I can't believe this Ken Ham idiot is Australian. How embarrasing for us Aussies. At least now he lives in the U.S. No shortage of religous morons for him to interact with there. I wonder how many lives could have been saved with the $30,000,000 they spent on building a museum of lies.
Science( the study of observable fact)and the bible will always be in conflict as one tells the truth and the other is an outdated piece of dribble and i hear your friend Ken is opening up a new exhibit featuring Santa Easter bunny and the tooth fairy.just joking but it would be about as credible as the current exhibit and it's not a museum as a museum is a place where objects of historical artistic or scientific interest are exhibited preserved or studied not made up to suit a hypothetical bul
Ken Ham? Maybe he should change his name to Ken SHAM! I mean, I do believe God created everything, BUT, science MUST NOT be ignored! Yes, the universe is 13 bill. yrs. old, No, dinos did NOT live w/ man! (died 65 mill. yrs. ago.). Science & the Bible need NOT be in conflict. Google "Answers in Creation" (NOT to be confused with Ken Sham's "Answers in Genesis"), see the link demonstrating contemporary science and the Bible actually fitt nicely together.
Can you be kind enough to let me know the secret behind this video? Did you actually took time to create it or maybe it a evolve through a long exposure to your camera? Have you got any proove to any of it, I really haven't seen you? Well if I may help a bit : although I haven't seen you I supose after seeing what was created I assumed that there was a creator (an inteligent mind who put all this together - or am wrong?) Spooky stuff :)
@gavincostin1 Just the brainwashed fundy ones. Kind of like the fundy Muslims that think that by blowing themselves up in a supermarket, they'll meet 76 virgins.
@gavincostin1 Just the brainwashed fundy ones. Kind of like the fundy Muslims that think that by blowing themselves up in a supermarket, they'll meet 76 virgins.
@Devin82m You mean the Nephy who maintains that the Earth doesn't rotate on it's axis? The fool that thinks the entire universe turns around Jerusalem and we stand motionless at its center? The Nephy who says that water ejected from the Earth's oceans froze in space and created the craters on the moon? The man who survives by leeching off a disabled woman and claims to be an expert in astrophysics, geology, biology and philology (when the meant to say phylogeny, that was a classic). That moron?
Are you 5 years old? I mean really? He gave a video response to the illegal claims that he is muching off and abusing his friends (who is not mentally challenged). Also He never claimed the earth stands still, nor does he claim the universe revolves around Jerusalem... Try watching the videos again. Also why are you so militant? I mean what purpose do you have in life, why not allow people to believe in God? I mean atheist have caused more harm and death than Christians. Proven fact.
@Devin82m The Crusades, the Inquisition, Manifest Destiny, the Conquistadors, the Thirty Years War, the Hundred Years War, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the British Rape of India, the Opium Wars, African Slavery, just to name a few of the atrocities committed by 'loving' Christians. Oh yeah, and Hitler was a Catholic! You want to hold atheist responsible for the crimes of totalitarian left wing despots I suppose, then I hold YOU responsible for all death in the name of your sky daddy. PWNED!
First of all it is German law that German citizens MUST declare an afilliation with a particular church. Hitler was only Catholic because he had to declare a religion. Secondly many of the wars you listed had absolutely nothing to do with Christianity, what delusional word do you live in? Thirdly Nazis and Communists have killed close to 200 million if you include abortions. Margret Sanger was an atheist and communist (socialist). Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin, Kim Jong Il.
Devin, you have no idea what you're talking about. Germany is a secular state with strong guarantees of religious freedom. It also has some of the lowest rates of church attendance in Europe.
Also, Hitler was a native of Austria, a majority Roman Catholic country, and came from a Catholic family. His father was a lapsed Catholic and his mother was a practising Catholic.
Your attempt to correlate war and abortion with atheism has no demonstrable basis in fact.
Also there is plenty of science to back Creationism. Try these websites, some are peer reviewed and all have MANY PHDs:
Creation Ministries International (CMI)
Institute For Creation Research
Answers In Genesis
Intelligent Design
The Discovery Institute
Check all those out. Many of them have peer reviewed journals. Many of the Creation Scientists have also had papers published in secular (non Creationists) peer reviewed journals as well.
@Devin82m There has never been a peer reviewed article supporting creation. Not one, ever, you're a pious liar spreading falsehoods in order to show you love your skydaddy. Go ahead link to the abstract of even one, just one peer reviewed paper that posits the creation happened as in Genesis. You fools start with a premise and only accept evidence that supports it, the opposite of science That is why there in not one perr reviewed paper on any of your tripe. NOT A SINGLE SOLITARY ONE!
Cute. But there are plenty of websites and organizations dedicated to PHD level Creation research. Sorry, but your the one lying here. I mean the only thing someone has to do to disprove your ridicous claim is too Google "Peer Reviewed Creation Science" there are 10 or 15 websites I can think of off the top of my head that have peer reviewed material. Also go to Creation Ministries International and look at the "Who We Are" section and you will see viturally all the scientists listed...
@Devin82m And yet vyou still can not link to ONE peer reviewed article. A single article that proves god or intelligent design or the geology of the flood that has been peer reviewed. That is because anyone who submits such claptrap is laughed out of the offices. Self referential sites of like minded Xian apologist don't count, peer reviewed means that it has been vetted by the general scientific community. You lied when you claim peer reviewed support for your God.
Contined... has one or multiple papers published in secular (non Creationists) peer reviewed journals and some of them even teach currently at universities. Also put /creation-scientists after w w w . creation . c o m Also try this after com/ scientists-alive-today-who-accept-the-biblical-account-of-creation That is only one Creationist website. So again the loud mouth atheist tries to talk over everyone with lies so that no one else can get facts or truth out. Sad, how old are you?
You have a few things called a keyboard, mouse, monitor, and computer. The only thing you have to do is go to the websites and look over their material. Then come back to me and let me know what you disagree with. There is no need for me to provide a direct link, there is reams of the proof on those websites. Of course you won't go look and continue to show your blind bias and fingers in the ear attitude. Check out NephlimFree on YouTube he destroys your since on his own.
@Devin82m You are making the positive claim, that there is cretard science that is peer reviewed, it is upon you to provide the evidence. Once again siting the echo chamber of the cretard community don't count.
I already provided links, if anyone wants more just send me a private message. You guys have provided no evidence or proof either. Stop trolling. Also grow up.
Im not going to reply to everything you said because I don't feel the need to defend myself to a person who thinks completely differently than I do.
But I would like to say, YES I do believe in a global flood. If you believe in God(Im assuming you dont) and understand Him than you would know that God doesn't have to be limited to OUR finite understanding. I believe my mind to be the size of a coke can compared to God's being the size of all the oceans. It would be stupid to say that He is....
God went to the trouble of creating a perfectly ordered universe, with the intent that man better himself through the understanding of it.
it would be insulting to ignore what he has written into the very fabric of the universe because the moral guidance he wrote was used as historical fact rather than a series of metaphors.
the litterary world has many interpretations, but maths and science are perfection.
@paix777 But why would you not defend your position when questioned by one who thinks differently from you? Even ignoring that these people are the only ones who would provoke you to defens your stance it still seems stupid not to accept a challange of your core assumptions. If you never rise to these challenges you can never correct or perfect your position. And I'm perfectly fine with the assumption that your god is a magical being, able to operate outside of the natrual order...
Okay,I dont want to spout out all the things running through my head at this moment, I'de like to spend some time thinking about the things you have said because I do want to know that what I believe stands up to scrutiny. Just have patience and I will message you soon
@paix777 O.K. feel free to PM me whenever you get your thoughts straight. That way we won't have to deal with character limits and time constraints. Though I don't suppose there's much chance of our comments being buried on this particular video.
@paix777 *Cringes* At this point in the game I'd say that my 'belief' in the existence of an evolutionary process is irrelevant as all inherient fundamental processies have been observed; Genetic mutation, gene transfer, archeatype branching, dormant ancestorial gene presence, speciation, etc. . I think a better worded question would be "Do you think Evolutionary Theroy has more merit than Spontaneous Generation when describing biological diversity?" and to that my answer would be: Yes of course
@paix777 ... I think It might also help you to know that I do not think of evolution as an alternative to a divine presence. I may not believe in any gods but see no reason to disprove them beyond the definition of scripture. I just appreciate a logical, natrualistic explanation for observations. This is why I also 'subscibe' to such ideas as Heliocentrism and Earth as an oblong spheroid as oposed to a disk encoumpased by a crystal shrowd (Implied suggestion to not take bible stories literally).
@paix777 ... Oh an one more thought: Please don't ASSIMILATE your ideas, conflict is helpful. You learn more reasoning than by rationalizing. And I apologise if that sounded condensending, I assure you I did not mean it as such a comment.
@paix777 ... I just take issue when people try to rationalize tired, refuted or baseless assertions and propositions using pseudo-natrualistic reasoning. For example the ark described in the bible could not have held as many animals as it was said to have held if it was natrual. It doesn't matter how big it was it is just physically impossible so it's stupid to quote the size of the ship. But your god is essentially a wizard so if you say that it happened and happened by magic that's O.K. ...
Ken Ham doesnt EVER claim that the bible is a few weeks old. More like thousands. If your gonna make a dumb "Parody" You might as well get your facts straight. I have been to this museum, read books by Ken Ham, and gone to conferences. Alot of what you state in this video is gross exaggeration. And seriously, have you ever read how big the ark was in the bible?....you need to check your facts before you post very offensive videos like that
@paix777 Way to miss the point there Paix. You see it doesn't matter one claims that the earth is weeks old or thousand years old, the beliefs are both idiotic and worthy of riddicule. Saying 'weeks' was just a joke to make a point. He also sais that it's located in "Never Never Land" but we know that it really isn't but I don't see you complaining about that. And It's not even your failure to get the point that astonishes me, its this quote "You might as well get your facts straight."...
@paix777 ... What facts are these? That the fossil record DOES exist, that speciation is an observed phenomenon, that the dinosaurs became extinct long before early man or that the earth is 4.5 billion years old? Oh no wait those are the facts Ken Ham should 'get straight'. Apearently all we have to do is to make sure that when we make fun of their stupid beliefs we don't blow those stupid beliefs out of proportion...
@paix777 ... And what does this author exaggerate? One thing, the earth being a "few weeks old". They state nothing else that isn't what Ken Ham and most of his collegues profess to believe. And please tell me you don't actually take the flood story literally. Or if you do at least just say that god could have suspended reality and made the volume of the arc bigger than it actually was because you can't reconcile this story without magic. Many have tried and all have failed...
@paix777 ... In the end it's not the suprisingly accurate depictions of the beliefs of select creationists in tihis video that is offensive. Rather it is the ignorance, hypocricy and humorless attitude exlemplified by people like you. If your beliefs don't stand up to scrutiny at least give them leverage over riddicule lest they seem all the more petty.
@TylerBoBylerFyler Im not going to reply to everything you said because I don't feel the need to defend myself to a person who thinks completely differently than I do.
But I would like to say, YES I do believe in a global flood. If you believe in God(Im assuming you dont) and understand Him than you would know that God doesn't have to be limited to OUR finite understanding. I believe my mind to be the size of a coke can compared to God's being the size of all the oceans. It would be stupid ...
@paix777 to say that God is only the small amount of water I can scoop into my little can....that is what I base my beliefs on...and before you bring up things I believe like the global flood you would have to knock out my foundational argument that God is NOT limited to the humans perception of reality. Im not about to tell you that the earth is NOT 4.5 billion years old because I cannot PROVE that is true outside my belief of the bible. Me saying that the earth is only a few thousand years old
@paix777 ...would be pointless unless you share my foundational belief in the Bible. Both of our "facts" are based on different starting points so neither of us would need to argue them until were on the same starting point.
Im sorry I missed the point of the video... what exactly WAS the point of it? because Im still missing it....
that was a rhetorical question, you don't have to answer that because I'm not really interested
@paix777 Do you not understand that biblical stories are NOT fact as they fail the test of being independantly varifiable and supported by physical evidence. Though I do agree that our positions originated from different points, your position was reached upon the back of blind faith and baseless assumption where as mine was bourne of curiosity, inqusitive nature, methodological naturalism and scrutiny. Why on earth would we not need to argue our positions from diferent origins? ...
@paix777 ... The point of this video was to illustrate how idiotic the idea of a Creation Museum is when the creation myth is presented as undeniable truth despite overwhelming evidence contrary to that position. It doesn't matter if you agree with the idea that YOUR preconcieved notions about the nature of the universe are incorrect, just understand that this was the point of the video.
I want to ride the Jesusaur!
mailchibi88 1 week ago
I can't believe this Ken Ham idiot is Australian. How embarrasing for us Aussies. At least now he lives in the U.S. No shortage of religous morons for him to interact with there. I wonder how many lives could have been saved with the $30,000,000 they spent on building a museum of lies.
Skattatudes 1 month ago
Wow this video SUCKS
dougmoerhoffman 5 months ago
@dougmoerhoffman Wow this video is GREAT.
gregrutz 4 months ago
Science( the study of observable fact)and the bible will always be in conflict as one tells the truth and the other is an outdated piece of dribble and i hear your friend Ken is opening up a new exhibit featuring Santa Easter bunny and the tooth fairy.just joking but it would be about as credible as the current exhibit and it's not a museum as a museum is a place where objects of historical artistic or scientific interest are exhibited preserved or studied not made up to suit a hypothetical bul
Tindting 6 months ago
Ken Ham? Maybe he should change his name to Ken SHAM! I mean, I do believe God created everything, BUT, science MUST NOT be ignored! Yes, the universe is 13 bill. yrs. old, No, dinos did NOT live w/ man! (died 65 mill. yrs. ago.). Science & the Bible need NOT be in conflict. Google "Answers in Creation" (NOT to be confused with Ken Sham's "Answers in Genesis"), see the link demonstrating contemporary science and the Bible actually fitt nicely together.
Timbrock1000 7 months ago
LOL!!!! Superb vid ;-)
InHousePussy 7 months ago
ken ham and the bible is great and true
YouAreNotAMonkey 9 months ago
Can you be kind enough to let me know the secret behind this video? Did you actually took time to create it or maybe it a evolve through a long exposure to your camera? Have you got any proove to any of it, I really haven't seen you? Well if I may help a bit : although I haven't seen you I supose after seeing what was created I assumed that there was a creator (an inteligent mind who put all this together - or am wrong?) Spooky stuff :)
bozefilm 11 months ago
@bozefilm Can you be kind enough to read a book or watch the science channel
RomanHistoryNut 4 months ago
"Are you willing to put your logic and reason on hold, really on hold?" NO I AM NOT!
tbdonnelly67 11 months ago
Ken Ham isn't kosher.
RadarKat73080 1 year ago
This is a really bad video. Full of strawmen and lies
simplesamuel 1 year ago
Noah's ark, tower of babel, Jonah and the whale, the talking snake, Christians actually believe this shit.
gavincostin1 1 year ago
@gavincostin1 Just the brainwashed fundy ones. Kind of like the fundy Muslims that think that by blowing themselves up in a supermarket, they'll meet 76 virgins.
jknengr796 1 year ago
@gavincostin1 Just the brainwashed fundy ones. Kind of like the fundy Muslims that think that by blowing themselves up in a supermarket, they'll meet 76 virgins.
jknengr796 1 year ago
Creationism...proof positive that our school system needs work.
davidls11 1 year ago
Very clever!
TheSanityInspector 1 year ago
THEY GOT YOUR ATTENTION I SEE BY MAKING THIS VAGUE VIDEO.
winpeg65 1 year ago
lol lol lol awsome and sad because it's true.
crockoduckevolved 1 year ago
Also Everyone check out NeplimFree's videos on YouTube they blow the un-scientific evolutionists out of the water with actual science.
Devin82m 1 year ago
@Devin82m You mean the Nephy who maintains that the Earth doesn't rotate on it's axis? The fool that thinks the entire universe turns around Jerusalem and we stand motionless at its center? The Nephy who says that water ejected from the Earth's oceans froze in space and created the craters on the moon? The man who survives by leeching off a disabled woman and claims to be an expert in astrophysics, geology, biology and philology (when the meant to say phylogeny, that was a classic). That moron?
disrxt 1 year ago
@disrxt
Are you 5 years old? I mean really? He gave a video response to the illegal claims that he is muching off and abusing his friends (who is not mentally challenged). Also He never claimed the earth stands still, nor does he claim the universe revolves around Jerusalem... Try watching the videos again. Also why are you so militant? I mean what purpose do you have in life, why not allow people to believe in God? I mean atheist have caused more harm and death than Christians. Proven fact.
Devin82m 1 year ago
@Devin82m The Crusades, the Inquisition, Manifest Destiny, the Conquistadors, the Thirty Years War, the Hundred Years War, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the British Rape of India, the Opium Wars, African Slavery, just to name a few of the atrocities committed by 'loving' Christians. Oh yeah, and Hitler was a Catholic! You want to hold atheist responsible for the crimes of totalitarian left wing despots I suppose, then I hold YOU responsible for all death in the name of your sky daddy. PWNED!
disrxt 1 year ago
@disrxt
First of all it is German law that German citizens MUST declare an afilliation with a particular church. Hitler was only Catholic because he had to declare a religion. Secondly many of the wars you listed had absolutely nothing to do with Christianity, what delusional word do you live in? Thirdly Nazis and Communists have killed close to 200 million if you include abortions. Margret Sanger was an atheist and communist (socialist). Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin, Kim Jong Il.
Devin82m 1 year ago
Comment removed
ancientwell 1 year ago
@Devin82m
Devin, you have no idea what you're talking about. Germany is a secular state with strong guarantees of religious freedom. It also has some of the lowest rates of church attendance in Europe.
Also, Hitler was a native of Austria, a majority Roman Catholic country, and came from a Catholic family. His father was a lapsed Catholic and his mother was a practising Catholic.
Your attempt to correlate war and abortion with atheism has no demonstrable basis in fact.
ancientwell 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video is so far off.
Also there is plenty of science to back Creationism. Try these websites, some are peer reviewed and all have MANY PHDs:
Creation Ministries International (CMI)
Institute For Creation Research
Answers In Genesis
Intelligent Design
The Discovery Institute
Check all those out. Many of them have peer reviewed journals. Many of the Creation Scientists have also had papers published in secular (non Creationists) peer reviewed journals as well.
Devin82m 1 year ago
@Devin82m There has never been a peer reviewed article supporting creation. Not one, ever, you're a pious liar spreading falsehoods in order to show you love your skydaddy. Go ahead link to the abstract of even one, just one peer reviewed paper that posits the creation happened as in Genesis. You fools start with a premise and only accept evidence that supports it, the opposite of science That is why there in not one perr reviewed paper on any of your tripe. NOT A SINGLE SOLITARY ONE!
disrxt 1 year ago
@disrxt
Cute. But there are plenty of websites and organizations dedicated to PHD level Creation research. Sorry, but your the one lying here. I mean the only thing someone has to do to disprove your ridicous claim is too Google "Peer Reviewed Creation Science" there are 10 or 15 websites I can think of off the top of my head that have peer reviewed material. Also go to Creation Ministries International and look at the "Who We Are" section and you will see viturally all the scientists listed...
Devin82m 1 year ago
@Devin82m And yet vyou still can not link to ONE peer reviewed article. A single article that proves god or intelligent design or the geology of the flood that has been peer reviewed. That is because anyone who submits such claptrap is laughed out of the offices. Self referential sites of like minded Xian apologist don't count, peer reviewed means that it has been vetted by the general scientific community. You lied when you claim peer reviewed support for your God.
disrxt 1 year ago
@disrxt
Contined... has one or multiple papers published in secular (non Creationists) peer reviewed journals and some of them even teach currently at universities. Also put /creation-scientists after w w w . creation . c o m Also try this after com/ scientists-alive-today-who-accept-the-biblical-account-of-creation That is only one Creationist website. So again the loud mouth atheist tries to talk over everyone with lies so that no one else can get facts or truth out. Sad, how old are you?
Devin82m 1 year ago
@Devin82m Still wating for that Earth shaking link to a single peer reviewed article.
disrxt 1 year ago
@disrxt
You have a few things called a keyboard, mouse, monitor, and computer. The only thing you have to do is go to the websites and look over their material. Then come back to me and let me know what you disagree with. There is no need for me to provide a direct link, there is reams of the proof on those websites. Of course you won't go look and continue to show your blind bias and fingers in the ear attitude. Check out NephlimFree on YouTube he destroys your since on his own.
Devin82m 1 year ago
@Devin82m You are making the positive claim, that there is cretard science that is peer reviewed, it is upon you to provide the evidence. Once again siting the echo chamber of the cretard community don't count.
disrxt 1 year ago
@disrxt
I already provided links, if anyone wants more just send me a private message. You guys have provided no evidence or proof either. Stop trolling. Also grow up.
Devin82m 1 year ago
@Devin82m Search proof of evolution There is enough proof of it right here on Youtube.
gregrutz 1 year ago
: )
perydwyn 1 year ago
Im not going to reply to everything you said because I don't feel the need to defend myself to a person who thinks completely differently than I do.
But I would like to say, YES I do believe in a global flood. If you believe in God(Im assuming you dont) and understand Him than you would know that God doesn't have to be limited to OUR finite understanding. I believe my mind to be the size of a coke can compared to God's being the size of all the oceans. It would be stupid to say that He is....
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777
God went to the trouble of creating a perfectly ordered universe, with the intent that man better himself through the understanding of it.
it would be insulting to ignore what he has written into the very fabric of the universe because the moral guidance he wrote was used as historical fact rather than a series of metaphors.
the litterary world has many interpretations, but maths and science are perfection.
foxmcloud555 1 year ago
@paix777 But why would you not defend your position when questioned by one who thinks differently from you? Even ignoring that these people are the only ones who would provoke you to defens your stance it still seems stupid not to accept a challange of your core assumptions. If you never rise to these challenges you can never correct or perfect your position. And I'm perfectly fine with the assumption that your god is a magical being, able to operate outside of the natrual order...
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@TylerBoBylerFyler
Okay,I dont want to spout out all the things running through my head at this moment, I'de like to spend some time thinking about the things you have said because I do want to know that what I believe stands up to scrutiny. Just have patience and I will message you soon
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777 O.K. feel free to PM me whenever you get your thoughts straight. That way we won't have to deal with character limits and time constraints. Though I don't suppose there's much chance of our comments being buried on this particular video.
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@TylerBoBylerFyler
Okay thanks. While Im assimilating my thoughts, It would help me to know, do you believe in evolution?
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777 *Cringes* At this point in the game I'd say that my 'belief' in the existence of an evolutionary process is irrelevant as all inherient fundamental processies have been observed; Genetic mutation, gene transfer, archeatype branching, dormant ancestorial gene presence, speciation, etc. . I think a better worded question would be "Do you think Evolutionary Theroy has more merit than Spontaneous Generation when describing biological diversity?" and to that my answer would be: Yes of course
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@TylerBoBylerFyler Okay well I will strike my original question if you wish but I also wish to strike the way you worded it.
My question would be: Do you think Evolutionary Theory is more probable than creation by a divine being.
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777 Do you want to do this here or in a PM?
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@paix777 ... I think It might also help you to know that I do not think of evolution as an alternative to a divine presence. I may not believe in any gods but see no reason to disprove them beyond the definition of scripture. I just appreciate a logical, natrualistic explanation for observations. This is why I also 'subscibe' to such ideas as Heliocentrism and Earth as an oblong spheroid as oposed to a disk encoumpased by a crystal shrowd (Implied suggestion to not take bible stories literally).
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@paix777 ... Oh an one more thought: Please don't ASSIMILATE your ideas, conflict is helpful. You learn more reasoning than by rationalizing. And I apologise if that sounded condensending, I assure you I did not mean it as such a comment.
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@TylerBoBylerFyler
PM
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777 ... I just take issue when people try to rationalize tired, refuted or baseless assertions and propositions using pseudo-natrualistic reasoning. For example the ark described in the bible could not have held as many animals as it was said to have held if it was natrual. It doesn't matter how big it was it is just physically impossible so it's stupid to quote the size of the ship. But your god is essentially a wizard so if you say that it happened and happened by magic that's O.K. ...
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@paix777 ... That position might not have any scientific value but at least magical methods cannot be touched by the scientific method.
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
Wow this thing is so ridiculous. First of all
Ken Ham doesnt EVER claim that the bible is a few weeks old. More like thousands. If your gonna make a dumb "Parody" You might as well get your facts straight. I have been to this museum, read books by Ken Ham, and gone to conferences. Alot of what you state in this video is gross exaggeration. And seriously, have you ever read how big the ark was in the bible?....you need to check your facts before you post very offensive videos like that
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777 Way to miss the point there Paix. You see it doesn't matter one claims that the earth is weeks old or thousand years old, the beliefs are both idiotic and worthy of riddicule. Saying 'weeks' was just a joke to make a point. He also sais that it's located in "Never Never Land" but we know that it really isn't but I don't see you complaining about that. And It's not even your failure to get the point that astonishes me, its this quote "You might as well get your facts straight."...
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@paix777 ... What facts are these? That the fossil record DOES exist, that speciation is an observed phenomenon, that the dinosaurs became extinct long before early man or that the earth is 4.5 billion years old? Oh no wait those are the facts Ken Ham should 'get straight'. Apearently all we have to do is to make sure that when we make fun of their stupid beliefs we don't blow those stupid beliefs out of proportion...
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@paix777 ... And what does this author exaggerate? One thing, the earth being a "few weeks old". They state nothing else that isn't what Ken Ham and most of his collegues profess to believe. And please tell me you don't actually take the flood story literally. Or if you do at least just say that god could have suspended reality and made the volume of the arc bigger than it actually was because you can't reconcile this story without magic. Many have tried and all have failed...
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@paix777 ... In the end it's not the suprisingly accurate depictions of the beliefs of select creationists in tihis video that is offensive. Rather it is the ignorance, hypocricy and humorless attitude exlemplified by people like you. If your beliefs don't stand up to scrutiny at least give them leverage over riddicule lest they seem all the more petty.
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@TylerBoBylerFyler Im not going to reply to everything you said because I don't feel the need to defend myself to a person who thinks completely differently than I do.
But I would like to say, YES I do believe in a global flood. If you believe in God(Im assuming you dont) and understand Him than you would know that God doesn't have to be limited to OUR finite understanding. I believe my mind to be the size of a coke can compared to God's being the size of all the oceans. It would be stupid ...
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777 to say that God is only the small amount of water I can scoop into my little can....that is what I base my beliefs on...and before you bring up things I believe like the global flood you would have to knock out my foundational argument that God is NOT limited to the humans perception of reality. Im not about to tell you that the earth is NOT 4.5 billion years old because I cannot PROVE that is true outside my belief of the bible. Me saying that the earth is only a few thousand years old
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777 ...would be pointless unless you share my foundational belief in the Bible. Both of our "facts" are based on different starting points so neither of us would need to argue them until were on the same starting point.
Im sorry I missed the point of the video... what exactly WAS the point of it? because Im still missing it....
that was a rhetorical question, you don't have to answer that because I'm not really interested
paix777 1 year ago
@paix777 Do you not understand that biblical stories are NOT fact as they fail the test of being independantly varifiable and supported by physical evidence. Though I do agree that our positions originated from different points, your position was reached upon the back of blind faith and baseless assumption where as mine was bourne of curiosity, inqusitive nature, methodological naturalism and scrutiny. Why on earth would we not need to argue our positions from diferent origins? ...
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
@paix777 ... The point of this video was to illustrate how idiotic the idea of a Creation Museum is when the creation myth is presented as undeniable truth despite overwhelming evidence contrary to that position. It doesn't matter if you agree with the idea that YOUR preconcieved notions about the nature of the universe are incorrect, just understand that this was the point of the video.
TylerBoBylerFyler 1 year ago
What's the point of ridiculing the museum?
daveyjazz72 2 years ago
I agree, why would you ridicule this museum? If someone wants to ridicule it they should at least have facts against it.
CWSnyder10 1 year ago