BBC reports WTC 7 fell 23 minutes too soon

[snakeskin2u2]

That the story was scripted by Rothschilds" Reuters and passed to the BBC one hour too soon is documented in the offficial response by the BBC -which is also available on youtube.

There was no incorrect or misinformed statement. The news story was the identical one passed by Reuters to all media, - except in this instance one hour too soon.

[snakeskin2u2]

The script being read by the newsreader has been put to paper long before 9/11, as it details the full (official) reasons for "collapses" of all buildings on 9/11 by broadcasting "breaking news" (one hour too soon) about an "unexpected" event that not only is a physical impossibility (WTC7 vertical collapse from "dust") but has never happened before in the history of the planet.

Rothschilds press released too early and blew the gaff.

[snakeskin2u2]

This video is irrefutable evidence that the whole of the 9/11 scenario was faked with controlled demolitions and media. It also shows that the event was planned long before 9/11 - before British summertime at the latest (March 2001), possibly much earlier by a few years.

The only thing that ever "collapsed" on 9/11 was the conspiracy theory about hijacked planes, suicidal arab terrorists, and primitive cave dwellers controlling US airspace.

The live transmission of this lie cannot be denied.

[snakeskin2u2]

The BBC received payment of 1billion euros for the year 2011 as a "loan" for services rendered. They have been paid annually through the EU by Beatrix/ Bilderberg group since the first payment in 2001. It is not coincidence that 9/11 was perpetrated in that same year.

There are no proper accounting records of those payments, as there have never been any repayments or interest transferred since 2001.

The BBC are merely one of many such propaganda machines operated by the banksters.

[PoetryHound]

@snakeskin2u2 With regard to the BBC, I see you're having a hard time with my question. It's a simple question. You claim there was a script. Of course, there's no evidence of any script. But more importantly, and now I'm asking for a third time, why would the BBC reporter have needed to a script telling her to say something that she would have said anyway?

[PoetryHound]

Why would the inside job plotters need to issue a press release to tell the reporter to say what she would have said anyway?

Truthers are paranoid retards.

[snakeskin2u2]

@PoetryHound

If all you have to offer is verbal abuse and ridicule, I would remind you that those who seek to perpetuate the myth about 9/11 shall soon look forward to short, sharp and swift retribution for their misleading efforts.

If you have nothing to say, then say nothing !

[PoetryHound]

@snakeskin2u2 Yeah, sure, I'll face retribution. Yep. Because you say so. Got anything better than that?

Wait! You don't have to answer that. Try to answer this instead: Why would the inside jobby jobbers need to issue a press release to tell the reporter to say what she would have said anyway?

[snakeskin2u2]

@PoetryHound

If you seek answers to your questions in seeking to support those who perpetuate the myth about 9/11, then you admit that you know less about 9/11 than others who have commented.

That the media is srtictly controlled throughouit is well known, except in your circles, obviously.

If you seek to enlighten others, then do not come to them with questions.

YOU too have to live in this world - (at least until you are brought to book).

I would suggest you find another job.

[PoetryHound]

@snakeskin2u2 Unfortunately for the remaining 9/11 truther true believers like you, the "inside job" theories haven't moved beyond highly biased and misinformed web sites and YouTube videos which have no credibilty and accountability. They're run by some Joe Blow guy who can make up whatever claims he wants and people like you swallow it without questioning it. There are indeed problems with the media, but to claim all media in the world is controlled is silly.

[snakeskin2u2]

The press release was timed for CET, not GMT for London.

= pre-scripted = controlled = fake "news".

[GandhiJefferson]

this connection error is so fake and stupid and cheesy...

[snakeskin2u2]

Rothschilds press released through Reuters and BBC London studio (+ live camera in Manhattan) one hour too soon. They forgot to allow for daylight savings (BST) at London studio.

London was 6 hours ahead of Manhattan that day, not 5 hours. British SummerTime did not end (revert to 5 hours) until October.

Press release (scenario + reasons for "collapses") was therefore pre-scripted prior to BST ( March 2001 at latest).

All available evidence confirms these facts given by live camera.

[snakeskin2u2]

9/11 was pre-scripted = controlled.

[Viideoloover]

Yes I'm possibly just a johnny come lately due to events in my life at the time taking my attention away from 9/11, but ironically were directly effected by the ramifications of these events and wanting to get the people to see what has been done to us.

Now a big realization to what has actually occurred from these events is truly clear to me.

George Bush did all of the things he did intentionally to the financial system of our nation and was groomed by empire to commit these crimes as well

[Viideoloover]

THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN

IF THIS REPORTER IS REPORTING LIVE ANDTHE BUILDING 7 HAS NOT FALLEN YET THEN THE INFORMATION BEING GIVEN TO THEM WAS OF AN EVENT ALREADY KNOWN. AND IF IT WAS KNOWN THE OTHER TWO WERE KNOWN AS WELL. IT JUST DIDNT GO DOWN WHEN IT WAS SUPPOSE TO DURING THE DEBRI CLOUD FROM THE OTHER TWO BUILDINGS

AND AT THE END THEY LOSE THE LIVE FEED OF HER TOO.

THAT'S EXACTLY LIKE THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO SCREW UP AN OPERATION LIKE THIS TOO

[snakeskin2u2]

@Viideoloover

Yes - she is reporting live, and yes, the building has not yet fallen.

That is all confirmed many years ago.

[Viideoloover]

THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN

IF THIS REPORTER IS REPORTING LIVE ANDTHE BUILDING 7 HAS NOT FALLEN YET THEN THE INFORMATION BEING GIVEN TO THEM WAS OF AN EVENT ALREADY KNOWN. AND IF IT WAS KNOWN THE OTHER TWO WERE KNOWN AS WELL. IT JUST DIDNT GO DOWN WHEN IT WAS SUPPOSE TO DURING THE DEBRI CLOUD

THAT'S EXACTLY LIKE THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO SCREW UP AN OPERATION LIKE THIS TOO

[snakeskin2u2]

The live transmission clearly shows that a "surprise disaster" was merely a pre-scripted timed demolition.

[snakeskin2u2]

They press released at London time = Manhattan +5 hrs. when ir should have been Manhattan +5+1(daylight savings time).

The commentary was therefore pre-scripted prior to the day for that error to occur.

That the pre-scripted reasons for "colapse" (which had not yet occurred) cited intricate causes of the collapse for the (official) causes for the "collapse" of the twin towers shows that the whole 9/11 saga was pre-scripted = controlled.

Simple deductions from a seemingly unimportant news flash.

[snakeskin2u2]

Since the full reasons given for the "collapse" of WTC7 rely on the "collapses" of both twin towers (which also just happen to be the official reasons for those collapses) have been pre-scripted, then it also follows that all three "collapses" were pre-scripted prior to the day.

It therefore follows that all 3 buildings were subjected to controlled demolitions.

Those are the facts as deduced from this live camera/script, and those facts cannot be denied or disproven in any form.

[MitchofSmeg]

@snakeskin2u2

"live camera", not likely, most likely a green screen which wasnt updating properly and they were trying to unfuck.

As for it being "prescripted" and not having them clued in, how on earth does that happen in the way you suggest? It cant, its idiotic to believe so...

As for it being a controlled demolition, no, it was not, theres plenty of proof out there on this subject and i cba finding it for you as it is seriously not that hard to find and if i did you would not listen.

[snakeskin2u2]

@MitchofSmeg

Not at all - it's a live recording.

This video is in it's own right evidence that 9/11 was pre-scripted = controlled demolitions in all three so-called "collapses". That cannot be argued with. it's fact, not theory.

A surprise attack cannot be pre-scripted. This proves it was, therefore it is a timed event =controlled.

[snakeskin2u2]

@MitchofSmeg

That is not true.

There is no evidence whatsoever that these demolitions were anything other than controlled.

All evidence from all fields of research and expertise indicate that..

There is, however, no necessity to refer to other arguments from any fields.

It is only necessary to deduct facts from this video alone to arrive at the truth -

And that truth is confirmation by live camera and script that the whole of the 9/11 scenario was a scam.

[snakeskin2u2]

The live camera clearly shows that the newsreader is reading from a pre-prepared script written prior to the day, causing time error Manhattan/London discrepancy )London was GMT +1 hour that day).

It is not possible to pre-script an event which takes you by surprise.

Therefore, the collapse of WTC7 was pre-timed, pre-scripted, and pre-planned.

It therefore follows that the "collapse" of WTC7 was in fact controlled demolition.

[MitchofSmeg]

"the following aired at 4:57"

"show started at 5:00"

Wat?

"we'll leave it there at the moment" left from what?

Also, wheres the clock? The BBC generally has a clock and has done so since before 911 happened, just wondering (i used it to know when to leave for school)

No offence, but i highly doubt the BBC would be "clued in" on the building being blrought down, i highly doubt it, anyone worth their salt would not tell a media centre "we are bringing down the building" beforehand.

[snakeskin2u2]

@MitchofSmeg

Nobody said the the BBC were "clued in " as you put it.

The span of the time error is of no importance.

What IS of importance is that the demolition was timed and pre-scripted prior to the day.

That is all in evidence from this recording alone.

[Seigu007]

just goes to show you how DUMB americans are. They wouldnt know truth if it stared them in the face. Losers.

[saxfreak01]

"IT'S BEHIND YOU!" as they say in all good pantomimes

[joeneylonable]

right ok, look up this news show, it aired at 6pm not 5pm as the uploader is saying therefore the buliding collapsed 37 minutes before the show started also, as the guy below suggested, it is highly likely that the field reporter is standing in front of a blue screen, shell be stood doing her report in a studio somewhere in new york, ignor any images you see in this video

[square1mediavideo]

I wonder if she is standing on front of a blue screen and is not there at all. The BBC would never admit to that.

[neiluk2006]

I guess the US government is planning to pull off a new 'WTC 7' style job this weekend

[nwallis89]

Listen up retards: WTC collapsed at 5:21:10 pm EDT not EST. Read that ok? 5:21:10 pm EDT is 21:21:10 GMT. This reporting happened at 21:54 therefore that is 33 minutes AFTER WTC 7 collapsed. Anyone not understanding this?

[snakeskin2u2]

@nwallis89

The live transmission was broadcast 23 minutes prior to the 'collapse", which the hewsreader says happened " some short time ago".

-Approximately 1 hour too soon.

This is confirmed not only by the live shot (WTC7 still standing) and from all sources). The press release was transmitted one hour too soon - at CET, not GMT or London studio. It was therefore in error and ignorant of BST (British summertime).

That it was clearly timed without BST indicates script was from pre-March 2001.

[satchfan2010]

BBC= British Brainwashing Corporation. 9/11 was an inside job and that's the truth.

[The911watch]

INSIDE JOB!

[reubz1]

rememberbuilding7 (dot) org/video-gallery/

get involved. collective consciousness will prevail.

[KittyKittySunshine]

this is a joke, the whole world is a joke

[adamskiADD]

@KittyKittySunshine

All the world's a stage.

[JohnEmeryMusic]

@adamskiADD Excellent quote. I was wondering if that quote from Shakespeare made anyone else weary...side note: "the solomon brothers building"...the rabbit hole is deep.

[watts4563]

Very odd I must say, you would think IF there was some kind of cover up, they would do a good job at it, but this is a rather large mistake by the BBC, maybe the BBC had heard it as a rumour and broadcasted it, because they thought they needed to get the news out? Just my opinion anyway.

[Horse237]

@watts4563 The BBC heard it from Reuters which is owned by the Rothschilds. They also bought AP so you get all your news from the Rothschilds and other Jewish owned or controlled mainstream media outlets.

[gggfausto]

Go to buildingwhat (dot) org and send a letter to NYC Council Speaker Christine Quinn to investigate building 7. Thank you!

[infoseeker264]

It's obvious they read the cover story too soon.

If you think it was an honest mistake, how did 2 different broadcasting companies make the SAME MISTAKE at the SAME TIME on the SAME DAY about the SAME THING?.

CNN reported the same thing.

[RonaldWieck]

Pixarian: you post complete idiocy and you announce to your intellectual and moral superiors that the game is over??? Yes, dunce, the game IS over. It has been for a long time. You ignorant liars have been exposed.

[RonaldWieck]

Pixarian: Yes, keep laughing, dunce. You know nothing and are incapable of learning.

Real firefighters, engineers, and fire safety experts EXPECTED WTC 7 to collapse. Your falsehood about no high rise structures ever collapsing has been debunked.

No, Rupert Murdoch and the BBC have nothing in common. There is no cabal of super-villains controlling all the news outlets in the world. Your agenda-driven nonsense is laughable. Conspiracy liars are the most gullible morons alive.

[RonaldWieck]

No, nobody who knows anything thinks that the 2.25 seconds of free fall of the facade "proves" anything. The total absence of AUDITORY EVIDENCE of a series of simultaneous blasts PROVES that the collapse of WTC 7 was NOT a controlled demolition.

Ever wonder why there isn't a single demolition expert in your evil cult?

[graysight]

@RonaldWieck the fuel from the planes spread to the wtc 7 and caused structural failuere there too, or somethink favoulous like that, or maybe there was no recorder to record the explotion noise so i never happened, or maybe no one believed the witnesses because that never could have happened ... or something like that ?¿¿?¿??

[RonaldWieck]

Conspiracy liars still try to pretend that their imaginary super-villains selected the network most hostile to George Bush and handed it a smoking gun. If the building was going to collapse anyway, WHY THE SCRIPT? Duh!

News outlets frequently jump the gun on breaking stories: the Pope was declared dead three times before he actually expired; the death of Jim Brady, Reagan's press secretary, was announced, although he didn't die.

The liars can't fit the far-left BBC into their fantasies.

[pixarian72]

@RonaldWieck Hahaha what?! The building was not expected to collapse as the fires were sporadic and average, and no high rise has ever fully collapsed from fire despite being fully engulfed, it wasn't hit by a plane.

Only a moron doesn't realise that the BBC and every other news network are owned by the same international cabal of bankers that own the US Government. Only the truly gullible and moronic still believe the left/right dog and pony show. Oh dear the BBC fits eh boy?

[waterkant666]

countdown to controlled demolition

[haritsanwar]

and people still believe that 'terrorist' did this? come on...

[774stefan]

controlled demolition

[sec0ndevolution]

You'll only believe this if you're LOOKING for a conspiracy. Why would the conspirators slip this information to the media? They'd destroy the building and let them report it as and when it happens.

Firefighters relayed info to reporters at the time that the tower would collapse. The BBC obviously got their wires crossed and jumped the gun, reporting that it had already collapsed. It wouldn't be the first time this kind of mistake has been made.

[circa1970]

just correlate the time from ny to where ever bbc shoots. Minus the time zones and then find out when the building actually fell. Therefore you will have no discrepency

[omarramzan1]

it says clearley that the building on the right just next to the reporters head is still there. wich u claim as the world trade centre,, but the world trade center is the biggest building in the world. so if the building on the right just next to the reporters head 2:21 . then y is the building on the left bigger then the building on the right 4. it clearley shows that the building on the right is not the wtc...

[xXtractHD]

To be fair the footage behind her may have been pre-recorded and screened. That's actually my guess because I find it very hard to believe anyone would be giving BBC prior knowledge when they could just see it happen themselves from the thousand cameras at the site. It wouldn't do them any good.

[tommy19470rocks]

10 out 0 that terroist suck i give it a 1,000000000,000000,00000,00000­0

[Karmathejedi1701]

temporal glitch in the matrix

[anne48503]

Denierbud11 there is a video by bbc above that says that the building was only hit by debris of the other building falling. There were many buildings that were hit by that same debris but they didn't collapse. I think YOU need to listen closer to what is saying and then do some research and see how many other building had a demolition style collapse caused by FIRE! Then get back to us here.

You will only find 1 and that is wtc7. Then do research on building structure of wtc 1 and 2

[HighTyro05]

Why was the camera fixed on WTC 7, like everyone knew it was going to collapse. When is the last time you watched a Nascar race where all the crahses were perfectly in frame.

[johnzy69]

this made me think about what David Icke said about "repeaters" journalists. they really say anything even the building has fallen even all you can see is turn you ass back and see it standing. FFS!

[dreadnaught589]

INSIDE JOB

[Startwister]

It´s interresting,how people denie the truth.

The more proof there is, the more people denie.

Is America really free? or do they just THINK they are free. Snakeman415 thinks so, but ask him, and all the others: Does the patriot act and homeland security bring you freedom? Is it freedom, when your telephone calls are intercepted by the cia, ist it freedom, when your goverment knows, where you are on the internet, wich sites you have visited, and what you are writing in some video comment?

[vengencefrom1979]

a cold hard slap in the face.

911 - inside job.

[wmarae]

its there

[OmegaVP]

Even if the building in the BBC video is not WTC7, It is the TIMING of the announcement that is of interest...How could they get it RIGHT, 20 MINUTES PRIOR TO the ACTUAL collapse? The BBC opened their talking points envelope too soon. conspiracies don't require a large number of people "in the know". A small group, in key positions, are necessary. Read: WEBSTER TARPLEY: 9/11 SYNTHETIC TERROR to understand FALSE FLAG TERRORIST OPERATIONS.

[Denierbud11]

"could they get it RIGHT, 20 MINUTES PRIOR TO the ACTUAL collapse? "

The NYFD had evacuated the site hours before an anounced the collapse was immenent.

No conspiracy.

[nela04]

wtc7 was not even hit, it only had fires on 5 floors, and what i recall a fire have never destroyed a building completely

[Denierbud11]

WTC 7 was struck and severaly damaged from the collapse of the North Tower - it was hit and hit hard.

Therer were fires on many floors- you do not recall correctly.

Next time research something before showing the world you are an ass

[snakeman415]

This video is bullshit/fake and you know it. Your website is a joke by the way and I hope someday you have to live in a country that isn't free like America. Then maybe you'll appreciate our country/government a little more you selfish asshole

[Karimpulsive]

U r a fake! Slave of the hewish People and the Bilderberger! in 10 Year you won´t say the same shit like now.

[Alamo25]

Thats a fake.

look at the point of the video where she raises her hand,.... THERE IS NO DEPTH !! Bluescreen i say.

Secondly the environment is completly static.

And the resolution of here together with her assymetric moving reminds me of the good old Interactive movies back in the 90's.....

Try harder next time folks.... was a good fake though ;)

[wmarae]

go look it up on bbc news website

[MrDicusBigus]

The combined weight of the towers was more than 1.5 million tons. 1Each tower was built to safely sway about three feet during strong wind stormsand -this is on wikipedia by the way ..and now you "SUPPOSE" that they were not to come down by 23 min ...Right...

[BadCase]

this video is about WTC 7 not the towers it is a another building that fell on 9/11.

WTC 7 fell at 5:23 pm but BBC reported that it fell at 5:00, did you even watch the video?

wikipedia.....roflmao

[daivdmorre]

wikipedia is usually wrong its not validated...anyone can add a page so it could be false

[morpheus341]

Inside Job

[retardothemonkey]

no no no. one of the WTC towers did collapse but you see the other WTC tower was still there dont get confused and the picture on this vid is so good so dont say this building is gone and that ones still there unless its stands out alot which (besides the one WTC tower) none of those buildings stood out that much and you dont knwo the pint of veiw so you might be looksing at something different

[BadCase]

what?

[pixarian72]

@BadCase Hahaha what you said! This guy is the worst disinfo agent I've ever seen. His last comment is comedy gold.

[superlyrical1987]

@BadCase don't worry four years later and his comment still makes absolutely no sense at all...lol

[GeneralKuno]

@retardothemonkey WTF man, learn some "grammer." Sabagay, your username says that you're retarded. Haha

[fred10538]

This is an actual recording from the BBC that day. The so-called "Salaman brother's building is actually behind correspondant Jane Stanley's head, and when she turns to point to the WTC smoke, she is actually looking directly at the building that they just reported has collapsed" What this means is, that the person who provided the script for them to read, either got his wires crossed, or had foreknowledge that the building was going to collapse!

[4bd13l]

this video proofs what i did not understand nothing about it I say its fake

[friendlyal32]

k so this proves what......?

[sebcartwright]

(cont'd) Also, the BBC does not keep a copy of every second of footage off of every camera "in a vault." Tons of footage is either destroyed, recorded over, or never taped to begin with. Chances are, they were not even recording this footage on the camera because it wasn't a news report, it was a live interview. The only copy the BBC has of this, if they have any, would be the exact same thing we have here, the programme out.

So...... yeah. That's pretty much your entire argument there.

[BadCase]

you know nothing about BBC World News' policy about retaining footage because you haven't asked them yourself, I have they have a triple redundancy storage system for all of their footage.

[sebcartwright]

It's irrelevant if they have a triple redundancy storage policy because if it's a live interview it was probably never recorded in the first place other than the programme out. They most definitely do not keep every second of footage in a vault and if they do have three copies, it will be three copies of the programme out, which doesn't do much good since it will be identical to the footage you have here.

Crazy conspiracy theorists.

[BadCase]

Dude you are what Carlos Mencia would call a DEE,DEE,DEE

if you could take your head out of your ass and google "BBC part_of_the_conspiracy" you would see that they admit to everything I have said the only theorist here is you since you have no facts and only theory and I have only verified facts, keep opening your mouth your IQ becomes more and more apparent each time you do.

[sebcartwright]

My IQ is "approaching genius" as a matter of fact... 155... or is that irrelevant?

[BadCase]

Thats nice mine falls in the genius category, have you found your way to the bbc site to read what they have to say yet

[sebcartwright]

(cont'd) Also, how do I know this is the 5 PM Bulletin? It could be the 6 PM Bulletin. Additionally, during breaking news, they have breaking news bulletins every 30 minutes. So, this bulletin could have been from the 5:30 bulletin.

[BadCase]

oh if you still dont think its WTC7 ask cortmeister262 we had a good discussion about it

[sebcartwright]

Also, unless there's another brown building just behind her, it is without a doubt the wrong shape. I have tons of photos of the building in books and it doesn't look like the brown building over her shoulder. And I still don't know that this is the 5 PM bulletin.

Just pause the footage at 2:45. There's a brown building that's definitely not 7 WTC. There's a glass building... which isn't brown.

[BadCase]

the brown building is directly in front of WTC 7, WTC 7 is visible above and to the right of the brown building. Look at my most recent video to see a video response to corts claim that it was not WTC7 in the video he has since conceded that it is WTC 7.

[sebcartwright]

The brown building at 2:41 happens to be the wrong shape for 7 WTC. In fact, other than both buildings being brown, it shares little resemblance at all to 7 WTC. There's another building that would be about the right shape... but that building is blue.

[BadCase]

OMG how dumb can people be the BBC has admitted everything I have said in the video google "BBC part_of_the_conspiracy" its the 4th link down they did record it and did save it and then they all turned up missing

[topformfitness]

My question to you is this, then: when asked to provide tapes of this footage to review the BBC claimed that is was "missing"... even though they ALWAYS keep at least 3 copies of news footage (one in a vault). Look it up.

[saiello2061]

In my previous post I identified the 'brown' building as the ACE Hardware based on Google Earth info which I think is wrong. All the rest I stand by. Using Google Earth and Microsoft 'Live Search' and with a lot of building identifying and some triangulation I think I've pinned the reporters location to one building, but I'll be damned if I can't find the name of it! It's on the corner where Thomspon St and Watts Street intersect...

[saiello2061]

(cont).. That's the problem with conpiracy theorists, always needing to look for a more complicated answer than is necessary in order to fit their world view...

[saiello2061]

(cont)... So there is no doubt that we are looking in the right direction and that WTC 7 is still standing at this point. It's the chinese whispers effect. Someone reports that WTC 7 is ABOUT to collapse, as it passes down the line this gets mistranslated to WTC 7 HAS collapsed. Reporter on the scene has no time to check facts and the BBC World news needs a story....

[saiello2061]

Listen up people, any thought of conspiracy is wacko territory. What's the simplest explanation that could be had? I'll tell you, it's the fact that the BBC got it wrong. Simple as. Stop the video at 02:41. The building you maintain is WTC 7 is in fact WTC 7. The brown building in front is the ACE Hardware building. The two tall buildings to the left of the picture, the ones with large and small 'spikes' are the Woolworth and the Transportation buildings respectively... (cont)

[kvaks3000]

Two possible explanations:

1. People knew building 7 was going to collapse (remember, they gave up on it), and BBC somehow got this confused and thought it already had collapsed.

2. This footage is really from after the collapse, and the building seen is another building.

Both are more likely than the conspirators being stupid enough to inform the BBC of their deed beforehand.

[mattymaxinc]

He does say "reports are coming in". Talk about choosing quotes...

"Details are very sketchy"

"The area is closed off"

Clearly it was a very big mistake to say anything other than "it is reported that the WT7 building has collapsed" but really, conspiracy?!

[judehannah]

I don't get it.. Forgive me if I'm missing the point, but even if 9/11 WAS an inside job, how would the UK/US know that the building was gonna collapse? Either I'm being a twat or this is the thinnest conspiracy theory of all time...

[BadCase]

If the collapse was pre-scripted and carried out with prepositioned explosives, it would be most effective to have everyone keep to the same story so the theory is that they were reading from a script of sorts only things were running behind in New York and they hadnt blown the building up yet,and the fact that he gives the reason for the collapse before the building ever collapsed and defiantly before an investigation and yet still had essentially the same explanation as the 9/11 Commission

[BadCase]

Some low quality copies of the original video are back up on archive(dot)org

archive(dot)org/details/bbc200­109111654-1736

[PewterPlunder]

lenny is trying to meet his quota for today, he's not posting quick enough, i hope they get someone better to post

[BadCase]

As do I, although I have to admit I gives me great joy when the only argument they can come up with is trying to say a camera change is a video edit even though it obviously isnt.

[BadCase]

wow i find i hard to believe that a video that had over 2500 views just during last night while I was sleeping only had 100 views in the last hour amazingly the same amount my other version of this got

[damonsecloro]

youtube and google were going apeshit trying to censor the original video, but tough shit for them because the internet is still FREE!!! the BBC has no excuse other than they are psychic a steel building will collapse from fire.

[RAMMSTEINfanatiker]

the us government really sucks!!! they dont tell you anything true about such things -.- !! ufo,wtc...

[BadCase]

google "Fast-thinking pilot foiled hijack"

to read the store that youtube apparently doesnt want you to see

[BadCase]

omg youtube will not post my message in defense of muslims

[madanus]

finally the sheep will wake up.. but probably not....

it's about time all the debunkers apologise to those they have slandered over 'conspiracy theories'.. I have been getting ridiculed for years. These freedom fighters everywhere are doing it all FOR YOU... TAKE STOCK AND DO YOUR BIT.

[goldcub]

are you guys retarded?? Yesterday CNN reported that 18 kids were killed by a suicide bomber on a soccer field? Did that happen? Um, no, there were bombs set off nearby and some kids got hurt. The point is when the media hears things they run with it, even if its hearsay. So the point is, the muslims are terrorists, period.

[BadCase]

Well were the 18 people she was reporting had died running around alive in the background of the video?

didnt think so

[JESUSISLORDAMEN]

bush and blair are the biggest terrorists, why do you think they is so much hate?

[mateostein]

yo, if you give up rescuing a burning building, guess what happens? Officials could have just announced that it was going to collapse and reporters took that as it fell.

You realize that the leaps of logic are just absurd in the conspiracy theory., right? Occam's razor, guys.

[bertel1987]

well, the news reporter could've had a "inspiration", too. however...the poor excuses of the us administration start to vanish.

[BadCase]

yo if you do your research before posting comments that are not based in fact you save me 5 minutes of my life by not having to shoot down your week debunking.

The fact is that there are only 3 steel framed buildings that have fallen from fire in the history of the world.

[lennysquiggy]

hey genius, it's spelled WEAK, not WEEK. but yeah, you're a genius so i guess you knew that.

[BadCase]

ROFLMAO omg you just jumped the shark with the spelling argument the true last stand of a loser when they have no way to refute your facts they go after the spelling, oh and by the way you want to compare brain pans try 141 on size for a IQ and im not talking some internet IQ BS im talking administered by a professional in a educational institute.

[BadCase]

OMG OMG OMG I missed the word "for" between "on" and "size"

that must mean everything I say has no merit.... um or it could mean i dont check before i post

[KokSquad]

Well planes hit the building so Its more like PLane Crash Explosion then fire and there have been buildings that have collapsed due to fires im not debunking or anything im just sayign it has happened b4

[BadCase]

Mo this is WTC Building #7 not the twin towers no plane hit it. And the only steel framed high rise buildings to ever collapse from fires are the WTC buildings.

[BadCase]

heheh I said Mo should be No :P

[BadCase]

In 2005 in madrid spain the windsor building burned for 24 hours they even decided to pull out and "let" it fall which it never did.

So if you let a steel framed skyscraper burn what happens, it burns and burns but it doesnt fall at least not in 24 hours time so surely not in 8 hours time.

[PewterPlunder]

shit is so blatant... you could sell a ketchup popsicle to a woman in white gloves with this video.. 9/11 = INISIDE JOB

[myn00]

Amazing ! At first i didn't belive this conspiracy nuts but now.... People watch this and see the truth!