstream versions of events.
@martynjhorne Your problem is that you are unable to separate the real conspiracies from the phony ones. You're lost in kookspiracyland. You hate the government so much that when someone tells you some farfetchd thing the government supposedly did, you automatically swallow it.
Of course governments do bad things. That doesn't mean that all bad things are caused by the government. That's illogical.
@martynjhorne Yep, you automatically believe 911 conspiracy garbage that is spoonfed to you by Joe Blow's unaccountable, piece-of-shit kookspiracy web site. And why do you automaticlaly believe it? Because it makes the government out to be evil.
The other stupidity you have that is common to other twoofers is that you think anyone who disagrees with you loves and trusts the government. That's pretty stupid.
"Of course governments do bad things." I urge you to read the Northwoods document so you can see just how deep the rabbit hole goes.
net4truthusa. com/ northwoods- i. htm
No BS opinions here. This document made it all the way up to the president of the US for approval.
This is what happens when people like members of Project for a New American Century come in to power. Add in oil tycoon George Bush and you have have disaster.
@thx1138aa and dont reply back ,,,,i aint arguing with people who think in black n white,my governments good,their brown skin governments bad automatically because my master government says so,,,its not a mentality i can entertain or try to alter if thats the way u see the world working,,bye bye.
how do we explain news channels that day cutting to building seven saying building 7 has collapsed in its own footprint? when they cut to it,it was still standing?hmmmm,,,,oh im questioning the official story ,that means i must be a conspiracy theorist,right? oh dear ,dear dear me
@martynjhorne easy you are full of shit. Only the BBC made the error of reporting that it collapsed early and the reason why it did so has already been explained. The firefighters on scene were making statements like the building is in trouble we are pulling back because it could collapse. By the time it made it to the reporter it was the building did collapse. She explains it here on You Tube. And y ou are not a conpiracy theorist you are just a dumbass for posting such a stupid comment.
@12weasel100 ok,that will do for you,,,and everything else u get told,,,stay servile,,question NOTHING .You know al cia aeda is planning on sewing bombs inside theyre bodies next to blow up planes,,,,now all u gotta do is believe your government are always the good guys and they will put intrude more into your life ,and you will let them,,,,now my friend ,u stay in hollywood land where your/our government are always honest,good ,,,regardless of history and what it tells us,,yes?good.
@12weasel100 our governments the good guys remember? dont question anything,,,the west is automatically the good guys yes? our governments have never plotted fake attacks to pursue something else yes?put your head back in the sand,,u hate anything that questions blatant bullshit,in doing so u r defending the same crooks who are bombarding u with lies,,u wud willingly let your government take every bit of freedom u got,in order to protect you from "terrorists" who want to take your freedoms.hmmm
@martynjhorne I never made any comments about the government good or bad. There are no issues with asking questions. The problem with you assholes is when you are provided with answers that conflict with all your bullshit lies you refuse to listen to. There is a difference between asking questions to learn and asking questions like a Truther that just wants to be able to hear their own voice and spew out shit. If you ask then you should be willing to listen something Truthers fail to do.
@12weasel100 theyre answers? theyre weak and theyre 1 dimensional,hence why i suspect most "truthers" are far beyond silly reasoning and dont give silly reasoning the time of day,study history,conspiricies,yeah,not,theory though,,,go study these people and what they write about
@martynjhorne yes THERE are answers and they only seem weak to the weak minded. You clearly have no education and have deluded little paranoid thoughts. You need help you sad pathetic fool.
@12weasel100 ad hominem,,,insults eh? stay servile,your government love you,,,yes they do.Ignore history,ignore theyre double speak ,ignore real historical facts,,,bask in your ignorance,thats the culture and behaviour uve been sold ,lap it up
@martynjhorne no I do not ignore facts or history. Facts clearly show that 911 was not an inside job and not controlled demo. You idiots on the other hand are trying to rewrite history through bullshit none of it has any facts to back up anything you claim. And I am not "insulting you randomly" your responses clearly show paranoid deluded thoughts you need professional help. You fucking moron (again not a random insult your responses clearly show you are a fucking moron)
@12weasel100 grow up,,,uve been spoon fed your government are your parents,go to them ,suck their teets,,,im not banging my head against a wall ,bye/fuck off/stay servile/dont reply/.....remember the boogeyman will get u if u dont put every aspect of your life in your friendly governments hands.
@martynjhorne why is it that everyone one of you fucking idiots make people retype the same thing over and over.I guess it is because you are too fucking stupid to understand things when told to you the first time.As I have already written I have not made any comments for or against the government. I have an education that I use to examine all the facts and it is clear that you idiots have no facts. And as I have written your response shows paranoid deluded thoughts you shoud seek help You moron
"why is it that everyone one of you fucking idiots make people retype the same thing over and over.I guess it is because you are too fucking stupid to understand things when told to you the first time."
Larry admitted pulling WTC7. ABC cameramen filmed the shaped charges going on, seen as flashes of light in windows going straight up from floor to floor. Geological measurments measured the ground shake from explosions before planes hit. Many witnesses say and heard explosions before the planes hit. In films, squibs are seen explosing in 9/11 footage. Military-grade nanothermite was found in the dust surrounding the WTC on 9/11. There's no doubt it was a controlled demolition - none.
@MostMagnificentOne you are a fucking retard. Larry did not admit to pulling WTC7. Pulling it is not a term used for controlled demo. Pulling a building means attaching cables to the building and using heavy equipment to pull it down. Or in your deluded state did you see big cables attached to WTC7. Also Larry did not say he pulled it. He clearly says the fire chief made the decision to pull it (or do you think the fire chief is now involved also) and he was refering to the fire operation (cont)
@MostMagnificentOne (continued) you are a fucking joke and a fucking loser. What Larry stated and what he was referring to has been clearly explained a long time ago yet you still use this as some type of argument to prove controlled demo. If Larry really meant destroy the building then the insurance companies that are a hell of a lot smarter than your stupid ass would not have paid out. You clearly are a deluded fucking retarded asshole of a moron.
@astralwalk no We Are Change has not been growing in popularity. Their support has been in steady decline. And just because someone does not agree with their bullshit it does not mean that person is a paid govt agent or "shill". Only deluded paranoid fucking idiots believe that anytime someone disagrees with them then that person must be a govt agent. Those of us that disagree with this bullshit are not govt agents we are people with an education that are smarter than these stupid assholes
@12weasel100 No their getting more popular. More chapters are opening up everywhere. What is so bad about holding people accountable? The official story of 9/11 is so full of holes only truly asleep people believe it.
@astralwalk no they are not getting more popular. At the height of the movement in 2006 it was somewhere around 46% of the people thought there was something not right with the offical story. Today that number is somewhere around 4-5% of the people. So unless you think 4% is a larger number than 46% (you probably do in some deluded way) then it is obvious that people do not believe the bullshit you Truthers spew out. Because you have no facts to back anything you claim. You moron.
@astralwalk no there are no facts that support controlled demo. If there were you would use them instead of quoting stupid catch phrases like "shills", "wake up" or "you are asleep" that the rest of you truther sheep herd use. So then what facts do you have that clearly proves controlled demo (no bullshit quotes from AETruth that is made up lies and opinions but proven facts based on proven concepts). I know you will respond with more bullshit and lies you moron.
@thx1138aa I know it is funny how they all chant "911 Was an Inside Job" or "wake up" or "troll, shill etc" on every video they see, march around like mindless idiots chanting at Ground Zero and will guide you to watch only certain videos or listen to only certain people or read only certain books and websites but then resort to calling people that disagree with all there bullshit when they cannot produce any facts to back up any of their bullshit claims sheep.
@12weasel100 I don't necessarily support the controlled demolition theory, and nowhere did I say I did. I have no doubt a vast power of illusion was exercised on people that day for various insane reasons. Honestly there are just far, far too many things wrong with the 9/11 official story for it to be the truth of what happened. And really, I don't care what you want to believe.
@astralwalk so you don't believe in controlled demo but you believe 911 was an inside job so you think the terrorist were in on it too now???? You Truther idiots keep making up bullshit and each time it is proven wrong you keep changing your story so you can continue to live this deluded little fantasy that the world is the cause of your own short comings. You are a sad group of idiots.
I love it when conspiracy kooks claim their “movement” is growing. Yeah, sure it is. 911 Truth was not an issue in the 2008 US presidential election. There has been no election in the USA in which it has been an issue. Street demonstrations can't get more than a handful of people out. AE911truth does nothing except look for names for a petition and raise money. There is no mention of this 911 conspiracy crap in any engineering or construction textbook used anywhere on Earth. Nice going, kooks.
@bagintree FOX NEWS: Larry Silverstein Asked Insurance Co to Allow Controlled Demolition watch this video. it's news footage of larry silverstein admitting that he told a demolition company to bring down tower 7. u may not share the same belief with truthers but they are more patriotic for asking these hard questions than someone who sees inconsistencies and still holds to an obvious lie. there are too many questions to follow blindly wouldn't u say?
@dawatcha100 When it became clear WTC 7 was so unstable that it was likely to collapse, Silverstein very publicly asked if there wasn't some way to have a last minute demolition in order to prevent damage to surrounding buildings. If that was a possibility, then he wanted to be sure insurance would cover it. That plan never went forward because demo experts told him a last minute demo would be impossible.
But leave it to "truthers" to distort the whole thing and tell blatant lies.
I served on the DMZ in Korea and I also served in Vietnam and I am a disabled Veteran because I broke my back while serving and now I am ashamed that every served, because I was made to watch you the American bow down like the cowards you are and allowed another Coward George W Bush accomplish what no army could, He took the constitution and spit on it and took away our rights. Thank you American citizens for spiting upon us veterans both living and dead.
can you all chill. i knew people that died in those towers....the honest truth is that psychos flew planes into buildings. get over it. america is hated by everyone. and thats the truth.
@bubbilicious429 i dont stand in line. im actually as close to an anarchist as you can get without being an anarchist. sure the government has done horrid things. but yall are conspiracy theorist. when you can actually prove by showing me explosive devises that were in the building ill believe. but your logic and theory has to many flaws
@zeekX141 Thermite or Thermate military grade. That what was coming out of the buildings before they came down and why there was molten metal under the rubble. The molten metal under the rubble was 700+ degrees 2 months after. it's on youtube.It will tell you what you need to know. it was found in the dust that a whole lot of people gathered and had it analyzed. Found traces of Thermite.
@The10man1 the only problem with your theory is that you say jet fuel wont melt metal. which you are wrong because jet fuel burns at 900 degrees Cel and all is it would need to do is weaken the metal enough so that several thousands of ton could come crashing down! also it seems that you will believe anything that someone who is for the non popular idea.
@zeekX141 the so-called truth of the gov't has too many flaws. u know that they won't be able to show explosive devices because there was no access by anyone who would've checked for them. the firefighters and people there reported hearing explosions from the lower levels of the towers. are they lying also to support a conspiracy theory. this is shown in the news footage from that day. too many questions to accept the given story also.
@dawatcha100 Explosions are common in fires. Explosions don't automatically = explosives. Looks like you were unaware of that. Glad I could help educate you.
@bagintree yeah but the explosions were on the lower levels. things that explode in a fire are usually in the fire or subject to the heat from the fire. the lower levels of world trade center were far from the heat and fire and the firemen were a few levels above the explosions. looks like you were unaware of that. glad i could help educate you.
@dawatcha100 There were explosions on lower levels from the jet fuel-ignited fireballs that traveled down the elevator shafts and blew out elevator doors on various lower level floors. Looks like you were unaware of that too. Glad I could educate you again.
@bagintree Do you have evidence to back up this statement? I'm not trying to antagonize, I honestly want to know if this is true or if you are just making wild assumptions.
@STNKbone This guy compiled witness accounts from dozens of sources and found that 64 people on 43 levels below the impact zones reported smelling or contacting jet fuel/kerosene on these floors, while 33 people on 18 levels below the impact zones reported seeing fireballs coming from elevator shafts or down hallways
@bagintree Well it's all about how our brains percieve the universe. If someone actually thinks that they barely saw a fireball shoot through them with all that dust, they'll want to believe that they saw it. Then if someone else (such as the government) tells them that there were fireballs, then their brain can actually hallucinate and believe this because the belief is "set in stone" in the person's cerebral cortex.
@kidkong584 Oh, I see. So if the government told you there were fireballs even though you didn't see any, you'd believe you saw them? I don't think they could convince me of that, but apparently you think they'd be able to convince you.
Gee! The government sure got to those people quickly! Good thing none of them reported the government tried to force them what to think.
Hey, did the gov't tell these witnesses to report that they smelled kerosene at the site of the blown out elevators too?
@bagintree When they were told that there was tons of jetfuel released, they would think "hmm, maybe I did smell jetfuel." As you contemplate the idea, it would evolve in your brain and seem true.
Also, there WERE people who said things that contradicted the government's origional claims. Sadly, they all died mysteriously within a year. (Barry Jennings, Kennith Johannson, etc.)
@kidkong584 Someone must have got to those witnesses IMMEDIATELY because they told reporters they smelled kerosene. Man, what an amazing job those fictitious conspirators did. Not only did they magically fly the planes into the building but they hypnotized everyone into believing they saw fireballs and smelled kerosene. I guess they hypnotized people into believing the elevators were blown out too. Incredible job and you're the only one who's seen through it! Congratulations!!!
@bagintree Some reported Kerosine, some reported Cordine. Pretty much every witness at the Pentagon reported cordine. However, there was a witness who said that what she saw hitting the pentagon wasn't a plane. However as soon as she got to the hospital, there were two men who walked into her room and asked her what she saw. They kept insisting that it was a plane, but she kept saying no it wasn't. They told her to just shut up and take the compensation money.
@kidkong584 You mean cordite? Nope, no one reported smelling that at the twin towers. And you're wrong that "pretty much every witness at the Pentagon reported" it. Just one guy did. You're sure getting a lot of things wrong.
As for what hit the Pentagon, hundreds of people saw the plane. Oh wait! They were all hypnotized into saying it, right? Just like the people at the twin towers who saw fireballs and smelled kerosene. All hypnotized by the CIA!.
@kidkong584 "Eyewitness reports aren't the most credible"
You're right. When there's just one or two, they're not that credible. But there were dozens of witness statements and hundreds, if not thousands of people in morning rush hour traffic on I-395 and nearby roads saw FL 77. There's no evidence the plane went anywhere other than the Pentagon. Absolutely none.
@bagintree There isn't. When people started to hear what was going on, they found out that planes were hitting buildings, they could start to say. "OH! That was a plane! I get it now!" If you watch amateur vids of people after the explosion, some were talking about it being a missile.
Most pilots started to wave their bs flags when they heard the official story of the pentagon
If you think people can be brainwashed by media reports, you're revealing more about yourself than about others. You're basically admitting that YOU could be brainwashed by media reports.
Most pilots? Nonsense.
There's no evidence FL77 went anywhere other than the Pentagon. None.
@bagintree "We heard what sounded like a missile" -Tom Seibert
"I was convinced that it was a missile." -Lou Rains
Basically, Hani Hanjour was barely able to control a Cessna 171. A Cessna 171 and a Boeing 757 have two entirely different cockpits. Most pilots have failed at pulling this off in flight simulators. Winds would leave you and you'd end up crashing. There were no skidmarks on the Pentagon lawn. The most secrure building on earth, and a potato shoots better vids than the one given.
@kidkong584 I repeat, no one said it looked like a missile. The examples you gave were people who said it SOUNDED like a missile. Guess how many of the dozens of eyewitness statements said it looked like a missile? Zero.
So now you're claiming FL77 hit the Pentagon but Hanjour wasn't at the controls? I thought you claimed it was a missile. If it was a missile, then how could a 757 be making the supposedly difficult maneuver into the Pentagon?
1. You claimed WTC elevator shafts were "airtight." FALSE
2. You claimed pretty much every witness at the Pentagon reported cordine (You meant cordite?) FALSE
3. You claimed "most pilots" started to wave their bs flags about the official story. FALSE
4. You claimed WTC witnesses never really saw fireballs or smelled kerosene & instead yielded to government suggestions about those things. NONSENSE MADE UP BY YOU.
2. Thanks for admitting you got the "cordine" claim wrong.
3. Thanks for admitting your claim about "most pilots" was wrong. As for flying a plane into a building, what's so hard about that?
4. "The human mind is extremely suceptable to hallucinations" Maybe, but how could hundreds of people have the same hallucination? Makes no sense. Hundreds saw FL 77 hit the Pentagon. Many saw fireballs & smelled kerosene in the twin towers.
@kidkong584 "I never admitted that I got the cordine claim wrong."
You claimed pretty much every witness at the Pentagon reported cordine. That's incorrect. Plus, you made the error of calling it cordine when in fact it's cordite. Looks like you are unable to admit any of your errors, and you're making A LOT of them.
"Most of the people that reported seeing a plane said it was a commuter plane."
1)Well sorry that I didn't have the chemical down correctly. I'm only 14, so I won't be taking chem for another two years.
2) I've only seen about two claims saying that it was a 757. Most said that it was a commuter plane. There are some different reports though. Some reported a missile, some reported a helicopter, and there were one or two that reported a Boeing 757.
Just one question though. If the footage is real, than why didn't it leave skidmarks flying that low?
Most eyewitnesses said it was a commercial jetliner. None said they saw a missile. Only a couple said they thought they saw a smaller plane. If you google Pentagon eyewitnesses you'll find the lists of witnesses and what they saw.
Thanks for admitting you got the chemical wrong, but you're still wrong in your claim that "pretty much every witness at the Pentagon" reported it.
I don't know why there weren't skidmarks. I'm not a crash site investigator or aeronautical engineer.
@bagintree I've only seen one or two reports of a 757. That turn was too complex for someone who couldn't handle a Cessna 171 (I'm 14 and can control one) to pull off. On September 10, Rumsfeld said that we were missing $2.4 trillion in debt. This debt dissappeared after 9/11.
@kidkong584 Most people can't identify a 757, but they can identify a commercial jetliner and they did. Some even noted the AA markings on it.
People saw the plane crash into the Pentagon so evidently the turn wasn't too complex.
You sure are getting a lot of things wrong. The unaccounted for funds at the Pentagon were well known before Rumsfeld's announcement. The sums mounted over the years. And no, the debt didn't disappear after 9/11. You must be relying on some terrible info sources.
@bagintree Are you talking about people like Mike Walters? His interview has been debunked several times. He reported seeing a plane fly in front of him, him reading the logo, then seeing it take out the rest of the lightpoles and fly across the field to slam into the building. He later said that the wings folded back towards the fueslage and slammed into the building. Only one problem. His view would have been fully obstructed by a couple of trees. No way he could have seen it.
@kidkong584 No, his view wasn't obstructed by trees. You made that up.
You've got dozens of eyewitness reports to try to dismiss. Get going. Who should we believe about what they saw - them or you? They have credibility on the matter. You don't.
Remember, there's absolutely no evidence that FL77 went anywhere other than the Pentagon.
@bagintree His view was directly obstructed by trees. If he was able to see the AA on the side of the plane, he would have had to have been behind the trees. Several of these witnesses were at the exact same vantage point. Directly behind the trees. Mike's was the most famous because he's tried to refute the conspiracies, but he's continually failed. Also, most of these reports that you're talking about were by people that worked for USA Today. All on the same highway.
@kidkong584 His view was not obstructed. He had no reason to lie. He is one of dozens of witness statements and one of hundreds, if not thousands, who saw the plane fly into the Pentagon. They worked at all kinds of places, not just USA Today. You've got your work cut out for you trying to refute all those witnesses. Were they all lying for some reason? I think they have more credibility than you do.
So now everyone at USA Today are part of the plot? You're hilarious.
@kidkong584 I just wanted to remind you that you made this claim:
"Most of the people that reported seeing a plane said it was a commuter plane."
Then you made this claim:
"most of these reports that you're talking about were by people that worked for USA Today"
So that means most of the people at USA Today said they saw a commuter plane. If you believe people who work at USA Today were part of a plot, then why would they say they saw a commuter plane?
@bagintree No, most of the people that reported seeing a plane were by people who worked for USA Today. (btw I said "Most of the reports THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT." All of these reporters were coming into work late that day (although they were all within .16 of a mile from each other driving to work...) and saw this. Most of their accounts have been called invalid because of their vantage points.
@kidkong584 So most of the USA Today reporters said it was a commuter plane? I haven't seen any evidence of that.
There are dozens of eyewitness reports from people who worked at a variety of places. Nearly all of them said they saw a jetliner. Most of them DID NOT work for USA Today. You're getting lots of things wrong. Why don't you actually read the witness statements instead of repeating some garbage you found on Joe Blow's unaccountable web site?
@kidkong584 USA Today was located north of the Pentagon, while the eyewitnesses in rush hour traffic on I-395 were south of the Pentagon. Completely different people.
@zeekX141 it doesn't matter that u knew people who died in the building. that doesn't mean that u know what the truth is. america is hated by many nations and there is a reason for it but that doesn't change the fact that there are more questions with the given story than there are answers. it is the job of a patriot to make sure that our government is held accountable for injustice and this requires the courage to ask questions not smart remarks and anger. those who ask do us all a service.
@dawatcha100 but now you are trying to pull blame from something and make the GOV a distraction. sure the GOV is a huge prob. but theres no way you can fake what happened. 9/11 happened. get over it. people saw with their own eyes what happened. anyways the facts for this have to low of a probability.
I'm guessing you didn't do that quick search that was suggested.. you are obviously still blinded by power. Look at how fast the dollar has dropped, ever heard of "inflation"? We are going into extreme debt, and it is mathematically impossible to get out of it. "Get a lobotomy you fucking idiot." Sounds like yours didn't work.
DON'T BE JEALOUS OF PEOPLE WITH MONEY FOLKS....IF LARRY WAS IN ON A CONSPIRACY, BELIEVE ME , HIS INSURANCE COMPANY WOULDN'T BE PAYING HIM OFF..NO INSIDE JOB...SORRY TO DISAPPOINT
@Baskinrobems Hha by what a yellow journalist organization popular machanics? Dude just do your self a favor and maybe take a high school physics class. It would do wonders on your critical thinking abilities.I believe last time i checked "pancake theory" is yiddish for BULLSHIT.
@northwestblazinfire Yeah well anyone with a highschool degree can tell you 9/11 wasn't an inside job. The only thing you guys can hold on to is that we dont know everything about WTC 7. All your other "facts" have been disproven. Put aside your hate for the government and look at the obvious you fucking dumbass.
@Baskinrobems You have got to be fucking joking right? "All your other "facts" have been disproven", it is the complete opposite. Retards like you are the ones who continue to self destruct this country, I bet you didn't know if we didn't invade Iraq for the oil, our economy would have collapsed WITHIN 10 years? Look that shit up stupid cunt
@akkingpin1 You realize all you did was say "NO THEY'RE NOT MY FACTS ARE PROVEN!!! LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!" And that other little "fact" you throughout is complete bullshit. And even if it were true thats complete and shaky speculation and I doubt the government would kill thousands of its own citizens for it. Also I'm sure they were able to predict our economy in 10 years but not be able to predict the housing collapse. Get a lobotomy you fucking idiot.
@northwestblazinfire YEAH THE GOV'T HATCHED A PLOT FOR THE BUILDINGS TO COLLAPSE...AND IT'S SO OBVIOUS THEY CAN'T COLLAPSE FROM IMPACT/FIRE/CONSTRUCTION LIKE YOU TRUTHERS SAY...BUT THEY THOUGHT THEY COULD GET EVERYBODY TO BELIEVE SUCH AN OBVIOUS IMPOSSIBILITY...LOL YEAH RIGHT STFU CONSPIRACY CLOWNS
I love it when the conspiracy kooks try to claim they're on the side of physicists. If that were true, where are all the physicists? Are they all remaining silent about what they know to be true because they're afraid of being assassinated by the CIA? Sure bet.
I love it when ignorant rednecks try to act like they even know what the science of physics is. Dude do your self a favor, for christs sake READ A BOOK. Stop acting like you know anything at all, just stick to what you know, which is stuff like which gun is better at killing things the Ak-47 or M-16. Real topics are left to real critical thinkers now run alonge and shoot something.
@northwestblazinfire LMAO! So you can't answer the question either. If the mainstream version of what happened on 9/11 violates the laws of physics, then where are all the physicists?
All you could do is post irrelevant nonsense. But thanks for trying.
@bagintree You are obviously retarded, do a QUICK, yes fucking QUICK search of 911 physics in google, and find ONE architech, engineer, physicist, scientist, ect you get the point, who DOESN'T agree with the REAL facts on 911, not the ones the government has been feeding us, stupid fucking idiot. We are NOT remaining silent, people are stepping up one by one, and all of them come back with the same conclusions, THE WTC TOWERS WERE TAKEN DOWN BY NANO THERMITE dumb bitch
@northwestblazinfire Indeed, the Pancake theory is the closest NIST can come to figuring out what happened, without testing for explosives and so forth. The biggest flaw in the pancake theory is the top part of the building turns into dust, AND they DO NOT explain what happened to the center fucking collums, anyone with 1/4 a brain can tell there is some MAJOR FUCKING flaws in their report that NEED to be addressed, along with them caught LYING about their "Hypothesis" and avoiding the "FACTS"
"over 9 years and "truthers" still can't agree on who, how, and why"
Yep, they keep repeating the same old lies, pseudo-science, and baseless assertions in their little echo chamber. They are doomed to their rightful place as a sociological oddity alongside moon landing denial and creationism.
@noozilander There's no evidence of any explosives at WTC 7, and unlike in a CD, only 15% of the collapse was at freefall.
You forgot to mention that the firefighters said the building was unstable and leaning. I know you want to pound your fist on the table and cry Nooooo! But that's true.
K.O.O.K.S. confront Larry Silverstein.
PoetryHound 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TALMUD SANHEDRIN 55B AND 54B. jews are allowed to have sex with 3yr and 1 day old girls, and sex with under 9yr boys, the talmud says it is alright, also a jew is allowed to kill, steal from, any gentile (non jew), and its not punishable it is just alright, because the non jew, is an animal in human form,jew is allowed to do what he wishes upon non-jew just the thing that any jew would not want u to know
debunkNEGATOR 4 months ago
That bald young dude has balls on him, and they are HUGE!
livingeasi 4 months ago
Piss-ant young college punks that have nothing better to do than to falsely accuse an old man with no evidence whatsoever
*spit*
AlQaedaIsReal 5 months ago
What the fuck? what's up with the all seeing eye pictures and everything in that NYC subway? What's the story on that?
jedichris8 5 months ago
Larry Silverstein do you want to face the Demons of this Earth, or the Demons of the next world?
What happens when you go to sleep Larry?
Where do you think you will go when you are dead?
Same place ASSHOLE
Legion is waiting.
Confess now, or confess later.
Believe me, the pain is less in this world.
Confess
surfn123 5 months ago
this guys got balls =)
PlAtNuMReEkAn 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
✈ ▌▌
driller62869 5 months ago
I believe Hitler has said " How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think" That quote is so very true.
It''s sad there are so few people willing demonstrate against official 911 lies.
Unfortunately most people don't want to know the truth and could care less.
ChilesGreen 5 months ago 2
I never thought they were people with brains in this country who seek the truth all I ever hear from this american pricks are the same old shit that Fox and CNN been telling everybody pure lies.
snv214 5 months ago
He is not a criminal he is worst a fuckin JEW.
snv214 5 months ago 3
Nazi Truther
Sonjaaa99 5 months ago
@Sonjaaa99 LMAO...ok keep telling your self that
911WASanINSIDEjob420 1 month ago
@snv214 no he is a zionist
911WASanINSIDEjob420 2 months ago
@911WASanINSIDEjob420 no, more specifically he is a T E R R O R I S T
WorldwideWakeupCall 1 month ago
Imagine this guy having a bath in his luxury villa, knowing it was all earned over the blood of thousands of people...
barthoedemaker 5 months ago 2
911 = INSIDE JO B.
glassandroid 5 months ago 3
Larry Silverstein you will die screaming................anybody that buys Larry Silverstein,s bullshit, you can not be helped....
guitatac 5 months ago
It sounds quite reasonable that he meant "pull the fire fighters".........
not "pull the building" -----He was talking to a fire chief, not a demolitionist.
Fire fighters don't blow up buildings, that's not what they do.
That said - I think there's a lot of evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. But that particular "pull it" quote is not valid evidence.
In the demolition industry, "pull" means to "pull the cables" - not blow up a building via explosives.
ehealthy222 6 months ago
@ehealthy222 Well it doesn't take 6.9 secs for a building to fall at the speed of gravity. WTC 7 was a controlled demolition and I am grateful that many professionals have taken on the task to support and prove that WTC was a controlled demolition. That fact cannot be disputed no longer and it is the reason that 911 will be re-investigated in the future. So if you choose to lay back and be blind do so, yet if it becomes truth for you I can't imagine your bewilderment as many now are feeling.
Mycterizian 5 months ago 2
Larry Silverstein said "we made the decision to pull it and then we watched it fall." He was not talking about people. The media is helping Larry the terrorist to change his story by redefining the meaning of the word "pull." Larry said "pull it" which means to pull the building. You don't call people "it." You refer to a thing as an "it." The mass media is aiding and abetting Larry the terrorist. They media lies for Larry.
MostMagnificentOne 7 months ago 6
@MostMagnificentOne You got it wrong. Silverstein never said "we made the decision to pull it." He said "They made that decision to pull."
So who is "they?"
"Pull it" as in pull the firefighting contingent.
Got any evidence Silverstein is a terrorist. No, of course you don't. Just a stupid misinterpretation of two words. Typical kook.
bagintree 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bagintree Monkeys like you aren't evolved. It shows in your lack of logic. You must be one of them.
MostMagnificentOne 7 months ago
@bagintree We have evidence PROVEN evidence that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition and also Nanothermite has been scientifically found at the WTC disaster areas in multiple samples that did not ignite. Military grade nanothermite! Also... there are 1000's of demolition experts that all will testify that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition. Buildings 3,4,5,6 took more of a hit from 1 and 2 and were still standing after. WTC 7 had barely no damage and fell in 6.9 seconds at the speed of gravity
Mycterizian 5 months ago
@MostMagnificentOne
You lying limey sack of shit. "THEY made the decision to pull (the men and Equipment)"
AlQaedaIsReal 5 months ago
@MostMagnificentOne so according to you then "Pull It" is always a reference to controlled demo??? So when you tell your mommy to leave you alone for about 15 minutes so you can go in the bathroom and "pull it" you are really telling her you are going to control demo your cock???
12weasel100 1 week ago
Member of C.H.A.N.G.E yelling at Larry Silverstein: "Tell them how you pulled the building!"
**face palm**
The FDNY (hence why Larry said "they" made the decision to pull) pulled the contingent of fire fighters out of the building.
"Pull" isn't even a term in the demolition industry for blasting a building anyway, "pull" means to actually "pull" a building/ building remains with cables, proof?
/watch?v=cUZtTQHiLSw
Most people know this, truthers just make an ass out of themselves in public.
theBartone9119 7 months ago
Member of C.H.A.N.G.E yelling at Larry Silverstein: "He's a criminal!!!"
Some dudes in the background: "He's a cool guy!" "Shut up!"
Member of C.H.A.N.G.E yelling at Larry Silverstein: "He's a criminal..."
Haha Truther got pwned
theBartone9119 7 months ago
Larry was just awfully, awfully, awfully naughty and needs a good spanking.
Evilness much, Larry?
electronfun 7 months ago
@electronfun And YOU deserve a pie in the face for false accusations.
PoetryHound 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PoetryHound "And YOU deserve a pie in the face for false accusations."
Make that a blueberry cheesecake pie, please (made from non-radioactive dairy products, natch). But, unfortunately, I won't be deserving that pie.
Just out of curiosity, do you have any actual idea as to what Silverstein was up to? My, my, my... Larry was just an epitome of naughtiness... I don't usually approve of physical punishment, but in Larry's case, he deserves to have his butt tanned..
electronfun 7 months ago
Operation Northwoods proves that there were some overzealous guys in the 1960's who invented a plot that never went anywhere. Big deal. It's pretty simple-minded to try to link that to what people did 40 years later. The fact is, people invent plots all the time. Governments do. Private corporations do. And so do terrorists.
PoetryHound 7 months ago
Northwoods (I'm done after this one)
"It is understood that the Department of State also is preparing suggested courses of action to develop justification of US military intervention in Cuba"
CORRUPT THROUGH AND THROUGH...
...AND YOU NEVER WOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT IT!
JSSTyger 7 months ago
Northwoods
"This pilot who performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business"
"At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down a submarine or small surface craft would disperse F-101 parts, parachute, etc...the pilots returning would have a true story as far as they knew"
"Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found"
SOUNDS LIKE PLANTING EVIDENCE IS EASY.
JSSTyger 7 months ago
Northwoods
"Arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers"
"The drone meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba, the drone will begin transmitting "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack. The transmission will be interrupted by the destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal"
"This will allow radio stations to 'tell' the US what happened instead of the US trying to 'sell' the incident."
SOUNDS JUST LIKE 9-11 AND IRAQ
JSSTyger 7 months ago
@JSSTyger The most significant thing about Northwood is that it was rejected, never implemented, and then declassified for all to see.
PoetryHound 7 months ago
Northwoods
"HIJACKING attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harrassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba"
"Create an incident...that a Cuban aircraft...shot down a chartered civil airliner"
And the coupe de grace...
"An aircraft...would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft. (It) would be SUBSTITUTED FOR THE ACTUAL AIRCRAFT AND WOULD BE LOADED WITH THE SELECTED PASSENGERS BOARDED UNER ALIASES.
JSSTyger 7 months ago
Northwoods
"...burn aircraft...lob mortar shells...capture assault teams...sabotage ship in harbor...sink ship...CONDUCT FUNERALS OF MOCK VICTIMS"
"The US would respond by executing offensive operations..."
"Commence large scale US military operations"
"We could blow up a droned vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters."
"THE US COULD FOLLOW UP WITH AN AIR/SEA RESCUE TO 'EVACUATE' REMAINING MEMBERS OF THE N-O-N-E-X-I-S-T-A-N-T CREW."
JSSTyger 7 months ago
Northwoods
"The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the US in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances..."
"Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation for US military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan...could be executed..."
"A series of coordinated incidents will be planned..."
"Start rumors...stage an attack on (Gitmo)...capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs...start riots...blow up ammunition start fires..."
JSSTyger 7 months ago
Snippets from Northwoods
"JUSTIFICATION FOR US MILITARY INTERVENTION IN CUBA"
"World opinion, and the UN forum, should be favorably affected by developing the international image of the Cuban government as rash and irresponsible, and as an alarming and unpredictable threat to the peace of the western hemisphere"
"Such a plan would enable a logical build-up of incidents to be combined with other seemingly unrelated events to camoflauge the ultimate objective..."
JSSTyger 7 months ago
those were some cool ass cops! they probably agreed twith the protesters thats why they didnt do anything when the reporter complained to them......the masses are waking up ! ,,,,
whstsi 7 months ago
lets ignore governments who write manuals on how to stage terror attacks and blame certain groups,,,yep,,,,ignore it,,not suspicious at all,,,,everythings a conspiracy theory unless the government mainstream media tell u what is what.
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@martynjhorne So the existence of a 40-year old declassified document about a plan that was rejected somehow proves some government officials were responsible for 911? Sure, that makes perfect sense.
thx1138aa 7 months ago
@thx1138aa yes ,i know,,no matter how much historical facts are put infront of some folks face ,,,some will wrap themselves up in bondage thinking my government wouldnt do anything bad,,,i dont believe in those pesky "conspiracy theories",,,im on the winning team because i dont believe in anything like that,,,,etc etc,,,,the big elephant in the room is this stuff has happened before to start wars but some will find an excuse to not believe anything but dinosaur mainstream versions of events.
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@martynjhorne Your problem is that you are unable to separate the real conspiracies from the phony ones. You're lost in kookspiracyland. You hate the government so much that when someone tells you some farfetchd thing the government supposedly did, you automatically swallow it.
Of course governments do bad things. That doesn't mean that all bad things are caused by the government. That's illogical.
thx1138aa 7 months ago
@thx1138aa automatically? we dont know each other ,let not waste each others time,bye
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@martynjhorne Yep, you automatically believe 911 conspiracy garbage that is spoonfed to you by Joe Blow's unaccountable, piece-of-shit kookspiracy web site. And why do you automaticlaly believe it? Because it makes the government out to be evil.
The other stupidity you have that is common to other twoofers is that you think anyone who disagrees with you loves and trusts the government. That's pretty stupid.
thx1138aa 7 months ago
@thx1138aa
"Of course governments do bad things." I urge you to read the Northwoods document so you can see just how deep the rabbit hole goes.
net4truthusa. com/ northwoods- i. htm
No BS opinions here. This document made it all the way up to the president of the US for approval.
This is what happens when people like members of Project for a New American Century come in to power. Add in oil tycoon George Bush and you have have disaster.
JSSTyger 7 months ago
@thx1138aa documents arent manuals......
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@thx1138aa and dont reply back ,,,,i aint arguing with people who think in black n white,my governments good,their brown skin governments bad automatically because my master government says so,,,its not a mentality i can entertain or try to alter if thats the way u see the world working,,bye bye.
martynjhorne 7 months ago
how do we explain news channels that day cutting to building seven saying building 7 has collapsed in its own footprint? when they cut to it,it was still standing?hmmmm,,,,oh im questioning the official story ,that means i must be a conspiracy theorist,right? oh dear ,dear dear me
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@martynjhorne easy you are full of shit. Only the BBC made the error of reporting that it collapsed early and the reason why it did so has already been explained. The firefighters on scene were making statements like the building is in trouble we are pulling back because it could collapse. By the time it made it to the reporter it was the building did collapse. She explains it here on You Tube. And y ou are not a conpiracy theorist you are just a dumbass for posting such a stupid comment.
12weasel100 7 months ago
@12weasel100 ok,that will do for you,,,and everything else u get told,,,stay servile,,question NOTHING .You know al cia aeda is planning on sewing bombs inside theyre bodies next to blow up planes,,,,now all u gotta do is believe your government are always the good guys and they will put intrude more into your life ,and you will let them,,,,now my friend ,u stay in hollywood land where your/our government are always honest,good ,,,regardless of history and what it tells us,,yes?good.
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@12weasel100 our governments the good guys remember? dont question anything,,,the west is automatically the good guys yes? our governments have never plotted fake attacks to pursue something else yes?put your head back in the sand,,u hate anything that questions blatant bullshit,in doing so u r defending the same crooks who are bombarding u with lies,,u wud willingly let your government take every bit of freedom u got,in order to protect you from "terrorists" who want to take your freedoms.hmmm
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@martynjhorne I never made any comments about the government good or bad. There are no issues with asking questions. The problem with you assholes is when you are provided with answers that conflict with all your bullshit lies you refuse to listen to. There is a difference between asking questions to learn and asking questions like a Truther that just wants to be able to hear their own voice and spew out shit. If you ask then you should be willing to listen something Truthers fail to do.
12weasel100 7 months ago
@12weasel100 theyre answers? theyre weak and theyre 1 dimensional,hence why i suspect most "truthers" are far beyond silly reasoning and dont give silly reasoning the time of day,study history,conspiricies,yeah,not,theory though,,,go study these people and what they write about
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@martynjhorne yes THERE are answers and they only seem weak to the weak minded. You clearly have no education and have deluded little paranoid thoughts. You need help you sad pathetic fool.
12weasel100 7 months ago
@12weasel100 ad hominem,,,insults eh? stay servile,your government love you,,,yes they do.Ignore history,ignore theyre double speak ,ignore real historical facts,,,bask in your ignorance,thats the culture and behaviour uve been sold ,lap it up
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@martynjhorne no I do not ignore facts or history. Facts clearly show that 911 was not an inside job and not controlled demo. You idiots on the other hand are trying to rewrite history through bullshit none of it has any facts to back up anything you claim. And I am not "insulting you randomly" your responses clearly show paranoid deluded thoughts you need professional help. You fucking moron (again not a random insult your responses clearly show you are a fucking moron)
12weasel100 7 months ago
@12weasel100 grow up,,,uve been spoon fed your government are your parents,go to them ,suck their teets,,,im not banging my head against a wall ,bye/fuck off/stay servile/dont reply/.....remember the boogeyman will get u if u dont put every aspect of your life in your friendly governments hands.
martynjhorne 7 months ago
@martynjhorne why is it that everyone one of you fucking idiots make people retype the same thing over and over.I guess it is because you are too fucking stupid to understand things when told to you the first time.As I have already written I have not made any comments for or against the government. I have an education that I use to examine all the facts and it is clear that you idiots have no facts. And as I have written your response shows paranoid deluded thoughts you shoud seek help You moron
12weasel100 7 months ago
@12weasel100
"why is it that everyone one of you fucking idiots make people retype the same thing over and over.I guess it is because you are too fucking stupid to understand things when told to you the first time."
LOL! Exactly.
thx1138aa 7 months ago
Comment removed
12weasel100 7 months ago
@thx1138aa sorry dude thought you were someone else
12weasel100 7 months ago
@martynjhorne another deluded paranoid response with no facts to back up any of the bullshit you spew out. You are one sad deluded moron.
12weasel100 7 months ago
beware of government sock puppet software on here
martynjhorne 7 months ago
Awesome Video.
AnonymousWhitePerson 7 months ago
Larry admitted pulling WTC7. ABC cameramen filmed the shaped charges going on, seen as flashes of light in windows going straight up from floor to floor. Geological measurments measured the ground shake from explosions before planes hit. Many witnesses say and heard explosions before the planes hit. In films, squibs are seen explosing in 9/11 footage. Military-grade nanothermite was found in the dust surrounding the WTC on 9/11. There's no doubt it was a controlled demolition - none.
MostMagnificentOne 7 months ago
@MostMagnificentOne you are a fucking retard. Larry did not admit to pulling WTC7. Pulling it is not a term used for controlled demo. Pulling a building means attaching cables to the building and using heavy equipment to pull it down. Or in your deluded state did you see big cables attached to WTC7. Also Larry did not say he pulled it. He clearly says the fire chief made the decision to pull it (or do you think the fire chief is now involved also) and he was refering to the fire operation (cont)
12weasel100 7 months ago
@MostMagnificentOne (continued) you are a fucking joke and a fucking loser. What Larry stated and what he was referring to has been clearly explained a long time ago yet you still use this as some type of argument to prove controlled demo. If Larry really meant destroy the building then the insurance companies that are a hell of a lot smarter than your stupid ass would not have paid out. You clearly are a deluded fucking retarded asshole of a moron.
12weasel100 7 months ago
We Are Change is a group of deluded fucking idiots. Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 8 months ago
@12weasel100 As We Are Change begins to get more popular i'm seeing more and more comments like this. The Shills have taken notice i guess.
astralwalk 8 months ago
@astralwalk no We Are Change has not been growing in popularity. Their support has been in steady decline. And just because someone does not agree with their bullshit it does not mean that person is a paid govt agent or "shill". Only deluded paranoid fucking idiots believe that anytime someone disagrees with them then that person must be a govt agent. Those of us that disagree with this bullshit are not govt agents we are people with an education that are smarter than these stupid assholes
12weasel100 8 months ago
@12weasel100 No their getting more popular. More chapters are opening up everywhere. What is so bad about holding people accountable? The official story of 9/11 is so full of holes only truly asleep people believe it.
astralwalk 8 months ago
@astralwalk no they are not getting more popular. At the height of the movement in 2006 it was somewhere around 46% of the people thought there was something not right with the offical story. Today that number is somewhere around 4-5% of the people. So unless you think 4% is a larger number than 46% (you probably do in some deluded way) then it is obvious that people do not believe the bullshit you Truthers spew out. Because you have no facts to back anything you claim. You moron.
12weasel100 7 months ago
@12weasel100 There are plenty of facts and evidence
astralwalk 7 months ago
@astralwalk no there are no facts that support controlled demo. If there were you would use them instead of quoting stupid catch phrases like "shills", "wake up" or "you are asleep" that the rest of you truther sheep herd use. So then what facts do you have that clearly proves controlled demo (no bullshit quotes from AETruth that is made up lies and opinions but proven facts based on proven concepts). I know you will respond with more bullshit and lies you moron.
12weasel100 7 months ago
@12weasel100
Yeah, it's pretty funny and ironic that it's the twoofers who turn out to be the real pack animals.
"Silverstein said 'pull it'. Baaa baaaaa."
"Nanothermite was used. Baaa baaaaa."
"The Pentagon hole was too small. Baaaa baaaa."
thx1138aa 7 months ago
@thx1138aa I know it is funny how they all chant "911 Was an Inside Job" or "wake up" or "troll, shill etc" on every video they see, march around like mindless idiots chanting at Ground Zero and will guide you to watch only certain videos or listen to only certain people or read only certain books and websites but then resort to calling people that disagree with all there bullshit when they cannot produce any facts to back up any of their bullshit claims sheep.
Truthers- the real sheep.
12weasel100 7 months ago
@12weasel100 I don't necessarily support the controlled demolition theory, and nowhere did I say I did. I have no doubt a vast power of illusion was exercised on people that day for various insane reasons. Honestly there are just far, far too many things wrong with the 9/11 official story for it to be the truth of what happened. And really, I don't care what you want to believe.
astralwalk 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@astralwalk so you don't believe in controlled demo but you believe 911 was an inside job so you think the terrorist were in on it too now???? You Truther idiots keep making up bullshit and each time it is proven wrong you keep changing your story so you can continue to live this deluded little fantasy that the world is the cause of your own short comings. You are a sad group of idiots.
12weasel100 7 months ago
@Hotters70601ben because Obama got elected,, he is their messiah no need to protest anything anymore,, he is the one
ikambor 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCKING GAY ASS MUSIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OMGITSDRJESUS 8 months ago
Truth Movement R.I.P.
mikeyt34 8 months ago
ur the best guys!! world need more activists like you...
i hardly try to spread the word here in spain but if people is sceptic there...imagine here, they dont care!!
kastillo17 8 months ago
GREAT JOB!!!!GREEZ FROM GERMANY!!!
Danielson1606 9 months ago
nothing will happen these guys own the law
endracismguy 9 months ago
I love it when conspiracy kooks claim their “movement” is growing. Yeah, sure it is. 911 Truth was not an issue in the 2008 US presidential election. There has been no election in the USA in which it has been an issue. Street demonstrations can't get more than a handful of people out. AE911truth does nothing except look for names for a petition and raise money. There is no mention of this 911 conspiracy crap in any engineering or construction textbook used anywhere on Earth. Nice going, kooks.
bagintree 10 months ago
@bagintree FOX NEWS: Larry Silverstein Asked Insurance Co to Allow Controlled Demolition watch this video. it's news footage of larry silverstein admitting that he told a demolition company to bring down tower 7. u may not share the same belief with truthers but they are more patriotic for asking these hard questions than someone who sees inconsistencies and still holds to an obvious lie. there are too many questions to follow blindly wouldn't u say?
dawatcha100 10 months ago
@dawatcha100 When it became clear WTC 7 was so unstable that it was likely to collapse, Silverstein very publicly asked if there wasn't some way to have a last minute demolition in order to prevent damage to surrounding buildings. If that was a possibility, then he wanted to be sure insurance would cover it. That plan never went forward because demo experts told him a last minute demo would be impossible.
But leave it to "truthers" to distort the whole thing and tell blatant lies.
bagintree 10 months ago
I served on the DMZ in Korea and I also served in Vietnam and I am a disabled Veteran because I broke my back while serving and now I am ashamed that every served, because I was made to watch you the American bow down like the cowards you are and allowed another Coward George W Bush accomplish what no army could, He took the constitution and spit on it and took away our rights. Thank you American citizens for spiting upon us veterans both living and dead.
Fitzlight62 10 months ago
can you all chill. i knew people that died in those towers....the honest truth is that psychos flew planes into buildings. get over it. america is hated by everyone. and thats the truth.
zeekX141 10 months ago
@zeekX141 the government LOVES people like you.stand in line, shut your mouth, obey orders and believe what we tell you.
bubbilicious429 10 months ago
@bubbilicious429 i dont stand in line. im actually as close to an anarchist as you can get without being an anarchist. sure the government has done horrid things. but yall are conspiracy theorist. when you can actually prove by showing me explosive devises that were in the building ill believe. but your logic and theory has to many flaws
zeekX141 10 months ago
@zeekX141 Thermite or Thermate military grade. That what was coming out of the buildings before they came down and why there was molten metal under the rubble. The molten metal under the rubble was 700+ degrees 2 months after. it's on youtube.It will tell you what you need to know. it was found in the dust that a whole lot of people gathered and had it analyzed. Found traces of Thermite.
The10man1 10 months ago
@The10man1 the only problem with your theory is that you say jet fuel wont melt metal. which you are wrong because jet fuel burns at 900 degrees Cel and all is it would need to do is weaken the metal enough so that several thousands of ton could come crashing down! also it seems that you will believe anything that someone who is for the non popular idea.
zeekX141 10 months ago
@zeekX141 the so-called truth of the gov't has too many flaws. u know that they won't be able to show explosive devices because there was no access by anyone who would've checked for them. the firefighters and people there reported hearing explosions from the lower levels of the towers. are they lying also to support a conspiracy theory. this is shown in the news footage from that day. too many questions to accept the given story also.
dawatcha100 10 months ago
@dawatcha100 Explosions are common in fires. Explosions don't automatically = explosives. Looks like you were unaware of that. Glad I could help educate you.
bagintree 10 months ago
@bagintree yeah but the explosions were on the lower levels. things that explode in a fire are usually in the fire or subject to the heat from the fire. the lower levels of world trade center were far from the heat and fire and the firemen were a few levels above the explosions. looks like you were unaware of that. glad i could help educate you.
dawatcha100 10 months ago
@dawatcha100 There were explosions on lower levels from the jet fuel-ignited fireballs that traveled down the elevator shafts and blew out elevator doors on various lower level floors. Looks like you were unaware of that too. Glad I could educate you again.
bagintree 10 months ago
@bagintree Do you have evidence to back up this statement? I'm not trying to antagonize, I honestly want to know if this is true or if you are just making wild assumptions.
STNKbone 9 months ago
@STNKbone This guy compiled witness accounts from dozens of sources and found that 64 people on 43 levels below the impact zones reported smelling or contacting jet fuel/kerosene on these floors, while 33 people on 18 levels below the impact zones reported seeing fireballs coming from elevator shafts or down hallways
sites. google. com/site/911stories/insidethetowers:summaryofwitnessaccounts
At the bottom of the page is a link to the quotes.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree How? The elevator shafts and stairwells were airtight. A fireball wouldn't have enough oxygen to get all the way down.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 Yeah, I guess all those witnesses were just lying, right?
Or maybe, just maybe, the elevator shafts weren't really airtight and whoever you got that from was feeding you bullshit.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree Well it's all about how our brains percieve the universe. If someone actually thinks that they barely saw a fireball shoot through them with all that dust, they'll want to believe that they saw it. Then if someone else (such as the government) tells them that there were fireballs, then their brain can actually hallucinate and believe this because the belief is "set in stone" in the person's cerebral cortex.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 Oh, I see. So if the government told you there were fireballs even though you didn't see any, you'd believe you saw them? I don't think they could convince me of that, but apparently you think they'd be able to convince you.
Gee! The government sure got to those people quickly! Good thing none of them reported the government tried to force them what to think.
Hey, did the gov't tell these witnesses to report that they smelled kerosene at the site of the blown out elevators too?
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree When they were told that there was tons of jetfuel released, they would think "hmm, maybe I did smell jetfuel." As you contemplate the idea, it would evolve in your brain and seem true.
Also, there WERE people who said things that contradicted the government's origional claims. Sadly, they all died mysteriously within a year. (Barry Jennings, Kennith Johannson, etc.)
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 Someone must have got to those witnesses IMMEDIATELY because they told reporters they smelled kerosene. Man, what an amazing job those fictitious conspirators did. Not only did they magically fly the planes into the building but they hypnotized everyone into believing they saw fireballs and smelled kerosene. I guess they hypnotized people into believing the elevators were blown out too. Incredible job and you're the only one who's seen through it! Congratulations!!!
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree Some reported Kerosine, some reported Cordine. Pretty much every witness at the Pentagon reported cordine. However, there was a witness who said that what she saw hitting the pentagon wasn't a plane. However as soon as she got to the hospital, there were two men who walked into her room and asked her what she saw. They kept insisting that it was a plane, but she kept saying no it wasn't. They told her to just shut up and take the compensation money.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 You mean cordite? Nope, no one reported smelling that at the twin towers. And you're wrong that "pretty much every witness at the Pentagon reported" it. Just one guy did. You're sure getting a lot of things wrong.
As for what hit the Pentagon, hundreds of people saw the plane. Oh wait! They were all hypnotized into saying it, right? Just like the people at the twin towers who saw fireballs and smelled kerosene. All hypnotized by the CIA!.
You got a great imagination!
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree Eyewitness reports aren't the most credible. One woman reported seing a freaking helicopter hitting the pentagon.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 "Eyewitness reports aren't the most credible"
You're right. When there's just one or two, they're not that credible. But there were dozens of witness statements and hundreds, if not thousands of people in morning rush hour traffic on I-395 and nearby roads saw FL 77. There's no evidence the plane went anywhere other than the Pentagon. Absolutely none.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree There isn't. When people started to hear what was going on, they found out that planes were hitting buildings, they could start to say. "OH! That was a plane! I get it now!" If you watch amateur vids of people after the explosion, some were talking about it being a missile.
Most pilots started to wave their bs flags when they heard the official story of the pentagon
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 No one said it looked like a missile.
If you think people can be brainwashed by media reports, you're revealing more about yourself than about others. You're basically admitting that YOU could be brainwashed by media reports.
Most pilots? Nonsense.
There's no evidence FL77 went anywhere other than the Pentagon. None.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree "We heard what sounded like a missile" -Tom Seibert
"I was convinced that it was a missile." -Lou Rains
Basically, Hani Hanjour was barely able to control a Cessna 171. A Cessna 171 and a Boeing 757 have two entirely different cockpits. Most pilots have failed at pulling this off in flight simulators. Winds would leave you and you'd end up crashing. There were no skidmarks on the Pentagon lawn. The most secrure building on earth, and a potato shoots better vids than the one given.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 I repeat, no one said it looked like a missile. The examples you gave were people who said it SOUNDED like a missile. Guess how many of the dozens of eyewitness statements said it looked like a missile? Zero.
So now you're claiming FL77 hit the Pentagon but Hanjour wasn't at the controls? I thought you claimed it was a missile. If it was a missile, then how could a 757 be making the supposedly difficult maneuver into the Pentagon?
"no skidmarks"
So what?
bagintree 9 months ago
@kidkong584
Let's review.
1. You claimed WTC elevator shafts were "airtight." FALSE
2. You claimed pretty much every witness at the Pentagon reported cordine (You meant cordite?) FALSE
3. You claimed "most pilots" started to wave their bs flags about the official story. FALSE
4. You claimed WTC witnesses never really saw fireballs or smelled kerosene & instead yielded to government suggestions about those things. NONSENSE MADE UP BY YOU.
You're getting lots of things wrong.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree
1. They were airtight just in case this type of thing would happen. Most skyscrapers are airtight.
2. Yes. I've yet to see a report in which someone said they smelt kerosene.
3. Several have tried it in simulations. Some tried prior to 9/11 (including the pilot that flew flight 77...) None were able to hit it.
4. The human mind is extrememly suceptable to hallucinations. That's a scientific fact. Look up "The Truth about Lies" It's a CBS vid.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584
1. Who says they were airtight?
2. Thanks for admitting you got the "cordine" claim wrong.
3. Thanks for admitting your claim about "most pilots" was wrong. As for flying a plane into a building, what's so hard about that?
4. "The human mind is extremely suceptable to hallucinations" Maybe, but how could hundreds of people have the same hallucination? Makes no sense. Hundreds saw FL 77 hit the Pentagon. Many saw fireballs & smelled kerosene in the twin towers.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree I never admitted that I got the cordine claim wrong.
None have been able to hit the Pentagon in recreations on flight simulators.
Most of the people that reported seeing a plane said it was a commuter plane, not a 757.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 "I never admitted that I got the cordine claim wrong."
You claimed pretty much every witness at the Pentagon reported cordine. That's incorrect. Plus, you made the error of calling it cordine when in fact it's cordite. Looks like you are unable to admit any of your errors, and you're making A LOT of them.
"Most of the people that reported seeing a plane said it was a commuter plane."
False. You got another one wrong.
Can you back up ANY of your claims? Any at all?
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree
1)Well sorry that I didn't have the chemical down correctly. I'm only 14, so I won't be taking chem for another two years.
2) I've only seen about two claims saying that it was a 757. Most said that it was a commuter plane. There are some different reports though. Some reported a missile, some reported a helicopter, and there were one or two that reported a Boeing 757.
Just one question though. If the footage is real, than why didn't it leave skidmarks flying that low?
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584
Most eyewitnesses said it was a commercial jetliner. None said they saw a missile. Only a couple said they thought they saw a smaller plane. If you google Pentagon eyewitnesses you'll find the lists of witnesses and what they saw.
Thanks for admitting you got the chemical wrong, but you're still wrong in your claim that "pretty much every witness at the Pentagon" reported it.
I don't know why there weren't skidmarks. I'm not a crash site investigator or aeronautical engineer.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree I've only seen one or two reports of a 757. That turn was too complex for someone who couldn't handle a Cessna 171 (I'm 14 and can control one) to pull off. On September 10, Rumsfeld said that we were missing $2.4 trillion in debt. This debt dissappeared after 9/11.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 Most people can't identify a 757, but they can identify a commercial jetliner and they did. Some even noted the AA markings on it.
People saw the plane crash into the Pentagon so evidently the turn wasn't too complex.
You sure are getting a lot of things wrong. The unaccounted for funds at the Pentagon were well known before Rumsfeld's announcement. The sums mounted over the years. And no, the debt didn't disappear after 9/11. You must be relying on some terrible info sources.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree Are you talking about people like Mike Walters? His interview has been debunked several times. He reported seeing a plane fly in front of him, him reading the logo, then seeing it take out the rest of the lightpoles and fly across the field to slam into the building. He later said that the wings folded back towards the fueslage and slammed into the building. Only one problem. His view would have been fully obstructed by a couple of trees. No way he could have seen it.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 No, his view wasn't obstructed by trees. You made that up.
You've got dozens of eyewitness reports to try to dismiss. Get going. Who should we believe about what they saw - them or you? They have credibility on the matter. You don't.
Remember, there's absolutely no evidence that FL77 went anywhere other than the Pentagon.
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree His view was directly obstructed by trees. If he was able to see the AA on the side of the plane, he would have had to have been behind the trees. Several of these witnesses were at the exact same vantage point. Directly behind the trees. Mike's was the most famous because he's tried to refute the conspiracies, but he's continually failed. Also, most of these reports that you're talking about were by people that worked for USA Today. All on the same highway.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 His view was not obstructed. He had no reason to lie. He is one of dozens of witness statements and one of hundreds, if not thousands, who saw the plane fly into the Pentagon. They worked at all kinds of places, not just USA Today. You've got your work cut out for you trying to refute all those witnesses. Were they all lying for some reason? I think they have more credibility than you do.
So now everyone at USA Today are part of the plot? You're hilarious.
bagintree 9 months ago
@kidkong584 I just wanted to remind you that you made this claim:
"Most of the people that reported seeing a plane said it was a commuter plane."
Then you made this claim:
"most of these reports that you're talking about were by people that worked for USA Today"
So that means most of the people at USA Today said they saw a commuter plane. If you believe people who work at USA Today were part of a plot, then why would they say they saw a commuter plane?
bagintree 9 months ago
@bagintree No, most of the people that reported seeing a plane were by people who worked for USA Today. (btw I said "Most of the reports THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT." All of these reporters were coming into work late that day (although they were all within .16 of a mile from each other driving to work...) and saw this. Most of their accounts have been called invalid because of their vantage points.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@kidkong584 So most of the USA Today reporters said it was a commuter plane? I haven't seen any evidence of that.
There are dozens of eyewitness reports from people who worked at a variety of places. Nearly all of them said they saw a jetliner. Most of them DID NOT work for USA Today. You're getting lots of things wrong. Why don't you actually read the witness statements instead of repeating some garbage you found on Joe Blow's unaccountable web site?
bagintree 9 months ago
@kidkong584 USA Today was located north of the Pentagon, while the eyewitnesses in rush hour traffic on I-395 were south of the Pentagon. Completely different people.
bagintree 9 months ago
@zeekX141 it doesn't matter that u knew people who died in the building. that doesn't mean that u know what the truth is. america is hated by many nations and there is a reason for it but that doesn't change the fact that there are more questions with the given story than there are answers. it is the job of a patriot to make sure that our government is held accountable for injustice and this requires the courage to ask questions not smart remarks and anger. those who ask do us all a service.
dawatcha100 10 months ago
@dawatcha100 but now you are trying to pull blame from something and make the GOV a distraction. sure the GOV is a huge prob. but theres no way you can fake what happened. 9/11 happened. get over it. people saw with their own eyes what happened. anyways the facts for this have to low of a probability.
zeekX141 10 months ago
I'm guessing you didn't do that quick search that was suggested.. you are obviously still blinded by power. Look at how fast the dollar has dropped, ever heard of "inflation"? We are going into extreme debt, and it is mathematically impossible to get out of it. "Get a lobotomy you fucking idiot." Sounds like yours didn't work.
akkingpin1 10 months ago
All this video proves is that dorks continue to like Evanescence.
Hyuiolosa 10 months ago
LOL GOOD JOB C.H.A.N.G.E.....YOU SURE SHOWED HIM.........NOT !!!! ..HEY HOW COME HE'S NOT IN JAIL YET ? YOU SAID HE WAS GOING TO JAIL ? STAY ANGRY !
Smokey0791 10 months ago
DON'T BE JEALOUS OF PEOPLE WITH MONEY FOLKS....IF LARRY WAS IN ON A CONSPIRACY, BELIEVE ME , HIS INSURANCE COMPANY WOULDN'T BE PAYING HIM OFF..NO INSIDE JOB...SORRY TO DISAPPOINT
Smokey0791 10 months ago
Bunch of fucking idiots supporting claims that have been blatantly disproved.
Baskinrobems 10 months ago
@Baskinrobems Hha by what a yellow journalist organization popular machanics? Dude just do your self a favor and maybe take a high school physics class. It would do wonders on your critical thinking abilities.I believe last time i checked "pancake theory" is yiddish for BULLSHIT.
northwestblazinfire 10 months ago
@northwestblazinfire Yeah well anyone with a highschool degree can tell you 9/11 wasn't an inside job. The only thing you guys can hold on to is that we dont know everything about WTC 7. All your other "facts" have been disproven. Put aside your hate for the government and look at the obvious you fucking dumbass.
Baskinrobems 10 months ago
@Baskinrobems You have got to be fucking joking right? "All your other "facts" have been disproven", it is the complete opposite. Retards like you are the ones who continue to self destruct this country, I bet you didn't know if we didn't invade Iraq for the oil, our economy would have collapsed WITHIN 10 years? Look that shit up stupid cunt
akkingpin1 10 months ago
@akkingpin1 You realize all you did was say "NO THEY'RE NOT MY FACTS ARE PROVEN!!! LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!" And that other little "fact" you throughout is complete bullshit. And even if it were true thats complete and shaky speculation and I doubt the government would kill thousands of its own citizens for it. Also I'm sure they were able to predict our economy in 10 years but not be able to predict the housing collapse. Get a lobotomy you fucking idiot.
Baskinrobems 10 months ago
@northwestblazinfire YEAH THE GOV'T HATCHED A PLOT FOR THE BUILDINGS TO COLLAPSE...AND IT'S SO OBVIOUS THEY CAN'T COLLAPSE FROM IMPACT/FIRE/CONSTRUCTION LIKE YOU TRUTHERS SAY...BUT THEY THOUGHT THEY COULD GET EVERYBODY TO BELIEVE SUCH AN OBVIOUS IMPOSSIBILITY...LOL YEAH RIGHT STFU CONSPIRACY CLOWNS
Smokey0791 10 months ago
@northwestblazinfire "maybe take a high school physics class"
I love it when the conspiracy kooks try to claim they're on the side of physicists. If that were true, where are all the physicists? Are they all remaining silent about what they know to be true because they're afraid of being assassinated by the CIA? Sure bet.
bagintree 10 months ago
@bagintree try physics911
KellieSmunt 10 months ago
@bagintree LOL
I love it when ignorant rednecks try to act like they even know what the science of physics is. Dude do your self a favor, for christs sake READ A BOOK. Stop acting like you know anything at all, just stick to what you know, which is stuff like which gun is better at killing things the Ak-47 or M-16. Real topics are left to real critical thinkers now run alonge and shoot something.
northwestblazinfire 10 months ago
@northwestblazinfire LMAO! So you can't answer the question either. If the mainstream version of what happened on 9/11 violates the laws of physics, then where are all the physicists?
All you could do is post irrelevant nonsense. But thanks for trying.
bagintree 10 months ago
@bagintree You are obviously retarded, do a QUICK, yes fucking QUICK search of 911 physics in google, and find ONE architech, engineer, physicist, scientist, ect you get the point, who DOESN'T agree with the REAL facts on 911, not the ones the government has been feeding us, stupid fucking idiot. We are NOT remaining silent, people are stepping up one by one, and all of them come back with the same conclusions, THE WTC TOWERS WERE TAKEN DOWN BY NANO THERMITE dumb bitch
akkingpin1 10 months ago
@northwestblazinfire Indeed, the Pancake theory is the closest NIST can come to figuring out what happened, without testing for explosives and so forth. The biggest flaw in the pancake theory is the top part of the building turns into dust, AND they DO NOT explain what happened to the center fucking collums, anyone with 1/4 a brain can tell there is some MAJOR FUCKING flaws in their report that NEED to be addressed, along with them caught LYING about their "Hypothesis" and avoiding the "FACTS"
akkingpin1 10 months ago 2
White college punks accuse an innocent man of Mass Murder
*spit*
AlQaedaIsReal 11 months ago
piss-ant young white college punks feel all tough blaming an innocent man of Mass Murder
*spit*
AlQaedaIsReal 11 months ago
Comment removed
xavierignatius 11 months ago
...a bunch of piss-ant white college kids thinking they are sooo tough by blaming an innocent man of Mass Murder
*spit*
AlQaedaIsReal 11 months ago
Building 7 is the proof.
Pull it.
buggsmalone 11 months ago
911 was an inside j ob.
buggsmalone 11 months ago
over 9 years and "truthers" still can't agree on who, how, and why.
over 9 years and they still can't debunk the Fact that Islamic Terrorists did it.
AlQaedaIsReal 11 months ago
@AlQaedaIsReal
"over 9 years and "truthers" still can't agree on who, how, and why"
Yep, they keep repeating the same old lies, pseudo-science, and baseless assertions in their little echo chamber. They are doomed to their rightful place as a sociological oddity alongside moon landing denial and creationism.
bagintree 11 months ago
@bagintree
How does fire simultaneously destroy 57 perimeter and 25 core columns leading to 2.25 seconds (32 metres) of pure freefall?
Why can't you answer, cocksucker?
LMFAO!
Concession accepted, coward.....LOL!
noozilander 11 months ago
@noozilander There's no evidence of any explosives at WTC 7, and unlike in a CD, only 15% of the collapse was at freefall.
You forgot to mention that the firefighters said the building was unstable and leaning. I know you want to pound your fist on the table and cry Nooooo! But that's true.
I'm pleased to destroy you again.
bagintree 11 months ago