Added: 2 years ago
From: homerFCB1992
Views: 120,080
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (186)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Russians don't screw around!  They know how to build solid military machines. Problem is they don't care too much for safety regulations. Chernobyl, The widowmaker and the Kursk all could have been prevented.

  • was the kursk one of these?

  • @smilo996 no it was Oscar class submarine

  • @fleeex Wasn't it an Oscar II class or is there no difference?

  • @DrHooty911 Yes my bad, Kursk was an Oscar ll class and its about 10 meters longer than the Oscar l class.

  • If i remember it correctly sharks aka AKYLA have nuclear power to blow up half of the entire world, and russian has them 4 at all- 2 always patrolling. America would not dare to attack russia, while this monsters are patrolling the seas .

    Could be mistaking, did a research a very long time ago, i mean very.

  • @MrGodItself Um, not sure. It's only got 20 RSM-52 SLBMs

  • Its not submarime, its sunken apartement

  • Its a big sub, but size isn't always a sign of strength. Besides, you want to hope that the strength lies in the men running these types of ssbn, on both sides of the pond. With great strength comes great responsability, I hope these ships never get the chance/need to be used for there designed purpose. This means usa/russian or any nation regardless of political ideas.

  • so this sub can be the end of a little country....

  • This is one submarine i feared most, apocalyptic firepower.

  • That's a big fucking submarine.

  • The whole world into dust !

  • Nice video, shame about the stupid comments written by people who in all likely hood have never served in a navy for any country. i did (The Royal Na,t give a monkeys if it was bigger or smaller than anything else. A nuclear sub is a nuclear sub and its a simple case of who ever hits the fire button first wins as 99% of the time nobody has the first clue where these subs are hidding accurately enough to do anything about them

  • 1) Ohio Class

    2) Typhoon Class

    3) Delta IV

    4) OSCAR II

    5) LA Class

    My top 5 fav subs; personal opinion.

  • @XBLChubbySkunk

    Then you obviously haven't heart about the swedish gotland class or the german type 212A.

    those subs are today's most advanced subs by far. a german officer was able to sneak into an us aircraft carrier group and emerge just 200m away from the carrier. the us admiral was raging since aircraft carriers are protected by a few subs and destroyers which all didn't notice the the german sub thanks to the hydrogen fuel cell.

  • @natsplit

    that's because they are diesel electric. If the US wanted to be super stealthy, then they would swap out the Nuclear Reactor and replace it with a diesel electric....

  • @XBLChubbySkunk

    It's more then just diesel electric. The swedes use a stirling generator, germany a hydrogen fuel cell. The electronics, the sonar, the propeller, the surface coating is also more advanced. Also germany employs supercavitation torpedoes which are 250mp/h fast and can not be jammed.

    Both countries could also build nuclear subs. But they don't, because they are outdated and hybrid diesel-electric are currently the most advanced hunter subs.

  • @natsplit Well I know, in that list of mine, was just my favorite subs. the top 4 are SSBM capable subs. I just find them awesome. The German and Swedish subs are amazing when you look into them further. The only draw back is that they have far more limited range than a Project 941 Akula or Ohio Class.

  • @natsplit supercavitation torpedoes were invented by the Soviets shkval torpedoes

  • @YUSKHAN

    so what?

  • @natsplit

    its been around for year rumours shkval can hit Mach + speeds under water and their building sub also with it's technology so the future submarine travel will be in the Mach speeds

  • @YUSKHAN

    I know. But why are you telling me this?

  • @YUSKHAN Submarines will never travel at the speed of sound underwater. Please don't be so crazy.

  • amazing

  • A K U L A Class ...named typhoon by nato crap

  • @mauricioalfredo83

    actually it's called Project 941.

  • @XBLChubbySkunk

    yeah Project 941 Akula. I just call it the Typhoon for short, when I say Akula, people think of the Akula Russian Attack sub.

  • Very Red Octoberish.

  • I attacked that sub in MW3 LOLOLOL

  • @ArmyRanger871 thats an Oscar 2

  • geesh. youtube should just ban commenting. This is getting ridiculous.

  • 5 people are American

  • Actually There are 3 Typhoon subs atm and they will be pieces of metal by 2014.The new class of RPKSN (or SSBN) submarines called Borei is the Typhoon's successor and there are already few of them .

  • @Miloshmkd The reason for decommission of the world's largest submarines are restrictions imposed on Russia by Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty

  • I dont believe in the comfort part

  • @deadpeng russians never invest in look or comfort lol

  • @catalinux007leiro actually there is a sports hall, sauna, swimming pool, separate cabins for all members of crew in the Akula, Russian "Акула" ("Shark") class submarine (NATO reporting name: Typhoon) :)

  • In Soviet Russia Submarine submerges water!

  • berga es un mostruo

    

  • @Moisescurra jajaja si lo es... es el mas grande de la historia humana en cuanto a subs... el mas peligroso y el mas callado su propulsion funciona como un calamar... no ruido..

  • @Ben998x coño hermano agregame a tu correo este es el mio moisescurra@hotmail.com y asui hablamos q de seguro tu sabes cosas q yo no se y yo a lo mejor sabre cosas q tu no sabes si quieres agregame

  • There are only two Typhoon submarines. Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the ass full

  • it sucks that all of them have been decommissioned

  • @jessica5000000 true... had to bedecommissioned cos of restrictions imposed on Russia by Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty

    Their 2 × OK-650 pressurized-water nuclear reactors, 190 MW can light up a whole city!!!

  • @Ifrazcanada i dont buy that. the arms reduction treaty doesnt affect number of reactors. But the missiles they hold could had been a problem but I think they were just too expensive for the russian navy to maintain. Or maybe too outdated which is why they made a new class. Its probably time for america to make a new modern class of ssbns now. IM sure our ohio are getting very dated too. They were designed in the late 70s

  • Dude this is inhumane. You are hurting Americans who have grown up with dreams that they have world's leading military technology. Please delete your videos.

  • @ViperCanel Nice one my friend,I laughed allot after reading your comment LOL :D:D In fact the americans really grow with that in mind!

  • Hast du des auch auf deutsch?

  • @Ludix147 inwiefern meinst du das? Die Texte, die da beim Video stehen?

  • can someone tell me the name of the song

  • what do you know about submarines anyways? are you even in the Navy?

  • @xXsouthernXrebelXx go granai class ohio shit to trash

  • If you were in the ASW community these subs scared a lot of people. First they were titanium hulls, covered with rubber. They had the ability to run on batteries and shut the reactors down, reactor pumps make noise, Electric motors don't. Then they had the ability to stay at sea a lot longer and have more loiter time on station. Ever wonder how the Russians got so advanced in submarine design? John Walker gave them our ASW doctrine, they read it and found the ways that we were able

  • @jesterd14 We used to own the Russian Navy, but then they found what they were doing wrong and learned our tactics. He also told them that we literally had a phone tap at their sub base via an underwater cable that we spliced into. All of a sudden the Russians come out with a submarine that is almost non magnetic and can dive deeper and run quieter.  Just one of these Typhoons could have taken out the entire east coast of the US by launching just offshore, Reaction time, less than a minute.

  • News said Chinese are building one 11,000 ton nuke sub

  • I find it hilarious, the main reason Russia built this is to beet us Americans in submarine size - which they win by 3 feet.

  • @ItsP3anutButt3r stop posting comments, please. You are writing bullshit!

  • @homerFCB1992 stop replying, your just helping the bullshit...

  • @ItsP3anutButt3r Then tell me which submarine is just 3 feet smaller then the Typhoon? There is no such submarine. The Typhoon has a Width of 23.3 m, while for example the Ohio-class has a width of 12.5m... 10m are not the same as 3 feet, idiot!!! Also you know a shit about the reasons for building this submarine.

  • @homerFCB1992 oh really? Cause last time I checked Ohio was a hell of alot bigger than 12.5m dumbass!

    Googled: Typhoon, 172 meters = 564.30 ft USS Ohio, 560 ft

    Now smart ass who is closes to the fucking jackpot now?

  • @ItsP3anutButt3r Oh, and if your talking about width - your off the topic, Im in length.

  • @ItsP3anutButt3r No no no, dumbass, you said Typhoon is SMALLER not shorter. However typhoon-class is twice as big as the Ohio-class. When you want to tell how big something is you have to have to count LxWxH. So go to school and learn some Math stupid Idiot!

  • @ItsP3anutButt3r Im sure you close the Jackpot in stupidity...

  • @homerFCB1992 No, not me. I do the facts, of course would I not be stupid. I proved you wrong, which concludes you as the stupid one.

  • @ItsP3anutButt3r you fucking stupid Idiot!!!! YOU NEVER TALKED ABOUT LENGTH!!! Ypu said that some othe sub is just one feed smaller!!!!!!!!!! I don't know which sub you mean, but typhoon is bigger then anything else, so shut up and stop speaking shit or you will be blocked, I have no time for such damn stupid dumbasses like you, who are writing false things under my video!!!

  • @homerFCB1992 trololol

  • @ItsP3anutButt3r try to answer in human language please

  • @homerFCB1992 let me ask you something, what do you know about submarines anyways? Are you even in the Navy?

  • @homerFCB1992 Wasn't it made to be able to shoot it's missiles then hide under the ice?

  • @ItsP3anutButt3r what a nonsense. of course typhoon was not built to have just the longest - it is much more massive than all others... it was not created after the US-Subs - it was even before - and what you are discussing is not the newest generation of submarines. newest type is Russian Borei-class - and this are actually worldwide the most modern submarines - same size than the US

  • like I400

  • Russia the best.

  • @TheByblikbyblik However to my other submarine video somone wrote something else....

  • may not be the quiets subs around but the US and Nato were afraid of them

  • Describe bad Aim ? USA Nuke missle hits in range off 100 meters, Russian in 150 m or 200m? I dont see a point of good Aim since its gona destroy every thing in Miles.

  • Maybe they are sad becouse Typhoon looks beter then any thing ever created in USA even in the Sci-Fi Movies :D

  • Typhoon was soo big becouse Russains had extra metal left from German Tanks after WWII :D

  • I know why there are more Ohio Subs then Typhoons. Becouse americans are pussies and scared even from their own shadows :D

  • to bad that only one remains in service, for me they are even better then new ugly borei class subs,

  • Almost bigger then my penis

  • Oh, and that German planes in known as the Horten Ho IX or Gotha Go 229 (Ho 229).

  • @weaponexpert1

    The US did copy the Nazis, if you heard of a Nazi plane called the Gotha, why is their a US plane called the B2 Spirit Bomber. Both planes' design are similar (wing shape).

  • they copied it by the german nazis

  • @weaponexpert1 you about american space program? ;)

  • @aleks070777 you were copied by the german nazis, too! USA didn't copy anything from the german nazis!!!

  • @weaponexpert1Werner von Braun Sikorsky, Einstein americans? They don't born in america and don't educated them. America bought their brains.

    If it were not european scientist Einstein Fermi, and many other, America would not be a leader of using atomic Energy

    If were not Nazi Brown, America never would have landed on the moon

    If were not Russian engineers Sikorsky America never heave helicopters.

    America country of traders, not scientists, you are buying and do not create ;)

  • @aleks070777 ok you MUST be an uber nazi

  • @weaponexpert1 lol eat dicks

  • @NosferatuAaacaado you were officially identified as a german nazi. thank you mr. hitler#7896

  • @weaponexpert1 I told you to eat dicks. Use your mouth by it's application.

  • @NosferatuAaacaado hello mr. skinhead

  • Yes, but will it blend?

  • *shudders* imagine if the German U-Boats got that Big...

  • It is still a cool video, even if it is a bit biased and based totally on opinion. If the Ohio class sub is so bad, then why does it carry HALF of the US nuclear arsenal? There are 18 Ohio or Trident Subs but only 6 typhoons (ever built). Were the Soviets just trying to show the US that they were willing to destroy the world? I understand that is very important for your enemy to think that you will kill the world before you will lose a war. Cool stuff!! A bit too scary though. God help us all!!

  • @MPetrozzaIsGod ' Were the Soviets just trying to show the US that they were willing to destroy the world?'

    wat

    It's US who's started the arms race. Not us. You americans are the pioneers of ass-backwards logic.

  • @NosferatuAaacaado Are you a soviet? The US took some scientists and combined them with German scientists to start the arms race then the USSR spent the rest of its history chasing the US. The typhoon was only so big because the Soviets weren't advanced enough to build a smaller weapon system. So they built this mammoth sub and 5 others to combat the much better Ohio class subs. My question was pointed toward the fact that the Soviets NEVER could have won a war of that kind, why build the sub?

  • @NosferatuAaacaado ...and besides...Where is the Soviet Union now? Or are you just a Russian that wants the cold war back? The cold war is gone as well as the USSR. Nice waste of time... the Soviets had to prove that they could starve their citizens while thinking that their way of life was worth fighting for. What country came up with the SALT treaties? If they were smart, it would have been the Soviets.

  • @MPetrozzaIsGod bitch, please.

    Soviet? I'm just a Russian-German studying communications in London who happens to have a question as to why the fuck you are still such asshats.

    Now who's living off the cold war propaganda? And whose government is constantly trying to find themselves an enemy across the ocean so that they can constantly justify their humongous military budgets?

  • @NosferatuAaacaado If you had read my comments from over a month ago, you would have seen that I am just interested in the subject of wars and weapons. I asked if the Soviets were trying to prove that they could destroy the world by making this submarine. I asked a number of other questions also. This submarine carried weapons that did not have to be on a submarine. The missiles could have been fired from land. So i asked a bunch of questions hoping that I would get legit answers....

  • If you are just trying to 'hurt my feelings' with 'hurr durr, USSR is no more' - don't be an idiot and stop wasting your time. I'm not going to cry over what happened 20 years ago - neither I will be crying about what your western-backed 'democratic' collaborators did to my country in the 90s.

    Better watch out so that USA doesn't suddenly become DSA. Just saying.

  • @NosferatuAaacaado Instead I get you talking crap about what nation did this and that. You came here to start a fight and got one...what did you expect? I don't care where you are or where you came from. I asked questions a month ago and instead of getting answers, I got some idiot calling me names. WHO IS WASTING WHOSE TIME HERE? Obviously YOU are wasting my time...thanks for starting a fight and answering zero of my questions, dickhead!

  • @MPetrozzaIsGod pfft. If you want to get some answers, first learn some tact and how to ask those question without offending people on the other end. You totally have to layout your assertions and assumptions in a provocative manner... 'are you just a Soviet who want cold war'... excuse me, what the fuck? What do you expect to hear in response?

    And yes, they are false and have nothing to do with real state of affairs in USSR.

  • @MPetrozzaIsGod It would take hours to name all the factors and people responsible for the collapse.

    As for the sub - it was made to provide a final strike capability from beneath the ice - yes, it's only a deterrent in the end - but arms race is known for both sides (USSR in particular since it took a primarily defensive position) trying to outsmart the blunt mace which was rocket nukes with innovations and bright ideas - nuke trains and TOPOL mobile launchers is the same play.

  • Thank you guys for your facts...if you know facts. It just seems to me that you would make your sub, then make the missile system to complement the sub. It is silly to me to make a missile system, then make the largest sub of all time for it, if the missiles have the range to be fired from land. I understand the time issue ( the sub launched missile will hit faster), but if it is strong enough to wipe out your enemy, your enemy will immediately launch against you killing all. No one wins!

  • Anyway, what I said earlier...am I correct? The typhoon was so big because the soviets did not have missiles small enough to scale down their subs. I also heard that these were the quietest soviet subs ever made, but Soviet subs were known for being loud. Is that correct? The sub is quiet compared to other Soviet subs, but really are not quiet at all? I also heard that these subs could almost destroy the US while still in port. If that is the case, why even make the sub?

  • You are all a bunch of nuclear war junkies!!! If anyone has the answers...I'd like to know facts, not opinions. Is it true that the Soviets built their missiles and then designed their subs afterwards? I heard that the soviets were not able to match the sizing capabilities of the Americans. Ohio class subs have smaller but still capable missiles. Since the Soviets were not able to make smaller missiles, they had to build typhoons huge, in order to carry their missiles that were too big.

  • The americans may be able to defend themselves better but the Typhoon could sit just off the shore with its 20 nukes and america would never know it

  • ATTENTION!!!! ATTENTION!!!! homerfcb1992 is a german nazi!!!!

  • THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER!

  • Yet the Soviets couldn't build a car lol.

  • "big SOB" like admiral Greer said in red october movie

  • Одна из них в строю , еще две модернизируються под булаву, так что их пока никто не утилизировал.

  • IT´S TO FUCKING BIG!

  • Sell just one to Amidinijhad in Iran target>> Isreal and NYC Wall street and Los Angeles Holleywood you will exterminate 3/4 of the problems(JEWS) on this Earth right now.

  • This is the answer to all America's troubles just re-target the Bastards and allot of BIG POLICE FUNERALS with Tacticals...oh and all the BIG PRISONS too...get rid of both Problems all at once....IF you get the NWO or Bilderburg group HOT DAMN will party for weeks hurray!

  • Too bad Russia's ICBMs have pretty bad aiming, and rely on lolhueg warheads to actually affect their targets.

    Oh, and this is NOT better than the Ohio Class. I don't get how you can say which is fucking better, when their job is TO FUCKING LAUNCH SUBMARINE LAUNCHED BALLISTIC MISSILES. If you are going to judge the submarine based on how well they can do that, British and American ballistic missile submarines outclass Russian and Chinese subs.

  • @535party ohio class is old go pay off your debt

  • @HongKongKanto umad bro

    that is why they are replacing it

    herp a derp

    the ohio class can still do its job, which is to deliver ICBMs from off of an enemy coast without them knowing it. I don't get how people can judge which is the best BM Sub, but if we are going down that road, fine. The US can defend its coast much better than Russia can, so the Ohio could without a doubt infiltrate the Russian maritime borders much easier than anything they have. Herp a derp.

  • @535party u are mad just look how you get offended by all this, this video doesnt say anything about ohio jet americans always need to response their propaganda bias, they need to since they know we are better than them.

  • @HongKongKanto chinese are genetically, physically, physiologically, and mentally inferior to americans

    chinese are vermin that should be destroyed

    loljk

    but umad

  • @535party americans are genetically, physically, physiologically, and mentally inferior to a larger half of the world. And it's all your fault. A country consisting of descendants of mercantilists, jews, thieves and criminals that were told to GTFO out of europe cannot do good by definition.

    lol j/k but not really

  • @535party 'Too bad Russia's ICBMs have pretty bad aiming, and rely on lolhueg warheads to actually affect their targets.'

    any factual proof of that, lolcow? Beyond wikipaedos and jane's?

  • Пожалуйста, любви, чтобы увидеть эти хит все сволочи в США особенно Нью-Йорка Уолл-стрит и мошенники, которые управляют НЕФТЬ Co.s

  • this was a great sub....20 years ago. The ohio class oud did this....and the virginia class just flat out blows the typhoon away....

    glad we're kinda allies now......now you dont have to worry about the evil americans anymore.....fail

  • thay got a pool no fair we need a bigger sub and add one but it has to be still fast

  • Noisy as hell, big fat fucking target. Nice and heavy, sinks to the ocean floor nice and fast!

  • @szore just as your ohio. Go pay some bills

  • @NosferatuAaacaado LOL WHAT? The Ohio is quieter than the surrounding water MORON. If we didn't have to DEFEND and SUPPORT the entire world, Including mother Russia (wheat), we wouldn't be having problems. And yet, where is the ENTIRE WORLD putting their money right now? Where is the 'safe haven'? The rupple, (joke) the yuan? joke, no, FOOL. U.S. TREASURIES! So get your head outta your ass.

  • 'LOL WHAT? The Ohio is quieter than the surrounding water MORON'

    Nobody fucking cares. Akula isn't an attack sub. It's made for striking from the cold waters ( so it needs to provide crew comfort), something that Ohio don't like to and don't really have to do.

    'If we didn't have to DEFEND and SUPPORT the entire world, Including mother Russia (wheat)'

    Mmmhmmm, more sucking our oil dry in the 90s. Funny, you're dumber than I thought.

  • @NosferatuAaacaado Weak. Very, very weak, Rusky.  Who is talking about Akula? (Noisy as hell). What oil are you talking about in the 90's? Seriously, I'm not trying to be funny, what are you talking about? ...90's, isn't that when that Joke of a system, what was it called again,,, I forget, it's so irrelevant now...OH! The Soviet Union, right, Isn't that when the Soviet Union collapsed because Reagan bankrupted them trying to keep up with our military? LOL LOL WHAT A JOKE!

  • And uh-oh, no. You are the ones to get your heads out of your asses. Also, does the FRS belong to US? No.

    Tell me why you were scared so shitless when U.S. lost it's AAA status? Why did Obama had to go 'fuck you I'm a dragon'? Is there something to hide?

    Oh, and why 3 did countries started buying obligations in rubles? That was a year ago. And that's not the end.

    Your info is obsolete. Keep raising the debt ceiling. Don't ask questions, just do it, kids. We won't interfere.

  • Theres no soviet navy

  • "Если эту лодку выставить в Москве где-нибудь рядом с Царь-Пушкой, то, смотря на неё, человечество осознанно и добровольно навсегда откажется вести какие-либо войны." (Начальник оперативного Управления Северного флота В. Лебедько, 1982 год).

  • LoL, the sub is so fucking big it has 2 reactors powering it!

  • @TheAdolfHparodies A friend of mine designed a submarine that was larger than this, it wasn't IRL (derp), but it was for an RP site. It carries twice as many missiles as the Ohio, and is twice as big too.

  • Comment removed

  • @TheByblikbyblik Because it is out of order, as it maybe is too epxepensive for Russia to keep it in order

  • @TheByblikbyblik потому что это чертовски кучу металлолома!

  • @weaponexpert1 Ты молод и глуп.

  • @TheByblikbyblik бориска за бутылку продал

  • @Sys13 Бьюсь об заклад, Иран хотел бы купить одну из этих ха?

  • @TheByblikbyblik ix ne vsex utilizirovali ostalas odna akula dlia ispytanii raket tipa bulava.

  • @htpm100 Три осталось.

  • @TheByblikbyblik da izvini ty prav.

  • impressive in size but its not the quietest sub around,heck,all russian subs av shit quieting systems,u.s n u.k naval personnel sometimes joke around saying you can track a russian sub leaving a russian port from the middle of the atlantic ocean,LOL,typhoon maybe 50% bigger than u.s ohio class subs,but ohio carry more nuclear missiles than typhoon,ohio class subs av 24 vertical nuclear missile launch tubes while typhoon only av 16,ohio class subs also more advance n more quieter.

  • @fmoa You are right, that the ohio class can carry more missiles then the typhoon, but the typhon can carry 20 missiles and not 16(look at 1:52 )and the missiles of the rsm-52 missiles are more powerfull, so that they are bigger.

  • @homerFCB1992 and the fact that the typhoon, especially akula II class, carry 4x533mm torpedo tubes like the ohio + 6 more external 553mm tubes and 4x650mm torpedo tubes, and that is ALOT of torpedo.

  • @homerFCB1992 but the ohio is much quieter. the typhoon can be tracked and destroyed much easier.

  • @homerFCB1992

    indeed, ntm they are faster, have better depth and are actually on par with both us and british navy submarines when it comes to underwater quietness

  • @fmoa The missle warhead payload of the gian Typhoon is almost 35% more powerful than our little Ohio submarines, sorry.

  • @fmoa actually you're wrong. Despite their size, typhoon-class subs was (they're not in service anymore) the quiest submarine ever constructed. Furthermore ,Ohio-class subs have a different mission than the Typhoon. You can not compare an Ohio-class with a Typhoon-class submarine as you can not compare a destroyer with a carrier.

  • @loukosnio This man speaks wisdom. Don't compare two vessels that carry out different tasks.

    (Yes, Russian people reading this, that means you can't accurately compare the Tico and the Kirov).

  • @fmoa This submarine can be really quiet, but it's power is in being able to get under polar ice and remain there for days without having to move or make any noise. Then it can go up, crush the ice layer meters thick and fire SLBMs, or just fire them from under water (for latest generation of bulava missiles based on topolM).

    Also, Ohio's rate of fire is limited due to absence of launching platform for each missile, while typhoon is not. Anyway typhoons are to be replaced with 4G Borei soon :/

  • @fmoa This submarine can be really quiet, but it's power is in being able to get under polar ice and remain there for days without having to move or make any noise. Then it can go up, crush the ice layer meters thick and fire SLBMs, or just fire them from under water (for latest generation of bulava missiles based on topolM).

    Also, Ohio's rate of fire is limited due to absence of launching platform for each missile, while typhoon is not. Anyway typhoons are to be replaced with 4G Borei soon :(

  • @fmoa men the soviet submarine always entered in american waters they are quietest sub

  • @fmoa Does Ohio missiles has 10 MIRVed warheads too?

  • @fmoa claiming greater missile capacity only adds to the fact that America is often thought of as trigger happy; its not something to be proud of

  • @fmoa was the ohio class made to ensure the last strike from the ice of the north pole? No. Your argument is invalid.

  • @fmoa Typhoons can carry bigger nukes

  • @fmoa Joker, calms himself. He thinks we are the best and most technologically advanced, all win and establish democracy back home. All is not as written in the press and speaking a variety of experts in the U.S.. In the 90 years of the Russian submarine commander, sent birthday greetings to the captain of an American cruiser, sailing for him for 3 days. Now imagine that the boat launch 24 rockets typhoon on which to 6 warheads

  • I recon this song so well but i can't remeber where it comes from or what it's called! Does anyone know?

  • @MultiMartin94 It's the theme song of the movie "Crimson Tide". But I don't know the name of it.

  • @MultiMartin94

    Hans Zimmer

    Look for "Crimson Tide."