Added: 3 years ago
From: waccamawn
Views: 6,061
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • A comet flattened North America in 11,000 BC, eradicaing all wildlfe and the Aborigines of North America. The wildlife of the time was blasted all over the place, sometimes involving diverse ranges of animal species clustered together. So, the tar pits of North America were not pits of tar that Stone-Age animals periodically fell iunto and got trapped, because the tar is in fact oil in the process of formation from the compacting of the bodies of dead animals.

  • ###PHISHING FRAUD ALERT###

    ~doctoRnmics is a fraudulent criminal imposter site & is affiliated with WizardWithin & ALoENoMESell

    =public sworn to vanalize docatoMics channel, product & aquaintences

    -YouTube has failed to act in due diligence against this crime

  • ...comet or energize Local Interstellar gas Cloud from the same super nova that bore this solar system

    ~well I will tell you that we may know , as we are well into a new spiral arm of that which was that last arm, 13,000 years ago.

    =so is there junks bigger than the raindrops that gave us the extra water during the deluges or great floods of that past which are not possible by 26,000 year great year of procession; I can tell you that much for certain !

  • why, at the beginning, does he say the damaged bones date back to 34ka when the YD was 12.9-11.7ka? error

  • What was the name of the original documentary?

  • the "younger dryas impact" sounds like a load of crap to me. so it selectively killed off large animal species but left other large animal species untouched?

    and theres no crater becuase its stuck a glacier, but also no evidence of the kind of gigantoid flooding that would have caused.hmmmmmm sure send them a few million in grant money! what the hell!

  • @solerso68; Why does this impact theory sound like such a reach to you? The Tunguska strike at the beginning of the last century left no appreciable crater but devastated an area the size of Rhode Island. Barely a month goes by when we don't have some new footage of meteors and fireballs on the news. We are 6.8 billion people depeending on a very few kinds of crops to survive. It wouldn't take very much to tip us into chaos.

  • I think its a fad, thats why. An real modern, scientific fad, to blame every shift in climate ,local or global extinction event on a "massive impact". The entire impact "theory" is based on a strata of alleged nano diamonds, and yet nearly every GEOLOGICAL authority ive referenced refuses to characterize them as "extraterrestrial nano diamonds" . they most likely were deposited by volcanic activity. HUMANS killed off the NA mega fauna. and no bolt from the blue is going to change that.

  • @solerso68: I can see why you may think that except for two points, human population density was very low (less than 2 persons per sq mile), and as we've learned from the Permian and KT exinctions, that they occur after multiple insults to the ecological system. We may have been a contributing factor, but I feel very certain, based on the evidence, we weren't the only actor in this. But there is still much data to be considered.

  • yes but we are talking about relative populations here, the mamoth poulation was much less the 2 per sq mile, and the large predator populatyion was even smaller than that. we know from french fur trappers of the 17th century that neolithic plains tribes they encountered, had mass killing methods, such as "jumps" were they harvested entire herds.

    this has been verified by remains evidence. why would an impact only kill off some people and not the rest, and not antelope, bear, bison, etc ?

  • @solerso68: These are all very good questions. But there are factors you might be missing. These jumps occurred after the first european plagues swep thru the region, therby reducing hunting pressure on large game populations. Additionally, there are very few megafauna kill sites found. Kimmiswick (near my wife's hometown) is one. And several more reasons. But since we are so limited in space, so : watch?v=g2uvhX3D7YI And please go thru the entire series. Like I said, the jury is still out.

  • but the hunting method did not pop up and spread in a generation. So which is it? there were too many mamoth to kill off, or not enough to kill off quickly enough? all of the impact premises are as if to say well you cant rule out our theory empircally no. and i cant rule out god, or greys empircaly either, and they are articles of faith also. it proves my point. the only real reason for this theory to exist is for grant money and to get published. are we really that out of ideas?

  • @solerso68: Or could it be that we, ourselves might also be in the firing line, so answering questions liek this becomes paramount. I'm not married to this particula hypothesis, I just haven't found anything that makes a better fit with the data we have. With 50 kyo Berringer Crater in hand, is it not possible that another strike migth have occurred when populations were already stressed? It's something to think about. Please drop me an IM with your thoughts. I've got to get some sleep.

  • We may be "in the firing line". we almost vertainly are, statistaclly. but lets not invent history to point that out. the fact that we as a species are using up our rescources, and we have done that before, should be just as alarming to most people.

  • also magick, there would be no evidence of mass kills becasue there was no surplus. the whole human mamoth hunting enterpise in NA is a short one, which is the whole point. Humans did not go exticnt in NA, a specific human CULTURE did. the large predators went extinct when there food was gone. one day someone will say, what happened to all the people in detroit? look for evidence of an impact.

  • @solerso68: LOL, I've lived in Detroit! That's a bit too close to home to be really funny. Nah, Detroit will collapse into an old salt mine and be swallowed up. I've really gotta crash. This has been very interesting, conversing with you over this. Best to you , and please take a look at the link I've sent. I'll check out anything you send in return.

  • ok?? a shotgun wont even dent a mammoth tusk yet our stone age brothers used to hunt them??

    stupid or staunch i dunno...

  • yes our "stone age brothers" hunted them to extinction. I assume our stone age brothers hunting methods didnt involve attacking the tusks.

  • but they didint attack their tusks they attacked their bodies ,which are much softer, what they were try to get across was that the tusks could not be penatrated with a shot gun from today but SOMETHING from the past disintegrated them.......

  • I'm surprised they didn't mention the high concentrations of iridium found in the black layer from 13,000 years ago, also indicating an asteroid impact. A similar layer, also high in iridium, from 65,000,000 years ago is now the most widely accepted cause for the extinction of the dinosaurs.

  • Pretty cool! Is there speculation as to whether it was a "rogue" asteroid, or part of a "flock"? Can we trace the orbit of the "flock" and figure a chance of future impact? I'm an astro noob.

  • Any time now, somebody's going to come here and say this can't be true, because the world ain't that old. Must have been confusing for those Stone Age people to know they didn't really exist!

  • There are many locations stuff has been found. You can see it on Ebay: "mammoth-killer meteorite"

  • Has anyone found the location of the asteroid impact?

  • mabey a bit late but check out the strategically shaped gulf of mexico...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more