Oh Lawd! Everybody has the right to express their feelings. FEELINGS aren't good or bad, but you CANNOT act out on the negative feelings in a crazy way. For you will suffer the consequences!
@purebrownsugar77 Thank you for watching my video. Unfortunately, with the advent of Cultural Marxism, Politically Correct Speech and Hate Speech Laws we no longer have the legal right to express our thoughts. As long as one can interpret, one will declare it to be negative or not. Therefore these consequences become compounded, outside of our private interactions, and become matters under the consideration of judicial prudence, corporate / political elitist individuals and movements.
@DamienNeverwinter Leave it to you to bring me something that I will have to make a video response about to address properly. However, I will say this individual is exercising his "freedom of speech"! I disagree with most of what he has stated. However, I support him fully in making his voice heard. I do not personally invest into the ideal of Hate Speech. If it could firmly corroborated that hate was his key motivator it is still acceptable to give his opinion. Under the
@EuphoricImpact (cont for DamienNeverwinter) current law (which I disagree with wholeheartedly) this would not qualify as hate speech. I am sure this video has a good chance of being flagged and mislabeled. I am downloading it. Even if it meant me taking a hit I would mirror it, if asked. Not because it expresses my sentiments but due to the values I hold dear.
The content of his video is manipulative in my opinion, largely misleading, and full of disinformation. It is an
@EuphoricImpact (cont for DamienNeverwinter) unbalanced presentation. Now I have noticed several claims he has made as having validity due to my anecdotal evidence. But I have not reached a definitive standing on these questions. I will have to research and review the evidence. For example, I have read little (I plan to read more, in the very near future) about Margaret Sanger.
Down the road, I think I will make a video response to this. If you have any specific questions
@EuphoricImpact (cont for DamienNeverwinter) about his video. PM me and I will be happy to continue the dialogue. As I want to keep this area. open more for the contents of my video.
ive been saying for a couple yrs now that phelps is a shill who is helping the gov. beta test anti-speech and anti-demonstration laws.
what better way to get a legal basis for handling non-conformist activities and speech than to have already done so in a controlled environment?
good vid. it doesnt matter if people agree or disagree. whats important is that we all have the opportunity to argue our views, and support that right for everyone else...if we cant ALL agree on that, we're damned.
@knowthingman Thank you for watching and contributing....Yes I am in complete agreement with you. It would appear that those that have manufactured the ideal of "hate speech" are using this platform to demolish speech.
Phelps I am certain has multiple functions, and is not singularly what he appears to be.
Yes one of the key points I was hoping to stress is the importance, of all people, to have the ability to disagree publicly without negative consequences.
Oh Lawd! Everybody has the right to express their feelings. FEELINGS aren't good or bad, but you CANNOT act out on the negative feelings in a crazy way. For you will suffer the consequences!
purebrownsugar77 1 year ago
@purebrownsugar77 Thank you for watching my video. Unfortunately, with the advent of Cultural Marxism, Politically Correct Speech and Hate Speech Laws we no longer have the legal right to express our thoughts. As long as one can interpret, one will declare it to be negative or not. Therefore these consequences become compounded, outside of our private interactions, and become matters under the consideration of judicial prudence, corporate / political elitist individuals and movements.
EuphoricImpact 1 year ago
Oh Lawd!
purebrownsugar77 1 year ago
Great commentary...viewed & shared, Peace & RespectU
angelsnupnup7Warrior 1 year ago
@angelsnupnup7Warrior Thank you for watching.
EuphoricImpact 1 year ago
A penny for your thoughts on the below EuphoricImpact
DamienNeverwinter 1 year ago
@DamienNeverwinter Leave it to you to bring me something that I will have to make a video response about to address properly. However, I will say this individual is exercising his "freedom of speech"! I disagree with most of what he has stated. However, I support him fully in making his voice heard. I do not personally invest into the ideal of Hate Speech. If it could firmly corroborated that hate was his key motivator it is still acceptable to give his opinion. Under the
EuphoricImpact 1 year ago
@EuphoricImpact (cont for DamienNeverwinter) current law (which I disagree with wholeheartedly) this would not qualify as hate speech. I am sure this video has a good chance of being flagged and mislabeled. I am downloading it. Even if it meant me taking a hit I would mirror it, if asked. Not because it expresses my sentiments but due to the values I hold dear.
The content of his video is manipulative in my opinion, largely misleading, and full of disinformation. It is an
EuphoricImpact 1 year ago
@EuphoricImpact (cont for DamienNeverwinter) unbalanced presentation. Now I have noticed several claims he has made as having validity due to my anecdotal evidence. But I have not reached a definitive standing on these questions. I will have to research and review the evidence. For example, I have read little (I plan to read more, in the very near future) about Margaret Sanger.
Down the road, I think I will make a video response to this. If you have any specific questions
EuphoricImpact 1 year ago
@EuphoricImpact (cont for DamienNeverwinter) about his video. PM me and I will be happy to continue the dialogue. As I want to keep this area. open more for the contents of my video.
Thank you for watching.
EuphoricImpact 1 year ago
/watch?v=JzNBmzKV_kQ&feature=feedbul A perfect example of Freedom of Expression being labelled Hate Speech
DamienNeverwinter 1 year ago
ive been saying for a couple yrs now that phelps is a shill who is helping the gov. beta test anti-speech and anti-demonstration laws.
what better way to get a legal basis for handling non-conformist activities and speech than to have already done so in a controlled environment?
good vid. it doesnt matter if people agree or disagree. whats important is that we all have the opportunity to argue our views, and support that right for everyone else...if we cant ALL agree on that, we're damned.
knowthingman 1 year ago
the concept of "hate speech" is aptly and honestly named - which is unusual in our times.
those that support "hate speech" laws, do, in fact, "hate speech".
knowthingman 1 year ago
@knowthingman Thank you for watching and contributing....Yes I am in complete agreement with you. It would appear that those that have manufactured the ideal of "hate speech" are using this platform to demolish speech.
Phelps I am certain has multiple functions, and is not singularly what he appears to be.
Yes one of the key points I was hoping to stress is the importance, of all people, to have the ability to disagree publicly without negative consequences.
EuphoricImpact 1 year ago