Added: 11 months ago
From: ChineseHOME1
Views: 27,135
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (349)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • only the uzes were türks in xiongnu which ws multinational unio...mongols, manchus, ogurs, sbirs werent!

  • The Huns are the HUNGARIANS or MAGYAR s .Im Hungarian-Magyar and Atilla was second king of Hungary,today the world history have to be re wright. Xiounu s in chinese language,but there call them self UYGHUR s.China occupied they teritory same they did with Mongolia and Tibet.Please search on Youtube for Secret Chinese pyramids,then everybody can more to undersand.Uyghur people visiting every year Hungary for the festival as Magyar-sziget or Büsztörpuszta.

  • @vibuksi07 What?! Hungarians are Finno-Uggric people that have little to nothing to do with Huns! That is aside the fact that Huns occupied what is today Hungary they also occupy Romania and other parts of Europe. So that means Romanians are Huns aswell? Huns were Asitic Turkish-Mongolic horde that by time they got into Europe were more multicultural than anything else being Hun was more a "occupation" in way of speaking than a people a Germanic could be Hun most armies of Attila were

  • @vibuksi07

    they dont know that xiongnu wasnt hun only but multinational. hun, sabir, avar, daha, uze from scythian line mongol and manchu.

    türks were born in ad 552 from uzes and altaian common people. hungarians are hun, ogur (yuezhi, tochar) and sabir (magyar) unio.

  • China unlawfully occupaying state Xiang in chines in Hungarian UYGHUR territorys.Uyghurs are related to Hungarian-Magyar-Scitta-Hun Székely.Csángó.Avar-Kelta-Mong­ol people.This nationaltyes are not dead,just by diferent countrys ocupaied genocied,like Uyghurs -Mongols-Tibet by china.Székely or Szeklér or Csángó By Romanians and Ukrania.Hungarians-Magyars in Serbia-Croatia Slovakia.Please see TRIANON in 1920 the shame of Europa.Go to youtube and search for secret chinese pyramids.

  • I don't think their huns. Their called xiounu. Huns were the guys that invaded Rome but their origins were never found.

  • Dont you mean Tujue nit turik

  • THE REAL TURKS ARE THE CHINESE

  • The definition of Han in ancient history is different to the definition of present China.

  • One day the truth will emerge.Then they said to us ignorant barbarian kiss foots.

  • Ancient Turks were Mongoloid. Today, they are no longer a single race. Just like Latin American isnt a single race. The only thing that is shared is the original Mongoloid language.

  • @ogunelbetgelecek the real "turk" meaning is“ wrought iron” .because the whole turk are Special slave on cast iron .it means ancient turk not a single race,it is mixture of different people.the 柔然( Rouran)capture slave in different war.these slave who special on cast iron formed the original Turks

  • Sima Qian stated, based on preceding Chinese records (Bamboo Annals), that the Xiongnu's ruling clan were descendants of Chunwei (淳維 "Chun tribes"), possibly a son of Jie, the final ruler of the legendary Xia Dynasty (c. 2070–1600 BC).[10. According the Sima Qian, the first ruler of the Huns was Chinese.

  • LOL It's subtitled in Chinese ._.

  • interesting battle video, but in terms of accuracy for the title, the huns in fact rose to prominance in 450bc (ish), that would put them 150 years after the end of the Han dynasty. I assume this is actually depicting, a probebally oversized version of a border skirmish between the Xingnu people who were from the russian steppe region much like the later mongols. Of course we all know how that conflict finally ends 1000 or so years later...

  • huns wasnt turkey

    turk want to confuse the concept of huns and turk

  • @nimabgouzazhong Huns are roots of the Turks. This is historical and genetical fact. Where is confuse?

  • @ogunelbetgelecek it is lie.huns was kicked out by china in 2 century.in that time,turk have not formed. because the disappeared of huns .the left blank was filled by anothers nomadic nation.even in that time,turk still have not formed.i told you the really turk origin. the real turk in that time just a little slave tribe,you know,slave tribe.the whole turk are slave and be slaved by anothers nomadic nation 柔然(Rouran)

  • @ogunelbetgelecek Wikipedia states that Xiongnu had 89% North Asian genes and 11% European genes. Xiongnu were related to Northern Asians. All from Wikipedia. Scroll down Xiongnu page and read the genetics section. And Mongols now think they were Xiongnu. They just celebrated their establishment of Xiongnu Empire 209BC in 2011. I dont get it.

  • Mmm dog fleish hahahahaha fucking chinesesese hahahaaaaa little chinese cock ...xDDD

  • @TaTaro313 lol.donkey dick turk was kicked out by tang empire 

  • @TaTaro313 Come back to China Turkey shit. We'll smash your fucking flat faces again.

  • @DragonOfQin wuff wuff ....dog fleish xDDDDDDDDD ...2 cm cock xDDDD

  • Yeah ! KILL the chinese scum !

    HEIL HUNNIC EMPIRE !

  • china destory huns and kicked out huns to europe

    700 years later,tang dynasty kicked out turkeycock to west asia

    huns wasnt turkey cock

    turkeycock bullshit lie

  • huns have nothing relate with turkey cock

    the time gap are 700 years

    turkey cock are a slave tribe and slaved by 柔然Rouran

    turkeycock idiot have not formed in that time

    turkey cock say they have 10000 years history

    it is bullshit

  • @kaonimageilaozigun fuck you assholee....pig

  • @aazmzmettin haha,china kicked out barbarian pig to europe.such as huns and turkey cock,sorry,we havent kicked out all mongolia pig to europe.otherwise,today europe just a shit

  • Altaic is pretty similar. More similar to each other than any other group. But turan is something else entirely so it seems.

  • Mostly ruled by Hans. Hun never ruled China. They were defeated. Only Mongols and Manchu established dynasties. Mongol was close to 100 yrs. Manchu was over 200.

  • Most likely related. Huns were described with Mongoloid features.

  • Ming Dynasty also conquered Mongolia, but they failed to hold it in the long run. Ming used to hold routine expeditions into Mongolia almost like a game.

  • Turan and Turks are different things. Turan is more Persian centric. Turks are SinoCentric. Thats why you see Chinese art in the original Turkish culture.

  • Conspiracy theory

  • Comment removed

  • @DragonOfQin Kublai Khan was a pure mongol ! You must choose one side ! We don't respect you if you say you are Mongol Chinese ! As a real Mongol you must hate the Chinese so you aren't a pure Mongolian ! Don't offend on my Uighur brothers ! Uighurs are noble people ! Fuck you, you chinese Bastard !

  • long live TURKS (HUNS) !!!

    long live OGUZKHAN !!!

    fuck of china.

    UluTÜRKTimucin

  • But the legend say in the Turkish piramits in china, The Turanians turks will one time conquer china and later the world.

    i dont say this. its written in the piramits.

    the chinease goverment and the Vatikan know this true. but he want hiddin this secret.

    but knowwww we knowww ittttttttt hahah

    in the next years the world see the United Altai Turanian Turk Nations.

    coming soon ......

  • @MaLiveMaRulesMaGun What joke is it? whyy don't say that the Martian are alos Turksish and they will conquer all Galaxy?

  • @Emilechen I dont say that, This is Written in the Turkish Piramits in China, Written in the old Gokturk Runnic Typ. The Area today is Forbidden for Research.. the China Goverment say, this Area is a contaminated nuclear to scare people,

    but we have now the information, some chinesse work with our turks , so we get this information.

    there are mumies, lot of Runnic typs, and Maps about the world.

    and information about 5 plantets who people live

    you can belive me or not,

  • Historically when china was strong it always dominated mongolia and tashkent and samarkand.

    The future china will once again be the major power in mongolia and central asia.

  • no matter what they said chinese is greedy

  • Inner Mongolia. Its a Chinese Province.

  • Comment removed

  • Turks and Mongols are superior than China ! Turania-Altai !!! Chinese can fight ?!?! Joke !

  • @StyrianKhan

    What the fuck did you just say? China can fight you asshole. Who said they can't fight? China invented Kung fu and serveral other martial arts. And you said Chinese can't fight. Think before you say something.

  • @StyrianKhan Mongols aren't Turks you fucking shit. I am Mongolian Chinese and most of you Turks are fucking fake shit white fuckers. Dont steal Mongoloid Turk history u fucking shit. Unless you have tiny eyes, high cheekbones and a big head, you aint Turk.

  • @DragonOfQin A Mongolian Chinese !? Disgusting ! You shouldn't call yourself Mongolian ! To be a chinese is the biggest fail ! An Altaic Mongolian is honorably ! Turkic People are more related with Mongols than Chinese ! May Tengri ( Tanri ) bless and protect all Altaic People ! Fuck China and wannabe Mongolians !

  • @StyrianKhan

    I love you mate. The reality is that the Chinese didn't rule they country more than 400 years in last 2000 years, most of the time they were ruled by other peoples such as Huns (Mete Khan was never defeated by the Han dynasty in his entire life), Turkics (so called Wei dynasty was a Turkic kingdom), Mongols (so called Yuan) and Manchus (so called Qing). Mongols and Turkics burnt Beijing together and renamed it Khanbalikh. Chinese history is a story of losers. Fuck China!

  • @UighurKnight Thank you, my brother ! You're dead right ! One day the Turkic and Mongolic People will reunite and then we will punish China for their crimes ! Free Uighuristan ! Free Inner Mongolia ! Free Tibet ! Death to China !

  • @StyrianKhan Kublai Kahn was a pure Mongol but he called himself Great Kahn AND Chinese Emperor. What does that tell you?

  • @UighurKnight LOL Uyghur wet dream. Huns were in Europe. Xiongnu were not Huns. There is no evidence that proves that Huns had relations with Xiongnu. We smashed turks under Tang, we smashed Xiongnu under Han and Qin, we smashed Mongols under Ming and Song, Qing became Chinese wash and now Turkistan belongs to China. Keep living in your "Altaic" bs. Altaic is a language group not a genetic group piece of shit. Get an American education mother fucker.

  • Comment removed

  • @UighurKnight The mummies in Tarim Basin were not nomadic. Huns were just central asians. Xiongnu was a confederation of nomadic tribes just like the Mongols. Mongols became an identity forged under Genghis Kahn. Uyghurs had their own empire I know that! You're not my nightmare because there are many Chinese Mongols, Manchus, Xianbei, Khitansall assimilated in2 Han culture under CCP. We will defend China with our lives. I am Mongol/Han. My ancestor was general in Yuan.

  • @DragonOfQin

    Where did you do your history? I don't want to discuss Hunnic and Uighur history with you. Just tell me the institution where you did your history. I'll just note it as the college of Dickheads in my notebook, that's it. You protect it with your lives? should I cry or laugh at you mate, 40,000 Chinese ran away to Gansu on the second day of the Urumchi protest organised by unarmed Uighurs. Do you think they will stand against NATO troops if NATO attacks China one day?

  • @UighurKnight History from AP World in US. Now you're getting off topic.

  • @DragonOfQin

    No I'm not, as I said, any institution's writer who doesn't know at least one of the Turkic languages and Hungarian makes his institution silly by writing anything about this topic. Do you think we should write Chinese history without knowing any Chinese? I'm still wondering who is gonna protect China with their lives. People who organise 180000 protests a year? Are all "Chinese Mongols" gonna protect China? How many percent of the "Chinese Mongols" would do that? Can you tell me?

  • @UighurKnight Based on UN statistics inner Mongolian ethnic groups are growing by 2.33% compared to outer mongolians who are growing by 1.6%. China now holds the most Mongolians. Inner Mongolians can still use their traditional scripts while Outer Mongolians have to adapt to the Russian ones. I have 2 uncles from my dad's side who are Mongolians and they are proud Mongol Chinese! They are the ones who bothered to find out the family's ancestors in which one them was a General in Yuan. Proud!!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @UighurKnight You see the thing is Mongols under China living in inner Mongolia have a good standard of living. Mongols in inner Mongolia are growing by 2.33% while Outer Mongolians are growing by 1.6%.(UN statistics) So how can other Mongols fight China when 1) China has the most mongolians 2) Mongolians are living good lives. Both my uncles travel in and out of China while they live in South East Asia for their businesses. Mongolians are living well in China besides Hans.

  • @DragonOfQin

    Yeah maybe half Chinese Mongols (like you) are living better than others. How many percent of the Mongols can you represent? There's a Mongol community in Australia. Do you think you can get 30% of the vote if you want to represent them? We don't need Mongols from outside invade China again. But Uighurs, Tibetans, Mongols and those 180,000 protests/per year organiser Chinese people are enough to be your nightmare. Anyway, do you think you have answered my previous question?

  • @UighurKnight I already gave you the statistics of Mongols in China. You need 2 ask yourself this simple Question. Why does China have the most Mongols in the world? Mongols in China are GROWING at a rate of 2.33% compared to Outer Mongolia 1.6%. (UN stats) Also Mongolians in China can use traditional script unlike Outer Mongolians who use Russian.

  • @DragonOfQin

    Why you are allowed to be proud of your general great great great grand father, and why I don't have that right to be proud of my Minister grand father in China? Dose growing Mongolian population mean that all Mongols protect China with their lives? How many percent of those growing Mongols does your (half Chinese) words represent? Answer me directly, you don't need be afraid of saying some thing wrong, this is not China, this is the free world. take your time mate.

  • @UighurKnight You see I live in a Westernize world for better education and opportunities so I am not "brainwashed" like what you Westernized ppl like to say. I can guarentee you that the majority of Mongol Chinese agree with what I say. I always hear about Dalai Lama but never about the Uyghurs or the Mongols. The CCP actions speak for themselves and many Mongols in China are grateful about it. There is a reason why China has the most mongols in the world.

  • @DragonOfQin

    So, China has the most Uighurs there, is that because most Uighurs are grateful with the Chinese? (keep in mind, China confiscated ALL Uighurs' passports in 2006). Only half Chinese Uighurs (like you) are allowed to have passports. You can tell your "Chinese Mongol" jokes to your Pakistani roommates. I know many people from the Australian Mongol community, unlike you, they are Mongols. The westerners know whom to believe mate. You don't need to hear about Uighurs, we are everywhere

  • @UighurKnight Uyghurs are not Mongols. I am Mongol Chinese. I have relatives living in China and some are mongols from my dad's side. They are fine with China. Many Uyghurs have contributed to CCP China. The first regiment of PLA in the 1962 Indian invasion were Uyghurs. Uyghurs had already spilled blood for China. Uyghurs like you make those PLA uyghur soldier efforts in vain. PS: Gov of Xinjiang is Uyghur and leader of Congress of CCP is Uyghur as well.

  • @DragonOfQin Yes, the East Turkistan national army was branded as the 5th Division of the PLA. And they won the Indian war but 45000 troops disappeared on the Himalaya mountains because the CCP cut all the supplements. and their general Memtimin Iminof (my best friend's grand father) was shot by the CCP police in his own office in 1963. Xinjiang's governor is a Uighur Chinese appointed by Beijing not elected by us. I told you to tell your stories to your Pakistani roommates, they believe it.

  • @UighurKnight I am pretty sure XinJiang's Gov Uyghur has no Han blood. He looks really white to me. Anyways I don't really know about these consipracy theories. China seems really vibrant and nice. Good to do business there.

  • @DragonOfQin

    Conspiracy theories? lol it seems commies are learning "Capitalism" from those neo-cons in the US. hahahha. We have a culture of adding Akhun after men's name, ex:Memetakhun. akhun came from Ak Hun which means White Hun). Hunnic and so called Xiong Nu elements are everywhere in Uighur life. You don't really know about many things mate.if you don't know any one of the Turkic languages and Hungarian, it's better for you to shut up about Uighur or Hungarian history.

  • @UighurKnight But Uyghurs are not nomadic so they can't be related to GokTurks/Mongols/Xiongnu. Mongols celebrate their establishment under Xiongnu! Uyghurs were just victims of Xiongnu invasions thus one sees Xiongnu elements in Uyghur life. But Uyghurs don't practice nomadic lifestyles.

  • Comment removed

  • @UighurKnight You lack knowledge of Chinese history and Mongol history. Mongolia celebrates their formation and establishment under Xiongnu state 209BC just like how China celebrates their formation and establishment under Qin 221BC.

  • @DragonOfQin

    Which history should I tell you? The Chinese-Mongol "history" which I learnt in high school in China or the history I learnt in the university in Australia?

  • @UighurKnight My history is from AP World history US in high school. I didn't learn history from China my friend. I already told you from my previous posts that I am American educated. -_- Sir knight tell me both sides of the story. I wana know Chinese history and aussie history of China. Very much thanks. Perhaps sent me message so I could absorb more knowledge and you wont have to post many comments at once. Thanks.

  • @DragonOfQin

    Is American English very different from the Australian one? Who said you studied in China? I said I did so, I am aware of the nice stories (propaganda) of the Chinese history mate. I know Chinese, Turkish, English and Uighur, So, we can take examples from the Chinese sources but how about the Uighur sources? (Tunyuquq Menggu teshi written in 720s, Turkiy Tillar Diwani written in 900s...). You can't read Turkish or Uighur, How can I discuss history with you?

  • @UighurKnight Translate it for me duhhhhh.

  • @DragonOfQin

    ok i will write to you as message soon :)

  • @UighurKnight thanks! you seem pretty friendly for a seperatists. lolololol.

  • @DragonOfQin

    lol it's like the propaganda of the neo-cons in US to label Muslims as terrorists. What I say about those FOX and CNN propaganda is, turn those bloody crap off and talk to the Muslims, ask any question you have, believe me you will learn something unexpected. About Uighur "separatists", the same, turn the bloody CCTV off and talk to the Uighurs, you will learn something you've never thought of before.the "terrorist" organisation: the world uighur congress is a pro dialogue group.

  • @StyrianKhan I can call myself a Mongol Chinese because my ancestors from my dad's tree were Generals under Yuan. I am very proud of that and if I am a disgrace then one can say that Kublai was also a disgrace to Mongols. Altaic is a disputed language group. It was never a genetic/race group. I am Mongol Chinese American educated. Proud Mongol Chinese.

  • hahaha hey everybody wanna hear a joke?...KOREA! lol hahahaha

  • the whole battle is just them running at each other.

  • Hunlar TÜRK'dür

    HUN = TÜRK

  • Turk=/= huns = xiongnu in some sense.

  • @lovehomelandchina You say is right! The overwhelming majority of Turks are descendants of people Tiele, only a small part of the descendants of the Huns!

  • @ChineseHOME1

    yeah, we can trace the origin of huns, who appeared during the eras of 'All Men are brothers', but han and xiongnu were bad brothers to each other though they have blood linage.

  • @lovehomelandchina I agree with you 100%.

  • TURK = HUN

  • @jackwilshere006 Wrong, not in Chinese term of Huns, they are mainly Mongols or Xiongnu, and are han people's distant cousins over 4000 years ago, there's no blood relationship between Turks in Turkey and Mongols today.

  • Never heard about this battle!!! One of rare victory of chinese...

  • @sbbold You can look at Wikipedia, there are sino-xiongnu war! Or google search sino-xiongnu war! If you think this is fake look at the Han Dynasty history book!

  • 對此影片做出回應... This is often a matter in China! Eliminated Hun Han empire! Tang, successful eradication of the East. Western Turks Empire! Ming Dynasty, the success of the Mongols out of China, and has eliminated the Mongols into the Mongolian steppe! Also Ming has successfully conquered the Manchurian! 

  • @ChineseHOME1 theres still mongols in northen china

  • @ChineseHOME1 are they using stirrups in this video?

  • wers the assassins army

  • Scythian spoke an Iranic language. Huns spoke Mongol-Turkic. If there were Scythians in the confederation, then they would have been forced to speak Mongol Turkic.

  • There were red, blue, black, and white Huns. Colors representing geographic directions. It had nothing to do with race. The Hun's first Shang Yu was Chun Wei. The last emperor of the Xia Dynasty.

  • @Lordofthenipplerings Totally agree, there is numerous unfounded nonsense as a part of Huns were white not Asian/mongoloid which is created by pathetic Hungarians that do think Hungarians are always white.

  • The Scythian-Caspian captial was in connection with Ordos…

    For example:Csécsi - Zhizhi Chanyu was already running the Scythian-Caspian empire too..

    „The ultimate "origins" of, both, Scythian culture and historic groups remains a focus of academic debate.”

    „What is certain is that, during the Iron Age, a broadly similar Scythian culture flowered in a vast zone from the eastern European steppe to the Altai Mountains.”

    So from China untill Hungary it was similar cultures Hun-Saka....

  • Han Dynasty was an East Asian ancient Chinese dynasty, Han Dynasty had absolutely NOTHING to do with white huns.

  • Oh, and I forgot to mention, some African nationalists even claim that ancient Chinese are black.

    If this trend of claiming chinese history continues, then we might get a funny result in the end: ancient chinese is everyone in the world.

  • Everyone starts to make their own version of Chinese history. Korean nationalists think that ancient Chinese are Koreans, Pan-Altaic nationalists think that ancient Chinese are Southeast Asians. And now we have a westerner who claims that ancient Chinese are Huns. Isn't this funny and ridiculous, my Chinese friends?

  • The Hans and White Huns were enemies

    the Hans were only friends with certain Black Hun(eastern xiiongu) tribes, of course they were manipulating them so fake friends lol…

    Modu Chanyu was not white hun actually …

    „Hun nobility of DNA has been identified as N + C3!” by who?

    „French scientists found a Xiongnu period tomb” ok lol there is also one french historian conlcuded that Xia was not Chinese dynasty…

    but based on one tomb he solved the whole Xiongnu history/period ? lol .

  • it's not a fact that the huns were of turko/mongol origin,most modern historians beleave that the huns had nothing to do with the xiongnu.

  • @neobogard

    „the similarity of Xiongnu and Hunnic cauldrons, which were buried on river banks both in Hungary and in the Ordos.[25]:”

    They found the same Saman-bowl-cauldron in Ordos and Hungary so the connection between Hun-Xiongnu is 100% fact…

  • @JohnGoldboom But the huns had diferant traditions then the xiongnu,the huns would practice scaring the face and bending parts of the skull out of shape wich the xiongnu did not do,most modern historians say even if the original huns were central asian,most of attilas huns were european.

  • @neobogard

    I think scraing the face is probably just battle scars lol but Artificial cranial deformation (ancient egyptians also did this) is probbaly true yes no evidence if xiongnu ever did that so maybe in future they will find some who knows but it’s not really proof both Huns and Xiongnu is totaly mystery still …

    But finding the same „bowl” 10k miles/km apart eachother is hardcore evidence.. that proves some kind of relation for sure..

  • @neobogard

    Of course most of the Huns were white because not the whole Xiongnu confederation left but (White)Huns only… Manchurians,Mongols etc obviously stayed lol

    At 360 Huns flooded the silk road and the prepeartions began, Huns canceled the treaty with Rome and demanded all Pannonia back. Goths,Alans etc..were under Hun command…

  • @JohnGoldboom so attila was white?.

  • @JohnGoldboom

    Just a simple logic. If ancient Chinese were Huns, then there would be NO wars between Han Dynasty and Xiongnu, between Han and Xianbei, or between Song Dynasty and mongol, or between Tang Dynasty and Gokturks. What's the point of fighting each other if they were the same?

  • @JohnGoldboom what do you mean by white huns of asia?.i'm pretey shore that if the huns were actually white,it is because they are european.the xiongnu of asia was pure asian,there was no whites amongst them,if you're talking about sythians,they were had noyhing to do with turko/mongol xiongnu.

  • @neobogard

    I'm pretty sure that he is just an insecure white guy who gains his pride from distorting asian history. Just look at how he desperately tried to prove that ancient Chinese Han Dynasty was built by white huns.

  • @TheXanian i kind of agree with some of the things he says,historians do agree that most of attila'a huns were white,but the white huns of asia were iranic and had little to nothing to do with the turko/mongol xiongnu of asia,there is evidence that they were only conected by a turkic language wich some of the northern tribes of white huns spoke as a way of communication.

  • @neobogard

    You are probably right, most of the Xiongnu tribes were pure Oriental Asians, although they might have a slight mixture with Central Asian white men. The Huns, on the other hand, probably were mostly white.

    I think the French scientists found a Xiongnu period tomb in Mongolia in 2007, and they analysed the corpses, then they concluded that most of the Xiongnu were East Asians.

  • @neobogard

    And his claim that Chinese Han Dynasty emperors were white huns is completely nonsense. I don't know how he came up with that idea. Ancient Chinese were pure East Asians, even more pure than the Xiongnu.

  • @TheXanian Turks are pure East Asians too dumb jerk. Mongol, Turk, Krgyzyz, Kazakh, Manchu, Tungus, Korean all are based on same ancestry.

  • @immortaltendency

    You are just another brainless pan-altaic nationalist.

    The existence of altaic language family is still a controversial topic. Some linguistics say it exists, others say it does not exist. The haplogroups among different "altaic" populations are also very different.

    I would not consider turks as pure East Asians, since most of turks are either white or mixed-raced.

  • @TheXanian you have to understand the turk as a nationality,yes most of the people of turkey arn't real turks, but the kazakhs,kyrgyz,uzbeks,tatars,w­etern mongols,tuvans and oygurs of western china are all turks.mete(modu) han is the father of all turks,the ashina tribe of northern mongolia/southern saiberia is were tuks originated from,so yes,turks are pure asians aldo the western turkic countrys ,hungary,bulgaria and tukey have heavaly mix with the locals,they are still turks.

  • @neobogard

    But those ethnicities that you listed are still more or less mixed.

    And I'm not talking about pure asians, I'm talking about pure East Asians.

  • @neobogard

    I don't know why this debate has become a debate about turks. I'm not really familiar with turk history and I don't really want to discuss about the origin of turks, and I'm NOT interested about mixed-raced turks.

    That JohnGoldboom annoyed me NOT because he claimed that Xiongnu or Huns are white, but because he claimed that ancient Chinese Han Dynasty was built by white huns. That's completely nonsense.

  • @TheXanian i was replying to your post with immortaltendancy about turks.yes you are right about white huns having nothing to do with east asians,or even central asians.my discusion with JohnGoldboom was about attila's huns being white,wich historians do agree with,but then he started saying that the xiongnu was run by white huns of asia,wich is far from the truth,white huns are iranic and have nothing to do with the xiongnu.

  • @neobogard You must be a joke, how did Huns be both white and be in East Asia?

    The Huns from Asia has came to the white view and lost its East Asian view by marriying with locals of the soils that conquered by Huns.

  • @immortaltendency i never said huns of east asia were white,i said white huns of asia had nothing to do with east and central asia.and yes,huns of europe was originaly turko/mongol and then mix in with the locals,i agree so what's your point?.

  • @neobogard What is white Huns you dumbass? Huns are already Mongoloid people.

  • @immortaltendency why are you being offencive? are you twelve or something.and as for white huns,do some reserch,they were a group of iranic people who lived in central asia befor the xiongnu came and kicked them out ,where they moved to afganistan.but they have nothing to do with the huns of asia or the huns of europe,they were called hun buy the persions because some of the northern tribes of white huns spoke a turkic lanuage as a form of communication with the turko/mongols.

  • @neobogard Kill yourself dumb loser Huns were unity of Altaic people not Persian and they had raised towards against Europe and lately their countries, Bulgaria, Hungary and Ottoman Empire born.

    you assumptions shows your ignorance.

  • @immortaltendency man are you retarted,why don't you try to understand the comment befor posting.WHITE HUNS OF ASIA HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TURKO MONGOL HUN AND THE HUNS OF EUROPE.yes,the true huns are asian,but i was just answering your question about the white huns of asia who were a group of iranic people who lived in central asia befor the true huns came and kicked them out ,where they moved to afganistan.

  • @neobogard Huns kicked and Huns related with Iranic? hahaaha you're trying to show yourself ridiculous or your logic is kinda fucked up, Huns conquered europe and Huns has came to white look by Slavic and Aryanic locals not Iran is all i have to say to you.

  • @immortaltendency dude just don't worry about it,let's just say you're mostly right.and stop it at that.

  • @neobogard

    Atilla’s army had asian/eruaisan units also, many/most tribes sent soldiers but those tribes population stayed becasue Huns moved totally to Hungary so all women/children not just soldiers…

    Xiongu was not pure asian it was asian,eurasian,europid mix. Like imagine E.U. today 1 tribe is 1 country so every tirbe/country is different…Today Xiongnu union would be like a union of 30 countries or something..

    The original Hun had 24 tribes but Xiongnu had newcomers too ...

  • @neobogard

    When I said (White)Huns I meant the Huns so not Black Hun tribes, yellow huns, blue huns so many tribes called themselves huns..

    Xiongnu confederation was like =Huns,Avars,Turks,Mongols,Manc­hurains,Cumans-Prechenges, Uz-Oguz,Mansi-Hanti,Baskirs, Uyghurs,Tatars,Tungusic, Jurchens,Juans, Hokiens etc..

    the Huns and Sctyhians were related very similar cultures…

    Scthyians already had tribes Central-eastern eruope arund 4000B.C. so what iranians lol? ..

    Wiki: The Sredny Stog culture..

  • @TheXanian Bla bla bla. i feel sorry for pathetic Chinese people fate of the Chinese people is getting plundered by Huns and Marxist status quo. Hun empire and Gokturk empire was based on East Asia and empire of Bulgarians, Turks, Hungarians, Mongols, Tungus, Manchus, Kazakhs, Krgyzyz, Uyghurs and other pure East Asian humans so some tribes of them were bored with plundering Chinese and conquest Europe and they had the Indo-European or Aryan look. there is no need for your ignorant theses.

  • Psamtik I Egyptians Pharaoh around 620B.C. ordered the priest of Thebes to move the Karnak temple of life to Ordos Saman-Magus center, becasue accroding to their fortune teller preists it will be in danger in future.

    So all the ancient-secret knowldege including the secrets of the pyramids etc..was transfered to Ordos with scythian help The ruling Chinese families knew about this and therefore they had represantives in Ordos assuring the safety so this is why the Great-Wall goes around Ordos..

  • The clothings, hairstyles and customs in Tom Cruise's The Last Samurai (in Japan) are far more Han Chinese (and Han China) alike than Jacky Chen's Shanghai Noon which is Manchu.

    The clothing and hair styles of Crunching Tiger Hidden Dragon and most of Jet Li's retro movies are ALL Manchu, not Han Chinese, darn it!

  • @MrRedeeps

    You are correct. The real Han Chinese costume is Hanfu, while Qipao and Cheongsam are both Manchurian costumes. The pigtail hairstyle is also a Manchurian hairstyle.

    Japanese and Koreans copied many things from ancient Han Chinese dynasties. Japanese kimono and Korean hanbok are both based on ancient Han Chinese dress.

  • Ancient China refers to classical Han (Chinese) China. Yet "ancient" China in ALL Hollywood productions (assisted by a clown called Jacky Chen for instance) are Ch'ing Dynasty Machu China of the last 200 years -not Han Chinese at all.

    Ancient Han Chinese civilisation are't dead, just being suppressed by the Communism. To observe some of ancient Han Chinese clothings, hair styles, customs in today's world, one needs to look at classical "Japan" as it's largely a copy/paste of Tan China.

  • @KoreaTerriory Only the Mongols ruled China for 90 years!South Korea as China's slave over 2000! There is no doubt!

  • @ChineseHOME1

    俯首稱臣的泡菜~

  • @tp61i6c042002 薱!

  • @KoreaTerriory diot! Goguryeo never ruled China! Shameless thieves, only to take advantage of (AD313 years) China war, the occupation of the Korean Peninsula and Liaodong Peninsula of China! Only the Mongols ruled China for 90 years, as the Manchu conquered China's Ming Dynasty once they!

  • @KoreaTerriory

    Free Dokdo, Dokdo is NOT gook territory, Dokdo's real name is Takeshima and it belongs to Japan.

  • @KoreaTerriory

    Chinese Ming Dynasty saved your gook women's ass from Japanese invaders in 1592 during the Imjin War. If the Ming Dynasty didn't help you gooks, then you gooks would be raped by the Japs in 1592. You gooks should be thankful to we Chinese because we helped to keep your pathetic race alive.

    Remember that your joseon gook kings used to kowtow to Ming Dynasty ambassadors.

  • @KoreaTerriory

    Goguryeo was defeated by the allied army of Chinese Tang Dynasty and Silla gooks. Silla is the real ancestor of gooks, and Silla was the enemy of Goguryeo.

    Korean history = Han Chinese slave mongolian slave japanese slave north korean soviet slave south korean american slave

  • @KoreaTerriory

    Dokdo belong to Japan!!!!! Free Dokdo!!!!!

  • @KoreaTerriory

    Funny to see low IQ inferiority complexed dogs from korea barking nonstop in chinese history videos.

  • @KoreaTerriory

    Ancient Korea was a tributary of Ancient China for thousands of years.

  • @KoreaTerriory

    Korean = slave of Han Chinese and slave of Japanese

  • @KoreaTerriory

    This video has nothing to do with your gooks. Go to watch your gook videos, ugly kimchi gook.

  • Long live Han Dynasty!

    Han Dynasty is the pride of Han Chinese ethnicity!

    Han Dynasty fucked up Huns!

  • Everyday we comment on how mongolia defeats china, or how china rapes taiwan, or how hongkong is better than china, and china is not anchuria, and that bull shit about tibet. I wNT PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND HAN CHINESE IS NOT ALL OF CHINA!!! Mongols are one chinese tribe, tibetians were one tribe, and taiwan or hongkong were chinese land that were colonized or seperated, including mongolia. Han is just the most populated tribe of china out of the 53 left. Chinese people should work together!

  • THE  HUNS ARE GERMANS. THE HANS ARE TURKO- MONGOLS

  • @unfukkkmee

    Han are Chinese, Huns are Uralic or Altaic.

    Han Dynasty was one of the most powerful dynasties in Chinese history.

  • @TheXanian HANS  ARE MONGOL CHINESE.

    HUNS ARE GERMANS

  • @unfukkkmee

    Go to learn some history before you post your ignorant comments. Han Dynasty is a ancient Chinese dynasty.

  • @unfukkkmee

    And Han Dynasty had NOTHING to do with mongols.

    Mongols did not exist at that time. Mongols appeared a thousand years later during Song Dynasty.