?? what? it the real explanation that particles are going into and out of existence? Those of you who know more, doesn't this get explained by dimension (going into other dimensions and returning)? Aren't quantum physicists known for their 13 dimensions?
Standing waves (nodes & anti-nodes) that represent a particle's "existence" within an atom could "exist" both above and below the quantal timeline of existence, so that time, like the wave, stands "still" within standing wave functions. Alas it also accounts for a space-time wave-continuity unleashing "spooky action at a distance". As mentioned, a wave takes ALL paths between two points, coalescing instanteously as a probablistic partial deriviative of time. Space time curvature distorts time.
All of this has classical explanations. We could discuss how photons decay, how suns create photonic crystals which magnify a few photons to look like uberzillions. We could discuss the magnetic monopole with its superconducting Hookean tail with the measurable elastic modulus and attached to either an oppositely charged virtual positron (a decayed proton) or another electron in a Cooper-pair. Picture the oscillating monotail making propogation waves in the particle soup o'quarks. ETC.
10 HOURS OF READING MY STUPID TEXTBOOK AND TALKING TO STUPID TA'S AND PROFESSORS TO TRY AND UNDERSTAND THE NONSENSE THEY WERE TALKING, AND IN 2 MINUTES THIS GUY EXPLAINED TO ME WHAT I WANTED TO KNOW
NAMELY, WTFFFFFFFFFFFF DOES IT MEAN TO SAY "AN ELECTRON BEHAVES LIKE A WAVE AND NOT A PARTICLE"
If you have told one lie, that makes you a liar. If you have stolen one thing, that makes you a thief. JESUS said; if you look at a person with lust, you commit adultery in your heart! Ever used GOD's name in vain; then you are a blasphemer and can't enter GOD's kingdom! Rev. 21v8 says; "All liars will have their part in the lake of fire!" The bible says; No thief or adulterer will inherit GOD's kingdom! You broke GOD's laws; but JESUS paid your fine! Repent, and trust the Savior!
@EXALTEDDIRT, Alright it looks like that nobody else wants to do it, so i will. Get out of here with your biblical nonsense, it bores people to tears. I mean come on man, it doesn't work. Just give it up. FUCK.
if you get out of existence where do you go to? inexistence??? i think you cant go into and out of an abstract idea.. that shit is nice.... theory of the shitness of quantum physics
I think that the start/introduction of a media text (e.g. this video) is crucial to grabbing the audiences attention, or in this situation, repel them. Luckily the distortion of mankind ends at 0:19
"I am software." Do not forget that much of what you are is stored in the physical structure of your brain. Neurons form new synnapses and extensions according to how they are currently used, programmed to try to maximize effectivity of data transmission. Much information is stored in activation loops between a number of individual brain cells. The hardware grows according to the activity of the software in certain areas of the brain, also called neuroplasticity.
So you are not just software, your hardware corresponds and is shaped by your software. Studies have shown that when learning how to juggle 3 or more balls a certain area of the brain physically grows in size, and this is not only true for young people but for seinors as well, as shown by a follow-up study! So you are not just software, there clearly is a physical component.
yea yea, that's the fun: trying to understand quantum mechanics you end up realizing that the matter itself is just information... so my "physical brain" IS software. From the biological point of view thats make sense too, cause this "growing" of the brain is computed by genetic information... so I am software. @kurtilein3
Difficult, very difficult. Your physical brain is hardware, but hardware that changes according to what it does. You could simulate and emulate the whole, putting that hardware on a software level, but in reality there are two obstacles: We do not know enough about the human brain to do it, and it would require OBSCENE processing power because all computers we have never change, or if they do its an error.
also, im studying quantum mechanics right now. The structures in our brain are too big and too hot for real quantum effects to influence it in a meaningful way. By natural selection, our neurons developed in such a way that quantum effects do NOT affect these systems. All neuronal structured are far above the quantum scales, and too complex and too hot and to ooften interacting with themselves for any quantum effects to take hold.
Ok, quantum mechanics don't affect tought. But it affect the matter of my body and of my brain. When I said "i am software" I was thinking about the nature of matter itself. Best physical explanations treats matter as information, and not as solid balls with some properties anymore... and that happens cause we want to know HOW this properties works. What do you think?
I think it will not be long until scientists manage to create an artificial mind / an artifical consciousness inside a supercomputer. And then i dont know what happens, it may be very intelligent, but it wont have the neuroplasticity we have because the hardware it uses cannot change. Difficult. But maybe even the neuroplasticity could be modeled somehow, but i think it would require enourmous processing power.
also, when you train certain parts of your brain really hard, which causes them to grow, this is not determined by your genetic code. It is your decision and the following actions, when for example you start to practise the piano or juggling, that cause the changes, it is not genetically determined. Also you will not be able to pass this on to your children directly, you need to teach them. So its totally outside of quantum mechanics, also outside of genetics, but you can teach it.
Thanks for replying. The "part you can teach" can be analysed as memes. And it becomes a very disturbing idea if you accept that our thinking is determined by memetic laws. I really don't like it. But if we consider that all our decision comes "automatically" from available information, we look like a machine even more. But "like" is far away from "truth". Can humans create anything beyond: copying, mixing or use random information? @kurtilein3
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on just two postulates,
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
Thanks! I wanted a more in depth explanation of things being particles and waves after watching the naked science episode on parallel universes. Fascinating!!!
How, Why?? This is bunch of bologna, with all due respect, You never get to the why's and how's just keep stumbling around like all the rest of the people in quantum mechanics....
Couldn't there be elements that aren't present on this planet, but in other parts of the universe. Would there atomic structure behave differently then the elements on this planet.
There are a number of statements that don't match my understanding of wave-particle duality.
Waves describe the probability of finding a particle at a given location. Particles always behave like particles. We just can't know where the particle is. A wave may have multiple maxima, but particles don't exist at more than one place at one time. We never measure the "same" particle at two different locations simultaneously. If we did, they would not be in the same universe.
@AThagoras I'm having problems with this too. I don't see how existence is waving. For all I know, the wave of a particle is a wave function which describes the probability.
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
@Praw48 aw is that really true ? :( cuz i got really excited when he explained the fact that the particle exists then doesn’t exist. then does exist and then doesn’t exist. this isn’t what particle duality means?? Does this only apply to small particles?
@juble3, nono, you've gotten it right, the only problem is that this VIDEO doesnt really explain that idea :P
Wave particle duality isnt about the existance of particles or not, but the fact that a particle can act like a wave, whenever it wants to >_> guh, physics eh?
@Praw48 Haha, oh. well, is the De Broglie wave inaccurate? and the wave function is a more accurate probabilistic representation of particles and how they act as waves?
In one of Richard Dawkins books he says that it is physically possible for a statue to wave (and of course the probability is astronomically small) because of the jumping around of atoms in a solid. Is this view still compatible with current quantum mechanics, etc?
I'm trying to find a connection between characters with duality and quantum mechanics. Such as Terry Maloy in On the Waterfront, a brutish boxer who has a soft tender side. That's duality but I guess I'm stretching for a connection... any thoughts?
Curious, does anyone here know, if a electron can appear, then dissipate, even exist in two or more places at once, then does that mean the weight of the atom changes as well? Or is the energy and mass of that particle constant?
Hi. As light acts as particle and wave, it appears to me light is constructed of billionths of an electron, or trillionths of a proton, and great collections of these undetectable particles travel as waves.
This would also explain 1) Why light traveling passed the sun is bent. 2) Why everything in the universe has physical properties; including light which is interchangeable with solid mass, and back into light and radiative energy constantly according to forces impressed upon them.
You say that now, but when trying to actually work with this data, this concept is extremely difficult. (along with the equations describing wave-particle motion)
@1:51-2:01 "These particles can appear out of the nothingness of space. They can exist for an extremely brief instant, and then disappear."
So much for the creationist's failed excuse that "you can't get something out of nothing, therefore the universe had to have a creator! And that creator was god!"
Evidently, according to these scientific facts- Yes it can! Something can literally come from nothing! Science FTW! Everytime!
this doesn't make sense to me. electrons "teleport"? How can they do that? To disappear and reaper somewhere else means that it must stop existing at point a then start existing again at point b. That doesn't sound possible. What is the method of travel electrons use?
it would seem that on the scale of things the size of electrons the concept of "method" and "travel" and "time" mean very different things than they do at larger scales. To expect the world to work the same way in the minuscule scale world as it does on larger scales is like expecting an ant to be able to drive an SUV without making any modifications....
thats cus human logic is based on our level of existence ...wich is literally in centimeters ...
in small scale there is a different set of laws of physics ..
just like if u could go smaller than the plank lenght there could be totally different laws than quantum mechanics ..for all we know there could be entire universes smaller than the plank lenghts ...
@Shigren: To a layman like me, it looks like when we get down to a certain level, time starts working in "ticks" instead of a continuum. It's all very confusing, so I'm eager to learn even more. :-)
It's wrong to say that an electron exists at point A, stops existing there and then starts existing at point B. Rather, at a given point, the electron, as a wave function, simultaneously occupies every point in the universe that it *can* occupy. Some of those points have a very high probability, some a very low probability. But when the wave collapses, the electron *can* appear at any point predicted by the probability curve.
This is how electron tunneling in semi-conductors works, by the way.
and thats not very accurate either cus for small duration of time particle can not exist at all , for other ammounts of time they exist in more places at once ....its comeplete chaos ...
As I understand it, QT predicts that, for a given particle, until there's an observation (or depending on which interpretation of the theory one embraces, an irreversible interaction) a particle like an electron exists in every possible state simultaneously. Some are very likely, some extremely unlikely. Those possible states include that a particle can simply jump from one side of a doped semi-conductor to the other side (that's how they work) or from one side of the galaxy to the other side.
Einstein raised the same objection in respect to what's referred to as "quantum entanglement" - something he called "spooky action at a distance" - the fact that two particles may be emitted from the same place, travel literally the distance of a galaxy apart, then the observation of a single particle causes *both* particles to assume particular distinct states, no matter how far apart.
And this effect has been confirmed.
But It doesn't violate FTL because you can't use it to communicate.
I'm afraid higher dimensions simply have nothing to do with it. Both Q entanglement and superposition of the states of an electron (including electron tunneling) are an aspect of the uncertainty principle.
Electron tunneling is teleportation -- because there's a finite possibility that an electron will cease to exist in one place and come into existence in another - just as there's a finite possibility that an electron pair will come into existence out of nothing. That's a virtual particle.
The entanglement of distant particles is a prediction of QM and that prediction has nothing to do with higher dimensions.
The reason that the particles are "entangled" is because until an observation is made, the 2 particles simply don't have a distinct existence in 2 different locations and states. It's that *uncertainty* that causes them to be continually connected until an observation collapses the wave function. When 1 particle is observed, both assume distinct states, however distant.
The Max Headroom lookalike and CG voice synthesis distracts from what would otherwise be valuable and interesting information. I couldn't watch to the end.
Existence is vibrational energy, its just that in the very small, it breaks all of the physical rules of the known universe of the very large. So, right now, at CERN they are trying to find the Boson Higgs particle to come up with a unifying theory of everything.
The CG models aren't bad, but the jerky motion is crap, and the eyes are epic in fail. People use their eyes to look at things, including other people when to them. Without that much of the actual quality of the models detail, including good mouth work, makes a difference.
The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known, and vice versa!
Tnavarro1423 4 days ago
What is the music used in this video?
hexmeohdear 1 week ago
Okay, this is cool. Fuck you for making me take an exam. But this is cool.
OswaldtheFourth 1 week ago
amazing vid but why the creepy people at the start?
dedly13 1 week ago
Crazy!!
CITAContent 2 weeks ago
?? what? it the real explanation that particles are going into and out of existence? Those of you who know more, doesn't this get explained by dimension (going into other dimensions and returning)? Aren't quantum physicists known for their 13 dimensions?
CITAContent 2 weeks ago
Tommy likey. Tommy want wingy.
harlowsolid 3 weeks ago
This is a great video
jessyjessy4 1 month ago
very interesting video thanks
msjessypp 1 month ago
Question... was this made with Garry's Mod?
applejaksenpai 2 months ago
whats with all the retarded mispronounciations?
mattyisagod 2 months ago
Standing waves (nodes & anti-nodes) that represent a particle's "existence" within an atom could "exist" both above and below the quantal timeline of existence, so that time, like the wave, stands "still" within standing wave functions. Alas it also accounts for a space-time wave-continuity unleashing "spooky action at a distance". As mentioned, a wave takes ALL paths between two points, coalescing instanteously as a probablistic partial deriviative of time. Space time curvature distorts time.
ohwhererehwho 2 months ago
So,,, "What is waving?" Ans.: Existence. Does this notion of existence implies a quantal unit of time?
ohwhererehwho 2 months ago
Wow. First time I've actually found an answer to the question I've had for a long time now.
jnddepew 2 months ago
will it blend?
MyQwerqwerqwerqwerqw 3 months ago
why is the equation waving around. I wanna see it lol
MRincorperated 3 months ago
Thumbs up if ur here for chemistry hw... lol
C00lman555 3 months ago 14
This stuff makes me cry
daikiryoku 3 months ago
All of this has classical explanations. We could discuss how photons decay, how suns create photonic crystals which magnify a few photons to look like uberzillions. We could discuss the magnetic monopole with its superconducting Hookean tail with the measurable elastic modulus and attached to either an oppositely charged virtual positron (a decayed proton) or another electron in a Cooper-pair. Picture the oscillating monotail making propogation waves in the particle soup o'quarks. ETC.
SuperZekethefreak 3 months ago
Yeah, the animation was weird but the Physics & presentation was accurate & interesting. Good stuff.
bravekingsolomon 5 months ago
HOLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY CRAPPPPPPPPPPP.
10 HOURS OF READING MY STUPID TEXTBOOK AND TALKING TO STUPID TA'S AND PROFESSORS TO TRY AND UNDERSTAND THE NONSENSE THEY WERE TALKING, AND IN 2 MINUTES THIS GUY EXPLAINED TO ME WHAT I WANTED TO KNOW
NAMELY, WTFFFFFFFFFFFF DOES IT MEAN TO SAY "AN ELECTRON BEHAVES LIKE A WAVE AND NOT A PARTICLE"
THANK YOU GOOD SIR
freeshyne1234 5 months ago
If you have told one lie, that makes you a liar. If you have stolen one thing, that makes you a thief. JESUS said; if you look at a person with lust, you commit adultery in your heart! Ever used GOD's name in vain; then you are a blasphemer and can't enter GOD's kingdom! Rev. 21v8 says; "All liars will have their part in the lake of fire!" The bible says; No thief or adulterer will inherit GOD's kingdom! You broke GOD's laws; but JESUS paid your fine! Repent, and trust the Savior!
EXALTEDDIRT 5 months ago
@EXALTEDDIRT, Alright it looks like that nobody else wants to do it, so i will. Get out of here with your biblical nonsense, it bores people to tears. I mean come on man, it doesn't work. Just give it up. FUCK.
pommyrooter 2 months ago
I think the the wave is caused by the vibration of the particle cause wave in the tissue of space
fadilouseck 5 months ago
hahah how did he know? it DOES sound like a bunch of gobbly-gook!
unjustpork 5 months ago
quantum mechanics, the dreams stuff is made of!
my head hurts now!
37butterflyprincess 5 months ago
WTF?
testiclecrusher2 6 months ago
if you get out of existence where do you go to? inexistence??? i think you cant go into and out of an abstract idea.. that shit is nice.... theory of the shitness of quantum physics
HumveeRazon 6 months ago
"if you claim to understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics" - Richard Feymann.
Apparently, Richard Feymann has never heard of Chuck Norris.
p7byrd 6 months ago 27
This is the best principle ever discovered, Long Live Werner Heisenberg who coined Quantum Mechanics!
Tnavarro1423 5 days ago
Excellent lesson on particle v. wave behavior - very enlightening!
thescottguy 6 months ago
I think that the start/introduction of a media text (e.g. this video) is crucial to grabbing the audiences attention, or in this situation, repel them. Luckily the distortion of mankind ends at 0:19
aligh18 7 months ago
do you really need lame ass 3d characters, lame music and lame echo effects to explain something? it's pretty lame...
avrilinblood 8 months ago
@avrilinblood Do you really super cool story to, bro?
MikeRoePhonicsMusic 7 months ago
I am software.
nobrainQQ 8 months ago
@nobrainQQ
"I am software." Do not forget that much of what you are is stored in the physical structure of your brain. Neurons form new synnapses and extensions according to how they are currently used, programmed to try to maximize effectivity of data transmission. Much information is stored in activation loops between a number of individual brain cells. The hardware grows according to the activity of the software in certain areas of the brain, also called neuroplasticity.
kurtilein3 8 months ago
@nobrainQQ
So you are not just software, your hardware corresponds and is shaped by your software. Studies have shown that when learning how to juggle 3 or more balls a certain area of the brain physically grows in size, and this is not only true for young people but for seinors as well, as shown by a follow-up study! So you are not just software, there clearly is a physical component.
kurtilein3 8 months ago
yea yea, that's the fun: trying to understand quantum mechanics you end up realizing that the matter itself is just information... so my "physical brain" IS software. From the biological point of view thats make sense too, cause this "growing" of the brain is computed by genetic information... so I am software. @kurtilein3
nobrainQQ 8 months ago
@nobrainQQ
Difficult, very difficult. Your physical brain is hardware, but hardware that changes according to what it does. You could simulate and emulate the whole, putting that hardware on a software level, but in reality there are two obstacles: We do not know enough about the human brain to do it, and it would require OBSCENE processing power because all computers we have never change, or if they do its an error.
kurtilein3 8 months ago
@nobrainQQ
also, im studying quantum mechanics right now. The structures in our brain are too big and too hot for real quantum effects to influence it in a meaningful way. By natural selection, our neurons developed in such a way that quantum effects do NOT affect these systems. All neuronal structured are far above the quantum scales, and too complex and too hot and to ooften interacting with themselves for any quantum effects to take hold.
kurtilein3 8 months ago
Ok, quantum mechanics don't affect tought. But it affect the matter of my body and of my brain. When I said "i am software" I was thinking about the nature of matter itself. Best physical explanations treats matter as information, and not as solid balls with some properties anymore... and that happens cause we want to know HOW this properties works. What do you think?
@kurtilein3
nobrainQQ 8 months ago
@nobrainQQ
I think it will not be long until scientists manage to create an artificial mind / an artifical consciousness inside a supercomputer. And then i dont know what happens, it may be very intelligent, but it wont have the neuroplasticity we have because the hardware it uses cannot change. Difficult. But maybe even the neuroplasticity could be modeled somehow, but i think it would require enourmous processing power.
kurtilein3 8 months ago
@nobrainQQ
also, when you train certain parts of your brain really hard, which causes them to grow, this is not determined by your genetic code. It is your decision and the following actions, when for example you start to practise the piano or juggling, that cause the changes, it is not genetically determined. Also you will not be able to pass this on to your children directly, you need to teach them. So its totally outside of quantum mechanics, also outside of genetics, but you can teach it.
kurtilein3 8 months ago
Thanks for replying. The "part you can teach" can be analysed as memes. And it becomes a very disturbing idea if you accept that our thinking is determined by memetic laws. I really don't like it. But if we consider that all our decision comes "automatically" from available information, we look like a machine even more. But "like" is far away from "truth". Can humans create anything beyond: copying, mixing or use random information? @kurtilein3
nobrainQQ 8 months ago
Schrodinger didn't drink or smoke, except when he was drinking or smoking.
gamesbok 8 months ago
@gamesbok thats whats up haha. [schrodinger may have been here]
420dankykush 8 months ago
this is video is quite be marvelllous
ThePrinceanilkumar 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on just two postulates,
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
nickharvey7 9 months ago
micro cosmos explained, the macro cosmos works in a similar way.
windandfire22 9 months ago
But does it explain his Cat?
anntracy51 9 months ago
Thanks! I wanted a more in depth explanation of things being particles and waves after watching the naked science episode on parallel universes. Fascinating!!!
KatrinaJuneM 9 months ago
i still don't get it
skitch88 10 months ago
How, Why?? This is bunch of bologna, with all due respect, You never get to the why's and how's just keep stumbling around like all the rest of the people in quantum mechanics....
nyer070 10 months ago
sorry. this is absolute bullshit. nice video though.
Samgurney88 10 months ago
@Samgurney88 Probably because you don't understand it?
bbnl1990 9 months ago
Thanks. This is a helpful explanation of the duality. Awesome stuff.
cunnidvd 11 months ago
Way to completely mispronounce de Broglie.
SaraCufer 11 months ago
When you say existence is waving, are you talking about the wave function?
SaraCufer 11 months ago
So are these "waves of existence" the building blocks of all things in string theory??
If I'm right in thinking that, I'd be happy. =P But please tell me if I'm right or wrong.
Tribune12345 1 year ago
what was the equation that erwin schrodinger wrote to describe the nature of the previously stated(in the video) ?
bizzywitlyfe 1 year ago
what was the equation that erwin schrodinger wrote to describe the nature of the previously stated(in the video) ?
bizzywitlyfe 1 year ago
Couldn't there be elements that aren't present on this planet, but in other parts of the universe. Would there atomic structure behave differently then the elements on this planet.
happysteve3000 1 year ago
There are a number of statements that don't match my understanding of wave-particle duality.
Waves describe the probability of finding a particle at a given location. Particles always behave like particles. We just can't know where the particle is. A wave may have multiple maxima, but particles don't exist at more than one place at one time. We never measure the "same" particle at two different locations simultaneously. If we did, they would not be in the same universe.
Am I not correct?
AThagoras 1 year ago
@AThagoras I'm having problems with this too. I don't see how existence is waving. For all I know, the wave of a particle is a wave function which describes the probability.
SaraCufer 11 months ago
Nicely done. Thumbs up.
DrDeist 1 year ago
Damn I'm trying to understand some Quantum Physics for my upcoming Chemistry test but can't understand a damn thing. This is all jibberish to me.
xRaIDeNx69 1 year ago
@xRaIDeNx69 ikr lol
etizzei1 4 months ago
OH YEAH ALSO CHECK OUT HOW TO MAKE A UNIVERSE EVEN MORE F-ED UP
ricktbdgc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IF YOU LIKE THIS CHECK OUT ARTYNZ - WAVE STRUCTURE OF MATTER AND CYCLES OF THE UNIVERSE, IT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND
ricktbdgc 1 year ago
@August1977 idiot
FIGHTFANNERD3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,if you want a real Free energy Magnet Motor, get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
rebelliouseoagj 1 year ago
This is too haphazard, it doesnt explain the wave-particle duality, or the issue, at all.
Praw48 1 year ago
@Praw48 aw is that really true ? :( cuz i got really excited when he explained the fact that the particle exists then doesn’t exist. then does exist and then doesn’t exist. this isn’t what particle duality means?? Does this only apply to small particles?
juble3 1 year ago
@juble3, nono, you've gotten it right, the only problem is that this VIDEO doesnt really explain that idea :P
Wave particle duality isnt about the existance of particles or not, but the fact that a particle can act like a wave, whenever it wants to >_> guh, physics eh?
Praw48 1 year ago
@Praw48 Haha, oh. well, is the De Broglie wave inaccurate? and the wave function is a more accurate probabilistic representation of particles and how they act as waves?
juble3 1 year ago
In one of Richard Dawkins books he says that it is physically possible for a statue to wave (and of course the probability is astronomically small) because of the jumping around of atoms in a solid. Is this view still compatible with current quantum mechanics, etc?
TehOwnerer999 1 year ago
0:49 gobblygook?
sorry8140 1 year ago
fascinating.
ryanchappel1 1 year ago
Gaaah!! Stop pronouncing Schrodinger 'Schrodinjer'!!! o_O
Other than that, brilliant video :P
curiousmind5632 1 year ago
Schroedingers cat...checkmate!
TheMulchmeister 1 year ago
I'm trying to find a connection between characters with duality and quantum mechanics. Such as Terry Maloy in On the Waterfront, a brutish boxer who has a soft tender side. That's duality but I guess I'm stretching for a connection... any thoughts?
DanRioNY 1 year ago
Curious, does anyone here know, if a electron can appear, then dissipate, even exist in two or more places at once, then does that mean the weight of the atom changes as well? Or is the energy and mass of that particle constant?
Just curious.
kingcurtiss 1 year ago
Hi. As light acts as particle and wave, it appears to me light is constructed of billionths of an electron, or trillionths of a proton, and great collections of these undetectable particles travel as waves.
This would also explain 1) Why light traveling passed the sun is bent. 2) Why everything in the universe has physical properties; including light which is interchangeable with solid mass, and back into light and radiative energy constantly according to forces impressed upon them.
EGMAG 1 year ago
anyone with common sense (minimum 7th grade education) can simply understand that this means "NOTHING CAN BE MEASURED AND ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE."
atlantisiscalling1 1 year ago
chicken fries! mmmmmmmm.... :D
rexitito 1 year ago
chicken fries mmmmmm..... :D
rexitito 1 year ago
is it just me or are the CGI guys kinda creepy?
screws2loose 1 year ago
IVe never understood what those smoke clouds are at 4:10 Are they those ckouds that creates stars :O?
JollSSteR 1 year ago
@JollSSteR thats where stars are born.
BoostedECO 1 year ago
@BoostedECO i learned that right after i posted the question but thank you very much indeed anyways :P
JollSSteR 1 year ago
Comment removed
JollSSteR 1 year ago
I'm scared of these computer animated guys
xxuschix3 1 year ago 40
Amazing!
martintzvetomirov 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
quantum physics is awesome when youre stoned.
TheCaptainLulz 2 years ago 118
haha i watch all these videos baked out of my mind
KableKiB420 1 year ago 2
@TheCaptainLulz I have the LHC (Large Hydro Conelighter) just for that.... Nothing like experiencing the big bang with a big bong!
conefucius 1 year ago
@conefucius and the big bong gets better with every big haul! X)
TheCaptainLulz 1 year ago
@TheCaptainLulz im high right now.
ryanchappel1 1 year ago
@TheCaptainLulz thats sad for you 54 other morons
FIGHTFANNERD3 1 year ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3 some people like a bit of fun in their lives. Youre clearly not one of them. go back to your text books.
TheCaptainLulz 1 year ago
@TheCaptainLulz Damn straight.
nicwilson89 1 year ago
@TheCaptainLulz
You say that now, but when trying to actually work with this data, this concept is extremely difficult. (along with the equations describing wave-particle motion)
MattyHild 1 year ago
@MattyHild you missed the part where I was stoned.
TheCaptainLulz 1 year ago
@TheCaptainLulz
>_<
MattyHild 1 year ago
@TheCaptainLulz ? Uh it's just as awesome when you're sober.
music2012 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1:51-2:01 "These particles can appear out of the nothingness of space. They can exist for an extremely brief instant, and then disappear."
So much for the creationist's failed excuse that "you can't get something out of nothing, therefore the universe had to have a creator! And that creator was god!"
Evidently, according to these scientific facts- Yes it can! Something can literally come from nothing! Science FTW! Everytime!
MisterBoswell 2 years ago
Comment removed
MisterBoswell 2 years ago
It dosen't make sense to anybody yet but it dose make sense, otherwise we wouldn't be here to try to understand it
datman22000 2 years ago 5
this doesn't make sense to me. electrons "teleport"? How can they do that? To disappear and reaper somewhere else means that it must stop existing at point a then start existing again at point b. That doesn't sound possible. What is the method of travel electrons use?
Shigren 2 years ago
That's the problem with quantum mechanics; it's all very counter intuitive. That's why most people don't understand it ( including me).
JmSantos78 2 years ago 2
it would seem that on the scale of things the size of electrons the concept of "method" and "travel" and "time" mean very different things than they do at larger scales. To expect the world to work the same way in the minuscule scale world as it does on larger scales is like expecting an ant to be able to drive an SUV without making any modifications....
zx1011 2 years ago 2
Quantum mechanics doesn't make sense. It isn't logical. But this is what the evidence shows.
purplefuzzythings 2 years ago
Indeed. As they say, "truth is stranger than fiction".
MisterBoswell 2 years ago
thats cus human logic is based on our level of existence ...wich is literally in centimeters ...
in small scale there is a different set of laws of physics ..
just like if u could go smaller than the plank lenght there could be totally different laws than quantum mechanics ..for all we know there could be entire universes smaller than the plank lenghts ...
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
@Shigren: To a layman like me, it looks like when we get down to a certain level, time starts working in "ticks" instead of a continuum. It's all very confusing, so I'm eager to learn even more. :-)
Mankepanke 2 years ago 2
Not understanding it is what makes me want to learn it too =)
Shigren 2 years ago 2
It's wrong to say that an electron exists at point A, stops existing there and then starts existing at point B. Rather, at a given point, the electron, as a wave function, simultaneously occupies every point in the universe that it *can* occupy. Some of those points have a very high probability, some a very low probability. But when the wave collapses, the electron *can* appear at any point predicted by the probability curve.
This is how electron tunneling in semi-conductors works, by the way.
prodprod 2 years ago
saying universe is kinda missleading ...it occupies a relatively small space ...but compared to its size its huge.
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
and thats not very accurate either cus for small duration of time particle can not exist at all , for other ammounts of time they exist in more places at once ....its comeplete chaos ...
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
As I understand it, QT predicts that, for a given particle, until there's an observation (or depending on which interpretation of the theory one embraces, an irreversible interaction) a particle like an electron exists in every possible state simultaneously. Some are very likely, some extremely unlikely. Those possible states include that a particle can simply jump from one side of a doped semi-conductor to the other side (that's how they work) or from one side of the galaxy to the other side.
prodprod 2 years ago
i dont think they can literally jump from one side of the galaxy to the other side , that would be faster than light ...or teleportation ....
i understand they only jump in their restricted area ...the smaller the particle the bigger the area but not light years thats way to much.
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
Einstein raised the same objection in respect to what's referred to as "quantum entanglement" - something he called "spooky action at a distance" - the fact that two particles may be emitted from the same place, travel literally the distance of a galaxy apart, then the observation of a single particle causes *both* particles to assume particular distinct states, no matter how far apart.
And this effect has been confirmed.
But It doesn't violate FTL because you can't use it to communicate.
prodprod 2 years ago
i know but its not like what u previously said that a single particle could be across a galaxy at the same time ..
i think quantum entanglemen can be explained in terms of adittional dimensions ...
maybe the space time between the 2 particle is actually 0 distance in a superior dimension but appears to be light years in 3d ...
anyways it doesnt violate light speed cus nothing is travelling.
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
I'm afraid higher dimensions simply have nothing to do with it. Both Q entanglement and superposition of the states of an electron (including electron tunneling) are an aspect of the uncertainty principle.
Electron tunneling is teleportation -- because there's a finite possibility that an electron will cease to exist in one place and come into existence in another - just as there's a finite possibility that an electron pair will come into existence out of nothing. That's a virtual particle.
prodprod 2 years ago
yes but i dont think uncertainty has anything to do with entanglement?
i mean 1 electrons changes its spin right at the same time another electron changes its spin at any distance ..
but how does that involve uncertainty? its basicly 2 particles changing states in syncronisity at any distance....
the only way i could explain it is if the distance between them is actually 0 in another dimension..
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
The entanglement of distant particles is a prediction of QM and that prediction has nothing to do with higher dimensions.
The reason that the particles are "entangled" is because until an observation is made, the 2 particles simply don't have a distinct existence in 2 different locations and states. It's that *uncertainty* that causes them to be continually connected until an observation collapses the wave function. When 1 particle is observed, both assume distinct states, however distant.
prodprod 2 years ago
Comment removed
BUDA20 2 years ago
Fucking beautiful.
Phelan666 2 years ago 3
@Phelan666 i know exactly what you mean
TehOwnerer999 2 years ago
yay european scientists
insanic1 2 years ago
Quantum mechanics blows my mind! I'm excited for part 4
Roobitz 2 years ago
Mr. White Shirt sounds like Sexual Harassment Panda
etoposide 2 years ago
looool
ROLNIKxPL 2 years ago
Those Characters don`t took too bad actually.
They look like they were generated with poser. A great program IMO.
AcanLord 2 years ago
You mean Trivial Pursuit? If so, that's a pretty great unintentional pun.
Gesmehod 2 years ago
2:33 "Existence is waving."
At the risk of sounding unintellectual... that's fuckin' awesome! :-D
SourcesAreEverything 2 years ago 48
Actually I think many scientist use that expression when they encounter something new. You are safe and sound brother.
omegavalerius 2 years ago
It's the new "Eureka"
SourcesAreEverything 2 years ago
If that doesn't blow the minds of even the most intelligent physicists , there is a good chance that they have the wrong job.
Phelan666 2 years ago
@SourcesAreEverything totally my favorite part.
daisyetbob 1 year ago
great to see the wave function again after so many years.
HolidayNova 2 years ago
The Max Headroom lookalike and CG voice synthesis distracts from what would otherwise be valuable and interesting information. I couldn't watch to the end.
OccamsView 2 years ago 2
What's up with the weird CG guy thoughout this video?
anyways good Vid.. 5*
PhillipThunderGrunge 2 years ago
Wow.
jebus6kryst 2 years ago
Great video.Five Stars *****
JustinBringit 2 years ago
The characters are part of a cover story underlying the Cassoipeia Project. You can read about it at cassiopeiaproject com.
puncheex 2 years ago
I love this topic.
gtssage 2 years ago
This is the stuff that all of us are made of. How can we be so certain of what or where we are?
yuradumas 2 years ago
@yuradumas
Apparent consistency.
TritonAlias 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i stopped it halfway through because i felt my IQ drop. however, if this is true, i now understand teleportation
sorry8140 2 years ago
Comment removed
kirke420 2 years ago
Comment removed
kirke420 2 years ago
This kind of stuff is boring! Just kidding! It is the most fascinating, mind warping subject I have ever come across. I love it!
juggaloryan3 2 years ago
The CGI people and the echoing voice to make it scary and amusing at the same time.
truvelocity 2 years ago 2
I thought he would've named it The Dance Of Life! :)
DecentralizedByGuilt 2 years ago
I thought that the existence of "particles" where the definition of existence. What is existence?
TheOats 2 years ago
Existence is vibrational energy, its just that in the very small, it breaks all of the physical rules of the known universe of the very large. So, right now, at CERN they are trying to find the Boson Higgs particle to come up with a unifying theory of everything.
truvelocity 2 years ago
I love these vids, but are those two animated guys really necessary?
cappastrano 2 years ago 5
mind = blown
bulbinking 2 years ago
worst cgi people ever
m00ph00 2 years ago
are these all mind-experiments or has it actually been observed through a superawesomeelectron-microscope? anyways very interesting movie
bangNL94 2 years ago
I've learned these concepts in my undergrad... hard stuff to learn, but beautiful once you grasp it
Bfly99 2 years ago 2
The CG models aren't bad, but the jerky motion is crap, and the eyes are epic in fail. People use their eyes to look at things, including other people when to them. Without that much of the actual quality of the models detail, including good mouth work, makes a difference.
jpl10380 2 years ago
That bald dude at the start looks like Jim Robinson with moobs.
ZucchiniEscobar 2 years ago
Comment removed
Pseudoscience 2 years ago
Holy shit, that makes sense, sort of, kinda, not really.
Shalek 2 years ago
RISE AND SHINE MR FREEMAN
decemius 2 years ago
@morehate4uall
"...looks like he has tits"
Gotta get the viewers somehow ;P
godlessmessiah 2 years ago
Still not a fan of those talking characters. I'd rather it be completely narrated.
AlphaCrucis 2 years ago 4
Mind=Blown.
nemo3590 2 years ago
I could make a parody of these animated people..
just insanely launch myself in all possible directions whilst speaking..haha
godlessmessiah 2 years ago