Added: 5 years ago
From: 9112667747229
Views: 16,594
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its begins falling at 0:08.if the free fall theory is correct,the entire building should be done 9.22 sec later, collapsing at around 0:17-0:18...this is not what happens.The free fall theory is incorrect.The video evidence affirms it.

  • Why does it matter? Can't we just remember the tragedy and think of the people that lost family members,not worry about exactly what happened

  • that looked AWSOME. too bad people were still in it when it fell

  • So.... how is it even debatable that, even if the steel was weakened, it is physically impossible for the building to be absolutely demolished from top to bottom in fewer than ten seconds due to a GRAVITATIONAL collapse. The downward force required is not possible to destroy all 90-100 floors below just from gravity...Pulverized into dust from top to bottom, perfect symmetry.... The government is lying, whether we like it or not. And there is VERIFIED CHEMICAL EVIDENCE OF THERMITE, HELLO

  • @bjdm3089 It would appear that you can't count, I would have thought this video would make it easier for you, it has a clock running on it! Less than 10 seconds, lol.

    Verified chemical evidence my ass, that has long been debunked, even recently, (and courageously) by another 'truther' scientist. Get with the times!

  • also, top down gravitational collapse is impossible is it?

    /watch?v=prwvj-npt5s

  • @TheFlyposter Lol.... there are cables initiating that collapse, not fires... And notice how in that video you can still desk and chairs... The vast majority in the twin tower was reduced to breathable DUST...

    My ten second estimation is definitely a little off but it's irrelevant... 90+ floors of untouched steel do not tear themselves apart.  They RESIST stronger than most materials, that's why they're chosen for large structures like this. But you will ignore the glaring evidence forever...

  • Unfortunately (for you) the maths has been done to show there was enough available potential energy in the buildings to destroy beyond recognition the office furniture and people within the building, however the thousands of photos released by NIST of ground zero show that the majority of the building was not turned to dust. I have no evidence to ignore, you have not presented any. Where are you calculations demonstrating the building could not destroy itself (clue: saying so will not suffice).

  • @bjdm3089 Also, there are no desks and chairs in the video I posted, buildings are emptied before a controlled demolition, go watch it again.

    "there are cables initiating that collapse, not fires"

    Doesn't matter what initiated the collapse, you can't shift the goal posts, as you claimed a top-down collapse is impossible, also that is not true about steel, especially where fire is present see:

    /watch?v=Drsgs6-3Qlg

  • Am I the only person who notices that part of the tower is still standing after it collapses? How could this be demolition?

  • @Daniel092004 Well spotted, the building largely collapsed around the core, showing it was not a CD. It's the core you can see still standing, however it was supported by the rest of the building, and without that, and with the damage sustained by the collapse, fell on it's own some 20-30 seconds later.

  • If I were old enough to know what the World Trade Center was (I was three) I would have probably been crying in front of my TV with CNN on

  • hahahahahahahaha

  • So the north tower was hit first and it was the second one to collapse and the South tower was hit second and the first one to go down. What a day. Thank You.

  • You know, I was talking with a counselor about this and I told her that as I was watching the towers fall, I was thinking of the people trapped inside. And I was thinking of the people who jumped from the top of the tower. Dear Jesus, save as many of those innocent lives as you can. Thank You.

  • You can look at sec 10 a Explosion why is there a Explosion ....

  • Thats not an explosion. The air being forced out of the building pushes the flames outward as well.

  • you should check out verinage a french demolition tech. I think it clearly shows how the official pancake theory is false if you know what to look for please use your own mind and dont let others tell you what is true or false.

  • So....Kind of like what you are doing right now?

  • @dapoedog You need to do some reading, although pancaking took place, that is not the official theory for the cause of the collapse, I recommend as a starting point for your reading: the NIST reports into the collapses.

  • what happen to the TV attena on the north tower with the tower came down

  • that is devistating

  • dude u are so not funny!

  • Where was this video taken?

  • That's Not Funny!!!!

  • youre sick

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more