Added: 3 years ago
From: danklaue
Views: 7,984
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • THE PRORAY (DESIGN) HAS SAME ROTOR AREA, SAME COCKPIT SIZE BUT THE REST OF THE BODYWORK IS LESS THAN HALF THE SIZE, AND HAS VERY LOW SQUAT (AND FIXED) UNDERCARRIAGE AND ENOUGH WIEGHT SAVING FOR TWO EXTRA OCCUPANTS WITH SAME POWER! UTUBE SEARCH...PRORAY.

  • THE COCKPIT IS TOO SMALL OR THERE IS TOO MUCH OF THE REST OF IT. A LOT OF BODY-WORK AND SMALL ROTOR DIAMETER. LOOK UP THE HILLER FLYING PLATFORM YOUTUBE AND SEE THE ONLY REAL HOPE FOR THE FLYING CAR.

  • Dare I say, it looks like the Osprey without the BS. Still though not as impressive as the Aeroscraft, the Ekip and the GeoBat

  • I take that as a complement.

    Not as impressive as the Axiom (Wall-E) either, but those are all a totally different class of aircraft. I don't really see how it relates to the Verticopter. With the Verticopter, it's not about size, but about efficient, high-speed, point-to-point transport.

  • Is it about payload as well?

  • Great 3D rendering and a wonderful viceo. Well done.

  • Wow nice plane design. Interesting model. I like the way it's introduced

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more