Added: 1 year ago
From: 1967PmdGto
Views: 525
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Awesome!

  • 280hp!!!!

  • Yeah his 280 statement really under rate's this car for 2 reasons. 1. It translates to around the high 300s at the flywheel, or a little better than the stock ratings in the mid 300s (also at the flywheel). 2. And matched against most of todays smaller engines rated at the same hp in an identical weight car, these larger engines are usually 'quicker' because their torque was well in the 400s. Whereas it's common for a 4 banger to produce only the same or less torque than their hp rating.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more