LOL ive been following your vids and up to this point you seemed very intelligent and I completely followed along and understood but denying evolution (which is happening right in front of our eyes), and literally shoving words (that no sane scientist has every spoken) down the throat of science, is beyond a crime to your own mind. wow. Why do philosophical whackjobs think in terms of spirit OR science ... no it's both, at the same time. don't destroy your arguement by denying fact.
@ForToday03 Evolution is evident on the 'physical' level,however,the emergence of biological forms into our physical experience occurs over time,reality is created at a pre-physical level beyond time existing 'at once' like a story for our perspective.An author may write a story that covers years, each chapter building on the previous one; the writer may have conceived the story in minutes,perhaps he wrote the ending before the beginning,the second chapter didn't evolve from the prvious one.
@ForToday03 No..Nothing is pre-determined; by our choices,we co-create our own reality;but, all possible manifestations of creaturehood already exist in a larger dimensional framework of reality
Darwinism is the biggest joke and the most dangerous lie of all times, just next second to the trinity.Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Moselini,Mao Zitung, WWI and II, Colonialism, rasism, nationalism,Apartheid are some of fruits of Darwinims.Hitler and Stalin wrote that Darwinism was their prime force in their ideology and actions.
Exellent facts, it is exactly what happening. People wondering why people are like this and like that, why there is war and conflicts.Why children are as they are today.Youth became so arrogant and without empathy or compasion. It is a up side down world. There came some year ago extra ordinary Super evidence against Darwinism fraud , called The Atlas oF ceation.These books shocked entire European univerities, they had to ban these books, coz its powerful impact.
For someone who bases their beliefs so strongly on the realism of quantum physics, you certainly are cynical concerning evolution and cosmology
Also, we are the ancestors of murderers. Our history is scarred with war and strife, AND our culture happily perpetuates the exploitation of other species.
@JamesJTraitz Sure, neo-freudians are few and far in between, but the mechanism of natural selection is rock solid. Do you deny selection's explanatory capabilities, its empirical validity, its rationality, or its implication (or whatever you object to)?
@TheShukuga the 'motive force' of "evolution" is not natural selection but consciousness' own ,inherant drive towards excellence ,quality or 'value fulfillment
ok all you self righteous athiests,out there. can't you see. your just as dogmatic as the religious zelots you critisize.just admit you don't know.I've had inexplicable events occur in my life that happened without your or my consent.just like the earth continues to revolve around the sun with or without us capitulating to its existence.
@rationalanarchy Fine- define gravity ...what actually is it and what produces it? You forget that beyond three-dimensional reality is a larger dimension of actuality from which the physical /camouflage forms emerge...they all exist at once in a 'pre-physical' state of being and then manifest through a series of events that we interpret as "time" which,incidently does not exist
I DREAM OF THE DAY WHEN SCIENTISTS WILL BE ALLOWED TO TEST ACIDS, CHEMICALS AND DRUGS ON CREATIONISTS, INSTEAD OF ANIMALS, I DREAM OF THE DAY WHEN WE GROW CREATIONISTS IN FARMS AS SLAVES, SO WE DO NOT HAVE TO WORK, I DREAM OF THE DAY WE BEAT UP CREATIONISTS FREELY WHENEVER WE ARE STRESSED, I DREAM OF THE DAY WE CAN TIE CREATIONISTS ON OUR CAR BUMPERS 4 FUN, I DREAM OF THE DAY CREATIONISTS ASSUME THEIR PROPER ROLE IN LIFE, AS MINDLESS SLAVES. dont blame me i watched their unintelligent videos
I DREAM OF THE DAY WHEN SCIENTISTS WILL BE ALLOWED TO TEST ACIDS, CHEMICALS AND DRUGS ON CREATIONISTS, INSTEAD OF ANIMALS, I DREAM OF THE DAY WHEN WE GROW CREATIONISTS IN FARMS AS SLAVES, SO WE DO NOT HAVE TO WORK, I DREAM OF THE DAY WE BEAT UP CREATIONISTS FREELY WHENEVER WE ARE STRESSED, I DREAM OF THE DAY WE CAN TIE CREATIONISTS ON OUR CAR BUMPERS 4 FUN, I DREAM OF THE DAY CREATIONISTS ASSUME THEIR PROPER ROLE IN LIFE, AS MINDLESS SLAVES. dont blame me i watched their unintelligent videos
This idiot looks like a mature adult but his grasp of natural science, esp evolution, is so childish and full of outright lies that I'm amazed and dumbfound.
I am fairly certain (right around 100% certain) that survival of the fittest does not translate to "killed off weaker biological forms." Just because a creature does not exist does not mean that it was killed off. SURVIVAL of the fittest means that certain organisms SURVIVED conditions better then others. Nowhere does that directly imply that they killed everything that does not exist. If killing others would be the only way to evolve how would there exist more herbivores than carnivores?
This is so unjustified in nearly all ways. If you are going to make such statements (which are potentially very interesting), it is essential to provide some sort of explanation, not just a set of 'facts'.
Think of it this way: Nothing in Darwin's theory rules out God or the soul nor does it rule out that God created the entire evolutionary process,a priori, or at once (outside of time) and 'allows' it to unfold 'in time' the way a movie unfolds on the screen
I could not agree more with the above and i think you will find it hard to find an eminent atheist who would maintain that it does. Even Dawkins, who is admired as a leading neo-darwinist, does not claim to be able to disprove God with 100% certainity (see his debate with Alister McGrath) and if you are right (i am in the UK) about your teaching system that is very worrying.
(cont) However, i would caution you not to be too hasty about simply introducing metaphysical notions or even 'hypothetical physics' into the class room. There needs to be some criteria for what we should teach in schools and i think that is the core question. As i am sure you are aware, the FSM is a fantastic warning against simply reverting from 'traditional science' and cornforming to more 'contraversial' science on the basis of its popularity.
So my response is, if indeed you are right about the state of school curriculum and you are appreciative enough to see that your 'factual' existential claims at the begining of this video are far from widely accepted, what criteria are you arguing should be used to make up a 'non-limited' view?
That evolution theory adequatly explains our physical experience ; however quantum mechanics and realitivity alerts us that time is bounded and of limited relevence , so we must look 'elsewhere' for the true explainations of man's existence. That quantum physics,ancient zen buddhism and reaitivity theory all point to a reality that is subjective and influenced by the mind of Man!
Are you seriously positing that we try and teach young children postmodernism&modern physics? i find these notions challenging (and without wanting to be egotistical) i have a place at Oxford University to study maths&philosophy. With all due respect, i hope you realise that you notions of a subjective reality etc are far from factual. So i am saying we cannot (at the moment) establish a 'truth' that will satisfies all top academics so what criteria should we use for selecting teaching material?
Agreed. We should begin with a variation of what we teach now and introduce to the young and developing minds the implications of what realitivity and quantum theory suggest
As long as we are taught that we live in a 'survival of the fittest' world where there is no greater power or soul the mentality of "kill or be killed" will hold sway! Biologically ,big fish eat the smaller fish,we have predators and prey-yet there is a vast spiritual dimension of actuality which is our birthright.You can not expand into a 'larger' dimension of being (where your thoughts instantly manifest)until you begin to take responsibility for the thoughts that you direct towards others!
So angry,so freightened.School ed. is fine-as far as it goes-a great place to start,but I wouldn't whant to live there- I have seen attacks like yours before...fearfull to have the little bit of knowledge you have be challenged.Tell you what,why don't you stop tuning in here and stick to yesterdays knowledge,beliefs and teachings---just think ,no more knew ideas to scare you!
You COMPLETELY misunderstand evolution. And Sigmund Freud, as insightful as he was, is not technically "science", as anyone in the field of psychology that he fathered will easily tell you.
If you can make such GROSS mistakes with such simple concepts i do not even wanna get into what you do to quantum physics.
Your methods are ridiculous, your conjectures loosely based on poor understanding of common scientific principles are laughable.
I think it is you that does not understand.You confuse evolution with natural selection.Evolution 'plays out' in our experience but is not based on nor caused by physical forms changing. It all exists pre-physically at once and emerges into our experience through a medium that we interpret as passage of time. I agree with you re: Sigmund Freud.
I think James explained rather well "What and How" teachers are implanting in our minds. When we get out of the institution, that is the core foundation of our belief; No god, it's your ego/id, no after life, it's only you peanial gland...
I think you (don) are likely one of those no longer able to share/acquire knowledge in simple terms. I would not want to talk about quantum physics or how the brain is actualy able to flip qbit with you either.
To christians: You realize that your religion is the result of stolen concepts and rituals from pagan religions, correct? That is established fact. Therefore, any new 'information' appended is invalid when the whole composition is considered. Individually, there may be pieces of wisdom articulated at different depths, but claims to the throne of the universe and ethics out of the bible are invalid. A 'god' shouldn't have to rely on plagiarism.
"Blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your descendants as the stars of the heaven and as the sand which is on the seashore; and your descendants shall possess the gate of their enemies."
"As the host of heaven cannot be numbered, nor the sand of the sea measured, so will I multiply the descendants of David My servant and the Levites who minister to Me."
Even today, scientists admit that they do not know how many stars there are. Only about 3,000 can be seen with the naked eye. We have seen estimates of 10^21 stars - which is a lot of stars. The number of grains of sand on the earth's seashores is estimated to be 10^25. As scientists discover more stars, wouldn't it be interesting to discover that these two numbers match?
The Bible describes the circulation of the atmosphere around the globe. It was not known the Earth had global atmospheric patterns until the 18th century.
Sperm cells live 1 to several hrs. outside the body, and cells weren't discovered until the 17th century. Because the Bible was inspired directly by God and is His creation, the Bible knew this 2,000 yrs ago:
[16] And if any man's seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the even.
[17] And every garment, and every skin, whereon is the seed of copulation, shall be washed with water, and be unclean until the even.
"That's fine but your claim that the solar system should be filled with human life 3500 times is completely wrong and that is based on mathematics. It is impossible for the human population to reach that amount."
It was a mathematical observation that mankind is nowhere near as old as evolutionists claim.
Sperm cells live 1 to several hrs. outside the body, and cells weren't discovered until the 17th century. Because the Bible was inspired directly by God and is His creation, the Bible knew this 2,000 yrs ago:
[16] And if any man's seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the even.
[17] And every garment, and every skin, whereon is the seed of copulation, shall be washed with water, and be unclean until the even.
It was a mathematical observation that mankind is nowhere near as old as evolutionists claim. Math proves the population would exceed it's current size outrageously. It was not a proposal that people should could survive. Carrying capacity is not a factor. The number of children per couple throught the ages is known from literary history. Had this rate begun when evolutionists claim man evolved (200,000 yrs ago - 1M yrs ago) the earth would have become insanely overpopulated long, long ago.
But friend, the universe is winding down. Entropy is occuring. It is dying a heat death and dissintegration. Complexity and order do not arise naturally. Sorry.
"Science is quite good at studing the 'outsideness' of God's creation!"
Outsideness? You mean, stupefying complexity isd not an indication of design? We know that nature does not create order, organization, or complexity. And the cosmos aren't alive either. Matter has no brain, no cognitive capacity or process.
"Science is quite good at studing the 'outsideness' of God's creation!"
It also verifies the Bible in numerous ways. Most of the major events of the Bible have been verified with science: the crossing of the Red Sea, Sodom and Gommorah, Tower of Babel, confusion of languages (72 to be exact), the burned mountain Sinai, existance of King David, nephilim, etc.
I know you don't study these matters, but you need. I asked you a question. Are you a memeber of the Illuminati or Freemasons?
Retina cells are astonishingly complex. To simulate 10 seconds of the complete processing of a single cell of the retina of the human eye would require solution of 500 simultaneous nonlinear differential equasions 100 times, and would take several minutes of processing time on a Cray Supercomputer. How do random genetic mutations design such an apparatus?
People like this gentleman proclaim truths, in the name of science, while remaining completely ignorant of what science demonstrates.
Estimates of the TL human pop. at the time of Christ are about 300M. If the Flood was 5000 B.C. and the average gen. was 40 yrs, 8 humans would be 300M by Christ's time w/ an ave. of just 2.3 children. w/ an average ann. pop. increase of only 0.35 %, but the present world pop. growth is almost 2%. Had humans around for a million yrs with an annual growth rate of only 0.01 %, in a million yrs the pop. would be 10^43+ people and fill 3500 SS's solidly with bodies out to the orbit of Pluto.
If mutation is the mechanism for evolutionary change, life would be based upon mutation, and it would embrace it and integrate systems designed to utilize mutations for evolutionary development. Why then does all life demonstrate the opposite by having a system designed to remove mutations which cause morphological change? Why would DNA Recombination provide this function if evolution required mutation and if mutations were morphologically advantageous?
How creative and fanciful you portray this 'soul'. Forgive me, but much of what you write about this so-called soul sounds like a bunch of hog wash. There is no evidence that a soul even exists; that would need to be shown BEFORE assuming that a potential soul is "alive", is "curious", is the "creator of your physical reality", or is any other 'power' or 'trait'. There's probably no soul, no god, no Santa Claus, nor any other supernatural force or entity. Sometimes our minds just trick us!
You say "NONSENSE" Based on what? The average man has been indoctrinated into the 'official' belief system keeping him in line.We are fed "facts" by parents ,government,media ,religion resulting in a matrix like 'world view' that then becomes our accepted reality. There have always been enlightened individuals that have pierced the veil of manufactured beliefs to discover the greater realities.I understand the fear of learning that some of your most fundamental beliefs are wrong (continued)
To now find that work is required on your part to become a complete man or otherwise fail to 'grow' to the next level of greater dimensional reality is what is causing your fear.
To be honest, I have challenged just about every belief system which i have inherited. I am currently a student studying philosophy interested in what you may call "underlying realities," (metaphysics). Read some Kant, understand that we most likely don't have any cognitive access to or any reason to believe in these spiritual or mystical realms, dimensions or soul and certainly no empirical evidence to concur. I have an open mind. All i ask for is evidence.
Evolution is by far the best explanation of how life changed from microscopic organisms over time into all life that we see today. What may seem like problems with evolution may just in fact be the cold indifference resulting from 'survival of the fittest'. The existence of a god is not a part of the Theory of Evolution. I do not speculate as to 'who' 'seeded' the initial dust cloud at the time of the big bang because I do not speculate about the possible existence of a god.
You do not speculate on who seeded the universe...However there are those who ask not merely how? but why?..it is to those,truly wise souls,that I speak.
The soul is your prime identity,your"original face";existing 'beyond'space-time. It is,itself,alive,curious and the creator of your physical reality.Your soul is composed of 'selves' all creative versions of you existing simultaneously in many 'times' at once. It projects a portion of itself into many dimensions of existance. The projection into our immeadiate physical system 'spins' out a 'physical' body consciousness also forming a conscious mind with it's ego that you recognize as yourself.
How creative and fanciful you portray this 'soul'. Forgive me, but much of what you write about this so-called soul sounds like a bunch of hog wash. There is no evidence that a soul even exists; that would need to be shown BEFORE assuming that a potential soul is "alive", is "curious", is the "creator of your physical reality", or is any other 'power' or 'trait'. There's probably no soul, no god, no Santa Claus, nor any other supernatural force or entity. Sometimes our minds just trick us!
Your mind tricks you by producing a 'description' of reality that is 'word built' The average man mistakes the production that he perceives as the entire reality. If quantum physics establishes that what we call matter is actually interrelating fields,that electrons behave as waves and disappear and reappear between shell levels of the atom without transitional movements-If Relativity establishes that time is 'plastic'and it' effects depend opon the movements of the observer-(continued below)
The very act of observation effectuates the behavior of 'particles' and therfore all events,who do you think is doing the observing-certainly not the physical brain which itself is composed of the physical particles that you so readily accept as real. The physical brain is part of the particle interaction process, is therefore governed by a wave function and cannot collapse itself! Read George Berkeley's: 18th century Classic Treatise to learn that you can only prove that soul and God exist!
Well, why it may be possible that evolution is some god's plan, it seems more reasonable to believe that there is no god and that evolution is simple the best explanation of life. The theory of Evolution stands only, without the need for a creator. We most probably came about through slow incremental changes over long periods of time without the "help" of some god or supernatural force. A god probably does not exist. Have you told a child who asks you, that you believe there is no god lately!
Given all those statements, Logic states that there must be a reason for this organized effort to uphold this deception as truth?
There must be a conscious effort spawned by a group(s) who work tirelessly to keep human beings in a bubble of control during their incarnations for a specific purpose while suppressing truths. Although "they" can't stop or control all things they can create disinformation and build huge walls to prevent the mass of attaining full awareness. Like one GIANT ego.
Curious. You didnt take my remarks to be conspiratorial in nature. So the majority of Humans are held within the Matrix only to allow a few individual Diamonds to pop out from the millions of tons of coal on their own accord 'if' they can break the great barriers set before them. Who and why are 'they' keeping the majority within that bubble or eggshell consciousness.
It's not a conspiracy;rather it is the nature of the 'Ray of Creation' itself.Quantum physics shows that all occurrences are "statistically revealed potentialities"- the events conform to a statistical pattern,but when the event is observed it 'breaks free' of the pattern and behaves randomly! Mankind is subject to the 'law of accident'and follows the sweep of the larger event, when (the few) individuals 'wake up' they then can free themselves, from the effects of 'outside' determinates.
Interesting. Ok Human existence is on a road that has potentialities from complete destruction all the way to absolute transformation and awareness. So I could hypothesize that if enough people wake up there will be a massive shift in the collective consciousness therefore re-defining the nature of the tons of coal subject to the laws of accident? However, once enlightened the laws of accident dont apply. There will no longer be an eggshell collective consciousness eliminating that theory.
At the 'next' level mankind would no longer be oriented in terms of one sex or one race but ,rather, would 'show' all such 'orientations' with each such feature 'swiming up' to the surface depending upon the mood and feelings of the individual also the 'veil' will be lifted and all 'past' incarnations will be seen -we will almost be as multi-persons beyond the level of our singular incarnational focus!
This is getting pretty deep but in theory it is the possible course of human evolution once the primitive collective consciousness has been breached.
Have you read any of Robert Monroe's Books?
In his 2nd book while OBE he is taken to the year 3,000? where the inhabitants of earth rarely use their physical bodies and stay in a non physical form for the most part. Its all energy and balance. I have to reread that chapter again to make sure that is what the description was.
Like a book, the 'story' is created -at once-in the consciousness of it's creator and then appears upon the physical pages of the book for us to read,with the story un-folding over time...with chapter 2 appearing after chapter 1, and the script of chapter 2 building upon chapter 1 yet chapter 2 did not evolve from chapter 1 nor did one cause the other. Our physical reality exists first beyond the light-cone of space-time existing at once, alive and new,coalescing into physical form over "time"
man you gonna love it, its a great intelligent man
his book called the biology of belief, totally against darwin and conventional scielce
and aproaching more and more for the noetic sciences
by the way i really loved the way you conduct your speech in this video, found very funny your sarcasm towards the stupid science is great, wish that the world had more people that think like you.
Quantum physics suggests that the building blocks of all matter do not 'finalize' into a particle or wave until the instant of observation calling into serious question whether the physical world as actual objects exists independently of us,i.e. they take on physical form as a result of our perceiving them -the way a T.V. set transforms a signal into a finished picture.
Einstein's relativity,verified scientifically,proves that time is not absolute but,in fact,relative to the motion of the observer and that space,itself,is curved.Quantum physics reveals that time and space do not truly exist the way we conceive.A pair of ejected electrons continue to correlate their respective spins even at space-time distances,causing many physicists to conclude that the appearance of things separated in space is an illusion.
To my viewers: Evolution is readily apparant-in three dimensional reality,unfolding in our physical system the way a story plays out in a book.That book perhaps is a story about the life of an individual or perhaps the history of an entire civilization spanning a thousand years-yet you can hold the book with it's entire story at once and in the moment.The book did not write itself.Perhaps the book was written in months,perhaps the story conceived in one day. (cotinued below)
I think the 'time' is right to explore why "natural selection" is a failed theory,the answer is not creationism,nor,necessarily "intelligent design" although that comes closest ,so far to the truth--Should have something up-loaded in the next 4-5 weeks!
I am a mathematician, I believe in the Big Bang but that doesn't disprove God, nor the evolution myth.
I believe that God did the Big Bang, and then created the living beings.
Regarding the time, many scientists confessed that if the big bang was slower or faster few seconds, every individual physical law will be changed and we will have different laws, times, matter, energy ...etc, may be there will not be life as well.
that PROVES that there was someone controling the Big Bang, "God".
In classical philosophy one of the proofs of the existance of God is the concept of a "Prime mover" or "First Cause" Before the "Big Bang" and before matter,energy ,time or space Consciousness existed and is the source of everything that 'now' exists
I like ur vid, but I think kids need to learn a lot more about Darwin like:
how he is the one who gave Hitler scientific excuse to murder other races, and other cruel murderers, how ridiculous his lies were, how he supported his lie by valueless drawings, how he gave the right for evolutionists to walk in biological labs as if they belong there.
thanks God I been taught in my high school how ridiculous Darwin's theory was scientificly, scientists aren't storytellers as Darwin was.
Those that 'follow' Darwin march to the old paradigm ,sadly still believing that space and time ,cause and effect apply to the eternal present of the true Self.What isn't taught is :Darwin believed that God created evolution as part of his WAY ,in that ,he was not incorrect!
Christianity as you know it today was the result of survivial of the fitest .Non trinitarians and Gnostics murdered and tortured .Break away sects also hunted down and killed .Scientist killed burned put under house arest for adavancing science .Dont call the kettle black.Religion has very bloody hands .You obviously have an axe to grind if you dont have a Fundy view on life !
You are certainly right,however science has now become somewhat arrogant and pedantic-starting to sound like a religion with it's smug certainty-science IS authoritative on the structure and makeup of physical reality,but,when it comes to consciousness and the Eternal validity of the soul it(science) doesn't know and it doesn't know that it doesn't know-but here is a hint for the Aristotilians and for the science that follows: The highest principal of the universe is not the truth but the Good!
I understand your science quite well indeed, actually ...I understand,as well, the philosophical under-pinnings that gave birth to science....I suggest you get yourself some help if you truly aim to debate me on science
-accident? no science never says that. you said accident 6 times in the video
-exploded? no, its called inflation.
- we are apes. some biologists think that humans and chimpanzees should be in the same genus: pan or homo.
-offspring of murderers and killers that went on the crusades killin people cuz they didnt believe in god, witch hunters,kkk,flying planes into buildings etc..all in the name of religion?
We are not apes...you confuse physical manifestation with the un-manifest reality...Man did not evolve from apes nor from any thing else "god" created apes and man and everything else at the same "time": of course time does not exist --at least not the way you think you understand it
I agree ,you often see fanaticism with all religions...the desire to condemn those who are different or individual--Many point to Islam with an accusing finger,yet wasn't it christians who burned witches at the stake! Simply because religious fanaticism permeates all religions does not mean that belief in God is to blame....I take a different view-neither evolution or creationism....the world is neither 6,000 years old nor is it billions! It is both eternal and ever new!
huh... interesting. wait, why are the majority of inmates in america religious? athiests live life as if this was their only one. we cherish it and live it happily. theists believe that this is only the antecedent of their eternal life...
yes that is great... um, i never said anything about murderers. i said inmates. once again you make assumptions on things that you really have no business doing unless you look at it indepth. read my response again. i wrote it slowly so even creationists can understand. hahaha
The VAST majority of criminals are atheists, and even if you see some murderers have religion that doesn't mean that religion promotes killing.
BUT when it comes to atheism, KILLING is a DUTY and recommended by Darwin since it is the mechanism of Evolution and everyone MUST kill everyone in order to survive.
The conecption of Evolution is: everyone is everyone's enemy.
in the contrary: REligion always promotes peace and love for all people.
A deteministic world with no future would resemble what we see with some people today; greed ,do whatever you need to in order to 'get yours'no matter who you have to 'step on' to get ahead,attractive girls and boys selling themselves or their principles for fame or money,etc. yes there would be those who intuitively 'felt' their higher self and would not 'stoop'
one of the things I do like about your movies althought not related to what your eaching, is that you take the time to go back and awnser peoples responces as best you can
Please don't uncritically accept everything science preaches Those that profess that "There is no God" and ""there is no soul" are as dogmatic as any other fundamentalist. In matters spiritual, science doesn't know,and doesn't know that it doesn't know!
So you believe that life arose by accident as a result of an admixture of mindless chemical reactions ,randomly combining in accordance with laws that no one created,all initiated in a primordal 'big bang'.That philosophy and art,music and love imagination and courage was all enfolded in that original cloud of dust, which one day,decided ,on it's own,to condense into a singularity that then exploaded into the world that we know...Now who is the one that believes in fairy tales!
we have explanations for these things if you tookk the time to read them. um... and i suppose the god that made all of this must be extremely complex to be able to create, the universe, read thoughts of every individual person etc. etc. so was this being just popped into existence? God raises more questions than answers pal. especially with no evidence.
Everything your saying is counter intuitive to what quantum mechanics says. I have been furiously researching this subject and I can honestly say that I have encountered not one shred of evidence that substantiates what your saying.
If you can direct me to a specific text, other than what you have stated, or a portion if a text (the chapter, the line)
How about David Bohm,professor of Theoretical physics at Birbeck College in London, his book: Wholeness and the Implicate Order (London;Rutledge & Kegan Ltd,1981) Also the work of physicist Jack Sarfatti.
The problem I am having is that your arguments smack of 'zero point energy', It just doesn't make sense. You could argue that you can break the laws of thermodynamics, but without accurate theoretical reasoning, no one is going to believe you!.
he's correct about Freund, he was a douche. but it doesn't mean that if a theory(that is proven a dozen times) sounds difficult for you to accept because of ur world view you should reject it. all in all this guy is a retard and i'm smart
Perhaps you are smart ,but are you wise...Do you measure your intelligence by how well you have accepted what you have been taught?! Do you ,rather, break free of indoctrination and explore the realm where those with wisdom have ventured?
I personally measure my intelligence by what I can create and my problem solving ability.
I think your out put is a much better indicator of your intelligence than anything else. Even if you were to argue that that is cunning, not intelligence, I would argue it is both and say your ability to make not just sense of the facts, but to do something useful with them is better than just assimilating the facts perfectly in any case!.
Reality(physical)does not exist continuously, rather, Our physical reality 'blinks' off and on, one 'moment'here and the next not here--Our perception,of course , unable to perceive the gaps ( of 'non-existence')The entire 'physical 'universe blinks off and on in an eternal NOW; i.e. reality is dis-continuous. Planck's constant reveals much!
It is only discontinuous if you think in three dimensional vectors AND if you think from the point of view of your self when looking at the electron!. I;m sure if the electron was as an entity it would understand exactly why these things appear the way they are because they would have evolved in that environment.
The only reason such concepts are alien to us is because we are from middle world! not the quantum world!.
The only think your argument has going for it is that our brains are a wonderful organ and work in an analogue way, this is where the link breaks down and fantasy begins, but hey, lets finish the book (Physics and Philosophy:The Revolution in Modern Science) before I go jumping to the same conclusion as the rest of the scientific community...
I truly feel that you need to also read physicist , David Bohm's book : "Wholeness and The Implicate Order" ! How can you account for the fact that electrons continue to correlate their respective spins at space-time distances or that photons correlate their polarity while moving apart at the speed of light?!
I can't but to be fair, I'm not a physicists and never said I was, whats that got to do with healing your body with your mind, the world of the quantum has NOTHING to do with the world of the atomic and upwards with respect to universal laws.
You are also suggesting that our mind is in some way able to manipulate the world of the quantum, this in both suggestion and practice is where your argument falls on it's ass to be honest!.
May I also point out that the uncertainty principal was founded on the idea that photons would displace the behaviour of subparticles making impossible to know there speed and location.
That is not to say that measuring devices that do not exist yet using mass less particles predicted in string theory could not measure both without disturbing any sub particles.
Purely a theoretical point of view, making such a device is a complete other matter indeed!
Quantum physics reveals what the ancients already knew; -man is the measure of all things- We are connected to 'All That Is' at some fundamental level...both beneath and beyond both quantum physics and realitivity
But the world of the quantum is separate and divided from the middle world we are familiar with, how can there be any correlation, they appear to operate by different rules?
Sure there is! Read physicists David Bohm ,Werner Heisenberg ,Jack Sarfatti or physicists Everett,Wheeler and Graham.Read the findings of Clinton Davisson at Bell Telephone Laboratories verifying the doctoral thesis of Physicist Louis de Broglies. Are you not familiar with the Clausen-Freedman experiments?
In fairness to your suggestion I have indeed visited the library and because I am good friends with the librarian I have managed to procure a copy from the reference part, there are two copies strangely enough, as there are two copies of the principia!.
My advice, take a sabbatical and research what your saying thoroughly, you will find that your ideas are that born of someone who misinterprets the concepts in front of them!.
An anecdote to explain what you remind me of!
child asks :- 'if the black box of a plane is indestructible, why not make the whole pane out of that material!'
I'm actually an engineer and a designer by trade so to say that I am useless and cannot apply my knowledge is pretty dumb, I have designed PA systems that are on the cutting edge of design.
Pocket arrays and the like!. I also study physics to a really obsessional degree, I can honestly say that my knowledge of psychology is pretty limited but I know enough to say that what your suggesting just simply isn't true not by any standard and no pear would endorse your view!.
I never said that about you.Your comments also reveal a deep and persistent intellect of some consideral depth.You are certainly extraordinarily well read
LOL ive been following your vids and up to this point you seemed very intelligent and I completely followed along and understood but denying evolution (which is happening right in front of our eyes), and literally shoving words (that no sane scientist has every spoken) down the throat of science, is beyond a crime to your own mind. wow. Why do philosophical whackjobs think in terms of spirit OR science ... no it's both, at the same time. don't destroy your arguement by denying fact.
ForToday03 7 months ago
@ForToday03 Evolution is evident on the 'physical' level,however,the emergence of biological forms into our physical experience occurs over time,reality is created at a pre-physical level beyond time existing 'at once' like a story for our perspective.An author may write a story that covers years, each chapter building on the previous one; the writer may have conceived the story in minutes,perhaps he wrote the ending before the beginning,the second chapter didn't evolve from the prvious one.
JamesJTraitz 7 months ago
@JamesJTraitz so you're saying everything has already played out, and we're just watching
ForToday03 7 months ago
@ForToday03 No..Nothing is pre-determined; by our choices,we co-create our own reality;but, all possible manifestations of creaturehood already exist in a larger dimensional framework of reality
JamesJTraitz 7 months ago
Darwinism is the biggest joke and the most dangerous lie of all times, just next second to the trinity.Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Moselini,Mao Zitung, WWI and II, Colonialism, rasism, nationalism,Apartheid are some of fruits of Darwinims.Hitler and Stalin wrote that Darwinism was their prime force in their ideology and actions.
Arianiuss 1 year ago
James: People are so brainwashed since the first day of scholl that they can not think of alternative explanations.They are literaly lost.
Arianiuss 1 year ago
@Arianiuss Yes; many have lost their child like ability to behold and recognize Infinity , the Spirit
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
Exellent facts, it is exactly what happening. People wondering why people are like this and like that, why there is war and conflicts.Why children are as they are today.Youth became so arrogant and without empathy or compasion. It is a up side down world. There came some year ago extra ordinary Super evidence against Darwinism fraud , called The Atlas oF ceation.These books shocked entire European univerities, they had to ban these books, coz its powerful impact.
Arianiuss 1 year ago
For someone who bases their beliefs so strongly on the realism of quantum physics, you certainly are cynical concerning evolution and cosmology
Also, we are the ancestors of murderers. Our history is scarred with war and strife, AND our culture happily perpetuates the exploitation of other species.
TheShukuga 1 year ago
@TheShukuga Darwin's "Naturasl Selection" is simply wrong...as was Freud
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
@JamesJTraitz Sure, neo-freudians are few and far in between, but the mechanism of natural selection is rock solid. Do you deny selection's explanatory capabilities, its empirical validity, its rationality, or its implication (or whatever you object to)?
TheShukuga 1 year ago
@TheShukuga the 'motive force' of "evolution" is not natural selection but consciousness' own ,inherant drive towards excellence ,quality or 'value fulfillment
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
ok all you self righteous athiests,out there. can't you see. your just as dogmatic as the religious zelots you critisize.just admit you don't know.I've had inexplicable events occur in my life that happened without your or my consent.just like the earth continues to revolve around the sun with or without us capitulating to its existence.
vgraham44 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy You seek physical evidence for non-physical reality...re: time..think of a movie reel it is projected serially yet exists at once
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy Fine- define gravity ...what actually is it and what produces it? You forget that beyond three-dimensional reality is a larger dimension of actuality from which the physical /camouflage forms emerge...they all exist at once in a 'pre-physical' state of being and then manifest through a series of events that we interpret as "time" which,incidently does not exist
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
@rationalanarchy I disagree
JamesJTraitz 1 year ago
Very interesting and important comment.
kamur 2 years ago
Funny , the extent people will go to find mediocre contentment in believing that there is no spiritual dimension..they prefer to live like apes
JamesJTraitz 2 years ago
Not a creationist...evolutionists are naive
JamesJTraitz 2 years ago
wow this man talks like a 7 yr old........is that all u know about evolution???
pff another creationist propoganda vid!!!
sunlitekid01 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I DREAM OF THE DAY WHEN SCIENTISTS WILL BE ALLOWED TO TEST ACIDS, CHEMICALS AND DRUGS ON CREATIONISTS, INSTEAD OF ANIMALS, I DREAM OF THE DAY WHEN WE GROW CREATIONISTS IN FARMS AS SLAVES, SO WE DO NOT HAVE TO WORK, I DREAM OF THE DAY WE BEAT UP CREATIONISTS FREELY WHENEVER WE ARE STRESSED, I DREAM OF THE DAY WE CAN TIE CREATIONISTS ON OUR CAR BUMPERS 4 FUN, I DREAM OF THE DAY CREATIONISTS ASSUME THEIR PROPER ROLE IN LIFE, AS MINDLESS SLAVES. dont blame me i watched their unintelligent videos
graphattic 2 years ago
I DREAM OF THE DAY WHEN SCIENTISTS WILL BE ALLOWED TO TEST ACIDS, CHEMICALS AND DRUGS ON CREATIONISTS, INSTEAD OF ANIMALS, I DREAM OF THE DAY WHEN WE GROW CREATIONISTS IN FARMS AS SLAVES, SO WE DO NOT HAVE TO WORK, I DREAM OF THE DAY WE BEAT UP CREATIONISTS FREELY WHENEVER WE ARE STRESSED, I DREAM OF THE DAY WE CAN TIE CREATIONISTS ON OUR CAR BUMPERS 4 FUN, I DREAM OF THE DAY CREATIONISTS ASSUME THEIR PROPER ROLE IN LIFE, AS MINDLESS SLAVES. dont blame me i watched their unintelligent videos
graphattic 2 years ago
This idiot looks like a mature adult but his grasp of natural science, esp evolution, is so childish and full of outright lies that I'm amazed and dumbfound.
prschuster 2 years ago
where can i study more about quantum physics?
guidav123 2 years ago
Many good non-mathematical books...Tha Tao of physics , The Dancing Wu Li Masters , Wholeness and the Implicate Order
JamesJTraitz 2 years ago
thank you i will research these books and thin i may give your book a try!
guidav123 2 years ago
WOW, I don't need to write the lesson plans for tomorrow now. Thanks!
If any "living" force or energy exists, I hope it's gravity.
mrdscience 2 years ago
I am fairly certain (right around 100% certain) that survival of the fittest does not translate to "killed off weaker biological forms." Just because a creature does not exist does not mean that it was killed off. SURVIVAL of the fittest means that certain organisms SURVIVED conditions better then others. Nowhere does that directly imply that they killed everything that does not exist. If killing others would be the only way to evolve how would there exist more herbivores than carnivores?
AgainImFalling 3 years ago
This is so unjustified in nearly all ways. If you are going to make such statements (which are potentially very interesting), it is essential to provide some sort of explanation, not just a set of 'facts'.
Myr4d 3 years ago
Think of it this way: Nothing in Darwin's theory rules out God or the soul nor does it rule out that God created the entire evolutionary process,a priori, or at once (outside of time) and 'allows' it to unfold 'in time' the way a movie unfolds on the screen
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
Thank you (and sorry for the delay)
I could not agree more with the above and i think you will find it hard to find an eminent atheist who would maintain that it does. Even Dawkins, who is admired as a leading neo-darwinist, does not claim to be able to disprove God with 100% certainity (see his debate with Alister McGrath) and if you are right (i am in the UK) about your teaching system that is very worrying.
Myr4d 2 years ago
(cont) However, i would caution you not to be too hasty about simply introducing metaphysical notions or even 'hypothetical physics' into the class room. There needs to be some criteria for what we should teach in schools and i think that is the core question. As i am sure you are aware, the FSM is a fantastic warning against simply reverting from 'traditional science' and cornforming to more 'contraversial' science on the basis of its popularity.
Myr4d 2 years ago
So my response is, if indeed you are right about the state of school curriculum and you are appreciative enough to see that your 'factual' existential claims at the begining of this video are far from widely accepted, what criteria are you arguing should be used to make up a 'non-limited' view?
Myr4d 2 years ago
That evolution theory adequatly explains our physical experience ; however quantum mechanics and realitivity alerts us that time is bounded and of limited relevence , so we must look 'elsewhere' for the true explainations of man's existence. That quantum physics,ancient zen buddhism and reaitivity theory all point to a reality that is subjective and influenced by the mind of Man!
JamesJTraitz 2 years ago
Are you seriously positing that we try and teach young children postmodernism&modern physics? i find these notions challenging (and without wanting to be egotistical) i have a place at Oxford University to study maths&philosophy. With all due respect, i hope you realise that you notions of a subjective reality etc are far from factual. So i am saying we cannot (at the moment) establish a 'truth' that will satisfies all top academics so what criteria should we use for selecting teaching material?
Myr4d 2 years ago
Agreed. We should begin with a variation of what we teach now and introduce to the young and developing minds the implications of what realitivity and quantum theory suggest
JamesJTraitz 2 years ago
you prefer life without meaning?!
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
JESUS
cuzit06 3 years ago
He's right! Society is learning us to kill or be killed, that's why the world is so violent.
chavdar84 3 years ago
As long as we are taught that we live in a 'survival of the fittest' world where there is no greater power or soul the mentality of "kill or be killed" will hold sway! Biologically ,big fish eat the smaller fish,we have predators and prey-yet there is a vast spiritual dimension of actuality which is our birthright.You can not expand into a 'larger' dimension of being (where your thoughts instantly manifest)until you begin to take responsibility for the thoughts that you direct towards others!
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
WROng, WRONG WRONG WRONG WONRG!
SpicyHam 3 years ago
Do you have some intelligent basis for your "wrong" tantrum
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
ahh nvm :O
SpicyHam 3 years ago
You are a grade A moron. If school education is so bad, where did you get so smart? The mafia? Are they into education now?
Like Don said, you are not doing science justice. But what's worse, you aren't doing reality any favors either.
I do not claim to know the truth, but I know bullsh|t when I see it.
If you're serious about knowing the meaning to life read philosophy. If you want to know science, read science. Don't listen to this worthless hack.
Sectorsophia 3 years ago
So angry,so freightened.School ed. is fine-as far as it goes-a great place to start,but I wouldn't whant to live there- I have seen attacks like yours before...fearfull to have the little bit of knowledge you have be challenged.Tell you what,why don't you stop tuning in here and stick to yesterdays knowledge,beliefs and teachings---just think ,no more knew ideas to scare you!
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
Alltrough I like most of your ideas and a know that Ed is not perfect. Yet I missed a practical point in here... Could you point it out for me?
Thnx, keep the good work.
rulis124 3 years ago
You COMPLETELY misunderstand evolution. And Sigmund Freud, as insightful as he was, is not technically "science", as anyone in the field of psychology that he fathered will easily tell you.
If you can make such GROSS mistakes with such simple concepts i do not even wanna get into what you do to quantum physics.
Your methods are ridiculous, your conjectures loosely based on poor understanding of common scientific principles are laughable.
DonVoghano 3 years ago
I think it is you that does not understand.You confuse evolution with natural selection.Evolution 'plays out' in our experience but is not based on nor caused by physical forms changing. It all exists pre-physically at once and emerges into our experience through a medium that we interpret as passage of time. I agree with you re: Sigmund Freud.
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
I think James explained rather well "What and How" teachers are implanting in our minds. When we get out of the institution, that is the core foundation of our belief; No god, it's your ego/id, no after life, it's only you peanial gland...
I think you (don) are likely one of those no longer able to share/acquire knowledge in simple terms. I would not want to talk about quantum physics or how the brain is actualy able to flip qbit with you either.
iamufreak 3 years ago 2
To christians: You realize that your religion is the result of stolen concepts and rituals from pagan religions, correct? That is established fact. Therefore, any new 'information' appended is invalid when the whole composition is considered. Individually, there may be pieces of wisdom articulated at different depths, but claims to the throne of the universe and ethics out of the bible are invalid. A 'god' shouldn't have to rely on plagiarism.
Vebroveromas 3 years ago
"To christians: You realize that your religion is the result of stolen concepts and rituals from pagan religions, correct? That is established fact."
why attack religion when it's ridiculous?
so evolution can be interrelated but a religion steals concepts??
study proto-indo-europeans and how languages and cultures work
for example, through cultural experience i gather YHWY and IOVIS to be cognates because religion is a legacy of shared observations
aeiva 3 years ago
Genesis 22:17
"Blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your descendants as the stars of the heaven and as the sand which is on the seashore; and your descendants shall possess the gate of their enemies."
Jeremiah 33:22
"As the host of heaven cannot be numbered, nor the sand of the sea measured, so will I multiply the descendants of David My servant and the Levites who minister to Me."
NephilimFree 3 years ago
Even today, scientists admit that they do not know how many stars there are. Only about 3,000 can be seen with the naked eye. We have seen estimates of 10^21 stars - which is a lot of stars. The number of grains of sand on the earth's seashores is estimated to be 10^25. As scientists discover more stars, wouldn't it be interesting to discover that these two numbers match?
NephilimFree 3 years ago
The Bible describes the circulation of the atmosphere around the globe. It was not known the Earth had global atmospheric patterns until the 18th century.
Ecclesiastes 1:6
The wind goes toward the south,
And turns around to the north;
The wind whirls about continually,
And comes again on its circuit.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
That's twice I posted that. Do you need me to post it for you a few more times? Do you read 2 words of each post?
NephilimFree 3 years ago
The existance of cells was not known until Antony van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) invented the compound microscope.
It was not known how long sperm cells live outside the body until even later.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
[18] The woman also with whom man shall lie with seed of copulation, they shall both bathe themselves in water, and be unclean until the even.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
Sperm cells live 1 to several hrs. outside the body, and cells weren't discovered until the 17th century. Because the Bible was inspired directly by God and is His creation, the Bible knew this 2,000 yrs ago:
[16] And if any man's seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the even.
[17] And every garment, and every skin, whereon is the seed of copulation, shall be washed with water, and be unclean until the even.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
"That's fine but your claim that the solar system should be filled with human life 3500 times is completely wrong and that is based on mathematics. It is impossible for the human population to reach that amount."
It was a mathematical observation that mankind is nowhere near as old as evolutionists claim.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
[18] The woman also with whom man shall lie with seed of copulation, they shall both bathe themselves in water, and be unclean until the even.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
Sperm cells live 1 to several hrs. outside the body, and cells weren't discovered until the 17th century. Because the Bible was inspired directly by God and is His creation, the Bible knew this 2,000 yrs ago:
[16] And if any man's seed of copulation go out from him, then he shall wash all his flesh in water, and be unclean until the even.
[17] And every garment, and every skin, whereon is the seed of copulation, shall be washed with water, and be unclean until the even.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
The Bible describes the circulation of the atmosphere. It was not known the Earth had global atmospheric patterns until the 18th century.
Ecclesiastes 1:6
The wind goes toward the south,
And turns around to the north;
The wind whirls about continually,
And comes again on its circuit.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
It was a mathematical observation that mankind is nowhere near as old as evolutionists claim. Math proves the population would exceed it's current size outrageously. It was not a proposal that people should could survive. Carrying capacity is not a factor. The number of children per couple throught the ages is known from literary history. Had this rate begun when evolutionists claim man evolved (200,000 yrs ago - 1M yrs ago) the earth would have become insanely overpopulated long, long ago.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
Ask a logical question.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
But friend, the universe is winding down. Entropy is occuring. It is dying a heat death and dissintegration. Complexity and order do not arise naturally. Sorry.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
"Science is quite good at studing the 'outsideness' of God's creation!"
Outsideness? You mean, stupefying complexity isd not an indication of design? We know that nature does not create order, organization, or complexity. And the cosmos aren't alive either. Matter has no brain, no cognitive capacity or process.
Your occultism is quite obvious Sir.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
Look! We agree more than we disagree. Matter's complexity does prove God's design
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
He is wrong about science telling us that this is a deterministic universe, quantum mechanics tells us the exact opposite.
soyismurder 3 years ago
"Science is quite good at studing the 'outsideness' of God's creation!"
It also verifies the Bible in numerous ways. Most of the major events of the Bible have been verified with science: the crossing of the Red Sea, Sodom and Gommorah, Tower of Babel, confusion of languages (72 to be exact), the burned mountain Sinai, existance of King David, nephilim, etc.
I know you don't study these matters, but you need. I asked you a question. Are you a memeber of the Illuminati or Freemasons?
NephilimFree 3 years ago
I am not a member or adherent of either group.I am not a joiner of groups.
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
Retina cells are astonishingly complex. To simulate 10 seconds of the complete processing of a single cell of the retina of the human eye would require solution of 500 simultaneous nonlinear differential equasions 100 times, and would take several minutes of processing time on a Cray Supercomputer. How do random genetic mutations design such an apparatus?
People like this gentleman proclaim truths, in the name of science, while remaining completely ignorant of what science demonstrates.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
Science is quite good at studing the 'outsideness' of God's creation!
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
Estimates of the TL human pop. at the time of Christ are about 300M. If the Flood was 5000 B.C. and the average gen. was 40 yrs, 8 humans would be 300M by Christ's time w/ an ave. of just 2.3 children. w/ an average ann. pop. increase of only 0.35 %, but the present world pop. growth is almost 2%. Had humans around for a million yrs with an annual growth rate of only 0.01 %, in a million yrs the pop. would be 10^43+ people and fill 3500 SS's solidly with bodies out to the orbit of Pluto.
NephilimFree 3 years ago
If mutation is the mechanism for evolutionary change, life would be based upon mutation, and it would embrace it and integrate systems designed to utilize mutations for evolutionary development. Why then does all life demonstrate the opposite by having a system designed to remove mutations which cause morphological change? Why would DNA Recombination provide this function if evolution required mutation and if mutations were morphologically advantageous?
NephilimFree 3 years ago
How creative and fanciful you portray this 'soul'. Forgive me, but much of what you write about this so-called soul sounds like a bunch of hog wash. There is no evidence that a soul even exists; that would need to be shown BEFORE assuming that a potential soul is "alive", is "curious", is the "creator of your physical reality", or is any other 'power' or 'trait'. There's probably no soul, no god, no Santa Claus, nor any other supernatural force or entity. Sometimes our minds just trick us!
JohnHasSeriousQ 3 years ago
NONSENSE
edmiller3786 3 years ago
You say "NONSENSE" Based on what? The average man has been indoctrinated into the 'official' belief system keeping him in line.We are fed "facts" by parents ,government,media ,religion resulting in a matrix like 'world view' that then becomes our accepted reality. There have always been enlightened individuals that have pierced the veil of manufactured beliefs to discover the greater realities.I understand the fear of learning that some of your most fundamental beliefs are wrong (continued)
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
To now find that work is required on your part to become a complete man or otherwise fail to 'grow' to the next level of greater dimensional reality is what is causing your fear.
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
To be honest, I have challenged just about every belief system which i have inherited. I am currently a student studying philosophy interested in what you may call "underlying realities," (metaphysics). Read some Kant, understand that we most likely don't have any cognitive access to or any reason to believe in these spiritual or mystical realms, dimensions or soul and certainly no empirical evidence to concur. I have an open mind. All i ask for is evidence.
edmiller3786 3 years ago
As Gurdjieff said: accept nothing on faith verify for yourself.
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
Evolution is by far the best explanation of how life changed from microscopic organisms over time into all life that we see today. What may seem like problems with evolution may just in fact be the cold indifference resulting from 'survival of the fittest'. The existence of a god is not a part of the Theory of Evolution. I do not speculate as to 'who' 'seeded' the initial dust cloud at the time of the big bang because I do not speculate about the possible existence of a god.
JohnHasSeriousQ 3 years ago
You do not speculate on who seeded the universe...However there are those who ask not merely how? but why?..it is to those,truly wise souls,that I speak.
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
what's a soul?
JohnHasSeriousQ 3 years ago
The soul is your prime identity,your"original face";existing 'beyond'space-time. It is,itself,alive,curious and the creator of your physical reality.Your soul is composed of 'selves' all creative versions of you existing simultaneously in many 'times' at once. It projects a portion of itself into many dimensions of existance. The projection into our immeadiate physical system 'spins' out a 'physical' body consciousness also forming a conscious mind with it's ego that you recognize as yourself.
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
How creative and fanciful you portray this 'soul'. Forgive me, but much of what you write about this so-called soul sounds like a bunch of hog wash. There is no evidence that a soul even exists; that would need to be shown BEFORE assuming that a potential soul is "alive", is "curious", is the "creator of your physical reality", or is any other 'power' or 'trait'. There's probably no soul, no god, no Santa Claus, nor any other supernatural force or entity. Sometimes our minds just trick us!
JohnHasSeriousQ 3 years ago
Your mind tricks you by producing a 'description' of reality that is 'word built' The average man mistakes the production that he perceives as the entire reality. If quantum physics establishes that what we call matter is actually interrelating fields,that electrons behave as waves and disappear and reappear between shell levels of the atom without transitional movements-If Relativity establishes that time is 'plastic'and it' effects depend opon the movements of the observer-(continued below)
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
The very act of observation effectuates the behavior of 'particles' and therfore all events,who do you think is doing the observing-certainly not the physical brain which itself is composed of the physical particles that you so readily accept as real. The physical brain is part of the particle interaction process, is therefore governed by a wave function and cannot collapse itself! Read George Berkeley's: 18th century Classic Treatise to learn that you can only prove that soul and God exist!
JamesJTraitz 3 years ago
Well, why it may be possible that evolution is some god's plan, it seems more reasonable to believe that there is no god and that evolution is simple the best explanation of life. The theory of Evolution stands only, without the need for a creator. We most probably came about through slow incremental changes over long periods of time without the "help" of some god or supernatural force. A god probably does not exist. Have you told a child who asks you, that you believe there is no god lately!
JohnHasSeriousQ 3 years ago
Given all those statements, Logic states that there must be a reason for this organized effort to uphold this deception as truth?
There must be a conscious effort spawned by a group(s) who work tirelessly to keep human beings in a bubble of control during their incarnations for a specific purpose while suppressing truths. Although "they" can't stop or control all things they can create disinformation and build huge walls to prevent the mass of attaining full awareness. Like one GIANT ego.
OpenMind00 4 years ago
OpenMindOO is again right about this; the 'world' needs to hold the majority of man within the 'matrix' or else it all comes "tumbling down"
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
Curious. You didnt take my remarks to be conspiratorial in nature. So the majority of Humans are held within the Matrix only to allow a few individual Diamonds to pop out from the millions of tons of coal on their own accord 'if' they can break the great barriers set before them. Who and why are 'they' keeping the majority within that bubble or eggshell consciousness.
OpenMind00 4 years ago
It's not a conspiracy;rather it is the nature of the 'Ray of Creation' itself.Quantum physics shows that all occurrences are "statistically revealed potentialities"- the events conform to a statistical pattern,but when the event is observed it 'breaks free' of the pattern and behaves randomly! Mankind is subject to the 'law of accident'and follows the sweep of the larger event, when (the few) individuals 'wake up' they then can free themselves, from the effects of 'outside' determinates.
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
Interesting. Ok Human existence is on a road that has potentialities from complete destruction all the way to absolute transformation and awareness. So I could hypothesize that if enough people wake up there will be a massive shift in the collective consciousness therefore re-defining the nature of the tons of coal subject to the laws of accident? However, once enlightened the laws of accident dont apply. There will no longer be an eggshell collective consciousness eliminating that theory.
OpenMind00 4 years ago
The "massive" shift would result in mankind's experience expanding to the 'next' level(beyond the singular incarnation level)
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
At the 'next' level mankind would no longer be oriented in terms of one sex or one race but ,rather, would 'show' all such 'orientations' with each such feature 'swiming up' to the surface depending upon the mood and feelings of the individual also the 'veil' will be lifted and all 'past' incarnations will be seen -we will almost be as multi-persons beyond the level of our singular incarnational focus!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
This is getting pretty deep but in theory it is the possible course of human evolution once the primitive collective consciousness has been breached.
Have you read any of Robert Monroe's Books?
In his 2nd book while OBE he is taken to the year 3,000? where the inhabitants of earth rarely use their physical bodies and stay in a non physical form for the most part. Its all energy and balance. I have to reread that chapter again to make sure that is what the description was.
Been a while.
OpenMind00 4 years ago
Have'nt read it but it sounds good!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
nice diatribe and very true
joca63 4 years ago
Can you forward me a link to him. I will check it out and tell you what I think.
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
Like a book, the 'story' is created -at once-in the consciousness of it's creator and then appears upon the physical pages of the book for us to read,with the story un-folding over time...with chapter 2 appearing after chapter 1, and the script of chapter 2 building upon chapter 1 yet chapter 2 did not evolve from chapter 1 nor did one cause the other. Our physical reality exists first beyond the light-cone of space-time existing at once, alive and new,coalescing into physical form over "time"
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
hey james have you ever heard about Celular biologist Dr. Bruce Lipton?
matheusnyc 4 years ago
No I have not,but I am always open to all such ideas
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
man you gonna love it, its a great intelligent man
his book called the biology of belief, totally against darwin and conventional scielce
and aproaching more and more for the noetic sciences
by the way i really loved the way you conduct your speech in this video, found very funny your sarcasm towards the stupid science is great, wish that the world had more people that think like you.
matheusnyc 4 years ago
Quantum physics suggests that the building blocks of all matter do not 'finalize' into a particle or wave until the instant of observation calling into serious question whether the physical world as actual objects exists independently of us,i.e. they take on physical form as a result of our perceiving them -the way a T.V. set transforms a signal into a finished picture.
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
Einstein's relativity,verified scientifically,proves that time is not absolute but,in fact,relative to the motion of the observer and that space,itself,is curved.Quantum physics reveals that time and space do not truly exist the way we conceive.A pair of ejected electrons continue to correlate their respective spins even at space-time distances,causing many physicists to conclude that the appearance of things separated in space is an illusion.
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
To my viewers: Evolution is readily apparant-in three dimensional reality,unfolding in our physical system the way a story plays out in a book.That book perhaps is a story about the life of an individual or perhaps the history of an entire civilization spanning a thousand years-yet you can hold the book with it's entire story at once and in the moment.The book did not write itself.Perhaps the book was written in months,perhaps the story conceived in one day. (cotinued below)
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
Great vid man. I absolutely agree =)
dragonmike777 4 years ago
I think the 'time' is right to explore why "natural selection" is a failed theory,the answer is not creationism,nor,necessarily "intelligent design" although that comes closest ,so far to the truth--Should have something up-loaded in the next 4-5 weeks!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
I am a mathematician, I believe in the Big Bang but that doesn't disprove God, nor the evolution myth.
I believe that God did the Big Bang, and then created the living beings.
Regarding the time, many scientists confessed that if the big bang was slower or faster few seconds, every individual physical law will be changed and we will have different laws, times, matter, energy ...etc, may be there will not be life as well.
that PROVES that there was someone controling the Big Bang, "God".
IslamPlanet 4 years ago
In classical philosophy one of the proofs of the existance of God is the concept of a "Prime mover" or "First Cause" Before the "Big Bang" and before matter,energy ,time or space Consciousness existed and is the source of everything that 'now' exists
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
I like ur vid, but I think kids need to learn a lot more about Darwin like:
how he is the one who gave Hitler scientific excuse to murder other races, and other cruel murderers, how ridiculous his lies were, how he supported his lie by valueless drawings, how he gave the right for evolutionists to walk in biological labs as if they belong there.
thanks God I been taught in my high school how ridiculous Darwin's theory was scientificly, scientists aren't storytellers as Darwin was.
IslamPlanet 4 years ago
Those that 'follow' Darwin march to the old paradigm ,sadly still believing that space and time ,cause and effect apply to the eternal present of the true Self.What isn't taught is :Darwin believed that God created evolution as part of his WAY ,in that ,he was not incorrect!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
I Agree 100%.
great video 5*.
IslamPlanet 4 years ago 2
Christianity as you know it today was the result of survivial of the fitest .Non trinitarians and Gnostics murdered and tortured .Break away sects also hunted down and killed .Scientist killed burned put under house arest for adavancing science .Dont call the kettle black.Religion has very bloody hands .You obviously have an axe to grind if you dont have a Fundy view on life !
flyingscience 4 years ago
You are certainly right,however science has now become somewhat arrogant and pedantic-starting to sound like a religion with it's smug certainty-science IS authoritative on the structure and makeup of physical reality,but,when it comes to consciousness and the Eternal validity of the soul it(science) doesn't know and it doesn't know that it doesn't know-but here is a hint for the Aristotilians and for the science that follows: The highest principal of the universe is not the truth but the Good!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
you clearly have no understanding of science so you clearly have no business telling us what we say and trying to tell people we are full of lies.
jiujitsuman 4 years ago
I understand your science quite well indeed, actually ...I understand,as well, the philosophical under-pinnings that gave birth to science....I suggest you get yourself some help if you truly aim to debate me on science
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
let me just point some things out:
-accident? no science never says that. you said accident 6 times in the video
-exploded? no, its called inflation.
- we are apes. some biologists think that humans and chimpanzees should be in the same genus: pan or homo.
-offspring of murderers and killers that went on the crusades killin people cuz they didnt believe in god, witch hunters,kkk,flying planes into buildings etc..all in the name of religion?
beleive in truth or icing covered fairy tales
jiujitsuman 4 years ago
We are not apes...you confuse physical manifestation with the un-manifest reality...Man did not evolve from apes nor from any thing else "god" created apes and man and everything else at the same "time": of course time does not exist --at least not the way you think you understand it
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
I agree ,you often see fanaticism with all religions...the desire to condemn those who are different or individual--Many point to Islam with an accusing finger,yet wasn't it christians who burned witches at the stake! Simply because religious fanaticism permeates all religions does not mean that belief in God is to blame....I take a different view-neither evolution or creationism....the world is neither 6,000 years old nor is it billions! It is both eternal and ever new!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
huh... interesting. wait, why are the majority of inmates in america religious? athiests live life as if this was their only one. we cherish it and live it happily. theists believe that this is only the antecedent of their eternal life...
jiujitsuman 4 years ago
the majority of murderers are not religious!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
yes that is great... um, i never said anything about murderers. i said inmates. once again you make assumptions on things that you really have no business doing unless you look at it indepth. read my response again. i wrote it slowly so even creationists can understand. hahaha
evolution accident? no
inmates = all murderers? no
jiujitsuman 4 years ago
The VAST majority of criminals are atheists, and even if you see some murderers have religion that doesn't mean that religion promotes killing.
BUT when it comes to atheism, KILLING is a DUTY and recommended by Darwin since it is the mechanism of Evolution and everyone MUST kill everyone in order to survive.
The conecption of Evolution is: everyone is everyone's enemy.
in the contrary: REligion always promotes peace and love for all people.
If people are corrupt, don't blame religion plz.
IslamPlanet 4 years ago
A deteministic world with no future would resemble what we see with some people today; greed ,do whatever you need to in order to 'get yours'no matter who you have to 'step on' to get ahead,attractive girls and boys selling themselves or their principles for fame or money,etc. yes there would be those who intuitively 'felt' their higher self and would not 'stoop'
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
thats how evolution works
we didnt kill everything weaker than us though, look at farms
we became the domminant species because we use and create tools
there is no god, there is no soul, when I die im dead
I wonder what happens to kids today when they claim when we die with rise up into some magic clowds and god takes to magic happy land
oniki2 4 years ago
one of the things I do like about your movies althought not related to what your eaching, is that you take the time to go back and awnser peoples responces as best you can
oniki2 4 years ago
Thankyou-I appreciate that you debate these ideas with me without getting sarcastic or dismissive
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
Please don't uncritically accept everything science preaches Those that profess that "There is no God" and ""there is no soul" are as dogmatic as any other fundamentalist. In matters spiritual, science doesn't know,and doesn't know that it doesn't know!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
i just have one question... do you beleive in the easter bunny too? is he in heaven?
jiujitsuman 4 years ago
So you believe that life arose by accident as a result of an admixture of mindless chemical reactions ,randomly combining in accordance with laws that no one created,all initiated in a primordal 'big bang'.That philosophy and art,music and love imagination and courage was all enfolded in that original cloud of dust, which one day,decided ,on it's own,to condense into a singularity that then exploaded into the world that we know...Now who is the one that believes in fairy tales!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
once again... not accident
we have explanations for these things if you tookk the time to read them. um... and i suppose the god that made all of this must be extremely complex to be able to create, the universe, read thoughts of every individual person etc. etc. so was this being just popped into existence? God raises more questions than answers pal. especially with no evidence.
jiujitsuman 4 years ago
James, I love the fact that you are so acceceable to your audince, but please head my words...DONT FEED THE TROLLS!
Also Im working through your videos and so far I like what I'm seeing.
blahbar 4 years ago
Good advice,Thankyou!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
Everything your saying is counter intuitive to what quantum mechanics says. I have been furiously researching this subject and I can honestly say that I have encountered not one shred of evidence that substantiates what your saying.
If you can direct me to a specific text, other than what you have stated, or a portion if a text (the chapter, the line)
joebot1 4 years ago
How about David Bohm,professor of Theoretical physics at Birbeck College in London, his book: Wholeness and the Implicate Order (London;Rutledge & Kegan Ltd,1981) Also the work of physicist Jack Sarfatti.
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
The problem I am having is that your arguments smack of 'zero point energy', It just doesn't make sense. You could argue that you can break the laws of thermodynamics, but without accurate theoretical reasoning, no one is going to believe you!.
joebot1 4 years ago
he's correct about Freund, he was a douche. but it doesn't mean that if a theory(that is proven a dozen times) sounds difficult for you to accept because of ur world view you should reject it. all in all this guy is a retard and i'm smart
metalician 4 years ago
Perhaps you are smart ,but are you wise...Do you measure your intelligence by how well you have accepted what you have been taught?! Do you ,rather, break free of indoctrination and explore the realm where those with wisdom have ventured?
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
I personally measure my intelligence by what I can create and my problem solving ability.
I think your out put is a much better indicator of your intelligence than anything else. Even if you were to argue that that is cunning, not intelligence, I would argue it is both and say your ability to make not just sense of the facts, but to do something useful with them is better than just assimilating the facts perfectly in any case!.
joebot1 4 years ago
I agree with your comment.Intelligence in action yielding a useful result reflects wisdom.
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
today we even know the truly nature of the thoughts, we're in the beginning of that knowledge
MAJORJANNA 4 years ago
Terrible what "they" want us to belief! I liked the way you summerized it! It is exactly as you say.
MirazBudejc 4 years ago
Thankyou for your comment.
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
Reality(physical)does not exist continuously, rather, Our physical reality 'blinks' off and on, one 'moment'here and the next not here--Our perception,of course , unable to perceive the gaps ( of 'non-existence')The entire 'physical 'universe blinks off and on in an eternal NOW; i.e. reality is dis-continuous. Planck's constant reveals much!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
It is only discontinuous if you think in three dimensional vectors AND if you think from the point of view of your self when looking at the electron!. I;m sure if the electron was as an entity it would understand exactly why these things appear the way they are because they would have evolved in that environment.
The only reason such concepts are alien to us is because we are from middle world! not the quantum world!.
joebot1 4 years ago
You are correct!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
The only think your argument has going for it is that our brains are a wonderful organ and work in an analogue way, this is where the link breaks down and fantasy begins, but hey, lets finish the book (Physics and Philosophy:The Revolution in Modern Science) before I go jumping to the same conclusion as the rest of the scientific community...
joebot1 4 years ago
Fair enough
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
I truly feel that you need to also read physicist , David Bohm's book : "Wholeness and The Implicate Order" ! How can you account for the fact that electrons continue to correlate their respective spins at space-time distances or that photons correlate their polarity while moving apart at the speed of light?!
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
I can't but to be fair, I'm not a physicists and never said I was, whats that got to do with healing your body with your mind, the world of the quantum has NOTHING to do with the world of the atomic and upwards with respect to universal laws.
joebot1 4 years ago
You are also suggesting that our mind is in some way able to manipulate the world of the quantum, this in both suggestion and practice is where your argument falls on it's ass to be honest!.
joebot1 4 years ago
May I also point out that the uncertainty principal was founded on the idea that photons would displace the behaviour of subparticles making impossible to know there speed and location.
That is not to say that measuring devices that do not exist yet using mass less particles predicted in string theory could not measure both without disturbing any sub particles.
Purely a theoretical point of view, making such a device is a complete other matter indeed!
joebot1 4 years ago
What is it you are trying to argue anyway, quantum fluctuations some how give us the power to heal the body? lol,????
Please explain the concept in detail!
joebot1 4 years ago
Quantum physics reveals what the ancients already knew; -man is the measure of all things- We are connected to 'All That Is' at some fundamental level...both beneath and beyond both quantum physics and realitivity
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
But the world of the quantum is separate and divided from the middle world we are familiar with, how can there be any correlation, they appear to operate by different rules?
joebot1 4 years ago
Yet the quantum world seems to somehow reasonate with the observer/measurer
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
how so, there is no evidence for this what so ever!
joebot1 4 years ago
Sure there is! Read physicists David Bohm ,Werner Heisenberg ,Jack Sarfatti or physicists Everett,Wheeler and Graham.Read the findings of Clinton Davisson at Bell Telephone Laboratories verifying the doctoral thesis of Physicist Louis de Broglies. Are you not familiar with the Clausen-Freedman experiments?
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
I can't say that I am familiar with everything on your list but heisenberg would surly turn in his grave if he could here what your proposing!
joebot1 4 years ago
Please re-read Heisenberg's "Physics and Philosophy:The Revolution in Modern Science"
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago
In fairness to your suggestion I have indeed visited the library and because I am good friends with the librarian I have managed to procure a copy from the reference part, there are two copies strangely enough, as there are two copies of the principia!.
Proper library!! lol
joebot1 4 years ago
ten points for you picking up on the fact that I spelled Jung wrong though!!.
joebot1 4 years ago
My advice, take a sabbatical and research what your saying thoroughly, you will find that your ideas are that born of someone who misinterprets the concepts in front of them!.
An anecdote to explain what you remind me of!
child asks :- 'if the black box of a plane is indestructible, why not make the whole pane out of that material!'
joebot1 4 years ago
I'm actually an engineer and a designer by trade so to say that I am useless and cannot apply my knowledge is pretty dumb, I have designed PA systems that are on the cutting edge of design.
Pocket arrays and the like!. I also study physics to a really obsessional degree, I can honestly say that my knowledge of psychology is pretty limited but I know enough to say that what your suggesting just simply isn't true not by any standard and no pear would endorse your view!.
joebot1 4 years ago
I never said that about you.Your comments also reveal a deep and persistent intellect of some consideral depth.You are certainly extraordinarily well read
JamesJTraitz 4 years ago