"rw5791", Dennis is a "shmuck" who won re-election despite the full influence of the israel lobby - so fuck you, dumb ass hick. He's got more balls than your gooch of a mother who spat you out of her ass, you fatherless cunt. Oh no, start crying; waah, boo hoo - a black president. Dennis could probably beat your ass in addition to shaming you with his hot wife - you faggety liitle twank.
you have noted that the political system is a fraud-does that make the constitution irrelevant? there is nothing unique about ron paul-he just tries to adhere to the constitution as he sees it. with the title of "republican" attached to his name, he was able to garner attention to the constitution with his several appearances in the televised debates. i don't blame paul for being part of a fraudulent system, because without it, those constitutional views would not have been heard.
Perhaps not irrelevant but definately not valid. It is an enourmous hypocrisy, written to be intentionally confusing by sons of bitches who meet in the dark howl at the moon. If it were actual, we would not be having this conversation. My opinion is you can't believe in both, as they are in stark contrast and often opposition. Maybe constitutionalists should form their own party. Again, turning people on to the constitution is a good thing, but only if they act on it. Otherwise what's the point?
My point is that the constitution has been made invalid or "impotent" by the political system embraced to keep it "fair". If it's the law, then it's the law. Why all the so-called interpretation? Interesting debate, but my next few videos about why mccain WILL be the president will probably freak some people out. I hope so, anyway.
Vote locally. (from school board to state and US reps) Keep them at odds with the senate. Aknowledge the weakness and failure of the so called federal government. Keep the senate and the appointed "president" at bay. Without money funneling in from the lobbyists, the senate will eventually fall. The House will have no choice but to turn to the people and only the people. It has worked in other contries, but we may be too far gone.
There is no such thing as a "popular" election for president. The "electors" are not legally required to vote for whomever supposedly carries their state, in fact they are not legally required to vote at all. Look at Rutherford B Hays, Kennedy, Bush (twice)and even Lincoln for that matter. So what's the alternative?
Given the population of the US and the ethnic diversity, there should be at least. AT LEAST 16 political parties. There are basically 2. Its all about money - regardless of the "issues". the primaries are a joke, the media is a joke and citizens are left holding their asses.
the reason there are no other political parties is because of the system. the constitution and the electoral process limits the amount of viable parties to 2. We arent a multi-party system were a 2 party system. We need to change the constitution if we want to change the party system.
My best and only advice is to step outside the system and take it down. The constitution is useless if not enforceable, which it isn't thanks to the patriot act. Turn the house against the senate, and either go back to state governments with full veto or restructure congress.
You may think im arrogant when I say this, but im not-in full seriousness, if you think it is bad, make a better system, write it down, and get support for it. The founding fathers made a pretty good system for its time, and it has been the bedrock of some newer governments.
May it also be noted that only nine of the original constitutional and Bill of Rights still exist?
The rest have been done away with or revised over the years especially since 9/11
Let us not forget the impact of the NAU and it's effects? The constitution would cease to exist over time, therefore, your analysis of the constitution would be flawed as it would be useless in the future.
First, the Constitution isnt enforceable because a majority in the congress do not want to enforce it, and the presidency extends their power unjustly. The Judiciary is probably the only balanced system, however, there may be political penetration into the system, and they cannot put the congress or the executive in check,because the executive can choose to not enforce judicial review, and in fact,he has been above the law for using torture.Our Congress needs restructuring, but not what u think
You have alot of answers but not the right answer. Are you in politics? It's ok if you are, I don't judge. The reasons why the constitutuion is invalid and the system does not function are irrelevant, especially if you are a part of the same system. Bottom line- you support it, I wish to destroy it.
Why might I ask are you against the Senate? The Senate had a legitimate duty before direct election of senators-they stood apart from the House and would be less likely to go with good or bad public opinion.
Instead of abolishing the senate why not go back to state rep. election for senators?
if we go back to state governments we enter into a type of confederacy (unless you mean pre-civil war statehood). We cant function as a Confederacy (the articles of Confederation failed for that reason) and the Civil war/War between the States proved the Supremacy of the Federal government over states rights.
I am interested in how you would fix the current system.
Spoken like a regan democrat. Interesting you would use the word supremacy. The confederacy failed because they did not understand how to come together as congress. States rights were "wrong" as it were. Picture your siamese twin fighting you for the "right" to eat a box of razor blades. If you dont fight him to prevent that, you have a dead body attached to you, as the north would have with a slave south.
Ron Paul wont leave the Republican Party because he knows 3rd parties wont win. He wants to bring the Republican Party to the Robert Taft type Republicans
If Ron Paul ran as a 3rd party candidate he would loose his congressional seat and the election.
Interesting analysis, but in as much as he knows 3rd parties wont win, he has to know he wont win telling the truth about anything. But again thats a moot point because the system is fake. Presidents are appointed, not elected. Good point about congress, I am 100% for the abolition of the senate and a restructuring of the house.
I actually completely disagree. I feel that Ron Paul supporters DO know what he is all about because they definately didn't just get his name from the news media.
It's easier to root for the underdog. His "reganisms" serve him well - catch phrases like "federal reserve" and small government. His web supporters don't watch too much tv anyway, so that would have to be his base. See my additional comments below.
I voted for Ron Paul and I'd argue your characterization of his supporters is unfair...but this is all beside the point; I consider myself a Kucinich and Gravel supporter as well nonetheless.
It boils down to supporting truthful and respectable public figures as opposed to the ones your television sells you- I would have been delighted to have seen a gen. election between Paul and Kucinich as opposed to the bought-and-paid-for clowns we have now.
Perhaps unfair, but reasonable due to lack of specifics. And no one has answered my question of why he wont abandon the republicans, who have obviously abandoned him.
Paul has answered that before. Its essentially the same reason Kucinich wont leave the Democratic party- even though they have abandoned and ridiculed him as well.
Paul represents what the Republican party has always CLAIMED to stand for. He is the one who walks the walk, as does Kucinich in his party...this is one of the reasons both men (while of very different political ideologies) are good friends.
Also, it is next to impossible to get anywhere on an independent ticket.
The reason he won't abandon the repubiclans is because he has always stood for 'republican values' and the republicans now are actually like Old Democrats. Although he does not agree, Ron Paul knows that this country is run by a two party system. He wont change parties because he will not be given the same fair chance, and he wants to restore the party, bring back the party beliefs and values.
Sooo... by saying 'republican values' you can only mean reganism, which he absolutely stands for, AND his economic platform is liberatarian, again, like that asshole regan in order to con people into rethinking what a regan democrat is and what the republican party stands for. If what you are saying is accurate, which it may not be, then I have lost what little respect I had for ron paul.
To be honest, thats the reason almost everthing destructive occurs. Oil was a forgone conclusion, they find a way to take it regardless. The israel lobby is also forcing Kucinich out of office in OH.
it really doesn't matter how ron paul is characterized-republican, libertarian, etc. those names don't really matter. what matters is his ideas about smaller government, less taxes, and non-intervention. seems like the media and those who control the media hates the spreading of these ideas, no matter who they come from.
point well taken, but anybody can "talk" about those things. accomplishment however is an impossibility inside this system and therefore a moot point.
but if talking about it makes people more aware, and a greater number of people become aware, then you can make a real change. that's when "power to the people" become relevant. there's strength in numbers, and if the number of people become large, they can wield a lot of power toward the direction they want it to go. ron paul seems to have a large following, and these people support him simply because of his constitutional ideas. these ideas in the minds of many people can be very influential.
I understand your point, but it is an alternate reality. Force of numbers is powerful when in opposition, which in this sham of a system cannot truly exist. They all play the same game, regan democrats, liberal republicans, it's all a part of the manipulation process. see comments above.
Fuck Obama-Dennis is substantial! And he's as fricken eloquent as Obama too.
However hes not black or a woman,so it seems the superficial media and the democrats who eat their shit arent interested in actual substance.
Also I have to partially agree with the PRfirm about Ron Paul supporters, but I also have to disagree.There are some people who really know his and some who dont, just like any campaign.Personally, I know in depth his policies
He's balkan, so the law of probabilities (a physical law) says that he can never be president, neither can hillary or obama. Every president has been white and male and middle to late in age because that was how the country was set up to run but those gutless creeps 230 years ago. Sadly thats how it will remain until the system is destroyed.
"i can handle things,i'm smart,not like everybody says." ya little shmuck.
rw5791 3 years ago
"rw5791", Dennis is a "shmuck" who won re-election despite the full influence of the israel lobby - so fuck you, dumb ass hick. He's got more balls than your gooch of a mother who spat you out of her ass, you fatherless cunt. Oh no, start crying; waah, boo hoo - a black president. Dennis could probably beat your ass in addition to shaming you with his hot wife - you faggety liitle twank.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
Great video here...good work with this one. You spent quite some time on this?
johnhart30 3 years ago
Oh yeah, and anyway...great video.
Good footage here.
Gonzo707 3 years ago
you have noted that the political system is a fraud-does that make the constitution irrelevant? there is nothing unique about ron paul-he just tries to adhere to the constitution as he sees it. with the title of "republican" attached to his name, he was able to garner attention to the constitution with his several appearances in the televised debates. i don't blame paul for being part of a fraudulent system, because without it, those constitutional views would not have been heard.
jastheswift2 3 years ago
Perhaps not irrelevant but definately not valid. It is an enourmous hypocrisy, written to be intentionally confusing by sons of bitches who meet in the dark howl at the moon. If it were actual, we would not be having this conversation. My opinion is you can't believe in both, as they are in stark contrast and often opposition. Maybe constitutionalists should form their own party. Again, turning people on to the constitution is a good thing, but only if they act on it. Otherwise what's the point?
thePRfirm 3 years ago
My point is that the constitution has been made invalid or "impotent" by the political system embraced to keep it "fair". If it's the law, then it's the law. Why all the so-called interpretation? Interesting debate, but my next few videos about why mccain WILL be the president will probably freak some people out. I hope so, anyway.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
Vote locally. (from school board to state and US reps) Keep them at odds with the senate. Aknowledge the weakness and failure of the so called federal government. Keep the senate and the appointed "president" at bay. Without money funneling in from the lobbyists, the senate will eventually fall. The House will have no choice but to turn to the people and only the people. It has worked in other contries, but we may be too far gone.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
There is no such thing as a "popular" election for president. The "electors" are not legally required to vote for whomever supposedly carries their state, in fact they are not legally required to vote at all. Look at Rutherford B Hays, Kennedy, Bush (twice)and even Lincoln for that matter. So what's the alternative?
thePRfirm 3 years ago
Given the population of the US and the ethnic diversity, there should be at least. AT LEAST 16 political parties. There are basically 2. Its all about money - regardless of the "issues". the primaries are a joke, the media is a joke and citizens are left holding their asses.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
the reason there are no other political parties is because of the system. the constitution and the electoral process limits the amount of viable parties to 2. We arent a multi-party system were a 2 party system. We need to change the constitution if we want to change the party system.
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
My best and only advice is to step outside the system and take it down. The constitution is useless if not enforceable, which it isn't thanks to the patriot act. Turn the house against the senate, and either go back to state governments with full veto or restructure congress.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
i must disagree.
You may think im arrogant when I say this, but im not-in full seriousness, if you think it is bad, make a better system, write it down, and get support for it. The founding fathers made a pretty good system for its time, and it has been the bedrock of some newer governments.
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
key words, for it's time. Slavery, materialism and occultism.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
May it also be noted that only nine of the original constitutional and Bill of Rights still exist?
The rest have been done away with or revised over the years especially since 9/11
Let us not forget the impact of the NAU and it's effects? The constitution would cease to exist over time, therefore, your analysis of the constitution would be flawed as it would be useless in the future.
johnhart30 3 years ago
It still stands that Ron Paul is the only individual running for the presidency who is not a member of the CFR, and their corrupt ways.
johnhart30 3 years ago
First, the Constitution isnt enforceable because a majority in the congress do not want to enforce it, and the presidency extends their power unjustly. The Judiciary is probably the only balanced system, however, there may be political penetration into the system, and they cannot put the congress or the executive in check,because the executive can choose to not enforce judicial review, and in fact,he has been above the law for using torture.Our Congress needs restructuring, but not what u think
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
You have alot of answers but not the right answer. Are you in politics? It's ok if you are, I don't judge. The reasons why the constitutuion is invalid and the system does not function are irrelevant, especially if you are a part of the same system. Bottom line- you support it, I wish to destroy it.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
They don't want to enforce it, cause they (the politicians) want to do away with it.
This convenient NAU deal would erase all borders and nullify the constitution as we know it.
In my opinion, the judicial branch of this country is one of the most lawless and corrupt their is.
If they receive the right price, they will have any outcome favor the ones whom have paid the most.
johnhart30 3 years ago
agreed. legal impropriety is the basis for civil unrest in every culture.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
Why might I ask are you against the Senate? The Senate had a legitimate duty before direct election of senators-they stood apart from the House and would be less likely to go with good or bad public opinion.
Instead of abolishing the senate why not go back to state rep. election for senators?
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
The senate is controlled by lobbyists. A blind man could see that.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
if we go back to state governments we enter into a type of confederacy (unless you mean pre-civil war statehood). We cant function as a Confederacy (the articles of Confederation failed for that reason) and the Civil war/War between the States proved the Supremacy of the Federal government over states rights.
I am interested in how you would fix the current system.
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
Spoken like a regan democrat. Interesting you would use the word supremacy. The confederacy failed because they did not understand how to come together as congress. States rights were "wrong" as it were. Picture your siamese twin fighting you for the "right" to eat a box of razor blades. If you dont fight him to prevent that, you have a dead body attached to you, as the north would have with a slave south.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
Ron Paul wont leave the Republican Party because he knows 3rd parties wont win. He wants to bring the Republican Party to the Robert Taft type Republicans
If Ron Paul ran as a 3rd party candidate he would loose his congressional seat and the election.
We need Ron Paul and Denis Kucinich to stay
in congress.
tomrdee 3 years ago
Interesting analysis, but in as much as he knows 3rd parties wont win, he has to know he wont win telling the truth about anything. But again thats a moot point because the system is fake. Presidents are appointed, not elected. Good point about congress, I am 100% for the abolition of the senate and a restructuring of the house.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
I actually completely disagree. I feel that Ron Paul supporters DO know what he is all about because they definately didn't just get his name from the news media.
rjksoccer06 3 years ago
It's easier to root for the underdog. His "reganisms" serve him well - catch phrases like "federal reserve" and small government. His web supporters don't watch too much tv anyway, so that would have to be his base. See my additional comments below.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
There's no need to mince it up.
I voted for Ron Paul and I'd argue your characterization of his supporters is unfair...but this is all beside the point; I consider myself a Kucinich and Gravel supporter as well nonetheless.
It boils down to supporting truthful and respectable public figures as opposed to the ones your television sells you- I would have been delighted to have seen a gen. election between Paul and Kucinich as opposed to the bought-and-paid-for clowns we have now.
Gonzo707 3 years ago
Perhaps unfair, but reasonable due to lack of specifics. And no one has answered my question of why he wont abandon the republicans, who have obviously abandoned him.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
Paul has answered that before. Its essentially the same reason Kucinich wont leave the Democratic party- even though they have abandoned and ridiculed him as well.
Paul represents what the Republican party has always CLAIMED to stand for. He is the one who walks the walk, as does Kucinich in his party...this is one of the reasons both men (while of very different political ideologies) are good friends.
Also, it is next to impossible to get anywhere on an independent ticket.
Gonzo707 3 years ago
The reason he won't abandon the repubiclans is because he has always stood for 'republican values' and the republicans now are actually like Old Democrats. Although he does not agree, Ron Paul knows that this country is run by a two party system. He wont change parties because he will not be given the same fair chance, and he wants to restore the party, bring back the party beliefs and values.
rjksoccer06 3 years ago
Sooo... by saying 'republican values' you can only mean reganism, which he absolutely stands for, AND his economic platform is liberatarian, again, like that asshole regan in order to con people into rethinking what a regan democrat is and what the republican party stands for. If what you are saying is accurate, which it may not be, then I have lost what little respect I had for ron paul.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
israel is more of a reason there is a war in iraq than oil, though oil is a factor.
jastheswift2 3 years ago
To be honest, thats the reason almost everthing destructive occurs. Oil was a forgone conclusion, they find a way to take it regardless. The israel lobby is also forcing Kucinich out of office in OH.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
I tell you what though.
I dont like Barr, and Paul is not running in an independent race.
Nader is my fall guy, but depending on his policies, I may not want to vote for him.
If dennis does run a 3rd party run, id vote for him in a second.
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
The fact that Ron Paul will not abandon the republicans, especially in favor of the liberatrians, it makes you question his motives.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
it really doesn't matter how ron paul is characterized-republican, libertarian, etc. those names don't really matter. what matters is his ideas about smaller government, less taxes, and non-intervention. seems like the media and those who control the media hates the spreading of these ideas, no matter who they come from.
jastheswift2 3 years ago
point well taken, but anybody can "talk" about those things. accomplishment however is an impossibility inside this system and therefore a moot point.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
but if talking about it makes people more aware, and a greater number of people become aware, then you can make a real change. that's when "power to the people" become relevant. there's strength in numbers, and if the number of people become large, they can wield a lot of power toward the direction they want it to go. ron paul seems to have a large following, and these people support him simply because of his constitutional ideas. these ideas in the minds of many people can be very influential.
jastheswift2 3 years ago
I understand your point, but it is an alternate reality. Force of numbers is powerful when in opposition, which in this sham of a system cannot truly exist. They all play the same game, regan democrats, liberal republicans, it's all a part of the manipulation process. see comments above.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
ron paul's motives are to change the republican party and take it back to its roots. Hes doing a good job for now.
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
HOLY CRAP!
Never heard dennis like that before!
Fuck Obama-Dennis is substantial! And he's as fricken eloquent as Obama too.
However hes not black or a woman,so it seems the superficial media and the democrats who eat their shit arent interested in actual substance.
Also I have to partially agree with the PRfirm about Ron Paul supporters, but I also have to disagree.There are some people who really know his and some who dont, just like any campaign.Personally, I know in depth his policies
RationalLiberty 3 years ago
He's balkan, so the law of probabilities (a physical law) says that he can never be president, neither can hillary or obama. Every president has been white and male and middle to late in age because that was how the country was set up to run but those gutless creeps 230 years ago. Sadly thats how it will remain until the system is destroyed.
thePRfirm 3 years ago
He's like a Croatian bulldog. Good for him. Too bad this country is full of jagoffs.
soundboy72 3 years ago