Andrew Bird - Scythian Empires

[KayBiskerow]

Oh, wow, Jesus... that looping at the end was incredible, even through the cell phone. Simply breathtaking... no, not simply... complexly breathtaking. Hauntingly complex. What I love? The person in front there clutching their shoulder near the end... they're haunted, you can tell.

[Gloryboys17]

I would have expected some stupid argument like this over a video about the tensions of biggie and pac or something or a sentence involving jews and muslims but not andrew bird ROFL hahahahaha

[TABWISH]

best song on the album...cant wait to see him in jan..nyc...

[notionridiculous]

This is the most ridiculous YouTube argument ever.

Here, here, hennyjen!

[keegs1298]

seriously, u guys are fags

[ramadonker]

jeez, can't you two email each other????

[hennyjen]

um...what's everyone arguing about? There's like 16 pages of this nonsense.

Mr. Bird is wonderful, that's all there is to it.

[empiremonkey]

It's Duck Season. No, Rabbit Season! Duck Season! Rabbit Season! Duck Season! Rabbit Season! Rabbit Season! B L A M .

[enthusela]

It is bird season! W H O O S H.........

[enthusela]

Waywardbrigand, you pushed until I did look at the history of comments and you did schedule a fight with that guy. You also told him in effect that if he doesn't turn up that following night he'd be considered a coward. Then, realizing how unreasonable such a short notice was, you re-scheduled it for a date a couple of weeks or so in the future. When both parties were agreed, you pulled out and accused the other guy of starting the fight. Well played !

[enthusela]

What business has a floor salesman picking fights about ? Is he going to 'floor' his opponent ? But then he claims to want peace and antagonizes his protagonist. What to do ??

[WaywardBrigand]

Yes, you pathetic fool, I pick fights at work.

Was I the one to make threats? No.

Did I attempt to arrange a peaceful meeting to give YOU the chance to shut me up by any other means then violence? Yes.

And who threatened that after that meeting, the other person would have a career anymore? You!

I'm actually surprised I didn't report you to the cops for that last one. Nope, I just got your account banned.

[enthusela]

You sound paranoid !

[WaywardBrigand]

And?

[enthusela]

Obsessed ?

[WaywardBrigand]

And?

Please continue coming up with qualities I possess because I'm going to certain keep on saying "and?"

[enthusela]

Those are qualities in your mind ? I think I am starting to understand now .

[enthusela]

I meant: you consider those mental conditions to be qualities?

[WaywardBrigand]

Yes, a mental condition is a quality.

Anything that can be used as an adjective is a quality, be it good or bad.

[enthusela]

If a mental condition is a quality, then hell yeah, you have many qualities.

[WaywardBrigand]

If it can be used as an adjective, then it is a quality, it is as simple as that.

By definition, everyone has many qualities. Saying I have many qualities is like saying other galaxies are far away.

[enthusela]

You also seem to have several mental conditions, those that need to be treated.

[WaywardBrigand]

Like what again? Sorry, your stupidity is clouding my memory.

[enthusela]

I am trying to show you the error of your ways and you are too stubborn to listen to reason. You think you were born to argue. Even barristers know when to stop arguing and capitulate. How about under certain agreed conditions, we find some common ground where you can stop just contradicting me on principle and still retain whatever dignity you feel you possess?

[WaywardBrigand]

Ok, here's the compromise: you stop being wrong and I'll stop telling you are.

Deal?

Also: didn't you say you had nothing else to say to me a few days ago?

[enthusela]

No, let's compromise and do what I say! You are wrong, not me! And my exclamation points prove it!

[WaywardBrigand]

How do exclamation points prove it?

Don't answer, I've already got it done for you: it doesn't.

It has been you who has been wrong way more than I, so why should I say that I am the wrong one?

Also: didn't you say you had nothing else to say to me a few days ago?

[enthusela]

I just played you! I made you respond to my claim that exclamation points proved something. You jumped too quickly without proper thought which is your greatest downfall. You thought I was serious about that and you jumped to answer-and I WON! Ha, ha, ha! I may have said things a few days ago and maybe I changed my mind. So what? The main thing is the student became the teacher and played you and WON! Ha!

[WaywardBrigand]

Remember what happened last time you think you won by "playing me?"

I'll refresh your memory with it: "I do not believe anything read or seen on the internet unless I personally know who wrote or did it or if I have no reason to not believe it."

I have no reason to believe you, so I take very few things you say seriously.

You've been played. Yet again.

[enthusela]

You WERE played and you did believe what I said. Because it showed by how you responded to it.

[WaywardBrigand]

Not so much, no, I didn't. My responding method has be the same, whether or not I'm playing you.

YOU have no way to tell one way or the other with my posts, which is how I have intended to do it.

I can tell when you attempt to play me because your posting style changes so it becomes really obvious.

[enthusela]

( Not so much, no, I didn't ) That sounds like back-pedaling to me. You have no method because you are very reactive. I, being pro-active can play you like a piano. Welcome to my recital! The threat of pushing me off a building scared you into protesting your innocence for fear of getting banned. I show no mercy and use fear and or making you lose pride and you jump to it like an organ-grinder's monkey.

[WaywardBrigand]

Where did I say I wanted to push you off a building?

When?

Nowhere, never.

And you can continue thinking you are proactive, but are you not reacting to what I am saying?

How is that NOT being reactive?

[enthusela]

The implication I made of assuming you meant to push me when you said you wanted me to fall and suffer in agony, was made in order to show you how it felt to be played. The very kind of playing you admitted doing. You took the bait and I reeled you in to a smashing victory. Yay ! Responding to your constant questions is a response not a reaction. You on the other hand quickly jumped to protest your innocence, when I suggested you'd push me.

[WaywardBrigand]

Hey look look!

You are wrong!

AGAIN.

I was not played for I was expecting you to try.  So in your measly attempt at playing me, you were the one being played. By yourself.

How pitiful.

[WaywardBrigand]

Also, a response is a reaction to something said.

[enthusela]

I said: 'reactive' not reaction. The term 'reactive' is a fairly new expression which will probably not make it's way into dictionaries. It's elusive meaning is as such: knee-jerk reaction to any stimulus such as my goading you into defending yourself against something implied but not necessarily evidently true. Put that in your smoke and pipe it.

[WaywardBrigand]

Being reactive merely means reacting to situations. You are reacting to my comments. You are being reactive.

And if "put it in your smoke and pipe it" is another pitiful attempt at a joke, you need to stop thinking you are funny, because you aren't. If you messed it up, meh, it happens.

[WaywardBrigand]

And if your definition of fairly new is about 200 years old, sure, it is fairly new.

[WaywardBrigand]

Of course, you are probably just trying to play me, and failing.

[enthusela]

No, a response is an action done for the purpose of achieving the aim intended by the doer.

A reactive person conversely reacts without thinking and achieves nothing but losing more points in the game he started. True story! You started a game and even the rules only to be beat hands down by me. Shame.

[WaywardBrigand]

If you respond to a courteous phrase with a punch, that is still a response so your first sentence is wrong.

Your second part is somewhat true, but a reactive person still responds. A response is still a reaction.

Congrats on winning the oh wait, you haven't won anything, I forgot. I'm sorry.

[enthusela]

A response is not a re-action, it is simply an action. It is so because the response is made to achieve an aim and not a knee-jerk re-action to an insult or whatever one uses to provoke a re-action. My actions are not re-actions because they are responses made with responsibility. See that? I've kept my powder dry and not gotten offended by your insults because they, and you, don't matter to me. You, conversely have re-acted vehemently and almost violently in your re-actions. I win!

[WaywardBrigand]

Poor you and your contradictions.

If I didn't matter to you why do you react to me?

[enthusela]

It DIDN'T matter to me and I DIDN'T react to you. I RESPONDED because I decided to. It was an action and not a re-action. I thought you understood the explanation I gave you on that. You have forgotten the basics, grasshopper.

[enthusela]

Oh yeah nearly forgot...that was another win for the gipper (me ). Although I could have let that one go, it's not like I desperate for points like you, I am way ahead!

[WaywardBrigand]

Actually, no so much, it wasn't.

[enthusela]

" Actually,no so much, it wasn't". Not so much means a little at least. You are officially on record as having admitted the truth of what I said. That multiplies my score by twenty-fold.

[WaywardBrigand]

0 times 20 is still 0.

[WaywardBrigand]

You are confusing reaction and reflex.

A reaction can take time to commence. Kinda like a....response, eh?

[enthusela]

Way, a reflex is a mechanical response to stimuli. A re-action is a response that you make automatically when you are goaded into doing so. If something takes time to commence as you stated, then it can be put down to someone's slower re-action time. It doesn't mean the re-actor has any control. It means you were well and truly played, my friend and neighbor.

[WaywardBrigand]

You can control reactions. At least I can, I guess you don't have that much control over yourself.

[enthusela]

You've never shown any restraint in responding, you always predictably deny whatever was said by others in the hope that they will foolishly believe whatever you say, in the same way you make yourself believe. That is called deluding yourself. It is a rather masturbatory activity, but then.........

[WaywardBrigand]

Right, I haven't shown any restraint at all.

Oh wait, I have no reason to believe you. Nothing you have said can be proved and when you ask for proof of something and it is provided, you ignore it to go off and argue about something else.

[enthusela]

Yeah, well, oh wait I have no reason to believe you either. Guess why, this is typed print and anybody can say anything without proving it. You haven't proved anything. If you mean I should call your place of work, forget it. I can't give you the number or address of my place of work, that would be my home number and address. There are lunatics who would love some info like that. Why don't you post your home and address then? Right! See!

[WaywardBrigand]

So even when proof is provided to you you don't take it then ridicule the giver of the proof.

You truly are a stupid, stupid person.

See where I asked where to post the address or phone number of your workplace?

Of course you don't because I didn't ask for either.

[enthusela]

Waywardbrigand, if I, as you say am a stupid, stupid person, the first stupid cancels out the second making me an extremely intelligent genius, don't it? Yes it does! Uh, huh, says spanky. OK, I will call your workplace next week. Satisfied? But you asked me to prove MY work, and the only way would be for you to look into a book's credits in a store, or buy one. For that you would need my name, and my address and other details are also in the details of the book. So stop asking for proof!

[WaywardBrigand]

Then stop making claims.

[enthusela]

By the same token, way, why don't you stop making claims. I wasn't simply making claims. You are very good at steering conversations down blind alleys for the purpose of confusion to the end of 'winning' arguments. That seems important to you. What you call 'claims' that you want proof for are things I needed to say to either answer a question you asked or to explain what I'd said that you had misunderstood. So stop asking for things that you then want proof for.

[WaywardBrigand]

I won't stop making claims because I have at the very least attempted to give proof for claims I have said, something you aren't willing to do, which suggests there isn't any proof in the first place.

[enthusela]

And it doesn't make practical sense for you to doubt everything I say just because we disagree on a vid. These are not opinions we are talking about, they are personal details that I have no need to invent. In fact, and my wife would be thrilled to hear me say this, and I do mean it: I wouldn't change anything about my life right now even if I could except maybe to appreciate it more, if that is at all possible. This is one satisfied customer! or 'happy camper' if you prefer.

[WaywardBrigand]

It has nothing to do with disagreeing on a video, it has everything to do with me doubting you because you haven't given me a good reason not to.

You wouldn't say things about yourself if you didn't want people to believe you, but when someone asks you to provide a little proof, you back down. That gives off the feeling there isn't any proof to begin with.

[enthusela]

I told you the proof would have to be the inside of a book cover that reveals not just my name but my home address and other details. Every nut-job could then contact me at my home instead on a public forum like youtube where most people want to remain anonymous for reasons you should be well aware of. Get it?

[WaywardBrigand]

And every nut-job could then be arrested for harassing you. If you think I am one of said nut-jobs, well, I would have been sending you tons of slanderous private messages, but nay, I have kept these comments private.

Unlike you, I am secure with myself. I am not scared of what nut-jobs could or could not do. At least make an attempt at being a man.

[enthusela]

I don't say you are one of the nut-jobs, I would rather say you seem more of a victim to me. I have not shown fear to man nor beast and to that anyone who knows me will tell you the same. But if a nut-job decides to throw bricks through my windows when I am asleep, it's difficult to find the culprit, even with the police. Even the toughest person can't defend themselves against a threat they can't see or predict. You think you can? Superman?

[enthusela]

Oh yeah, I forgot- you tell me to be more of a man, I am not the one who started and scheduled a fight with a youtube user and then chickened out threatening legal action when the chips were down. WAYWARD!

Now you are putting on a brave face that you aren't scared of nut-jobs, would you post your home address on here like you asked ME to? Virtually!

[WaywardBrigand]

Sure, I would. Why not? I have nothing to be afraid of.

[enthusela]

Do it then! Be a man!

[WaywardBrigand]

You post YOUR NAME first, since you are the one in question.

Be assured, you'll get a location to send some petty thugs to shut up someone you yourself can't.

[enthusela]

Remind me again why I should be the first to post his details?

When I refused to expose my private details, the reason I stated was that anyone could then access them and that goes against internet rules. Then you said you wouldn't be afraid of nut-jobs, and that I was. So I challenged you to do it, if in fact you aren't scared; I called your bluff! Now you want to 'call my bluff'? I wasn't kidding! I will if you do, you are the first to say he would do it without fear.

[enthusela]

Way, I have nothing personal against you, even though you have insulted me I haven't taken it personally. That might sound silly to some, but petty and feeble insults with no substance to them cannot hit home or hit any nerves, I don't care. But be very careful who you call: 'petty thugs'. I don't SEND anybody anywhere! My old friends do what they like, whenever they like.

[WaywardBrigand]

You are getting your history skewed.

The only one that was a fight that I had planned and backed out of had no legal action attached to it.

The second meeting, however, I attempted to make with no intention of making it a fight. When the threats went beyond simple physical harm, which isn't something I fear, and went to making me not able to make a living, then legal action was threatened.

If you want to test my "brave face" then by all means, try. You will find it isn't just a face.

[enthusela]

Your face isn't just a face? Another hilarious comment for all to read- enjoy, everyone!

What is your face also then, a foot?

The physical harm, that you say you don't fear, although you did say you were afraid of getting hurt in one of your comments, is what I understood was what would make you unable to work, what else could it be?

[WaywardBrigand]

My "brave face" isn't just a face I put on. Sorry your feeble intellect can wrap itself around it.

I fear anyone get hurt, but someone threatening me isn't something I mind, especially over the internet.

I just take it more seriously when someone say they will violently make me unable to work.

[enthusela]

Way, you should be aware by now that I don't have a feeble intellect. Your insults are therefore feeble. I reply to your insults, not because they bother me, but because they waste time. I can only imagine that hate would be what fuels the desire to insult, as a way of hurting the other. There are more effective and sure ways. Continued...

[enthusela]

Con't...Now, you said: "If you want to test my "brave face" then by all means, try. You will find it isn't just a face." Saying 'try' then is a challenge. You say I will find your 'brave face' means that you are brave? Are those fighting words to ME now? Are you threatening me? No, no, I don't mind, just curious!

[WaywardBrigand]

It's not a challenge to violence, but if you think mine being brave is fake, try to shake it and find out it isn't. I don't rightly care how.

[enthusela]

I said things about myself in reply to many questions and answers to replies I have dealt with. Whether or not it is believed never crossed my mind. I am an honest person and I can understand how you think I would gain any satisfaction by making stuff up to people I probably will never meet. I was simply explaining my situation in reply to whatever was asked of me. This is not a court where proof is needed.

[enthusela]

Way, serious typo: I am not ashamed of it, I was making a good point and hit the wrong key. I meant: " I CAN'T understand how you would think I could gain any satisfaction from telling stuff about myself that was untrue".

[WaywardBrigand]

Despite what you may think, I knew what you meant.

[enthusela]

Despite that you knew what I meant, you would have used that to further your weak arguments.

[WaywardBrigand]

Proof you don't know me.

[enthusela]

How can I prove I don't know you? You know I don't know you! Are you trying to imply to the viewers that we know each other and are playing some kind of game here?

[WaywardBrigand]

Nope, I'm simply saying you think you understand how I do things, and you don't.

[WaywardBrigand]

But to make such claims about yourself as you have would imply that you care that people believe you. If you didn't, you wouldn't make such claims.

And if you make claims without a bit of evidence over and over and over again, especially when making just as many, if not more, false claims about other people, it makes you less and less believable.

[enthusela]

Way, I'll admit one mistake that I made and that was to refer to what I have been telling you as 'claims'. You are the one that started calling them 'claims'. I was merely making conversation and mentioning relevant things that PERTAINED to the topic at hand. You chose, probably out of jealousy, to disbelieve anyone could have such a wonderful life and activities like I have and started GRILLING me for proof. And I, never having given you cause for disbelieving me.

[WaywardBrigand]

It was not what you said but how you said it.

You attempted to use the claims you made to justify blatantly insulting an establish musician and his fans, so I called you out on it and look at how many of those claims have been proven to be true (none).

[WaywardBrigand]

And if you think being a stupid, stupid person makes you smart then you really are stupid.

[enthusela]

I forgot, also, I have never responded to a courteous phrase with a punch. I win again !

[WaywardBrigand]

Never said you do or have.

So you don't win.

[enthusela]

You said 'if' and a shove is as good as a wink to a blind man, therefore: ha, ha, I DO win another. I win.

[WaywardBrigand]

Nope, no win for you, just another delusion.

[enthusela]

You just did it again!

[WaywardBrigand]

As did you.

[enthusela]

No, I am playing you like a piano and orchestrating, predicting and preempting your every move. Care for a game of chess?

You see there, that was proaction.

[WaywardBrigand]

Sure sure, you are playing me.

If that's true, then pigs fly at will and planes crawl slowly through the ground.

Yay, you can't play the one who expects to be played. Yay you lose. Yay me.

Keep on trying to play me. It's funny to see you think you are getting the better of me.

[enthusela]

Pigs cannot fly nor can planes crawl slowly through the ground. You lose one right there.

I win every time you open your screen and type something.

Score: 1001 to 0, in my favour.

[WaywardBrigand]

If we were playing golf and that were our strokes, then yea, you have the better score.

Also pigs don't fly nor do planes crawl through the ground, which also means you didn't play me.

So yay, keep on trying to play me weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee­eeeee.

[enthusela]

Pigs and airplanes don't have a part in this game. Lose like a man if you CAN, sore-lose like a girl if you MUST. Printing a load of 'e',s doesn't add up to any points, sorry. I win again.

[WaywardBrigand]

Also, if you were tying to play me, that means what you said in that post was an intentional lie.

That would mean you said that you were wrong and that I am right and that we should do what I said. Thanks.

[enthusela]

You are grasping at straws and whatever will make you feel better. You must live quite a miserable life, and a tiring one always trying to prove you are right no matter how wrong you are. Politicians do that, but they have the intelligence to make it sound plausible at least. You just sound ridiculous.

[WaywardBrigand]

I need not grasp anything, for I already hold the truth, and in the other hand I hold dignity. 

I live a quite not-miserable life. I only attempt to prove myself right to those who constantly wrong.

As of late that has only been you.

[enthusela]

Who do you think you are : the Statute of Liberty? It MUST be miserable always losing the game to me as you do! Especially for one such as yourself to whom it means everything to : trying to win a losing battle on the internet: a battle of wits. Keep flogging the dead horse!

[WaywardBrigand]

You tell me how miserable it is to lose because I'm not the one losing.

[enthusela]

You just lost another one by missing the obvious flaw in my last post: StatUTE of Liberty instead of StaTUE of Liberty. Your country mate, your statue! Get with it. I am tired of playing someone who can't win any. There is not enough competition to make it interesting. This game isn't rich enough for my blood.

[WaywardBrigand]

And you got after me about a typo I pointed out, then get after me about missing one.

Try being consistent, then you can start winning.

[enthusela]

Thanks for reminding me about the typo, that is 10 points for me right there.

[WaywardBrigand]

Try being consistent, then you can start winning.

[WaywardBrigand]

I already said I wasn't going to show up to fight, so you going to start a fight is in and of itself a threat, and I have every right to say if you cause violence (and it will be you, if you a man of your word), there will be legal action.

But I will be there.

[WaywardBrigand]

If you so great, you would find a way to shut me up with words, and I am giving you the chance.

[wellhungvillain]

You don't understand words, you have your own private sense of reality.

[WaywardBrigand]

Wrong, and then wrong again.

Hmmmmmm

[WaywardBrigand]

I haven't told anything BUT the truth to you.

[WaywardBrigand]

I am a floor salesman at Office Depot. Sure, it's not a career, but I am still in school.

And based on my experience so far as well as the comments of my managers, I won't be unemployed any time soon.

So continue being wrong.

[WaywardBrigand]

I wasn't scared of you, I was scared that someone, whomever it may have been, would've been hurt.

I'm still not scared of you, but now I am certain we can prove how wrong you are without violence.

It's Urbana, by the way.

Just to make it clear to you, I am going into this expecting peace. If there is violence it won't come from me and legal action will be taken.

[WaywardBrigand]

Wrong again.

I am not unemployed.

[WaywardBrigand]

No, you will have to find me.

You once claimed you had people researching me. I'm making you stick to that claim and have them find me for you.

Or concede that you were lying in an attempt to make me scared.

Besides, you are one click away from finding out what town I live in, and you have been since you started posting on these videos.

[WaywardBrigand]

I have no reason to be embarrassed. You are the one being constantly egged on, and makes no attempt to stop being egged.

You have yet to make a correct claim about me. Continue trying, please, it is pretty funny.

[WaywardBrigand]

Seriously, find me.

See what happens.

[WaywardBrigand]

I did not crumble. I do not wish physical harm among anyone and I figured if one or both of us was going to get hurt over a stupid argument over the internet, it wasn't worth it.

But go ahead, show up someday.

We'll see who would squirm.

[ivoryiris]

andrew bird is an amazing musician. he may be able to back his songwriting skills with a string quartet, but fucking rocks with what he has. and if you've ever seen a rock concert you can probably expect that a guitar might go out of tune, and if you watch closely enough not only does andrew know, he tries to fix it, in between pluking chords on his guitar. being a musician allows you to appreciate that it isnt what he fucked up, its what he pulled off.

which is fantastic.

[unsungvillin]

Yeah, ivoryiris, he TRIES to fix it ! He can't fix it because he has cloth ears. He was probably TOLD it's out of tune then tried in vain to tune it. Even if his violin gets put in tune, he then plays it out of tune. A guitar's frets determine where the fingers are placed so if the guitar's in tune so will the fingers. Not so with violin. Bird's very fingers are placed out of tune so there's no hope. And there are no writing skills in bird, sorry.

[ivoryiris]

players don't have the ability to judge music? that is nonsense

the point i was making is that, being a musician, i can fully

appreciate Bird's skills even when he's slightly out of tune.

being a musician i understand the difficulty of what he does. listen to the album that this song comes from?

he's in tune and its a beautiful song. thats all that matters.

so he fucked up and got posted on you tube. get over it.

[Mitchicity]

A brick layer who doesn't play music.

Sounds like a guy I would trust when it comes to music.

If you want beginnings and endings... listen to fall out boy or some other pop band. It could be said that that is all their music consists of. Beginning and ending. No depth..no story... just a loud intro.. and a sudden stop or a drawn out loud open chord at the end.

[unsungvillin]

He wasn't talking about beginnings and endings but yeah, that would be a start, no pun intended. I took that to mean that with or without beginnings or endings the stuff in the middle has no direction. I know some say that it's the whole point but I believe that is a cop-out and an excuse for bad writing of a song. There is no depth nor story as far as I can see and that makes it useless.

[unsungvillin]

Oh yeah and a lot of so-called fans are sycophantic and players of instruments who probably hope to be like their idol some day. You get blinded by your desires to accomplish what famous people have done, no matter how bad, or maybe because it's easy to play rubbish. A non-player is a much better judge of music because he has no agenda, just loves music, players don't have that ability.

[WaywardBrigand]

So whom are you to say your opinions are more than those of people who don't play instruments. Sure, you've not said THAT directly, but you have said your opinion is the only one that matters and you are apparently a musician, despite never proving it. What you just said would mean that someone like me, who doesn't play any instruments, is a better judge of music than you. Please sir, stop contradicting yourself.

[unsungvillin]

More nonsense from the brigand- who could expect anything less?

[WaywardBrigand]

If that was nonsense, then you are just an ape that someone taught to type.

Go ahead. Prove me wrong.

[unsungvillin]

I taught MYSELF to type 25 words a minute the FIRST day and gradually increased to way beyond what you can do.

Your logic is taking a severe downturn for the worse. Now, you are asking me to PROVE to you that I am not an APE ?

Because you know nothing about amplifiers and lie and argue for the sake of it makes you call ME an ape ?

How ridiculous is that ?

[WaywardBrigand]

Not ridiculous at all.

You reply as if someone taught you to be stupid and an ass as well as not being able to tell when someone gets the better of you.

Now THAT is ridiculous.

[unsungvillin]

Again wayway, all you can manage to do is call me more names. Ouch ! You probably believe you are hurting me with your insults. That is the only reason I can see why you would continue except that you have nothing of sense to say. You console yourself with the thought that you have gotten the better of me. How sad you are. What little satisfaction you get pales in comparison with what someone actually superior to you gets. Hardy har har!!!

[WaywardBrigand]

What makes that funny is that I could say the exact same about you and it would be true.

[unsungvillin]

Why is that? I've never tried to get the better of you! I know better than that. There is no better to you. You are what you probably always will be: a sad little loser with no more to him than typing stuff that makes him feel like a man. To be a real man, you would have to be willing to say those insults to someone's face, and we all know you are too chicken to do that. You proved that at least.

[WaywardBrigand]

Oh, so insulting you before but not now makes me not a man.

Well played.

No wait...not well played at all. Actually, that was pathetic. You just want to make yourself feel better by putting me down. I hope you love failure because you are wading through it.

[unsungvillin]

Wayward, you keep saying that I want to make myself 'feel better'. I think it's you that wants to feel better, otherwise why always bring it up, like bad oysters. You ran away from a fight that you engineered and made a date for, when you thought bluffing would make you look tough enough to scare away your opponent. You love to insult and cuss others behind your cheap computer screen. You appear to be like a cowardly chicken that leaps at shadows.

[WaywardBrigand]

A large majority of those things have been done by you two.

But if you still want to come beat me like you said you and several other people would do, then by all means.

I should be able to get your "sources" to find me.

[WaywardBrigand]

Oh wait, I don't have to. They should be able to do that all by themselves.

[WaywardBrigand]

But seeing as how you have proven so very little besides that you like being wrong, how bout you stop talking down at Bird and Bird's fans? That way, you stop being an idiot.  Well, at least you'll stop being an idiot HERE.

[unsungvillin]

Sadly for you wayward, not everyone who can't play an instrument is a good judge of music. My friend, the bricklayer would make an excellent musician if he had the time to take off his work to learn to play that guitar he owns. With 4 kids and a mortgage to pay he's busy all the time. He, although not playing at the moment, is a very good judge of music. Like I said, sadly wayward, you are not. and never will be no matter how many instruments you can't play.

[WaywardBrigand]

You fail to prove how a bricklayer is and how I am not.

Apparently, I am not because I like Bird although I like many other musicians who are better than him.

That makes little to no sense.

[unsungvillin]

There is no proof necessary. I know that my friend, who will remain nameless, is a very good judge of music and he has excellent taste. I don't just say that because he likes my band but because of all the other stuff he has suggested and I found every one superb. I know you are a terrible judge of music and have not a speck of taste because of your liking of bird. YOU HAVE NONE TO LESS SENSE.

[WaywardBrigand]

Where did I say he was a bad judge of music because he likes your band? Now you are just making stuff up.

You show, yet again, how stupid you are by saying I have bad taste in music because of ONE band/musician I like, as well as you ignoring when people truthfully say they like other musicians more.

I obviously have more sense than you.

[unsungvillin]

I didn't say that. I said he was a good judge of music, not only because he likes my band, but because of all the other good band he has suggested to me that I liked. I never implied you said he was a bad judge of music. You are still confusing yourself. It is a sign of weakness!

[WaywardBrigand]

Nothing you have said to me and nothing I have said to you has lead me to confusion.

You like to make stupid assumptions about people you have no idea about.

That seems pretty weak to me.

[unsungvillin]

And, yeah, it's true. You can't like bird or anybody that looks or sounds like him and call yourself a good judge of music. You haven't got a clue where to even start. You swallow anything without the smallest amount of sense. You think you have sense? Where are you hiding it? Under your dusty bed? With all the dust bunnies gathering around your dirty socks and everything you are too lazy to pick up. Clean up your room!

[WaywardBrigand]

You do know that I only like a few Bird songs, right?

What I "swallow" is good music from a large array of genres. Musicians both popular and not.

So while you keep making incredibly idiot assumptions to make yourself feel better, I am laughing at you and listening to good music, whatever that music may be.

If you don't believe that I like a large variety of music, I could PM you every band I like split into genre. Then you'd definitely see the error of your ways.

[unsungvillin]

No, you just like bird,bird,bird. That's it, that's all. You think I'm interested in making myself feel better? Why would I want to feel better do you think? I don't feel bad, I feel good. I like myself a lot. You would lie and make up a bunch of 'genres' to show yourself as something you are not. You don't even know the meaning of the word: genre.

[WaywardBrigand]

And you continue to make massively ignorant assumptions about me, whereas I make justified, educated guesses about your lack of moral being, which are most probably true.

You have no idea what I do or do not know. The more you think you do, the more idiotic you really are.

[biggeryash]

Sounds like country and western but without the song structure and energy. The guitar is not supposed to be out of tune is it? Is the whistling done for covering up the fact the lyrics were forgotten or misplaced? Lots of repetition.

[LTcrew]

you are such a fucking loser

[biggeryash]

LTcrew are you talking to me? If so, what do you mean I'm a loser? What in hell have I lost by expressing my opinion of bird, except maybe your respect of me which I don't value let alone care about. Who's the loser now, ltscrew?

[LTcrew]

I thought I'd made it obvious I was talking to you. Saying that the guitar is out of tune (which it isn't), and that he forgot the lyrics (which he didn't) is not an opinion, it's a false declaration. I've seen you and your piece of shit friend tigger going around bashing Bird on too many of his videos. For that, spending your time making fun of an artist where people come to enjoy him, you are indeed a loser.

[biggeryash]

Loserscrew, you say I'm making fun of an artist? Well, if any fun is being made, it's not MUCH fun. There is no fun in bird's music, he's not an ARTIST. If I was making fun, it was unintentional, but anyway, fun is good right? An out of tune guitar is very annoying, especially when it's obvious the player isn't even aware of it, and correct it. When bird forgets lyrics it doesn't matter, anything he makes up is as bad as the written stuff.

[aholden12592]

i was there!!

[biggeryash]

Aholden12592, if you was there, poor poor you. I feel sorry for you.

[aholden12592]

i meant at the concert. i had a better spot

[dvste753]

i love the beginning of this song

[biggeryash]

Dvste753, I am in total agreement with a friend of mine who is an expert on music and has the best taste in music I have ever encountered in someone who doesn't play. He has a guitar but he's mainly a bricklayer,and a brilliant one too. He is very educated and savvy and he says there are no beginnings nor endings in bird's stuff. It goes nowhere having started nowhere.

[dvste753]

Biggeryash, I would be surprised if you had friends. However, if you do have friends, I would not be surprised if they are pretending. Don't bother responding to this, you lowlife asshole.

[unsungvillin]

I don't mind responding to a l.wlife a..hole like yourself dvste753. You've just described yourself perfectly with your behaviour and your childish remarks.

[dvste753]

you smell bad

[unsungvillin]

I take it that's your response dvste753 to my last comnment. Well, your nose must be extra large to smell all the way to France. Maybe, more like, what you are smelling is right under your nose.

[raquellikesvideos]

excellent show =)