@accountbypass1 Hitchens would have been great to see here. His style of talking and debating make him better then Dawkins, I think. However, Dawkins writes better, so it evens out
Paula Zahn comes off to me like she really hates atheists and is using her position to take stabs at them and promote hate rather then a true dialog and discourse.
Dawkins had a great answer to Zahns last question in the 1st segment... I know so many that dont have fun, indulge in their desires (and miss out on the oppotunity to fully enjoy their life) due to a fear instilled in them (with no option to choose otherwise) passed down to them by there parents.
you can picture a jesus freak as LINUS from the comic strip peanuts...LINUS is the jesus freak and his SECURITY BLANKET is his religion.... LINUS NEEDS THAT BLANKET FOR SECURITY JUST TO GET THROUGH THE DAY
Thank you Richard! Aethiest arent trying to impose anything, we are just trying to live freely with our beliefs just as those who are religious do. Unfortunately those who are not ai\ethiest are the ones who try to impose there religioun on us. If you dont believe me, try to go to a bar on sunday.....thank you.
Actually he's a good scientist but a total asshole. What does he care about religion if he is in science. He just wants little creeps to worship him make a ton of money lecturing about his betters and brainwashing kids. What an evil greasespot.
He doesn't want anyone to worship him. He isn't brainwashing kids either. You clearly don't understand what atheism really is. (And you call atheists intolerant)
Yeah...i find it hilarious that she is patronizing an oxford professor...someone that probably had a higher IQ than she does (now) when he was four years old.
It seems like she gave him nothing but soft questions, and didn't question any of his responces. I think they got so much bad attention from the first segment they didn't want to semm anti-atheist at all. The interview felt like appeasment instead of doing the topic justice by having Dawkins address the apaling statements made by the pannel.
religious america makes me horny.
halflifeproductionz 1 year ago
Good work Richard.
bleedy13 1 year ago
I would have prefered Hitchens to be on that panel. He would rip a new hole in Zahn.
accountbypass1 2 years ago 3
@accountbypass1 Hitchens would have been great to see here. His style of talking and debating make him better then Dawkins, I think. However, Dawkins writes better, so it evens out
ProudAtheistIndiana 1 year ago
Paula Zahn comes off to me like she really hates atheists and is using her position to take stabs at them and promote hate rather then a true dialog and discourse.
Elizaw00 2 years ago 3
Man, I wish Dawkins was on the last segment. He would not have tolerated any of that buggery.
SidOfOdin 2 years ago 10
Dawkins had a great answer to Zahns last question in the 1st segment... I know so many that dont have fun, indulge in their desires (and miss out on the oppotunity to fully enjoy their life) due to a fear instilled in them (with no option to choose otherwise) passed down to them by there parents.
ntelekt1 3 years ago 2
you can picture a jesus freak as LINUS from the comic strip peanuts...LINUS is the jesus freak and his SECURITY BLANKET is his religion.... LINUS NEEDS THAT BLANKET FOR SECURITY JUST TO GET THROUGH THE DAY
F4O4U4R4S 4 years ago
Do you think that the crutch argument is original? Yes,you do.
prrolg 4 years ago
Thank you Richard! Aethiest arent trying to impose anything, we are just trying to live freely with our beliefs just as those who are religious do. Unfortunately those who are not ai\ethiest are the ones who try to impose there religioun on us. If you dont believe me, try to go to a bar on sunday.....thank you.
SaudiPimp 4 years ago 3
RAmen
bktennis2006 4 years ago 5
Richard Dawkins is awesome
sinner013 4 years ago 2
I love it every time he says "Thor". Atheists with English accents are the best.
dantestorment 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Without the accent he's an idiot. Christopher Hitchens too.
lrgpp 4 years ago
Irgpp:
Wow, good argument :p
human8080 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
human8080=spiritless
prrolg 4 years ago
prrolg=judgmental without basis.
human8080 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
human8080=conclusion without process.
prrolg 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually he's a good scientist but a total asshole. What does he care about religion if he is in science. He just wants little creeps to worship him make a ton of money lecturing about his betters and brainwashing kids. What an evil greasespot.
prrolg 4 years ago
He doesn't want anyone to worship him. He isn't brainwashing kids either. You clearly don't understand what atheism really is. (And you call atheists intolerant)
bktennis2006 4 years ago 13
Atheist Pride Parade anyone?
The Million Non-believer March?
I think it's time.
sciencedoggy 4 years ago
Paula Zahn sounds a bit patronising.
RoDJ99 4 years ago
Yeah...i find it hilarious that she is patronizing an oxford professor...someone that probably had a higher IQ than she does (now) when he was four years old.
PheenixTears420 4 years ago
lol, agreed. Awesome.
DblOSmith 4 years ago
It seems like she gave him nothing but soft questions, and didn't question any of his responces. I think they got so much bad attention from the first segment they didn't want to semm anti-atheist at all. The interview felt like appeasment instead of doing the topic justice by having Dawkins address the apaling statements made by the pannel.
MrX420 4 years ago
Charles dawkins is my hero
sec2 5 years ago
I think you mean Richard Dawkins. Yeah, he's great.
LeeWood 5 years ago 2
LMAO.
I agree, the man is a good representative of my beliefs, so it is as well that he earns my adoration.
PedanticNo1 4 years ago
Yes he is. We love you too, LeeWood.
DblOSmith 4 years ago
LOL You're right, I just got off a Darwin vid when I posted that.
sec2 4 years ago