Added: 5 years ago
From: jpass2424
Views: 362,999
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (15,395)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • watch?v=EtPC0W4HII8 <----- Tell me Larry Silverstein is not hiding something..

  • wow, if it were a inside job and silverstein said to "pull it" meaning to blow it up, you would think he would not say it on tv? Way to go America for showing the world how much we are idiots! Inside job? Please, it was because our support for Israel that got us attacked, and stupid fucks like you guys are the reason why!

  • @BaldurdashWoW So Britain's support for us in 1940 got itself attacked by Germany, huh? That's your logic. Do you not understand the concept of Friends and Allies? Better yet, how about NATO? An attack on one member country is an attack on the rest. We support Israel because they are the only true democracy in the region and we have mutual suport for our values. Can't say that for the Palestinian mongrals.

  • @ThrashTillDeath73 Dude, you are mistaken my words as anti Israel, which is not what I am saying at all. What I am trying to tell people is that we were attacked because we allied ourselves with Israel, and the Muslim nations did not agree with what we were doing, so they attacked us. By taking away that and saying that the US government did 9/11 is dangerous and very stupid to say the least!

  • pull down - To demolish; destroy: pull down an old office building. pull down 1. To pull down or break up so that reconstruction is impossible: demolish, destroy, dismantle, dynamite, knock down, level, pulverize, raze, tear down, wreck

    I was trying to load a web address so that this definition would be taken in context but the computer wouldn't let me.

  • @amishnation He didnt say "pull down."

    Idiot.

  • i also use that term with my girlfriend i tell her to pull it all the time

  • If he called for the World Trade Centers to be demolished, why would we agree to do an interview on PBS? Better yet, why would he say on camera for PBS, "I told them to pull it" if he was responsible? You'd think he would have been far more cautious with his words knowing he's doing an interview about 9/11 for PBS.

  • No tall steel building has EVER collapsed due to fire, even if fully engaged with fire for days. Do the research and you'll see. Building 7 was demolition. So were the towers...the story is "the planes & fire caused their collapse" to cover the demolitions. Since the 5th plane failed to take off from Logan & crash into Building 7, the question arose "No plane hit it, so what do we do?...the explosives are in place & they'll find them"...no choice, they demo it anyway & blame it on the fires.

  • @Tomaji69

    You are on the mark, we are asked to swallow lies all the time, this is part of a large mechanization of the Globalist that planned this 10 years in advance, they had the stage set and expected "Patriotism" to numb our minds about the cold-hard FACTS that this event could no way happen. Hard core RW & LW are in on it together- they are all part of the same vumture that shits and pukes on us all, and gobbles up our flesh.

  • @Tomaji69 Yes, building 7 was pulled. Show me an official denial of that?

  • @BitinDawg

    uh, anyone can see there were no cables. If you need an "official denial" of that well that's your problem, not the Government.

  • @AlQaedaIsReal LOL i think the owner of the building would know if they pulled it or not.. fucking idiot.

  • @prodigy051985

    Or should I say: Larry Silverstein is so powerful. Jews have Lizard power, ya know

  • @AlQaedaIsReal dude you are a fucking joke.. a sheep.. who believes everything the media tells him.. i bet if fox news and cnn told you that jesus was fisting santa clause in the land of narnia you would believe it.. silverstein got about a 3 billion dollar settlement off 3000 lives.. fucking dirty jewish troll. low self esteem? you're american so i already know you inbred.

  • @AlQaedaIsReal ps are you a jew? it would explain alot. 

  • @AlQaedaIsReal it makes me sick that you actually believe this guy.. watch other videos.. his story changes, and he wouldn't even fully talk about it.. if people like you are the majority of people living in the states, the us might actually be the DUMBEST place on earth..

  • @prodigy051985 ps.. the only thing thats a hoax is your government.. run by greedy rich fuckers who don't give rats ass about you.. only oil and opium. lol you invade afghasnistan for 10 years not even knowing where osama is?? its unbelievable what your country believes.. its going to be really funny when you're country is actually attacked by arabs. im going to laugh.

  • @Tomaji69 watch?v=_7rj5UQvlWw

    Please watch, and then explain why his analysis is wrong.

  • @Tomaji69 You're full of shit. So tell me genius...what happens to ANY structure if the fires are not extinguished. I don't care what they're made of. Fire is HEAT...Heat EXPANDS material...also makes the material weaker. This includes Metal AND Concrete. Why do Concrete ROADS crack? The continual expansion and contraction of the concrere under changing temp conditions. Take your head out of your ass and use common sense.

  • @ThrashTillDeath73 - Oh, look everyone - we have an immature alpha male who swears at you to intimidate you so that he "wins". Won't work dickhead. Do your research about tall steel building structures. YOUR head is in YOUR ass, mine read up on it before I wrote my comment. You read the "story" and believe it. Why do you think 1,500 engineers are organized and speaking out? Just google it and take 20 mins on it. There are websites with expanded history of such fires.

  • @Tomaji69 Oh look. We have a immature moron who whined about TrashTillDeath because she couldnt refute any of it!

    Why cant the 1500 engineers (actually most are students, and about 4 actually have experience in high rise engineering) pass peer review? With 10s of millions of similar professionals worldwide, why is it less than 1/10th of 1% actually try to sell kookspiracy stories?

    Why are there more people who believe the Earth is flat than engineers peddling 911 kookspiracies?

  • @Tomaji69 1500 engineers out of how many world-wide? Yeah, thought so...

    Why can't you idiots just accept what your lying eyes saw on that terrible day? Why do you have to make up conspiracy theories that make absolutely no sense when looked at a more deep level than what you see at the surface.

    Controlled demolition for any building? Please.... It takes months planning for demolitions, plus setting up charges...how come no one has ever claimed to see engineers setting them up?

  • Yeah, "pull it"! He wasn't talking about his finger. Wake up folks!

  • The geatest Lie of XXI century and only 361k views???

  • larry sliverstain is an evil jew. a real terrorist and enemy of the world

  • OMG OMFG this site is still up?!?

    "THEY made the decision to pull" [the men and equipment away from the building]

    Now, fer Christ's sake, go get laid. all of you

  • @AlQaedaIsReal pull it, not pull back. "Pull it" is a terminology used within the demolition trade. It's obvious meaning is to begin with the demolition. now go get laid, don't question, have a beer, that's right. now watch some sports and fall asleep knowing that your whole world is a lie. Now i'm gonna tell you to wake up, quit defending the rogue element within our governments.

  • @iamthepiratesignal ""Pull it" is a terminology used within the demolition trade."

    False. There are NO verified uses of this term, as a slag for "controlled demolition" EVER.

  • @EdgemanLL2 yes of course it is. i actually met some of these guys (demo experts) when i was a kid in school and they took lots of time explaining what they did. they had other creative terms for demo including "blow jobs". blow jobs take some time to set up too. they can't just do them on the spur of the moment.

  • @amishnation LMGDAO. Of course you did.

    I can do the same thing, idiot. "I met those same guys. They told me that they were just bullshitting you, because they knew you were a 911 Kook, and wanted you to look foolish by making wildy false claims on the net!"

    Now that we have dispensed with your fake conversations with your imaginary freinds, the answer is very simple. Show a corroborated, verified use of "pull it" used by CD pros, before 911, indicating an explo demo.

    Ill wait. =]

  • @EdgemanLL2 what an angry, irrational and hateful individual. i met the demo experts decades ago but i remember everything they said. in the 80's we had no idea anything like 911 would ever happen and i was a kid so i was still a brainwashed patriot with total faith in my government.

  • @amishnation I met the same ones too. And I remembered what they said (refer to my previous comments).

    Notably, you havent providing ANY reference to actually support the LIE that the term is used.

    Man-up bitch. If its such a common term, there should be hundreds of readily avaialble examples.

    The world awaits. =]

  • @EdgemanLL2 My buddy said that arguing on the internet is like competing in the Special Olympics (even if you win it doesn't matter) so I'm not going to do it anymore.

  • @amishnation Translation: "youre right Edge. I lied. Its not a demolition reference. And I never talked to even ONE demolition professional."

    Understood.

  • Scary to know that this guy is in charge of the new world trade center, except for The Freedom Tower which is owned by the MTA. Let's hope he won't be dissatisfied with the new world trade center.

  • What no one seems to notice is that what he's saying is impossible. The decision to pull the building must have already been made, because it takes several days to a week to pull a building of that magnitude. WTC7 was already rigged to blow at least several days to a week beforehand. Someone knew.

  • @ThegodisAbraxas Exactly. This simple fact alone reveals a cover up of 9/11.

  • @ThegodisAbraxas

    "pull the building"?!?

    Where the fuck were the cables?!?

  • So your telling me, they done a controlled demolition, with thousands of innocent people inside, also got hold of 4 jet liners, filled them to the brim with aviation fuel and ploughed them in to buildings and 1 in a field? Your telling me the man who owns them buildings... done all that....

    OK?!?

  • @sweetness00peace The owner of the buildings accidentally admits in this video that he had WTC-7 rigged for demolition weeks in advance. He supposedly ordered it pulled the day of the attack, but that is impossible since it would have taken far longer than a day to plant the necessary explosive charges. A building that size would take at least two weeks to demolish that way.

  • @ThegodisAbraxas Yeah, we're supposed to believe he "accidentally" admitted he blew up his building. Yeah, that just makes perfect sense. No wonder the twoof movement is fading away.

  • So, why did FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro make the decision to call off operations two hours before it's collapse? Why did firefighters say for the hours leading up to 5:30 PM that the building was going to collapse? Why did these same firefighters also report seeing fires on almost every floor?

  • Since when a building owner gets to decide which strategy the firemen shoul do. I think Nero is still alive and I moved in New York before 9 11.

  • a clear controlled demolition.

  • The Jews in Medieval Europe poisoned the peoples water supply and salted the Earth so crops couldn't grow!! That's why diseases and plagues roamed the land.

  • My ancestors in Europe, centuries before the NAZI's came to power, raided the landlord Jews like this, cut their head off and stuck it on a pike after they levied taxes on my people!!

  • Still waiting for the conspiracy kooks to present one piece of evidence of Silverstein's guilt or involvement in causing WTC 7 to fall. Got anything besides a misinterpretation of 2 words? "Pull it." Please tell me you've got something better than that. Anything at all?

  • @PoetryHound are you fucking serious? "pull it....and then we watched the building collapse". since he said "watch" he is clearly stating that he knew the exact time the building would collapse since he decided to "pull it". if you reply back to me arguing your very weak point then may god have mercy on your soul.

  • @stuartyy90 Yeah, sure. He just decided to announce his guilt during the taping of a documentary. That just makes perfect sense.

    The fire department made the decision to pull their crew out and then we watched the building collapse on TV. You're utterly insane if you think there's anything suspicious about that.

    Still waiting for evidence of Silverstein's guilt besides your intentional misinterpretation of two words.

  • @PoetryHound do you not notice anything strange about the collapse though?! im speaking of wtc 1 and 2 here as well and buildings DO NOT collapse because of fire. all 3 of those building were controlled demolition. oh and why didnt he say pull the crew out? he just said pull IT with IT meaning the building.

  • @stuartyy90 The collapses of the buildings are indeed remarkable, but does that automatically make them controlled demolitions? Of course not. Buildings DO NOT collapse because of fire? Really? That would certainly be news to firefighters.

    "Pull it" as in pull the firefighting crew. For the 3rd time, got any evidence of Silverstein's guilt besides your intentional misinterpretation of two words?

  • @PoetryHound can you give me examples? and I mean buildings which collapsed like wtc 1,2 or 7. okay, larry went to breakfast at 8am every day on windows but it just so happens that he was not there on sep 11th. he claims he had to go to the doctors. it just so happens that his son and daugher did not turn up to work on sep 11th either but i suppose they must have had the doctor too. also the 2 insurance policies he got just before the attack which earned him around 5 billion dollars?

  • @stuartyy90 Howard Lutnick, the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald was always at his desk every morning at the top of WTC 1. But on 9/11 he didn't go to work. Most of his staff were killed. Was Lutnick part of the conspiracy?

    All of the insurance payouts have gone to rebuilding and they're not enough. That's why Silverstein took out loans to raise more capital for the reconstruction. There's zero evidence of him pocketing a penny of the payout.

  • @PoetryHound BTW, Silverstein took out the insurance policies just 2 months before the attacks because that's when he signed the lease for the WTC complex. Standard practice.

    Did you know that he tried to insure the bldgs for just $1.6 billion, but PANY & his lenders wanted him to take out a $5.5 b policy? They compromised at $3.5 b. If he was involved in insurance fraud, he went for $1.5 b instead of $5.5 b. Not exactly the behavior of a fraudster.

  • @PoetryHound his son (Kyle) had his first day of kindergarten so he, as many parents do, took his son to school for his very first day and afterwards he would of undergone his usual daily routine. oh and thank you for those examples of building collapses....

  • @stuartyy90 Thanks for acknowledging (by your silence) that you have zero evidence of any wrongdoing by Silverstein. But I understand that if you only read Joe Blow's unaccountable 9/11 conspiracy site, you'll continue to be lost on the subject. And yep, Lutnick and Silverstein both had good reasons for not being at work.

    Skyscrapers almost never collapse. So each case is unique. So what? Got any examples of skyscrapers attacked by 500 mph jetliners used as missiles that DIDN'T collapse?

  • @PoetryHound i seriously think someone has brainwashed you into believing all this shite, i really do. how you think there is absolutely nothing strange with the building collapses on 9/11 and the pentagon for that matter, is beyond me. i also looked at your profile, did the government ask you to go on youtube and defenc their story of what happened on 9/11? since from what i have seen you go on lots of conspiracy youtube videos and slander the people questioning the government.

  • @stuartyy90 Yeah, sure. Anyone who dismisses the 9/11 conspiracy theories as a load of bullshit must surely be working for the government. I love it!

    Questioning the government is very healthy and I have no problem with it. I also think it's healthy to question the truthers, particularly when they make baseless claims like you do. Got any evidence that shows Silverstein was involved in causing 9/11 or that he profited from it? No, of course not.

  • @PoetryHound are you sitting by your computer 24/7 just waiting on my reply? i love how you just ignore the clear and valid point i just made and just move on to another point of yours hahaha, and i have just mentioned evidence from previous comments.

  • @stuartyy90 More paranoia from you. I work on my computer, so I see when you post. Big deal. But yeah, go ahead believe I'm just waiting for you if you want. More paranoia.

    So now you're not only a structural engineering expert and a demolition expert, but you're a body language expert too! Cool!

    Wait, which structural engineer says only explosives could cause the collapses? Oh, that's right. None. Just you. Typical.

    Still waiting for the evidence on Silverstein. Tic toc tic toc.

  • @PoetryHound im not paranoid haha. so what do you think caused the collapse of wtc 7? and for that matter wtc1 and 2? i would LOVE to hear your reasons. please watch this video /watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw, maybe then you will see sense.

  • @stuartyy90 Of course you're paranoid. You thought I was waiting at my computer for your comments. That's paranoia.

    Now who's jumping to a new topic? What's the matter? Can't find any evidence of Silverstein's involvement in planning 9/11? Can't find any evidence that he pocketed a penny of the insurance payouts?

    Oh, that's right. Body language. If you want to know why the 9/11 kookspiracy "movement" is fading, look no further than that. Body language. Excellent!

  • @PoetryHound ahahahah OH MY GOD. did you even watch the video?! you are actually ridiculous hahah. it is clear the collapse of wtc 1, 2 and 7 were implosions or "controlled demolitions". PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO before you comment back to me.

  • @stuartyy90 Your video does not provide a single shred of evidence that Larry Silverstein was behind 9/11 or that he pocketed any insurance payouts.

    Come on! You made those claims. Now you're running away from them. Run run run!!!

  • @PoetryHound eh i think you'll find i didnt say it did LOLOL. here is a quote from you: "Wait, which structural engineer says only explosives could cause the collapses? Oh, that's right. None. Just you. Typical." and after watching the video do you still agree with this?

  • @stuartyy90 Yes, I've seen the video before. Not one of the structural engineers in it - not Dusterwald, not Brookman, not Donly, not Obeid - says only explosives could cause the building collapses. They're calling for a new investigation, but they don't say they've concluded CD.

    Now, are you still running away from your claims about Silverstein's involvement in causing 9/11 and profiting from it? By continuing to ignore this, you're admitting you have nothing. You lose.

  • @PoetryHound its fairly obvious it was caused by explosives though. and my man larry was clearly involved in 9/11. I win. =D

  • @stuartyy90 Ah yes, the unsubstantiated assertion, hallmark of the truthers. Just make whatever claim you want. No need to bother with pesky evidence. LOL!

    Still got no evidence of Silverstein's involvement or profit, I see. Oh, I nearly forgot -- body language. Thanks for the laughs. I'm actually sad that the 9/11 kookspiracy movement is fading. Who will I be able to ridicule? Maybe creationists or alien abduction believers. You guys should all join forces!

  • @stuartyy90 Just because youre too fucking stupid to understand hwat happened isnt proof that it didnt happen.

  • @EdgemanLL2 eh?

  • @stuartyy90 Did I stutter?

  • @EdgemanLL2 well yeah? what does hwat mean?

  • @stuartyy90 Om sorry. Educated people can use context to automatically correct for typo's in their mind, when they read something.

    It means "what."

  • @EdgemanLL2 duuuuuuuuuuuuh faank|S!!!11!! derp...

  • @stuartyy90 Always a pleasure, Corky.

  • @EdgemanLL2

    hwat teh fck izz wong wid dat twoofer

  • @PoetryHound also, have you seen the video where larry explains where he was on 9/11? his body language tells it all, HE IS A LIAR. and it was the way the building fell, it would have been impossible for both of those buildings to fall by just planes hitting them. also, for that building to collapse the way it did, there would have had to have been thousands of explosives throughout the building as everything pretty much just turned into dust which is impossible without explosives. 

  • Jew Scum

  • 0:13 - 0:14 sec does he does he not say " PULL "IT" " He does say ( IT ) not just pull, I played it over and over and over.... can someone please tell me why people don't acknowledge the IT.

  • "pull AND we watched the building collapse" nuff said ! BTW - a 100 yards long building collapsing in free fall, LEVEL with the ground along its ENTIRE length, even DNA matching requires lesser odds!

  • Building 7 is the new Jesus!

  • 911 was an Inside Job and you know it!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • The BBC press released with a (Rothschilds) Reuters script intended for 40 minutes after the collapse of WTC7, but inadvertently released 20 minutes before the "sudden unexpected collapse" of WTC7 for which the "reasons" were also stated and pre-scripted for all collapses that day.

    They press released at London time = Manhattan + 5 hours, instead of +5 + +1 for daylight savings time.

    Therefore the script had been laid out and timed prior to British Summertime =

    Prior to March 2001.

    =Controlled

  • @dontgoback1876 The THREE buildings "collapsed" because they were demolished with explosives.

  • Comment removed

  • @RodneyBeckett

    I find it quite ironic that you claim that nobody is doing anything when, with reference to your previous comments, you have seemingly personally taken it upon yourself to deny and decry the facts of 9/11 for whatever reasons.

    You cannot have it both ways, my friend. You seem to be able to sock-puppet with relative ease.

  • Comment removed

  • ok you are telling me that hours after the WTC attacks a fire started in wtc7 and took some hours to put explosives inside a FIRING Building to pull it...

  • @brunomocsa No. Explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings.

  • @MrGreatdefender i was being ironic...

    thats the point...

  • Occupy Building 7

    November 19 and 20, 2011

    In front of the rebuilt World Trade Center Building 7

    March from Liberty Plaza to WTC 7 @ 12PM each day.

    occupybuilding7 org

    ae911truth org

    patriotsquestion911 com

  • If I'm ever complicit in the murder of 3000 people, first thing I'm gonna do is find a major television network doing a documentary about it and casually admit my compliance.

  • Comment removed

  • @snakeskin2u2 Who would? It doesn't matter anyway, I'd still be getting that sweet insurance money. Speaking of which, has anybody showed this video to the insurance companies who covered the WTC complex? They'd probably be thrilled to hear that Larry pulled his buildings, it would save them billions in payouts!

  • @RodneyBeckett

    The video clearly proves 9/11 was pre-scripted = controlled.

    And NO - it would not save the insurance company billions - the losers would be and are the taxpayers as always.

  • @snakeskin2u2 If it's proof, then we should show it to the insurance companies and nail him for insurance fraud! Surely they will be convinced by this overwhelmingly compelling evidence.

  • @RodneyBeckett

    Scammers do not expose scams.

  • @RodneyBeckett

    Insurance fraud is something of only indirect interest in the matter of 9/11, and as such is mostly irrelevant.

    An insurance company that has sanctioned a fake pay-out is highly unlikely to admit their billions of dollars of fraud. Totally out of the question.

    Wjhat IS of relevance, is that the wtc7 was subjected to timed, pre-scripted demolition. that is proven.

  • @snakeskin2u2 Isn't the end game with 9/11 Truth to bring the real perpetrators to justice? Where are we supposed to start if not here, with this undeniable evidence? You can't tell me that proving Silverstein guilty of 9/11 related insurance fraud, in a US court, would be irrelevant. That could be the catalyst for a whole new investigation. Seems like a waste for this surefire proof to just be sitting here collecting likes and comments rather than actually making a difference in the real world.

  • Comment removed

  • @RodneyBeckett

    Courts of law exist only to protect the elite.

    You must be rather naive if you believe otherwise.

  • @snakeskin2u2 Which arguments did I lose? Whatever, you're just a gatekeeper and an NWO shill. You're encouraging people NOT to take a stand against injustice and instead just sit here commenting on Youtube videos all day so that nothing gets done and nothing changes. "Snakeskin?" Can't believe I didn't figure it out before, you're just a pawn for your reptilian overlords. "Don't do anything, just watch videos, just leave comments..." Sounds like something Dick Cheney would say, LIZARD MAN.

  • @RodneyBeckett

    Any level headed person can see through your smole screen pal.

    Whatever trash you write, it does not alter the fact that 9/11 has been irrefutably proven as a scam involving controlled demolitions for money and power and world dominance.

    You have no arguments to make or offer.

    It is the duty of all American people to take action over this scam before a foreign nation does that for them.

  • @snakeskin2u2 You encouraged us NOT to take action, because you assume the truth of 9/11 will only be met with derision and mockery. The only people who would ASSUME such things are people who have a vested interest in the truth NOT getting out there! Newsflash buddy, Silverstein *wants* us to just sit here watching 9/11 videos all day because it doesn't change a GOD DAMN thing for him! You give him a free pass and rely on the vagueness of "we must take action" with absolutely NO plan in mind.

  • Comment removed

  • @RodneyBeckett

    As I have said, it is the duty of all American people (yes - that includes you, mate) to first put their own house in order before a foreign nation decides to do that for them.

    Or are you asking for us Brits to come and do it for you ?

  • @snakeskin2u2 So what do you suggest we do? You say we can't do it through the courts because that's all a waste of time and there's no need to even try. Tell me how we are supposed to take what we learn from these videos and actually make a difference in how the world works.

  • Comment removed

  • @snakeskin2u2

    The pretty can't seem to hang on to any of their possessions.

    No thanks, you should us you're not very good imperialists.

    Stay on your side of the pond, "mate."

  • Comment removed

  • @bravepercennius

    Well some of you seem to have trouble "pulling it".

    The fact is both sides of the pond are owned by the City of London.

    Did you not know that ?

  • @snakeskin2u2 What a pile of phyco shit you have written. Get a life.

    There should be a large piece of land where conpiracy retards should all live together with a film crue to film their incoherent rantings and demise for entertainment.

    TV needs another decent, reality show.

  • @snakeskin2u2

    Delusional nationalistic fanatic.

  • @RodneyBeckett dude, wake up. any good patriot knows the BEST way to combat the official conspiracy theory and our evil nwo/illuminati/cia/mossad/free­mason overlords is to park yourself in front of your computer and post ad-nauseam on the ever-influential youtube comments section. now please stop gumming up the works.

  • @RodneyBeckett

    This is the most classic ignorant response that complicity illicit's.

  • Can we all chant "Bush's Reichstag fire"? Anybody who claims G.W. Bush's lack of compliance is a total delusional right wing troll trying to save face or trying to generate views on their page for their Google money. Us Americans must always remember: facts, stats, math and science are irrelevant amongst right wing partisanship.

  • @snakeskin2u2 and that all for the oil in the east.....

  • Comment removed

  • @snakeskin2u2 Yes, also that....

  • @tesseract666

    @tesseract666

    I'm glad that you are so aware of the state the world is in at the moment. Good on you for researching.

    If you wish to know more, then search what Beatrix is involved in at the moment and also her father's activities in WW2 and at the end of the war to understand where we are presently at. She is the one who holds the banking elite together, and without whom they would soon perhaps slaughter each other.

    Also any vids by aodscarecrow are excellent my friend.

  • Do a google search and you will find pictures of demolition crews using cables to pull down building 7. "Pull it" as an demolition phrase specifically means to pull something down with cables or to pull one building away from another.

  • @jvidell

    Buildings cannot be "pulled" with cables. Total lies.

    Total lies and mis-info - the controlled demolition by explosives is proven.

    WTC7 - as both the twin towers, has been irrefutably proven as a controlled demolition.

    You can try and re-write the truth to make it impossible, but you cannot fault the evidence of liive video.

    You cannot argue with that.

  • @snakeskin2u2 "Buildings cannot be "pulled" with cables. Total lies."

    Um, Snake? That's EXACTLY what they did to building 6: watch?v=1uxlrcQL5Dk

  • Comment removed

  • It is not necessary to have expertise in any particular field, -nor to have letters after you name-, in order that you may conclude that 9/11 was just a scam.

    Purely simple deduction proves that fact in more areas than one.

    Not a single shred of evidence can prove otherwise.

    The fact that it was a scam has been available in video here on you tube for the past ten years.

    Please either wise up or leave.

    If you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem !

  • @snakeskin2u2

    You believe in the evil "new world order", whatever the fuck that is.

    WHY HAVE THEY ALLOWED DA TWOOF TO COME OUT ON YOUTUBE?!?

    D'oh!

  • Comment removed

  • 100 metres long WTC7, fell at the same time at each end, leaving the entire building in freefall?? Even DNA evidence has lesser odds? Or is the video faked?

  • yeah ok

  • @MrW454ci Dont be a total pussy your whole life. Have the balls to hit "reply."

    Unless you enjoy being a ball-less pussy and never want to change. =]

  • @EdgemanLL2 you're a fucktard. eat dick, you pussy bitch.

  • @MrW454ci Awe. Im sorry I hurt your vagina.

    But its cute that you have all those sexual fantasies about me. I'm not here to judge. =]

  • Lol, to say fire is the cause of wtc7, is like saying fire is not hot! There is no way a steel frame building fall free fall speed into it's footprint, due to fire! When Larry said pull it, he really meant pull the fucker down so I can get my money! 9/11 was a inside job!

  • @Thebirdgang20 .. And because you hate rich Jews who was also 'in on it'?

  • I think this guy is a reptilian shape-shifter!

  • You know if you look at his mouth.. He looks to be saying "Pull em" as in Pull them meaning pull the fire-fighters out.

  • This is 100% evidence that 9/11 was fake,it takes weeks to plan out were bombs are suppose to be planted for a building to fall perfectly down like wtc7

  • On 11th September 2001, London was one hour ahead of GMT.

    (Thanks to edgeman for pointing this out) i.e. One hour ahead of standard time.

    The transmission was 20 minutes prior to the "collapse" , and stating that the event had happened some short time ago. = @ 1 hour error.

  • @snakaeda <---Backs off his original claim that London was 1 hour ahead of NYC that day, and changes the claim to something else.

    And, Snakeada KNOWS she lies, which is why she didnt hit "reply" to the original reply. =]

    Lastly, the final nail in the moronic coffin is that the BBC broadcaster (and station) that DID the story WERE IN NEW YORK. So there WAS NO time change for them.

    Kooks are stupid.