Refuting Ammar Nakshawani's Story of Junayd Baghdadi (ra)

[gassan1987]

You stated Imam Muhammad Al-Taqi's (9th) era is 811-835 CE. Imam Ali Al-Hadi's(10th) era is 827868 CE.  Behlools era is 720-835 CE. Junayd Al-Baghdadi 830-910 CE. NO CONTRADICTION! There is FIVE years where all FOUR of them are ALIVE. Pathetic attempt and btw Ammar is a historian in Islamic History, as a Muslim i would check my information in books before publishing a refutation like this that has no basis.

[DefendDeen]

Now you are fabricating more information. If we go by your aql which you don't have, it would mean Behlol (ra) debated with a 5 year old boy. Secondly, I said era. This does not mean Behlol (ra) lived till 835CE.

[gassan1987]

Regardless of the era doesnt make difference, your point is that the 10th Imam was not around and he was hence could of been up 7 years old. Furthermore these dates arent always accurate, in addition its not a suprise that an Imam would debate at a young age, thats a totally different topic. However what strikes me the most out of this is the way you instantly say we have no aql. This is the manners you have learnt from Islam, from the Prophet (saww). Ammar isnt infallible btw.

[DefendDeen]

The reason I said that is because you are trying to prove that Behlol (ra) lived in the era of Junayd Baghdadi (ra). You proofs are based on emotions not rational. Either you come up with a logical argument or don't waste my time. Bring some proof from textual sources.

[DefendDeen]

However, Behlool (ra) did not live during that era. Where is your aql ?

[bagila]

10th live din time of 9