James Hansen is an expert. Everyone judging him is FAR FROM an expert. You are polical agenda parrots, who take it up the ass and like it. Big suckers for big business. Pathetic. Go get an education on the subject matter or shut up
Andy Lacis PhD, a colleague of Hansens at GISS, reviewer of the IPCC4 in 05' :
"There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department. The points being made are made arbitrarily with legal sounding caveats without having established any foundation or basis in fact. The Executive Summary seems to be a political statement that is only designed to annoy greenhouse skeptics."
I think it is up the the IPCC to present scientific data - not Lacis requirement. Lacis states that the Summary has conclusions that are not based on evidence AND that they should be based on evidence.
I don´t want to hear"scientists"talking about there children and using emotional physocolgy to manipulate people.This is a cheap trick and James Hansen should be ashamed of himself.
He is living in a fantasy would where he bows down to the almighty God of computer models.
This is why he talks about positive feedbacks because this is the single biggest flaw in the models,they have ONLY positive feedbacks.This is the fantasy he is living in.
Predictions instead of observations.A virtual world.
its because of dim-wits like you, of intellectually bankrupt people that the US is prevented from taking a leading role in curbing global warmiing, good job asshole. you're being led like a sheep by the corporate masters.
James Hansen has a PHD in the atmosphere of Venus of which he is an expert.
I know for a fact that you have never read through even one of the four reports that the IPCC has published, and if you were to read them it would be from a unquestioning, political and ideological perspective instead of a scientifically objective one.
Hansen is a climate change kook... He should be fired!
Slave2Reason 1 year ago
James Hansen is an expert. Everyone judging him is FAR FROM an expert. You are polical agenda parrots, who take it up the ass and like it. Big suckers for big business. Pathetic. Go get an education on the subject matter or shut up
bridgettedunn 2 years ago
I am neither "right wing" nor "left wing."
I am not part of that desructive and obstructive paradigm.
If you cannot see through Hansen´s ridiculous claims then you are a victim of two decades of steadily increasing propaganda.
Hansen is an environmentalist which obviously over-influences his career
I have read through the very first and the fourth report of the IPCC.
The catastrophic scenarios announced by Hansen and Gore do not actually exist in those reports.
arbide2 2 years ago
@arbide2 Ridiculous claims? Are you better climate expert than Hansen?
starrdreams 2 years ago
get a life!
arbide2 2 years ago
Andy Lacis PhD, a colleague of Hansens at GISS, reviewer of the IPCC4 in 05' :
"There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department. The points being made are made arbitrarily with legal sounding caveats without having established any foundation or basis in fact. The Executive Summary seems to be a political statement that is only designed to annoy greenhouse skeptics."
FreeAgain2 1 year ago
He have scientific data which contradicts Executive Summary?
starrdreams 1 year ago
I think it is up the the IPCC to present scientific data - not Lacis requirement. Lacis states that the Summary has conclusions that are not based on evidence AND that they should be based on evidence.
So it is up to the IPCC to defend their position.
FreeAgain2 1 year ago
I don´t want to hear"scientists"talking about there children and using emotional physocolgy to manipulate people.This is a cheap trick and James Hansen should be ashamed of himself.
He is living in a fantasy would where he bows down to the almighty God of computer models.
This is why he talks about positive feedbacks because this is the single biggest flaw in the models,they have ONLY positive feedbacks.This is the fantasy he is living in.
Predictions instead of observations.A virtual world.
Merany1 3 years ago
I thinks this is a cheap trick - to accuse Hansen in using cheap tricks.
starrdreams 3 years ago
You are talking about "fantasy he is living in". How you can be sure that you are not in fantasy?
starrdreams 3 years ago
its because of dim-wits like you, of intellectually bankrupt people that the US is prevented from taking a leading role in curbing global warmiing, good job asshole. you're being led like a sheep by the corporate masters.
sappo14 3 years ago
sappo14 says: "its because of dim-wits like you"
sappo14 - is it the best you can say in defend of your position - to make personal attacks?
starrdreams 3 years ago
You are an ass
bridgettedunn 2 years ago
Hi it´s Merany1 aka arbide2.
James Hansen has a PHD in the atmosphere of Venus of which he is an expert.
I know for a fact that you have never read through even one of the four reports that the IPCC has published, and if you were to read them it would be from a unquestioning, political and ideological perspective instead of a scientifically objective one.
arbide2 2 years ago
See link of new aticle in description ->>
starrdreams 3 years ago