THE PRORAY (DESIGN) HAS SAME ROTOR AREA, SAME COCKPIT SIZE BUT THE REST OF THE BODYWORK IS LESS THAN HALF THE SIZE, AND HAS VERY LOW SQUAT (AND FIXED) UNDERCARRIAGE AND ENOUGH WIEGHT SAVING FOR TWO EXTRA OCCUPANTS WITH SAME POWER! UTUBE SEARCH...PRORAY.
THE COCKPIT IS TOO SMALL OR THERE IS TOO MUCH OF THE REST OF IT. A LOT OF BODY-WORK AND SMALL ROTOR DIAMETER. LOOK UP THE HILLER FLYING PLATFORM YOUTUBE AND SEE THE ONLY REAL HOPE FOR THE FLYING CAR.
Not as impressive as the Axiom (Wall-E) either, but those are all a totally different class of aircraft. I don't really see how it relates to the Verticopter. With the Verticopter, it's not about size, but about efficient, high-speed, point-to-point transport.
THE PRORAY (DESIGN) HAS SAME ROTOR AREA, SAME COCKPIT SIZE BUT THE REST OF THE BODYWORK IS LESS THAN HALF THE SIZE, AND HAS VERY LOW SQUAT (AND FIXED) UNDERCARRIAGE AND ENOUGH WIEGHT SAVING FOR TWO EXTRA OCCUPANTS WITH SAME POWER! UTUBE SEARCH...PRORAY.
Justwantahover 4 months ago
THE COCKPIT IS TOO SMALL OR THERE IS TOO MUCH OF THE REST OF IT. A LOT OF BODY-WORK AND SMALL ROTOR DIAMETER. LOOK UP THE HILLER FLYING PLATFORM YOUTUBE AND SEE THE ONLY REAL HOPE FOR THE FLYING CAR.
Justwantahover 9 months ago
Dare I say, it looks like the Osprey without the BS. Still though not as impressive as the Aeroscraft, the Ekip and the GeoBat
DChatc 2 years ago
I take that as a complement.
Not as impressive as the Axiom (Wall-E) either, but those are all a totally different class of aircraft. I don't really see how it relates to the Verticopter. With the Verticopter, it's not about size, but about efficient, high-speed, point-to-point transport.
danklaue 2 years ago
Is it about payload as well?
DChatc 2 years ago
Great 3D rendering and a wonderful viceo. Well done.
Ecocandle 3 years ago
Wow nice plane design. Interesting model. I like the way it's introduced
tiemji 3 years ago