@AlienZygote010 thankfully god is not so childish that he turns his back on people just because they can't say his name properly. JW's as a whole get out and talk to people about the bible. I've had them come to my door several times over the yrs. Who else does what jesus said to do with that kind of love and zeal?(matt 28:19) As far as the sabbath. The law code was fulfilled with jesus ransom. Enough said.
When a JW comes to my door and knocks on and it announces what he is, he looses me as soon as he mispronounces "Yah-hova". And the fact that he knocked on my door during the true shabbat, to invite me to his church on a false pagan shabbat did not help either.
This is an awesome video, for sure. The tablets inside the Ark of the Covenant are written in modern Hebrew, though, and in very part-form for the most part, a la 'My Book of Bible Stories' (grew up with that book).
Everything is groovy until we see inside the Ark of the Covenant, dude! (I know I'm being petty, but the little scholar in me crieth out!)
The Ten Commandments are always shown in movies like Cecil B. DeMille's one as being written in a paleo-Hebrew or Canaanite script that dates to near 1000 BCE at best. Moses lived 500 years earlier! This is only because more ancient scripts aren't so well-known, but something like Proto-Sinaitic probably approaches the script used at Moses' time.
@Bimfirestarter You talk like you wrote history, yet the evidence speaks for itself, if JW's are so bad why is the earth filling up with them, and why is everything breaking down, and who really created man ????, need i go on there are possibly hundreds of questions needing answered?.
@Brighteyes1ful I'm not sure what exactly you mean, here, but I am intrigued and wasn't intending to offend anyone. Could you say more specifically what your problem with what I said was?
Doesn't the Bible say to 'call on his name', 'praise his name', 'declare his name'?
Didn't people greet eachother using his name? Well, sure they did! The Lachish Ostracon are 600 BCE inscriptions that show (besides the Tanakh itself) that Jehovah's name was commonly used by the Israelites. Besides, names like Eliyahu and Yehoshaphat and a mysriad others show they didn't hesistate to pronounce it....is that not true?
Ok some questions it appeared that the whole of the inside was covered in gold? Is that in the bible? Because that would be a vast amount of gold to cover all the walls in it? And is the hight of the front of the temple, is that according to the bible, because a free standing wall that high, in an earth quack prone area, let alone how they would even get it that high with the materials of that time, such as no concrete, until the Romans were around, how would they make it that high?
@ASexyChef Solomon was a dang-good builder. The ancients were able to do quite a lot, back then. The Bible says how much gold Solomon acquired in a year (forget the exact amount), and it was quite a huge amount, so much that some call it in2 question, but compared with some records of the Pharaohs and Alexander the Great, it's not so unbelievable.
For those who think they know it all, this temple is not going to be rebuilt but is a temple from the past, through reading the bible this is to show you how detailed the account was to recreate the temple in 3D model.
For those who think they know it all, this temple is not going to be rebuilt but is a temple from the past, through reading the bible this is to show you how detailed the account was to recreate the temple in 3D model.
Haha I like how the portrayal of this temple is very materialistic. I think it's a direct illustration of man's greed and portrayal of heaven from the ones who have written the bible. Quite obvious.
The problem is, whatever we think about this temple or the people who built it 3000 years back, there's little doubt among scholars and archaeologists that it existed.
@Bimfirestarter Yes it's quite simple isn't it. Man made that temple 3000 years ago. People. Not god. When you stop and think about it, it's a slap in the face really. When you think of it as man creating god in his image, it makes more sense doesn't it?
@evilnomad111 How is it a slap in the face? King David wanted to build this temple to honour his God, but he was told his son would build it, and build it he did, and God was pleased with the effort put in2 it. -Unless you don't accept that part. I mean, you can pick and choose, but when ya do that, you more seem to be revising history so it suits your ideas, instead of aligning ideas to reality.
A slap in the face as in "obviousness." I'm sorry but the earth being created in 7 days 5000 years ago or woman coming from the rib cage of man isn't reality. Furthermore, reading a book that says god was pleased doesn't prove an existence of a god or any god for that matter. You are relating to a book that condones slavery, genocide, the stoning of non virgins on their wedding night, the submission of women, ect.
If a "loving" god would permit this, or need materialistic means to be "pleased," then that really isn't divine, but a man made ideology. Sorry, it's not suiting my ideas, it's just trying to fabricate it's own and YOU bought into this stuff.
@evilnomad111 If someone permits another to make them a gift out of appreciation, how is this bad? -Or even abnormal? That's all this is. Don't be sorry that it doesn't suit your ideas! (aheheh). Cheer up! Where is it said that God 'needed' it 2 be pleased? You're inserting tese misconceptions, dude, reading them in. Anyways, history's history. That's all I was originally arguing for, but of course, arguing on youtube is quite pointless, isn't it?
Well of course the biblical god needed to be pleased. They were doing this since kane and abel in the bible. My point is if god did exist and primitive and imperfect people did do that for him, he would be above that sort of thing. This makes it obvious that the whole concept of god is man made. There is no misconception.
And whats so ignorant about my opinion? I don't think it takes a lack of education in order to read the bible and understand that the god character wiped out entire civilizations because they diddn't believe in what he did. Luckily it's all biblical mythology.
@evilnomad111 You sound like you do not understand the bible, oh wait you don't. God, destroyed people in biblical times because they were wicked and refused to change. He had his prophets and disciples declaring his judicial commands. They chose death. You also still stand ignorant.
Haha yet again another theist who can justify the slaughter of men, women, and children based on an account of "wickedness." That is why, ArtOfDale, the bible is a gruesome book. I don't care if it was a man or a god telling me to put women and children to the sword based on an empty distinction, I'd tell them no. THATS true understanding. With the cognitive functions you exhibit, you should be locked up.
And if you were wondering, all of the behavior exhibited by the jehovah character isn't one of a loving benevolant god, but that of a psychopath. If you cannot understand that, then I fear the worst.
amazing temple structure and all....but i think it will be highly unlikley to go ahead especially when you have 1.5 billion muslims around.....dont think the 300million arabs on the door steps of israel will sit their idly while that takes place
@Italblessings -By 'JW's I suppose you mean those damned 'J-walkers', yes? I totally agree with you! They have just got to go! They can get someone killed, for crying out loud! -And what about 'Squeegies', huh? We gotta do something about this. We have to take back the streets from these crazies!
I appreciated this video and the effort in making it.
A statement such as "not accurate" is not very helpful. If you have any doubts abou the accuracy of a statement, measurement or suchlike it is usually good (and fair) practice to give the details ANd references. WIKIPedia requires this kind of reference and you should be expected to back up your statement.
from Watchtower, 07 aug. 1 The visionary temple provided the Jewish exiles with a promise that pure worship would be restored and that each Jewish family would have an inheritance in the land. 43:2-4, 7, 9—What were "the carcasses of their kings" that had to be removed from the temple? The carcasses evidently referred to idols. Jerusalem's rulers and her people had polluted God's temple with idols—in effect, making them their kings.
It's just Jehovah witness are so uptight and have so many rules and for the last 2yrs I haven't ran into a Jehovah witness on you tube unless they are hiding.
Well, you maybe right in 1 way that JWs have a lot of restrictions that may seem like were uptight. But trust me no ones forced, whatever they do or are voluntary. If anyone doesnt want a part of it, they are more than free to go.
And another thing is, sometimes they would comment on youtube like I am doing right now. But if I feel like this discussion is getting into an argument or fight, then we would just leave. (which may seem like were hiding, but were merely trying to live peacefully)
Why don't you look at the authors profile. He's a logistics manager. I would say he's able to use the computer better than most. Great job with this video by the way rtm369- its my favorite video on youtube.
Thanks oneworldkingdom, I wish I could take credit but sadly I did not create this video, I am merely sharing this video which someone else mailed to me from the Philippines. I wish I knew its real author though; for sure hes some genius to go through the bible into detail and prepare this so that we can get a glimpse of what it might have looked like.
This might help answer your question in fuller detail: Watchtower 07, Aug. 18th, Highlights for the Book of Ezekiel. Ezekiel 40:3--47:12—What is represented by the visionary temple? This temple of gigantic proportions seen by Ezekiel in vision was actually never built. It pictured God's spiritual temple—his templelike arrangement for pure worship in our day. (Ezekiel 40:2; Micah 4:1; Hebrews 8:2; 9:23, 24)
Ezekiel 43:7 And he said unto me, Son of man, the place of my throne, and the place of the soles of my feet, WHERE I WILL DWELL in the midst of the children of Israel FOR EVER, and my holy name, shall the house of Israel no more defile, [neither] they, nor their kings, by their whoredom, nor by the carcases of their kings in their high places.
:'( This made me cry... Then I laughed! :D
IamNemoN01 1 week ago in playlist Theocratic Videos
@AlienZygote010 thankfully god is not so childish that he turns his back on people just because they can't say his name properly. JW's as a whole get out and talk to people about the bible. I've had them come to my door several times over the yrs. Who else does what jesus said to do with that kind of love and zeal?(matt 28:19) As far as the sabbath. The law code was fulfilled with jesus ransom. Enough said.
itsjustnopinionok 2 weeks ago
there was only one menorah and table of bread but this is a really nice animation!
NatapixAS 2 months ago
There was a pot of manna and Aaron's staff that budded also in the ark.
ragslick 3 months ago
3;41 into the video it shows the ark---Zechariah says it won,t be there or even thought of.
24thchance 8 months ago
its nice but some components are very inaccurate.
sashi128 1 year ago
When a JW comes to my door and knocks on and it announces what he is, he looses me as soon as he mispronounces "Yah-hova". And the fact that he knocked on my door during the true shabbat, to invite me to his church on a false pagan shabbat did not help either.
AlienZygote010 1 year ago
very nicely done
thevenusstarlite 1 year ago
3:49 --- 4:04
Don't look, Marion! Whatever you do, don't open your eyes!
ABookwormAndProud 1 year ago
Comment removed
ABookwormAndProud 1 year ago
great video
saraa49 1 year ago
Nice job whoever made this! looks like the depiction in NWT Ref. Bible p.5591-94.
A pic is worth a 1000 words.
definately 2 thumbs up. Thanks for bothering to post in youtube. We benefitted in facebook.
jolenefaithweiss 1 year ago
temple of salomon not jehovah
dakosee 1 year ago
@dakosee YHWH, aka temple of Jehovah.
ArtOfDale 1 year ago
This is an awesome video, for sure. The tablets inside the Ark of the Covenant are written in modern Hebrew, though, and in very part-form for the most part, a la 'My Book of Bible Stories' (grew up with that book).
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
Everything is groovy until we see inside the Ark of the Covenant, dude! (I know I'm being petty, but the little scholar in me crieth out!)
The Ten Commandments are always shown in movies like Cecil B. DeMille's one as being written in a paleo-Hebrew or Canaanite script that dates to near 1000 BCE at best. Moses lived 500 years earlier! This is only because more ancient scripts aren't so well-known, but something like Proto-Sinaitic probably approaches the script used at Moses' time.
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
@Bimfirestarter You talk like you wrote history, yet the evidence speaks for itself, if JW's are so bad why is the earth filling up with them, and why is everything breaking down, and who really created man ????, need i go on there are possibly hundreds of questions needing answered?.
Brighteyes1ful 1 year ago
@Brighteyes1ful I'm not sure what exactly you mean, here, but I am intrigued and wasn't intending to offend anyone. Could you say more specifically what your problem with what I said was?
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
you arnt supposed to say his name.
thenotoriousadin 1 year ago
@thenotoriousadin Who, me?
Doesn't the Bible say to 'call on his name', 'praise his name', 'declare his name'?
Didn't people greet eachother using his name? Well, sure they did! The Lachish Ostracon are 600 BCE inscriptions that show (besides the Tanakh itself) that Jehovah's name was commonly used by the Israelites. Besides, names like Eliyahu and Yehoshaphat and a mysriad others show they didn't hesistate to pronounce it....is that not true?
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
Ok some questions it appeared that the whole of the inside was covered in gold? Is that in the bible? Because that would be a vast amount of gold to cover all the walls in it? And is the hight of the front of the temple, is that according to the bible, because a free standing wall that high, in an earth quack prone area, let alone how they would even get it that high with the materials of that time, such as no concrete, until the Romans were around, how would they make it that high?
ASexyChef 1 year ago
@ASexyChef Solomon was a dang-good builder. The ancients were able to do quite a lot, back then. The Bible says how much gold Solomon acquired in a year (forget the exact amount), and it was quite a huge amount, so much that some call it in2 question, but compared with some records of the Pharaohs and Alexander the Great, it's not so unbelievable.
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
For those who think they know it all, this temple is not going to be rebuilt but is a temple from the past, through reading the bible this is to show you how detailed the account was to recreate the temple in 3D model.
medsailing 2 years ago
For those who think they know it all, this temple is not going to be rebuilt but is a temple from the past, through reading the bible this is to show you how detailed the account was to recreate the temple in 3D model.
medsailing 2 years ago
Haha I like how the portrayal of this temple is very materialistic. I think it's a direct illustration of man's greed and portrayal of heaven from the ones who have written the bible. Quite obvious.
evilnomad111 2 years ago
@evilnomad111 Oh, snaap!
The problem is, whatever we think about this temple or the people who built it 3000 years back, there's little doubt among scholars and archaeologists that it existed.
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
@Bimfirestarter Yes it's quite simple isn't it. Man made that temple 3000 years ago. People. Not god. When you stop and think about it, it's a slap in the face really. When you think of it as man creating god in his image, it makes more sense doesn't it?
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@evilnomad111 How is it a slap in the face? King David wanted to build this temple to honour his God, but he was told his son would build it, and build it he did, and God was pleased with the effort put in2 it. -Unless you don't accept that part. I mean, you can pick and choose, but when ya do that, you more seem to be revising history so it suits your ideas, instead of aligning ideas to reality.
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
@Bimfirestarter
A slap in the face as in "obviousness." I'm sorry but the earth being created in 7 days 5000 years ago or woman coming from the rib cage of man isn't reality. Furthermore, reading a book that says god was pleased doesn't prove an existence of a god or any god for that matter. You are relating to a book that condones slavery, genocide, the stoning of non virgins on their wedding night, the submission of women, ect.
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@Bimfirestarter
If a "loving" god would permit this, or need materialistic means to be "pleased," then that really isn't divine, but a man made ideology. Sorry, it's not suiting my ideas, it's just trying to fabricate it's own and YOU bought into this stuff.
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@evilnomad111 If someone permits another to make them a gift out of appreciation, how is this bad? -Or even abnormal? That's all this is. Don't be sorry that it doesn't suit your ideas! (aheheh). Cheer up! Where is it said that God 'needed' it 2 be pleased? You're inserting tese misconceptions, dude, reading them in. Anyways, history's history. That's all I was originally arguing for, but of course, arguing on youtube is quite pointless, isn't it?
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
@Bimfirestarter
Well of course the biblical god needed to be pleased. They were doing this since kane and abel in the bible. My point is if god did exist and primitive and imperfect people did do that for him, he would be above that sort of thing. This makes it obvious that the whole concept of god is man made. There is no misconception.
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@evilnomad111 You make no sense at all.
ArtOfDale 1 year ago
@ArtOfDale
Sorry if I don't make any sense to you.
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@evilnomad111 No its not to me, your opinion is just ignorant.
ArtOfDale 1 year ago
@ArtOfDale
And whats so ignorant about my opinion? I don't think it takes a lack of education in order to read the bible and understand that the god character wiped out entire civilizations because they diddn't believe in what he did. Luckily it's all biblical mythology.
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@evilnomad111 You sound like you do not understand the bible, oh wait you don't. God, destroyed people in biblical times because they were wicked and refused to change. He had his prophets and disciples declaring his judicial commands. They chose death. You also still stand ignorant.
ArtOfDale 1 year ago
@ArtOfDale
Haha yet again another theist who can justify the slaughter of men, women, and children based on an account of "wickedness." That is why, ArtOfDale, the bible is a gruesome book. I don't care if it was a man or a god telling me to put women and children to the sword based on an empty distinction, I'd tell them no. THATS true understanding. With the cognitive functions you exhibit, you should be locked up.
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@ArtOfDale
And if you were wondering, all of the behavior exhibited by the jehovah character isn't one of a loving benevolant god, but that of a psychopath. If you cannot understand that, then I fear the worst.
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@ArtOfDale
Oh and lastly you DO understand what I said, it just offended you emotionally because you developed a sense of identification with your belief.
evilnomad111 1 year ago
@evilnomad111 No your comment made no sense at all, it seems you have issues as well from the claim you've stated... seek help.
ArtOfDale 1 year ago
amazing temple structure and all....but i think it will be highly unlikley to go ahead especially when you have 1.5 billion muslims around.....dont think the 300million arabs on the door steps of israel will sit their idly while that takes place
Dangermouse6340 2 years ago
God bless all JW on the earth
dolphinamigo 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
Italblessings 2 years ago
@Italblessings -By 'JW's I suppose you mean those damned 'J-walkers', yes? I totally agree with you! They have just got to go! They can get someone killed, for crying out loud! -And what about 'Squeegies', huh? We gotta do something about this. We have to take back the streets from these crazies!
Bimfirestarter 1 year ago
this is from the bible program ilumana
gracefamilyfellowshi 2 years ago
House of YHWH
GanEdenAustralia 2 years ago
nice but not accurate
gregkm 2 years ago
I appreciated this video and the effort in making it.
A statement such as "not accurate" is not very helpful. If you have any doubts abou the accuracy of a statement, measurement or suchlike it is usually good (and fair) practice to give the details ANd references. WIKIPedia requires this kind of reference and you should be expected to back up your statement.
So, can we expect some details soon?
kevinandhelena 2 years ago
cough- HEATHEN LIES -cough
hellmelon666 2 years ago
ow shut up! this is accurate!
Kaidranzer100 2 years ago
cough-heathen lies - cough
hellmelon666 2 years ago
Excellent Job. This is my favorite video on Youtube. Amazing job.
oneworldkingdom 2 years ago 2
wow, amazing!
Klaheto 3 years ago
zat music reminds me my soviet childhood--"simphony of the communism builders".----
straight to the paradise!
nrouslan 3 years ago
EZEKIEL?
jesusmonde 3 years ago
Ezekiel 38:16 God is speaking to people in the end times who rise up against
Israel. God is speaking of a confrontation that will take place in His land. You
will come up against My people IsraelI will bring you against My land, so that
the nations may know Me, when I am hallowed in you
LaPrincessYasmin81 3 years ago
Great song.
citycale 3 years ago
great job my brother!! see you in paradise :)
sayanssj4 3 years ago 5
Amazing and beautiful video. Thank you for posting it.
jiji45 3 years ago 9
from Watchtower, 07 aug. 1 The visionary temple provided the Jewish exiles with a promise that pure worship would be restored and that each Jewish family would have an inheritance in the land. 43:2-4, 7, 9—What were "the carcasses of their kings" that had to be removed from the temple? The carcasses evidently referred to idols. Jerusalem's rulers and her people had polluted God's temple with idols—in effect, making them their kings.
vammann 3 years ago
wow you are a Jehovah witness. Can Jehovah witness even use computers?
skatahman 3 years ago
What an odd question.. Im surprised you didnt know that Skatahman... which part of civilization are you from?
rtm369 3 years ago
It's just Jehovah witness are so uptight and have so many rules and for the last 2yrs I haven't ran into a Jehovah witness on you tube unless they are hiding.
skatahman 3 years ago
Well, you maybe right in 1 way that JWs have a lot of restrictions that may seem like were uptight. But trust me no ones forced, whatever they do or are voluntary. If anyone doesnt want a part of it, they are more than free to go.
And another thing is, sometimes they would comment on youtube like I am doing right now. But if I feel like this discussion is getting into an argument or fight, then we would just leave. (which may seem like were hiding, but were merely trying to live peacefully)
rtm369 3 years ago
? Maybe you should read the authors profile. He's in Logistics. I would say he's able to use computers better than most.
oneworldkingdom 2 years ago
Why don't you look at the authors profile. He's a logistics manager. I would say he's able to use the computer better than most. Great job with this video by the way rtm369- its my favorite video on youtube.
oneworldkingdom 2 years ago
Thanks oneworldkingdom, I wish I could take credit but sadly I did not create this video, I am merely sharing this video which someone else mailed to me from the Philippines. I wish I knew its real author though; for sure hes some genius to go through the bible into detail and prepare this so that we can get a glimpse of what it might have looked like.
rtm369 2 years ago
what is the name of the music?
EUguitarRULE 2 years ago
This might help answer your question in fuller detail: Watchtower 07, Aug. 18th, Highlights for the Book of Ezekiel. Ezekiel 40:3--47:12—What is represented by the visionary temple? This temple of gigantic proportions seen by Ezekiel in vision was actually never built. It pictured God's spiritual temple—his templelike arrangement for pure worship in our day. (Ezekiel 40:2; Micah 4:1; Hebrews 8:2; 9:23, 24)
vammann 3 years ago 2
Is that this temple?
Ezekiel 43:7 And he said unto me, Son of man, the place of my throne, and the place of the soles of my feet, WHERE I WILL DWELL in the midst of the children of Israel FOR EVER, and my holy name, shall the house of Israel no more defile, [neither] they, nor their kings, by their whoredom, nor by the carcases of their kings in their high places.
PeteWaldo 3 years ago
No. The temple in Ezekiel is a spiritual temple. The temple in Solomon's day was literal.
vammann 3 years ago 8
beatiful, tanks my good jehova!
youmoraes 4 years ago 3