Funny how "amigosmusica" says that Sokolov's playing "sounds like a struggle." Personally, I don't think so. I think, first of all, that he has a technique of the first order. Secondly, I think he is making a musical choice with the broad tempo in the cadenza, and he makes the piece sound like it CLIMAXES in the cadenza, after all the brilliant stuff that comes before it, rather than the other way around. Sokolov makes this work, despite folks like Horowitz and Bolet saying it's too much!
Truly hair-raising and goose pimples....I have cherished every concert I have heard of his every year for over 15 years. He is so versatile - from the delicate Clementi works he loves to Chopin and Prokofiev. Wish he would perform this live sometime. His tone is mesmerizing live helped by the effect of the dark hall with the single light on him.....
wow!!! at last a great version comparable to berman's including the cadenza. just perfect! a little overacting perhaps but if you just hear is perfect sound and musicality talking too
In my opinion. Too much pedal, muddy sounding piano perhaps, The cadenza is a bear.
My favorites Cliburn and Berman. Don't know what to make of the Gavrilov rendition really. Either a brilliant soulful creation or an off day. Can anyone tell me more about his aledged alcohol usage?
Wonderful clear finger work...can´t say "great technique" though....way too pounded, exaggerated, over acted...the cadenza sounds like a huge struggle...and it shouldn´t be that way, considering his facility.
maybe not easier, just different. Rachmaninoff and Horowitz were romantic pianists, not sentimental. However Rachmaninoff's music in general and ossia version of cadenza in particularly is a huge field for sentimental interpretations, that are more accessible for not musicians.
I read about the lack of power. Wrong. Just dont look at the video but just listen. Sokolov was and is a master, the ideal pianist. Keep listening over and over. Just great performance.
Wrong notes?? First of all I don't hear so many wrong notes. Maybe it's me, but I've been listening to this piece for over 40 years and have almost 80 recordings and this is one of the most fantastic performances I've ever seen or heard! Sokolov is an example of a what a great pianist can do!!
with Sokolov I always have the idea he is really playing e v e r y single note (although some of them are wrong:P), you can't say that of other pianists.
I'd far prefer twice as many wrong notes if that's what it took to get this incredible passion and musicality. Wrong notes are trivial when you're dealing with an artist.
I agree with everyone above -- except to add the justly famous Cliburn/Kondrashin 1957 to the list, and possibly (for an entirely different take, smaller in scale but with incredible intensity in their own right) the two Janis recordings and the incredible Merzhanov.
Thank you so much for putting this performance up! In this section (part 2 of the 5) I was particularly mesmerized (despite the undeniable power and authority of the first half of the cadenza) by the whole section beginning with the "water" effects as the orchestra rejoins him -- from that point forward the left hand brings out a whole series of inner lines that I had never heard properly before. Really, really wonderful, magical music-making!
The hammers on that piano are like marshmellows...no projective power at all! He is using a piano much more suited to a Mozart concerto than Rachmaninoff.
There is some truth in what you write. I just have been at one of Sokolov's recitals. He made the technician get the hammers very very soft. But he produces the biggest sound - even on this soft intonated hammers.
Should we ever reply to an ignorant who cannot even distinguish the sound from the performance itself and the distortion through the recording? If so, not seriously.:)
I agree, it's obviously the distortion of the recording. His sound, heard live, is magnificent, one of the most beautiful tones of any pianist today. I heard him in person in 1996.
I think it is because he really dislike the whole publicity thing. His founding belief is that music is enough for your whole life so why add in something silly like being famous? haha he is truly amazing
@IAMLISZT Unknown???????????? In what cave have you been living the past 10 years? He is acknowledged as one of the greatest piano virtuoso of our times!
WOW! He is so awesome!!! favorited.
g7727 4 months ago
Which 3 dribbling cretins gave this the thumbs down?
swirls999 7 months ago
The guy's a bona fide genius!
sll10 9 months ago
Many Many Tears, The Whole Thing Is Beautiful! But The Cadenza Frickin' Rocked! Grigory Sokolov = Man-Enough!! (To tk on Rach... ) !
Millard234 11 months ago
What a pity that sound quality isn't so good !!!!
TheFryderyk1 1 year ago
you should watch from 0:00 until 0:14 without sound!!!!
IceCrawler777 1 year ago
Very nice performance ! but sound quality isn't so good =(
Pirotechnik1995 1 year ago
Funny how "amigosmusica" says that Sokolov's playing "sounds like a struggle." Personally, I don't think so. I think, first of all, that he has a technique of the first order. Secondly, I think he is making a musical choice with the broad tempo in the cadenza, and he makes the piece sound like it CLIMAXES in the cadenza, after all the brilliant stuff that comes before it, rather than the other way around. Sokolov makes this work, despite folks like Horowitz and Bolet saying it's too much!
klavierspieler72 1 year ago
so powerful cadenza..
eltachimetro 1 year ago
Los rusos siempre serán los mejores, tienen una escuela y una tradición fuera de serie.
Ricarkaza 1 year ago
Truly hair-raising and goose pimples....I have cherished every concert I have heard of his every year for over 15 years. He is so versatile - from the delicate Clementi works he loves to Chopin and Prokofiev. Wish he would perform this live sometime. His tone is mesmerizing live helped by the effect of the dark hall with the single light on him.....
MrSevenOranges 1 year ago
@MrSevenOranges I meant Rameau rather than Clementi....
MrSevenOranges 1 year ago
wow!!! at last a great version comparable to berman's including the cadenza. just perfect! a little overacting perhaps but if you just hear is perfect sound and musicality talking too
vlad432 2 years ago
In my opinion. Too much pedal, muddy sounding piano perhaps, The cadenza is a bear.
My favorites Cliburn and Berman. Don't know what to make of the Gavrilov rendition really. Either a brilliant soulful creation or an off day. Can anyone tell me more about his aledged alcohol usage?
Thanks.
mrjlowitz 2 years ago
Wonderful clear finger work...can´t say "great technique" though....way too pounded, exaggerated, over acted...the cadenza sounds like a huge struggle...and it shouldn´t be that way, considering his facility.
amigosmusica 2 years ago
Good interpretation
BrookHornblower 2 years ago
very interesting, this is answering a lot of questions. Why Rachmaninoff and Horowitz played it so extremely fast, for example.
Besdonaz 2 years ago
I sight-read both versions.
The chords are easier once you understand the harmony progressions. It comes pretty easy under my small hands.
The ossia version has many hands-crossing which I feel uncomfortable.
Thicker texture makes it easier to "cheat", thinner texture makes it more difficult.
Richteralan 2 years ago
What I want to know is why does everyone besides Horowitz and Rachmaninoff play the Ossia cadenza? I do like it I just want to know why
everythingistken1291 2 years ago
Argerich played the one as horowitz and rach as well
MrToulis93 2 years ago
The ossia version is actually easier. Many people (who don't understand piano) take huge chords and loud sound to be difficult.
Richteralan 2 years ago
maybe not easier, just different. Rachmaninoff and Horowitz were romantic pianists, not sentimental. However Rachmaninoff's music in general and ossia version of cadenza in particularly is a huge field for sentimental interpretations, that are more accessible for not musicians.
Sorry, i'm not english-speaker.
Besdonaz 2 years ago
sokolov is my favorite pianist, his technique, the most powerfull and melodic notes i have ever heard , the feeling... simply.... AMAZING!
socarra 2 years ago 5
i feel with you! sokolov is best of all!
klausknulp 2 years ago 2
Sokolov's haircut is that of either a 9 yr old girl or a Medieval servant.
freeqwerqwer 2 years ago 31
It used to be called the Prince Valiant haircut.
Obaysch 2 years ago
@freeqwerqwer it looks a little bit like Franz Lizst doesn't he? Maybe is some kind of tribute :)
Zengui 5 months ago
sokolov is god
leonicle 2 years ago 5
I read about the lack of power. Wrong. Just dont look at the video but just listen. Sokolov was and is a master, the ideal pianist. Keep listening over and over. Just great performance.
LukeMD 2 years ago 3
the coolest thing is the guy in the audience w/the tinted glasses
ayso78 2 years ago 6
Wrong notes?? First of all I don't hear so many wrong notes. Maybe it's me, but I've been listening to this piece for over 40 years and have almost 80 recordings and this is one of the most fantastic performances I've ever seen or heard! Sokolov is an example of a what a great pianist can do!!
sll10 2 years ago 6
¡Tremendo! Casi como la versión de Lazar Berman con Abbado/LSO.
hyperklavier 2 years ago
Sokolov is a god.
pgbollig 2 years ago 3
with Sokolov I always have the idea he is really playing e v e r y single note (although some of them are wrong:P), you can't say that of other pianists.
pianostef 3 years ago 4
my favourite part is from 03:40 to 05:10..so much expressions and emotions...he is really a god on the piano!
shaermy 3 years ago
So many wrong notes..
principecalaf 3 years ago
I'd far prefer twice as many wrong notes if that's what it took to get this incredible passion and musicality. Wrong notes are trivial when you're dealing with an artist.
jmanpianofan 3 years ago 4
I agree with everyone above -- except to add the justly famous Cliburn/Kondrashin 1957 to the list, and possibly (for an entirely different take, smaller in scale but with incredible intensity in their own right) the two Janis recordings and the incredible Merzhanov.
iedsri 3 years ago
Merzhanov is incredible indeed (and much, much too little known), but the famous Cliburn/Kondrashin collaboration was recorded in 1958, not 1957.
weikko79 3 years ago
Thank you so much for putting this performance up! In this section (part 2 of the 5) I was particularly mesmerized (despite the undeniable power and authority of the first half of the cadenza) by the whole section beginning with the "water" effects as the orchestra rejoins him -- from that point forward the left hand brings out a whole series of inner lines that I had never heard properly before. Really, really wonderful, magical music-making!
iedsri 3 years ago
His musicality are amazing
michelmans 3 years ago
for me is the best! Rubistein and Sokolov...and no more...
amaryllikb 3 years ago 4
Artur Rubinstein? I didn't know he even performed the Rach3.
weikko79 3 years ago
Yeah, Sokolov of course, but what about Richter?
nbharakey 3 years ago
Umm Richter never played this concerto, if you want to hear another recording i would recommend Ashkenazy/Previn...
ThomasJBromley 3 years ago
My comment was reply to amaryllikb who said "for me is the best! Rubistein and Sokolov...and no more..."
nbharakey 3 years ago
15 years ago Sokolov played here in Macedonia... I was only 5 years old and I remember... I know that hi will have
success in life... Probably hi is ine of the best pianist of all the time...
Barmomk 3 years ago 5
je pense la même chose que vous.
C'est un musicien vraiment complet,et j'aime aussi comment il sculpte le son.
Il est fabuleux dans certaines études de Chopin!
Ici,dans ce concerto,il est tout simplement impérial.
antoinezygfryd 3 years ago
I'm really socked.This must be one of the greatest performances if not the best!!!!!!!!!!!!
Amazing pianist
chrislibhi 3 years ago
The hammers on that piano are like marshmellows...no projective power at all! He is using a piano much more suited to a Mozart concerto than Rachmaninoff.
NordicHealer 3 years ago
Are you crazy......?
jhc0907 3 years ago 4
There is some truth in what you write. I just have been at one of Sokolov's recitals. He made the technician get the hammers very very soft. But he produces the biggest sound - even on this soft intonated hammers.
tgpiano 3 years ago 4
Should we ever reply to an ignorant who cannot even distinguish the sound from the performance itself and the distortion through the recording? If so, not seriously.:)
16jsjs52 3 years ago
I agree, it's obviously the distortion of the recording. His sound, heard live, is magnificent, one of the most beautiful tones of any pianist today. I heard him in person in 1996.
zkool5 3 years ago 2
never understood why sokolov is so unkown. truly fabulous pianist.
IAMLISZT 3 years ago 26
I think it is because he really dislike the whole publicity thing. His founding belief is that music is enough for your whole life so why add in something silly like being famous? haha he is truly amazing
vocalpianist 3 years ago 6
@IAMLISZT it's because he won't do many recordings.
rebelcaptain01 1 year ago
@IAMLISZT Cause he hates rec studios and loves to play live. A real pianist.
BSA2417666 1 year ago
@IAMLISZT Unknown???????????? In what cave have you been living the past 10 years? He is acknowledged as one of the greatest piano virtuoso of our times!
SSchrevel 1 year ago
@IAMLISZT Of course you'd recognize his talent, you're Liszt. (Write something with a decent melody for once.)
hymnofashes 6 months ago
Holy shit. This is instant classic!
zkool5 3 years ago
A very great musician. I appreciate his playing-style very much.
musicusblau 3 years ago
A recital by Grigory Sokolov is like a vision of a lost age of Russian pianism. bravo bravo bravo!!!!!!!!!
liu868 3 years ago 2
one of the last great romantic Russian pianists. golden tones and a God like musician.
chad410 3 years ago