Added: 3 years ago
From: loftleidir001
Views: 8,840
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • No despego de la 33L, sino de la 36R (es más nadie despega desde la 33) y tampoco aguantó tanto en el aire, fue algo rápido no subió más de 33ft

  • Good reconstruction. I remember reading somewhere that one of the passengers on board that doomed flight shouted "Its eating up the runway!"

    R.I.P to the ones who perished. =.(

  • Comment removed

  • well done!! excellent reconstruction

  • im sorry but your music sucks ass and you made a pretty good reconstruction

  • The aircraft didn't climb as high as you had indicated in the video.

    It was barely a few feet off the runway before it stalled in a nose high atitude.

  • well I am from Iceland and in the news we were told that the plane climbed and then the enginge did somthing and the plane stalled

  • It attempted to climb but subsequently stalled, descended, hit the runway and then bounced and skidded a few times on it's main gears. Before descending into the embankment where it exploded.

    The engine failure/fire occured after v1 during the takeoff roll, in any circumstances exempting conditions that would prevent it from flying. The rotation has to occur and even with a failed engine, with enough rudder deflection it should ther aircraft should maintain enough lift and ground clearance

  • Good Job! i know what happent, or i have a clue. They forgot to set the Wing Flaps to Take-Off "Flaps Set To 5".

  • well done!

  • thank you you to

  • its nice that you made a replicate of the actual incident. but it just wudnt be right to do something like that. but on the other hand its a nice thing to tribute it to all those innocent souls.

  • and hey see I went inn a flight witch landed in basel insted of Keflavik Iceland and the reaport was the plane was overweigt wen it landed so the plane may have broken in the middle

  • yh but keep in mind you were using a simulator. the real thing can have multliple failures and cuase various parts to stop responding. so mayb they were using the rudder but the hydralics were reacting. so you should think out side the box.

  • but remember boeing made change to the hydralics after UA 232 and JAL 123

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more