you should still build the tranny. too many launches with those numbers and you can kiss that stocker goodbye. you'd prolly post a bigger number with a build tranny too.
this guy is an idiot. 500wrhp can be had on a dmax with trans, tune and lift pump. that will be good for a 12 second pass with a good driver and a 4wd boosted launch.
@Desimes4 why do yo think they took them out of tanks? Because the couldn't handle the stress, the only time an Allison is a good tranny is if it has been built up out the ass.
@rasnake123456789 I don't want to bust your bubble, but we still use them in our tanks, bradleys, paladins, 113's etc. You have lost your mind. You can go ride your tricycle now because its evident you aren't man enough or smart enough to drive a real toy.
@SuperMuise I don't think the torque is right,...456 the torque is more in the 800s. If you listen it sounds like the tranny down shited. My lmm dyno'd 456 hp with 868 tq
are you kidding me? lol you prob have a powerjoke right? how many classic fords do u see drivin around? NOT ALOT!!! u know why? cuz ford cant build anything to last. n fords are so damn cheap.. u get what u pay for. n allison trannys are bullet proof... hence why the military uses duramax. ya fuck up
acctually the Goverment uses Navistar.. which is what Powerstroke uses.. and the Allsions are "bulletproof" up to 150 more Hp then stock motor... and Duramax is foriegn trash...
sorry bud but duramax has never had tranny problems. powerstrokes have had a lot in fact. and just keep in mind that chevy didn't build that piece of shit you guys call a 6.0 powerstroke.
Acctually Ford has never had tranny problems in there HD line trucks... learn some facts. The E4OD in the older Powerstrokes were better then the Allison or just about equal. and keep in mind i never said Chevy didnt build the 6.0 PSD. And keep in mind the 6.0 was not as bad as people say it was... The EGR has some clogging problems. and maybe a couple people had problems with the head gaskets, thats only on certain ones... im just saying building up an engine on a stock tranny is bad
agreed. building on a stock tranny is bad but the 6.0 was an absolute piece of shit that cost ford hundreds of millions. it was just an absolute stupid design.. i mean four head bolts around every cylinder?! come on... that's horribly built my friend
yes. i agree they did have problems. it costed Ford millions of dollars becuase Navistar didnt hold up there end of the warrenty's.. thats why Ford is stopping with Navistar in 2011. but some of the 6.0's were good. some just sucked. there were some that went for hundrads of thousands of miles. there were some that went bad after 20,000..
true. i met a guy who's was at like 270k and he said it loved to blow injectors out. but yeah you can build a 6.0 strong with head studs, fuel system etc. but i'd rather have a chevy.. just my opinion, i mean we can't all like the same thing right? i've just heard way too many horror stories about the 6.0's
my friends dad has an '07 LBZ duramax crew cab 2wd 6spd and he told me on the dyno it made 652rwhp and 1200rwtq and he has 3 mods the new '09 superchips tune, magnaflow 4.5" exhaust and a green air intake. i have seen it walk a vette at the track and so far his best pass was a 13.01 @ 106mph and it was spinning off the line like crazy, is he lying about the hp though?
idk if ive ever seen a semi with 800hp. most of them have low power #s so they dont work themselves 2 death. y do u think they have like 13 spd trannies? lol
the performance tune on the superchips is 77HP and 117 TQ.
now: 365 HP stock + 77 HP = 442HP
no where close to 652 HP. so the intake and exhaust would have to add an additional 220 HP, and thats flywheel ratings! not the rear wheel that you claimed.
SC: 77 HP
PPE: 425 HP
with a bad launch, a 13.01 is possible with 652 HP. but nobody would be making that kind of power with a SC. its possible with extra mods, but they would have already switched over to PPE or EFI Live
all i know is that the truck is a 2wd crewcab lbz dmax with a green cold air intake, full 4.5 inch turbo back and a superchip. i have a bolt on mustang gt and from a 45 roll it walks me, it beats every street car at the track on friday night street drags and it can smoke the tires in 5th gear
well the only thing i can think of is that he isnt telling you everything he has in it. i have a couple of friends that did it. NO ONE except them knew what they had in their engines. all im saying is the mods + the performance dont add up.
i believe u that it does those things but its just not possible to make that power with what mods you have listed
you used the headlight to hold the hood up.... nice one
killapawner 6 months ago
does soot clean off easy ?
xXFmxKingXx 1 year ago
wow thats dirty
dirtmaxpolaris 1 year ago
@robles4242 no dumbfuck that's where the intake is
stlchevy95 1 year ago
nice head light. thats what u get with a chevy
robles4242 1 year ago
how much did the aftermarket stuff cost you
W33Dblazer 1 year ago
how the hell does it make 1140 ftlbs of torque
NROBLEWC 1 year ago
sticker isnt straight, dam i hate when that happens
dieselSumbitch 1 year ago
you should still build the tranny. too many launches with those numbers and you can kiss that stocker goodbye. you'd prolly post a bigger number with a build tranny too.
jt4265 1 year ago
@jt4265
This truck has a Merchant built trans now. The stocker lasted until about 42000 miles. The c3 pack was blue and purple. LOL!
sootchuckers 1 year ago
this guy is an idiot. 500wrhp can be had on a dmax with trans, tune and lift pump. that will be good for a 12 second pass with a good driver and a 4wd boosted launch.
lcarter44 2 years ago
am i reading this right....
STOCK TRANNY? at 1140ft/lbs?
SuperMuise 2 years ago
ya im running a stock tranny and did 1083 ft lbs check it out search dirty d max
davie9kh 2 years ago
I'll look it up...
how long have you been making that kind of power on the stock transmission?
SuperMuise 2 years ago
dude it has a allision tranny it was in a tank for christ sake it can handle it
Desimes4 2 years ago
@Desimes4 why do yo think they took them out of tanks? Because the couldn't handle the stress, the only time an Allison is a good tranny is if it has been built up out the ass.
rasnake123456789 1 year ago
@rasnake123456789 there still in tanks...
Jhod69 1 year ago
@rasnake123456789 I don't want to bust your bubble, but we still use them in our tanks, bradleys, paladins, 113's etc. You have lost your mind. You can go ride your tricycle now because its evident you aren't man enough or smart enough to drive a real toy.
LRWarrior 1 year ago
@SuperMuise I don't think the torque is right,...456 the torque is more in the 800s. If you listen it sounds like the tranny down shited. My lmm dyno'd 456 hp with 868 tq
ddg103 1 year ago
you better upgrade that tranny.. you cant put more then 150HP on a allison tranny....
chevyblows2001 2 years ago
are you kidding me? lol you prob have a powerjoke right? how many classic fords do u see drivin around? NOT ALOT!!! u know why? cuz ford cant build anything to last. n fords are so damn cheap.. u get what u pay for. n allison trannys are bullet proof... hence why the military uses duramax. ya fuck up
vinman66 2 years ago
acctually the Goverment uses Navistar.. which is what Powerstroke uses.. and the Allsions are "bulletproof" up to 150 more Hp then stock motor... and Duramax is foriegn trash...
chevyblows2001 2 years ago
@chevyblows2001
sorry bud but duramax has never had tranny problems. powerstrokes have had a lot in fact. and just keep in mind that chevy didn't build that piece of shit you guys call a 6.0 powerstroke.
ben38619 2 years ago
@ben38619
Acctually Ford has never had tranny problems in there HD line trucks... learn some facts. The E4OD in the older Powerstrokes were better then the Allison or just about equal. and keep in mind i never said Chevy didnt build the 6.0 PSD. And keep in mind the 6.0 was not as bad as people say it was... The EGR has some clogging problems. and maybe a couple people had problems with the head gaskets, thats only on certain ones... im just saying building up an engine on a stock tranny is bad
chevyblows2001 2 years ago
@chevyblows2001
agreed. building on a stock tranny is bad but the 6.0 was an absolute piece of shit that cost ford hundreds of millions. it was just an absolute stupid design.. i mean four head bolts around every cylinder?! come on... that's horribly built my friend
ben38619 2 years ago
yes. i agree they did have problems. it costed Ford millions of dollars becuase Navistar didnt hold up there end of the warrenty's.. thats why Ford is stopping with Navistar in 2011. but some of the 6.0's were good. some just sucked. there were some that went for hundrads of thousands of miles. there were some that went bad after 20,000..
chevyblows2001 2 years ago
true. i met a guy who's was at like 270k and he said it loved to blow injectors out. but yeah you can build a 6.0 strong with head studs, fuel system etc. but i'd rather have a chevy.. just my opinion, i mean we can't all like the same thing right? i've just heard way too many horror stories about the 6.0's
ben38619 2 years ago
yeah true.. opinions are good. lol. but i'd rather a Ford, just a 7.3 :) there very reliable.
chevyblows2001 2 years ago
@chevyblows2001
i love the 7.3 man they are very reliable.. with a lack of power though :( lol
ben38619 2 years ago 5
@ben38619 fords suck big fatty whale wangs i would rather ride around on a skateboard then drive a ford chevy and dodge all the way!!!!
The24vman 1 year ago
@The24vman true that, fords do suck, way rather have a chevrolet.....
ben38619 1 year ago
haha knocking out the headlight to get air into the airbox
alanack67 2 years ago
stuntrider is fuctarded
21duramax 2 years ago 5
my friends dad has an '07 LBZ duramax crew cab 2wd 6spd and he told me on the dyno it made 652rwhp and 1200rwtq and he has 3 mods the new '09 superchips tune, magnaflow 4.5" exhaust and a green air intake. i have seen it walk a vette at the track and so far his best pass was a 13.01 @ 106mph and it was spinning off the line like crazy, is he lying about the hp though?
stuntrider15 2 years ago
If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. No way he made 652 with a Pooperchips.
sootchuckers 2 years ago
go put the '09 superchip tune on yout truck it makes more than ppe
stuntrider15 2 years ago
theres no way the superchips make more power than the ppe lol
02lb72500HD 2 years ago
buddy he should do alot better then 13.01 with 652hp lol and theres no way of it having 652hp with a superchip lol
mike12392 2 years ago
you do realize that the truck weighs over 7,000lbs right? i guess because a semi truck has an 800hp cummins motor it will run 9's right?
stuntrider15 2 years ago
yea but 500 hp diesels pickups r in the 12s man lol and no semis wheigh alot
mike12392 2 years ago 2
idk if ive ever seen a semi with 800hp. most of them have low power #s so they dont work themselves 2 death. y do u think they have like 13 spd trannies? lol
02lb72500HD 2 years ago
the performance tune on the superchips is 77HP and 117 TQ.
now: 365 HP stock + 77 HP = 442HP
no where close to 652 HP. so the intake and exhaust would have to add an additional 220 HP, and thats flywheel ratings! not the rear wheel that you claimed.
SC: 77 HP
PPE: 425 HP
with a bad launch, a 13.01 is possible with 652 HP. but nobody would be making that kind of power with a SC. its possible with extra mods, but they would have already switched over to PPE or EFI Live
EasternAggie 2 years ago
all i know is that the truck is a 2wd crewcab lbz dmax with a green cold air intake, full 4.5 inch turbo back and a superchip. i have a bolt on mustang gt and from a 45 roll it walks me, it beats every street car at the track on friday night street drags and it can smoke the tires in 5th gear
stuntrider15 2 years ago
well the only thing i can think of is that he isnt telling you everything he has in it. i have a couple of friends that did it. NO ONE except them knew what they had in their engines. all im saying is the mods + the performance dont add up.
i believe u that it does those things but its just not possible to make that power with what mods you have listed
EasternAggie 2 years ago
prolly a dumb question so take it easy what does lbz mean or what is it
47redneck47 2 years ago
It's the engine code. LBZ's were the Duramax motors from '06- early '07.
emaxxtraxx 2 years ago 2
oic thanx
47redneck47 2 years ago
Do you run the PPE2 Hot
hiestonation 2 years ago
0:01 wat the fuck is up with that light?
DURAMAXDIESEL12 2 years ago
much more airflow to aem brute force intake, 3 more hp on dyno. removed at the dragstrip for max air flow
sootchuckers 2 years ago
so thats why yu see trucks with the rifght head light missing at the drag strip cool thanks?
DURAMAXDIESEL12 2 years ago
yeah on Duramax's the air filter is right behind the right headlight. i have a scoop on mine now so i don't always have to remove my headlight.
truckaholic 2 years ago
@DURAMAXDIESEL12 the light is that way so the turbo get more air to it
chevytrcuks09 1 year ago
Sharpie Magic Marker
sootchuckers 3 years ago
how did you spell duramax on the tail gate?
62BOWTIE 3 years ago
It has a custom massive jerk tube.
sootchuckers 3 years ago
What's been done to the truck? I can hear stock turbo still.
th3b4r0n 3 years ago
My stacks cover my bed when it rains in soot. Its a bitch to get off.
jonathancasey19 3 years ago