The difference between this and 911, is that 1.) if fell from the bottom down, NOT top down. So if fell like wtc7, NOT 1&2. 2nd.) The top was not exploding out with huge nuclear dust cloud. Yes ADM "Atomic Demolition Munitions" very low yield of < 100m were used on 911. ADM's are routinely used in canal building and coal mining. Not new technology. 3.) No molten steel 6 months after here, that is because there is no radioactive decay in this situation. Cheers.
@Tracid87 Except it doesn't look like it because the world trade center was never fitted with explosives, they collapsed because of jet fuel. I guess you learned something from me today.
@TheChristmasFan You think jet fuel didnt burn off right after the impact I mean look at the explosion that was massive on both buildings people on the lower levels may have escaped fire didnt kill them.
actually if u watch independent witness videos not news there is explosive flashes ,explosions were heard by many many ,including firemen and police ,and janitors in the basements so RBAWilcox take your 23 stupid shrill mates and stick those thumbs up your arses
@GW8941 Not as loud and as prominent as this. Reporters on the scene said they heard rumbling, not explosions and not nearly as many as this. Stop with your dumbass conspiracies and look at the evidence. The building started to collapse exactly where the planes hit. Can you explain that? Were the people flying them so skilled that they knew exactly where to fly them so that the explosives, placed months before, would be right below the impact points?
@GW8941 Not as loud and as prominent as this. Reporters on the scene said they heard rumbling, not explosions and not nearly as many as this. Stop with your dumb ass conspiracies and look at the evidence. The building started to collapse exactly where the planes hit. Can you explain that? Were the people flying them so skilled that they knew exactly where to fly them so that the explosives, placed months before, would be right below the impact points?
Cracks me up when the conspiracy theorists writes their dumb ass conclusions. They jot down a couple of screwy ideas, beat off, write a couple more, beat off, finish writing and then go give their boyfriends a bj.
@jpyz450f explosions are common in fires. Electrical transformers explode, pressurized containers explode, pipes burst, floors partially collapse, elevators fall, fires in WTC5 would set off rounds, windows break, cars explode, even the sounds of bodies sounded like explosions. and over half of the eyewitnesses are referring to the collapse of the building. they described it as "like an explosion" but explosions were heard long before and even after collapse. Which is not a trademark of a CD.
The towers and WTC7 were not "conventional" demolitions,but they were obviously demolitions.A retarded person could look at building 7 and know what it is. I suppose that same retarded person could look at the towers and say-"duh, the planes hit buildings,buildings fall down" but those of us with common sense and at least basic knowledge in high school physics know better.So do the thousands of architects and engineers with AE911truth who call BS on the official NIST reports on the "collapses".
Explosions are not rare in fires in fact they should be expected: Electrical transformers explode, pressurized containers explode, elevators periodically fall, pipes burst, diesel engines in WTC7 explode, vehicles explode after paper set the ablaze. They were heard long before and even after the collapse, controlled demolitions admit a sequence of explosions in the seconds before collapse, which would have been heard and seen by every camera within a mile, which did not happen
Wow, check it out, that looks exactly like the twin towers falling down on 9/11!!.same amount of time too. Must be a coincidence of course, because we all know , because we've been told, that the twin towers fell by jet-fuel fires
The whole "loud explosion sounds could be heard before the collapse" can be many things, you do realise pressure can cause such noises right? Hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and concrete where above the weakened structure, it is more than likely these noises could of been the pressure waves created as the structure began to fail.
@CASTRER The WTC had been evacuated and gone under demolition construction like getting rid of pipes, and eletrical stuff. Then demolition workers went in and took about a year and a half to properly rig 3 towers with explosives. Then on the explosion a sequence of loud explosions were heard in the seconds before collapse along with bright flashes. Then The building collapsed while many explosions were being heard and seen.
No I don't think the WTC had these characteristics.
@RBAWilcox read some of John McMurtry's work and watch loose change or engineers for 911 truth. ps I would like to know what qualifications you have that would validate your opinion ? it sounds like you think what major media outlets told you to think;
@kingofkensington7110 why would i believe the guys from loose change. none of them have college educations and all they do is take quotes out of context to support their claim. in fact the guy narrating loose change started out just writing a little story about 9/11 being a conspiracy, but along the way he decided to call it a true story for some reason. and the researcher believes every conspiracy in the book. how about you tell me why u think its a conspiracy
@RBAWilcox numerous eye-witness accounts and video evidence support claims of seeing such explosions before the controlled demolition of the WTC occurred. Only an idiot would think an airplane hitting one of these buildings could have brought it down...a clearly ignorant idiot. The only thing even more preposterous is the idea that a plane hit the pentagon during this clearly self-inflicted wound to justify a still illegal war in Iraq. Seriously think for yourself on this one...its right there
@rmwill08 explosions are common in fires, pressurized containers, electrical transformers,pipes bursting. CDs have a quick sequence of explosions in the seconds before the collapse of the structure, they don't have random explosions here and there. Explosions were heard even after And It wasn't soley the plane that brought it down, your making straw man arguments. It was a combination of the way the building was constructed, the plane impact, and the ensuing fires that brought down the towers.
@RBAWilcox ...there are previous cases of planes hitting weaker buildings without any collapse such as we witnessed at WTC. The building would not have fallen like that from the causes you describe. It was clearly the result of a CD, the way the building fell is evidence of that. The plane and the fuel it was carrying would not have caused that type of collapse. Perhaps someone with no understanding of how these buildings were built could be duped as you so obviously are..not me though.
@rmwill08 No, you obviously don't know how those towers were built, your comparing it with planes hitting other buildings without realizing the fact that the towers were uniquely built. The towers were built with a tube and tube system, there was no concrete encasing the core or trusses. Meaning the fires could easily weaken the steel. And the way the tower fell proves there was no demolition actually. It would be impossible to plant explosives. the falling top section proves it
@RBAWilcox The buildings were built to withstand several planes hitting it. There was plenty of time in the months leading up to this for explosives to have been planted...This was planned, poorly, but good enough to convince the ignorant masses. Every "attack" that day was fabricated. The stories don't add up, what about the explosions AT THE BASE of the towers? I am not trying to just introduce new info to muddy the waters. Explain why Bldg 7 collapsed without any plane crashing into it.
@rmwill08 You have no source to prove that the WTC could withstand several plane impacts, and there you go again, I never said the plane alone brought down the towers. And you mean to tell me that The government managed to plant enough explosives into 3 different buildings which could still work perfectly after plane impact without being seen by the thousands who worked in those towers or by the additional thousands of people who walked through the lobby each day
@rmwill08 Your argument is invalid, to cause damaged to the base of the towers would make no sense as the tower started collapsing from the top, not the base, and Your comparison with the empire state building is also invalid as the ESB was hit by significantly smaller and slower plane than the 767s that hit the WTC. also the ESB was constructed differently with concrete encased interior columns, something the WTC did not have. and WTC 7 was heavily damaged by debris and left to burn for 7 hours
@xcited4vids just a few minor scratches eh? According to the firefighters the building had 1/4th of its base scooped out, and a large vertical gash on the center bottom going up 10 floors, and then it burned for 7 hours. So....I guess that would be a very big scratch...No I think thats major damage.....And what about the deutsche bank building...not really a few scratches there either. The only reason that didn't collapse was because it didn't catch on fire. Your argument is invalid
@RBAWilcox buildings have burned for more than 24 hours and still not collapse. And the way that building7 went down shows that it was brought down by explosives. Inside job, period!!
@mammaknullaren88 actually the way the building went down actually proves there was no demolition, There was no ejection of debris or a sequence of explosions heard before collapse. Also Building 7 was heavily damaged by debris from the collapse of the North tower. The building only had a 2 hour fire proofing and had a unique structural design in which every floor above floor 7 was supported by 3 main trusses. Then failure of those trusses lead to the collapse of the building.
@mammaknullaren88 if you believe that the fires in WTC7 were small based on early pictures of the north side then you are purely mistaken. The firefighters on the scene reported that Building 7 was on fire from the bottom floor to the top floor. The entire building was on fire, all 47 stories were in flames based on accounts by every firefighter on the scene. conspiracy theorists like to show pictures from the north side early in the day when the fires were significantly smaller.
@rmwill08 In 1945 a B-25 bomber crashed into the Empire State building on the 78th floor....no collapse of the structure...The WTC buildings were of a class designed to withstand the impact of several planes. The buildings had no gas lines in them...Of course, none of these arguments even need to made after the obvious lie the government put out about The Pentagon being hit by a plane...This is not a straw man argument, it illustrates the inconsistency of the government as a information source.
@RBAWilcox obviously, the people who wanted the twin towers taken down knew that they had to make the demolition believable. So it was a top down demolition, to give the appearance that the airplanes were the cause of the collapse. Google Barry Jennings.
@mammaknullaren88 in every photo and video of the collapse the debris are falling faster than the ash cloud, which was also falling faster than the building, this proves the buildings were falling well below free fall speed.
What?! I thought the only bomb in the world was black, round and had a fuse that you light with a match.. is that not so?
I had no idea there where DIFFERENT kinds of explosives.. and that TECHNOLOGY improves over time..
But i know that the general public get knowledge about, and access to all new weapons, explosives and other technology that is invented straight away.. so nothing i have not heard about can be used in any way, ever..
@RBAWilcox ..the same question I would ask you...A blind person does not see what is not there, but rather does not see what is there. Since the flashes WERE there and YOU didn't see them; YOU are the blind person. When somebody (in this case most of the media and some of the government) lies to you, everything they say from that point on is suspect. Everything the media/government puts out must be thoroughly examined as so many lies have been pushed on us in the past.
@Spelfr explosions are not rare in fires, in fact they should be expected. pressurized containers, electrical transformers explode, pipes burst, elevators fall, windows are broken, rounds are setoff. demolitions admit a sequence of booms in the seconds before collapse. not random explosions.
and the ''flashes'' only appear as waves of dust and don't start until after the collapse has started, but this is a result of compressed air.
and for the pentagon, well that was hit by flight 77
@RBAWilcox There was some boom before the collapse. Sound travels relatively slowly but if you watch some videos which are filmed from the street below, it looks like the sounds comes first and then the tower collapses, but maybe it was just that some metal cracked, made really big sound and it took about second or two when gravity started to pull the tower down, and maybe wtc tower could stand up for a second after the towers core breaks down if some small pillars can support it
@isokessu your previous statement """""""""it looks like the sound comes first and then the tower collapses."""""""" is completely wrong. First of all you can't see sound waves, so by saying it looks like sound comes first is completely wrong. And in none of the videos are explosions seen or heard in the collapse. In demolition videos like these explosions are heard miles away, and in none of the videos of the WTC collapse are explosions heard.
@RBAWilcox see the sound waves? I never said that the sound came from some giant explosion what could made visible sound wave. There was some sound just before collapse and it came from the tower what collapsed, but of course the biggest sound came from the collapse itself when everybody started cracking in tiny pieces and of course all that was heard outside New York and I didn't say word "explosion" earlier. Btw I've seen windows shaking from fireworks which were shot 10 miles away.
@isokessu There is no such thing as a visible sound wave, humans can't see sound, not even in an explosion. What your talking about is a condensation ring that is created after a the sound barrier is broken in a sonic boom, anything that goes faster than this is faster than sound. The Towers did not fall fast enough to break the sound barrier and therefor couldn't have created a condensation ring. Not even a controlled demolition can do that. Therefor you are lying about seeing sound waves.
@RBAWilcox. Sorry but I think you understood wrong my comment and I understood your comment wrong. I didn't mean that somebody could actually "see" sound and my first language is not English but at least in Finnish even blind guy can say that something "looks" like something, even though he can't see it. I meant that you can h e a r the sound first before s e e i n g the collapse in some video, I can't find that video right now to show it but I'm sure it's somewhere on YouTube and other sites.
@isokessu what are you talking about in every single video the sound starts after the collapse and the delay depends on the distance from the towers. In no video is sound heard before collapse, also you are only talking about youtube videos, which could easily be an audio screw up. Unlike you I was actually in New york on 9/11. Believe everyone in New york when they say sound came after the towers started collapsing
Hmm, i´m reading out of context here, but WTC didnt collapse this way, it collapsed from top to bottom, explaining why nothing was heard at the base. Sorry if i´m out of talking out of context :)
@RBAWilcox - well, we really don't know that now, since all the television footage was altered. Some of it was pre-fab CGI animation, stuck into the data stream to simulate "real time" coverage. There were MASSIVE craters in the plaza and the streets before the collapses began. There have been hidden by the media until now.
YouTube user CNN911Fakes - you will be blown away (pardon the pun)
@RBAWilcox you can see some explosions, but not that obvious (because they didnt want it to be THAT obvious, duh). and there WERE many people commenting they heard BOOMS. you can see in videos about it.
@AgathaBeso123 explosions are extremely common in fires, electrical transformers explode copy machines and pressurized containers explode, pipes bursts, vehicles explode after paper set them ablaze, Floors partially collapse, even the sounds of bodies sounded like explosions. As loud as the collapse was, it sounded nothing like an actual controlled demolition. but you'd rather believe that all accounts of explosions meant the use of bombs, even when explosions were heard long after the collapse
@bwoods00 no it does not, those bright flashes would have needed to be accompanied by loud explosions before the collapse. The flashes scene during collapse were most likely reflections of broken glass and failing electrical appliances within the building. Because there is no sequence of explosions in the seconds before collapse the world trade center complex was not brought down by controlled demolition, but by the combination of impact and fires which caused the columns to bow inward.
@RBAWilcox watch the new add that the families have released in new york. best quality video i have seen yet or wtc7's collapse. you can see many flashes similar to this one. just my opinion though.
@bwoods00 did you not read my full comment. Those flashes were most likely electrical appliances failing or less likely reflections of broken glass. In a demolition bright flashes would have been accompanied by loud explosions in the seconds before the collapse. A demolition also causes a near free fall speed. however World trade center 7 collapsed in 20 seconds starting with the collapse of the east penthouse when free speed would be 6 seconds
@RBAWilcox i did read your full comment and i respect you opinion that they were "most likely" reflections of broken glass but like all other "truthers" i don't agree with your take. people can argue about the collapse of this building and will for years to come, but at the end of the day the most damming pieces of evidence was that it was left out of the 911 commission report. that's pretty ridiculous. wouldn't you agree with that? i think that it speaks volumes.
@bwoods00 I said reflections were less likely, rather the flashes were electrical appliances failing.
World trade center 7 is left out of the 9/11 commission because it's not an engineering report. The 9/11 commission was to investigate why the attacks occurred and to provide ideas to prevent future attacks. Building 7 wasn't the target of terrorism, rather it was destroyed from falling debris and fire. Several other buildings were also destroyed and the commission doesn't mention them either.
9/11 wasn't a controlled demolition. This building collapsed into its footprint, while the wtc had debris flying all over the place. It also collapsed slightly slower than this.
This was a terrorist attack by goatherders who hate our freedom. You can clearly see the commercial airliner hit the building. It was the fuel that weakened the steel. They also found a boxcutter in the debris and a picture of Muhammad Ali in the street below. Clear proof that it was goatherders who are fanatic boxing fans. We need a security organization to protect our, lets call it mortgageland, from these evil doers. Lets hire some Israeli zionists to run it. How about Steven Spielberg? GOY!
@hishyhafez Indeed, they are everything you never were and never will be. Israel has a history and culture thousands of years old, they have a functioning, developing society.The more they succeed and progress, the more your hatred intensifies. While we are evolving and advancing in all areas,you are consumed and busy with hatred and terrorism. Who's the one thats fucked ? Wake up !
@angstotheclown uummm you realize you see secondaryt explosins going up through the building which means it was done by a construction crew you are cleary a fucking dumbass
LOOKS AND SOUNDS LIKE 911..remember the Firemen using the payphone...Those were explosion cracks, just like a whip... 911 STILL AND INSIDE Job and Cheney, bush, rumsfeld and the other pentagon warmongers are to blame.
@undergirl0714 "if you look good enough you can see flashes" lol did you actually see this video? its almost impossible to miss those flashes... you can be miles away and you could see them. and for a big tower like the WTC you HAD too see tons of them!! but we didnt
@undergirl0714 lol "and if you look good enough you can see flashes" i think that flashes are easy to see even if i am far away and a controlled demolition can be heard like km away.... you just fail at this dude
@joshkund um just to know, where do you see al those flash and explosions in 9/11? to take two huge towers you need tons and tons of tnt or whatever its use...
I wonder if modern buildings are actually designed with safe demolition in mind and have instructions with the plans where to place the explosives, if not might be a good idea.
Will everybody STU about 9/11?! God, I know it was the worst thing that could've happened to the US, but that was 10 years ago. GET OVER IT!!!
MrAceBarber1994 1 month ago
911
nosterify 1 month ago
The difference between this and 911, is that 1.) if fell from the bottom down, NOT top down. So if fell like wtc7, NOT 1&2. 2nd.) The top was not exploding out with huge nuclear dust cloud. Yes ADM "Atomic Demolition Munitions" very low yield of < 100m were used on 911. ADM's are routinely used in canal building and coal mining. Not new technology. 3.) No molten steel 6 months after here, that is because there is no radioactive decay in this situation. Cheers.
tropophyte 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
proof that 9/11 was an inside job
DaScrewUp 2 months ago
WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT ISRAEL? This is a video about explosions, for god's sake!
eruption257 4 months ago 8
@eruption257 its funny cause your name is ERUPTION 257
pumishumi 4 months ago
cool :D watch 9/11 the towers looks like this :)
very cool
Tracid87 4 months ago
@Tracid87 Except it doesn't look like it because the world trade center was never fitted with explosives, they collapsed because of jet fuel. I guess you learned something from me today.
TheChristmasFan 3 months ago
@TheChristmasFan jet fuel causes buildings to collapse?? so if I pour jet fuel around my house it will spontaneously collapse?
TrueArsenic 3 months ago
@TrueArsenic Burning jet fuel
TheChristmasFan 3 months ago
@TheChristmasFan
for me it looks like that explosions on the side of the towers.
and explosive on the ground.
I trust my eyes and my ears :)
And i dont think that jet fuel can collapse 2 towers in 10 seconds to the ground. think about it.
Tracid87 3 months ago 2
@Tracid87 It did not take 10 seconds for jet fuel to take down the building, it took nearly three hours
TheChristmasFan 3 months ago
@TheChristmasFan
the collapse did. not the fire dude. u know what i mean
Tracid87 3 months ago
@TheChristmasFan not building 7 and it took under 2 hours for the first twin then under 1 for the second!
sh9683 3 months ago
@TheChristmasFan You think jet fuel didnt burn off right after the impact I mean look at the explosion that was massive on both buildings people on the lower levels may have escaped fire didnt kill them.
BimmerM5e39 3 months ago
Amerikans r ediot.
gardenofarcane 4 months ago
@gardenofarcane I agree! And I'm an American
MsAgnosticatheist 4 months ago
@RBAWilcox THIS GUY IS A CLOWN SUKS CIA COCK AL DAY
GW8941 5 months ago
actually if u watch independent witness videos not news there is explosive flashes ,explosions were heard by many many ,including firemen and police ,and janitors in the basements so RBAWilcox take your 23 stupid shrill mates and stick those thumbs up your arses
GW8941 5 months ago
@GW8941 Not as loud and as prominent as this. Reporters on the scene said they heard rumbling, not explosions and not nearly as many as this. Stop with your dumbass conspiracies and look at the evidence. The building started to collapse exactly where the planes hit. Can you explain that? Were the people flying them so skilled that they knew exactly where to fly them so that the explosives, placed months before, would be right below the impact points?
a021692 4 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@GW8941 Not as loud and as prominent as this. Reporters on the scene said they heard rumbling, not explosions and not nearly as many as this. Stop with your dumb ass conspiracies and look at the evidence. The building started to collapse exactly where the planes hit. Can you explain that? Were the people flying them so skilled that they knew exactly where to fly them so that the explosives, placed months before, would be right below the impact points?
a021692 4 months ago
Kind of ironic, looks exactly how the World Trade Towers went down.
zzarcade 5 months ago
how did I guess the comments section was all going to be about 9/11 ¬¬
I must be psychic.
DrPracticleHat 5 months ago
WTC PREPARING ?
windatekili 6 months ago
Cracks me up when the conspiracy theorists writes their dumb ass conclusions. They jot down a couple of screwy ideas, beat off, write a couple more, beat off, finish writing and then go give their boyfriends a bj.
oldfart387 6 months ago
@oldfart387 y you here u then stupid cunt ,i think you take it up the arse ,in fact i no you do .Bush was the first to fuck ya .your a fail .....
GW8941 5 months ago
@GW8941
The sentence structure and language proves my point. Now, go back yo bed your boyfriend wants that tea-baggy thing you do.
oldfart387 5 months ago
@oldfart387 y dont u suk my dick coz u obviously a little bitch.........WORD!
GW8941 4 months ago
911 was a inside job an you are blind if you dont think so.
jpyz450f 6 months ago
RBAWilcox actually there are many Eyewitness acounts saying that there were loud explosions. you are a sheep.
jpyz450f 6 months ago
@jpyz450f explosions are common in fires. Electrical transformers explode, pressurized containers explode, pipes burst, floors partially collapse, elevators fall, fires in WTC5 would set off rounds, windows break, cars explode, even the sounds of bodies sounded like explosions. and over half of the eyewitnesses are referring to the collapse of the building. they described it as "like an explosion" but explosions were heard long before and even after collapse. Which is not a trademark of a CD.
RBAWilcox 6 months ago
wow dosnt that look alot like the world trade buildings hmmmn.
jpyz450f 6 months ago
The towers and WTC7 were not "conventional" demolitions,but they were obviously demolitions.A retarded person could look at building 7 and know what it is. I suppose that same retarded person could look at the towers and say-"duh, the planes hit buildings,buildings fall down" but those of us with common sense and at least basic knowledge in high school physics know better.So do the thousands of architects and engineers with AE911truth who call BS on the official NIST reports on the "collapses".
newjack31622 6 months ago
Isn't it sad the same person has the two highest rated comments?
TrickyOne3 6 months ago
9/11
vladabih 6 months ago
WTC was cooler!
goldbullet50 6 months ago
NOT EVRYTHING HAS TO LOOK LIKE 9/11
joedawg112 6 months ago
Nine eleven came to Texas.....
ghost255932 6 months ago
Holy SHit !!! i fart and this shit happens !!!
TowMater603 7 months ago
This video is the Texas building, former Continental National Bank in Fort Worth Texas
bryanrrickena 7 months ago
I thought there were two towers, I only see one.
MrDenizen 7 months ago
@MrDenizen these aren't the twin towers
KTH568 7 months ago
Explosions are not rare in fires in fact they should be expected: Electrical transformers explode, pressurized containers explode, elevators periodically fall, pipes burst, diesel engines in WTC7 explode, vehicles explode after paper set the ablaze. They were heard long before and even after the collapse, controlled demolitions admit a sequence of explosions in the seconds before collapse, which would have been heard and seen by every camera within a mile, which did not happen
RBAWilcox 7 months ago
really cool i love explosions. from where did you record the vid from a helicopter? :O
aramdilboyan 7 months ago
No room for error bringing that baby down!
saxonmor 8 months ago
That wasn't a demolish! Chuck Norris was just trying to find a bank!
xXtornadoEPICfaceXx 8 months ago
shit!!! I left my iphone in there!
Andersng1 8 months ago
Who's got homework?
l2pks4f3rs 8 months ago
9/11 was bad! (everyone cheers)
ClassicHorrorDB 8 months ago
Great
oo7animal 8 months ago
So here it was where Osama has been hiding all the time. He was working.
princeeugen 8 months ago
WTC comment= SHUT THE FUCK UP
tman383 8 months ago
There seems something more remarkable in the demolition of these buildings, than the building of them!
mrpolaroid123 8 months ago
eh wtc attacked by plane or bomb ?
supergilaz 8 months ago
This proves that the 9/11 was rigged by the USA's government!!!!
(Now start the pointless internet fight.)
TheFinlandnator 9 months ago
CooL! O.O
RoniRotta94 9 months ago
The best part was when the building fell down
DzertHD 9 months ago
Apparently it was unbelievable.
matthewung 9 months ago 12
Now that was freaking cool!
englishrose666 10 months ago
Wow, check it out, that looks exactly like the twin towers falling down on 9/11!!.same amount of time too. Must be a coincidence of course, because we all know , because we've been told, that the twin towers fell by jet-fuel fires
noonesflower 10 months ago
The whole "loud explosion sounds could be heard before the collapse" can be many things, you do realise pressure can cause such noises right? Hundreds of thousands of tons of steel and concrete where above the weakened structure, it is more than likely these noises could of been the pressure waves created as the structure began to fail.
ohgoditsjames94 10 months ago
DID A PLANE HIT IT ??
kingofkensington7110 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks like 9/11 to me too...
jtvanheck 11 months ago
Wow that looked just like building world trade building 7
TheMangese 11 months ago
what's so UNBELIEVABLE? the building was loaded with explosives b/c it was going to be demolished!!!
gwenzini 11 months ago
@gwenzini its unbelievable cus of such a big building and it didnt even touch the buildings around it for being how close they were
sbg22sf4 11 months ago
Looks like 9/11 to me...
jenleex 1 year ago 2
cameraman shit his pants when it started to explode ROFL
isyavai 1 year ago
reminds me of 9.11
they sure look a lot alike
bluetedddy 1 year ago
@bluetedddy yeah exept that the WTC didn't have bright flashes and loud booms and explosions at the base right before collapse.
RBAWilcox 1 year ago 11
@RBAWilcox Nope it had everything...check ur facts
CASTRER 11 months ago
@CASTRER The WTC had been evacuated and gone under demolition construction like getting rid of pipes, and eletrical stuff. Then demolition workers went in and took about a year and a half to properly rig 3 towers with explosives. Then on the explosion a sequence of loud explosions were heard in the seconds before collapse along with bright flashes. Then The building collapsed while many explosions were being heard and seen.
No I don't think the WTC had these characteristics.
RBAWilcox 11 months ago 23
@RBAWilcox we are in youtube...u will find ur answer easily!
CASTRER 11 months ago
@RBAWilcox read some of John McMurtry's work and watch loose change or engineers for 911 truth. ps I would like to know what qualifications you have that would validate your opinion ? it sounds like you think what major media outlets told you to think;
kingofkensington7110 11 months ago
@kingofkensington7110 why would i believe the guys from loose change. none of them have college educations and all they do is take quotes out of context to support their claim. in fact the guy narrating loose change started out just writing a little story about 9/11 being a conspiracy, but along the way he decided to call it a true story for some reason. and the researcher believes every conspiracy in the book. how about you tell me why u think its a conspiracy
RBAWilcox 11 months ago
@RBAWilcox numerous eye-witness accounts and video evidence support claims of seeing such explosions before the controlled demolition of the WTC occurred. Only an idiot would think an airplane hitting one of these buildings could have brought it down...a clearly ignorant idiot. The only thing even more preposterous is the idea that a plane hit the pentagon during this clearly self-inflicted wound to justify a still illegal war in Iraq. Seriously think for yourself on this one...its right there
rmwill08 10 months ago
@rmwill08 explosions are common in fires, pressurized containers, electrical transformers,pipes bursting. CDs have a quick sequence of explosions in the seconds before the collapse of the structure, they don't have random explosions here and there. Explosions were heard even after And It wasn't soley the plane that brought it down, your making straw man arguments. It was a combination of the way the building was constructed, the plane impact, and the ensuing fires that brought down the towers.
RBAWilcox 10 months ago
@RBAWilcox ...there are previous cases of planes hitting weaker buildings without any collapse such as we witnessed at WTC. The building would not have fallen like that from the causes you describe. It was clearly the result of a CD, the way the building fell is evidence of that. The plane and the fuel it was carrying would not have caused that type of collapse. Perhaps someone with no understanding of how these buildings were built could be duped as you so obviously are..not me though.
rmwill08 10 months ago
@rmwill08 No, you obviously don't know how those towers were built, your comparing it with planes hitting other buildings without realizing the fact that the towers were uniquely built. The towers were built with a tube and tube system, there was no concrete encasing the core or trusses. Meaning the fires could easily weaken the steel. And the way the tower fell proves there was no demolition actually. It would be impossible to plant explosives. the falling top section proves it
RBAWilcox 10 months ago
@RBAWilcox The buildings were built to withstand several planes hitting it. There was plenty of time in the months leading up to this for explosives to have been planted...This was planned, poorly, but good enough to convince the ignorant masses. Every "attack" that day was fabricated. The stories don't add up, what about the explosions AT THE BASE of the towers? I am not trying to just introduce new info to muddy the waters. Explain why Bldg 7 collapsed without any plane crashing into it.
rmwill08 10 months ago
@rmwill08 You have no source to prove that the WTC could withstand several plane impacts, and there you go again, I never said the plane alone brought down the towers. And you mean to tell me that The government managed to plant enough explosives into 3 different buildings which could still work perfectly after plane impact without being seen by the thousands who worked in those towers or by the additional thousands of people who walked through the lobby each day
RBAWilcox 10 months ago
@rmwill08 Your argument is invalid, to cause damaged to the base of the towers would make no sense as the tower started collapsing from the top, not the base, and Your comparison with the empire state building is also invalid as the ESB was hit by significantly smaller and slower plane than the 767s that hit the WTC. also the ESB was constructed differently with concrete encased interior columns, something the WTC did not have. and WTC 7 was heavily damaged by debris and left to burn for 7 hours
RBAWilcox 10 months ago
@RBAWilcox it wasn't heavily damaged. Just a few minor scratches. No more than some of the other buildings in the area.
xcited4vids 10 months ago
@xcited4vids just a few minor scratches eh? According to the firefighters the building had 1/4th of its base scooped out, and a large vertical gash on the center bottom going up 10 floors, and then it burned for 7 hours. So....I guess that would be a very big scratch...No I think thats major damage.....And what about the deutsche bank building...not really a few scratches there either. The only reason that didn't collapse was because it didn't catch on fire. Your argument is invalid
RBAWilcox 10 months ago
@RBAWilcox buildings have burned for more than 24 hours and still not collapse. And the way that building7 went down shows that it was brought down by explosives. Inside job, period!!
mammaknullaren88 7 months ago
@mammaknullaren88 actually the way the building went down actually proves there was no demolition, There was no ejection of debris or a sequence of explosions heard before collapse. Also Building 7 was heavily damaged by debris from the collapse of the North tower. The building only had a 2 hour fire proofing and had a unique structural design in which every floor above floor 7 was supported by 3 main trusses. Then failure of those trusses lead to the collapse of the building.
RBAWilcox 7 months ago
@RBAWilcox come on, you believe that small fires and some broken windows brought this building down? this building fell inwards in its own footprint.
mammaknullaren88 7 months ago
@mammaknullaren88 if you believe that the fires in WTC7 were small based on early pictures of the north side then you are purely mistaken. The firefighters on the scene reported that Building 7 was on fire from the bottom floor to the top floor. The entire building was on fire, all 47 stories were in flames based on accounts by every firefighter on the scene. conspiracy theorists like to show pictures from the north side early in the day when the fires were significantly smaller.
RBAWilcox 7 months ago
@rmwill08 In 1945 a B-25 bomber crashed into the Empire State building on the 78th floor....no collapse of the structure...The WTC buildings were of a class designed to withstand the impact of several planes. The buildings had no gas lines in them...Of course, none of these arguments even need to made after the obvious lie the government put out about The Pentagon being hit by a plane...This is not a straw man argument, it illustrates the inconsistency of the government as a information source.
rmwill08 10 months ago
@RBAWilcox obviously, the people who wanted the twin towers taken down knew that they had to make the demolition believable. So it was a top down demolition, to give the appearance that the airplanes were the cause of the collapse. Google Barry Jennings.
xcited4vids 10 months ago
@RBAWilcox it sure did have one characteristic of falling at nearly free fall speed. wierd...
mammaknullaren88 8 months ago
@mammaknullaren88 in every photo and video of the collapse the debris are falling faster than the ash cloud, which was also falling faster than the building, this proves the buildings were falling well below free fall speed.
RBAWilcox 8 months ago
@mammaknullaren88 actually it fell at about twice free fall speed...
usindependent50 7 months ago
@RBAWilcox
What?! I thought the only bomb in the world was black, round and had a fuse that you light with a match.. is that not so?
I had no idea there where DIFFERENT kinds of explosives.. and that TECHNOLOGY improves over time..
But i know that the general public get knowledge about, and access to all new weapons, explosives and other technology that is invented straight away.. so nothing i have not heard about can be used in any way, ever..
I do not know how i can be so smart...
KmanMonkeyPig 7 months ago
@RBAWilcox god i have gone through like 15 videos and you are the first person with common sense
trainfreak7745 6 months ago
@RBAWilcox actually it did have the bright flashes and loud booms go right up the building
TheMangese 11 months ago
@TheMangese Actually no it didn't what are you blind?
RBAWilcox 11 months ago
@RBAWilcox ..the same question I would ask you...A blind person does not see what is not there, but rather does not see what is there. Since the flashes WERE there and YOU didn't see them; YOU are the blind person. When somebody (in this case most of the media and some of the government) lies to you, everything they say from that point on is suspect. Everything the media/government puts out must be thoroughly examined as so many lies have been pushed on us in the past.
rmwill08 10 months ago
@RBAWilcox You respect you firefighters right?
////////////Many of them said they heard booms and the bright flashes are cautch on video.
One more thing, and this makes me feel a bit... how should i say... Deff?///////////////////
Tell me what do you think about what happened in the pentagon.
////////////////Wathing you answer
Spelfr 8 months ago
@Spelfr explosions are not rare in fires, in fact they should be expected. pressurized containers, electrical transformers explode, pipes burst, elevators fall, windows are broken, rounds are setoff. demolitions admit a sequence of booms in the seconds before collapse. not random explosions.
and the ''flashes'' only appear as waves of dust and don't start until after the collapse has started, but this is a result of compressed air.
and for the pentagon, well that was hit by flight 77
RBAWilcox 8 months ago
@RBAWilcox There was some boom before the collapse. Sound travels relatively slowly but if you watch some videos which are filmed from the street below, it looks like the sounds comes first and then the tower collapses, but maybe it was just that some metal cracked, made really big sound and it took about second or two when gravity started to pull the tower down, and maybe wtc tower could stand up for a second after the towers core breaks down if some small pillars can support it
isokessu 8 months ago
Comment removed
RBAWilcox 8 months ago
@isokessu your previous statement """""""""it looks like the sound comes first and then the tower collapses."""""""" is completely wrong. First of all you can't see sound waves, so by saying it looks like sound comes first is completely wrong. And in none of the videos are explosions seen or heard in the collapse. In demolition videos like these explosions are heard miles away, and in none of the videos of the WTC collapse are explosions heard.
RBAWilcox 8 months ago
@RBAWilcox see the sound waves? I never said that the sound came from some giant explosion what could made visible sound wave. There was some sound just before collapse and it came from the tower what collapsed, but of course the biggest sound came from the collapse itself when everybody started cracking in tiny pieces and of course all that was heard outside New York and I didn't say word "explosion" earlier. Btw I've seen windows shaking from fireworks which were shot 10 miles away.
isokessu 8 months ago
@isokessu There is no such thing as a visible sound wave, humans can't see sound, not even in an explosion. What your talking about is a condensation ring that is created after a the sound barrier is broken in a sonic boom, anything that goes faster than this is faster than sound. The Towers did not fall fast enough to break the sound barrier and therefor couldn't have created a condensation ring. Not even a controlled demolition can do that. Therefor you are lying about seeing sound waves.
RBAWilcox 8 months ago
@RBAWilcox. Sorry but I think you understood wrong my comment and I understood your comment wrong. I didn't mean that somebody could actually "see" sound and my first language is not English but at least in Finnish even blind guy can say that something "looks" like something, even though he can't see it. I meant that you can h e a r the sound first before s e e i n g the collapse in some video, I can't find that video right now to show it but I'm sure it's somewhere on YouTube and other sites.
isokessu 8 months ago
@isokessu what are you talking about in every single video the sound starts after the collapse and the delay depends on the distance from the towers. In no video is sound heard before collapse, also you are only talking about youtube videos, which could easily be an audio screw up. Unlike you I was actually in New york on 9/11. Believe everyone in New york when they say sound came after the towers started collapsing
RBAWilcox 8 months ago
@RBAWilcox sound of explosion did accure on 9/11. there is one video of it.
mammaknullaren88 7 months ago
Comment removed
RBAWilcox 7 months ago
@RBAWilcox
Hmm, i´m reading out of context here, but WTC didnt collapse this way, it collapsed from top to bottom, explaining why nothing was heard at the base. Sorry if i´m out of talking out of context :)
Euugor 8 months ago
@RBAWilcox Yes, there are. Many people being interviewed explained this in good detail...
revilor234 8 months ago
@RBAWilcox - well, we really don't know that now, since all the television footage was altered. Some of it was pre-fab CGI animation, stuck into the data stream to simulate "real time" coverage. There were MASSIVE craters in the plaza and the streets before the collapses began. There have been hidden by the media until now.
YouTube user CNN911Fakes - you will be blown away (pardon the pun)
nameofthepen 7 months ago
@RBAWilcox you can see some explosions, but not that obvious (because they didnt want it to be THAT obvious, duh). and there WERE many people commenting they heard BOOMS. you can see in videos about it.
AgathaBeso123 6 months ago
@AgathaBeso123 explosions are extremely common in fires, electrical transformers explode copy machines and pressurized containers explode, pipes bursts, vehicles explode after paper set them ablaze, Floors partially collapse, even the sounds of bodies sounded like explosions. As loud as the collapse was, it sounded nothing like an actual controlled demolition. but you'd rather believe that all accounts of explosions meant the use of bombs, even when explosions were heard long after the collapse
RBAWilcox 6 months ago
@RBAWilcox Yes WTC7 has the bright flashes
bwoods00 6 months ago
@bwoods00 no it does not, those bright flashes would have needed to be accompanied by loud explosions before the collapse. The flashes scene during collapse were most likely reflections of broken glass and failing electrical appliances within the building. Because there is no sequence of explosions in the seconds before collapse the world trade center complex was not brought down by controlled demolition, but by the combination of impact and fires which caused the columns to bow inward.
RBAWilcox 6 months ago
@RBAWilcox watch the new add that the families have released in new york. best quality video i have seen yet or wtc7's collapse. you can see many flashes similar to this one. just my opinion though.
bwoods00 6 months ago 2
@bwoods00 did you not read my full comment. Those flashes were most likely electrical appliances failing or less likely reflections of broken glass. In a demolition bright flashes would have been accompanied by loud explosions in the seconds before the collapse. A demolition also causes a near free fall speed. however World trade center 7 collapsed in 20 seconds starting with the collapse of the east penthouse when free speed would be 6 seconds
RBAWilcox 6 months ago
@RBAWilcox i did read your full comment and i respect you opinion that they were "most likely" reflections of broken glass but like all other "truthers" i don't agree with your take. people can argue about the collapse of this building and will for years to come, but at the end of the day the most damming pieces of evidence was that it was left out of the 911 commission report. that's pretty ridiculous. wouldn't you agree with that? i think that it speaks volumes.
bwoods00 6 months ago
@bwoods00 I said reflections were less likely, rather the flashes were electrical appliances failing.
World trade center 7 is left out of the 9/11 commission because it's not an engineering report. The 9/11 commission was to investigate why the attacks occurred and to provide ideas to prevent future attacks. Building 7 wasn't the target of terrorism, rather it was destroyed from falling debris and fire. Several other buildings were also destroyed and the commission doesn't mention them either.
RBAWilcox 6 months ago
@RBAWilcox was big explosionos at the base :-( they say gas containers in the basement make them.
vxAREKxv 6 months ago 2
@bluetedddy Yea, except they don't.
WispierTetrahedrons 1 year ago
9/11 wasn't a controlled demolition. This building collapsed into its footprint, while the wtc had debris flying all over the place. It also collapsed slightly slower than this.
bluedodo296 1 year ago
Looks exactly like the planned demolition sometime between september 10th and 12th roughly in the area between Massachusetts and New Jersey
FFFFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKK 1 year ago
Did he died?
Dragonich777 1 year ago
Chuck Norris was taking a crap on the top floor...
lukedood321 1 year ago 3
This is the perfect imposion :D
iToasterman 1 year ago
awesome! just like the twin towers but without the notable explosions.............
free533 1 year ago
@free533 not cool man, not cool...
iToasterman 1 year ago
@free533 so... you think The Twin Towers Collapsing was awesome?
BigAirChicago22 1 year ago
@BigAirChicago22 no, i never said it was awesome. I meant that they fell just like this building
free533 1 year ago
haha it reminds of Rampage
traviskoetz 1 year ago
that's cool and the weird dust that came from the bottom was awesome
17cchambers1 1 year ago
How much Asbestos are you breathing? Fast money, no health concerns.
VMATT500C 1 year ago
@VMATT500C believe they remove as much as they can before doing it
nasalstyle 1 year ago
@VMATT500C you obviously have no clue how strict the government regulations are regarding asbestos removal...
ortzinator 1 year ago
@ortzinator Really, being an ex iron Worker, I bow to your superior knowledge about buildings and Gov. Regs.
VMATT500C 1 year ago
23 people watched this video from inside the building.
amiyaiitkgp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 inside job
wild0hawk 1 year ago
i wish i could watch an implosion from a helicopter
BonJoviFan96 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This was a terrorist attack by goatherders who hate our freedom. You can clearly see the commercial airliner hit the building. It was the fuel that weakened the steel. They also found a boxcutter in the debris and a picture of Muhammad Ali in the street below. Clear proof that it was goatherders who are fanatic boxing fans. We need a security organization to protect our, lets call it mortgageland, from these evil doers. Lets hire some Israeli zionists to run it. How about Steven Spielberg? GOY!
angstotheclown 1 year ago 4
@angstotheclown wtf am i reading?
littlebritan 1 year ago
@angstotheclown fuck u and fuck israel
hishyhafez 10 months ago
@hishyhafez Indeed, they are everything you never were and never will be. Israel has a history and culture thousands of years old, they have a functioning, developing society.The more they succeed and progress, the more your hatred intensifies. While we are evolving and advancing in all areas,you are consumed and busy with hatred and terrorism. Who's the one thats fucked ? Wake up !
marceluswallace514 10 months ago 5
@angstotheclown uummm you realize you see secondaryt explosins going up through the building which means it was done by a construction crew you are cleary a fucking dumbass
zToNeZx 10 months ago
@1jeppe123 Yes, but true...
TRUTHERGENERATION 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
just like 911
HerroHerrar 1 year ago
It was Al - CIAida for sure... Do you see the Plane??? *Joke*
TRUTHERGENERATION 1 year ago
LOOKS AND SOUNDS LIKE 911..remember the Firemen using the payphone...Those were explosion cracks, just like a whip... 911 STILL AND INSIDE Job and Cheney, bush, rumsfeld and the other pentagon warmongers are to blame.
UTubeFreeMind 1 year ago
oh look, a building was demolished. that must mean 9/11 was an inside job! hurrrr durrrr
HelmutVillam 1 year ago 3
@HelmutVillam because it was the same team...maybe
conrebbi 1 year ago
Lol the cameraman jumped.
spikehosinski 1 year ago
9/11 reloaded .....
Soulstorm77 1 year ago
Where have I seen this before?
KJamesMellick 1 year ago 2
@undergirl0714 "if you look good enough you can see flashes" lol did you actually see this video? its almost impossible to miss those flashes... you can be miles away and you could see them. and for a big tower like the WTC you HAD too see tons of them!! but we didnt
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@undergirl0714 lol "and if you look good enough you can see flashes" i think that flashes are easy to see even if i am far away and a controlled demolition can be heard like km away.... you just fail at this dude
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
ASOMEEE
lovebunna 1 year ago
Just like 9/11...So that's how it was done..
joshkund 1 year ago
Thast was a perfect implosion. Wait a minute, it looks just like the WTC?
baconosten 1 year ago
You mean a hobo's nightmare.
Aerba54 1 year ago
is that dust or smoke
sardorn 1 year ago
a window cleaners dream.
Nahkranoth8 1 year ago 2
@Nahkranoth8 a very wet dream
resto4life 1 year ago
The difference from this and 9/11 are huge.
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
@MJ4ever911 not really.
joshkund 1 year ago
@joshkund um just to know, where do you see al those flash and explosions in 9/11? to take two huge towers you need tons and tons of tnt or whatever its use...
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
I wonder if modern buildings are actually designed with safe demolition in mind and have instructions with the plans where to place the explosives, if not might be a good idea.
857frank 1 year ago
a lot like the twin towers. a professional job
gtarbmx 1 year ago
@gtarbmx yep
jeremyelliott1 1 year ago
They had extra dynamite and no one had seen a building collapse in a while so-
this happened.
dratoxify 1 year ago
9/11 part two
OswaldoBonfa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OswaldoBonfa A little sick dont you think?
1810Lee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
looks like terrorists in a plane to me
scottscott23 1 year ago
@scottscott23 I know right
joshkund 1 year ago
looks like terrorists in a plane to me
scottscott23 1 year ago
@scottscott23 @scottscott23 Very grown up. Would you like to say that to 3000+ families?
No....I did not think so.
Did you think the same when Pan Am Flight 10