Added: 4 years ago
From: class3weapons
Views: 82,863
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Still even though the sonic crackling sound is ever present, someone at the receiving end would get a 180 degree sound reception. In other words they still won't have a clue where it came from

  • Camra mics dont do suppressors justice

  • that is AWESOME. from targets perspective, all you hear is the bullet whizzing by. I'd hate to be the target.

  • Don't let these fella's get you down. Everyone who has made the TERRIBLE mistake of paying for it knows that subsonic ammunition BLOWS. Nice video though. And is that an I-beam you were shooting at?

  • Beautiful. If you were the hostile, you'd NEVER know where that was coming from.

  • very cool from target's perspective

  • How long does it take to get a license for this kinda gun?

  • "Tax Paid " application takes 15 weeks.

  • your speakers are fucked then.

  • I've got both the M4-02 and the G5 by GemTech. They are excellent!

  • like $525

  • sweet i've always wondered what the targets perspective would be being shot at with 5.56 its hitting you before you even hear it

  • @NolanMGI you dont hear it when you get shot in the head ...... you just go like this (who turn off the light then you dead you mama cry)

  • Very nice. What does it retail for?

  • The suppressor was highly effective. You can really tell the supersonic crack of the bullet when the muzzle blast is tamed.

  • Standard .223 is greater than 1050 fps. The natural laws of physics dictate that you can only do so much to attenuate noise.

  • Its not that man. In order to get true sound attentuation you need to use the supressor in conjunction with the proper ammo. The reason why people say there is not that much of a difference is because there is not that much of a difference if you did not change your ammo because the round still goes super sonic. You would have needed to have gotten some sub-sonic 5.56 in order to really show the difference.

  • Yes, but unfortunately using subsonic 5.56 ammunition really defeats the purpose of using such a powerful rifle. I mean, standard 9x19 ammo isn't even subsonic. I think the speed if sound is roughly 1,100 FPS (don't quote me, but it's AROUND there), so weakening 5.56 to that point you might as well not even be using 5.56 anymore because it's going to be inaccurate, it's probably going to tumble a bit, it won't fragment properly AT ALL, etc.

  • why did you use standard ammo with silencer??? why didnt you use sub-sonic ammo????

  • I used standard ammo because thats what I wanted to use to show the difference suppressed and unsuppressed standard ammo.

  • what are the difference between the 2 ammo?

  • great video

  • how much was it

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more