americans are hilarious, the point this so called 'lawyer' was making wasnt even to a point, it was just to be over dramatic and see how she reacted. the american system is terrible for getting the truth.
the truth is - there was nowhere near enough evidence to imply she had any effect on the death of this child and doctors still know relatively very little about babies.
it was about punishing someone....and a foreigner just happened to be there - i wonder who could have done it? hmmmm
She's actually laughing because throughout the trial her lawyer would pull funny faces at the prosecution behind their backs to make her feel less intimidated during cross-examination.
She's a young girl FFS. She's not laughing because she's pure evil. It's a nervous laughter and a British thing.
If you ask me the whole thing was probably a mixture of both Matthew sustaining injuries on his skull from previous weeks (check the evidence) and Louise handling him in a less than delicate way - and she probably panicked when he stopped breathing.
She is not laughing, she is bemused by some of the trivial & quite patronising questioning that is all. And probably smiling nervously...not to be nasty and inappropriate.
Whenever something awful happens especially with children there has to be someone to blame, a scapegoat to make everyone else feel better that justice was done. If some of you lot were intelligent enough to read, you'd understand the facts on this case before you judge someone just for the sake of blaming the nearest person.
@Raylufc : example: in 2008 out of all the murderers in the usa (and their was plenty of them) only 37 were put to death. Out of these 37, most of them sat on death row for "years". 13 states don't even allow capital punishment in the USA....so its not like we are frying people righnt and left
They didn't have a case. Not according to the medical evidence. She was just a kid and she smiled on the stand because she's not a cold blooded killer. She's a kid and she was railroaded. Evil fucks.
mimine101, Her behavior during her testimony was extremely inappropriate. She was being asked questions about what happened to matthew and she was practically laughing.
she was guilty -she had only one goal in life -to have agood time(hence her coming to the US and her consistent late night gallivanting. She was not in a fit state each day to care kindly for that darling child. Again Woodward's day of punishment lies ahead!!!!
She was proven innocent. The Eappens knew they killed their own child. They didn't want to deal with parenting so they can make a wide load of extra money. Pure greed. They didn't want Louise to publish her book after her name was cleared. It would've proven them to be the real killers. They exploited her as a bad person and stopped when she was proven completely innocent. They know they would be in deep shit if they kept exploiting her. They made even more money on the shaken baby shirts.
Louise had a fair trial. She was found guilty because she let herself down on the stand - you just don't snigger in that situation - you imagine your family all dead around you if you have to - and - even so - the jury were convinced however wrong their verdict may have been. I think they wanted justice for the parents - but what justice? Convict an innocent?
we will never truly know what really happened....but Louise Woodward makes a very bad impression on the stand....that smirking and smiling thing did not help her at all.
To wickmay: Louise Woodward should have fryed in the electric chair, all these liberal/democrats all favored that she should serve a full life sentence
I believed she could be guilty... only by her way of being. But when I saw this cross examing and closing stantement of the prosecution, I thought it was wick. So wick the guy was being laught off in silence. She kinds of lets that come trought. The defense was violently agressive and win by that. And so was OJ´s trial... is it true?
To Getnasty08: Louise Woodward is not innocent, the judg let her off with a slapp on the wrist simply that she is a women and favoritism was involved. Had this would have been a male babysitter, he wouldnt have gotten off easy. Damn liberals
to: SDuff85: I believe you are right...it turned political & international. As I have stated here on this posting; It is damn lucky (for her) she commited this crime in the USA, where tha accused have more rights than in any other country on this planet. If this had happened in Great britain, they would have locked her up and thrown the key away and all the Brits would have praised the decision....but....because it was in the USA...we were the "bad guys" because europeans hate us.
'In Great britain, they would have locked her up and thrown the key away'
As the justice system in the UK is generally pretty crap I doubt it lol, but if she was guilty of murder yeah I'd like to think so but they wouldn't have just let her go like that if they believed she murdered him intentionally whatever people say. Whatever country it would have happened in the case and evidence would have been the same but I think the media just decided to turn it into an American vs British thing lol.
she was railroaded
cheech41 4 months ago
i believe his point was ...because the baby was cranky before he died she did it? not the fact that he may have been in pain etc?
i was 7 when this aired in the UK and i remember my mum in tears when they read out the sentance.
its all about money in american cases - get a good lawyer and get off free.
numba1danman 7 months ago
americans are hilarious, the point this so called 'lawyer' was making wasnt even to a point, it was just to be over dramatic and see how she reacted. the american system is terrible for getting the truth.
the truth is - there was nowhere near enough evidence to imply she had any effect on the death of this child and doctors still know relatively very little about babies.
it was about punishing someone....and a foreigner just happened to be there - i wonder who could have done it? hmmmm
numba1danman 7 months ago
She's actually laughing because throughout the trial her lawyer would pull funny faces at the prosecution behind their backs to make her feel less intimidated during cross-examination.
pinkjulespink 7 months ago
shes laughing because the question is a load of crap, clearly.
i know yanks wouldn't understand that.. they have little or no sense of humour.
rachisthebest0405 11 months ago
i think all murder trials should be broadcast live on tv, thats reality tv!!!
feng2707 1 year ago
How did the kid die if it wasnt her?
EffLabels 1 year ago
She's a young girl FFS. She's not laughing because she's pure evil. It's a nervous laughter and a British thing.
If you ask me the whole thing was probably a mixture of both Matthew sustaining injuries on his skull from previous weeks (check the evidence) and Louise handling him in a less than delicate way - and she probably panicked when he stopped breathing.
cezzie901 1 year ago
She is not laughing, she is bemused by some of the trivial & quite patronising questioning that is all. And probably smiling nervously...not to be nasty and inappropriate.
Whenever something awful happens especially with children there has to be someone to blame, a scapegoat to make everyone else feel better that justice was done. If some of you lot were intelligent enough to read, you'd understand the facts on this case before you judge someone just for the sake of blaming the nearest person.
Stagedoorjenny 1 year ago 10
She's enjoying this.....fucking criminal
memovp 1 year ago
no wonder so many people get put to death in the usa if this is justice i feel sorry for the people who had worse lawers
Raylufc 1 year ago
@Raylufc : example: in 2008 out of all the murderers in the usa (and their was plenty of them) only 37 were put to death. Out of these 37, most of them sat on death row for "years". 13 states don't even allow capital punishment in the USA....so its not like we are frying people righnt and left
inkey2 1 year ago
The jury was correct when they found Woodward GUILTY of MURDER.
Louise "the baby basher" Woodward should be in prison.
ChrisIIIcube 2 years ago
They didn't have a case. Not according to the medical evidence. She was just a kid and she smiled on the stand because she's not a cold blooded killer. She's a kid and she was railroaded. Evil fucks.
mimine101 2 years ago
mimine101, Her behavior during her testimony was extremely inappropriate. She was being asked questions about what happened to matthew and she was practically laughing.
DanteLacey21 2 years ago
laughin ur weird dude
gazoopi 2 years ago
Evil bitch!!
mercdriver 2 years ago
She's laughing because she's British and this American thinks he's in a film. She was innocent, as you Yanks say - Get over it.
tescocadaver 1 year ago
she surely killed that innocent baby. Woodward your day will come
flapper1920 2 years ago
completely wrong, and pathetic. your day will come
wfcyellow 2 years ago
she was guilty -she had only one goal in life -to have agood time(hence her coming to the US and her consistent late night gallivanting. She was not in a fit state each day to care kindly for that darling child. Again Woodward's day of punishment lies ahead!!!!
flapper1920 2 years ago
@flapper1920,settle down now.....behave.
ffairlane57 2 years ago
I remember this. Whether she's guilty or innocent I really disliked the prosecutor and the Eappen mother.
agatesky 2 years ago
She was proven innocent. The Eappens knew they killed their own child. They didn't want to deal with parenting so they can make a wide load of extra money. Pure greed. They didn't want Louise to publish her book after her name was cleared. It would've proven them to be the real killers. They exploited her as a bad person and stopped when she was proven completely innocent. They know they would be in deep shit if they kept exploiting her. They made even more money on the shaken baby shirts.
earjams1 2 years ago
Comment removed
inkey2 2 years ago
Louise had a fair trial. She was found guilty because she let herself down on the stand - you just don't snigger in that situation - you imagine your family all dead around you if you have to - and - even so - the jury were convinced however wrong their verdict may have been. I think they wanted justice for the parents - but what justice? Convict an innocent?
LPCLASSICAL 2 years ago
She's doing that because she was a kid...
andyboothismyhero 2 years ago
we will never truly know what really happened....but Louise Woodward makes a very bad impression on the stand....that smirking and smiling thing did not help her at all.
inkey2 2 years ago
True; but it's nervous smiling. I think most people, especially her age would do the same.
agatesky 2 years ago
ta tu an amadan
wickmay 2 years ago
im glad she got off, conspiracy i reckon
wickmay 2 years ago
To wickmay: Louise Woodward should have fryed in the electric chair, all these liberal/democrats all favored that she should serve a full life sentence
spitzbully 2 years ago
everyone has their own opinion, i have mine
wickmay 2 years ago
you are so right as the trial and evidence proved her guilt
flapper1920 2 years ago
I believed she could be guilty... only by her way of being. But when I saw this cross examing and closing stantement of the prosecution, I thought it was wick. So wick the guy was being laught off in silence. She kinds of lets that come trought. The defense was violently agressive and win by that. And so was OJ´s trial... is it true?
novelomania 2 years ago
to novelomania: what the heck does "wick" mean?
inkey2 2 years ago
I notice the mistake after posting: weak. Don´t U agree?
novelomania 2 years ago
Lawyer looks like des bishop
Soullight86 2 years ago
Do you have any tape of Barry Scheck cross examining in this case
alfredojack30 3 years ago
Unfurtunally no. This was a "saved by the bel" peace. And what a masterpeace!
portugsinha 3 years ago
Where can I find the footage of Louise Woodward being found guilty please?
Mugabe69 3 years ago
Comment removed
inkey2 3 years ago
Louise was innocent!! My whole family believe it to this day!
getnasty08 3 years ago
To Getnasty08: Louise Woodward is not innocent, the judg let her off with a slapp on the wrist simply that she is a women and favoritism was involved. Had this would have been a male babysitter, he wouldnt have gotten off easy. Damn liberals
spitzbully 2 years ago
Thanks for posting this video.
I remember sitting up all night waiting for the jury to return with their verdict.
The trial had added interest for me as my friend's sister was a junior member of the prosecution team.
Potsdamerplatz 3 years ago
The whole trial was a Britain vs America thing. The Tabs went mental when she got found guilty.
SDuff85 3 years ago
to: SDuff85: I believe you are right...it turned political & international. As I have stated here on this posting; It is damn lucky (for her) she commited this crime in the USA, where tha accused have more rights than in any other country on this planet. If this had happened in Great britain, they would have locked her up and thrown the key away and all the Brits would have praised the decision....but....because it was in the USA...we were the "bad guys" because europeans hate us.
inkey2 3 years ago
'In Great britain, they would have locked her up and thrown the key away'
As the justice system in the UK is generally pretty crap I doubt it lol, but if she was guilty of murder yeah I'd like to think so but they wouldn't have just let her go like that if they believed she murdered him intentionally whatever people say. Whatever country it would have happened in the case and evidence would have been the same but I think the media just decided to turn it into an American vs British thing lol.
Hipsishere 3 years ago 2