Added: 2 years ago
From: Hexameron
Views: 50,136
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (108)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The thing to remember with this piece, i honestly don't think the middle section is supposed to be romantic in the true sense, alkan was a recluse, a mysogynist, a misanthropist... perhaps he felt that nobody did love him, and the stunning scales and sheer drama of the piece were whis version of a cry out for someone to love him? the title of the piece is 'Love me' and when you think of someone saying that, it's different from 'I love you'. There is so much pent up emotion in this piece.

  • Quién es el pianista?

  • Who's the pianist?

  • On par with Liszt's piano solos...if not better

  • I put Alkan at the same level as Liszt and Chopin. In fact, Liszt once remarked that Alkan had the best pianistic technique he'd ever seen.

  • I'm in love!

  • 4:36

    :O

  • 8:55

  • why a-flat minor? it's nearly impossible to play ;-)

  • @domeyer You answered to your own question.

  • Interesting how Alkan seems to return the theme of tragic unrequited love in the "Chant d'Amour - Chant de Mort". I guess you could say that he was trying to refine and condense his ideas expressed in the "Trois Morceaux" when writing it.

    @domeyer What? It's only the relative minor of C-flat Major! :P

  • Alcan is a perfect composer to me, no boredom, no reason to stop listening. But Ravel is my favourite one.

  • This is so beautiful and rich!

  • Charles-Valentin Alkan deserves much more recognition as a solo piano composer and an artist. For his time he really had a lot of ingenuity. I think he was ahead of a his time a bit. Just look at the notation. People still really have not done some of the things the way he did. It is fascinating to watch the notation of this music while listening.

  • A great composer indeed.

  • no dislikes...that's what I like to see

  • @hexameron Like your video, grat song... would love to learn it.. where can i find the script(prntable)? could you tell me please

  • This music is so beautiful, Alkan the great Jewish composer was a genius!

  • wow 7 flats O_O

  • @IlCOLElI Why? is that prohibited? 

  • Great stuff, thx for the upload.

  • Man, just imagine how much money Hamelin would earn if he were to be paid per notes that he played in his lifetime. Even if it were a penny, he would still be rich.

  • the transition from 5:28 to 5:50 is brilliant

  • absolutely amazing

  • I'm so happy that there is no "I dislike"!

  • aime moi sil vous plait!

  • C'est beau, élégiaque et tendre

  • Comment removed

  • Only video I've seen with 0 dislikes.

    For good reason.

  • Bit unorthodox to use Cb Maj/Ab Min than the usual enharmonic equiv. But that's Alkan for ya.

  • Does anyone know whether or not he was related to Siegfried Alkan (a jewish german composer)?

  • @churchlandsmuso4life It doesn't seem so. Alkan was actually his fathers name. Plus, he was french.

  • I'm tired of this nonsense about Alkan being underrated. He is, if anything, overrated by now. This piece for example is nothing but a Lied ohne Worter dressed up in ridiculous pianistic figurations that Mendelssohn wouldn't have bothered wasting time with.

    All of Alkan's music sounds like Mendelssohn with whom he was apparently obsessed. I'd rather listen to one 2 minute Mendelssohn piece than this overwritten shit. There's about the same amount of musical thought involved.

  • @brandonkerry1 Wow, how constructive of a criticism.  What are they teaching in schools?

  • @thegreatapologist I don't know, what are they teaching an effeminate young teenager like you in school? If you read the description of the piece, Ronald Smith says what needs to be said about it, even if he is being much nicer than he needs to be. And I don't know how I can offer "constructive criticism" to a man who has been dead since 1888, but if you know, please do tell. Maybe you don't know what constructive criticism is. What are they teaching in schools?

  • @AndrewFinch1 First of all, I'm not effeminate. You know nothing about whether I actually am or not, so why call me that? Secondly, what I was saying was that your comment can be boiled down to "Its dumb and to virtuosic." Neither of which are constructive and are therefore useless and insulting. Sure, the guys been dead, but there are composers today who would love to know what's good and what isn't in a piece. Constructive criticism is with an intent of helping, not being insulting.

  • @thegreatapologist Your videos reveal you to be effeminate. Look at the beginning of the piece, and then look at a Mendelssohn LoW. Then imagine Mendelssohn dressing it up and making it last 7 minutes too long. Extrapolate something. If that is how you boil down my comment, than that says something about you, not mee. And I would never say "to (sic) virtuosic". I said overwritten, and it is, both pianistically and thematically.

  • @AndrewFinch1 Which videos are you referring to?

    This music says says a lot of things. If it was just three minutes, everything would be jammed. And as for saying "something about you, not something about mee (sic)" that's what I took "ridiculous pianistic figurations" to mean.

    If you think it's overwritten, then fine. Listen to whatever music you like. Meanwhile, I'll listen to music that's more developed then the time normally devoted to pop music.

  • @thegreatapologist What development? This is like a pastiche that goes on and on. I'm sorry, I don't equate length to development. A 12 bar Mozart development has more invention than Alkan's typical development, which usually consists of playing the same thing over and over in different keys or changing figurations. There is a reason Alkan isn't regarded as a great composer, and this piece is the epitome of why.

  • @AndrewFinch1 Umm, no. Just no. I have no idea where you are getting that from, but it's simply false.

    And besides, this is not a sonata, but a free form programmatic piece. It's not intended to have the development of a sonata, but of a programmatic piece.

  • @thegreatapologist The reason this is 9 minutes long is fairly obvious. It is a failed attempt by Alkan to copy the structure of a ballade or fantasy by Chopin without having any of the necessary skill at manipulating themes or knowing how to tie disparate material together. This piece is a combination of Mendelssohnian themes mated to a Chopinian structure and padded with unimaginative but difficult to play pianistic forms. It is derivative, it is boring, it is typical Alkan.

  • @AndrewFinch1 Chopin's first Ballade was written one year earlier. As for Mendelssohn, Mendelssohn was in germany while Alkan was holed up in his parisian apartment, seen no one and listening to no music. Anything that sounds like Mendelssohn is merely coincidental. And finally, this piece is not typical Alkan at all. Try his concerto for solo piano on for size, or his sonatina. Those are not derivative. They sound contemporary, but they were written in the mid 1800s.

  • @thegreatapologist You have got to be shitting me, your ignorance of 19th century music is unbelievable. If you think Alkan was some kind of musical hermit at this point, you're incredibly foolish. And EVERYONE would have known Mendelssohn's music, especially a composer in Paris. Why don't you start with simple biographies of Mendelssohn, Chopin, Liszt, etc., than get back to me when you're out of your musical diapers. The nonsense about sonata development has nothing to do with my writing.

  • @thegreatapologist Hey, dipshit, go Google Mendelssohn and Alkan, and you'll see just how much Alkan of Mendelssohn's music Alkan studied and played. Amazing that somehow other peoples' music could get through the force field that surrounded Alkan's apartment. And as anyone knows, Chopin was playing the Ballade all over Paris for at least a couple of years before it was published. Anyone except for you, that is.

    MORON

  • @AndrewFinch1 Hmm. Ad Hominem. Now, you resort to acting like a five year old. Congradulations.

    I no longer care about your opinion. Your insults have eliminated any worth in it. Go on and insult someone else. Since you can't seem able to say anything useful to anyone, I will simply repeat what a little rabbit told me when I was little:

    If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.

  • @thegreatapologist I'll say the same thing that I say to every 15 year old that gets burned by me, and then tries to use logic terms. It doesn't matter if I say that 1+1 = 2, or I say 1+1 = 2, you asshole. The ad hominem doesn't negate the entire argument.

    You'll have to go and look up what an ad hominem ARGUMENT is, and what an insult is.

  • @AndrewFinch1 I agree that I lost the argument that Mendelssohn influenced Alkan. I admit that I didn't check the facts in regards to his influence.

    However, in regards to your actual opinion as to Alkan's musical quality, I no longer care about it. That's what I was saying in my reply.

  • ive never seen so many flats in my life

  • ive only just heard of this composer.....and blimey I have been missing something beautiful.thank you hexameron!the sheet music helps me appreciate just how difficult this music is

  • the biggining of this pice is so beutiful. but i think its a bit boring after a while :-l

  • Comment removed

  • re-spect... for Hamelin... I can tell why no other pianists whould consider playing this piece.. it is so insanely difficult! yet beautiful. Who cares he isn't as famous as Chopin or Schumann... only the more left for us admirers : )

  • In the end, in spite of all this mystery, one thing is certain: Aime-Moi is a truly wonderful piece of work... Its deep emotional content, romantic inflection, and superb academic interest are all fused together to show that yet again, Alkan was more than just a second-rate composer. Don't believe me? Just ask Mr. Liszt, to whom the Trois Morceaux were dedicated to.

    [End rant]

    So, how did I do, guys? Would Ronald Smith be proud of my insights? I tried analyzing this work like Smith would.

  • Comment removed

  • @OrangeSodaKing Such troll. lol...

  • And our character seems to be pondering many things, including, but not limited to, his love and anxiety over this love. The greatest mystery is about the ending. What happened? Did the woman end up loving him? Did he get over his anxiety, or just put it to rest for a short while? Did he put it to rest at all? Is the program behind this piece concrete (as in, is it actually about his relations with her), or was it abstract (as in, just a journey inside his thoughts and emotions)?

  • And this intensification is represented by the progression in division of the beats (groups of 3, groups of 4, 5, 6, 7, and finally to 8). The musical, emotional, and academic climax falls back into a recapitulation of the beginning, but a new sudden anxiety takes place, because it goes straight from 8th notes to triplet 16th notes and use of octaves and leaps in the melody to emphasize emotional strain. Relaxing a little, the sixteenth notes return to regular duple (groups of 4) to be continued

  • And finally, at 4:36, groups of 8, where the piece climaxes. The significance seems like at the beginning, someone Alkan may be portraying, either concretely or just abstractly (or maybe even himself... He was single at this time), is either wishing for love or singing a love song to someone (I speculate the former, because the mood is too dark to be seductive, flattering, or to a proper woman's taste to be sung to her). His anxiety from this love or desire to be loved keeps intensifying (t.b.c)

  • I keep coming back and commenting on this video, but I've noticed something amazing! Not only is this piece romantically and musically satisfying, but it is also academically very interesting. There may be more program to this work than just the title "Love Me." If you notice at the beginning, Alkan is centering around 8th notes. At 1:29, it turns into triplets (groups of 3). At 2:15, 16th notes (groups of 4). At 3:10, groups of 5. 3:30, groups of 6. 4:12, groups of 7, (to be continued)

  • Je découvre Alkan et je dois dire que je suis complètement émerveillée, quelle magie!

  • you can post aime-moi la bemol mineur? or is the same song?

  • 3:30 - 4:11 my fav part

  • 4:36-5:09 is my favorite part of this piece! :D

    6:07 sounds like something from Rachmaninoff (who was about 70 or so years later)

  • Those Baroque trills around 1:07 are wonderful!

  • What happened to AdiOsi's (I think AdiOsi was his name) channel? He performed all three Trois Morceaux and had them on Youtube, and now his channel is gone. Disappeared. I should have downloaded the videos. ADIOSI PLEASE COME BACK!

    I've always found it interesting that these are some of his best works, and they're early works; before the death of Chopin, before his unfair defeat for professorship at the Paris Conservatoire to Marmontel, and even before the birth of his illegitimate son.

  • "Love me"...hmm what a title

  • Hmm, I see what you mean... It sounds like a man losing his pride after rejection, but then somehow tries to recover... Alkan was, afterall, a very reclusive genius.

  • This is a very simple work, but at the same time, apt, effective, and picturesque. In this piece, he takes technical and melodic ideas that seem cliched, and he explores their merits.

  • the ending is haunting. beautifully played and, of course, composed. alkan is the freest spirit in music.

  • 04:56 i can hear the thunder storm

  • hmm..this one does sound kinda Chopin-y

  • Or Chopin sounds kinda this ;P

  • Yes is does.  Chopin and Alkan had great influence on eachother

  • 1:30-1:34 Simpsons theme

  • I guess its not in the correct pitch but it sounds like right !!looool

  • no, the pitch is ok

  • I think he was comparing this to the simpsons theme :P

  • lmao

  • @Und1ne Sorry but not Simpsons theme starts with tritonus (diminished fitfht interval ) and this is not the case.

  • @MikeTsubasa Thanks mr exacto

  • @Und1ne it would have been odd if it were....but it's not...it's only the first 3 notes of it, the higher notes are lower than in the actual theme!

  • what key is that Cb? or Ab minor, even? I've never seen so many flats in the key signature xD

  • Ab Minor - It's weird how the 7th flat is on the top of the staff, I've never seen it written like that

  • alkan was a weirdo lol

  • This might be the publisher's doing; not Alkan's. Either way does it matter? Yes, beginning music theory students would get a point taken off for writing the key signature that way, but an Fb is an Fb.

  • @Hexameron Key signatures were written differently back in those days, so Alkan and the publisher were both correct ;)

  • @Hexameron yes correct, there would be no other way to write it unless you wrote its enharmonics which would be Dx or E. By the way, lovely video. Alkan is by far my favorite composer. I'm also a Chopin and Gershwin fan.

  • @celach No weirdos here only limited people who can't get that

  • All Time Masterpiece!!! Bravo!

  • Hmmm...Alkan's style is pretty unique, he's relatively new to me. Thanks for sharing.

  • I love how Hamelin puts some rubato in this :D

  • Comment removed

  • Thanks for uploading this! Your contributions to the society of music is well appreciated.

  • Same quality of a Chopin ballade

  • I think this was highly influenced by Chopin. This is definitely not written in the usual Alkan style.

  • I wish more people would bother with these pieces.

    It's a pity that out of all the fantastic pianists and musicians out there, Marc-André Hamelin is the only one who has recorded these works or included them in his repertoire in their entirety. It's strange, considering these are three of the only pieces Alkan composed that expressly allow for personal artistic license!

    I am however glad to see that young Etsuko Hirose has successfuly championed (and recorded) Le Vent, no. 2 of the set.

  • I absolutely agree. The neglect of these pieces is ridiculous and despite the absence of performance directions, Hamelin exhibits amazing interpretative clairvoyance in each one.

    There are a few other recordings of Op. 15; one CD called "Alkan in 1837" features Op. 12-17, but the performances are rather poor.

  • In general: I think Alkan is the most neglected romantical piano composer. His pieces show virtuosity but also a very clever composer who treats the melodic passages very delicate

  • I haven't heard the Nanasakov or Robert Rivard recordings - are they still available? I would like to listen to them to see how they compare. Someone should also try to post other neglected pieces by Alkan, especially pieces like 'Bourée d'Auvergne', 'Quasi Caccia', 'Le Grillon' etc - these would be fascinating to hear in recorded performances.

    Thanks.

  • The Nanasakov is not an actual performance - it's a midi played through a modified piano.

  • @Hexameron

    I prefer Michael Nansakov's performance of this piece. It's far more lyrical, more tonal shading, far more drama!

  • @Hexameron

    I prefer Michael Nansakov's performance of this piece. It's far more lyrical, more tonal shading, far more drama!

  • @AndyWarhol but thats not a recording of a performance, its a digital one. not a human

  • @Hexameron I think Alkan's obscurity as a composer is partially a result of poor luck. I don't think great pianists intentionally neglected Alkan's works in the past, they probably just were preoccupied with bringing other great composers out of obscurity (like Horowitz and Scriabin.)

  • @Hexameron i guess that's exactly why Alkan's referred to as the "forgotten genius", all the hard work put into these pieces and it feels like barely anyone knows him...

  • @4candles I think the somewhat sobering truth is that these pieces are just ridiculously difficult to pull off. At the end of the day, most pianists who put in many hours get very mediocre results with Alkan. It's not worth it to the seasoned professional. And of course, when an amateur attempts it, it rarely receives the affection it should. He's just a tough guy to give justice to and, IMO, mastering an Alkan piece is like juicing an Iron Orange. The effort to juice ration is a little off.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more