All this alien stuff would be a lot more believable if those who keep making up this stuff would give the aliens limitations an inferiority. You can say they're smarter, and I may be able to believe you (If we didn't have dark ages all the time, we'd be that advanced) but when you start saying that even their bones are more advanced; that's when I start to call shenanigans.
Can't someone make up alien stories where the aliens Aren't better in every single way?
oh, now I understand what the bible was complaining about.Lets see, you have men from outer space (angels) mating with woman on earth. Didn't that all end with a failed extinction event?
Wow ^___^ That is a crazy skull huh... That would be one ugly human as far as looks :/ Probably very smart and strong bones in other places... These people commenting are ignoring the thickness of the skull and how amazing that is. It basically meant this person must have had very strong bones.
I also love how in the line up of skulls all the other ones are perfect representations of a human skull. Line it up with skulls from twins joined at the head or other deformed skulls see which ones seem more alien.
obviously not an alien. You do realize that a whole lot of crazy deformities can occur in development. There are countless people born with 2 faces, bones missing, bones grown where they where not supposed to grow. We don't really know the causes, but obviously this "star child" is a rare unique deformity.
As for this DNA evidence, if it were true people would know about it and SETI would be going nuts but as of now in the real world there is no evidence of aliens
the skull shows signs of deformation, what we have here is a sign of radiation back then. travel safe with this information you just took the blue pill if you know what i mean, no alien to bad
A simple internet search yields that this was in fact a small child with human dna/chromosomes and died of congenital hydrocephalus. Man's imagination knows no bounds!
''Starchild'' suffered from a congenital defect, specifically Brachycephaly and exorbitism. The evidence supports the fact that the ''Starchild'' was not an alien, as it suffered from various human congenital defects that are known and well documented.
Pye is a charlatan. History is replete with snake-oil salesmen trying to ply their wares on the uneducated and gullible and this is no different.
When some stars explode, they send star dust shooting throughout the univers. When this dust contaminates other planests. The building blocks of life are then created. We are literaly all star children. Living in the golden age for life in this univers. Sometimes it's important to remember where you came from. So you appreciate what you've been given here. Because it's not always going to be this way. Some day, the univers will be dark again. Be thankful you're here now.
we are all hybrids. there is no logic possibility that any type of extra terrestrial would be in any way similar to us if we were not some how related to them
The Starchild has no expansion of its foramen magnum, there is a "crease" along the rear of its sagittal suture, and a CAT scan showed the suture itself was not fused. Therefore, the Starchild can't possibly have been hydro cephalic.
That is cute man.. All that time and money we have invested with Lloyd.. and we are con artists.. You guys need to get a grip.
@TheHeretic333 I know for a fact you are full of shit. First hand. So spread your filth elsewhere. I have worked with the starchild skull hands on and can tell you it is most certainly not fully of this world.There are fibers woven into the bone, the brain capacity is almost twice that of a human skull. Please stop taking like you are informed, because you most certainly are NOT. Let me guess you also know for a fact that we have not been visited by EBE's. 3 words disclosure project interviews.
@monstermash2011 Wait whaaaat? Hold on... I support the hybrid theory!! Read all my comments man lol. Lloyd is one of my lifelong colleagues! We don't meet much in person anymore, but I can PM you our emails if you would like.
Respond to this video... Many people on here said that this skull was just Human. and was in fact just a very bad case of Hydrocephalus, I proved to them that it was not.
me- "The Starchild has no expansion of its foramen magnum, there is a "crease" along the rear of its sagittal suture, and a CAT scan showed the suture itself was not fused. Therefore, the Starchild can't possibly have been hydro cephalic."
ha ha "The earth is flat" ha ha "the sun revolves around us" ha ha "we are at the center of the galaxy" ha ha "pandas are just mystical creatures" ha ha "bigfoots dont exist.. because where are their bones?!"
I am going to stop on that one lol because its funny they said this..
Because there is not one single fossilized bone of a chimpanzee in the world today.. SO THEY DONT EXIST? so absurd.. They live in whats called the lower montane jungles.. a classification that humans inhabit 1% of.
sorry but this is not alien / hybrid because if it was dont you think that the skull and pye would have been disappeared by now by the powers that be,this is what were all told by all the conspiracy nuts, if this was truly the smoking gun then dont you think that we would never have heard about it. At its best its a distraction to keep people from the real truth.
i think it's funny when ppl say "you are wrong and then reply: no you are wrong" and so on and so on, have u ever stopped and thought maybe you're both wrong?
ppl believe in things way to easily and become stupid. read, learn as much as you can and then look deep into it, and make sure the source is not of some untrustworthy site like some cover-up story that most ppl fall for and then think they know everything. there are plenty of fake truthers out there
We are all aliens, we are all from somewhere else.. our leaders are reptilian hybrids posing as full humans they are not!
We have 12 other alien races in our DNA.
Humans on earth are a genetic experiment. No other races have these combinations of genes. It doesnt appear to be working !
There is inner conflict between our reptilian /mammalian DNA, which then expands and reflects into the external, outer world., causing war and destruction.
@Akirameerkat the skull has no sinuses what so ever. you can be the ugliest of uglies. You will still be born with some trace of sinuses. The Nuclear DNA was somewhat recovered. lets put it this way. we are 60% similar to rats. We are less than 40% similar to the starchild. as far as the father.
@TheHeretic333 people with Holoprosencephaly doesn't have nasal cavities or a nose period. look it u, and look up the dupuytren and mutter, and you will see stranger deformities then the star child.
@Akirameerkat ... these people also have HUMAN dna. The starchild's DNA profile reveals a human mother and a complete UNKNOWN as the father, not found in any known database. Human deformities have human dna profiles.
@Akirameerkat ok.. and the nuclear DNA that we finally saved up to process and examine...
was almost less than 40% putting the similarity 20% below rats. Please my friend, fight for truth, so love may venture, and peace may follow... (search "everything you know is wrong lloyd pye") please I humbly request that you please do this, If anyone here is a truth seeker, I believe it is in your best interest to take notes or at least watch the presentation for a half-hour.
@TheHeretic333 are you talking about his belief that humans were created by aliens, which there is no evidence for, the skull is an anomaly but it is not from another world, as if there are aliens, which there probably are all across the universe, they have probably evolved completely different from us, and wouldn't resemble our biological appearance at all, they would probably also have a different carbon molecule then DNA for there anatomy.
@TheHeretic333 one abnormal skull is not evidence, Lloyd pye isn't credible, his skull is circumstantial at best, if I heard a real biologist or other scientist show evidence then I would agree.
@Akirameerkat IT IS NOT ABNORMAL. it is PERFECT. sorry =[ Modern Science has one tiny flaw, that something cannot be true without terrestrial evidence. not to bully, but have you even seen at least an hour's worth of starchild material?
@TheHeretic333 its abnormal because its not a regular shaped human skull, I have watched some of the videos about it, only evidence tells the truth, but the evidence of this skull is circumstantial, as it doesn't provide definitive proof of any alien species visiting earth, because there are plenty of skulls like it of children born with Hydrocephaly, there is a Hydrocephalus skeleton in Brazil that they call starchild 2. if there was say, a piece of alien technology found with it, --
@TheHeretic333 they have no proof that the Y chromosome is not from earth, the chances that aliens look like us and Have DNA is one in a google. Its not redesigned its deformed, it is not an alien hybrid, its more likely the love child of a woman and another animal then an alien hybrid. watch the program, "Origins, where are the aliens" with Niel De-grass Tyson., and then maybe you will understand why this is not an alien hybrid.
@TheGoatherdGod Preliminary DNA testing has revealed the Nuclear Y chromosome in the DNA, or the material passed down from the father that we got something going on.. the health database had "no similarities found" in nice blue bold... This stupid drumbeat and the picture of the skull... You guys think I waste my time.. Excuse me while I continue being all Indiana Jones, while you guys stand back, and troll. Wow what boring lives.. I criticize because its apparent how dark you all wish to be
No the owner "claim" he got a phone call with the preliminary DNA test result beeing like that, and when the DNA test was done it proved to be a human child with Hydrocephalus.
You are merely falling for the hoax of a con artist who wanna make some cash! very much Indiana Jones indeed LMAO.
And in doing so you are insulting every human beeing who have ever sufferd from Hydrocephalus!
When a person tries to pull a confidence trick on you, you better check some real sources.
@TheGoatherdGod The geneticist working on the Starchild Skull discovered that its mtDNA (the part of DNA passed only through the maternal line) was radically different from human DNA. The maximum number of mtDNA differences between all humans is 120. The Starchild Skull has between 800-1,000. This is a partial result, but it is enough to be definitive: the Skull’s mtDNA is NOT HUMAN! Do I have to keep telling you people...people with Hydrocephalus are 99% similar to us.. Starchild is < 40%
No the geneticist who worked on it found it was HUMAN, don't try to give me a lecture about DNA im a Biochemist and i do this kinda sh*t every day.
The first result will in all cases involving old bones give a fked up result and in the end a real one unless a fraud, i KNOW this. What you are saying is "trust the conartist not the expert"
Do i need to keep telling you people you are falling for the lies of a conartist trying to make cash?
@TheGoatherdGod Hydrocephalics have what is called "water on the brain," but it's actually spinal fluid that can't drain out properly. When you are born with that problem, your head blows up like a balloon, so the pressure is uniform in all directions, with no direction favored over another. Also, in untreated infants, the pressure is constant until part of the cerebellum (a part of the brain) is squeezed out of the foramen magnum opening where the spine enters the skull, and death occurs.
The starchild did not die as a child. it had its wisdoms..Errors or not, we can be supremely confident that the confirmed total of the Starchild’s differences will fall between 800 and 1000 bp, while all humans are 120 or less. Using the most effective techniques science can bring to bear to solve any problem of genetic heritage, techniques that are used with finality in court cases worldwide, the Starchild is shown to be nowhere near the ballpark of human or prehuman. This result is definitive.
@TheGoatherdGod YOU DON'T SEE STARCHILD BUMPER STICKERS OR COFFEE MUGS OR WALL POSTERS OR HALLOWEEN MASKS OR MARDI GRAS MASKS, OR CHILDREN'S PAJAMAS, ALL OF WHICH WERE POSSIBLE WITH THE MONEY THEY WERE SAVING FOR THE DNA TEST. THEY HAVE ALL PLAYED IT STRAIGHT AND IN EVERY CASE TRIED TO DO THE RIGHT THING WITH IT, AND THAT, MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE, IS WHAT WILL MAKE THEIR MONEY AND MAKE THEM FAMOUS WHEN THEY RECOVER THE STARCHILD'S ENTIRE GENOME AND ARE FREE TO ANNOUNCE IT TO THE WORLD.
@TheGoatherdGod Feel sorry for me? Why. What do I lose out of proving to you Aliens exist.
What is reality, in your point of view?
I have sent him cash, and I will monthly.. send him what I can. Because he is legit. You are just too busy grinding a heavenly worn axe, locked in the godforsaken void that almost consumed me before my adult years. You go ahead and join hands with Creationism and Darwinism, tape your eyes shut, and walk down the path together, and have exciting, blissful lives.
@TheGoatherdGod I email this guy back and forth everyday. I know what he does with his money. I am not anyone's victim, besides that of my Government. He brings raw facts, you CHOOSE not to see them.
@TheHeretic333 I would hate to repeat myself, but you can be born without a nose. but sinuses? give me a break. Also we might appear to be kissing cousins to apes. what is it like 95% similar? we are intrinsic to rats by a factor of what like 60%? So what mammal has under 60%? I dont know but.. for a skull to be less than 40% intrinsic than its grave planet.. What do you say? Nature can do anything? Wake up! Fight the STUPIDS!!!
@TheHeretic333 --like a ben ten omnitrix, lol, but seriously, if Aliens did visit earth, and did genetic experiments, then why is this the only skull that exists that seems to show that, there should be dozens all over the place, also, why did they do it once and leave? personally I think Llyod pye developed his theory after watching the episode of johnny quest called Moai mystery, where a Moai alien takes a primitive ape and uses an evolution ray making him into a modern human.
@Akirameerkat read the full description under the video. The mitochondrial dna WAS recoverable and datable to 900 or so years in age, the nuclear was NOT. That in and of itself is telling. It should show up in a database. It did not. This would be something to be expected if it was millions of years old, no way though in such a recent skull.
@kensmind that does not mean its alien, it means its a strange anomaly, it should be researched and tested more, so it can be separated from things like the photoshop hoax of the giant skeletons, though I would like to hear what scientists like Neil Degrass Tyson, and Michio Kaku, Steven Hawking would say about it, as I have never seen this skull on any scientific programs, but only hear on youtube, I do believe that their probability is high that alien beings exist,---
@kensmind--due to the size of the Universe, the number of exo-planets, stars, Galaxies, that there are, but Its highly improbable that any have visited earth, actually able to find our tiny world in the boondocks milky way, travel that thousands of light years just to make a hybrid child that doesn't even survive and then leave without a trace, leaving this odd skull for us to find and debate about.
@kensmind I am looking at another video on it, that talks about a 2010 DNA test on it, study of the teeth, show that it wasn't actually a child, but an adult when it died, there are many strange things about this skull, just because it doesn't have all Human DNA, we should not jump the conclusion that it is Alien right away.
Right, Lets grab a skull from a kid that had a genetic deformation like many kids today, and assume its some fucking alien hybrid breed bullshit. God damn humans can be so fucking dumb sometimes.
If they cant impregnate an ape with human material. What would make our genetics so compatible with a bing from another planet? its absolutely impossible. Your stupid for believing this
@VikingVern7 I don't believe this shit whatsoever, but an Alien species capable of traveling light years in a efficient time frame will most definitely have the ability to mix species. But again, this is all bullshit. Can't believe some people
their not adding up the acts the right way! their comparing the alien like skull of a child with a skull of a full grown human! if this is going to work right then they need to do it like this. say that the skull is 900 years old but what ever it was, died at the age of 9 years old. you have to then compare it with a skull of today that belongs to a 9 year old human to know for sure if it is an alien skull or not. adult and child skulls look different because their both different ages.
Looks to me a kid got smashed in the face, it survived and lived for some time with a weird face. I wonder if people laughed at him, or cried for him.
It's a developmental defect resulting in some hideous baby fated to die within hours, Or a set of twins joined at the head also destined to die within hours. Either way it's still human, and not other worldly. Read a fucking text book before posting idiotic videos about aliens.
@BrootalMetalBanjo You ALSO are wrong. Teeth were also recovered along with the skull showing it to be an adult very advanced in age. It was not a child at the time of its death. Next time YOU post idiotic info you should do your homework.
@kensmind Exactly what I was gonna say. They determined that this was an adult skull and not a child who could've possibly of died at a very early age due to its deformity. This person managed to live a long enough life.
@Nekhet ... small adult humans have HUMAN dna. The starchild skull's mitochondrial and nuclear dna profile reveal a human mother and a complete UNKNOWN as the father, not falling into any known database.
Clone me and transfer my good memories and whatever wisdom I may have into the clone. Thats the ticket to immortality, might want some enhancement like two hearts and a better liver. The ability to through a 105 mph fast ball for 9 innings would be nice too. LOL
Why is everyone so surprise at this? There is so much proof of another species or up graded humans on this planet I find it hard for people not to believe it. Two examples are the fact that a bunch of people could not cut a thousand ton monolith of granite with stone or copper tools out of a mountain and haul it up a mountain and raise it with plant fiber ropes. Or the nickle steel column over 40 feet long found in India in 1700's we could not produce that until the late 1800's.
Why is everyone so surprise at this? There is so much proof of another species or up graded humans on this planet I find it hard for people not to believe it. Two example is the fact that a bunch of people could not cut a thousand ton monolith of granite with stone or copper tools out of a mountain and haul it up a mountain and raise it with plant fiber ropes. Or the Nicole steel column over 40 feet long found in India in 1700's we could not produce that until the late 1800's.
5) Hard to give a full explanation on why they didnt get a match with the second piece of DNA but in the footage a 232 length sequence is used first and then a 342 sequence used. I'm unsure why they would have queried two differing lengths.
6) Contamination, test error, artefact or possibly even a section of DNA linked to the possible disease are all potential reasons why they couldn't get a match.
He is chatting shit and funnily enough the word "money" comes up at the end
I'm surprised by the possibility out of two they got one section of sequence from the mitochondria.
4) I tried to identify the sequnce they got that they called human but the # doesnt match up to anything. I strongly suspect that it is from the nucleus. This would completely discount his idea about using a human egg for the mitochonfira only.
3) Mitochondrial DNA is comprised of 13 genes in humans (I think, if not it is a very small number in comparison to the nuclear DNA; in excess of 20,000). I would assume the DNA extraction method may have excluded the mitochondrial DNA because you tend to centrifuge and fractionate your samples and the nucleus comes out in a different fraction to the mitochondria. Even if the sample was perfect and all DNA (nuclear and mitochondrial) was present during the test, I'm surprised
2) First example is that shotgun DNA sequencing should have generated more sections of DNA; rather than just two sequences. I'd like to know the full results of this as I suspect he has omitted more sequences and these are in fact human.
I'm pretty sure the consensus on this one was that the kid suffered some sort of developmental disease. Although I don't know which actual disease, but I don't think it is hard to imagine such a disease.
Here is why I think there are problems with his line of thinking:
1) There seems to be a lot of missing information and misleading ideas.
You guys are not keeping up on this. Mr. Pye has had several tests done on this skull, including DNA, and it is not coming up as anything known to this earth.
This isn't some crazy alien hybrid skull, you guys are just bat-shit crazy. This was proven to be a child from 3-5 years with a physical deformity...The list of diseases and defects that can do this is extensive. This is just a messed up kid..
go to the Huntarian museum in London and you'll see things a milion times more bizare than this... The DNA thing is a bit of a mystery but the shape is quite like a hydrocephalic skull.
im a achristian and all but i think he just deformed from his mother being "old" and have a baby with downsyndrom or another disease like it that we don't know of today!
@GenuineLarry Please read the top rated comment. Even if it was deformed by some defect it would still show up 100% human in a dna test. This showed up as 40% human 60% unknown.
I would love to see a professional facial reconstruction artist do up a clay-face of this skull. The artist renditions in the video strike me as stylized, and I have no way to determine if they have any scientific backing behind them.
1:42 a cabbage patch kid from outerspace! Run. In the future, they will dig up Roy Dennis' (Rocky) Look him up. He died in 1982 from elephantitis . They will think he was from another galaxy. This was just a malformation.
even if this is a genetic defect the genes would be identified. i.e. someone with an enlarged skull would still be identified as 100% human dna. same with every other known species. deformities dont affect species identification or dna identification. so the fact that 60% of the genes in the skull are not identified with any known species on earth is alarming.
@MrEk24 Pathetic that you are trying to suggest that 60% that was not recoverable from degradation is evidence that they were "not identified with any known species". You are intentionally confounding the concepts of identifying, with recovering. To simply say its unidentifiable is misleading if it was never recovered. DNA from old skulls is often unrecoverable. Enough of the DNA exists to know Its mother & father were HUMAN and it belonged to Haplogroup C (common in Native Americans)
I'd be very interested to see a reconstruction of the face... I know we can do it with regular human skulls to see what they may have looked like, so why not this one?
some type, a mouth, and probably had two arms and two legs as well. So when some of the DNA does appear to be human did it never occur that of course it should. It's when there are sections that don't match with anything in our database that cause concearn. BTW for you non believers, defects don't appear as unidentified genes, those would appear as defects, just like we have in our own genes.
Well its funny you say there are no videos saying its not human. I dunno why some people are taking the DNA results as such, including myself. Perhaps because there are some DNA sections that appear human, and some that they know aren't. I guess what it comes down to is non believers are attesting that if it were alien, there is no way it could ANY DNA that looks human at all. While believers are saying otherwise. Let me sum it up for all you that are confused. He has a head, with eyes of......
@betafreak39 a disease most likely..either a form of elephantiasis or hydro-encephali..both can cause bone deformation and both are quite nasty..however it could also be an ancient attempt at head binding..but an interesting find none the less..some form of congenital issue..its quite amazing the poor thing lived as long as it did..hard to tell if adult or younger...either way I don't imagine this person had a very happy existence.
DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD, a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes"
@bloty02 Potential explanations for the skull's unusual features include the use of cradle boarding on a hydrocephalic child, brachycephaly and Crouzon syndrome.
Took me 30 seconds to find that on Wikipedia, less time than it takes to post this note
@belisariusorb yes,, seems much more logical than jumping to the coclusion that it came from another planet which most people seem to do. I agree with you, you can't expect me to find it on wikipedia within 30 seconds though,,lol.
@bloty02 Just by understanding the concept of relative probabilities (congenital disease likely, alien skull in a cave unlikely) puts you way ahead of the ufo-heads who want to see something alien and won't let logic get in the way. Cheers.
@belisariusorb You are a MORON. Your quick glib answer does NOT address the issues of the father's nuclear DNA, which does not appear to be human at all. All known deformities have already been tested for and this is none of them.
@joemcbobinite and i mean like put it into a computer and then the computer breaks it down and finds matches, obviously if there is none itd be alien.to find out where it came from wed obviously need a computer that has data on all lifeforms everywhere and we dont since we havent collected from "everywhere" i kinda wanna know if it had telekinesis lol.
@brnycmtyor88 hydrocephalus is when there is too much water/fluid inside the skull and causes pressure. this happens to be a skull formation that is half as thick as ours, has higher levels of carbon and oxygen and lower levels of phosphorous. our skulls have higher phos levels and pretty low oxygen and carbon.
Yes very interesting. There is conclusive evidence conducted by real live research scientists that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Star Child did not have a human father. That is very interesting indeed! So it is either all alien, or partly alien, or partly or all some unidentified species to date from earth. Very interesting. Thanks for posting this very interesting scientific article on the Star Child.
Theres some conflicting information out there about this, the one you lean toward seems to favor "alien-hybrid". The other explanation leans towards the "realist" perspective, based on what Ive seen, DNA results showed "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes". But believe me, I wish it was alien.
Is there some incredibly important reason why the 'scientific' YouTubers can't do their homework...like actually look at the research done on the starchild? Why do I have to answer to dumb ass comments from dumb ass YouTubers talking about gene variations causing differences in twins? Let's talk about the Star Child, hey gee, what a concept, after all, that is the topic.
@c1zx How do you know if "research" is being done on this skull? You have no idea and you can only read the personal website of the guy who is trying to flog books. You know nothing about science or research. If you did, you would be among the entire scientific community that thinks this stuff is a joke. What do you know about DNA analysis? Tell me how it is that Pye can conclude that the father was an "alien", yet as he claims, the testing is not yet complete? Come on man, get the degrees.
@777blueblood If I were "dyslexic", I wouldn't communicate in sentences that were coherent. Do you understand the term, "dyslexic"? Digressions aside, the are NO videos anywhere that support the assertion that this skull is non-human. More to the point, there is NO EVIDENCE to support that this skull is non-human. Let's forget the video issue and stick to that as the narrative.
@c1zx I am sorry, but the website that you refer to is not one of science. If you are interested in science, refer to scientific journals that undergo the scrutiny of peer-review. If you wish however, to follow the whacko world of pseudoscience, then fill your boots. The World of Woo-Woo loves new disciples.
@c1zx Given the natural variability in terms of the actual base-pairs in the human genome, estimated to be approx. 0.01%, and that the number of base pairs is estimated to be 3billion, then how is it possible that Pye has already concluded, before his alleged analysis is complete, that with his report of alleged differences of less than 50,000 base pairs, that this is anywhere near the 30million required to conclude that this is non-human?
@777blueblood You must be kidding to think that You Tube is anything but a simple collection of videos. There is nothing scientific about the quality of these videos and this is not YT's mandate. It is not a science-based website. That you think otherwise and use it to support a position demonstrates that you really do not have any education. Obviously any retard can post.
@777blueblood I never said that YT might have videos that are posted with scientific merit. What I DID say was that YT is not the place where anyone who knows anything about research, looking for credible scientific information, comes to find it. There is absolutely no assurance that anything posted is more than time wasters. In other words, how do you know (yes, YOU) if what you find on YT is valid or not? You don't have any education in science at the level required, DO YOU?
timmeee
veganbond 1 day ago
It's clearly a defect. Poor little blighter didn't develop properly, it happens more than we like to think.
adriannicus 2 weeks ago
it's the skull of a retard, there was a kid in school with a big head we use to call him big head.
otisdriftwoodbaby 1 month ago
All this alien stuff would be a lot more believable if those who keep making up this stuff would give the aliens limitations an inferiority. You can say they're smarter, and I may be able to believe you (If we didn't have dark ages all the time, we'd be that advanced) but when you start saying that even their bones are more advanced; that's when I start to call shenanigans.
Can't someone make up alien stories where the aliens Aren't better in every single way?
ryelor123 1 month ago
oh, now I understand what the bible was complaining about.Lets see, you have men from outer space (angels) mating with woman on earth. Didn't that all end with a failed extinction event?
ryelor123 1 month ago
Wow ^___^ That is a crazy skull huh... That would be one ugly human as far as looks :/ Probably very smart and strong bones in other places... These people commenting are ignoring the thickness of the skull and how amazing that is. It basically meant this person must have had very strong bones.
jegej18 1 month ago
Line it up with mine....
jegej18 1 month ago
birth effects, dumbasses
mattthecow1 2 months ago
i believe it's called "physical retardation"
Noise509 2 months ago
I also love how in the line up of skulls all the other ones are perfect representations of a human skull. Line it up with skulls from twins joined at the head or other deformed skulls see which ones seem more alien.
BrootalMetalBanjo 2 months ago
obviously not an alien. You do realize that a whole lot of crazy deformities can occur in development. There are countless people born with 2 faces, bones missing, bones grown where they where not supposed to grow. We don't really know the causes, but obviously this "star child" is a rare unique deformity.
As for this DNA evidence, if it were true people would know about it and SETI would be going nuts but as of now in the real world there is no evidence of aliens
BrootalMetalBanjo 2 months ago
the skull shows signs of deformation, what we have here is a sign of radiation back then. travel safe with this information you just took the blue pill if you know what i mean, no alien to bad
BRIANGOODSP33D 2 months ago
the skull belonged to someone who had a condition called, "Treacher Collins syndrome" Google it.
xtormented 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A simple internet search yields that this was in fact a small child with human dna/chromosomes and died of congenital hydrocephalus. Man's imagination knows no bounds!
tegan71969 2 months ago
''Starchild'' suffered from a congenital defect, specifically Brachycephaly and exorbitism. The evidence supports the fact that the ''Starchild'' was not an alien, as it suffered from various human congenital defects that are known and well documented.
Pye is a charlatan. History is replete with snake-oil salesmen trying to ply their wares on the uneducated and gullible and this is no different.
philyB08 2 months ago
in the future, embrionic stem cell could complete this ahm...being
24hoffline 2 months ago
Has anyone seen Johnny?
pretending2Bhuman 2 months ago
or maby it is cousins having sex and creating a fucked up mutated child.
903harman 3 months ago
@903harman haha!!! that was my first thought too!!
PorcelainBackbones 3 months ago
When some stars explode, they send star dust shooting throughout the univers. When this dust contaminates other planests. The building blocks of life are then created. We are literaly all star children. Living in the golden age for life in this univers. Sometimes it's important to remember where you came from. So you appreciate what you've been given here. Because it's not always going to be this way. Some day, the univers will be dark again. Be thankful you're here now.
ortausti 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this alien looks like he has downsyndrome
Seigu007 3 months ago
we are all hybrids. there is no logic possibility that any type of extra terrestrial would be in any way similar to us if we were not some how related to them
inthe48states 4 months ago
ppoyd lye
veganbond 3 months ago
Its AvP all ovr again!
GibbyHunter 4 months ago
The Starchild has no expansion of its foramen magnum, there is a "crease" along the rear of its sagittal suture, and a CAT scan showed the suture itself was not fused. Therefore, the Starchild can't possibly have been hydro cephalic.
That is cute man.. All that time and money we have invested with Lloyd.. and we are con artists.. You guys need to get a grip.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 I know for a fact you are full of shit. First hand. So spread your filth elsewhere. I have worked with the starchild skull hands on and can tell you it is most certainly not fully of this world.There are fibers woven into the bone, the brain capacity is almost twice that of a human skull. Please stop taking like you are informed, because you most certainly are NOT. Let me guess you also know for a fact that we have not been visited by EBE's. 3 words disclosure project interviews.
monstermash2011 5 months ago
@monstermash2011 Wait whaaaat? Hold on... I support the hybrid theory!! Read all my comments man lol. Lloyd is one of my lifelong colleagues! We don't meet much in person anymore, but I can PM you our emails if you would like.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Many people on here said that this skull was just Human. and was in fact just a very bad case of Hydrocephalus, I proved to them that it was not.
me- "The Starchild has no expansion of its foramen magnum, there is a "crease" along the rear of its sagittal suture, and a CAT scan showed the suture itself was not fused. Therefore, the Starchild can't possibly have been hydro cephalic."
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
ha ha "The earth is flat" ha ha "the sun revolves around us" ha ha "we are at the center of the galaxy" ha ha "pandas are just mystical creatures" ha ha "bigfoots dont exist.. because where are their bones?!"
I am going to stop on that one lol because its funny they said this..
Because there is not one single fossilized bone of a chimpanzee in the world today.. SO THEY DONT EXIST? so absurd.. They live in whats called the lower montane jungles.. a classification that humans inhabit 1% of.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
Has anyone compared this skull, with the skull of a Progeria child?
eeektavius 5 months ago
@eeektavius
It has been proven that this was nothing more then a human suffering from Hydrocephalus.
But progeria was a good guess i must say!
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
sorry but this is not alien / hybrid because if it was dont you think that the skull and pye would have been disappeared by now by the powers that be,this is what were all told by all the conspiracy nuts, if this was truly the smoking gun then dont you think that we would never have heard about it. At its best its a distraction to keep people from the real truth.
MACCAox 5 months ago
Want to know what this skull REALLY is? Do an online search on Treacher Collins Syndrome, photos.
Alien? LOL!
ChuckWillsWidows 5 months ago
awwwww the baby at the end but wtf is that starchild thing?
RtheoneTolbert 5 months ago
looks like an alien gray skull to me.
i think it's funny when ppl say "you are wrong and then reply: no you are wrong" and so on and so on, have u ever stopped and thought maybe you're both wrong?
ppl believe in things way to easily and become stupid. read, learn as much as you can and then look deep into it, and make sure the source is not of some untrustworthy site like some cover-up story that most ppl fall for and then think they know everything. there are plenty of fake truthers out there
TheEXpothead 5 months ago
We are all aliens, we are all from somewhere else.. our leaders are reptilian hybrids posing as full humans they are not!
We have 12 other alien races in our DNA.
Humans on earth are a genetic experiment. No other races have these combinations of genes. It doesnt appear to be working !
There is inner conflict between our reptilian /mammalian DNA, which then expands and reflects into the external, outer world., causing war and destruction.
SovereignBeing 5 months ago
theness.com/index.php/the-starchild-project/
ACapillary 5 months ago
Hydrocephalus
ACapillary 5 months ago
I think it could be a skull with hydrocephaly and a slight bit of Holoprosencephaly
Akirameerkat 6 months ago
@Akirameerkat the skull has no sinuses what so ever. you can be the ugliest of uglies. You will still be born with some trace of sinuses. The Nuclear DNA was somewhat recovered. lets put it this way. we are 60% similar to rats. We are less than 40% similar to the starchild. as far as the father.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 people with Holoprosencephaly doesn't have nasal cavities or a nose period. look it u, and look up the dupuytren and mutter, and you will see stranger deformities then the star child.
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@Akirameerkat ... these people also have HUMAN dna. The starchild's DNA profile reveals a human mother and a complete UNKNOWN as the father, not found in any known database. Human deformities have human dna profiles.
kensmind 5 months ago
@Akirameerkat people with holoprosencephaly are 99% genetically similar to us.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 I know that
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@Akirameerkat ok.. and the nuclear DNA that we finally saved up to process and examine...
was almost less than 40% putting the similarity 20% below rats. Please my friend, fight for truth, so love may venture, and peace may follow... (search "everything you know is wrong lloyd pye") please I humbly request that you please do this, If anyone here is a truth seeker, I believe it is in your best interest to take notes or at least watch the presentation for a half-hour.
Peace and Light.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 are you talking about his belief that humans were created by aliens, which there is no evidence for, the skull is an anomaly but it is not from another world, as if there are aliens, which there probably are all across the universe, they have probably evolved completely different from us, and wouldn't resemble our biological appearance at all, they would probably also have a different carbon molecule then DNA for there anatomy.
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@Akirameerkat oh but there is evidence my friend. you lock yourself on the other side =[
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 one abnormal skull is not evidence, Lloyd pye isn't credible, his skull is circumstantial at best, if I heard a real biologist or other scientist show evidence then I would agree.
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@Akirameerkat IT IS NOT ABNORMAL. it is PERFECT. sorry =[ Modern Science has one tiny flaw, that something cannot be true without terrestrial evidence. not to bully, but have you even seen at least an hour's worth of starchild material?
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 its abnormal because its not a regular shaped human skull, I have watched some of the videos about it, only evidence tells the truth, but the evidence of this skull is circumstantial, as it doesn't provide definitive proof of any alien species visiting earth, because there are plenty of skulls like it of children born with Hydrocephaly, there is a Hydrocephalus skeleton in Brazil that they call starchild 2. if there was say, a piece of alien technology found with it, --
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@Akirameerkat It is not "abnormal" it is way to symmetrical. and it is completely redesigned.
and do I have to remind you that people with hydrocephalus are 99% genetically similar to us?
and the Nuclear DNA that was just recovered was like less than 40%?
the Y chromosome, or the father, was not from this planet.
In the end. It is Optimism. Namaste...
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 they have no proof that the Y chromosome is not from earth, the chances that aliens look like us and Have DNA is one in a google. Its not redesigned its deformed, it is not an alien hybrid, its more likely the love child of a woman and another animal then an alien hybrid. watch the program, "Origins, where are the aliens" with Niel De-grass Tyson., and then maybe you will understand why this is not an alien hybrid.
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333
Where did you hear this bs about it beeing less then 40% meaning its an alien?
Humans have more then 40% similarity with worms because the (example) GENE for HEAD ect is the same in all living organism.
First of all "Dna is not everlasting" so over time there will be some parts damaged.
And the bs you are refering to is from UFO optimist websites who don't mind lies.
And when Dna is encounterd that is very diffrent from ours it doesent mean its an alien....
It means its a lie.
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
@TheGoatherdGod Preliminary DNA testing has revealed the Nuclear Y chromosome in the DNA, or the material passed down from the father that we got something going on.. the health database had "no similarities found" in nice blue bold... This stupid drumbeat and the picture of the skull... You guys think I waste my time.. Excuse me while I continue being all Indiana Jones, while you guys stand back, and troll. Wow what boring lives.. I criticize because its apparent how dark you all wish to be
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333
No the owner "claim" he got a phone call with the preliminary DNA test result beeing like that, and when the DNA test was done it proved to be a human child with Hydrocephalus.
You are merely falling for the hoax of a con artist who wanna make some cash! very much Indiana Jones indeed LMAO.
And in doing so you are insulting every human beeing who have ever sufferd from Hydrocephalus!
When a person tries to pull a confidence trick on you, you better check some real sources.
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
@TheGoatherdGod The geneticist working on the Starchild Skull discovered that its mtDNA (the part of DNA passed only through the maternal line) was radically different from human DNA. The maximum number of mtDNA differences between all humans is 120. The Starchild Skull has between 800-1,000. This is a partial result, but it is enough to be definitive: the Skull’s mtDNA is NOT HUMAN! Do I have to keep telling you people...people with Hydrocephalus are 99% similar to us.. Starchild is < 40%
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333
No the geneticist who worked on it found it was HUMAN, don't try to give me a lecture about DNA im a Biochemist and i do this kinda sh*t every day.
The first result will in all cases involving old bones give a fked up result and in the end a real one unless a fraud, i KNOW this. What you are saying is "trust the conartist not the expert"
Do i need to keep telling you people you are falling for the lies of a conartist trying to make cash?
The geneticist FOUND that it was a human!
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
>CONTINUE<
The guy who owns the skull wants to find an alien and he wont give up untill he managed making a whole lot of people believe he did.
WE ALL want to find one, there is no doubt that there is life somewhere else beyond this planet, but do not let this fraud fool you! Keep looking!
And.. The idea of a humanoid/alien crossbread is by all means preposterous in all means involving the star child.
And pretty much it is in all cases,Send me a private msg and i can explain without a word limit
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
@TheGoatherdGod Hydrocephalics have what is called "water on the brain," but it's actually spinal fluid that can't drain out properly. When you are born with that problem, your head blows up like a balloon, so the pressure is uniform in all directions, with no direction favored over another. Also, in untreated infants, the pressure is constant until part of the cerebellum (a part of the brain) is squeezed out of the foramen magnum opening where the spine enters the skull, and death occurs.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333
Yeah thanks for that one
Are you trying to say this would make it impossible to be a case of Hydrocephalus?
Just to not make you too sad... in some cases even animals live a couple of years in nature with Hydrocephalus.
If what you are trying to say is that all Hydrocephalus cases means certaind death during infancy unless threated you are very wrong.
There are many cases of people who live/lived with in long with merely no threatment at all.
And this starchild died as a "child"
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
The starchild did not die as a child. it had its wisdoms..Errors or not, we can be supremely confident that the confirmed total of the Starchild’s differences will fall between 800 and 1000 bp, while all humans are 120 or less. Using the most effective techniques science can bring to bear to solve any problem of genetic heritage, techniques that are used with finality in court cases worldwide, the Starchild is shown to be nowhere near the ballpark of human or prehuman. This result is definitive.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333
Thats just a claim by a wacko dude who wanna makes cash and be famous for owning a head of a dead kid who sufferd from Hydrocephalus.
Go check a Source who is NOT his for the REAL information.
Ask yourself for 1 minute... what would sciencetists/goverment or whatever you are paranoid about, have to gain from covering this up, why would they?
And ask yourself again what would the owner of the skull have to gain from making up this whole story when he already knows he is wrong?
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
@TheGoatherdGod YOU DON'T SEE STARCHILD BUMPER STICKERS OR COFFEE MUGS OR WALL POSTERS OR HALLOWEEN MASKS OR MARDI GRAS MASKS, OR CHILDREN'S PAJAMAS, ALL OF WHICH WERE POSSIBLE WITH THE MONEY THEY WERE SAVING FOR THE DNA TEST. THEY HAVE ALL PLAYED IT STRAIGHT AND IN EVERY CASE TRIED TO DO THE RIGHT THING WITH IT, AND THAT, MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE, IS WHAT WILL MAKE THEIR MONEY AND MAKE THEM FAMOUS WHEN THEY RECOVER THE STARCHILD'S ENTIRE GENOME AND ARE FREE TO ANNOUNCE IT TO THE WORLD.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheGoatherdGod Check your messages to receive the rest of your embarrassment.
TRUTHSEEKERS... WE WILL WIN... ITS THEIR WORD AGAINST THEIRS....
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333
Wow that msg was.. oohh wow you changed my entire life, you proved to me that there really is no point in even trying to make you face reality.
I really do feel sorry for you man...
You have all the answers right in front of you judging from your Private message... but it just seems to avoid you somehow O.O
How? why?
Ohh thats right, you are either plain dumb or you are the wack job the guy who holds the skull is looking for!
Join him! send him your cash for further dna testing
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
@TheGoatherdGod Feel sorry for me? Why. What do I lose out of proving to you Aliens exist.
What is reality, in your point of view?
I have sent him cash, and I will monthly.. send him what I can. Because he is legit. You are just too busy grinding a heavenly worn axe, locked in the godforsaken void that almost consumed me before my adult years. You go ahead and join hands with Creationism and Darwinism, tape your eyes shut, and walk down the path together, and have exciting, blissful lives.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333
you do not need to prove anything when it comes to the existance of aliens as there are no way to disprove it.
That alien life forms exist is obvious and there are searches for them, BUT the moonchild skull is not that of an alien or alien hybrid
That is the point, you are beeing fooled you miss the chance of making or beeing part of actual findings when you waste your time and MONEY on a hoax
This man is horrible because he abuses ur wish for his profit, you are his victim.....
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
@TheGoatherdGod I email this guy back and forth everyday. I know what he does with his money. I am not anyone's victim, besides that of my Government. He brings raw facts, you CHOOSE not to see them.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
Comment removed
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 I would hate to repeat myself, but you can be born without a nose. but sinuses? give me a break. Also we might appear to be kissing cousins to apes. what is it like 95% similar? we are intrinsic to rats by a factor of what like 60%? So what mammal has under 60%? I dont know but.. for a skull to be less than 40% intrinsic than its grave planet.. What do you say? Nature can do anything? Wake up! Fight the STUPIDS!!!
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
Respond to this video... and the starchild has no deformities. Its perfectly symmetrical.
TheHeretic333 5 months ago
@TheHeretic333 --like a ben ten omnitrix, lol, but seriously, if Aliens did visit earth, and did genetic experiments, then why is this the only skull that exists that seems to show that, there should be dozens all over the place, also, why did they do it once and leave? personally I think Llyod pye developed his theory after watching the episode of johnny quest called Moai mystery, where a Moai alien takes a primitive ape and uses an evolution ray making him into a modern human.
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@Akirameerkat if that were the case, it would have fully human dna. The starchild does not.
kensmind 5 months ago
@kensmind how do they know that the DNA is not fully human ? are they so sure, there must be public verifiable evidence for this to be credible.
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@Akirameerkat read the full description under the video. The mitochondrial dna WAS recoverable and datable to 900 or so years in age, the nuclear was NOT. That in and of itself is telling. It should show up in a database. It did not. This would be something to be expected if it was millions of years old, no way though in such a recent skull.
kensmind 5 months ago
@kensmind that does not mean its alien, it means its a strange anomaly, it should be researched and tested more, so it can be separated from things like the photoshop hoax of the giant skeletons, though I would like to hear what scientists like Neil Degrass Tyson, and Michio Kaku, Steven Hawking would say about it, as I have never seen this skull on any scientific programs, but only hear on youtube, I do believe that their probability is high that alien beings exist,---
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@kensmind--due to the size of the Universe, the number of exo-planets, stars, Galaxies, that there are, but Its highly improbable that any have visited earth, actually able to find our tiny world in the boondocks milky way, travel that thousands of light years just to make a hybrid child that doesn't even survive and then leave without a trace, leaving this odd skull for us to find and debate about.
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
@kensmind I am looking at another video on it, that talks about a 2010 DNA test on it, study of the teeth, show that it wasn't actually a child, but an adult when it died, there are many strange things about this skull, just because it doesn't have all Human DNA, we should not jump the conclusion that it is Alien right away.
Akirameerkat 5 months ago
i like the part with the weird skull.
soniceardeath 6 months ago
Wintersun :D
JorisKanters 6 months ago
Look E.T
MrIeathobos 6 months ago
Right, Lets grab a skull from a kid that had a genetic deformation like many kids today, and assume its some fucking alien hybrid breed bullshit. God damn humans can be so fucking dumb sometimes.
sacr3 6 months ago
If they cant impregnate an ape with human material. What would make our genetics so compatible with a bing from another planet? its absolutely impossible. Your stupid for believing this
VikingVern7 6 months ago
@VikingVern7 I don't believe this shit whatsoever, but an Alien species capable of traveling light years in a efficient time frame will most definitely have the ability to mix species. But again, this is all bullshit. Can't believe some people
sacr3 6 months ago
@sacr3 LOL tell me about it:)
Nekhet 5 months ago
Where are it's teeth?
Blakeyboii99 6 months ago
their not adding up the acts the right way! their comparing the alien like skull of a child with a skull of a full grown human! if this is going to work right then they need to do it like this. say that the skull is 900 years old but what ever it was, died at the age of 9 years old. you have to then compare it with a skull of today that belongs to a 9 year old human to know for sure if it is an alien skull or not. adult and child skulls look different because their both different ages.
codeman7055 7 months ago
Looks to me a kid got smashed in the face, it survived and lived for some time with a weird face. I wonder if people laughed at him, or cried for him.
SunnyGOES 7 months ago
Its highly unlikely that this is some ET hybrid. my previous comments explain the science behind it.
jimbobbass 7 months ago
@jimbobbass No need to, ask the X chromosome and Y chromosome who is this "alien".
They answer "Homo-Sapien".
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 7 months ago
It's a developmental defect resulting in some hideous baby fated to die within hours, Or a set of twins joined at the head also destined to die within hours. Either way it's still human, and not other worldly. Read a fucking text book before posting idiotic videos about aliens.
BrootalMetalBanjo 7 months ago
@BrootalMetalBanjo You ALSO are wrong. Teeth were also recovered along with the skull showing it to be an adult very advanced in age. It was not a child at the time of its death. Next time YOU post idiotic info you should do your homework.
kensmind 7 months ago 12
@kensmind Exactly what I was gonna say. They determined that this was an adult skull and not a child who could've possibly of died at a very early age due to its deformity. This person managed to live a long enough life.
DanielJoseDiego 7 months ago
@kensmind And there can´t exist small adult humans??
Nekhet 5 months ago
@Nekhet ... small adult humans have HUMAN dna. The starchild skull's mitochondrial and nuclear dna profile reveal a human mother and a complete UNKNOWN as the father, not falling into any known database.
kensmind 5 months ago
@BrootalMetalBanjo fucking retard..
adminoperator 4 months ago
Clone me and transfer my good memories and whatever wisdom I may have into the clone. Thats the ticket to immortality, might want some enhancement like two hearts and a better liver. The ability to through a 105 mph fast ball for 9 innings would be nice too. LOL
terrybrookman 7 months ago
@terrybrookman two hearts what are you doctor who?
pieman173 7 months ago
Why is everyone so surprise at this? There is so much proof of another species or up graded humans on this planet I find it hard for people not to believe it. Two examples are the fact that a bunch of people could not cut a thousand ton monolith of granite with stone or copper tools out of a mountain and haul it up a mountain and raise it with plant fiber ropes. Or the nickle steel column over 40 feet long found in India in 1700's we could not produce that until the late 1800's.
terrybrookman 7 months ago
Why is everyone so surprise at this? There is so much proof of another species or up graded humans on this planet I find it hard for people not to believe it. Two example is the fact that a bunch of people could not cut a thousand ton monolith of granite with stone or copper tools out of a mountain and haul it up a mountain and raise it with plant fiber ropes. Or the Nicole steel column over 40 feet long found in India in 1700's we could not produce that until the late 1800's.
terrybrookman 7 months ago
5) Hard to give a full explanation on why they didnt get a match with the second piece of DNA but in the footage a 232 length sequence is used first and then a 342 sequence used. I'm unsure why they would have queried two differing lengths.
6) Contamination, test error, artefact or possibly even a section of DNA linked to the possible disease are all potential reasons why they couldn't get a match.
He is chatting shit and funnily enough the word "money" comes up at the end
jimbobbass 7 months ago in playlist Lloyd Pye - Starchild skull, hominoids, origins of humans
I'm surprised by the possibility out of two they got one section of sequence from the mitochondria.
4) I tried to identify the sequnce they got that they called human but the # doesnt match up to anything. I strongly suspect that it is from the nucleus. This would completely discount his idea about using a human egg for the mitochonfira only.
jimbobbass 7 months ago in playlist Lloyd Pye - Starchild skull, hominoids, origins of humans
3) Mitochondrial DNA is comprised of 13 genes in humans (I think, if not it is a very small number in comparison to the nuclear DNA; in excess of 20,000). I would assume the DNA extraction method may have excluded the mitochondrial DNA because you tend to centrifuge and fractionate your samples and the nucleus comes out in a different fraction to the mitochondria. Even if the sample was perfect and all DNA (nuclear and mitochondrial) was present during the test, I'm surprised
jimbobbass 7 months ago in playlist Lloyd Pye - Starchild skull, hominoids, origins of humans
2) First example is that shotgun DNA sequencing should have generated more sections of DNA; rather than just two sequences. I'd like to know the full results of this as I suspect he has omitted more sequences and these are in fact human.
jimbobbass 7 months ago in playlist Lloyd Pye - Starchild skull, hominoids, origins of humans
Very high probability of bs....
I'm pretty sure the consensus on this one was that the kid suffered some sort of developmental disease. Although I don't know which actual disease, but I don't think it is hard to imagine such a disease.
Here is why I think there are problems with his line of thinking:
1) There seems to be a lot of missing information and misleading ideas.
jimbobbass 7 months ago in playlist Lloyd Pye - Starchild skull, hominoids, origins of humans
these skulls are asians
sourmanofcoal 8 months ago
this looks like a Hydrocephalic
Akira89M 8 months ago
Why don't we clone this shit?
kousoulides 8 months ago
You guys are not keeping up on this. Mr. Pye has had several tests done on this skull, including DNA, and it is not coming up as anything known to this earth.
leahsodyssey123 8 months ago
This isn't some crazy alien hybrid skull, you guys are just bat-shit crazy. This was proven to be a child from 3-5 years with a physical deformity...The list of diseases and defects that can do this is extensive. This is just a messed up kid..
Lawlzilla 8 months ago
Comment removed
OfficialLIoydPye 8 months ago
*facepalm*
Lawlzilla 8 months ago
go to the Huntarian museum in London and you'll see things a milion times more bizare than this... The DNA thing is a bit of a mystery but the shape is quite like a hydrocephalic skull.
biglimpnotoe 9 months ago
im a achristian and all but i think he just deformed from his mother being "old" and have a baby with downsyndrom or another disease like it that we don't know of today!
GenuineLarry 9 months ago
@GenuineLarry Please read the top rated comment. Even if it was deformed by some defect it would still show up 100% human in a dna test. This showed up as 40% human 60% unknown.
SwrodMstrShadowShock 8 months ago
chernobyl skull
DarkEvilKyo 9 months ago
Clone it and see what happens, that`s what a scientist with testicles of steel would do.
shadowtiger18 9 months ago
Hidrocefalia. And is -unfortunately- as common as horrible.
DrErkencho 9 months ago
I would love to see a professional facial reconstruction artist do up a clay-face of this skull. The artist renditions in the video strike me as stylized, and I have no way to determine if they have any scientific backing behind them.
theblackened14 9 months ago
I am disappointed this has nothing to do with Wintersun
jaykos666 9 months ago
Haha yeah it's an elite general! :D
sirkyboy 10 months ago
its an elite skull from halo:o
heyy2197 10 months ago
1:42 a cabbage patch kid from outerspace! Run. In the future, they will dig up Roy Dennis' (Rocky) Look him up. He died in 1982 from elephantitis . They will think he was from another galaxy. This was just a malformation.
gunniesack 10 months ago
Skull of a child with birth defects, it's obvious
BrootalMetalBanjo 10 months ago
Dumb asses. Its looks like an animal, its probably just an extinct animal.
HongKongBoyz100 10 months ago
even if this is a genetic defect the genes would be identified. i.e. someone with an enlarged skull would still be identified as 100% human dna. same with every other known species. deformities dont affect species identification or dna identification. so the fact that 60% of the genes in the skull are not identified with any known species on earth is alarming.
MrEk24 10 months ago 37
@MrEk24 Pathetic that you are trying to suggest that 60% that was not recoverable from degradation is evidence that they were "not identified with any known species". You are intentionally confounding the concepts of identifying, with recovering. To simply say its unidentifiable is misleading if it was never recovered. DNA from old skulls is often unrecoverable. Enough of the DNA exists to know Its mother & father were HUMAN and it belonged to Haplogroup C (common in Native Americans)
frankensteinmoneymac 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrEk24 WHAT? ARE? YOU? TALKING? ABOUT? THIS IS SIMPLY A LIE.
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 7 months ago
I'd be very interested to see a reconstruction of the face... I know we can do it with regular human skulls to see what they may have looked like, so why not this one?
ElementAir83 10 months ago
nice, taking a simple deformation and making a big deal of it.
alexhong100 10 months ago
interesting...found in Bible...look genesis...also there are other documentaries in HistoryTV,
SuperRVTraveler 10 months ago
great vid
johnnytheprick 10 months ago
bullshit child.
jimmycheong1417 10 months ago
some type, a mouth, and probably had two arms and two legs as well. So when some of the DNA does appear to be human did it never occur that of course it should. It's when there are sections that don't match with anything in our database that cause concearn. BTW for you non believers, defects don't appear as unidentified genes, those would appear as defects, just like we have in our own genes.
itsthetooth 10 months ago
Well its funny you say there are no videos saying its not human. I dunno why some people are taking the DNA results as such, including myself. Perhaps because there are some DNA sections that appear human, and some that they know aren't. I guess what it comes down to is non believers are attesting that if it were alien, there is no way it could ANY DNA that looks human at all. While believers are saying otherwise. Let me sum it up for all you that are confused. He has a head, with eyes of......
itsthetooth 10 months ago
Ridicuous
bertdanger 11 months ago
@jeremyburfield hj
jink400 11 months ago
Comment removed
teetofknowledge 11 months ago
the skull of tsim fucks
poopy910555 11 months ago
Ancient Encephali a nasty end for this poor creature..but not alien..
Theghostswithin 11 months ago
@Theghostswithin what do you mean?
betafreak39 11 months ago
@betafreak39 a disease most likely..either a form of elephantiasis or hydro-encephali..both can cause bone deformation and both are quite nasty..however it could also be an ancient attempt at head binding..but an interesting find none the less..some form of congenital issue..its quite amazing the poor thing lived as long as it did..hard to tell if adult or younger...either way I don't imagine this person had a very happy existence.
Theghostswithin 11 months ago
i mikheal jacksons reall head
COPZRWAK 11 months ago
DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD, a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes"
belisariusorb 11 months ago
@belisariusorb Well the question remains then why is it of a shape totally different to humman, there still needs to be an explantion
bloty02 11 months ago
@bloty02 Potential explanations for the skull's unusual features include the use of cradle boarding on a hydrocephalic child, brachycephaly and Crouzon syndrome.
Took me 30 seconds to find that on Wikipedia, less time than it takes to post this note
belisariusorb 11 months ago
@belisariusorb yes,, seems much more logical than jumping to the coclusion that it came from another planet which most people seem to do. I agree with you, you can't expect me to find it on wikipedia within 30 seconds though,,lol.
bloty02 11 months ago
@bloty02 Just by understanding the concept of relative probabilities (congenital disease likely, alien skull in a cave unlikely) puts you way ahead of the ufo-heads who want to see something alien and won't let logic get in the way. Cheers.
belisariusorb 11 months ago
@belisariusorb You are a MORON. Your quick glib answer does NOT address the issues of the father's nuclear DNA, which does not appear to be human at all. All known deformities have already been tested for and this is none of them.
kensmind 7 months ago
Ever see someone with progeria? They're skulls look like this
carebonez 1 year ago
sdrhxdfbfbgfbdfbzsdrgsegsdfgsdfgsdfgsdfg
MyDezarae123 1 year ago
soooooooooooo wierd
MyDezarae123 1 year ago
omqq dis video izz sooooo crazii i never seen a skull lyk dat
MyDezarae123 1 year ago
@MyDezarae123 stop typing ghetto faggot
skatehardcorex 1 year ago
if only they could just straight up test the dna of the bone
joemcbobinite 1 year ago
@joemcbobinite and i mean like put it into a computer and then the computer breaks it down and finds matches, obviously if there is none itd be alien.to find out where it came from wed obviously need a computer that has data on all lifeforms everywhere and we dont since we havent collected from "everywhere" i kinda wanna know if it had telekinesis lol.
joemcbobinite 1 year ago
I think this is a condition called hydrocephalus.
brnycmtyor88 1 year ago
@brnycmtyor88 hydrocephalus is when there is too much water/fluid inside the skull and causes pressure. this happens to be a skull formation that is half as thick as ours, has higher levels of carbon and oxygen and lower levels of phosphorous. our skulls have higher phos levels and pretty low oxygen and carbon.
joemcbobinite 1 year ago
kinda dumb either a kid was born all messed up or just got shit kicked
islandoffroadracing 1 year ago
You know... it's broken...?
sharma19143 1 year ago
aint this evidence of us not been alone?
rawdenashitey 1 year ago
@rawdenashitey It aint not evidence of us not been not alone
onthecraic 1 year ago
@ifartwell yes, I think this is very interesting :)
c1zx 1 year ago
Yes very interesting. There is conclusive evidence conducted by real live research scientists that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Star Child did not have a human father. That is very interesting indeed! So it is either all alien, or partly alien, or partly or all some unidentified species to date from earth. Very interesting. Thanks for posting this very interesting scientific article on the Star Child.
c1zx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Theres some conflicting information out there about this, the one you lean toward seems to favor "alien-hybrid". The other explanation leans towards the "realist" perspective, based on what Ive seen, DNA results showed "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes". But believe me, I wish it was alien.
ColorOfTought 1 year ago
Is there some incredibly important reason why the 'scientific' YouTubers can't do their homework...like actually look at the research done on the starchild? Why do I have to answer to dumb ass comments from dumb ass YouTubers talking about gene variations causing differences in twins? Let's talk about the Star Child, hey gee, what a concept, after all, that is the topic.
c1zx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@c1zx How do you know if "research" is being done on this skull? You have no idea and you can only read the personal website of the guy who is trying to flog books. You know nothing about science or research. If you did, you would be among the entire scientific community that thinks this stuff is a joke. What do you know about DNA analysis? Tell me how it is that Pye can conclude that the father was an "alien", yet as he claims, the testing is not yet complete? Come on man, get the degrees.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@c1zx Perhaps you simply don't know what you are talking about? Probably closer to the truth.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@777blueblood If I were "dyslexic", I wouldn't communicate in sentences that were coherent. Do you understand the term, "dyslexic"? Digressions aside, the are NO videos anywhere that support the assertion that this skull is non-human. More to the point, there is NO EVIDENCE to support that this skull is non-human. Let's forget the video issue and stick to that as the narrative.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@c1zx I am sorry, but the website that you refer to is not one of science. If you are interested in science, refer to scientific journals that undergo the scrutiny of peer-review. If you wish however, to follow the whacko world of pseudoscience, then fill your boots. The World of Woo-Woo loves new disciples.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@c1zx Given the natural variability in terms of the actual base-pairs in the human genome, estimated to be approx. 0.01%, and that the number of base pairs is estimated to be 3billion, then how is it possible that Pye has already concluded, before his alleged analysis is complete, that with his report of alleged differences of less than 50,000 base pairs, that this is anywhere near the 30million required to conclude that this is non-human?
Explain this as science please.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@777blueblood You must be kidding to think that You Tube is anything but a simple collection of videos. There is nothing scientific about the quality of these videos and this is not YT's mandate. It is not a science-based website. That you think otherwise and use it to support a position demonstrates that you really do not have any education. Obviously any retard can post.
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@777blueblood I never said that YT might have videos that are posted with scientific merit. What I DID say was that YT is not the place where anyone who knows anything about research, looking for credible scientific information, comes to find it. There is absolutely no assurance that anything posted is more than time wasters. In other words, how do you know (yes, YOU) if what you find on YT is valid or not? You don't have any education in science at the level required, DO YOU?
TheSkepticUn 1 year ago