Added: 2 years ago
From: seattle4truth
Views: 5,092
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (94)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The US government would never allow any re-investigation into this criminal event. Obama and his crew all know that the result would be very damning for the US on an international level. Many countries could take legal action against the US for falsely leading them into a ' War on Terror' that was really a false flag event to get them into Afganistan and Iran to satisfy the needs of Israel.

  • ABC is owned by Zionists, as are all the major news corporations. Zionists have been proven to be criminally insane crackpots who's primary agenda is to help Israel, however demented that help is. They and the Bush family are responsible for 9/11. That's why they're trying to discredit the 9/11 Truth Movement...to stay out of the the Attica gas chamber. It won't work. The evidence is in.

  • General Electric one of the worlds biggest weapons manufacturers, also owns 1/3 of the American media, including, NBC, History channel, A&E, telemundo, universal studios, and the list goes on and on.

    The international weapons market was flat before 911.

    There is no way any of the GE owned media outlets will report or broadcast anything that will potentially affect their bottom line. And their bottom line (weapons sales) depends on the propagation of global conflict.

  • Great piece of propaganda... Only people without any kind of discernement will believe ABC ZIONIST propaganda to cover their Satanic Handlers.

  • You are never, ever, ever going to get an unbiased report from the media on 911. They are controlled by the purse strings of the elite the one's who are ushering in this new world order, to think anything else is beyong dellusional!

  • I can't believe you nut jobs can't see the truth. The "evidence" you say you have can not be offered or recreated as "proof" of anything. The propaganda pieces you put out to work the "Sheep-people" or "Sheeple" into a disbelieving frenzy is pathetic. Oh, should I mention I'm talking TO the main stream media?

  • Do some fools still think it was Bin Laden and 19 Arabs? Amazing....

  • This is what they want, for 9/11 to go the same way as the JFK conspiracy and just be 'talked about 100 years from now'.

    9/11 is not the same as the JFK conspiracy or the landing on the moon. 3,000 people died that day and we want real answers. 9/11 is worse than Watergate.

  • @jtking2504

    You think the moon landing is a conspiracy?

    Theres certainly a conspiracy around JFK's assasination. I mean, without a doubt its to obvious theres a cover up on his death.

    If you cant determine the murderer of your own president, the murder was commited on the inside.

    So theres also a conspiracy to 9/11, probably due to israel in my view and a weak US government.

    Wether that was orgestrated long before the event, whom knows?

    The moon landing is a completely different subject.

  • thinking the moon landing is a conspiracy is like doubting that spaceshuttles exist, and doubting whether the earth orbits the sun and the moon the earth.

    You have clearly no knowledge about gravity.

    Perhaps in the sense that things drop to the ground.

    We use the same force of rockets and the mathetmatics of gravity to put a human there.

    And the soviet union has said (and which is documentated) that they confirmed the landings of the USA the date at which it happened.

  • and during the time, the soviet union and america, didnt go along pretty well. If theres one thing the soviet union wished for, was a excuse or a cover-up to tell the world it was hoaxed. But they coudnt, because the apollo program installed mirrors on the lunar surface which big telescopes here on earth can laser to receive signals back.

    This information is all documented on thousands of sites. Nobody during the 1960s 70s had a pocket camera. Cameras were used by rich people and basically

  • media.

    Perhaps that is the reason why you dont have library with moon pictures and mission videos as the best cameras during that time were black and white pixelated blurs.

    Yes we havent got back to the moon, and that seems weird. It is less weird to see it as obvious since 1 apollo moon rocket costed about 10billion dollars just for the purpose of landing 2 people on the lunar surface for a few hours.

    And there hasnt been any cheaper revolutionary way to get there apart from the biollion

  • dollar rockets,

    So thats why we went there, and never came back.

    The reason why apollo looks fake is because the spacecraft itself is a washing machine and looks hardly realistic.

    Thats because it isnt. We could have launched a luxury spacecraft to the moon, without the wooden coffin lookalike. But that would make it heavier requiring perhaps a 100billion dollar rocket.

    So rocket parts, and spaceships that are rocket propelled are small for a reason.

    Sorry for changing the subects,

  • @hippiegrinder,

    A hypothesis that does not make accurate predictions is WRONG. PERIOD! No Tall Steel Building has EVER collapsed from fire before or since 9/11...

    Silent Explosives? watch?v=agUrb4z55vo and watch?v=HPffjh29HHs

    Unknown Individuals? watch?v=PZKS73tNVL8 and watch?v=c5XvCby_EHk

    Once again shill, you have no idea what you are talking about! Explosives are used to bring down buildings in controlled demolitions, there's nothing exotic about it.

  • @NanoThermite911 The hypothesis might be wrong. Or the hypothesis might simply be incomplete as to certain conditions. Or the experiment conditions might not match the hypothesized conditions. Darwin's theory of evolution doesn't account for every form of life we see on Earth; does that mean it must be wrong and Creationism must therefore before correct?

    And thanks for the videos, but I've seen it all before. It's nothing new, just propaganda by Troofers for Troofers.

  • @NanoThermite911 Please read the 25 rules of disinformation by Michael Sweeney. I see you are debating with these useless shills. Its easy to expose them once you see their tactics being displayed. I just hate to see people waste their time and energy debating these agents of disinfo. I figure if they are that brainwashed by the MSM there isnt a lot of hope for them anyway. Keep the good fight.

  • HA HA HA HA! A bunch of deranged lunatics like Dylan "Fucktard" Avery trying to outsmart legitimate scientists. All Truthers should be tortured and beheaded.

  • @hippiegrinder,

    What legitimate scientists are those and where can I review their investigations?

    Dylan Avery is a fucktard I agree. He is not a scientist at all.

    Why don't you talk about the real scientists or some of their arguments?

    I am fully prepared to debate anyone on the science of 9/11. So let's go where is your evidence to prove that steel skyscrapers can collapse symmetrically at near gravitational acceleration and produce smoldering piles which burned underground for 3 months?

  • @NanoThermite911 That's the basic problem with Troofer logic right there. "Fire and gravity did not produce these effects prior to 9/11; therefore, something else must have produced these effects." But since nothing else produced those effects prior to 9/11 either, why the rush to consider thermite or explosives? You might as well consider UFO's and lightning strikes while you're at it.

    Fire and gravity were known to be present; a legitimate investigation will therefore focus on those causes.

  • @hippiegrinder,

    No one rushed to claim thermite... It's not like we just pulled that hypothesis out of a hat you know... Scientists first tested samples of the dust and found iron rich microsphere which were spectrographically identical to reacted thermite. Upon further investigation nanothermite chips were discovered. The progression towards hypothesis is logical and scientifically consistent.

    A legitimate investigation would have immediately tested for the presence of such elements.

  • @NanoThermite911 If that were true then you might be onto something. But your timeline is backwards. Steven Jones started talking about thermite on page 5 of his "Why Indeed..." paper from September 2006, long before he was even testing dust. Sure enough, his subsequent work verified what he wanted to see.

    When a building collapses after massive aircraft damage and/or a fire, shouldn't an investigation focus on those causes, instead of guessing at outside causes?

  • @hippiegrinder,

    My time line is not off. Thermite was a suspect before he tested dust samples due to the video showing yellow hot sparkling liquid pouring out the southeast corner of tower 2, that you morons tried to claim was Aluminum with absolutely zero proof. Instead of just claiming it was this substance, Dr. Jones actually took it a step further and did some actual tests and experiments to prove or disprove his hypothesis. Where are your tests?

  • @NanoThermite911 You've now shifted your story 180 degrees from "testing the dust led us to to the thermite" to "we proved our thermite theory by testing the dust". See what you're doing? You're so psychologically attached to the thermite myth, you're willing to get there by circular reasoning if you need to.

    Until mainstream science adopts Jones' findings, they amount to little more than religious scripture. Most of us don't take things on blind faith. Sorry.

  • @hippiegrinder,

    Sorry, in science a theory is worthless if it does not make accurate predictions. The creatioNIST theory forwarded by the Government has absolutely no data to support the hypothesis. The Thermite & Explosives theory is still a valid hypothesis, until the Government performs thorough chemical testing of physical evidence to prove that there were no explosives.

    The Government has instead spent millions to avoid this simple task. Why? Who's theory has more scientific validity?

  • @NanoThermite911 A hypothesis that can solve the problem with known factors -- fire and gravity -- is inherently more likely than a hypothesis that introduces exotic new factors, like silent explosives placed in an undetected manner by unknown individuals. The government's theory has more scientific validity for the simple reason that it is more plausible.

    Why do you say that NIST has "absolutely no data?"

  • troofers and mentally ill and anti American, they will shape anything to fit there sick agenda

  • Comment removed

  • Lunatic fringe. Isnt that the same thing they said to Alex Jones?

  • What a bunch of Luciferians New World Order trash heads, these ABC folks are!

  • a guy at the supermarket mentioned a youtube video about the dancing isrealis and the actual police dispatch call where the cop called in a van with murals on each side of the twin towers and nyc skyline being dive bombed by a jumbo jet exploding.If that isn't involved 30 minutes after it happened I don't know what does.They also took polygraph tests and failed them.It is called on youtube "mossad caught in van on 9-11"filled with explosives" gw bridge. look at it then get back with me.

  • There are still bodies popping up on the roofs in NYC. I'm sure you can find some dust with nanothermite chips in there. Go reanalyze those chips ala Dr. Steven Jones. 9/11 was an inside job.

  • @theandrew668 What are you going to say once this thing cracks open and you find out you've been dead wrong and your entire worldview collapses down around your ankles? Better to open your eyes now and prepare yourself, never in the history of the world did the criminal world leaders have to face a public armed with the Internet like they have the past 15+ years. It's beginning to put an end to their strongest allies, secrecy and public ignorance. Wake up silly.

  • Please, does anyone really trust the lame stream media any more?

  • Why does the mainstream media never interview the Pilots for 911 truth. Respected professionals who state the alleged terrorists did not possess the ability to fly the planes. Or the 1,200 plus Architects for 911 truth who state the buildings could not have collapsed because of fire at free fall speed. They cant be classed as the lunatic fringe and that's why they are never questioned.

  • Well, Lee Hamilton, maybe we wouldn't still be talking about Lincoln, JFK, etc if we were told the truth.

  • At the end ABC makes claim that the story that "19 hijackers inspired by Osama bin Ladin did all this" is the simplest answer....that may be true, but only when you ignore the fact that bin Ladin was a CIA asset, the fact that NORAD stood down, the fact that WTC7 fell, the fact that skyscrapers fell at freefall speed into their own footprint apparently due to fire. ABC says it's simple, 19 guys with boxcutters "did all this".

  • @noNWOthx And at least six of those hijackers were found alive and well later! But they're still being blamed in your media... It's unbelievable. Good luck with bringing forth the truth. Greetings from Finland :)

  • ABC news and Alex Jones Looks like hes ready to sale out again. ABCs 20/20! According to Gray, Alex Jones sold his soul to ABC for a lousy $700.00. Not only is this a despicable act, it should also send red-flags up to every patriot in this movement; because if Jones could so easily sell-out this family, how much loyalty do you think he has to the rest of us?

  • All this piece dose is prove that a b c is compliant in the cover up of 911 , and it is in there interest to do so for there are charges of collusion waiting down the road . I consider time spent following there propaganda a lesson in tyranny .

  • we were lied to about

    WMD & Iraq and Al Qaeda's relationship....

    The MIC has no credibility on this one

  • which one is it Mr. Hamilton. Heres what you and Kean had in yoru book

    watch?v=Tzrv-e37Es8&NR=1

    Here's what you said to CBC

    watch?v=Tzrv-e37Es8&NR=1

  • Guess what: 9/11 WAS an inside job.

  • its funny how the question that the puppets in the media(FOX,ABC,MSNBC,etc).. ask condescendingly to everyone isnt really a question that needs explanation ...its YES OR NO...WITH OR AGAINST...its just makes corporate american neocons think ... if these people think that our governemt had something to do with the death of our people, they are crazy conspiracy theorists with know validity...Look at history n motives....it sickening

  • How can you be a 9/11 truther and possibly NOT be anti-government?

  • What? Not anti-government-------just against a govt that manipulates, and lies to the people its supposed to work for? Tell me, when you can remember our government working for we the people, and not for their own benefit?

  • def not since they sold us to the rederal reserve

  • architectural Illuminati pyramid at 0:01

    followed by total propaganda

  • pretty smart smitty

  • anyone find it funny everytime there is a so-called loned nut, that he is called by all 3 names? like lee harvey oswald, or john wilkes booth, or this new pentagon guy. i thinks its kinda suspicious.

  • They don't need to do a "hit piece" Just talk to a "truther"...they do it themselves. They are insane....tinfoil hats and all...

  • @TheAndrew668 I have spoken to many "debunkers" and looked at a good deal of the evidential basis for the official story.

    Someone is insane here, but it's not the truthers.

  • I am believe 9-11 was an inside job, and the only people that I think are insane are people like you. How can you believe the official story? Explosives were found in the rubble! The buildings fell at free fall speed! The list goes on and on. It does not matter anymore; your arguments are over. The truth is coming out, and people like you, and your ridicule, only make the flood of truth stronger. The more you ignore, ridicule, and fight the truth, the stronger it will become, so keep it up!

  • first they ridicule you

    then they fight you

    then you're right

    -ghandi

  • The court of public opinion is all but decided on this issue.

    We are now nine years on and the littany of unanswered questions is profound.

    19 hijeckers operating from a cave in Afghanistan is perhaps the most bizarre & complex hypothesis for the way in which this crime of the century was executed.

    Now the system will attempt to demonise any that express dissent.

  • Already knew what this video was going to be about, they were trying to discredit 9/11 truthers from the beginning

  • In due time....ppl will add 1 and 1

  • the "official" story i dont believe.pilots and arci and engineers for 911 truth make some very strong arguments ,its sickening to think the gov could have been involved in it.i still dont want to belive it.but any time you go against the grain people dont like it.oh well no matter what you think its still your god given right as an american to have your opinon and question the gov.PERIOD.

  • This is why people are turning there TV's off. This is shameful yellow journalism.The use of editing and cherry picking the most compromising clips of people, shows without a doubt that ABC set out from the beginning of this piece to marginalize the Truther movement.

  • the official 9-11 story holds about as much water as the Santa Claus story. A convenient lie to cover up true intentions.

  • i love the fact that MSM is forced to acknowledge the existence of the 911-cover-up movement. In THEIR perfect world, not even a subtle whisper of such a thing would be mentioned.

  • more of this to come.

    check your backs when you leave the house...there has been a target placed on most.

    as for the guy not wanting to give 'theories' any credit...why then do we teach evolution?

    the arrogance of these 'reporters' is obvious...called to be unbiast, but such a trate is never seen...guilty until proven so seems to be the rhetoric now.

  • ironically, ABCnews wrote an article about Rice's testimony to the 911 comission

    the president received 40 warnings face to face from the director of central intelligence that a major al-Qaeda attack was going to take place, Rice testified

    some of the 9/11 Commissioners pointed out, this was in marked contrast to the way the government operated in December of 1999, when it had similar information and it successfully thwarted attacks.

    google

    Clarke: Rice testimony abcnews

  • Yea they tried a hit but it didn't pan out for the NWO Media machine. The Free falling in the videos is the only prof needed for a controlled demolition. Plain and simple.

  • none of these NEWS outlets even FOX will ever allow someone to present all the augments and evidences to the American people on TV.

  • The government is not privileged to the workings of the intelligence community, therefore 9/11 was not an inside job. The cover-up is however.

  • i do not agree.

  • 3:37 It's not a BELIEF that the msm are complicit, it's a FACT. See Eustace Mullins' pamphlet 'Who Owns The TV Networks?', first published in the early nineties. ABC, CBS, NBC, all Rothschild/Rockefeller/Morgan-­controlled propaganda institutes for The Federal Reserve Conspiracy.

  • 3:36 "why wouldnt they"?! great answer!!!

  • they were right about the slant

  • did anyone notice the illuminated pyramid at the start???

  • yeah and.....................?

  • and STILL the reporters are using the 'melt the steel structure' that everyone says thet never said - this guy discredits his own 'knowledge' of 9/11 - jet fuel cannot melt steel - 825c max temp of fire - 1510c temp at which steel melts - molten iron can be seen flowing from the corner of the tower - it melts at 1535c and is the product of an aluminothermic reaction - thermite burns at 2500c - and molten aluminum is silvery not bright orange (Wein's Law - gives colours of molten metals)

  • Great report by this reporter. FOR ME TO POOP ON!! So what special qualifications does he have to ask scientific questions!

  • What a desperate attempt to continue the cover up. I would say Chris could be guilty of treason as well now. What is the harm in having an other look at this if there is nothing to hide?

  • This is awesome! Total Come to Jesus moment!

  • It is highly probable, actually I say a literal FACT, that these people CNN interviewed brought up information done by accredited scientists and the over 1,000 professionals Architects and Engineers for 9-11 truth, information on weapons grade thermite, you name it... and CNN cut all that information out in this piece.

  • I said "CNN" - should of been ABC

  • 7:23 "The American people will be arguing about 9/11 a hundred years hence."

    Well of course we will! Because just like with JFK the Gov has sealed the commission's report. Why? Because they don't want us to know something!

  • Ok,they say that 911 was 6 years in the making,now wouldn't that make the Clinton administration responsible? Bush had only been in office 9 months when it happened.

  • @noahsark1962

    The false flags deployed, have nothing to do with a president.

    As in, as much of a dick head that clinton is. He had nothing to do with it. Bush is just plain, too stupid. And oboma, as with the two already mentioned. Is just a puppet attached to strings from (way)higher up.

    As in, think bilderberger group. Then jump up a couple of more lvls.

    Now your getting there. ; )

    Butt... bush being "In" office, at the time. Makes him, responsible.

  • @AlmightyJerk (myself) / noahsark1962 pt 2

    With these new laws we keep spewing forth.

    We might be able to get clinton for "Thinking". LOL : )

  • That idiot reporter makes it sound crazy and almost impossible for an inside job to have happened. Like its some illusion we've all conjured up and its some "Conspiracy theory" hysterical psychosis.

    In the end it doesn't matter if anyone believe the truth or not the people that need to know already are prepared. Keep your food/water/PM's close and your guns even closer!

    Death to the NWO

  • Looks like the hit piece backfired. All they did was recruit for 911 truth. In other words, they did us a favor

  • ummm yeah, evidence is kinda hard to produce when it is either immediately shipped away and melted down or covered by feet of gravel, soil, and sod.

  • Question? Why don`t the folks that get asked questions talk about the "common sense" areas;the film missing from the pentagon crash cams,right as the planes pass by;the non-debris field at the pennsyllvania site and the 2-towers and the pentagon;each plane had 12 tns of alloy that is much stronger than the steel used in const;there should have been large parts of the rotors or at least recognizable pcs;they wouldn`t just disappear;this is where science could make a come back to credence again.

  • yup, FAILED Hit Piece.

  • Great Upload!

  • Comment removed

  • My proof is building 7. Enron files destroyed. Enough said.

    Someone is full of $#*T

  • wow, that was laughable.. and umm.. desperate.

  • They will twist the words of every man woman and child to stay with there plans beware people for the truth is gonna bite them on there arses

  • shows how dumb the main stream is this is good

  • lol

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more