Added: 3 years ago
From: ZeitgeistMovie
Views: 6,388
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Man made God in their image!

  • The same people who call Zeitgeist and the Venus Project NWO would have called the Roman Empire NWO, the ironically would have called Jesus a Communist 'globalist', etc.

  • So it's all a question of audience. On Alex Jones there are Jesus freaks, atheist-haters and other theists while we get atheists, agnostics, christians questioning their faith, open minded christians and deists with Peter Joseph

  • 5:51 = Alex Jones. It's a shame Peter goes lightly on the issue of Eugenics, then again it's the best way to freak people out and to make them dismiss the whole point (well, actually, the second best way for you Americans, the first being exposing Religion)

  • the eerie stupid echo effect in her mike is pissing me off

  • Change must come in you.. Don't take is words for it.. Do your own research and set yourself free.

    Brilliant teacher never the less...

  • The breaks constantly interrupt him when he's on a roll. F-ing annoying lol.

  • Religion is very violent. Religion is a product of the violent species called man.

  • I guess your not listening to joseph... man, inherintly is not violent, evil or greedy, these are things learned by your surroundings. Evil is the product of man, not the species

  • You're correct. What I'm saying is religion, money, and all these other things gives man a reason to be divided and violent. Of course people are not born violent. Violent behavior is a bi product of the environment they grew up in. I want nothing more than to get rid of the monetary system myself. All it's ever created was inequality, corruption, war, greed, poverty, crime, and people exploiting one another for profit making.

  • Violence born of scarcity. Now that scarcity is totally obsolete there is no valid basis for religion. It exists today on account of pure ignorance.

  • Right on. I couldn't agree w/ you more.

  • I've listen to Peter speak in several shows, and I really think his ideas are aligned with the what the majority of people are thinking; its just that he is not afraid to explore the nature of human beings; which is to give and building trust in one another. The responsibility of being alive,is to contribute positively to the Global Perspective, so that everyone else can enjoy their lives to its full potential thus contributing to your experience as well.

  • The theory of the great cycle of the ages, has within it a period of awakening and descending in consciousness. As we move towards the great central sun we awaken and as we move away we fall asleep.

    1 full cycle is 25900 years(precession equinox's).

    The Pyramids are there to remind us of our forgotten past where we may have been more advanced than now.

    So the notion that humanity will always be advancing technologically sought of contradicts the knowledge of the great cycle/consciousness idea.

  • now is the end of an age bc

    were entering the Aquariun Constellation

    an area flooded with spiritual energy from the central sun of the galaxy sparking the evolution/revolution of the planet

    as we shift across an age every 2155 yrs

    our sun may eclipses the central sun on 2012

    but the tranistion (which began in 1844)

    out of Pisces completes on 2029

    into the true golden age or the age of wisdom

    or the revolution age

    right now is the end of days in that sence

  • onetazien smokes too much weed XD

  • He does not pommel religion as such. Zeitgeist 1 chapter 1 points out how we are in a cycle of ages, and each religions story is symbolic of that age/zeitgeist.

  • he is quick and immensely literate for a person of his age - when he's saying "sure" you can feel that he has read, seen or heard that before.

    i don't blame him, because thats only style, not content.

  • Peter is sharp. This man should run for God. I would vote for him.

  • lol

  • I think they're just using different communication modalities so they never really achieve a good rapport and it takes a while for Peter to process what she's saying. He does a pretty good job though!

  • Agreed. He does the best he can with the communication disparity that stems from the fact her points are not necesarily conveyed in a generally understandable way. She does make good points, it's just the way they are presented could use polishing on her part.

  • "Sure, sure, right, right" is a good response to most of her points. I don't think his intent is to be short or mean, he says he agrees with her on a lot of ideas. Either way I'm pleased with the intellectual conversation between the two. Absolutely contrary to his interview with Alex Jones.

  • I don't blame him. I don't really know what the hell she is trying to say.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more