If we were on mars instead of earth. Your calculation for the speed of light would not be the same as it here. A mars light year is different than an earth light year. 365 days is determined by the amount of sunrises until the cycle observed in sky from your position starts over. It's got nothing to do with distance traveled. In fact, try and prove we moved at all in that time and you can't.
You can't see the beam of a laser if there is no gas, liquid or solid in the path of the laser. If you were to try and prove that light is still "traveling" in the path of the laser without a mass you couldn't. So prove to me anything is moving in the path of laser without a mass. You can't.....
Light is only observed when mass is involved. You can only observe the light that is coming off the mass. If you can't observe or prove there is any light in between the scource and a mass other than the light coming off the mass you have no proof light travels.
@sadathusain I wrote a simple 2D gravitational simulation in C using the linux X library and Newton's law of universal gravitation. I added in some set objects that I can load into the simulation simply by pressing a key on the keyboard, i.e. the solar system in that video. I also made it so I could select from various detail views to show mass, acceleration, velocity, etc.
" Relativity Theory seems pretty surpassed now " Ask the folks of Hiroshima and Nagasaki how surpassed it is...Bowden is completely wrong---see the vid!
Mariobros2 watch it again and actually listen. Also a detailed video (like this one) would be of value rather than your totally unexplained, unsubstantiated, border line utterly incoherent (at least first 2) paragraphs. "Relativity Theory seems pretty surpassed now..." *chuckle* Make a video and explain.
Coriolis force becomes a real force now???? Since, for the science establishment, Coriolis force produces cyclones with that characteristic spiral shaped clouds is it a pure chance that galaxies present quite a similar shape???? Moreover your beloved Relativity Theory seems pretty surpassed now as it's possible to go much faster than light and, in addition, light's speed hasn't absolutely been always the same. Collecting facts is necessary but it does't cancel the need of interpreting them.
@Mariobros2 Relativity does not only explain the speed of light. It explains how physical measures may change relative to your frame of reference. Light speed is always the same. It is a physical law and it has never changed. If you are talking about the fact that light travels at different speeds through different media, that is different. Everything travels at different speeds through different media.
@Mariobros2 You know how to travel faster than light? COOL, share your Knowledge. Coriolis-Force IS real, even my friend in the Military has to deal with it. Also, the observation that light travells slower through some mediums is due to the fact that the light is, in the medium, reflected by particles, and goes zig-zag...if you drive 100 miles with 100mph you need an hour. if yo cover a distance of 100miles driving at 100mph and the road is actually 200miles long zig-zag, you need 2 hours.
of a non-moving earth. This is a fact... it's history. Moreover there have been a lot of observated facts which could quite realistically lead to this direction. Just consider the CMB dipole or the uniform distributed Gamma Ray Bursts or many other things too. Thirring in the '40s proved that a fast rotating hollow sphere cause a field of centrifugal forces inside it... why not to think that the fixed stars rotate around us this same way causing centrifugal forces so that the famous
I'd suggest the author of this video to read "Galileo was wrong the church was right" by Bennett and Sungenis... He's speaking without having the whole picture of the problem. The geocentrists have never said that Michelson concluded a fixed earth from the experiments (infact he was a Copernican). The fixed earth possibility is advanced by geocentrists themselves after collecting a lot of information from past scientists. Clearly most of them were trying to escape from the possibility
If we were on mars instead of earth. Your calculation for the speed of light would not be the same as it here. A mars light year is different than an earth light year. 365 days is determined by the amount of sunrises until the cycle observed in sky from your position starts over. It's got nothing to do with distance traveled. In fact, try and prove we moved at all in that time and you can't.
bridgetroll9 3 months ago
You can't see the beam of a laser if there is no gas, liquid or solid in the path of the laser. If you were to try and prove that light is still "traveling" in the path of the laser without a mass you couldn't. So prove to me anything is moving in the path of laser without a mass. You can't.....
bridgetroll9 3 months ago
Light is only observed when mass is involved. You can only observe the light that is coming off the mass. If you can't observe or prove there is any light in between the scource and a mass other than the light coming off the mass you have no proof light travels.
bridgetroll9 3 months ago
fucking monkey assholes,go to your cave and stop posting this kind of bullshit
TheHotelMoxa 8 months ago
hey how'd you get the simulation at 9:06?
sadathusain 10 months ago
@sadathusain I wrote a simple 2D gravitational simulation in C using the linux X library and Newton's law of universal gravitation. I added in some set objects that I can load into the simulation simply by pressing a key on the keyboard, i.e. the solar system in that video. I also made it so I could select from various detail views to show mass, acceleration, velocity, etc.
chaogenus 10 months ago
They pick and choose, it's a lie because they readily leave out the truth of all the experiments they mention.
I was gonna go over this, now I feel I don't need to =]
Samuelwhatshisface 1 year ago
" Relativity Theory seems pretty surpassed now " Ask the folks of Hiroshima and Nagasaki how surpassed it is...Bowden is completely wrong---see the vid!
pontecanis 1 year ago
5 star
Mariobros2 watch it again and actually listen. Also a detailed video (like this one) would be of value rather than your totally unexplained, unsubstantiated, border line utterly incoherent (at least first 2) paragraphs. "Relativity Theory seems pretty surpassed now..." *chuckle* Make a video and explain.
HIB0x7B3 1 year ago
Coriolis force becomes a real force now???? Since, for the science establishment, Coriolis force produces cyclones with that characteristic spiral shaped clouds is it a pure chance that galaxies present quite a similar shape???? Moreover your beloved Relativity Theory seems pretty surpassed now as it's possible to go much faster than light and, in addition, light's speed hasn't absolutely been always the same. Collecting facts is necessary but it does't cancel the need of interpreting them.
Mariobros2 1 year ago
@Mariobros2 Relativity does not only explain the speed of light. It explains how physical measures may change relative to your frame of reference. Light speed is always the same. It is a physical law and it has never changed. If you are talking about the fact that light travels at different speeds through different media, that is different. Everything travels at different speeds through different media.
a14jvx 1 year ago
@a14jvx what about takeons? dunno if i spelled that right.
GlassHalfEmpty23 1 year ago
@Mariobros2 You know how to travel faster than light? COOL, share your Knowledge. Coriolis-Force IS real, even my friend in the Military has to deal with it. Also, the observation that light travells slower through some mediums is due to the fact that the light is, in the medium, reflected by particles, and goes zig-zag...if you drive 100 miles with 100mph you need an hour. if yo cover a distance of 100miles driving at 100mph and the road is actually 200miles long zig-zag, you need 2 hours.
LutzDerLurch 1 year ago
of a non-moving earth. This is a fact... it's history. Moreover there have been a lot of observated facts which could quite realistically lead to this direction. Just consider the CMB dipole or the uniform distributed Gamma Ray Bursts or many other things too. Thirring in the '40s proved that a fast rotating hollow sphere cause a field of centrifugal forces inside it... why not to think that the fixed stars rotate around us this same way causing centrifugal forces so that the famous
Mariobros2 1 year ago
I'd suggest the author of this video to read "Galileo was wrong the church was right" by Bennett and Sungenis... He's speaking without having the whole picture of the problem. The geocentrists have never said that Michelson concluded a fixed earth from the experiments (infact he was a Copernican). The fixed earth possibility is advanced by geocentrists themselves after collecting a lot of information from past scientists. Clearly most of them were trying to escape from the possibility
Mariobros2 1 year ago
5star
ZalaBirdGod 2 years ago