Added: 3 years ago
From: Diddykoi6
Views: 7,491
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this always reminds me of gta San Andreas it was one of those songs playing on radio x

  • Good attempt, but not Faith No More.

    FAITH NO MORE IS LORD!

  • This cover doesnt looks Low-pitched to me

    Especially at 1:26-1:30

  • ... Disappointing cover. Assumed Disturbed would do something energetic and exciting with it, instead it's... yeah. No.

  • sry man,but the original is much more better :)

    FAITH NO MORE(MIKE PATTON) :)

  • this is terribly boring, and the singer doesn't have the vocal skill that Mike has

  • @Diddykoi6 Hey dude, do you know when they did this song and if its on an actual album/demo of theirs? I wanna get it since I love the way David Dramon did this just about as much as the FNM version by Mike Patton.

  • To all those who think this song isn't made by Disturbed. You lot are seriously stupid to just claim that Diddy just got the original and lowered the pitch to make it more demonic...

    Well, if you check Disturbedpedia, then you will regret making false accusations...

    To those who believe me, thumbs up! (Just kidding.)

  • Rock Band 3^^

  • Faith No More's original song was better. Mike Patton is godly, and the new song is just not nearly as good. Disturbed isn't that good.FNM FOR EVER.

  • @FrankWest2009 get your head out of your ass disturbed puts it on a new level

  • if nobody knows who orignally did this song your are idoits! it was like one of the most popular songs in the 90's

  • can you imagine disturbed and faith no more doing a tour together?

  • @90srock That'd be the day.

  • FAITH NO MORE

  • it's quite a good cover...but please, i wouldn't go so far as to imply even for a second that it's BETTER than the original. if anything it's incredibly faithful...they don't do anything that's too far from the original recipe...and mike patton's vocal versatility is what does it for me and for most folks--everything he does oozes talent effortlessly...just watch MP live, esp. with tomahawk and peeping tom.

  • No one or no thing could compare to Faith No More and FNM's originality. Disturbed- well, they're cool they have fans and make money, but they'll always be fakes. Skill-less frauds. But at least they're doing what they love. It's just too bad they have to use another bands song to actually sound cool.

  • Disturbed is EPIC! \m/

    Anyone else who covered this would of sounded horable in comparison, people are just being assholes because they were fans of the original and disturbed did it better.

    Anyone who says "Why didn't it make the album if it's so great?" It doesn't exactly match what they were going for.

  • Suck my cock, disturbed is my favourite band and i was slice ye fucking neck to see them live :)

  • @lewiswoods1

    YEAH! YOU TELL HIM!

    Disturbed is FUCKING AMAZING and i would DIE to see them again in concert! x3

    And i think this is a GREAT cover! then again, Disturbed has ALWAYS been great at everything....=D

    -x-

    I LOVE YOU, DAVID DRAIMAN! <3

  • @diNozzofantatic101 I am going in person in the Souix Falls show!!!!! I live there!!!!!!

  • @pukeslot

    AWESOME!! that sounds like a GREAT place to live, now!!! =D

  • i like this song alot and its done well i love disturbed, but mike patton has a godly voice and its hard to top him

  • disturbed's version is way better, they are way better live, faith no more sucks live so how can they be better?

  • Shows what 20 years does to ya.

  • wtf is bside?

  • "A-side and B-side originally referred to the two sides of 7 inch vinyl records on which singles were released beginning in the 1950s. The terms have come to refer to the types of song conventionally placed on each side of the record, with the A-side being the featured song (the one that the record producer hopes will receive radio airplay and become a "hit"), while the B-side, or flipside, is a secondary song that often does not appear on the artist's LP.

  • I belive the Faith No More (the original) is better since they wrote it and knows completely how to do it, while this version (the cover) is just, to be honest, lame.

  • FUUUU FAITHFAG

  • oooooo i love this song

  • you can totallly tell that this is disturbed just listen to his voice oh and this song is pretyy uber disturbeed are the shit lol

  • disturbed are GODS

  • You can pick disturbed anywhere, Dramain has such a unique voice. This is disturbed it was gonna go on the indestructible B-side.

  • its disturbed...just really REALLY old and someone elses song.

    they redid the cover for indestructible but no1 knows anything about it :P

  • thanks for your input halomaster is probably 9 anyway doesnt know what music is lol =) thanks for watching btw

  • Wossington

    Listen to em that is not disturbed you are fuckign stupid. This is some rip off of disturbed. So please go rot in hell.

  • it is disturbed you idiot you can tell.

    and fuck off avin ago at wossington its my other account lmao

  • no this is disturbeds cover go jack off in ur closet

  • lmao

  • this is a good song thanks for posting it =]

  • You fucking retard. This is Disturbed and you can't call someone stupid when your dumbass mispelled fucking.

  • @Halomaster66 LOL, so how did this argument come about? Just happened to stumbled across your comments.

  • disturbed rocks

  • DISTURBED ROCKS

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more