Jurassic Parks are supposed to excel petty decency. This movie would have been descent if it were something that didn’t carry the awesome responsibility, by name, the first movie established. If they were gonna make a movie this "unincredible" they should have made it a different movie all together so it wouldn’t desecrate the series.
Ok, please don't bash me, but JP3 WAS kinda disappointing compared to the first two movies. But Jurassic Park III is good. It just could have been a lot better. But all-in-all, this movie was descent.
Oh please, JP3 was an improvement compared to the shit tastic second movie, i honestly can't believe people diss JP3 and then defend a shitty movie like the second one with horrible acting and characters
1 & 3 are my favorites, they had the best cast, i absolutely hated the 2nd one, complete bullshit on the 'bad cast', Sam, Billy all of them were great, Jeff godbloom was about the only good thing in the second one the rest was a shitfest, if you didn't like it fine, get over others do
Your opinion is your opinion but compare the 2 films
Jp3 had - Crappy CGI, To Short, Horrible Story, Dreadful dialog, Horrible actors ''but sam neil'' Where was the Music Score? Anti Climatic ending? Killed the Rex in 40 seconds? The ending with the Raptors just walkin off was a joke, a bear would do worse. The blonde chick was stupid as fuck, ] boy survived 8 weeks on the island n Collected ''T-Rex piss'' oh fucking please. theres alot more i could add if you like.
fucking jack horner had 2 ruin the movie, i liked it, but that son of a bitch Jack Horner HAD 2 tell them 2 have the t rex get killed when t rex is king and could of snapped the spinos neck in 20 secs since the Rex has a Bite force of 3 tons and even up TO 9 FUCKING TONS!!! T REX COULD & WOULD KICK THAT SPINED BACK BASTARDS ASS
this movie got no awards broke no boundries. When jurrasic park first came out they had no idea how they would do it. It pushed the boundries of film and technology. I feel this part if the series was pointless and boring. You dont care if anyone dies and it was obvious they started the film before the scrip was even finished.
7. you think this movie sucks then make a better version. Or go trash talk another movie that someone else got more money than you'll ever make creating. Because we that love this movie don't want to hear your irrational comments
i agree with you i dont think jurrasic park 3 sucked i but i was a little dissapointed with it as in i feel they rushed into the main part of the film to quick witht he spinosaurus and familys not my thing but then again thats my opinion someone might watch this movie and say oh my gawwd this is awesome
5. Exactly how many of you haters are critiques that have the right to say "this sucks," rather than ," i thinks this sucks" if it's your opinion fine, everyones got there own express it as you see fit, but don't proclaim that opinion in the form of a fact!
6. Don't you dare try to convince the people who love these movies equally that one is better than the other
Sometimes things are just too clear and evident, man. Just accept it, no one loved this movie because it sucked completely, in almost every, possible, single point of view a movie can be criticized from. It just looses on all sides from the predecessors. And there is a motivation to this, simple and real: no Micheal Crichton, no Steven Spielberg, no David Koepp. Plot looks like wrote from a 15 yo, and i was 15 yo when i watched this for first time.
What is a fact? A fact is either something that can be proven scientifically or when 90% of people say it's true. You can't say that that nobody has the right to say it sucks, because from a professional view, jp3 really did suck. It had terrible reviews, most of the people who watched it said it sucked, and it also sucked. If you're dealing with something that can't be proven scientifically in any way, then the mass opinion counts. And most people said this movie sucked. So unfortunatly it did
3. Does no one care about the magnificent casting or acting?
4. this movie added an element of horror that the other two movies didn't have, you never knew who would live or die. in the other two movies the people who died didn't matter, when Mr Arnolds dies in the first movie no one cares (in part because it doesn't show his death). but watch 3 and tell me you don't want to reach out and save Nash when he begs for his life as the Spino rips him from the plane
That's not true, you can always tell when someone is going to die. They just have this... "look". And Although the first two movies were big hits, this one just didn't have the pizazz that the first 2 had. It's like the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. The first was great, second was good, 3rd sucked. The fourth is probably going to suck too.
okay idiots who don't like 3 here is why youre idiots;
1. When the 1st movie came out it was a visual revolution. Any mistakes made were overlooked because of the dinosaur movies made before (not many) those where the comparisons that the audiences made.
2. Ever hated a sequal because it wasn't able to show up the original? What if 3 came first? it visually surpasses both of the previous movies, and had you seen it first and then watched the other two you would admit to it being the best
ok idiots who don't like 3 this is why youre idiots:
1. When the the 1st movie came out it was a visual revolution any mistake made was overlooked because of what dinosaur movies there where to be compared to (not many)
2. How many movies have you thought sucked because it tried to show up the previous film? If 3 had come out first youd be confused (story wise) but youd love every freakin second, because the cgi surpassed any thing before it.
When I was told there's a new Jurassic Park movie coming out, I didn't believe at first. Then I went to the mall and saw all the huge cardboard logos and posters... I nearly pissed myself. Even though this movie was not nearly as good as the last one and astronomically far from being as good as the first, it was still amazing seeing Alan Grant and dinosaurs together on the big screen again.
compaired to the first movie, first movie is so much better cause it´s original but if you look at it as a seperate movie it becomes another dino movie, and i kinda liked it cause it´s cosy and reminds me of lost. in the first movies the t-rex ownes all the dinos their is, the animals doesnt get more terrifying and stronger then that but i think they tried to give the people an animal that were even more terrifying then t-rex
compaired to the first movie, first movie is so much better cause it´s original but if you look at it as a seperate movie it becomes another dino movie, and i kinda liked it cause it´s cosy and reminds me of lost. in the first movies the t-rex ownes all the dinos their is, the animals doesnt get more terrifying and stronger then that but i think they tried to give the people an animal that were even more terrifying then t-rex
I think this movie is bad if you compaire it with the first movie because it´s not anything like it but if you think of it as a seperate movie, i kinda liked it. it was cosy and it reminded me of lost. In the first movies its all about t-rex and it´s like the god of every dinos and it got a lot of power and it´s big and all. I think they just wanted to make a dino that was even more terrifying, but t rex still rules:)
What on earth were they thinking when they made the plot? A boy lands on an island and his poor mom and dad come and rescue him? That's not a plot for a movie, that's a plot for a quick and dumb fan-fiction written by some nerd. I'm not critizing either fan-fiction, which can be good, or nerds, as I think of myself as one. But that is a horrible plot. If your child goes missing on some deserted island, you can't afford going there and he's been gone for three weeks, you're not going to!
lame movie. absolutely a complete b-movie; which is awful, cause jurassic park needs to get a-sequels. first one was a fantastic experience, second could have been better, but was big and entertaining. third "movie"? a joke. joe johnston is an idiot - still don't know what spielberg sees in him ...
@jumin82 Steve and Joe were friends. Joe wants to direct the Lost World, but Steve said if there will be a third film, Joe would be in the director's chair. And there it goes.
JP3 was the worst and most dissapointing movie ever. i just hope jp4 will be better. i mean damn why the hell are they going to replace t-rex the best dinosaur that made jurassic park what is. With a fatass retarded fish eating dinosaur that nobody likes. and why the fuck was their a different director fdor this movie? it's no wonder the movie suck so bad.
somethin to do with the fact that they are related to birds....i guess they wanted it to be more scientifically (shitty spelling) correct...if that is the correct term
Why is it that they kept changing the Raptor Skins for every movie? Part 1-Brown,Part 2-Orange with black Strips(Tiger Skin) Part 3-White with black Strips (Female),Dark Smocky grey with a few hairs on the head for males...
In each film, they were a different species of raptor. It doesn't explain that in the films, but you have to look it up. Such as on the Jurassic Park Legacy.
And, in Jurassic park 3 it were the male raptors. That is the reason of the stripes and so. Remember, the raptor who took the egs at the end was female, and it was grey like in JP 1.
JP1 - Brownish raptors, all females. A geneticaly modified breed, made to be less dangerous.
JP2 - Orange with stripes male raptors, brownish females are allso there. Theese are the same raptors as in first movie.
JP3 - Different species of raptors, from the second island. They are more inteligent and dangerous. Theese are the original form of raptors, without the genetic modifications.
In my opinion JP3 raptors sucked. If JP4 has them, its gona suck.
it wasnt that grate, the T-rex got the first bite in and would of killed the Spino, the T-rex had the most powerfuly bite out of all the dinosaurs, so when that Rex rushes in bites down hard on the Spino which forces it to the ground it would have been fuck, im not saying the Spino couldnt kill the Rex, its just that the Rex got first bite and in Dinosaur times that was everything, Lets just hope Jurassic Pak 4 is better
the first and second were the best, hope the 4th is good, i wont get my expectations high like i did with spiderman and batman begins which really sucked. it seems like the 90s was the peek in movie making, and everything now is mediocre on a colossal level
yeaaa actually in my opinion 2 was the stinker. how can u have a jurassic park movie without sam neil? imean really wtf. sure jp3 wasnt that good but still better than jp 2. jp 2 was....idk too european-ish for me
jp 1 was obvosuly the besssssssst and lsot world was kickass too but jp 3 idk...it seemed...funny at times....made me sad..but w/e heard their making another one....hope they nail it
fuck u birdman! the lost world was the best jp movie ever made cus it had more hunters eatin up & more T-rex action in it + it was long too & I like that, & the 3rd was nothin.....fuckin nothin but 1 dino chasing only just a little bit a ppl until the short end which was so lame, how can the 3rd b better than the lost world, I'd smack ur ass birdman, u aint shit
Jp III have a stupid story. I cry, Jp was the Best movie i saw ever, Jp II was almost sogood as JpI.But Jp III was the lames part for every real an of jurassic park 5/10 for JPIII
you love them joe? why did you fuck it all up?
d15er 1 year ago
Jurassic Parks are supposed to excel petty decency. This movie would have been descent if it were something that didn’t carry the awesome responsibility, by name, the first movie established. If they were gonna make a movie this "unincredible" they should have made it a different movie all together so it wouldn’t desecrate the series.
battlerosesx 1 year ago
I would love to see the fourth one!
Gun10001 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mommy, can I have that Spino, raptors and t-rex for my birthday....PLEASE??? I <3 u mOm... LOL xD
charesmagnuelle 1 year ago
2nd movie focused more on the shit storm between hunters and environmentalists.
ruhani777 1 year ago
was a fully mobile raptor ever made?
in any of the JP Films?
sHAd0W11591 2 years ago
it's so amazing that the spinosauris (sorry i cant spelle) was made live action by stan winston instead of an ILM CG effect.
junoreactor05 2 years ago
i loved Sam Neil in these movies
except the 2nd since he wasn't in it
the 1st and 2nd i could hardly understand because i was so young. but when i grew older i understood.
but of all of them JP 3 is my fave.
battousaiblade 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
JP3 is a non-sense movie, it fucked up JP and JP2 LW, and to fucked up more, they made a non-sense dinosaur that killed the best dino ever...
cotonete777 2 years ago
Ok, please don't bash me, but JP3 WAS kinda disappointing compared to the first two movies. But Jurassic Park III is good. It just could have been a lot better. But all-in-all, this movie was descent.
naruzard959 2 years ago 8
I agree! When I saw this movie, I liked it but I didn't LOVE it like I did the first two movies. I think it's the CGI that killed it for me.
xoclkox 2 years ago
I think they should make an TV series out of the books...what happens in the book happens in your television...that would be great
BloodyDanielFilms 2 years ago
I say Reboot this franchise. . It needs to be done. . JP1 could have been a darker tone and better.
The Lost world was a worthy sequel but was NOT as good as it could have been.
Jurassic park 3 was terrible all together and should have had a better plot and ending to the dinosaurs franchise in a good way.
Way to anticlimatic and very boring for only 80 minutes.
Reboot the franchise, make it a trilogy only and make it better then the first.
That was ressurect the franchise.
XxComablackxX1937 2 years ago
1. JP one and two were great (see "the making off)
2. JP 3 wasn't directed by steven Spielberg so it's logical that it wasn't as good as one and two
laperdepaperhond312 2 years ago
i agree with you, apart from what you said about JP1
''a darker tone and better''? .....no, just shut up, its a fucking great movie and a classic so dont say it could have been better for fuck sake.
kontuckyman 2 years ago
Why do people try and defend this movie? Jurassic park 3 was a over-all bad film esp compared to the first 2.
The Dialog, Characters, and plot were very Childish outside of ''Sam Neil he's great''
Replaceing Rex with Spino was terrible esp 20 minutes into the movie, thats like making a batman movie and batman dying in 20 minutes.
The boy actually survivng 8 weeks on the most dangerous island on the planet?
The T-Rex piss?
Lets not forget the Anti-climatic ending.
XxComablackxX1937 2 years ago
Oh please, JP3 was an improvement compared to the shit tastic second movie, i honestly can't believe people diss JP3 and then defend a shitty movie like the second one with horrible acting and characters
1 & 3 are my favorites, they had the best cast, i absolutely hated the 2nd one, complete bullshit on the 'bad cast', Sam, Billy all of them were great, Jeff godbloom was about the only good thing in the second one the rest was a shitfest, if you didn't like it fine, get over others do
radicalcannibal 2 years ago
Your opinion is your opinion but compare the 2 films
Jp3 had - Crappy CGI, To Short, Horrible Story, Dreadful dialog, Horrible actors ''but sam neil'' Where was the Music Score? Anti Climatic ending? Killed the Rex in 40 seconds? The ending with the Raptors just walkin off was a joke, a bear would do worse. The blonde chick was stupid as fuck, ] boy survived 8 weeks on the island n Collected ''T-Rex piss'' oh fucking please. theres alot more i could add if you like.
XxComablackxX1937 2 years ago
in the second one they did not put emphasis on the velociraptors in the previous film and now in this film!
RobotsGreatWar 1 year ago
fucking jack horner had 2 ruin the movie, i liked it, but that son of a bitch Jack Horner HAD 2 tell them 2 have the t rex get killed when t rex is king and could of snapped the spinos neck in 20 secs since the Rex has a Bite force of 3 tons and even up TO 9 FUCKING TONS!!! T REX COULD & WOULD KICK THAT SPINED BACK BASTARDS ASS
TyrannosaurusRex97 2 years ago 3
this movie got no awards broke no boundries. When jurrasic park first came out they had no idea how they would do it. It pushed the boundries of film and technology. I feel this part if the series was pointless and boring. You dont care if anyone dies and it was obvious they started the film before the scrip was even finished.
Fiorwestcoast 2 years ago
What's the name of the new dinasour?
southafricaness76 2 years ago
7. you think this movie sucks then make a better version. Or go trash talk another movie that someone else got more money than you'll ever make creating. Because we that love this movie don't want to hear your irrational comments
andrejuarez 2 years ago
i agree with you i dont think jurrasic park 3 sucked i but i was a little dissapointed with it as in i feel they rushed into the main part of the film to quick witht he spinosaurus and familys not my thing but then again thats my opinion someone might watch this movie and say oh my gawwd this is awesome
englandftw111 2 years ago
5. Exactly how many of you haters are critiques that have the right to say "this sucks," rather than ," i thinks this sucks" if it's your opinion fine, everyones got there own express it as you see fit, but don't proclaim that opinion in the form of a fact!
6. Don't you dare try to convince the people who love these movies equally that one is better than the other
andrejuarez 2 years ago
Sometimes things are just too clear and evident, man. Just accept it, no one loved this movie because it sucked completely, in almost every, possible, single point of view a movie can be criticized from. It just looses on all sides from the predecessors. And there is a motivation to this, simple and real: no Micheal Crichton, no Steven Spielberg, no David Koepp. Plot looks like wrote from a 15 yo, and i was 15 yo when i watched this for first time.
ONLY positive point: casting.
ItalianoConfuso 2 years ago
What is a fact? A fact is either something that can be proven scientifically or when 90% of people say it's true. You can't say that that nobody has the right to say it sucks, because from a professional view, jp3 really did suck. It had terrible reviews, most of the people who watched it said it sucked, and it also sucked. If you're dealing with something that can't be proven scientifically in any way, then the mass opinion counts. And most people said this movie sucked. So unfortunatly it did
Giganotosaurus1993 2 years ago
3. Does no one care about the magnificent casting or acting?
4. this movie added an element of horror that the other two movies didn't have, you never knew who would live or die. in the other two movies the people who died didn't matter, when Mr Arnolds dies in the first movie no one cares (in part because it doesn't show his death). but watch 3 and tell me you don't want to reach out and save Nash when he begs for his life as the Spino rips him from the plane
andrejuarez 2 years ago
That's not true, you can always tell when someone is going to die. They just have this... "look". And Although the first two movies were big hits, this one just didn't have the pizazz that the first 2 had. It's like the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. The first was great, second was good, 3rd sucked. The fourth is probably going to suck too.
Giganotosaurus1993 2 years ago
@Giganotosaurus1993
they stopped production on Jurassic Park 4
SlaveLaborFan 2 years ago
okay idiots who don't like 3 here is why youre idiots;
1. When the 1st movie came out it was a visual revolution. Any mistakes made were overlooked because of the dinosaur movies made before (not many) those where the comparisons that the audiences made.
2. Ever hated a sequal because it wasn't able to show up the original? What if 3 came first? it visually surpasses both of the previous movies, and had you seen it first and then watched the other two you would admit to it being the best
andrejuarez 2 years ago 3
ok idiots who don't like 3 this is why youre idiots:
1. When the the 1st movie came out it was a visual revolution any mistake made was overlooked because of what dinosaur movies there where to be compared to (not many)
2. How many movies have you thought sucked because it tried to show up the previous film? If 3 had come out first youd be confused (story wise) but youd love every freakin second, because the cgi surpassed any thing before it.
andrejuarez 2 years ago
When I was told there's a new Jurassic Park movie coming out, I didn't believe at first. Then I went to the mall and saw all the huge cardboard logos and posters... I nearly pissed myself. Even though this movie was not nearly as good as the last one and astronomically far from being as good as the first, it was still amazing seeing Alan Grant and dinosaurs together on the big screen again.
Tododialisimo 2 years ago
compaired to the first movie, first movie is so much better cause it´s original but if you look at it as a seperate movie it becomes another dino movie, and i kinda liked it cause it´s cosy and reminds me of lost. in the first movies the t-rex ownes all the dinos their is, the animals doesnt get more terrifying and stronger then that but i think they tried to give the people an animal that were even more terrifying then t-rex
picasso94 2 years ago
compaired to the first movie, first movie is so much better cause it´s original but if you look at it as a seperate movie it becomes another dino movie, and i kinda liked it cause it´s cosy and reminds me of lost. in the first movies the t-rex ownes all the dinos their is, the animals doesnt get more terrifying and stronger then that but i think they tried to give the people an animal that were even more terrifying then t-rex
picasso94 2 years ago
I think this movie is bad if you compaire it with the first movie because it´s not anything like it but if you think of it as a seperate movie, i kinda liked it. it was cosy and it reminded me of lost. In the first movies its all about t-rex and it´s like the god of every dinos and it got a lot of power and it´s big and all. I think they just wanted to make a dino that was even more terrifying, but t rex still rules:)
picasso94 2 years ago
What on earth were they thinking when they made the plot? A boy lands on an island and his poor mom and dad come and rescue him? That's not a plot for a movie, that's a plot for a quick and dumb fan-fiction written by some nerd. I'm not critizing either fan-fiction, which can be good, or nerds, as I think of myself as one. But that is a horrible plot. If your child goes missing on some deserted island, you can't afford going there and he's been gone for three weeks, you're not going to!
Tommygun1135 2 years ago
lame movie. absolutely a complete b-movie; which is awful, cause jurassic park needs to get a-sequels. first one was a fantastic experience, second could have been better, but was big and entertaining. third "movie"? a joke. joe johnston is an idiot - still don't know what spielberg sees in him ...
jumin82 3 years ago
@jumin82 Steve and Joe were friends. Joe wants to direct the Lost World, but Steve said if there will be a third film, Joe would be in the director's chair. And there it goes.
charesmagnuelle 1 year ago
JP3 was the worst and most dissapointing movie ever. i just hope jp4 will be better. i mean damn why the hell are they going to replace t-rex the best dinosaur that made jurassic park what is. With a fatass retarded fish eating dinosaur that nobody likes. and why the fuck was their a different director fdor this movie? it's no wonder the movie suck so bad.
lindlin123 3 years ago
This movie was so bad, badder than JP2
j33zluis 3 years ago
somethin to do with the fact that they are related to birds....i guess they wanted it to be more scientifically (shitty spelling) correct...if that is the correct term
luckystrike5201 3 years ago
JP 2
WAZ THE BEST
XBOXMANOR360 3 years ago
Why is it that they kept changing the Raptor Skins for every movie? Part 1-Brown,Part 2-Orange with black Strips(Tiger Skin) Part 3-White with black Strips (Female),Dark Smocky grey with a few hairs on the head for males...
Saladdin07 3 years ago
This is to prove the evolution of the Raptors.
RPDEric 3 years ago 2
In each film, they were a different species of raptor. It doesn't explain that in the films, but you have to look it up. Such as on the Jurassic Park Legacy.
mesozoicisland22 3 years ago 2
And, in Jurassic park 3 it were the male raptors. That is the reason of the stripes and so. Remember, the raptor who took the egs at the end was female, and it was grey like in JP 1.
quaxswed 3 years ago
This is what it says on the web:
JP1 - Brownish raptors, all females. A geneticaly modified breed, made to be less dangerous.
JP2 - Orange with stripes male raptors, brownish females are allso there. Theese are the same raptors as in first movie.
JP3 - Different species of raptors, from the second island. They are more inteligent and dangerous. Theese are the original form of raptors, without the genetic modifications.
In my opinion JP3 raptors sucked. If JP4 has them, its gona suck.
RippersToll 3 years ago
in the books it said they didn't want to make dinosaurs less dangerous, i didn't know they actually did in the film...
MoondogAlice 2 years ago
oh and one last comment if i may.
JP's length was a huge dissapointment. 90 minutes???
u bust ur ass for 2 yrs and we get 1hr 30mins ?
cmon, as Joe Johnston said this is one of the best franchises EVER.
so y go from 2 hrs. 20 mins down to a mere napoleon dynamite 1 hr 30 mins?
xplay101 3 years ago
my favorits :
JP 1
JP 3
JP 2 (i fucking hate jp 2 it blows so bad dude)
xplay101 3 years ago
it wasnt that grate, the T-rex got the first bite in and would of killed the Spino, the T-rex had the most powerfuly bite out of all the dinosaurs, so when that Rex rushes in bites down hard on the Spino which forces it to the ground it would have been fuck, im not saying the Spino couldnt kill the Rex, its just that the Rex got first bite and in Dinosaur times that was everything, Lets just hope Jurassic Pak 4 is better
reeves155 3 years ago 2
yer and guess what, in my dinosaur book it says that spinosaurus were nearly as big ad t-rex, ovbiously meaning t-rex was biiger still
xxxrockmoshcryxxx 3 years ago
I hate Jurassic park 3 i realy do the director is a rewaly shitty director Spino want a s dangorus as they say it is T-rex is naot a svanger it sux
joeydrawz 3 years ago
jack horner thinks the t-rex was scanvanger and he wanted to see that in JP3
eagc7 3 years ago
the first and second were the best, hope the 4th is good, i wont get my expectations high like i did with spiderman and batman begins which really sucked. it seems like the 90s was the peek in movie making, and everything now is mediocre on a colossal level
civilright 4 years ago
batman begins sucked? you're so wrong in my opinion.
tbag18244 4 years ago 3
WTF This is not BatMan Begins Its Jurassic Park 3 Go And Look For BatMan Begins Videos You Idiot
Crimsonhe 4 years ago 6
Yeah a lot of trust he is placing on you... and you fuked up. SIgh
tedoymisojos 4 years ago
i love the three jurassics parks but i think that the first and the second are better then the third!! I WANT A JURASSIC PART IV
CorrsfanPortugal 4 years ago 3
dont worry! Jurassic Park IV will be here in 2010...
kougermasters 4 years ago
i read it on wikipedia that it will come out in 2009
iantennysonlee 4 years ago
haha they still bother giving a date? :)
tbag18244 4 years ago 2
3 IS THE BEST.
paleodot95 3 years ago
yeaaa actually in my opinion 2 was the stinker. how can u have a jurassic park movie without sam neil? imean really wtf. sure jp3 wasnt that good but still better than jp 2. jp 2 was....idk too european-ish for me
xplay101 4 years ago 3
JP3 had bad casting and a bad story line. also I didnt like how the velociaraptors killed for no reason.
Jasonxknot 4 years ago
rely i like jp1 &2 little
but 3 is damen shit
hamadatoon 4 years ago
jp 1 was obvosuly the besssssssst and lsot world was kickass too but jp 3 idk...it seemed...funny at times....made me sad..but w/e heard their making another one....hope they nail it
takataya1999 4 years ago
i liked jurassic park 2 1 was real good as well i watched it when i was like 7 years old loved every bit
salabenchod 4 years ago
jp3 is the real shit house, jp2 is a blast with more REX action & more dino hunters, ur a dumb shithouse birdman
FierceIndian07 4 years ago
fuck u birdman! the lost world was the best jp movie ever made cus it had more hunters eatin up & more T-rex action in it + it was long too & I like that, & the 3rd was nothin.....fuckin nothin but 1 dino chasing only just a little bit a ppl until the short end which was so lame, how can the 3rd b better than the lost world, I'd smack ur ass birdman, u aint shit
FierceIndian07 4 years ago
I LOVE JP 1 & 3!!! But number 2 is just shithouse!
Alan Grant for Prez!
birdman9752 4 years ago
1 and 2 rocked more though
CrossingGermel 4 years ago
was the lady, the producer..an animatronic?
chrysanthemumman 4 years ago
jurrasic park is just another jaws 1st awsome 2nd alright thrid dick fest 4th like haveing to eat mikele jacksons semen
Aspartan3 4 years ago
What you want ? Maybe a Jurassic Park IV will be better.
Premiere is expected in 2008. For a year.
Florek777 5 years ago
Jp III have a stupid story. I cry, Jp was the Best movie i saw ever, Jp II was almost sogood as JpI.But Jp III was the lames part for every real an of jurassic park 5/10 for JPIII
AshPeace 5 years ago