Moon walks all faked! Radiation too strong and USA would never risk getting the asstronuts fried like the Hiroshima radiation burned victims. Also, there are lots of irrefutable pieces of evidence that prove all moon landings were faked. For example:
@bushsuxcheney -- The clip that he shows as "original" is obviously edited. It even cuts away and shows scenes other than the lunar video.
In the ACTUAL original, which we all heard come from the moon when it was broadcast LIVE, the audio delay was always there. In fact, it was a rather constant irritation.
Sibrel is a tosser who is only looking to get his fame a few bucks. They went to the moon. Live with it and get on with your life. Having stupid vids like this PROVES to me that you theorists constantly clutch at straws and you have nothing better to do. All of your arguments can be proved wrong....the LRO has photographed the landing sites (were they faked as well). The only way you'd believe it is if your asses were shot up up there so u could see the footprints yourself.
@dave46563 They did not go anywhere near the Moon. Live with it and get on with your life. If you continue to believe in fantasy, then expect people to take the piss out of you.
@APOLLOREALITY hell if people wanna take the piss out of me coz of something so trivial as that then i feel sorry for them. so how do you people explain the LRO images? they were made using PaintShop? or maybe some other type of photo editing software? maybe coz it was NASA who controlled it, they could edit pictures before they were released to the public. what a load of trash.
dont mind them, FACTS SAYS IT ALL: no other country and no other mission but the Apollo-missions, have ever been or even tried to go to the moon.. because of the "Van Allan Belt" wich is placed app. 500 miles into space straching 1000 of miles, and no human can survive the deadly radiation that youl get from going through it.. unless your safely behind a 5 meter thick lead-wall..
@kenlar67 -- You have no source for your silly "5 meter thick lead wall" with regard to a trip through the Van Allen belts. That's just a stupid made-up number that has nothing at all to do with the Van Allen belts.
If you're still not convinced, try typing these words on GOOGLE! (... Go and read up on the first site on the list that gives you GOOGLE!) ...... THE MOON LANDING HOAX ....
HOW TO WIN IN A COURT OF LAW ... WITHOUT A LAWYER!
Try typing these words on GOOGLE: ( APOLLO Research
Accepted the view, held by the Majority, named Is that NASA sent astronauts to the Moon and returned to Earth Them Safely - as reported by the space agency, as seen on TV and in the Apollo photos. )
Even if I had not studied all the evidence of fake photos and the rest of the smoking guns that clearly show that the moon landings were a hoax, I would be certain that they didn't go simply by the reactions of those astronauts when Bart Sibrel cornered them.
Innocent people who are telling the truth simply don't behave as most of them did. Eugene Cernan came across pretty well, I must admit, and he even sounded believable. But all the others blew it.
Admittedly it is not strict scientific proof, but as there is no other plausible explanation for the way all but one of those astronauts reacted to Sibrel, I believe they put the matter beyond a reasonable doubt.
All I see from your side is claims that swearing on a Bible is meaningless. But it wasn’t just the Bible they were running away from. Look at the terror on the face of Michael Collins and the panic that came over John Young.
To any knuckle dragging fucktards who don't believe we went to the moon just point a fucking laser at the mirror left on the surface you pond life scum
@Rockster969 It'd be easier to send a mirror there than to land on it in that pathetic thing they tell us they did it in. Being a knuckle dragging fucktard myself I feel sorry for anyone having to pretend he's a hero for the rest of his life knowing it's a lie.
@Rockster969 Why don't you do some research for once in a while. Being a knuckle dragging fucktard who didn't believe it at the time, I have had over 40 years in which to research the fakery.
How many years have you been doing research into the fake Apollo Moon missions? Very little by the looks of it. You may wish to look at the APOLLO FACTS page, and that will answer your stupid question about a laser mirror on the Moon, because basically there ain't any laser mirrors on the Moon.
You don't have to cheat a dishonest man -He take care of that himself...He must find it difficult to have taken the authority truth rather than his truth.
Psychological studies have shown that people who generally believe in conspiracy theories tend to be of the type that have little control over their own lives but at the same time hold strong personal feelings of freedom and indivuality. They seek meaning in their lives by blaming their lack of control over various institutions such as corrupt governments. Once believed, cognitive dissonance then takes hold to the point of disregarding all evidence to the contrary.
That's not guilt! Armstrong is a naturally, very quiet, nervous, unconfident guy infront of camera, Remember he's not an actor he's a Navy Test Pilot. IF NASA wanted to really do a Billion Dollar fake they'd have found a better actor.............think about that and accept he walked on our moon.
@andschannll Ad Onor del Vero l'uomo non è ancora andato sulla Luna !
Troverete le prove schiaccianti digitando su GOOGLE " WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON "
Se invece preferite continuare a credere che dodici astronauti americani sono stati sulla Luna, fate pure così ! - CONTENTI VOI CONTENTI TUTTI !! ( ...soprattutto quelli che vi hanno sonoramente turlupinati ! - AH ! AH ! AH ! AH ! )
Ciao a tutti dalla meravigliosa PADANIA e, se potete, cercate almeno di starmi bene !
Who know why he look sad? Maybe that he got a hard time on his own life. Think in good way for him please. I'm look likely the same he face when i'm broken heart from some one. We are the human. Peace!
A muslims is not muslims anymore when know the fact that an odinary man landed on the moon. Why? because according to Muhammad their prophet claiming that he is the only person had landed in the moon with the help of the "flying horse" at the month of Rammadan. The moon according to the Prophet is hangging at the 3rd level of the sky that no others man will reached. One of the reason why Neil Armstrong was on the run because the posibilty of being killed by those has the interest..
He doesn't look "sad" or "guilty" to me. He looks MOVED. Plus, the man just went to the moon ferchrissake, it's got to be a bit of a let-down. How do you top it? Where do you go from there? Holy shit my life is over!
Well all I can say is, 1969-70, landed on the moon 6 times, no loss of life or any other related problems, cancers, radiation burns etc., up to 2011 never been higher than 400 miles, lost 14 lives, and that's progress, reverse the figures, that's progress.
The biggest lie told by NASA. Watch current video feed from the shuttle and the Mir space station...in the earth's orbit, there's a (2-5 second time delay in the video feed), but no time delay on the moon,!?
Neil Armstrong supposedly takes the first step on the moon's surface; who is holding the camera position 0:4 - 0:14, and when they leave the moon who is holding the camera?
Why didn't a second landing take place..? Because it couldn't be done!
All I ask is, look at the press interview of Aldrin, Shephard and Collins, do they look like men who have just achieved the greatest feat in human history, no they don't, they look more like a bunch of school kids put in front of class for stealing, one guy who said he was an ex-counsillor replied and said they looked perfectly normal for ex-moon landers I replied no wonder he was an ex-counsillor with observations like that, got no reply of course.
Its pretty obvious to anybody not completely brainwashed and so weakened by the lies they've been fed by this government that Armstrong has been shouldering this incredible lie for 40+ years.
@Ghenghy -- Yes. Armstrong and the tens of thousands of others who have never come forward.
Do you have ANY clue what it would take to "hoax" the Apollo missions?
They were just about the most widely independently-verified events in the history of mankind.
There is actually no way to "hoax" anything in astronomy because the people who would even think of doing such a thing would know with 100% certainty that they would be found out within a few decades at most.
@prosperomage "tens of thousands?" Where in the hell did you get that number? And who exactly is it that verified these missions took place, uh would that be NASA? LOL The Russians didnt have tracking you moron, they were dependent on us until 1976 to track their own probes.
hey genius ig you google it you'll find observatories from all over THE FUCKING WORLD followed the Apollo shots by telescope on their way to the moon, with pictures of it.Stupid fuck shit.
@Ghenghy -- OK. How many people would have been involved in building the HUGE sound stage? How many people would have been involved in production, filming, editing? So that's thousands already without even mentioning the real engineers who built and tested the real hardware and certified it for human flight.
Do you have ANY concept of what is involved in even the certification of a simple aircraft? Or what is involved in certifying a jet or a space craft?
@Ghenghy - Of course the Russians could track it. There were dishes all over the world that could. The actually film was relayed from the Parkes Observatory in Australia. You honestly think NASA was the only ones with the tech? Everyone had it.
PEOPLE BORN AFTER 1970: It wasn't just on TV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There were millions who saw the launches from Florida--the single greatest step of the mission, the thousands of navy personnel who saw the capsules appear in the sky and the parachutes billowing, the astronauts climbing out, the scientists who independently examined the moon rocks, the observatories that tracked the spacecraft across the skies, etc. etc. etc. etc. are you calling them all liars? Then you go to hell!
I think Armstrong is honest; someone dishonest does not feel guilt.
He did not directly speak out, but even the engineers who sabotaged the project could not speak out.
I think that those who disapprove the project and are ashamed about it cannot speak because the CIA locks everything; the CIA could forge a false record of felony against anybody who would oppose it (or even murder him).
This is the reason why they cannot directly speak out.
@hunchbacked they worked on both too,gruman created the lunar module and tested in Earth and moon orbit before Apollo 11, North American Aviation created the command and service module, no problem with both vehicles, initial designs the Lunar Module was simply too heavy and they got ride of the seats and made the windows smaller, constant communication between the astronauts and an "army" of engineers in Houston was critical to ensure the incredible success of the Apollo 11 mission.
The engineers who worked on the lunar module fucked up the job; they were required to create a lunar module that they knew that it would never fly to the moon.
I have studied the documentation of the lunar module and found nothing but incoherences, and all of them intentional; they refused to collaborate by sabotaging the Apollo project which is a real shame for America.
@hunchbacked Well but the lunar modules really went to the moon the descent stages are in the pictures sent by the The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Japan Selene Probe sent images of the Apollo 15 landing site, The ascent stage of Apollo 10 is in orbit around the sun, the russians tracked the apollo 11 mission, maybe you need to study more.
@hunchbacked What a load of tripe. There's not a single image manipulation expert or lunar geologist in the world who supports your ridiculous accusation.
Just saying this does not make it true. Obvious photoshops... my fucking ass. You couldn't prove this if your life depended on it.
@hunchbacked Well I don´t see any scientist complaining, the retroreflectors on the moon surface are still operational, civilian people detected and recorded the transmissions between the astronauts and the command module, the Jodrel Bank Observatory in the UK tracked Apollo 11 and also the Luna 15 from Russia which crashed on the moon, the Russians tracked all the Apollo missions and they were the enemies and never found a hoax.
I have already seen someone on youtube who said to be an expert on missiles and satellites and who said not to believe in Apollo, but he refused to say more; he then said that he did not want to be bothered and refused to say more.
Most of those who doubt prefer to keep silent not to get into trouble.
@hunchbacked Then he is an idiot claiming to be an expert with no proof which is why he didnt want to say more...He doesnt want to be called out and made a fool of...Here, watch this...."I am an expert in photoshop and have 72 years of photo experience...I have looked though all the photo and have determined they are all fake...I'm not going to say anymore or prove my claims" see how that works now...:P
He does not claim to be an expert in photography, but he is an expert on space flight, and he judges that the way that the LM and the CM behave on the videos is abnormal.
@hunchbacked -- And yet you still don't acknowledge that you were wrong about one of the things that you were so sure you were right about.
My diagram clearly shows that the camera that took the picture of the command module could not possibly have been able to see the service module as you claim it should have.
@hunchbacked -- You have obviously never worked in aerospace. (No. Don't even think about claiming that you have.)
You obviously know nothing about aerospace quality assurance and its multiple levels of redundant testing and verification and documentation by not several, not dozens, but hundreds and hundreds of engineers, technicians, production control, etc, etc.
There is no such thing as "refuse to collaborate" in aerospace design, production & QA. It is impossible.
@hunchbacked -- OK. You might be able to fool some people with what you're saying about the engineering of the lunar module, but just between the two of us, you and I both know that you are just making up a crap story.
You know that you're making up a crap story because you're the one who is making it up.
I know you're making up a crap story because I am actually familiar with the process..
@prosperomage I have been following hunchbacked for some time, and while I cannot be sure I think it probable that he really does believe the crap he says. That is, he suffers from an honest self delusion and is not deliberately lying.
I know this can be hard to accept given the obvious absurdity of many of his arguments and the ease with which they can be rebutted with facts and logic. But it seems more likely than not.
@ApolloWasReal -- Oh, I know he's sincere. I've known that for a long time. And he's just about the most dilligently sincere of all of them. He's not just a follower like most.
But that's the sad part.
And that's why I said what I did to rattle him a little bit.
He makes up stuff and he believes it himself, like his "fact" that they used very few engineers on the LM design & development. It's just not possible to do things that way in an aerospace company.
@prosperomage Hunchbacked, as well ArcAngel4Myke or whatever the fuck is name is. These guys are just fucking fearmongering fucktards who are absolutely convinced we didnt land on the moon. They spread all this bullshit around, and it spreads and spreads like a plague. Clearly smart people like you are on to his bs, you just have to keep telling hte truth man.
@MassTransit999 -- Actually, it's kind of entertaining to see if they can be made to understand anything.
But the hoax-theory cult members are already irrelevant. They make no difference to anything at all. The LRO photos have been rendered into 3D images and matched to photos from the surface from 40 years ago and they're a perfect match. There is only one way to do that, and that's to have been ON the surface 40 years ago. So there is already 100% proof of the reality of the Apollo missions.
@MassTransit999 -- Besides, within the next 2-3 years, a private, independently funded space craft from the Google Lunar X-Prize contest (look it up) will land on the moon, probably next to one of the old Apollo sites, because that's part of the prize. They will have a look around and see everything is still there.
And then there are all the other private ventures starting to go into space.
Nothing can stop the commercialization and exploration of space now.
@prosperomage Well I'll believe that when I see it. Not that I doubt your word either. Sorry Im not a hoaxer, but Im not a believer either. I'm kind of stuck in the middle and it really sucks.
@MassTransit999 -- Go ahead and doubt my word. I don't want anyone to just "believe" me either.
It can be a bit of work but if you make the effort to understand the physics of the lunar environment, you can: (1) compute for yourself that all of the hoax-theory arguments are nonsense; and (2) see in such things as the action of the dust being consistent with the motion of the astronauts, they are in a true 1/6 g environment with no "wires" or "slow motion."
@TheDeJureTour -- The thing about astronomy & space exploration, especially for an area as close as the moon is that, ultimately it is completely impossible to "hoax" anything for a long period of time. It's all right there to see. Even in 1969, multiple countries had the capability of sending robotic probes to the moon.
Anyone who would even THINK of "hoaxing" an Apollo project would know that they would be signing up for an almost 100% certainty of getting caught within their own lifetime.
@prosperomage I guess what I was driving at, was when NASA came out last year with it's proposed "no-fly zones" for the areas that are in the vicinity of the Apollo landing sites.
What are your thoughts about that? Is it over the top...or a necessity?
@TheDeJureTour -- As far as the "no fly zone" is concerned, the thought that you don't want to distrub the first human footsteps and leave them for posterity is cool, I guess. But I think they ought to have one of the 6 sites that's fair game.
In the long run, it doesn't really matter. You can see them from orbit anyway. Not as clearly with a mapping probe. But you can't stop a higher resolution camera from flying over.
If anything, technology has advanced a bit slower over the past 40 years than many people expected. Today, private companies, and not even large ones at that, are developing the capability of sending robotic explorers to the moon. In 1969, everyone had the full expectation that within 40 to 50 years, the moon (including the Apollo landing sites) could be swarming with independent observers.
And NASA can't have anything to say about it.
It would be silly to try to "fake" the Apollo missions.
@prosperomage Well, the sad but true facts are that other than the 24 Americans that went to the Moon (for the Apollo believers), no human being has been out from Earth more than 400 miles in 40 years.
That's just plain astounding. I still don't understand why the Russians didn't send at least a Cosmonaut or two around the Moon and back.
It's been 40 flippin' years! That's more time than transpired between the Wright brothers first flight and the first flight of a jet aircraft.
@TheDeJureTour -- Look up the Soviet N1 rocket. It was just about a powerful as the Saturn V. It was intended to carry Soviets to the moon.
4 flight tests. 4 explosions upon launch.
It had a fundamental flaw that created too much vibration in the several dozen motors that they tried to use (instead of the 5 large motors on the Saturn V)
@TheDeJureTour, And in the same 40 years, not much else has changed in aerospace. Boeing just now launched their first all-composite airliner (wow! [sarcasm]. It's 5 years behind schedule and it's wings still bend too much.)
1968, Boeing built the 747. Still building same 747.
1964: The U.S. SR-71. No longer flying.
1969: The British/French Concorde. No longer flying.
In 1957, U.S. first launched the Atlas orbital booster. Still using same booster with slight upgrade in motor plumbing.
@TheDeJureTour -- So without a Saturn V rocket (or equvalent) in production, you don't lift anything very large all the way to the moon.
And if you're not going all the way to the moon, then you're doing stuff in earth orbit (usually for extended periods of time, like months at a time instead of a couple hours) so, (1) there's no advantage to a higher orbit and (2) for that length of time, you want to avoid the Van Allen belts.
@hunchbacked If the LRO pictures are such obvious photoshops, then please demonstrate by producing your own false picture that no one can distinguish from an LRO picture of an Apollo site.
man this make it for me, i didnt beleive in the hoax before, but seing armstrong here just makes it, how can you doubt that is real proof there of a crackpot theory,
i guess also it proof armstrong is a illuminaty, and that aliens did train him to fake the landing with stanley kubrick, while the franc masson where sodomizing bart sibrel mother, you know that you cannot take me seriously cause im a disinformat agents working for the vatican and the prieure de sion, man, so simple,
Did these morons ever hear of telescope & radar following the mission?
YouTube is great, but it allows people with no science background to have a soapbox. YouTube should have a little discretion of what is placed on their site.
@cruisersism The 1st amendment stands foremost, obviously.. But to make statements that have no scientific basis if any at all, make this thread a joke & waste of time to peruse. I don't deny him the 1st, but as a doctor, many journal articles never make it to print from PhD/MDs, though they may place it it an a child's magazine. If I wrote a journal article that had no basis, it would not be published in a reputable journal--is that a denial of my 1st amendment right? .
@olimikeg i understand you, but this would end in an ideological discussion what should be public and what not. This is the great thing about youtube, people come together and present their worldview and opinion etc doesnt matter how ridiculuos they might sound. If you would for example remove creationist propaganda or apollo hoax vids than we wouldnt have so much to laugh and to debunk
I see that he is profoundly touched by the credits he gets from all mankind at this point in time in history. Although its a huge achievement for a man who put his live on the line, he knows he gets the spotlight on behalf of the thousands of people involved in the success of Appolo 11. Lots of mixed emotions indeed- but certainly not guit here :)
@SonsOfNihil I wish I'd said that. The poster of this video has the critical analysis of a salad bar compared to you, right on the money. I'm from Lebanon Ohio, not that it matters, but that's a perfect place commute between Wapakoneta and Uni. of Cincinnati.
YOU CAN SEE BUT CLEARLY YOU ARE BLIND !!!!!! HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHLLHLHHOHOOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOOHOHOHHOHEHEHEHEHEHEHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHOHOOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH
that way no one can say its fake, i work for the government and i can tell you how many times they lie or tell us one thing and it turns out to be another. that way if another country takes pictures it will shut everyone up about it being fake or real. i dont trust anything nasa puts out, sorry, their just corrupt
Actually, the Indian Satellite Chandrayaan 1 took photos of the Apollo 15 landing site in 2009. Of course, conspiracy theorists claimed this was a collusion between the ISRO and NASA.
Prakash Chauhan, a scientist from the ISRO (Indian Space Research Organisation) stated that these photos "reconfirmed the veracity of the Apollo 15 mission", so there is certainly evidence from organisations outside of NASA, but don't be surprised when people just claim it's part of the cover-up ;)
I'll give it a go shortly, youTube keeps reporting an error, no matter how much I try to disguise the URL's at the moment, could be a server issue, so I'll give it another go in a couple of hours :)
Just Remember Nasa Is Releasing This, They Lie About So Many Things, You Dont Know If They Are Telling The Truth Or Not. You Have To Remember, NASA Is Not A Civilian Agency Is A government Agency. I Think The Best Way To Settle This Is To Get Another Country Like Britain ,russia, or whatever country has the capability to take pictures of the lunar surface.
My Entry : 'I walked on the Moon for Americans and all the humanity everywhere. I consider myself to be no better than any of you. I appreciate, but do not crave the attention and accolades that have been given me. I just did my job.'
2001 a space odysee was filmed three years before this bullshit hoax was perpetrated .. the lem could hold te crew in space suitd their wanst enough physical space and Armstrong is a lying sack of shit !
Nope. Finish first grade english, then spend 12 years studying science, and you MIGHT be able to understand the fact that we did go to the Moon. In the meantime calling Mr. Armstrong, who is a good, honest and courageous man, anything else is really just an ugly blemish on YOUR character.
@Blahblobify peee yuuuu......your face smells just like an asshole.....looks just like an asshole....your wife says your an asshole......must be true....and NASA would probably swear to it......."asshole"...lol...!!!
Maybe he's just depressed because he had just had a humbling experience and knew he had returned to the kind of planet that contained people who would, 50 years later, be denying it even happened. I suspect travelling to another world gives you some perspective on Humanity.
To quote Neil himself, "I held up my thumb and it blotted out the Earth, I didn't feel big, I felt very, very small".
Sure, because slipping into infantile behaviour is absolute proof that you are right...
It's stupidity like yours that helps to undermine any authenticity that ever belonged to those who have concerns about the reality of the Moon landing, so thanks for that, you prop up those you oppose by making yourself look like a 6-year old.
But surely, most of the hoaxies have the mental age of a six year old? Did you ever come across one that did anything except childish name calling? I'll bet not.
its a very very sad and depressing video of a Man whos a hero to just went to the Moon.... to then wathc all 3 ARMSTRONG GUILT VIDEOS IT THEN BECOME VERY CLEAR, SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG, hMM bUZZ BECAME AN ALCOHOLIC AFTER HIS RETURN WTF.... heros that wen to the Moon act like that..... Hmmmmm
The biteing of his lip (indicates he wants to say something), then looking down says, I cant I tell the truth and it hurts so very bad, then his straight mouth tells, us hes just going to have to except the lie for the betterment of America, then at very last the self ressureing smile, he tells himself its going to ok, I can do thiS. Just watch the video about 5- 10 times its very easy to see.
I do not see a tired /exhausted man, I see a man in a mental tortured state, realizeing he is protected the Country he loves, but is wearing the lies on his shirt, those emotions are of extreme, sadness and of a man desperately want to say the truth.....
No his Body launguage says" wow here I sit haveing my concious EAT ME ALIVE because I have to lie to Amercia/Russians to make it seem that we are most advanced leading into the cold war, when in Fact they never went to the moon, and everytapers video he says cryptic, phrases, never once being proud in a real way to make you believe ( not swearing on a bible)?????? Now thats just weird as well. Complie all the evidence and NO MOON LANDING, believe it happened =SHEEP.
Hes been forced to lie and cover-up the truth.. The radiation belt thats exsists beyond our planet FRIED THE CHIMPANZEEE they sent up before hand, that is why its all lies, no civilaszation has ever been to the moon.
@jonescool1fly Wow, you really need help man. There is no "radiation belt". Also, no chimp ever got high enough to reach the MAGNETIC FIELD. Please go back to 6th grade and learn some science. Some spelling lessons wouldn't hurt either.
Let me get this straight. A few seconds of a tired but smiling Neil Armstrong, just back from the very first landing on the moon, means....what, exactly?
@ApolloWasReal Another pretender throwing some hoax conspiracy bullshit on the wall to see how much of it will stick, trying to see how many idiots he/she can get to say, "Ooooooo, did you see that? He has guilt written all over his face!"
Either that or the feds are secretly making videos like this to see how people respond, so as to make sure that NONE of the ones who buy into this crap EVER end up getting a jury summons.
@Astrobrant2 Hey, that's actually not a bad idea. If I ever have to pick a jury, I'll be sure to exclude anyone who thinks Apollo was faked. It'd be conclusive proof of an inability to think clearly.
Let's launch 3000 tons straight up, 13 times without loss, but we'll fake the part where we land 14 tons in1/6thG on the moon....because that's way harder than the launch.
We should also fake the landings on the Earth faciing side, so that when optical technology evolves to the point where people can see we didn't land, we can make asses out of all the Apollo teams and their familes...and the entire country as a bonus
Apollo deniers. Proof you can train vegetables to speak.
@normbreyfogle He seemed guilty to me! But it's well known that it is hard to judge someone's emotions via their facial features unless you really know them well personally - and even then, it can still be hard to tell - its all to do with psychology and how we required the ability to hide our thoughts and emotions during evolution
@CokeSupply You say he seemed guilty to you (with an exclamation point) and then waffle about it being difficult to tell. Since you don't know the man, have no idea what was being said or done at the time, I think it would be safe to say it's IMPOSSIBLE to tell anything.
What I know about Armstrong is that he has always had shy mannerisms. What more do you make out of it?
And even if it WAS guilt, guilt of what? "C'mon Neil, you peed on the mailbox at the party last night, didn't you?"
PT12, long hall flights, like that to Mars will need a "Hardened" room for the crew to seek shelter during Solar Flares. All spaceflight involved increased exposure to radiation, healthy people, good diet and in some cases medication will overcome most of it.
The Apollo crews were the first to see flashes of light while they had their eye's closed, which they found rather disturbing, these are small radiation particles interacting with the gell in the eyeball, causing a flick of light.
PT11, Because space is free of air molecules, you can travel as fast as you like, with no friction or surface heating (the Concord grows several inches in lengh at mach 2, due to skin friction heating from air) you can travel at 30,000kmh in space, be the shape of a brick, have walls a few times thicker then paper and not have a problem if there wern't any Solar Flares, Micro Meteorites or space junk, so we build the outside like a bullet proof vest, balistic ceramics, kevlar mesh.
@1BustedMyth There are actually more clever ways to deal with micrometeorites. Rather than rely on a thick and heavy layer of a strong material like kevlar, make two relatively thin layers with space between them. When a hypervelocity particle hits the outer layer, it fragments into much smaller pieces that spray out in the empty space so when they hit the inner layer they're more likely to be stopped. This is the widely used "Whipple shield", and it can also provide thermal insulation.
@ApolloWasReal, Thanks appreciate the comment, I've seen the shield but didn't know what it was called. I've dealt a little with balistics and its great to see this kind of lateral thinking. Bullet proof vest for a spacecraft! ;) all the best
PT10, All this equipement has been made to be as light and strong as it possibly can because there is no way we could otherwise launch it. It only has to last for one use, so its built to do the job but be disposable. The Ascent stage was crumpled when the rocket fired, but not enough to be a problem, the pressure inside and the vacuum outside helped it keep its shape, to get it light enough with all the systems, it was virtually a metal balloon around 0.020 inch thick in parts
PT9, As they get closer, they slow their rate of decent, start looking for the landing site, if the saite is clear, they commit and land, the motor on the lander was the very first rocket with a throttle ever built. Meal, sleep, EVA suites on, out to do science. Surface time few hours to few days, When done the Commander presses the launch button, the craft splits in two, the lower section stays on the Moon, the motor in the top half fires and they go back to dock with the Command module.
PT8, When ready, two crew climb into the lander, close the hatch, undock from the Command Module, leaving the third to stay in orbit. They extend the landing gear and get the CM to check, commit to decent by firing motor in the opposite direction to wash off orbit speed, start the decent, they lock the Rendezvous Radar onto the CM that feeds the flight computer, so they can reacquire it on their way back, they lock the landing radar onto the Moon surface some +-70km below,
PT7, Apollo flights would carry out checks on systems at that height, seperate the craft, dock with and extract the Lunar Lander, have a meal a sleep, then the next day, all being well, they are given the go for TLI: trans Lunar Injection, they leave Earth orbit and start on the 3'1/2 day trip to the Moon some 300,000km away, on arival they go into orbit around the moon, have a meal, sleep, next power up the Lander, text the systems, especially the two Radar systems for landind and docking.
PT6, On lauch you use vast amounts of fuel, travel faster then a bullet, high G loading, at around 150,000ft you turn further east into a paralet to Earth path and continue to accelerate to around 24,000kph, this is Orbital Speed, you can then shut the engines down, due to no atmosphere you will keep that speed, just need to top it up every 24hrs with a quick burn, your altitude is around 250km, The Shuttle will stay there or continue up to 500km to dock with the International Space Station.
PT5, Spacecraft are a whole different ball game! the launch phase is a pain in the arse because it requires huge amounts of fuel for a tiny spacecraft, hugely expensive, noisy and expensive , this is the very reason we are looking feverishly at other options that do not use rockets or at least not frrom the surface, like high altitude ballon launch, Space Elevator and launching from a high altitude mothership aircraft eg: White Knight Space Ship1 system from scaled compsites
PT4, Rip one wing off, turn it the other way, mount both at the root on a rotating shaft connected to a motor and you have a Rotary Wing Aircraft, the formal name for a Helicopter, it prodused lift in one spot and can go straight up. Most people think they fall out of the sky if the engine stops, but they have a glide ability just like a plane, called Autorotation and if mangaged well you can put the aircraft down in very tight spots with no damage.
PT3, As soon as your outside an atmosphere then design charactoristics change completely! Aircraft "Fly" using Wings and the principle we call the Aerofoil Section, that produces lift by creating a low pressure above the wing, the wing is then sucked up into it, wing goes up, the engine is only there to push the wing through the air and produce this effect, thats how Hang gliders can work without and engine and planes don't fall out of the sky when their engine stops: they glide.
PT2, Space and the Moon have no atmosphere, there is almost nothing at all. Earth has a very dense collection of gas wrapped around it, its standard pressure is 1013mb and reduces as you climb +-4% for every 1000ft. Its this thick gas that A: allows us to fly, B; Dictates how we must design an aircraft (least resistance) and as we accelerate through the sound barrier these gas molecules get compressed on the nose of the aircraft, when the nose pushes through, we get a Sonic Boom.
Moon walks all faked! Radiation too strong and USA would never risk getting the asstronuts fried like the Hiroshima radiation burned victims. Also, there are lots of irrefutable pieces of evidence that prove all moon landings were faked. For example:
Go to this site and study it well.
andrewlongman(dot)com/?tag=moon-problems
bushsuxcheney 1 day ago
@bushsuxcheney -- The clip that he shows as "original" is obviously edited. It even cuts away and shows scenes other than the lunar video.
In the ACTUAL original, which we all heard come from the moon when it was broadcast LIVE, the audio delay was always there. In fact, it was a rather constant irritation.
prosperomage 6 seconds ago
Sibrel is a tosser who is only looking to get his fame a few bucks. They went to the moon. Live with it and get on with your life. Having stupid vids like this PROVES to me that you theorists constantly clutch at straws and you have nothing better to do. All of your arguments can be proved wrong....the LRO has photographed the landing sites (were they faked as well). The only way you'd believe it is if your asses were shot up up there so u could see the footprints yourself.
dave46563 1 day ago
@dave46563 They did not go anywhere near the Moon. Live with it and get on with your life. If you continue to believe in fantasy, then expect people to take the piss out of you.
APOLLOREALITY 1 day ago
@APOLLOREALITY hell if people wanna take the piss out of me coz of something so trivial as that then i feel sorry for them. so how do you people explain the LRO images? they were made using PaintShop? or maybe some other type of photo editing software? maybe coz it was NASA who controlled it, they could edit pictures before they were released to the public. what a load of trash.
dave46563 23 hours ago
dont mind them, FACTS SAYS IT ALL: no other country and no other mission but the Apollo-missions, have ever been or even tried to go to the moon.. because of the "Van Allan Belt" wich is placed app. 500 miles into space straching 1000 of miles, and no human can survive the deadly radiation that youl get from going through it.. unless your safely behind a 5 meter thick lead-wall..
kenlar67 1 week ago
@kenlar67 -- You have no source for your silly "5 meter thick lead wall" with regard to a trip through the Van Allen belts. That's just a stupid made-up number that has nothing at all to do with the Van Allen belts.
Why do people make up crap like that?
I'd really like to know.
prosperomage 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you're still not convinced, try typing these words on GOOGLE! (... Go and read up on the first site on the list that gives you GOOGLE!) ...... THE MOON LANDING HOAX ....
HOW TO WIN IN A COURT OF LAW ... WITHOUT A LAWYER!
LEARN HOW TO KEEP YOUR PRIVACY
ettoremazza7 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Try typing these words on GOOGLE: ( APOLLO Research
Accepted the view, held by the Majority, named Is that NASA sent astronauts to the Moon and returned to Earth Them Safely - as reported by the space agency, as seen on TV and in the Apollo photos. )
ettoremazza7 3 weeks ago
Even if I had not studied all the evidence of fake photos and the rest of the smoking guns that clearly show that the moon landings were a hoax, I would be certain that they didn't go simply by the reactions of those astronauts when Bart Sibrel cornered them.
Innocent people who are telling the truth simply don't behave as most of them did. Eugene Cernan came across pretty well, I must admit, and he even sounded believable. But all the others blew it.
They never went, and Sibrel proved it.
BritishTruthSeeker 3 weeks ago
@BritishTruthSeeker If that is your definition of "proof", then you are indeed a damned idiot.
mkp823 3 days ago
@mkp823
Admittedly it is not strict scientific proof, but as there is no other plausible explanation for the way all but one of those astronauts reacted to Sibrel, I believe they put the matter beyond a reasonable doubt.
All I see from your side is claims that swearing on a Bible is meaningless. But it wasn’t just the Bible they were running away from. Look at the terror on the face of Michael Collins and the panic that came over John Young.
They didn't go to the moon. Live with it.
BritishTruthSeeker 3 days ago
To any knuckle dragging fucktards who don't believe we went to the moon just point a fucking laser at the mirror left on the surface you pond life scum
Rockster969 1 month ago
@Rockster969 It'd be easier to send a mirror there than to land on it in that pathetic thing they tell us they did it in. Being a knuckle dragging fucktard myself I feel sorry for anyone having to pretend he's a hero for the rest of his life knowing it's a lie.
Saparonia 1 month ago
@Rockster969 Why don't you do some research for once in a while. Being a knuckle dragging fucktard who didn't believe it at the time, I have had over 40 years in which to research the fakery.
How many years have you been doing research into the fake Apollo Moon missions? Very little by the looks of it. You may wish to look at the APOLLO FACTS page, and that will answer your stupid question about a laser mirror on the Moon, because basically there ain't any laser mirrors on the Moon.
APOLLOREALITY 4 weeks ago 5
@APOLLOREALITY do you think man landed on the moon or not?
iichingg 1 week ago
@APOLLOREALITY Yo Apollo truther, lol!
If they didn't make it to the moon why didn't the russians tell us they didn't?
They were watching and listening and would have blown the whistle for sure.
Rockster969 14 hours ago
@Rockster969 Good GOD you're an idiot...
DSVetDad 1 week ago
You don't have to cheat a dishonest man -He take care of that himself...He must find it difficult to have taken the authority truth rather than his truth.
THREESIXNINE100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Psychological studies have shown that people who generally believe in conspiracy theories tend to be of the type that have little control over their own lives but at the same time hold strong personal feelings of freedom and indivuality. They seek meaning in their lives by blaming their lack of control over various institutions such as corrupt governments. Once believed, cognitive dissonance then takes hold to the point of disregarding all evidence to the contrary.
Rob260259 1 month ago
That's not guilt! Armstrong is a naturally, very quiet, nervous, unconfident guy infront of camera, Remember he's not an actor he's a Navy Test Pilot. IF NASA wanted to really do a Billion Dollar fake they'd have found a better actor.............think about that and accept he walked on our moon.
andschannll 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@andschannll Ad Onor del Vero l'uomo non è ancora andato sulla Luna !
Troverete le prove schiaccianti digitando su GOOGLE " WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON "
Se invece preferite continuare a credere che dodici astronauti americani sono stati sulla Luna, fate pure così ! - CONTENTI VOI CONTENTI TUTTI !! ( ...soprattutto quelli che vi hanno sonoramente turlupinati ! - AH ! AH ! AH ! AH ! )
Ciao a tutti dalla meravigliosa PADANIA e, se potete, cercate almeno di starmi bene !
Ettore
ettoremazza7 1 month ago
Who know why he look sad? Maybe that he got a hard time on his own life. Think in good way for him please. I'm look likely the same he face when i'm broken heart from some one. We are the human. Peace!
visridej 1 month ago
the world may at the great danger when they know their faith are partly corrupt by a great corrupter...
55immanuel 1 month ago
A muslims is not muslims anymore when know the fact that an odinary man landed on the moon. Why? because according to Muhammad their prophet claiming that he is the only person had landed in the moon with the help of the "flying horse" at the month of Rammadan. The moon according to the Prophet is hangging at the 3rd level of the sky that no others man will reached. One of the reason why Neil Armstrong was on the run because the posibilty of being killed by those has the interest..
55immanuel 1 month ago
He doesn't look "sad" or "guilty" to me. He looks MOVED. Plus, the man just went to the moon ferchrissake, it's got to be a bit of a let-down. How do you top it? Where do you go from there? Holy shit my life is over!
MrMZaccone 2 months ago
oh wow.. he looks indeed quite SAd contrary to the others ..wondering what in hell he was thinking there.. when everyone was cheering?
Vann7 2 months ago
This video is more like "Neil Armstrong stoned out of his mind"
MassTransit999 2 months ago
Well all I can say is, 1969-70, landed on the moon 6 times, no loss of life or any other related problems, cancers, radiation burns etc., up to 2011 never been higher than 400 miles, lost 14 lives, and that's progress, reverse the figures, that's progress.
thecubanism 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The biggest lie told by NASA. Watch current video feed from the shuttle and the Mir space station...in the earth's orbit, there's a (2-5 second time delay in the video feed), but no time delay on the moon,!?
Neil Armstrong supposedly takes the first step on the moon's surface; who is holding the camera position 0:4 - 0:14, and when they leave the moon who is holding the camera?
Why didn't a second landing take place..? Because it couldn't be done!
ssjcomix 2 months ago
All I ask is, look at the press interview of Aldrin, Shephard and Collins, do they look like men who have just achieved the greatest feat in human history, no they don't, they look more like a bunch of school kids put in front of class for stealing, one guy who said he was an ex-counsillor replied and said they looked perfectly normal for ex-moon landers I replied no wonder he was an ex-counsillor with observations like that, got no reply of course.
thecubanism 2 months ago
He's got a weird pedophile face !
mrstevoh123 2 months ago
This video proves nothing. His emotions can be taken any which way you want it to.
trizign 2 months ago 2
sold your soul to the devil.
144000V 2 months ago
Its pretty obvious to anybody not completely brainwashed and so weakened by the lies they've been fed by this government that Armstrong has been shouldering this incredible lie for 40+ years.
Ghenghy 3 months ago
@Ghenghy He should come clean but then they will take him out if he did. Illuminati run things, they are the
real ones in charged and not the President.
jpsmart59 3 months ago
@Ghenghy -- Yes. Armstrong and the tens of thousands of others who have never come forward.
Do you have ANY clue what it would take to "hoax" the Apollo missions?
They were just about the most widely independently-verified events in the history of mankind.
There is actually no way to "hoax" anything in astronomy because the people who would even think of doing such a thing would know with 100% certainty that they would be found out within a few decades at most.
prosperomage 2 months ago
@prosperomage "tens of thousands?" Where in the hell did you get that number? And who exactly is it that verified these missions took place, uh would that be NASA? LOL The Russians didnt have tracking you moron, they were dependent on us until 1976 to track their own probes.
Ghenghy 2 months ago
@Ghenghy
hey genius ig you google it you'll find observatories from all over THE FUCKING WORLD followed the Apollo shots by telescope on their way to the moon, with pictures of it.Stupid fuck shit.
Blahblobify 2 months ago
@Ghenghy -- OK. How many people would have been involved in building the HUGE sound stage? How many people would have been involved in production, filming, editing? So that's thousands already without even mentioning the real engineers who built and tested the real hardware and certified it for human flight.
Do you have ANY concept of what is involved in even the certification of a simple aircraft? Or what is involved in certifying a jet or a space craft?
No. Didn't think so.
prosperomage 2 months ago
@Ghenghy - Of course the Russians could track it. There were dishes all over the world that could. The actually film was relayed from the Parkes Observatory in Australia. You honestly think NASA was the only ones with the tech? Everyone had it.
WillShakespeare2007 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PEOPLE BORN AFTER 1970: It wasn't just on TV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There were millions who saw the launches from Florida--the single greatest step of the mission, the thousands of navy personnel who saw the capsules appear in the sky and the parachutes billowing, the astronauts climbing out, the scientists who independently examined the moon rocks, the observatories that tracked the spacecraft across the skies, etc. etc. etc. etc. are you calling them all liars? Then you go to hell!
charliegoodboy 4 months ago
Very good video.Notice the clown No2 in the end.
ApolloWasRealHoax 4 months ago
It's up to people from outside to expose the project; then they'll speak out, including Armstrong.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
I think Armstrong is honest; someone dishonest does not feel guilt.
He did not directly speak out, but even the engineers who sabotaged the project could not speak out.
I think that those who disapprove the project and are ashamed about it cannot speak because the CIA locks everything; the CIA could forge a false record of felony against anybody who would oppose it (or even murder him).
This is the reason why they cannot directly speak out.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@hunchbacked tell that to the 400,000 enginers and 20,000 companies who worked in the Apollo program
echozgus 4 months ago
@echozgus
They mainly worked on the saturn rocket, and there is no problem with the saturn rocket.
It's with the command module and the lunar module that there is a problem.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@hunchbacked they worked on both too,gruman created the lunar module and tested in Earth and moon orbit before Apollo 11, North American Aviation created the command and service module, no problem with both vehicles, initial designs the Lunar Module was simply too heavy and they got ride of the seats and made the windows smaller, constant communication between the astronauts and an "army" of engineers in Houston was critical to ensure the incredible success of the Apollo 11 mission.
echozgus 4 months ago
@echozgus
The engineers who worked on the lunar module fucked up the job; they were required to create a lunar module that they knew that it would never fly to the moon.
I have studied the documentation of the lunar module and found nothing but incoherences, and all of them intentional; they refused to collaborate by sabotaging the Apollo project which is a real shame for America.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@hunchbacked Well but the lunar modules really went to the moon the descent stages are in the pictures sent by the The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Japan Selene Probe sent images of the Apollo 15 landing site, The ascent stage of Apollo 10 is in orbit around the sun, the russians tracked the apollo 11 mission, maybe you need to study more.
echozgus 4 months ago
@echozgus
The LRO pictures can easily be debunked; they are obvious photoshops, thet show anomalies.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@hunchbacked What a load of tripe. There's not a single image manipulation expert or lunar geologist in the world who supports your ridiculous accusation.
Just saying this does not make it true. Obvious photoshops... my fucking ass. You couldn't prove this if your life depended on it.
krisdevalle 4 months ago
@hunchbacked Well I don´t see any scientist complaining, the retroreflectors on the moon surface are still operational, civilian people detected and recorded the transmissions between the astronauts and the command module, the Jodrel Bank Observatory in the UK tracked Apollo 11 and also the Luna 15 from Russia which crashed on the moon, the Russians tracked all the Apollo missions and they were the enemies and never found a hoax.
echozgus 4 months ago
@echozgus
Some do.
But most prefer to keep silent.
I have already seen someone on youtube who said to be an expert on missiles and satellites and who said not to believe in Apollo, but he refused to say more; he then said that he did not want to be bothered and refused to say more.
Most of those who doubt prefer to keep silent not to get into trouble.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@hunchbacked maybe he is silent because he doesn´t have any good argument or proof just a bunch of videos on youtube.
echozgus 4 months ago
@echozgus
No, he hasn't made any video, not that I know.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@hunchbacked Then he is an idiot claiming to be an expert with no proof which is why he didnt want to say more...He doesnt want to be called out and made a fool of...Here, watch this...."I am an expert in photoshop and have 72 years of photo experience...I have looked though all the photo and have determined they are all fake...I'm not going to say anymore or prove my claims" see how that works now...:P
Dmac11a666 3 months ago
@Dmac11a666
He does not claim to be an expert in photography, but he is an expert on space flight, and he judges that the way that the LM and the CM behave on the videos is abnormal.
hunchbacked 3 months ago
@hunchbacked And how did he explain this? What is his youtube name...Let me see what hes got....
Dmac11a666 3 months ago
@Dmac11a666
I don't remember his youtube name, it was quite some time ago, may be more than a year.
hunchbacked 3 months ago
@hunchbacked Then why would you believe him? He offered no explanation like most hoaxters....
Dmac11a666 3 months ago
@Dmac11a666
I believe him because I am also a specialist and I can also see the bullshit.
hunchbacked 3 months ago
@hunchbacked Explain your theory then? If you are a specialist, why would you need him to back up your claim? You could easily explain it....
Dmac11a666 3 months ago
@Dmac11a666
I have already made more than 200 videos to explain my theory and I have a site dedicated to it.
hunchbacked 3 months ago
@hunchbacked I just watched a funny video staring you..:P
Dmac11a666 3 months ago
@hunchbacked -- And yet you still don't acknowledge that you were wrong about one of the things that you were so sure you were right about.
My diagram clearly shows that the camera that took the picture of the command module could not possibly have been able to see the service module as you claim it should have.
Are all your claims so silly?
watch?v=hmxAk_PWdu4
prosperomage 3 months ago
@hunchbacked -- You have obviously never worked in aerospace. (No. Don't even think about claiming that you have.)
You obviously know nothing about aerospace quality assurance and its multiple levels of redundant testing and verification and documentation by not several, not dozens, but hundreds and hundreds of engineers, technicians, production control, etc, etc.
There is no such thing as "refuse to collaborate" in aerospace design, production & QA. It is impossible.
prosperomage 3 months ago
@prosperomage
This went for the saturn rocket; the documentation for the saturn rocket was effectively reviewed by several engineers and made seriously.
But, for the lunar module, few engineers worked, and they did what they wanted...as this lunar module would never land on the moon.
hunchbacked 3 months ago
@hunchbacked -- OK. You might be able to fool some people with what you're saying about the engineering of the lunar module, but just between the two of us, you and I both know that you are just making up a crap story.
You know that you're making up a crap story because you're the one who is making it up.
I know you're making up a crap story because I am actually familiar with the process..
So now I have just one question:
Why do you lie?
prosperomage 3 months ago
@prosperomage
The answer to your question:
I don't lie, I am honest, I follow my conviction, but you can't accept it.
My conviction does not come just from one thing but an incredible heap of things and in all domains.
hunchbacked 3 months ago
@prosperomage I have been following hunchbacked for some time, and while I cannot be sure I think it probable that he really does believe the crap he says. That is, he suffers from an honest self delusion and is not deliberately lying.
I know this can be hard to accept given the obvious absurdity of many of his arguments and the ease with which they can be rebutted with facts and logic. But it seems more likely than not.
ApolloWasReal 3 months ago
@ApolloWasReal -- Oh, I know he's sincere. I've known that for a long time. And he's just about the most dilligently sincere of all of them. He's not just a follower like most.
But that's the sad part.
And that's why I said what I did to rattle him a little bit.
He makes up stuff and he believes it himself, like his "fact" that they used very few engineers on the LM design & development. It's just not possible to do things that way in an aerospace company.
prosperomage 3 months ago
@prosperomage Hunchbacked, as well ArcAngel4Myke or whatever the fuck is name is. These guys are just fucking fearmongering fucktards who are absolutely convinced we didnt land on the moon. They spread all this bullshit around, and it spreads and spreads like a plague. Clearly smart people like you are on to his bs, you just have to keep telling hte truth man.
MassTransit999 2 months ago
@MassTransit999 -- Actually, it's kind of entertaining to see if they can be made to understand anything.
But the hoax-theory cult members are already irrelevant. They make no difference to anything at all. The LRO photos have been rendered into 3D images and matched to photos from the surface from 40 years ago and they're a perfect match. There is only one way to do that, and that's to have been ON the surface 40 years ago. So there is already 100% proof of the reality of the Apollo missions.
prosperomage 2 months ago
@MassTransit999 -- Besides, within the next 2-3 years, a private, independently funded space craft from the Google Lunar X-Prize contest (look it up) will land on the moon, probably next to one of the old Apollo sites, because that's part of the prize. They will have a look around and see everything is still there.
And then there are all the other private ventures starting to go into space.
Nothing can stop the commercialization and exploration of space now.
prosperomage 2 months ago
@prosperomage Well I'll believe that when I see it. Not that I doubt your word either. Sorry Im not a hoaxer, but Im not a believer either. I'm kind of stuck in the middle and it really sucks.
MassTransit999 2 months ago
@MassTransit999 -- Go ahead and doubt my word. I don't want anyone to just "believe" me either.
It can be a bit of work but if you make the effort to understand the physics of the lunar environment, you can: (1) compute for yourself that all of the hoax-theory arguments are nonsense; and (2) see in such things as the action of the dust being consistent with the motion of the astronauts, they are in a true 1/6 g environment with no "wires" or "slow motion."
Like this: watch?v=bDpwtnGS6uc
prosperomage 2 months ago
@prosperomage Do you really think that NASA is going to let anyone get anywhere close to the landing sites?
TheDeJureTour 5 days ago
@TheDeJureTour -- The thing about astronomy & space exploration, especially for an area as close as the moon is that, ultimately it is completely impossible to "hoax" anything for a long period of time. It's all right there to see. Even in 1969, multiple countries had the capability of sending robotic probes to the moon.
Anyone who would even THINK of "hoaxing" an Apollo project would know that they would be signing up for an almost 100% certainty of getting caught within their own lifetime.
prosperomage 5 days ago
@prosperomage I guess what I was driving at, was when NASA came out last year with it's proposed "no-fly zones" for the areas that are in the vicinity of the Apollo landing sites.
What are your thoughts about that? Is it over the top...or a necessity?
TheDeJureTour 4 days ago
@TheDeJureTour -- As far as the "no fly zone" is concerned, the thought that you don't want to distrub the first human footsteps and leave them for posterity is cool, I guess. But I think they ought to have one of the 6 sites that's fair game.
In the long run, it doesn't really matter. You can see them from orbit anyway. Not as clearly with a mapping probe. But you can't stop a higher resolution camera from flying over.
prosperomage 4 days ago
If anything, technology has advanced a bit slower over the past 40 years than many people expected. Today, private companies, and not even large ones at that, are developing the capability of sending robotic explorers to the moon. In 1969, everyone had the full expectation that within 40 to 50 years, the moon (including the Apollo landing sites) could be swarming with independent observers.
And NASA can't have anything to say about it.
It would be silly to try to "fake" the Apollo missions.
prosperomage 5 days ago
@prosperomage Well, the sad but true facts are that other than the 24 Americans that went to the Moon (for the Apollo believers), no human being has been out from Earth more than 400 miles in 40 years.
That's just plain astounding. I still don't understand why the Russians didn't send at least a Cosmonaut or two around the Moon and back.
It's been 40 flippin' years! That's more time than transpired between the Wright brothers first flight and the first flight of a jet aircraft.
TheDeJureTour 4 days ago
@TheDeJureTour -- Look up the Soviet N1 rocket. It was just about a powerful as the Saturn V. It was intended to carry Soviets to the moon.
4 flight tests. 4 explosions upon launch.
It had a fundamental flaw that created too much vibration in the several dozen motors that they tried to use (instead of the 5 large motors on the Saturn V)
prosperomage 4 days ago
@TheDeJureTour, And in the same 40 years, not much else has changed in aerospace. Boeing just now launched their first all-composite airliner (wow! [sarcasm]. It's 5 years behind schedule and it's wings still bend too much.)
1968, Boeing built the 747. Still building same 747.
1964: The U.S. SR-71. No longer flying.
1969: The British/French Concorde. No longer flying.
In 1957, U.S. first launched the Atlas orbital booster. Still using same booster with slight upgrade in motor plumbing.
prosperomage 4 days ago
@TheDeJureTour -- So without a Saturn V rocket (or equvalent) in production, you don't lift anything very large all the way to the moon.
And if you're not going all the way to the moon, then you're doing stuff in earth orbit (usually for extended periods of time, like months at a time instead of a couple hours) so, (1) there's no advantage to a higher orbit and (2) for that length of time, you want to avoid the Van Allen belts.
prosperomage 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hunchbacked
'The LRO pictures can easily be debunked; they are obvious photoshops, thet show anomalies.'
Then attempt to do so. You are so full of empty rhetoric. I could use a good laugh.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@hunchbacked If the LRO pictures are such obvious photoshops, then please demonstrate by producing your own false picture that no one can distinguish from an LRO picture of an Apollo site.
ApolloWasReal 3 months ago
leading title.apollo reality? I give you a flag and report for misleading.
kaostwenty2 4 months ago
man this make it for me, i didnt beleive in the hoax before, but seing armstrong here just makes it, how can you doubt that is real proof there of a crackpot theory,
i guess also it proof armstrong is a illuminaty, and that aliens did train him to fake the landing with stanley kubrick, while the franc masson where sodomizing bart sibrel mother, you know that you cannot take me seriously cause im a disinformat agents working for the vatican and the prieure de sion, man, so simple,
lapmarty 4 months ago
180 moon rocks were given to other nations. None of these nations found any evidence that they weren't from the moon.
StapleGunMS 5 months ago
@StapleGunMS
Because these nations never thought to analyze them; they just put them in museums.
And when a museum has the idea to analyze the rock, like the dutch museum recently, it gets a big surprise.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
Did these morons ever hear of telescope & radar following the mission?
YouTube is great, but it allows people with no science background to have a soapbox. YouTube should have a little discretion of what is placed on their site.
This #%&( just clutters everything up.
olimikeg 5 months ago
@olimikeg Its called free speech.
cruisersism 5 months ago
@cruisersism The 1st amendment stands foremost, obviously.. But to make statements that have no scientific basis if any at all, make this thread a joke & waste of time to peruse. I don't deny him the 1st, but as a doctor, many journal articles never make it to print from PhD/MDs, though they may place it it an a child's magazine. If I wrote a journal article that had no basis, it would not be published in a reputable journal--is that a denial of my 1st amendment right? .
olimikeg 5 months ago
Respond to this video...Its not the look of guilt on his Face, its the look of SHAME he has for his Government.
cruisersism 5 months ago
@olimikeg i understand you, but this would end in an ideological discussion what should be public and what not. This is the great thing about youtube, people come together and present their worldview and opinion etc doesnt matter how ridiculuos they might sound. If you would for example remove creationist propaganda or apollo hoax vids than we wouldnt have so much to laugh and to debunk
Serpico261 5 months ago
I see that he is profoundly touched by the credits he gets from all mankind at this point in time in history. Although its a huge achievement for a man who put his live on the line, he knows he gets the spotlight on behalf of the thousands of people involved in the success of Appolo 11. Lots of mixed emotions indeed- but certainly not guit here :)
SonsOfNihil 5 months ago 2
@SonsOfNihil I wish I'd said that. The poster of this video has the critical analysis of a salad bar compared to you, right on the money. I'm from Lebanon Ohio, not that it matters, but that's a perfect place commute between Wapakoneta and Uni. of Cincinnati.
Tweekerhead 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YOU CAN SEE BUT CLEARLY YOU ARE BLIND !!!!!! HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHLLHLHHOHOOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOOHOHOHHOHEHEHEHEHEHEHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHOHOOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOH
ywillburn 5 months ago
Even lie detector tests aren't flawless. I don't see how anyone can judge Armstrong's alleged "guilt" from this video.
normbreyfogle 5 months ago
that way no one can say its fake, i work for the government and i can tell you how many times they lie or tell us one thing and it turns out to be another. that way if another country takes pictures it will shut everyone up about it being fake or real. i dont trust anything nasa puts out, sorry, their just corrupt
mrmartin166 5 months ago
@mrmartin166
Actually, the Indian Satellite Chandrayaan 1 took photos of the Apollo 15 landing site in 2009. Of course, conspiracy theorists claimed this was a collusion between the ISRO and NASA.
Prakash Chauhan, a scientist from the ISRO (Indian Space Research Organisation) stated that these photos "reconfirmed the veracity of the Apollo 15 mission", so there is certainly evidence from organisations outside of NASA, but don't be surprised when people just claim it's part of the cover-up ;)
SuperOfficerDibble 5 months ago
@SuperOfficerDibble post the pics dude...just been looking and can't find any decent shots?? got any??
Youaresofullofshite 5 months ago
@Youaresofullofshite
I'll give it a go shortly, youTube keeps reporting an error, no matter how much I try to disguise the URL's at the moment, could be a server issue, so I'll give it another go in a couple of hours :)
SuperOfficerDibble 5 months ago
@SuperOfficerDibble
depletedcranium (dot) com (slash) apollo-15-confirmed-times-three
A link to some of the photos, though the site is obviously putting its own opinion forward quite firmly.
SuperOfficerDibble 5 months ago
@SuperOfficerDibble
ias (dot) ac (dot) in (slash) currsci (slash) sep102009 (slash) 630 (dot) pdf
Harder to turn youTube friendly, but an interesting PDF which is the scientific analysis of the photos that Chandrayaan provided.
Also :
thehindu (dot) com (slash) sci-tech (slash) article13950 (dot) ece
No photos, but an article regarding the talk given by Dr. Chauhan :)
SuperOfficerDibble 5 months ago
Just Remember Nasa Is Releasing This, They Lie About So Many Things, You Dont Know If They Are Telling The Truth Or Not. You Have To Remember, NASA Is Not A Civilian Agency Is A government Agency. I Think The Best Way To Settle This Is To Get Another Country Like Britain ,russia, or whatever country has the capability to take pictures of the lunar surface.
mrmartin166 5 months ago
NASA releases close up photos of 3 landing sites...
HOAXERS = fail
can't wait to read the new theories though I have a feeling the words "faked" or "photoshop" may pop up
Mattsretiring 5 months ago
watch?v=D3pGMjM8fq4
Straight from the horses mouth.
Reporter:"You seem uncomfortable with your celebrity status"..
1st moonhoaxer Armstrong: "I don't deserve it"..
potrodsas 6 months ago
@jhhwingnut
1. check your grammar
2. all of the crew on Apollo 13 lived in the LEM when they broke down!
firethain 6 months ago
CAPTION CONTEST:
Armstrong to himself: "When they eventually work out this is a massive hoax, are they just gotta pull me limb from limb or just slowly crucify me?"
DragonYearJoji 6 months ago
@DragonYearJoji
'CAPTION CONTEST:'
My Entry : 'I walked on the Moon for Americans and all the humanity everywhere. I consider myself to be no better than any of you. I appreciate, but do not crave the attention and accolades that have been given me. I just did my job.'
Monkeyboysdontknow 6 months ago
Oh god could you ever see the look of guilt in his face!
Mycterizian 6 months ago
Are you kidding me? You are a waste of bandwidth "Apolloreality". Damn, people can waste some time.
GunnMetalGrey 6 months ago
2001 a space odysee was filmed three years before this bullshit hoax was perpetrated .. the lem could hold te crew in space suitd their wanst enough physical space and Armstrong is a lying sack of shit !
pinemontgo 7 months ago
@pinemontgo That's why he basically went into hiding......some people just aren't comfortable telling lies on a regular basis !!
jhhwingnut 7 months ago
@pinemontgo
'Armstrong is a lying'
Nope. Finish first grade english, then spend 12 years studying science, and you MIGHT be able to understand the fact that we did go to the Moon. In the meantime calling Mr. Armstrong, who is a good, honest and courageous man, anything else is really just an ugly blemish on YOUR character.
Monkeyboysdontknow 6 months ago
They can't hardly make eye contact with anyone.....they're living a terrible lie...!!!
jhhwingnut 7 months ago
@jhhwingnut
WTF do you expect them to stare into the camera dumbass?
You people make up the silliest shit and claim it's "proof".
Proof that you're an asshole.
Blahblobify 7 months ago
@Blahblobify I think you have proven yourself the asshole much better than I did....lol...!!!
jhhwingnut 7 months ago
@Blahblobify peee yuuuu......your face smells just like an asshole.....looks just like an asshole....your wife says your an asshole......must be true....and NASA would probably swear to it......."asshole"...lol...!!!
jhhwingnut 7 months ago
@jhhwingnut
I love it when you silly children are back in the school yard. Come back when your mummy finds your dummy.
TheSpiritof1969 7 months ago
@TheSpiritof1969 Wow...you are a strange one.....
jhhwingnut 7 months ago
Maybe he's just depressed because he had just had a humbling experience and knew he had returned to the kind of planet that contained people who would, 50 years later, be denying it even happened. I suspect travelling to another world gives you some perspective on Humanity.
To quote Neil himself, "I held up my thumb and it blotted out the Earth, I didn't feel big, I felt very, very small".
SuperOfficerDibble 7 months ago
@SuperOfficerDibble Keep telling yourself that, the grass on you plot is tasty huh. Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.wake up man
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
@jonescool1fly
Sure, because slipping into infantile behaviour is absolute proof that you are right...
It's stupidity like yours that helps to undermine any authenticity that ever belonged to those who have concerns about the reality of the Moon landing, so thanks for that, you prop up those you oppose by making yourself look like a 6-year old.
SuperOfficerDibble 7 months ago
@SuperOfficerDibble
But surely, most of the hoaxies have the mental age of a six year old? Did you ever come across one that did anything except childish name calling? I'll bet not.
TheSpiritof1969 7 months ago
its a very very sad and depressing video of a Man whos a hero to just went to the Moon.... to then wathc all 3 ARMSTRONG GUILT VIDEOS IT THEN BECOME VERY CLEAR, SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG, hMM bUZZ BECAME AN ALCOHOLIC AFTER HIS RETURN WTF.... heros that wen to the Moon act like that..... Hmmmmm
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
The biteing of his lip (indicates he wants to say something), then looking down says, I cant I tell the truth and it hurts so very bad, then his straight mouth tells, us hes just going to have to except the lie for the betterment of America, then at very last the self ressureing smile, he tells himself its going to ok, I can do thiS. Just watch the video about 5- 10 times its very easy to see.
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
I do not see a tired /exhausted man, I see a man in a mental tortured state, realizeing he is protected the Country he loves, but is wearing the lies on his shirt, those emotions are of extreme, sadness and of a man desperately want to say the truth.....
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
No his Body launguage says" wow here I sit haveing my concious EAT ME ALIVE because I have to lie to Amercia/Russians to make it seem that we are most advanced leading into the cold war, when in Fact they never went to the moon, and everytapers video he says cryptic, phrases, never once being proud in a real way to make you believe ( not swearing on a bible)?????? Now thats just weird as well. Complie all the evidence and NO MOON LANDING, believe it happened =SHEEP.
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
Who was waffling?
CokeSupply 7 months ago
This man's body language is that of someone who is both extremely tired and extremely relieved. What else am I supposed to make of it?
ApolloWasReal 7 months ago
Hes been forced to lie and cover-up the truth.. The radiation belt thats exsists beyond our planet FRIED THE CHIMPANZEEE they sent up before hand, that is why its all lies, no civilaszation has ever been to the moon.
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
@jonescool1fly Wow, you really need help man. There is no "radiation belt". Also, no chimp ever got high enough to reach the MAGNETIC FIELD. Please go back to 6th grade and learn some science. Some spelling lessons wouldn't hurt either.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
Body language says EVERYTHING.
jonescool1fly 7 months ago
@jonescool1fly Really? Everything? I had no idea.
ApolloWasReal 7 months ago
This was the sixtie when celebrities were hollywood film stars not test pilots,Leave the man alone.
arobekie 7 months ago
Let me get this straight. A few seconds of a tired but smiling Neil Armstrong, just back from the very first landing on the moon, means....what, exactly?
ApolloWasReal 8 months ago
@ApolloWasReal Another pretender throwing some hoax conspiracy bullshit on the wall to see how much of it will stick, trying to see how many idiots he/she can get to say, "Ooooooo, did you see that? He has guilt written all over his face!"
Either that or the feds are secretly making videos like this to see how people respond, so as to make sure that NONE of the ones who buy into this crap EVER end up getting a jury summons.
(Maybe it IS guilt. He might have just cut one.)
Astrobrant2 7 months ago
@Astrobrant2 Hey, that's actually not a bad idea. If I ever have to pick a jury, I'll be sure to exclude anyone who thinks Apollo was faked. It'd be conclusive proof of an inability to think clearly.
ApolloWasReal 7 months ago
This is newb stupidity.
SpeakerForBoskone 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Let's launch 3000 tons straight up, 13 times without loss, but we'll fake the part where we land 14 tons in1/6thG on the moon....because that's way harder than the launch.
We should also fake the landings on the Earth faciing side, so that when optical technology evolves to the point where people can see we didn't land, we can make asses out of all the Apollo teams and their familes...and the entire country as a bonus
Apollo deniers. Proof you can train vegetables to speak.
timpovikings 10 months ago
No "guilt" visible on his face at all in this video.
normbreyfogle 10 months ago
@normbreyfogle He seemed guilty to me! But it's well known that it is hard to judge someone's emotions via their facial features unless you really know them well personally - and even then, it can still be hard to tell - its all to do with psychology and how we required the ability to hide our thoughts and emotions during evolution
CokeSupply 7 months ago
@CokeSupply You say he seemed guilty to you (with an exclamation point) and then waffle about it being difficult to tell. Since you don't know the man, have no idea what was being said or done at the time, I think it would be safe to say it's IMPOSSIBLE to tell anything.
What I know about Armstrong is that he has always had shy mannerisms. What more do you make out of it?
And even if it WAS guilt, guilt of what? "C'mon Neil, you peed on the mailbox at the party last night, didn't you?"
Astrobrant2 7 months ago
NEVER underestimate an IDIOT!!!!
I've heard some stupid shit on here, but holy fuck!
I REALLY, REALLY hope you don't actually believe the BS you spew!
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT12, long hall flights, like that to Mars will need a "Hardened" room for the crew to seek shelter during Solar Flares. All spaceflight involved increased exposure to radiation, healthy people, good diet and in some cases medication will overcome most of it.
The Apollo crews were the first to see flashes of light while they had their eye's closed, which they found rather disturbing, these are small radiation particles interacting with the gell in the eyeball, causing a flick of light.
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT11, Because space is free of air molecules, you can travel as fast as you like, with no friction or surface heating (the Concord grows several inches in lengh at mach 2, due to skin friction heating from air) you can travel at 30,000kmh in space, be the shape of a brick, have walls a few times thicker then paper and not have a problem if there wern't any Solar Flares, Micro Meteorites or space junk, so we build the outside like a bullet proof vest, balistic ceramics, kevlar mesh.
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
@1BustedMyth There are actually more clever ways to deal with micrometeorites. Rather than rely on a thick and heavy layer of a strong material like kevlar, make two relatively thin layers with space between them. When a hypervelocity particle hits the outer layer, it fragments into much smaller pieces that spray out in the empty space so when they hit the inner layer they're more likely to be stopped. This is the widely used "Whipple shield", and it can also provide thermal insulation.
ApolloWasReal 8 months ago
@ApolloWasReal, Thanks appreciate the comment, I've seen the shield but didn't know what it was called. I've dealt a little with balistics and its great to see this kind of lateral thinking. Bullet proof vest for a spacecraft! ;) all the best
1BustedMyth 8 months ago
@1BustedMyth It's called a Whipple Shield after Fred Whipple, the American astronomer who invented it.
ApolloWasReal 8 months ago
PT10, All this equipement has been made to be as light and strong as it possibly can because there is no way we could otherwise launch it. It only has to last for one use, so its built to do the job but be disposable. The Ascent stage was crumpled when the rocket fired, but not enough to be a problem, the pressure inside and the vacuum outside helped it keep its shape, to get it light enough with all the systems, it was virtually a metal balloon around 0.020 inch thick in parts
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT9, As they get closer, they slow their rate of decent, start looking for the landing site, if the saite is clear, they commit and land, the motor on the lander was the very first rocket with a throttle ever built. Meal, sleep, EVA suites on, out to do science. Surface time few hours to few days, When done the Commander presses the launch button, the craft splits in two, the lower section stays on the Moon, the motor in the top half fires and they go back to dock with the Command module.
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT8, When ready, two crew climb into the lander, close the hatch, undock from the Command Module, leaving the third to stay in orbit. They extend the landing gear and get the CM to check, commit to decent by firing motor in the opposite direction to wash off orbit speed, start the decent, they lock the Rendezvous Radar onto the CM that feeds the flight computer, so they can reacquire it on their way back, they lock the landing radar onto the Moon surface some +-70km below,
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT7, Apollo flights would carry out checks on systems at that height, seperate the craft, dock with and extract the Lunar Lander, have a meal a sleep, then the next day, all being well, they are given the go for TLI: trans Lunar Injection, they leave Earth orbit and start on the 3'1/2 day trip to the Moon some 300,000km away, on arival they go into orbit around the moon, have a meal, sleep, next power up the Lander, text the systems, especially the two Radar systems for landind and docking.
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT6, On lauch you use vast amounts of fuel, travel faster then a bullet, high G loading, at around 150,000ft you turn further east into a paralet to Earth path and continue to accelerate to around 24,000kph, this is Orbital Speed, you can then shut the engines down, due to no atmosphere you will keep that speed, just need to top it up every 24hrs with a quick burn, your altitude is around 250km, The Shuttle will stay there or continue up to 500km to dock with the International Space Station.
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT5, Spacecraft are a whole different ball game! the launch phase is a pain in the arse because it requires huge amounts of fuel for a tiny spacecraft, hugely expensive, noisy and expensive , this is the very reason we are looking feverishly at other options that do not use rockets or at least not frrom the surface, like high altitude ballon launch, Space Elevator and launching from a high altitude mothership aircraft eg: White Knight Space Ship1 system from scaled compsites
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT4, Rip one wing off, turn it the other way, mount both at the root on a rotating shaft connected to a motor and you have a Rotary Wing Aircraft, the formal name for a Helicopter, it prodused lift in one spot and can go straight up. Most people think they fall out of the sky if the engine stops, but they have a glide ability just like a plane, called Autorotation and if mangaged well you can put the aircraft down in very tight spots with no damage.
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT3, As soon as your outside an atmosphere then design charactoristics change completely! Aircraft "Fly" using Wings and the principle we call the Aerofoil Section, that produces lift by creating a low pressure above the wing, the wing is then sucked up into it, wing goes up, the engine is only there to push the wing through the air and produce this effect, thats how Hang gliders can work without and engine and planes don't fall out of the sky when their engine stops: they glide.
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
PT2, Space and the Moon have no atmosphere, there is almost nothing at all. Earth has a very dense collection of gas wrapped around it, its standard pressure is 1013mb and reduces as you climb +-4% for every 1000ft. Its this thick gas that A: allows us to fly, B; Dictates how we must design an aircraft (least resistance) and as we accelerate through the sound barrier these gas molecules get compressed on the nose of the aircraft, when the nose pushes through, we get a Sonic Boom.
1BustedMyth 10 months ago
so what is this meant to show?
amor987654321 10 months ago <