Added: 3 years ago
From: damoosebelly
Views: 20,427
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (55)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • GOD BLESS THE USA!!!.

  • bbweerroowww bbweerroowww bbweerroowww

  • I don't like yellow nations till today.

  • That more senior looking intructor is Chuck Norris' grandpappy.

  • Thank goodness for codebreakers!

  • Matsuo Fuchida (around 4:00 mark) was the same pilot who led the attack on Pearl Harbor. Sometime after the war he converted to Christianity and became a minister.

  • @AllanR2D2 He also became an American citizen...how's that for irony?

  • yes they declared war because of poland because they had alliances with that country.

  • "what would they have done against the entire german army who were more expierenced with more sophisticated weapons"

    Umm. Once upon a time, there was this little thing called the atomic bomb...

  • japans leaders lied 2 there country saying midway was triumphant . in actual fact they lost all . and soon after america entered and demolished japan ..

  • Should have went after the Japanese first. That was where OUR WAR was. Would have been better to attack Hitler only after he took out Stalin.

    Stalin made a separate peace with the Empire before they attacked Pearl Harbor. Stalin should never been part of the peace treaty with Japan. Korea would have never happened, nor Vietnam.

  • i apologize if i am responding a month too late

    i agree completely

    hitler killed 10 million

    stalin killed 25 milion

  • no they both killed the same amount of people. hitler killed cause he was racist. stalin kill cause he wanted to show fear

  • @lifes40123

    i agree with you about the intentions

    but they didn't killed the same amount?

    stalin killed 23 million (just in the 30s, they estimate he killed 40 mil all together)

    and hitler killed 11 million from 33-45

    this could be because stalin ruled over a larger population but still

    you are incorrect

    stalin killed more

    but even both COMBINED didn't kill as many as Mao when he starved the chinese countryside on purpose

  • no hitler killed more people. he created ww2 which killed 70 million people haha. japs had nothin to do with this.

  • ww2 killed 55 million and 20 million were in the asian theater

    so 35 million died in europe, and hitler wasn't responsible for the allied bombing raids which killed 10 million or so. as a matter of fact, if uk and france didn't declare war, then there wouldn't have been war.

    and both HITLER AND STALIN invaded eastern europe in 1939 but you only blame hitler for starting the war. actually stalin invaded 6 countries in 1939 germany only invaded poland

    you're a simple fool

  • uk and france declared war on germany because germany invaded poland

    but russia invaded poland, finland, latvia, lithuania, hungary, romania, turkey, and iran. uk and france did NOT declare war on russia

    you can't say hitler started ww2, some people say japan started the war by invading china in 1937

    you are such a simple little child

    the world is not black and white, kiddo

  • @7StoryMagnet You are a twat, and no matter how many "thumbs up" you give yourself from your multiple accounts, everybody knows it. Oh, for a time machine, to send the unemployed neo-nazi wankers back to the years they dream of.... so they can be euthanised with the rest of the mentally ill.

  • @TheBelovedButterfly are you actually replying to a comment posted 4 months ago? And why are you ranting about neo-nazis? Therapy....just a suggestion, kid.

  • @7StoryMagnet Well, it hasn't worked for you! Here on plantet Earth, we can't reply to comments until we had read them: in this case, yesterday. Your comment was nazi-apologist (WW2 wasn't Hitler's fault, etc) like all the other neo-Nazi loons on YT who use this forum because it is cheaper than presription drugs. If, since claiming that Hitler didn't start WW2, you've had treatment and revised that insane opinion, then say so and I will gladly withdraw the accusation that you are a neo-Nazi.

  • @TheBelovedButterfly No, you replied to a comment I made 4 months ago, probably because you have no life. And I don't really give a shit what you call me...a nazi...a commie...a satanist. I don't really give a shit because only desperate morons who hate when people disagree with them sink that low.

    Not that I would care anyway seeing as how you hate black people

    don't you have a klan rally to go to or something, racist asshole?

  • @7StoryMagnet I'd say that bothering to rant or even question why someone has replied, then spamming someone's channel is proof positive of having no life; and by the way, being (as you called me) a "racist anti-nazi" is something of an oxymoron. I'm British but live in France, and in neither place are there Klan meetings, although if you are interested, I daresay you will find one in Dungsville, Arkansas or whichever cess-pit has the misfortune to house you.

  • @TheBelovedButterfly I lived in England for 2 years and trust me, there were plenty of racists like you out there. They mostly hated Arabs and Hindus.....which I guess explains why you keep calling people Nazis. Just because you're pro-Israel, doesn't mean you have to be an Islamophobic racist twat.

    And by the way, leaving one single message to someone who called you a nazi for no reason, that's not called spamming, kiddo. Stupid racist.

  • @7StoryMagnet Hated Arabs and Hindus? what a load of bollocks. As for living in England, you probably don't even have a passport! You are Nazi apologist because you claimed Hitler didn't begin WW2; there are a lot of freaks like you in YT land. I am very well educated, thanks - with an Honours degree specialising in European war 1900 - 1950. Did you share a class with Sarah Palin, that great intellectual luminary of the Republican party?

  • @TheBelovedButterfly i'm a nazi apologist for saying that ww2 began in 1937 for asians, 1939 for europeans, and 1941 for americans? uh....kiddo seriously...seriously... you need help. It's like you're missing your frontal lobe or something, kid. lol

    Don't you have an islamophobic hate rally to attend? Seriously kid, take your stinky-english-breath racist ass somewhere else. I don't feel like having a debate with a lobotomized cumstain.

  • @TheBelovedButterfly When you grow up, kid....you will learn that the world is not black and white. When you get to secondary school history class, you will learn that ww2 began in 1939 in europe, but started in 1937 for japan and china. You will learn many, many things when you grow up. But please kid, you're talking to a college educated individual here. Go debate someone else, like your fellow racists.

  • @TheBelovedButterfly And tell me again why i'm a "nazi"....because I said WW2 began in 1937 for China and Japan. Oh yeah. Sure they definately makes someone a nazi (lmfao)

    Kiddo, I think you're too paranoid to be on the internet, finish not brushing your teeth and get to school, kid...you need an education, obviously.

  • we should have let these two bastards (and i'm sorry to say, the idiots who chose to fight for these bastards)

    kill eachother off

    nazi germany and soviet russia

    we should have let them destory eachother

    we would have still seen the defeat of hitler AND STALIN

    even better

  • That would have been a good thing, sure. But wouldn't Germany be far harder to defeat when only fighting on one front and having the ressources of the whole of Russia? Imagine what could have happened if all the panzers from the eastern front had lined up on the coast of Normandy... You could always just nuke them, certainly. But by conventional means, I doubt it would have worked like that.

  • but russia was going to win fool. if russia conquers germany its gonna go to france and italy!.

  • If the Americans had waited and nazi germany defeated the soviet union then it is quite possible that the americans and british would have been defeated in europe, they struggled against the weaker soldiers stationed in france, what would they have done against the entire german army who were more expierenced with more sophisticated weapons . Also think about how many more would have died if the americans had waited .and vietnam whould have happened anyway

  • germany can never have defeated the soviet union. idiot

  • Comment removed

  • you are right

  • why do people always think germany can beat russia no it cant not even today!!!!!!!!

  • Stalin was worse than Hitler.

  • You know nothing.

  • @cahuber007 agreed.

  • Are the coloured footage around 3:00 mark from US or Jap ship?

  • None of this mattered to Roosevelt or Churchill, not a word was ever said. Russia also did a lot of territorial expansion in the East. They beat the Japanese and Chinese armies both, and solidified gains in that region also. However they waited to declare war AGAIN( had already a treaty with Japan) after the A-bomb was dropped. Hmmm.

  • They also said to the other allies they would eventually attack Japan.

  • It is totally obvious that the war in the pacific war should have been the first action. Who cares if Russia fell. The french have proven that they weren't worth the piss it took to save them.

  • if russia fell, hitler would have conquered the world. It was because of the millions of Russians who gave their lives that stopped the axis army

  • Stalin killed more people than Herr Hitler ever did.

    He took over half of Poland without firing a shot.

    The fleeing Polish Army was rounded up and shot.

    Yet no one declared war on them for violating Polish sovereignty. Nor did anyone threaten war for all the other territorial expansion that they did BEFORE Hitler even did the Czech partition.

  • Stalin was just as bad as hitler

  • I highly doubt they would have conquered the world.

  • Ok, daltonagre is a little repetative, and maybe even a little annoying, but as everyone else is so worked up I have got to admit its now amusing me. Keep up the good work!!

  • It's amazes me that the Japanese would attack Pearl Harbor with the US aircraft carriers away from base, surely that was their prime target, with spies, intelligence gathering etc how could they get that wrong - wrong it was and just as well

  • Fate, chance, luck, act of God... whatever. But you're right, still a puzzle...

  • My understanding is that they did think they were going to be there. The carriers were on their way to berth in Pearl but were delayed a day because of weather. So, act of nature helped out on that one.

  • This daltonagre mother fucker should be hung on a lamp post in brazil he is taking the piss i try and get him off here.

  • FUCK YOU

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more