Prophet peace be upon him said "Allah is my maula, I am the maula of all of you, and whosoever's maula I am Ali is his maula. He is the wali of every momin after me. Abubakr and umar said mubarak first to Áli. So the master of abubakr and umar was ali.
Ali is the Maula (Master, guide, friend, superior) of Abubakr and all the momineen. The prophet peace be upon him said that Ällah is my maula, I am the maula of you all, and whosoever's maula I am, Ali is his maula and wali after me...So Mohammad is moula kainat, and in his wirasat Ali is maula kainat. Then the prophet raised his hands and prayed Ö Allah be the Wali of him who has Ali as his wali and be the enemy of him who has Ali as his enemy.
don't try to make abu bakar as a hero of islam infact he was and his two successors umer and usman were khayen. when RASUL ALLAH(s.a.w) gave the qutba hajjat ul wida and told muslims that ALLAH Is mola and i'm your mola and whome belive it ALI is his mola and RASUL ALLAH(s.a.w) says i'm leaving two precious things with you, one is kitab ALLAH and other is my AHELEBAIT. don't leave these two things. these will take you to paradise otherwise you will lose the path of truth.
The......... (When 'Umar became the Caliph) he gave the wives of the Prophet the option of either having the land and water as their shares, or carrying on the previous practice. Some of them chose the land and some chose the Wasqs, and 'Aisha chose the land.
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 39, Number 521
Please explain why is umar giving the wives of the prophet option of land when abu bakr denied Fatima (3) fadak. I thought that the prophets do not leave anything as inheritance?
That land (of Khaybar) - unlike Fadak - was still in the hands of Jews when the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) died
It was not untill 'Umar kicked them out that he gave Ummahât al-Mu'mineen a share of the land, and he only did this as a continuation of the tradition established by the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam)
"Allah's Apostle gave the land of Khaibar to the Jews on the condition that they work on it and cultivate it, and be given half of its yield." Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 39, Number 524
"...The Prophet used to give his wives (from the land's yield) one hundred Wasqs each, eighty Wasqs of dates and twenty Wasqs of barley."
It is clear that the prophet owned this land & he only allowed the jews to cultivate it & receive half the benefit. & not as you said above that the prophet gave the land to the jews. If there is a FALSE or contradicting in your SAHIH hadith that is not my problem.
Narrated 'Aisha: "She used to ask Abu Bakr for her share from the property of Allah's Apostle which he left at Khaibar, and Fadak, and his property at Medina (devoted for charity)..." Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 53, Number 325
...And because it's revenues was Sadaqa, he (salallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) was able to use it for his wives (and therefore, after 'Umar expelled them, he could give it to the wives of the Prophet), but not for himself nor his near relatives. (Bukhari v4 #306)
And this is why Abu Bakr said: "I will dispose with it as Allah's Apostle used to do." (Bukhari v5 #60)
Anyhoe, keep whining about a land that was taken from the Jews. You are only causing joy to those upon whom Allâh's wrath is upon.
Since sadakat was forbidden on the prophet (P) & his pure family (A.S) then why did Umar completely disregard the words of the Prophet (P) and give sadakat to Ali (A.S) & Abbas (R.A) the property at Medina (Bukhari V4, B53, N325). Was he not aware of this ruling? Even Abubakr was afraid of going astray by not following the traditions of the prophet (P)........
even though Aisha and all the other wives of the prophet (P) kept on begging him to give them their shares of inheritance from what the Prophet (P) left behind. Where all the Omilmumineens (mothers of all the believers) not aware of the hadith what we leave behind is only charity? Neither was Ali Fatima, Hassan & Hussain (the Ahlul Bayte Aliehum Assalam whom Allah has purified in the Quran 33:33), nor the house of Abbas (R.A)...........
It is only the nasibies that view the anger & oppression of the daughter of the Prophet (salallahu 'alayhi wa alehei wa sallam) as mere whining. To us there is only ONE siratal almustakeem( straight path), there is only ONE haqq (truth). It is either Fatima (A.S), daughter of the Prophet (P), Leader of all believing women in paradise (Bukhari V4, B56, N819), Hassan (A.S) & Hussain (A.S) the masters of all youth in paradise (Tirmidhi, V5, N3768) .......
& Imam Ali (A.S) who the prophet (P) said "Ali is with the truth and the truth is with Ali" Jama Tirmidhi, V 2 pg 573 Ch "Manaqib 'Ali". OR on the other side we have Umar & Abubakr, the ones whom ALLAH has reveled a verse about their disrespect in the presence of the prophet (Quran 49:2) (Bukhari V6, B 60, N 368).
I seek refuge in Allâh from slandering the blessed Household of the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam)
Would you do the same?
My point being...
YOU have been whining about a land that was taken from the Jews 1400 years ago, and therefore, YOU are causing joy to those whom Allâh cursed and upon whom Allâh's wrath is upon.
Ain't no suprise to me, considering that the founder of your religion was a crypto-Jew.
May Allâh cause the Râfidites (who die upon Rafd) to be resurrected with them.
I seek refuge in Allâh from slandering those whom Allâh promised Jannah.
We do not believe that the Sahaba are infallible, nor that they are protected from minor or major sins
However, we believe that they CANNOT lie about the Prophet (salallahu 'alayhi wa sallam)
And obviously, if you know the defintion of a "Sahabi" according to us, then you might understand. (for example, even though Abdullâh ibn Ubayy was among Ashâbu Muhammad, we don't consider him a Sahabi)
Sayyida 'Aisha did not ask about it, because she was aware of the saying of the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) (or refrained from asking about it after she became aware of it) [Bukhari vol.8 bk.80 #719 - #722]
Anyhoe, you can't use that argument for two reasons:
Firstly, it is established from Shi'a Hadith that : "Prophets did not leave Dinars nor Dirhams as inheritance, but they left knowledge." ...
Umar placed the burden of responsibility upon them under the condition that they "would manage it in the same way as Allah's Apostle used to, and as Abu Bakr used to do, and as I have done since I was in charge of it.'" [ibid #365]
You know, it is much easier for you to say:
"We hate Abu Bakr for not giving concessions to disobey the Prophet" considering the apparent fact that you haven taken Sayyida Fatima as a goddess besides Allâh.
Firstly>> Why cut and paste? I copied the hadith from bukhari and i pasted it & I asked my question underneath the hadith is there anything wrong with that? would you rather me type in the hadith letter by letter, what is it that made you take offence? And Alhamdulila I have read the full hadith but i could not paste the entire hadith since i am only allowed 500 letters in my comment box.
فأما الثلاث اللاتي وددت أني تركتهن، فوددت أني لم أكشف بيت فاطمة عن شيء وإن كانوا قد غلقوه على الحرب، ووددت أني لم أكن حرقت الفجاءة السلمي وأني كنت قتلته سريحاً أو خلّيته نجيح
the brother is a bit worng. the prophet passed the knowledge to all the companions and our prophet did not have the power to put anything in any ones heart. Allah can only control your heart. Our propher pbuh was a messenger to all.
Gayism is the only way to overcome the fatal problem which is WOMEN and only Women.Look at our women who always refuse to do sex with us,All the time they make new excuses.And look at the result after sex with them,they got pregnant and produce more females on our head(curse upon them)
Now in our Wahabizm we got the solution of this worst problem.Sayedna Abu Bakar Sideek(ra) says "Gayism is the only way to make a world without Women which will be more calm and Peaceful to live in"
You shia kafir Look at our filthy women,on the day of Eid ul Adha I gave them Meat and other ingredients to make Kebab and Biryani for my Abdur Rehman but u know what the hell they did? They not only refused to make but they throw the Meat out of the house and said "Go back to be fucked by Abdur Rehman,We r not your Khansama".Now i am sure that Sayedna Abu bakar Sideek(ra) was also the victim of Women thats why he started Gayism and shown us this way to overcome these filthy creatures(Women).
I hav uploaded some latest videos of my Madarsa in which u can see our new students enjoying the Sunnet of Sayedna Abu Bakar Sideek(ra) that is real pleasure of life.
All of u can find me their enjoying with Abdur Rehman.
All the credit goes to my Abdur Rehman who give us permission to make these videos of our Madarsa and training session.
All of u r invited to join us free of charge because it is all about our Wahabizm.
To provide a solid proof of this fact (i.e. that Shimr was a Shia), we refer to the esteemed and classical Shia scholar, Al-Qummi. Al-Qummi, author of the famous book Mafaatihul-Jinaan, writes in his book: I say, Shimr was in the forces of Ameer al-Mumineen on the Day of Siffin. (Al-Qummi, Safinatun-Najaat, vol.4, p. 492, Chapter Sheen Followed by Meem).
Shimr lain was not only shia but also real nephew of umul banin, wife of ali.
are you spreading your nasibi lies here as well. What is it about Imam Ali (3) & his family that you people hate so much. It is because of them that we are even guided. He is the sword of Allah in every battle where we seen your khalifas run like cowards. & inshalla like your khalifas ran you are also beginning to hide in your holes of ignorance. Alhamdullia it is the age of information & people are seeing the oppression done to alul bayte by your khalifas of ignorance.
When we point out that the Prophet married two of his daughters to 'Uthman, they work hard to "prove" they were not his real daughters.
Likewise, they worked hard to "disprove" 'Umar's marriage to the grand-daughter of the Prophet, Umm Kulthum bint Fatima.
Those who wiped the floor with the Romans and the Persians did not flee from any battlefield. This and the myth of the oppression of the Ahl al-Bayt thrives in Shi'a imagination only!
History clearly shows that it was umar & abi bakr that cowardly ran away at the battle of kaibar until the prophet finally had to say"Tomorrow I will give the flag to somebody who will be given victory (by Allah) and who loves Allah and His Apostle and is loved by Allah and His Apostle." & again none other Ali(3) gave victory to the Muslim's. During the life of the prophet (P) & after, directly or indirectly, it is none other then Ali(3) the held the flag of Islam, not even a comparison here.
Again, this only exists in Shi'a imagination, and the fact that you don't provide daleel, only confirms this!
I've read somewhere (Insha'allah, if i find it, i'll post the reference), that Imâm 'Ali said that the bravest of the Muslims was Abu Bakr.
And i'll repeat it again, the Muslims who vanquished the Persian Majûsi Empire and who broke the back of the Roman Christian Empire were no cowards, nor hypocrites.
Oh for sure, yes indeed that is one of my top ten favorite fabricated hadith about Imam Ali (A.S) saying the Abubakr was the bravest in the whole universe... actually he said that hadith right after he called Abubakr & Umar both SINFULL TREACHEROUS DISHONEST LIARS (Muslim B 019, N 4349). And you say we have a wild imaginationseriously you want more daleels. Why dont you show us one DALEEL of umar & abubakrs bravery DURING the life time of the Prophet (salalahu alayhi wa alehei wa sallam).
The mere fact that these two men were those who were mainly responsible for the downfall of the two greatest empires of the ancient world, should be sufficient as a proof of their bravery, at least for those who have an ounce of intellect.
Anyhoe, while the Prophet was praying in Mecca, a man came a started strangling the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam)
And when Abu Bakr saw this, he rushed towards him and pushed him away from the Prophet and said: ...
... "Do you want to kill a man just because he says, 'My Lord is Allah?'" Bukhari vol.5 #195
Or during the battle of Hunain, when many Muslims fled the battlefield, Ibn Ishâq and others relate that among those who bravely stood besides the Prophet were Abu Bakr and Umar.
Likewise during the Battle of Uhud, according to the best of my knowledge, when they were called to battle, they answered the call, and remained steadfast upon Allâh's Path.
And after the Prophet's lifetime, made history when they fought the apostate followers of Musaylimah and other false Prophets, and the negators of Zakat, and wiped the floor with the Persians and the Romans.
If this ain't bravery, then i don't know what is.
you maybe more religious than me, but for you to make a powerful argument hit home, you have to take the argument of your interlocutor to the logical extreme to show how silly it is.
& Alhamdullilah i respect & cherish that name, I am a "rafid", a rejector of the false khalifas that you try to shove down our throats. & you in the same sense are a nasibi, a person that loves & cherishes the people that have oppressed, murdered, robbed, slandered the family of the prophet (Ahlul Bayte). Who the prophet said about them "I am leaving you two weighty things, if you follow them you will never go astray, they are the Qur'an and my Ahlul'bayt". A mutawatir hadith.
Well, Allâh says that whoever follows the Muhajireen and the Ansar, Allâh will be pleased with them (as He was pleased with the Muhajireen and the Ansâr) and cause them to enter Jannah. [9.100]
The family of the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) was a heavy burden upon the Muslim community, and that's why the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) repeated thrice: "Udhakkarukum Allâha fee Ahl al-Baytee -- I remind you (of your duties) to the members of my family." (Sahih Muslim #5920)
The only BURDEN on the Muslim community was the false khalifas that caused division within Islam while the prophet (P) was on his death bed & after his (P) death. And this verse you quoted from surat 9:100. What does that have to do with the sahaba? It sais: The first and foremost FROM the muhajareen & ansar. Now you are going way out of context.
Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, "Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from me, whereupon I will say, 'My companions!' Then it will be said, 'You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you." (Bukhari V8 B76 N584)
After a mischievous statement of Abdullah ibn Salul reached the Prophet, 'Umar went to the Prophet and said: "O Allah's Apostle! Let me chop off the head of this hypocrite!", whereupon he replied to 'Umar: "Leave him, lest the people say Muhammad kills his companions." Bukhari, vol.6 #430
Stick to Islam and the Quran. That is the Truth. Enough with this Shia and Sunni nonsense. Enough with these interpretations that mean nothing. Like this man is saying what Allah (swt) put in the heart of the prophet He put in the heart of Abu Baker. How does he know that?! Amazing things that us Muslims come up with sometimes. Stick to the Word of Allah! Stick to the Quran! It is the Only Perfect Truth and Guide.
Wasn't it Abu Bakr who told the Muslims where to bury the Prophet (saw) ?
The Prophet passed away on a Monday and was buried the next day.
The reason for this was because it was simply impossible for all the Muslims to pray over him simultaneously, they had to pray in groups, and it was not untill all Muslims had prayed over the Prophet, that he was buried.
Abu Bakr and Umar might not have been present when the Prophet's body was being washed, but they were present during the funeral.
I hav uploaded some latest videos of my Madarsa in which u can see our new batch is enjoying the Sunnet of Sayedna Abu Bakar Sideek(ra) that is real pleasure of life.
All of u can find me their enjoying with Abdur Rehman.
All the credit goes to my Abdur Rehman who give us permission to make this extra ordinary Rocking Video of our Madarsa and training session.
All of u r invited to join us free of charge because it? is all about our Wahabizm.
O people, I had permitted you Mutah before, [but now] whoever of you has any part in it currently must part with her, and do not take back anything which you may have given them, as Allah Exalted and Majestic has forbidden it until the day of resurrection. [Muslim, Abu Dawood, Ibn Majah, Nasa`i, and Darimi]
NINJASWORD1, BEFORE BLAMING EVERY THING ON UMAR (RA), READ THE REAL HISTORY AND NOT THAT HISTORY INVENTED BY ENEMIES OF ISLAM AND ENEMIES OF SAHABAS.
When Ali was given the Caliphate, he thanked Allah Most High and praised Him and said:
O people, the Messenger of Allah had permitted Mutah three times then forbade it. I swear by Allah, ready to fulfil my oath, that if I find any person who engages in temporary marriage without having ratified this with a proper marriage, I will have him lashed 100 stripes unless he can bring two witnesses to prove that the Messenger had permitted it after forbidding it. [Ibn Majah]
(ii) banned by prophet,saw, himself on the eve of khyber battle. abu bakr, umar,usman and ali (ra) only carried the orders of Allah revealed on last prophet,saw. why ali did not reinstate mutah during his (ali) khilafat? who stopped ali (ra) from doing so? if mutah is halal, tell me how many imams of shias or their children have done mutah? i dont know why shias have strange habit of putting every blame on three khulfas whereas ali did not change a single law of his preceeding khulfas.
(i) ninjasword1, first of all make it clear that umar (ra) did not introduce Tarawih prayers. muslims prayed in Prophet,saw, life also and prophet,saw, also prayed salat Tarawih but later left and told clearly sahabs that if they may wish they may continue or leave it. even ali (ra) did not banned salat tarawih during his (ali ) khilafat. if it was against orders of Allah, it means ali (ra) is also equally respoonsible that ali (ra) allowed an unislamic act during his khilafat.
Prophet Muhammad (SAW) ''Fear from Allah! Fear from Allah! Do not criticise my Companions [R.A] after me; one who loved them, he/she loved them due to once's love with me; and the one who kept malice with them, he/she kept it due to once's animosity with me; and the one who annoyed them, he/she annoyed me; and the one who annoyed me, he/she annoyed Allah [S.W.T]; and the one who annoyed Allah [S.W.T], its soon that Allah [S.W.T] will punish him/her". [Tirmizi, vol#2 pg#249]
And regarding Fadak I have alreadyproved (checky my mail) from your books that Prophet gifted the Bagh-e-Fadak to Fatima on the order of Allah"And give to the near of kin his due and (to) the needy and the wayfarer, and do not squander wastefully." (7:26)
This is also confirmed by dozens of your scholars in their books.
Because IF it was gift, then that means it is already in her possession during the lifetime of the Prophet! (the land of Fadak was captured from the Jews on the 7th year of Hijra)
The fact is, Fatima and others from the family of the Prophet came to ask for the INHERITANCE.
It is for this reason that ignorant Shi'ites accuse Abu Bakr of fabricating this hadith: "The Prophets don't leave behind (material) INHERITANCE, what they leave behind is charity."
The irony is that there are sound narrations from Shi'a collections that confirm this saying!
Even al-Khomeini uses this hadith in his book, "Islamic Government" and says: "The links in the chain of transmission of this tradition are all trustworthy; in fact, Ibrāhīm ibn Hāshim, father of Ali ibn Ibrāhīm, is not moderately trustworthy but outstandingly so."
Yet YOU continue to indirectly accuse Abu Bakr of lying upon the Prophet!
The fact is that she did not speak to Abu Bakr and it was her will that those have hurted her should not participate in her funeral (This is confirmed by your hundereds of scholars including Bukahri).
Remeber What Prphet said "Fatima is part of mine, one who hurts Fatima, hurts me and one who hurts me,hurts Allah"
Moreover, you do know you're presenting Fatima al-Zahrâ as a selfish woman, who didn't want the land of Fadak to be given in charity, as to benefit those Muslims who are less fortunate!
This is the reality of those who claim to be the followers of the Ahlel Bayt!
Lastly, without blindly and copying (as usual)..
Tell me, when 'Ali became the Khalifa, WHY didn't he return the land of Fadak to it's "rightfull owners"?
If some one seizes your property and house and if you go to court to complain, would you be called as selfish?? The fact is that Fadak was in possesion of Syeda Fatima and her first plea was that Fadak is his property and when they refused to give she was asked to rpovide witness.Her witness were Ali,Hassan and Hussain. Your number of scholars have confirmed Prophet had gifted Fadak to Fatima (Jalaudin Syuti,Fakhrudin Razi, Ibn-e-Kathir and many others)
The fact that YOU on more than one occassion, blindly copy and pasted from deceivers who presented well-known Shi'ites (al-Mas'udi and Ya'qubi) as "Sunni historians" and NOW, "your great ulema" referring to the Shi'i leaning Ibn Abi al-Hadid al-Mu'tazili who was well-know as the one who wasted his time by writing a worthless commentary on a useless book (Najh al-Balagha).
This pretty much given us an idea what "proof" you have in store for us!
It is worthless to talk to you. I have given you reference of Ibn-e-Hajar Maki,Jalaludin Syuttii,Fakhr al-Razi,al-Tabari, Ibn Kathir,by Ibn al-Athir and many others. Are they Shiaa??
I am wasting my time to discuss these things with the bigget Jahil in the earth. I never used abusive language for you but you always did. This is the chracter of all the Wahabis.
Every one knows who is agent of the jews. (Saudi,Egypt,JordanUAE).Now Go to hell.
I will mail you today the Complete Part of "Wives of the Prophet not included in Ahulbay" and also Fadak (will prove from Quran and your books that Fadak was Usurped). I would request you to read objectively and independently). I am not writting here complete details of above on the comment section because shortage of time
The fact that the gender in later part of Verse 33:33 is switched from feminine to masculine has led the majority of Sunni commentators to believe that the last part was revealed for Imam Ali Fatimah Hasan and Husain as Ibn Hajar al-Haythami indicated: Based on the opinion of the majority ofSunnicommentators the saying of Allah :"Verily Allah intends to.. (the last sentence of the verse 33:33)was revealed for Ali Fatimah Hasanand Husain because of the usage of masculine in the word"Ankum"
10) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Also al-Tabari quotes Umm Salama saying:
I said, "O Prophet of Allah! Am I not also one of your Ahlul-Bayt?" I swear by the Almighty that the Holy Prophet did NOT grant me any distinction and said: "You have a good future."
Sunni reference: Tafsir al-Tabari, v22, p7 under the commentary of verse 33:33
(I have got dozens of references of your books, however I have included only few references here, if you wish I can mail to you)
8)Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
In the tradition of al-Hakim the wording the last question and answer is as follows:
Umm Salama said: "O Prophet of Allah! Am I not one of the members of your family?" The Holy Prophet replied: "You have a good future but only these are the members of my family. O Lord! The members of my family are more deserving."
Sunni reference: al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v2, p416
7) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
It is interesting to see that Aisha, the wife of the Prophet (PBUH&HF) is the narrator of the above tradition, and she herself is testifying that Ahlul- Bayt are the above-mentioned individuals (i.e., Imam Ali, Fatimah, al-Hasan, and al-Husain, may the blessing of Allah be upon them all).
6) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
2.The purification sentence in Quran (the last sentence of Verse 33:33) was revealed for the virtue of the above-mentioned individuals, and NOT for the wives of the Prophet (PBUH&HF).
Muslim (the Author) did not put any other tradition in this section. If the author of Sahih Muslim believed that the wives of the Prophet were included in Ahlul-Bayt, he would have quoted some traditions about them in this section.
5) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Sunni reference:
•Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61
One can see that the author of Sahih Muslim confirms that:
1.Imam Ali, Fatimah, al-Hasan, and al-Husain are the Ahlul-Bayt,
4) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
(Remaining Part of Hadith)
then Ali came and the Prophet entered him to the cloak as well. Then the Prophet recited: "Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul-Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification (the last sentence of Verse 33:33)."
3) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Narrated Aisha:
One day the Prophet (PBUH&HF) came out afternoon wearing a black cloak (upper garment or gown; long coat), then al-Hasan Ibn Ali came and the Prophet accommodated him under the cloak, then al-Husain came and entered the cloak, then Fatimah came and the Prophet entered her under the cloak,
2) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Note that the word "Rijs" in the above verse has got the article "al-" at its beginning which makes the word universal. Thus "al-Rijs" means "EVERY KIND of impurity". Also at the end of the verse, Allah states "and purify you a PERFECT purification." The word "perfect" comes from the emphasis of "Tat'hiran". This is the only place in Quran that Allah uses the emphasis of "PERFECT purification".
1) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Evidence From Quran
as "Purification Verse" (Ayah al-Tat'hir):
"Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul-Bayt), and purify you with a perfect purification". (Quran, the last sentence of Verse 33:33)
Your second lie is also caught regarding Wives of the Prophet included in AhulbaytRead Sahih Muslim Book 31number 5923For your convinence
" Aren't the wives (of the Holy Prophet) included amongst the members of his house hold? Thereupon he said: No by Allah, a woman lives with a man (as his wife) for a certain period; he then divorces her and she goes back to her parents and to her people; the members of his household include his ownself and his kith and kin (who are related to him by blood)
I gave you reference of Sahih Muslim Hadith which specifically states that "wives of the Prophet are not included in AhulBayt". Either accept that Hadith Sahih Muslim Book 31number 5923 is correct or accept that Sahih Muslims if full of contradiction.
On this issue again I will give you evidences from your own books and Holy Quran that wives of the Prophet are not included in Ahulbayt.
It is simply a hadith which was beautifully narrated by 'Aisha (radhiallâhu 'anh) to show the deep love the Prophet had for 'Ali, Fâtima, Hasan and Hussain, and so that Allâh may also purify them when he recited half of âyât!.
I repeat, it is by DEFAULT that the wives are the Ahle Bayt, read it for yourself. (33.28-34)
It is only the hatred that you have for the family of the Prophet that prevents you from accepting the obvious!
Then why the prophet not allowed Hazrat Umm-e-Salma to enter into Chadar? Verse (33:33) is specifically addressed to these five persons even Aisha has confirmed and number of your Ulema have confirmed it.
You want another proof Sura-e-Aal-e-Imran Ayat No.60 (Mubahila) and the Prophet was ordered by Allah to take the members of household with himself for Mubahila. Only these four persons accompanied the Prophet.
Try to understand the difference between the two...
ALLÂH revealed those âyâts (33.28-34) in regards to the wives of the Prophet.
This is something agreed upon, especially when read in context.
THE PROPHET used half- of that âyât in respect to his daughter, son-in-law and grand-sons, which shows the deep love he has for them and desire for them to be purified.
The former does not negate the latter, nor does the latter negate the former!
(33:33) is totally separate. Remmber usage of masculine gender in the word "Ankum" . Gibraeil recited this ayat and brought the message of Allah that Allah intends to purify the AhulBayt.
Not allowing Hazrat Umm-e-Salma into the Chadar is strong proof that wives are not included AhulBayt and purification is refered to these five which is also confimed by your scholars.
Not taking the wives to Mubahila is another proof. Prophet said O Allah! "These are members of my household"
That's false, because the latter part of verse 33 is in the masculine sense BECAUSE the one who is adressed is the HEAD of the household, the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam).
In the Arabic language, if there is a group with only one man but many women, the group is to be adressed in the masculine sense.
Let me say it again, the former does not negate the latter, nor does the latter negate the former...
The ahadiths about Umm Salama and the Cloak are no doubt weak.
The stronger version in Sahih Muslim makes more sense, and there is no mentioning of the wives going about to enter the cloak, because this would mean that they were unaware that they were the ones whom Allâh revealed those âyâts in the first place.
ahadiths about Umm Salama is also narrated in Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 351,663, even your radical Molvis have never said that this hadith is weak. All the sunni scholar has confirmed that this hadith is aunthentic inclding Ibn-e-Athir,Syuti, Tabari,Fakhrudin Razi, Ibn-e-Kathir.
What can I do for you?? and what about Mubahila????
It's irrelevant whether he (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) would bring his 9 wives with him, the fact of the matter is that they were the reason of revelation. (33:28-34)
Moreover, according Asbâb al-Nuzûl of al-Wâhidi:
"The Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, went and brought al-Hasan, al-Husayn, Fatimah and all his family and children...."
It doesn't mean it is Sahih, but this shows that there are ahadith that affirm the general meaning of âyât al-Mubâhala...
Remebr Umar Bin Abdul Aziz handed over Fadak to the descedants of Hazrat Fatima (A.S). It was seized again afater his rule but when Mamun Rashid became Caliph he again handed over the propeerty to the descedents of Fatima Zehra.
Now it is your choice to decide who was correct either Bibi Fatima or Abu Bakr.
'Umar ibn Abdel 'Aziz RETURNED it to the way it was dealt with by the Prophet, Abu Bakr Umar, Uthman and 'Ali after Marwan or another Ummayad King changed it!
It might me part of YOUR religion to disobey Allâh and His Messenger in obedience to the Creation (even if it be the family of the Prophet), but NOT our religion, and especially not the religion of Sayyidinâ Abu Bakr al-Siddiq!
About Zakariyya's invocation the Holy Qur'an says: "And Zakariyya, when he cried to his Lord: 'O my Lord, leave me not childless, though Thou art the best of inheritors.' So we responded to him and gave him Yahya." (21: 89,90)
War lasted for 33 days and Hezbollah was victorious with the help of Allah. Every one accepted that Israel was defeated. Even arab countries who were defeated said Hezbollah has saved us from insult which we had in 1967. Your arab countries are the biggest collabrators of USA (Saudi Arabia,Egypt,Jordan,UAE).
Regarding successor of Prophet, I will send two or three mails to both of you (M.Ahmad and kokei) to prove that Prophet did declare Imam Ali as his successor. But I will put one condition, Before start reading my mails, you will have to be independent not as rigid sunni (not willing to accept anything) and read the entire mails. This is my only condition.
It is surprising, as all your historians and have recorded in their authentic books, that Caliph Abu Bakr, at the time of his death, asked Uthman to write down what he (Abu Bakr) was saying. It was his will. He wrote down whatever Abu Bakr dictated to him. Umar and others were also present on this occasion. No one objected. Umar did not say: "The Book of Allah is sufficient for us; we do not need Abu Bakr's will." But he did not allow the Holy Prophet of Allah to write his will.
He used to fall un-conscious because of the severity of the fever he was suffering from (while Abu Bakr and Umar weren't), and when 'Umar saw the Prophet in that state, he then said: "Verily Allahs Messenger is deeply afflicted with pain. You have the Quran with you. The Book of Allah is sufficient for us." (Muslim bk.13 #4016]
But since you are filled with hatred, you can't recognize compassion (from a Sahabi)...
You REALLY believe that 'Umar would stay put in one place for OVER 70 hours (inspite of evidences that go against it)!!
Allâhul Musta'an!
Blind partisanship does make one look silly!
Anyhoe, Ibn 'Abbas continued...
"He (the Prophet) said:...I make a WILL about three things (i.e verbally): (one of them was) Turn out the polytheists from the territory of Arabia..." (ibid #4014)
gulmurtuza, where have you disappeared, why are you not replying. i dont know why shias try to prove that ali (ra) was a coward by inventing non sense and unbelievable stories.
There is shiaa sunni munazra on this topic alone "Attacking Fatima A.S). For your convinence go to the following link and watch all 13 videos of this munazra
giant lmao, Ali was the greastest muslam after the prophet. seriously man go and get some knowlge b4 ur open ur mouth.
Abu Baker was nothing more than snitch umar was an alcoholic , sunnis get it right , get it throught ur heads ahyal abait have and own hight rank then wat u beleive in, fu#kn wahabbies
step, if ali (ra) has so much divine qualities which shia-taans believe then why not Allah appointed ali (ra) as a prophet? abu bakr was nothing, that is why he was praised by Allah in Quran Majeed, and last prophet,saw, made him father in law and ali (ra) made him brother in law.Umar was alcoholic that is why he was father in law of last prophet,saw and son in law of ali (ra). Allah, last prophet,saw, and ali (ra) are wrong but these shia-taans followers of abdullah bin saba are right.
(i) gulmurtaza, shias believe that all sahabas were cowards and only ali was brave and when sahabas ran away in wars only ali was sufficient for kuffars. then how it is possible that two or three of more than it people surronded ali and ali remained silent and ali did not save fatima. it means shias believe that ali was a coward because ali did not save fatima and remained silent. whereas we muslims believe that ali was tiger of Allah. then why ali married widow of jaffar bin abu talib to
Imam Ali was surronded by dozens of people. How come even a brave person over power dozens of people. I have not quoted refrences of shiaa books these are books of Ahle-eSunnat. Even if you do not acknowledge about that attack, Abu bakr himself has acknowledged and regreted "Abu Bakr said (on his death bed): "I wish I had not searched for Fatimah's house, and had not sent men to harass her"
Sunni references History of Ya'qubi, v2, pp 115-116 Ansab Ashraf, by al-Baladhuri, v1, pp 582,586
(ii) abu bakr and name of that widow was asma bint umais and after death of abu bakr, ali married himself with that widow of abu bakr. ali married his own daughter umme kulsoo bint ali to umar. then shias believe that ali is imam (rather above all prophets) and he knows the knowledge of future. why imamat of ali failed and why ali did not know that three khulfas will beat and rather kill his wife fatima, as shias blame. it means what shias believe then they themselves refute it.first shias prove
Shias do not believe that all sahabas are bad but those hurted prophet and left him alone in the battlefields. We do not call them sahaba. Who prevented Prohphet from writting his will for Ummah. Prophet angrily ordered him to get out of his romm Again from Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 70, Number 573 Read this. Who left the prophet in the battle of Uhud?? Again I can give you reference from your books
(iii) that ali was coward because he did not save fatima.the second point shias themselves prove that ali was not imam and neither he had knowledge of future because he did not know that three khulfas will beat and kill his wife. if those three khulfas killed fatima, as shias blame, then why ali married widow of jaffar bin abu talib to abu bakr? why ali married his daughter to umar(i can prove this marriage from shia books)?why ali kept his five sons names on three khulfas?will you reply please?
"Ali ibn Hussain ibn Ali al-Mas'ûdi...He has a book about IMAMATE and others, from them a book in proving the Wasiyyah of Ali ibn Abi Talib(a) and he is the author of the book "Murûj al-Dhahab". (Khulasât p.186)
On al-Ya'qubi, see:
h t t p : / / w w w . islamtoday . c o m / s h o w _ d e t a i l _ s e c t i o n . c f m ? q _ i d = 1190 & m a i n _ c a t _ i d = 2
Who prevented Prophet from writting his will for Ummah. Person was Umar and Prophet ordered him to get out of his room Refer Sahih Bukahri Volume 7, Book 70, Number 573:
The Final will of the Prophet for his Ummah was executed by none other than Umar al-Faruq, when he (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) ordered that no two religions can co-exist in the Arabian Peninsula.
This is not the answer. Why did he prevent Prophet from writting his will for Ummah so that they do not go astray. Prophet got angry and ordered him to leave his home Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 76, Number 578 I would advise you to read first and then respond.
Why did Umar prevent Prophet from writting his will for Ummahr so that they do not go astary. Probably he was afraid that Prophet may write about his successor. Prophet declared Imam Ali as his successor even in his first speech
Sunni References:
History of al-Tabari, English version, v6, pp 88-91
History of Ibn Athir, v2, p62
History of Ibn Asakir, v1, p85
Tafsir al-Durr al-Manthoor, by al-Hafidh Jalaluddin al-Suyuti, v5, p97
(5) Tafsir al-Khazin, by Ala'uddin al-Shafi'i, v3, p371
Where does it say "'Umar prevented Prophet from writing"?
It just says that 'Umar said: "The Prophet is seriously ill and you have the Qur'an; so the
Book of Allah is enough for us." (he said this after the Prophet lost consciousness)
Besides, you really expect me to believe that 'Umar (or anyone else) would prevent the Prophet from writing this "indispensable" will for over 70 hours? (i.e from Thursday to Monday)
I hope not, because even râfidi narrations tell us that his near relatives...
You said that Umar did not prevent from writting. I am quoting Sahih BukhariVolume 7, Book 70, Number 573Allah's Apostle said, "Go away!" Narrated 'Ubaidullah: Ibn 'Abbas used to say,
"It was very unfortunate that Allah's Apostle was prevented from writing that statement for them because of their disagreement and noise."
Ibn-e-Abbas confirms that Prophet was prevented from writting and Prophet said to them "Go away".
Ibn-e-Abbas used to cry about this unfortunate event.
WHERE does it say that "'Umar prevented the Prophet from writing"?
Put on your glasses:
"It was very unfortunate that Allah's Apostle was prevented from writing that statement for them because of THEIR disagreement and noise."
"During his illness, the Prophet of Allah asked for a pen and paper. Since he was then undergoing the intensity of his illness, Umar intervened to say that he must not be put in any trouble for the Quran is enough for us all - as he has already said...
...But some of the companions were in favor of letting him dictate. The Prophet disliked the clamor of voices and asked the people to leave. At the time, he was suffering from a violent headache and this was the reason why Umar had suggested not to trouble him in any way. When his (the Prophets) pain had subsided a little, he called the people in and [narrated three things]
(Tarîkh al-Islâm, Vol.1, p.244-245)
As mentioned earlier, WHO executed the will of the Prophet to expel the pagans?
This is fabricated hadith. You will try everything to defend him because you have blind faith on these companions. If they were really sincere with the Prophet, why did they leave the Prophet alone in the Batlle of Uhud and Hunain and exposed him to danger.Don't forget to watch Munazra on Attacking Fatima. If you do not have time watch at least video13 our Aalim has given dozen refernce of your books regarding Abu Bakr's acknowledgement of attacking Fatima.Even it is narrated in Kanzul Ummal.
Mr. Kokei I referd to hadith which you anrrated that "Prophet gave verbal instruction" This is total lie. Do you want to know the reality of your books? I am going to mail you few links because I do not want to expose your books in public .
What about Battle of Khyber and Hunain? Why did Umar flee in the battale of khyber without giving a fight? and Finally, Prophet had to finally call Imam Ali in this war. Finally Muslims forces got victory because of Imam Ali.
You people are the biggest Jahils. You people have history of denying facts. You people are like Abu Jahl whom Prophet showed many Mojizat but he did not accept Islam. I have given answers to each of your question. I have sent you links of videos to show reality of your Sahih Sitta in which your scholars have included fabricated traditions which insult the Prophet. Any way, if you do not want me to comment, I will not. But if you insult Shiaas (truste followers of Prophet) I will hit you back.
No one needs to insult shias. Allah has himself hit this satanic firqa which is divided into more than 40 firqas like asna ashri, ismailis, nusseri, zaidia, kissania,bihai, druz, alwite, qaddaya and many more. Allah has never allowed this firqa to dominate Makkah and Madinah since the dawn of islam till todate i.e. for the last 1450 year. there is no compulsion for muslims to pay salats behind shias but shias had to pay salat behind sunni rather wahabi imams in Makkah and Madina. think about it.
You people are the biggest Shitaans in this world. You people are divided into dozens of sects Hanafi, Shafai,Maliki, Hanbali,Ahl-e-Hadith,Qadri, Wahabi,Mutazali,Qadyani,Tableeghi etc.
And remember, you people were defeated in 1967 war.Five sunni contries attacked Israel simultaneously and the result was, half of their territory was captured by Israel. But when Hezbollah had war with jews in 2006.
One of the arguments of Fatima rejecting the hadith was that, if the hadith were true, then why were there so many verses about the inheritances of the prophets. She said: "At one place the Holy Qur'an says, 'And Solomon was David's heir.'"(27:16)
About the prophet Zakariyya the Holy Qur'an says: "Therefore grant me from thyself an heir, who shall inherit of me and inherit (also) of the house of Jacob." (19,5-6)
Yes, Sulaymân inherited Prophethood from his father Dawud, and knowledge!
Thank you for further proving this by mentioning the du'â of Zakariyya (a.s), since Yahyâ inherited from his father Prophethood and knowledge!
This is further confirmed by a Hadith reported in Usûl al-Kâfi that the Prophet said: "The prophets did not leave a single dinār or dirham; instead they left knowledge."
Imâm al-Khomeini declares this hadith Sahih in his "Islamic Government". [Section 3, Footnote 177]
O Jahil! Put on double glasses before commenting. Prophetood is not inherited ask your molvis whether Prophetood is inherited. I am sure he will slap you. Prophet is appointed by Allah.
Solomon inherited all the wealth, Property and kingdom ask your molvis. Zakiriya pleaded to Allah to give him son who will inherit his property because he feared that his enemies will seize his property after his death. Therefore, this hadith is totally rejected.
Prophet peace be upon him said "Allah is my maula, I am the maula of all of you, and whosoever's maula I am Ali is his maula. He is the wali of every momin after me. Abubakr and umar said mubarak first to Áli. So the master of abubakr and umar was ali.
dunyazadi 2 years ago
Ali is the Maula (Master, guide, friend, superior) of Abubakr and all the momineen. The prophet peace be upon him said that Ällah is my maula, I am the maula of you all, and whosoever's maula I am, Ali is his maula and wali after me...So Mohammad is moula kainat, and in his wirasat Ali is maula kainat. Then the prophet raised his hands and prayed Ö Allah be the Wali of him who has Ali as his wali and be the enemy of him who has Ali as his enemy.
dunyazadi 2 years ago
don't try to make abu bakar as a hero of islam infact he was and his two successors umer and usman were khayen. when RASUL ALLAH(s.a.w) gave the qutba hajjat ul wida and told muslims that ALLAH Is mola and i'm your mola and whome belive it ALI is his mola and RASUL ALLAH(s.a.w) says i'm leaving two precious things with you, one is kitab ALLAH and other is my AHELEBAIT. don't leave these two things. these will take you to paradise otherwise you will lose the path of truth.
netfreak92 2 years ago
the chant playing in the background is rather distracting.
ASCENDED5 2 years ago
The......... (When 'Umar became the Caliph) he gave the wives of the Prophet the option of either having the land and water as their shares, or carrying on the previous practice. Some of them chose the land and some chose the Wasqs, and 'Aisha chose the land.
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 39, Number 521
Please explain why is umar giving the wives of the prophet option of land when abu bakr denied Fatima (3) fadak. I thought that the prophets do not leave anything as inheritance?
jesusforislam 2 years ago
Why cut and paste?
That land (of Khaybar) - unlike Fadak - was still in the hands of Jews when the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) died
It was not untill 'Umar kicked them out that he gave Ummahât al-Mu'mineen a share of the land, and he only did this as a continuation of the tradition established by the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam)
Read the FULL hadith.
koekiedow 2 years ago
"Allah's Apostle gave the land of Khaibar to the Jews on the condition that they work on it and cultivate it, and be given half of its yield." Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 39, Number 524
"...The Prophet used to give his wives (from the land's yield) one hundred Wasqs each, eighty Wasqs of dates and twenty Wasqs of barley."
Ibid, Volume 3, Book 39, Number 521
You do the math...
koekiedow 2 years ago
It is clear that the prophet owned this land & he only allowed the jews to cultivate it & receive half the benefit. & not as you said above that the prophet gave the land to the jews. If there is a FALSE or contradicting in your SAHIH hadith that is not my problem.
Narrated 'Aisha: "She used to ask Abu Bakr for her share from the property of Allah's Apostle which he left at Khaibar, and Fadak, and his property at Medina (devoted for charity)..." Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 53, Number 325
jesusforislam 2 years ago
"Allah's Apostle gave the land of Khaibar to the Jews" (Bukhari v3 #524)
It was theirs on a certain condition, and therefore was not of the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam).
"These two properties (Khaybar and Fadak) are the Sadaqa which Allah's Apostle used to use for his expenditures and urgent needs." (Bukhari v4 #325)
...
koekiedow 2 years ago
...And because it's revenues was Sadaqa, he (salallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) was able to use it for his wives (and therefore, after 'Umar expelled them, he could give it to the wives of the Prophet), but not for himself nor his near relatives. (Bukhari v4 #306)
And this is why Abu Bakr said: "I will dispose with it as Allah's Apostle used to do." (Bukhari v5 #60)
Anyhoe, keep whining about a land that was taken from the Jews. You are only causing joy to those upon whom Allâh's wrath is upon.
koekiedow 2 years ago
Since sadakat was forbidden on the prophet (P) & his pure family (A.S) then why did Umar completely disregard the words of the Prophet (P) and give sadakat to Ali (A.S) & Abbas (R.A) the property at Medina (Bukhari V4, B53, N325). Was he not aware of this ruling? Even Abubakr was afraid of going astray by not following the traditions of the prophet (P)........
jesusforislam 2 years ago
even though Aisha and all the other wives of the prophet (P) kept on begging him to give them their shares of inheritance from what the Prophet (P) left behind. Where all the Omilmumineens (mothers of all the believers) not aware of the hadith what we leave behind is only charity? Neither was Ali Fatima, Hassan & Hussain (the Ahlul Bayte Aliehum Assalam whom Allah has purified in the Quran 33:33), nor the house of Abbas (R.A)...........
jesusforislam 2 years ago
Dont you think thats strange that only Umar & Abubakr remembered this hadith, or did they fabricate it?
jesusforislam 2 years ago
It is only the nasibies that view the anger & oppression of the daughter of the Prophet (salallahu 'alayhi wa alehei wa sallam) as mere whining. To us there is only ONE siratal almustakeem( straight path), there is only ONE haqq (truth). It is either Fatima (A.S), daughter of the Prophet (P), Leader of all believing women in paradise (Bukhari V4, B56, N819), Hassan (A.S) & Hussain (A.S) the masters of all youth in paradise (Tirmidhi, V5, N3768) .......
jesusforislam 2 years ago
& Imam Ali (A.S) who the prophet (P) said "Ali is with the truth and the truth is with Ali" Jama Tirmidhi, V 2 pg 573 Ch "Manaqib 'Ali". OR on the other side we have Umar & Abubakr, the ones whom ALLAH has reveled a verse about their disrespect in the presence of the prophet (Quran 49:2) (Bukhari V6, B 60, N 368).
jesusforislam 2 years ago
The last statement you made just proved my point.
Râfidites are an ignorant qawm, completely bereft of understanding!
Ask yourself this...
Did they intend to disrespect the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam)?
Considering your belief of them being hypocrites, yes.
In the same hadith it states:
"Since the revelation of this Verse, 'Umar used to speak in such a low tone that the Prophet had to ask him to repeat his statements."
Moreover, don't play the Asbâb al-Nuzûl-card...
koekiedow 2 years ago
I couldn't find the statement: "Ali is with the Truth" ['Ali ma'a al-Haqq] in Sunan/Jâmi' al-Tirmidhi.
There is a hadith in it that reads: "Oh Allâh, turn the truth with him wherever he turns/may be." [#3714] or something along these lines.
The author - after recording it - states: "This is a Ghareeb (strange/lone) Hadeeth."
Imam Ahmad says concerning Ghareeb ahadeeth: "...most of them are weak."
Shaykh al-Albani considers it extremely weak.
koekiedow 2 years ago
I seek refuge in Allâh from slandering the blessed Household of the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam)
Would you do the same?
My point being...
YOU have been whining about a land that was taken from the Jews 1400 years ago, and therefore, YOU are causing joy to those whom Allâh cursed and upon whom Allâh's wrath is upon.
Ain't no suprise to me, considering that the founder of your religion was a crypto-Jew.
May Allâh cause the Râfidites (who die upon Rafd) to be resurrected with them.
koekiedow 2 years ago
I seek refuge in Allâh from slandering those whom Allâh promised Jannah.
We do not believe that the Sahaba are infallible, nor that they are protected from minor or major sins
However, we believe that they CANNOT lie about the Prophet (salallahu 'alayhi wa sallam)
And obviously, if you know the defintion of a "Sahabi" according to us, then you might understand. (for example, even though Abdullâh ibn Ubayy was among Ashâbu Muhammad, we don't consider him a Sahabi)
koekiedow 2 years ago
Bullcrap!
Sayyida 'Aisha did not ask about it, because she was aware of the saying of the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) (or refrained from asking about it after she became aware of it) [Bukhari vol.8 bk.80 #719 - #722]
Anyhoe, you can't use that argument for two reasons:
Firstly, it is established from Shi'a Hadith that : "Prophets did not leave Dinars nor Dirhams as inheritance, but they left knowledge." ...
koekiedow 2 years ago
... [al-Kâfi vol.1 p.32 -- Chain authenticated by al-Khomeini, al-Islam (dot) org - "Islamic Government" - Section 3 (under link to footnote 177)]
The thought that the close relatives of the Prophet were unaware of this, does not negate this!
Secondly, a woman (according to Shi'a ahadith) cannot inherit land anyway. (Tahdhîb al-Ahkâm, vol.9 p.298 -- al-Istibsâr vol.4 p.152 -- al-Kâfi vol.7 p.127)
So why the fuss?!
koekiedow 2 years ago
Wrong!
Umar placed the burden of responsibility upon them under the condition that they "would manage it in the same way as Allah's Apostle used to, and as Abu Bakr used to do, and as I have done since I was in charge of it.'" [ibid #365]
You know, it is much easier for you to say:
"We hate Abu Bakr for not giving concessions to disobey the Prophet" considering the apparent fact that you haven taken Sayyida Fatima as a goddess besides Allâh.
I seek refuge in Allâh from Shirk!
koekiedow 2 years ago
Firstly>> Why cut and paste? I copied the hadith from bukhari and i pasted it & I asked my question underneath the hadith is there anything wrong with that? would you rather me type in the hadith letter by letter, what is it that made you take offence? And Alhamdulila I have read the full hadith but i could not paste the entire hadith since i am only allowed 500 letters in my comment box.
jesusforislam 2 years ago
What the fuck do sunnis know about the truth or about Islam? Their teachings are only about hatred, racism & anti-semetism. You evil worshipers!!
dewanadil99 2 years ago
Read these books,
تاريخ الطبري، ج2، ص 619، تاريخ الإسلام للذهبي، ج 3، ص 117، مجمع الزوائد، ج 5، ص 202، المعجم الكبير، ج 1، ص 62، كنز
irooni100 2 years ago
فأما الثلاث اللاتي وددت أني تركتهن، فوددت أني لم أكشف بيت فاطمة عن شيء وإن كانوا قد غلقوه على الحرب، ووددت أني لم أكن حرقت الفجاءة السلمي وأني كنت قتلته سريحاً أو خلّيته نجيح
irooni100 2 years ago
Go SHAVE your beard so that you can read some books.
irooni100 2 years ago
اللهم العن اول ظالم ظلم حق محمد وآل محمد وآخر تابع له علی ذالک اللهم العنهم جمیعا*****آمین یا ربلعآ لمین
irooni100 2 years ago
This guy is weak he cant speak, "professions"...look how he is dressed, he needs an italian tailor.
pradaman1999 2 years ago
Brothers we need to unite,, it's just one step away... Watch the video about SHIA SUNNI ISSUE on my page.
May Allah guide us..
slm
ToGathering 2 years ago 2
the brother is a bit worng. the prophet passed the knowledge to all the companions and our prophet did not have the power to put anything in any ones heart. Allah can only control your heart. Our propher pbuh was a messenger to all.
neo171171 2 years ago
Alhamdulilah, Abu Bakr's place is well known among the Umma. He who thinks different is misguided.
nabilino 2 years ago 11
what?
nabilino 2 years ago
what the hell is up with the damn music in the background? I was at this speech in chicago and there was no music there!
jumar1281 2 years ago
If you were at this speech, maybe you'd learn a thing or two about kind speech?
nabilino 2 years ago
@jumar1281 dun curse my brother. Islam do not consent that :)
zippo615 2 years ago
jumar 1281
its not a musin its a nasheed !
clbosa 2 years ago
their wasnt a mathab of shiah and sunnah one their was munafgeen in
Mohmeds(AS) army
hasseian313 2 years ago
may you burn in the worst of hells for saying that.
Ishaq91 2 years ago
Happy BAKRAEID
Gayism is the only way to overcome the fatal problem which is WOMEN and only Women.Look at our women who always refuse to do sex with us,All the time they make new excuses.And look at the result after sex with them,they got pregnant and produce more females on our head(curse upon them)
Now in our Wahabizm we got the solution of this worst problem.Sayedna Abu Bakar Sideek(ra) says "Gayism is the only way to make a world without Women which will be more calm and Peaceful to live in"
MuhammedAhmad1 2 years ago
You shia kafir Look at our filthy women,on the day of Eid ul Adha I gave them Meat and other ingredients to make Kebab and Biryani for my Abdur Rehman but u know what the hell they did? They not only refused to make but they throw the Meat out of the house and said "Go back to be fucked by Abdur Rehman,We r not your Khansama".Now i am sure that Sayedna Abu bakar Sideek(ra) was also the victim of Women thats why he started Gayism and shown us this way to overcome these filthy creatures(Women).
MuhammedAhmad1 2 years ago
KhushKhabri $ KhushKhabri $ KhushKhabri
I hav uploaded some latest videos of my Madarsa in which u can see our new students enjoying the Sunnet of Sayedna Abu Bakar Sideek(ra) that is real pleasure of life.
All of u can find me their enjoying with Abdur Rehman.
All the credit goes to my Abdur Rehman who give us permission to make these videos of our Madarsa and training session.
All of u r invited to join us free of charge because it is all about our Wahabizm.
plz watch my channel and enjoy
MuhammedAhmad1 2 years ago
A Shia Killed Sayyiduna Hussain:
To provide a solid proof of this fact (i.e. that Shimr was a Shia), we refer to the esteemed and classical Shia scholar, Al-Qummi. Al-Qummi, author of the famous book Mafaatihul-Jinaan, writes in his book: I say, Shimr was in the forces of Ameer al-Mumineen on the Day of Siffin. (Al-Qummi, Safinatun-Najaat, vol.4, p. 492, Chapter Sheen Followed by Meem).
Shimr lain was not only shia but also real nephew of umul banin, wife of ali.
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
are you spreading your nasibi lies here as well. What is it about Imam Ali (3) & his family that you people hate so much. It is because of them that we are even guided. He is the sword of Allah in every battle where we seen your khalifas run like cowards. & inshalla like your khalifas ran you are also beginning to hide in your holes of ignorance. Alhamdullia it is the age of information & people are seeing the oppression done to alul bayte by your khalifas of ignorance.
jesusforislam 2 years ago
Please, the roots of Râfidism is Nasb!
When we point out that the Prophet married two of his daughters to 'Uthman, they work hard to "prove" they were not his real daughters.
Likewise, they worked hard to "disprove" 'Umar's marriage to the grand-daughter of the Prophet, Umm Kulthum bint Fatima.
Those who wiped the floor with the Romans and the Persians did not flee from any battlefield. This and the myth of the oppression of the Ahl al-Bayt thrives in Shi'a imagination only!
koekiedow 2 years ago
History clearly shows that it was umar & abi bakr that cowardly ran away at the battle of kaibar until the prophet finally had to say"Tomorrow I will give the flag to somebody who will be given victory (by Allah) and who loves Allah and His Apostle and is loved by Allah and His Apostle." & again none other Ali(3) gave victory to the Muslim's. During the life of the prophet (P) & after, directly or indirectly, it is none other then Ali(3) the held the flag of Islam, not even a comparison here.
jesusforislam 2 years ago
Again, this only exists in Shi'a imagination, and the fact that you don't provide daleel, only confirms this!
I've read somewhere (Insha'allah, if i find it, i'll post the reference), that Imâm 'Ali said that the bravest of the Muslims was Abu Bakr.
And i'll repeat it again, the Muslims who vanquished the Persian Majûsi Empire and who broke the back of the Roman Christian Empire were no cowards, nor hypocrites.
koekiedow 2 years ago
Oh for sure, yes indeed that is one of my top ten favorite fabricated hadith about Imam Ali (A.S) saying the Abubakr was the bravest in the whole universe... actually he said that hadith right after he called Abubakr & Umar both SINFULL TREACHEROUS DISHONEST LIARS (Muslim B 019, N 4349). And you say we have a wild imaginationseriously you want more daleels. Why dont you show us one DALEEL of umar & abubakrs bravery DURING the life time of the Prophet (salalahu alayhi wa alehei wa sallam).
jesusforislam 2 years ago
Abu Bakr being the bravest of the people (as said by 'Ali) was recorded by al-Bazzâr in his Musnad [vol.2 p.437] -- Tarikh ibn Kathir [vol.3 p.331)
Neither did al-'Abbas consider 'Ali a sinfull, treacherous, dishonest liar, nor did both of them consider Abu Bakr and 'Umar as such.
Imam Bukhari records the same event without these words, and since Sahih al-Bukhari is more authentic than Sahih Muslim, the former takes precedence.
I don't have to bring daleel to show their bravery...
koekiedow 2 years ago
The mere fact that these two men were those who were mainly responsible for the downfall of the two greatest empires of the ancient world, should be sufficient as a proof of their bravery, at least for those who have an ounce of intellect.
Anyhoe, while the Prophet was praying in Mecca, a man came a started strangling the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam)
And when Abu Bakr saw this, he rushed towards him and pushed him away from the Prophet and said: ...
koekiedow 2 years ago
... "Do you want to kill a man just because he says, 'My Lord is Allah?'" Bukhari vol.5 #195
Or during the battle of Hunain, when many Muslims fled the battlefield, Ibn Ishâq and others relate that among those who bravely stood besides the Prophet were Abu Bakr and Umar.
Likewise during the Battle of Uhud, according to the best of my knowledge, when they were called to battle, they answered the call, and remained steadfast upon Allâh's Path.
koekiedow 2 years ago 2
And after the Prophet's lifetime, made history when they fought the apostate followers of Musaylimah and other false Prophets, and the negators of Zakat, and wiped the floor with the Persians and the Romans.
If this ain't bravery, then i don't know what is.
koekiedow 2 years ago 6
According to the Shiite:
1- Muhammad's son in law is an s.o.b
2- Muhammad's best friend is an s.o.b
3- muhammad's wife is a whore
4- Muhammad's fathers in law are s.o.b's
5- one of Muhammad's wife belongs to the accursed tree of Omaya
6- Muhammad's brother in law, Muawyiah, is no better than Satan.
Now what does that make Muhammad?
2- Ali and a host of the 12 Imam named their children after Othman, Omar, Abu Bakr and Aisha
3- Mohammad married the daughter of
alfalfafalafelmafia 2 years ago
@alfalfafalafelmafia
Welldone!!! In a NUTSHELL! I like!
MayPeaceBeWithYou 2 years ago
@ ALFALFAFALAFELMAFIA Stop cursing the sahaba and sahabiyaat. Even if youre trying to prove a point, this isnt the way you should go about it.
mudessir 2 years ago 10
@mudessir
you maybe more religious than me, but for you to make a powerful argument hit home, you have to take the argument of your interlocutor to the logical extreme to show how silly it is.
alfalfafalafelmafia 2 years ago 2
@alfalfafalafelmafia verry well said in an advocate style,,,subhan allah
ijury 2 years ago
& Alhamdullilah i respect & cherish that name, I am a "rafid", a rejector of the false khalifas that you try to shove down our throats. & you in the same sense are a nasibi, a person that loves & cherishes the people that have oppressed, murdered, robbed, slandered the family of the prophet (Ahlul Bayte). Who the prophet said about them "I am leaving you two weighty things, if you follow them you will never go astray, they are the Qur'an and my Ahlul'bayt". A mutawatir hadith.
jesusforislam 2 years ago
Well, Allâh says that whoever follows the Muhajireen and the Ansar, Allâh will be pleased with them (as He was pleased with the Muhajireen and the Ansâr) and cause them to enter Jannah. [9.100]
The family of the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) was a heavy burden upon the Muslim community, and that's why the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) repeated thrice: "Udhakkarukum Allâha fee Ahl al-Baytee -- I remind you (of your duties) to the members of my family." (Sahih Muslim #5920)
koekiedow 2 years ago
The only BURDEN on the Muslim community was the false khalifas that caused division within Islam while the prophet (P) was on his death bed & after his (P) death. And this verse you quoted from surat 9:100. What does that have to do with the sahaba? It sais: The first and foremost FROM the muhajareen & ansar. Now you are going way out of context.
jesusforislam 2 years ago
"What does that have to do with the sahaba?"
The more you respond, the more my point is being established.
Stop embarrassing yourself...
Allâh clearly establishes the paragonic state of the Muhajirûn and the Ansâr, the foremost among them include the 4 Caliphs.
You don't like, je sais...
The Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) already passed away when the 2 Shaykh rushed towards preventing the political disunity of the Ummah.
You love disunity, je sais...
koekiedow 2 years ago
Moreover, you are a good example of what Rafd can do to a person.
Is there not an evil that you have not attributed to those who are promised Jannah?
Slandering the Ahl al-Bayt is in fact a full-time profession of the Râfidites.
koekiedow 2 years ago
Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, "Some of my companions will come to me at my Lake Fount, and after I recognize them, they will then be taken away from me, whereupon I will say, 'My companions!' Then it will be said, 'You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you." (Bukhari V8 B76 N584)
jesusforislam 2 years ago
After a mischievous statement of Abdullah ibn Salul reached the Prophet, 'Umar went to the Prophet and said: "O Allah's Apostle! Let me chop off the head of this hypocrite!", whereupon he replied to 'Umar: "Leave him, lest the people say Muhammad kills his companions." Bukhari, vol.6 #430
Tell me, is Ibn Salul considered a Sahabi?
koekiedow 2 years ago
yea you are right, of course he stands out. like a Munafiq. go even to non muslims historians and ask them. see what they have to say about him
jambe1234567 2 years ago 5
Stick to Islam and the Quran. That is the Truth. Enough with this Shia and Sunni nonsense. Enough with these interpretations that mean nothing. Like this man is saying what Allah (swt) put in the heart of the prophet He put in the heart of Abu Baker. How does he know that?! Amazing things that us Muslims come up with sometimes. Stick to the Word of Allah! Stick to the Quran! It is the Only Perfect Truth and Guide.
LordRamadan 2 years ago
Wasn't it Abu Bakr who told the Muslims where to bury the Prophet (saw) ?
The Prophet passed away on a Monday and was buried the next day.
The reason for this was because it was simply impossible for all the Muslims to pray over him simultaneously, they had to pray in groups, and it was not untill all Muslims had prayed over the Prophet, that he was buried.
Abu Bakr and Umar might not have been present when the Prophet's body was being washed, but they were present during the funeral.
m.s
koekiedow 2 years ago
shias satanic views about nobel Quran:
1.) Not Completed.
(Usul Kafi 1:228/ Faslul Kitaab fi Tahrif. Kitaabi Raabul Arbaa of Nuri Tibarsi approved by Khomeni in ' Al- Hukumaat -ul-Islamiyaa")
.
2.) Has 17,000 Aayats. (Usul Kafi P671)
3.) Our's has 6,666. (Usul Kafi P671)
4.) Abu Bakr's opposed the text of the Quraan.(Kashful Asraar P111.)
5.) Original Quraan with 12th Imaam Mahdi. (Usul Kafi 2-632)
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
KhushKhabri $ KhushKhabri $ KhushKhabri
I hav uploaded some latest videos of my Madarsa in which u can see our new batch is enjoying the Sunnet of Sayedna Abu Bakar Sideek(ra) that is real pleasure of life.
All of u can find me their enjoying with Abdur Rehman.
All the credit goes to my Abdur Rehman who give us permission to make this extra ordinary Rocking Video of our Madarsa and training session.
All of u r invited to join us free of charge because it? is all about our Wahabizm.
c my channel
MuhammedAhmad1 2 years ago
The Prophet,saw, said:
O people, I had permitted you Mutah before, [but now] whoever of you has any part in it currently must part with her, and do not take back anything which you may have given them, as Allah Exalted and Majestic has forbidden it until the day of resurrection. [Muslim, Abu Dawood, Ibn Majah, Nasa`i, and Darimi]
NINJASWORD1, BEFORE BLAMING EVERY THING ON UMAR (RA), READ THE REAL HISTORY AND NOT THAT HISTORY INVENTED BY ENEMIES OF ISLAM AND ENEMIES OF SAHABAS.
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
When Ali was given the Caliphate, he thanked Allah Most High and praised Him and said:
O people, the Messenger of Allah had permitted Mutah three times then forbade it. I swear by Allah, ready to fulfil my oath, that if I find any person who engages in temporary marriage without having ratified this with a proper marriage, I will have him lashed 100 stripes unless he can bring two witnesses to prove that the Messenger had permitted it after forbidding it. [Ibn Majah]
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
(ii) banned by prophet,saw, himself on the eve of khyber battle. abu bakr, umar,usman and ali (ra) only carried the orders of Allah revealed on last prophet,saw. why ali did not reinstate mutah during his (ali) khilafat? who stopped ali (ra) from doing so? if mutah is halal, tell me how many imams of shias or their children have done mutah? i dont know why shias have strange habit of putting every blame on three khulfas whereas ali did not change a single law of his preceeding khulfas.
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
(i) ninjasword1, first of all make it clear that umar (ra) did not introduce Tarawih prayers. muslims prayed in Prophet,saw, life also and prophet,saw, also prayed salat Tarawih but later left and told clearly sahabs that if they may wish they may continue or leave it. even ali (ra) did not banned salat tarawih during his (ali ) khilafat. if it was against orders of Allah, it means ali (ra) is also equally respoonsible that ali (ra) allowed an unislamic act during his khilafat.
Mutah was
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
Prophet Muhammad (SAW) ''Fear from Allah! Fear from Allah! Do not criticise my Companions [R.A] after me; one who loved them, he/she loved them due to once's love with me; and the one who kept malice with them, he/she kept it due to once's animosity with me; and the one who annoyed them, he/she annoyed me; and the one who annoyed me, he/she annoyed Allah [S.W.T]; and the one who annoyed Allah [S.W.T], its soon that Allah [S.W.T] will punish him/her". [Tirmizi, vol#2 pg#249]
exshia 2 years ago
And regarding Fadak I have alreadyproved (checky my mail) from your books that Prophet gifted the Bagh-e-Fadak to Fatima on the order of Allah"And give to the near of kin his due and (to) the needy and the wayfarer, and do not squander wastefully." (7:26)
This is also confirmed by dozens of your scholars in their books.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
That's nonsense!
Because IF it was gift, then that means it is already in her possession during the lifetime of the Prophet! (the land of Fadak was captured from the Jews on the 7th year of Hijra)
The fact is, Fatima and others from the family of the Prophet came to ask for the INHERITANCE.
It is for this reason that ignorant Shi'ites accuse Abu Bakr of fabricating this hadith: "The Prophets don't leave behind (material) INHERITANCE, what they leave behind is charity."
koekiedow 2 years ago
The irony is that there are sound narrations from Shi'a collections that confirm this saying!
Even al-Khomeini uses this hadith in his book, "Islamic Government" and says: "The links in the chain of transmission of this tradition are all trustworthy; in fact, Ibrāhīm ibn Hāshim, father of Ali ibn Ibrāhīm, is not moderately trustworthy but outstandingly so."
Yet YOU continue to indirectly accuse Abu Bakr of lying upon the Prophet!
koekiedow 2 years ago
The fact is that she did not speak to Abu Bakr and it was her will that those have hurted her should not participate in her funeral (This is confirmed by your hundereds of scholars including Bukahri).
Remeber What Prphet said "Fatima is part of mine, one who hurts Fatima, hurts me and one who hurts me,hurts Allah"
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Moreover, you do know you're presenting Fatima al-Zahrâ as a selfish woman, who didn't want the land of Fadak to be given in charity, as to benefit those Muslims who are less fortunate!
This is the reality of those who claim to be the followers of the Ahlel Bayt!
Lastly, without blindly and copying (as usual)..
Tell me, when 'Ali became the Khalifa, WHY didn't he return the land of Fadak to it's "rightfull owners"?
koekiedow 2 years ago
If some one seizes your property and house and if you go to court to complain, would you be called as selfish?? The fact is that Fadak was in possesion of Syeda Fatima and her first plea was that Fadak is his property and when they refused to give she was asked to rpovide witness.Her witness were Ali,Hassan and Hussain. Your number of scholars have confirmed Prophet had gifted Fadak to Fatima (Jalaudin Syuti,Fakhrudin Razi, Ibn-e-Kathir and many others)
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
That's nonsense!
The Zanadiqa Shi'a accuse Abu Bakr of lying upon the Prophet for FALSELY claiming that the Prophet said:
"We Prophets don't leave behind any (material) INHERITANCE...."
If it was a gift, then there would NO reason for Abu Bakr to fabricate it!!
If it was a gift, then there is NO reason for Fâtima to go to Abu Bakr for it, because she would already be the owner of it!
Anyhoe, i know that you're just a stubborn Zindiq, keep making the Jews happy...
m.s
koekiedow 2 years ago
It is worthless talk to a jahil like you. You will never accept. You wahabi agent of jews. Go to hell.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
LOL!!
Look who's talking?!
The same individiual who rejects the most clearest of âyâts to suit the whims and desires of the religion of the Zanâdiqa!
Don't forget that you are the ones who please the enemies of Allâh by bickering over a land which was taken from the Jews!!
Which is ironic, considering that the founder of your religion was a Abdullah ibn Saba, the crypto-Jew!!
koekiedow 2 years ago
When the Mubahila ended Prophet addressed to Allah and said O!Allah These are members of my household. Prophet did not take any wife with himself.
Refer Khilafat-o-Mulokiat of Molana Mododi
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
When you can not answer, you have habit of using abusive language. This shows your chracter.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
I have mail you. Check your inbox
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
The fact that YOU on more than one occassion, blindly copy and pasted from deceivers who presented well-known Shi'ites (al-Mas'udi and Ya'qubi) as "Sunni historians" and NOW, "your great ulema" referring to the Shi'i leaning Ibn Abi al-Hadid al-Mu'tazili who was well-know as the one who wasted his time by writing a worthless commentary on a useless book (Najh al-Balagha).
This pretty much given us an idea what "proof" you have in store for us!
Yep, absolutely NOTHING!
koekiedow 2 years ago
It is worthless to talk to you. I have given you reference of Ibn-e-Hajar Maki,Jalaludin Syuttii,Fakhr al-Razi,al-Tabari, Ibn Kathir,by Ibn al-Athir and many others. Are they Shiaa??
I am wasting my time to discuss these things with the bigget Jahil in the earth. I never used abusive language for you but you always did. This is the chracter of all the Wahabis.
Every one knows who is agent of the jews. (Saudi,Egypt,JordanUAE).Now Go to hell.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Koeki
I will mail you today the Complete Part of "Wives of the Prophet not included in Ahulbay" and also Fadak (will prove from Quran and your books that Fadak was Usurped). I would request you to read objectively and independently). I am not writting here complete details of above on the comment section because shortage of time
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
12) Reference of Remaining part 11
Sunni reference: al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar, Ch. 11, section 1, p220
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
11)
The fact that the gender in later part of Verse 33:33 is switched from feminine to masculine has led the majority of Sunni commentators to believe that the last part was revealed for Imam Ali Fatimah Hasan and Husain as Ibn Hajar al-Haythami indicated: Based on the opinion of the majority ofSunnicommentators the saying of Allah :"Verily Allah intends to.. (the last sentence of the verse 33:33)was revealed for Ali Fatimah Hasanand Husain because of the usage of masculine in the word"Ankum"
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
10) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Also al-Tabari quotes Umm Salama saying:
I said, "O Prophet of Allah! Am I not also one of your Ahlul-Bayt?" I swear by the Almighty that the Holy Prophet did NOT grant me any distinction and said: "You have a good future."
Sunni reference: Tafsir al-Tabari, v22, p7 under the commentary of verse 33:33
(I have got dozens of references of your books, however I have included only few references here, if you wish I can mail to you)
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
9)Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Also the wording reported by al-Suyuti and Ibn al-Athir is as follows:
Umm Salama said to the Holy Prophet: "Am I also one of them?" He replied: "No. You have your own special position and your future is good."
Sunni reference:
•Usdul Ghabah, by Ibn al-Athir, v2, p289
•Tafsir al-Durr al-Manthoor, by al-Suyuti, v5, p198
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
8)Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
In the tradition of al-Hakim the wording the last question and answer is as follows:
Umm Salama said: "O Prophet of Allah! Am I not one of the members of your family?" The Holy Prophet replied: "You have a good future but only these are the members of my family. O Lord! The members of my family are more deserving."
Sunni reference: al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v2, p416
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
7) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
It is interesting to see that Aisha, the wife of the Prophet (PBUH&HF) is the narrator of the above tradition, and she herself is testifying that Ahlul- Bayt are the above-mentioned individuals (i.e., Imam Ali, Fatimah, al-Hasan, and al-Husain, may the blessing of Allah be upon them all).
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
6) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
2.The purification sentence in Quran (the last sentence of Verse 33:33) was revealed for the virtue of the above-mentioned individuals, and NOT for the wives of the Prophet (PBUH&HF).
Muslim (the Author) did not put any other tradition in this section. If the author of Sahih Muslim believed that the wives of the Prophet were included in Ahlul-Bayt, he would have quoted some traditions about them in this section.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
5) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Sunni reference:
•Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61
One can see that the author of Sahih Muslim confirms that:
1.Imam Ali, Fatimah, al-Hasan, and al-Husain are the Ahlul-Bayt,
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
4) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
(Remaining Part of Hadith)
then Ali came and the Prophet entered him to the cloak as well. Then the Prophet recited: "Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul-Bayt), and purify you a perfect purification (the last sentence of Verse 33:33)."
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
3) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Narrated Aisha:
One day the Prophet (PBUH&HF) came out afternoon wearing a black cloak (upper garment or gown; long coat), then al-Hasan Ibn Ali came and the Prophet accommodated him under the cloak, then al-Husain came and entered the cloak, then Fatimah came and the Prophet entered her under the cloak,
(Remaining Hadith in the next Part)
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
2) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Note that the word "Rijs" in the above verse has got the article "al-" at its beginning which makes the word universal. Thus "al-Rijs" means "EVERY KIND of impurity". Also at the end of the verse, Allah states "and purify you a PERFECT purification." The word "perfect" comes from the emphasis of "Tat'hiran". This is the only place in Quran that Allah uses the emphasis of "PERFECT purification".
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
1) Wives of the Prophets are not included in Ahlbayt
Evidence From Quran
as "Purification Verse" (Ayah al-Tat'hir):
"Verily Allah intends to keep off from you every kind of uncleanness O' People of the House (Ahlul-Bayt), and purify you with a perfect purification". (Quran, the last sentence of Verse 33:33)
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Fadak3
"Use your Commen sense"
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
2) Fadak
And Use your If Prophets do not inherit, what will their children do? will they start begging?
Now I will have to tell you complete detail of Fadak and its Usurpation from your own books
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
The Jews are very happy that the Shi'ites for centuries are bickering over the land that was taken from them!
You people are pleasing and causing joy to those upon whom Allâh's Wrath is upon!
May Allâh make you join them on the Day of Judgement!
You are indirectly accusing Abu Bakr of lying upon the Prophet when he said that "Prophets don't leave (material) inheritance".
When I bring you an authentic hadith from your collections that says the same thing, you reject it!
Allâhul Musta'an!
koekiedow 2 years ago
Your second lie is also caught regarding Wives of the Prophet included in AhulbaytRead Sahih Muslim Book 31number 5923For your convinence
" Aren't the wives (of the Holy Prophet) included amongst the members of his house hold? Thereupon he said: No by Allah, a woman lives with a man (as his wife) for a certain period; he then divorces her and she goes back to her parents and to her people; the members of his household include his ownself and his kith and kin (who are related to him by blood)
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
It is by DEFAULT that the wives of the Prophet are the Ahlel Bayt, because Allâh ('azza wa jal) adressed them as such in His Book. [33:32-33]
In Verse 32, Allâh says:
"O wives of the Prophet! You are unlike other women..."
"It is not (right)...that you (Muslims) should ever marry his wives after him." [33.53]
It is by way of generalization that 'Ali, Fâtima, al-Hassan and Hussain are included, as mentioned in Sahih Muslim.
# 5920 Zayd says: "His wives are the members of his family..."
koekiedow 2 years ago
I gave you reference of Sahih Muslim Hadith which specifically states that "wives of the Prophet are not included in AhulBayt". Either accept that Hadith Sahih Muslim Book 31number 5923 is correct or accept that Sahih Muslims if full of contradiction.
On this issue again I will give you evidences from your own books and Holy Quran that wives of the Prophet are not included in Ahulbayt.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
That hadith is NOT an explanation of that âyât.
It is simply a hadith which was beautifully narrated by 'Aisha (radhiallâhu 'anh) to show the deep love the Prophet had for 'Ali, Fâtima, Hasan and Hussain, and so that Allâh may also purify them when he recited half of âyât!.
I repeat, it is by DEFAULT that the wives are the Ahle Bayt, read it for yourself. (33.28-34)
It is only the hatred that you have for the family of the Prophet that prevents you from accepting the obvious!
koekiedow 2 years ago
Then why the prophet not allowed Hazrat Umm-e-Salma to enter into Chadar? Verse (33:33) is specifically addressed to these five persons even Aisha has confirmed and number of your Ulema have confirmed it.
You want another proof Sura-e-Aal-e-Imran Ayat No.60 (Mubahila) and the Prophet was ordered by Allah to take the members of household with himself for Mubahila. Only these four persons accompanied the Prophet.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Try to understand the difference between the two...
ALLÂH revealed those âyâts (33.28-34) in regards to the wives of the Prophet.
This is something agreed upon, especially when read in context.
THE PROPHET used half- of that âyât in respect to his daughter, son-in-law and grand-sons, which shows the deep love he has for them and desire for them to be purified.
The former does not negate the latter, nor does the latter negate the former!
Compréndé?
Try to be more openminded...
koekiedow 2 years ago
(33:33) is totally separate. Remmber usage of masculine gender in the word "Ankum" . Gibraeil recited this ayat and brought the message of Allah that Allah intends to purify the AhulBayt.
Not allowing Hazrat Umm-e-Salma into the Chadar is strong proof that wives are not included AhulBayt and purification is refered to these five which is also confimed by your scholars.
Not taking the wives to Mubahila is another proof. Prophet said O Allah! "These are members of my household"
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
That's false, because the latter part of verse 33 is in the masculine sense BECAUSE the one who is adressed is the HEAD of the household, the Prophet (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam).
In the Arabic language, if there is a group with only one man but many women, the group is to be adressed in the masculine sense.
Let me say it again, the former does not negate the latter, nor does the latter negate the former...
koekiedow 2 years ago
The ahadiths about Umm Salama and the Cloak are no doubt weak.
The stronger version in Sahih Muslim makes more sense, and there is no mentioning of the wives going about to enter the cloak, because this would mean that they were unaware that they were the ones whom Allâh revealed those âyâts in the first place.
koekiedow 2 years ago
I knew you will never admit. This is the history of you people.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
It's obvious that you're an idiot who has NO sense whatsoever!
If Allâh revealed those âyâts to the wives of the Prophet, WHY - for God's Sake - WHY would the Mothers of the Believers ask to enter the Cloak?
Don't you have any sense?
Subhânallâh, the more i argue with you, the more i recall that statement of Imâm al-Shafi'i!
koekiedow 2 years ago
ahadiths about Umm Salama is also narrated in Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, pp 351,663, even your radical Molvis have never said that this hadith is weak. All the sunni scholar has confirmed that this hadith is aunthentic inclding Ibn-e-Athir,Syuti, Tabari,Fakhrudin Razi, Ibn-e-Kathir.
What can I do for you?? and what about Mubahila????
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Why Prophet did not take wives to Mubahila??
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
It's irrelevant whether he (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) would bring his 9 wives with him, the fact of the matter is that they were the reason of revelation. (33:28-34)
Moreover, according Asbâb al-Nuzûl of al-Wâhidi:
"The Messenger of Allah, Allah bless him and give him peace, went and brought al-Hasan, al-Husayn, Fatimah and all his family and children...."
It doesn't mean it is Sahih, but this shows that there are ahadith that affirm the general meaning of âyât al-Mubâhala...
koekiedow 2 years ago
Regarding Why did not Imam Ali handed over Fadak?
Remember actual owner of the property had already passed away.
Aisha started war against Imam Ali immediately after he became Caliph
Then, Muwaiya started war against Imam Ali which continued years.
Talha and Zubair started insurgency against his Khilafat.They never allowed him to rule comfrotably.
Bani Ummaya made propegenda that Ali has love for wealth (Remember all the caliphs of Bani Ummaya used to curse Imam Ali)
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Remebr Umar Bin Abdul Aziz handed over Fadak to the descedants of Hazrat Fatima (A.S). It was seized again afater his rule but when Mamun Rashid became Caliph he again handed over the propeerty to the descedents of Fatima Zehra.
Now it is your choice to decide who was correct either Bibi Fatima or Abu Bakr.
bye
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
That's FALSE!
'Umar ibn Abdel 'Aziz RETURNED it to the way it was dealt with by the Prophet, Abu Bakr Umar, Uthman and 'Ali after Marwan or another Ummayad King changed it!
It might me part of YOUR religion to disobey Allâh and His Messenger in obedience to the Creation (even if it be the family of the Prophet), but NOT our religion, and especially not the religion of Sayyidinâ Abu Bakr al-Siddiq!
koekiedow 2 years ago
About Zakariyya's invocation the Holy Qur'an says: "And Zakariyya, when he cried to his Lord: 'O my Lord, leave me not childless, though Thou art the best of inheritors.' So we responded to him and gave him Yahya." (21: 89,90)
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
War lasted for 33 days and Hezbollah was victorious with the help of Allah. Every one accepted that Israel was defeated. Even arab countries who were defeated said Hezbollah has saved us from insult which we had in 1967. Your arab countries are the biggest collabrators of USA (Saudi Arabia,Egypt,Jordan,UAE).
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Regarding successor of Prophet, I will send two or three mails to both of you (M.Ahmad and kokei) to prove that Prophet did declare Imam Ali as his successor. But I will put one condition, Before start reading my mails, you will have to be independent not as rigid sunni (not willing to accept anything) and read the entire mails. This is my only condition.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
It is surprising, as all your historians and have recorded in their authentic books, that Caliph Abu Bakr, at the time of his death, asked Uthman to write down what he (Abu Bakr) was saying. It was his will. He wrote down whatever Abu Bakr dictated to him. Umar and others were also present on this occasion. No one objected. Umar did not say: "The Book of Allah is sufficient for us; we do not need Abu Bakr's will." But he did not allow the Holy Prophet of Allah to write his will.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
For God's Sake, the Prophet was seriously ill!
Can't you give him a break!?
He used to fall un-conscious because of the severity of the fever he was suffering from (while Abu Bakr and Umar weren't), and when 'Umar saw the Prophet in that state, he then said: "Verily Allahs Messenger is deeply afflicted with pain. You have the Quran with you. The Book of Allah is sufficient for us." (Muslim bk.13 #4016]
But since you are filled with hatred, you can't recognize compassion (from a Sahabi)...
koekiedow 2 years ago
...even if it slapped you on the face!
Subhânallâh!
You REALLY believe that 'Umar would stay put in one place for OVER 70 hours (inspite of evidences that go against it)!!
Allâhul Musta'an!
Blind partisanship does make one look silly!
Anyhoe, Ibn 'Abbas continued...
"He (the Prophet) said:...I make a WILL about three things (i.e verbally): (one of them was) Turn out the polytheists from the territory of Arabia..." (ibid #4014)
Who executed this command?
koekiedow 2 years ago
In fact Shibli Numani himself testifies the above event in the following
words: "From Umar's irritable and peevish temperament such an action on his part was not improbable."
Sunni reference: al-Faruq, by Shibli Numani, p44
ghulammurtaza1983 2 years ago
gulmurtuza, where have you disappeared, why are you not replying. i dont know why shias try to prove that ali (ra) was a coward by inventing non sense and unbelievable stories.
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
There is shiaa sunni munazra on this topic alone "Attacking Fatima A.S). For your convinence go to the following link and watch all 13 videos of this munazra
ghulammurtaza1983 2 years ago
giant lmao, Ali was the greastest muslam after the prophet. seriously man go and get some knowlge b4 ur open ur mouth.
Abu Baker was nothing more than snitch umar was an alcoholic , sunnis get it right , get it throught ur heads ahyal abait have and own hight rank then wat u beleive in, fu#kn wahabbies
stepbck1 2 years ago
step, if ali (ra) has so much divine qualities which shia-taans believe then why not Allah appointed ali (ra) as a prophet? abu bakr was nothing, that is why he was praised by Allah in Quran Majeed, and last prophet,saw, made him father in law and ali (ra) made him brother in law.Umar was alcoholic that is why he was father in law of last prophet,saw and son in law of ali (ra). Allah, last prophet,saw, and ali (ra) are wrong but these shia-taans followers of abdullah bin saba are right.
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
Sunni historian Abul Hasan, Ali Ibn al-Husain al-
Mas'udi who in his book 'Isbaat al-Wasiyyah' describes the events in detail
and reports that: "They surrounded Ali (AS) and burned the door of his
house and pulled him out against his will and pressed the leader of all
women (Hadhrat Fatimah (AS)) between the door and the wall killing Mohsin
(the male-child she was carrying in her womb for six months)."
ghulammurtaza1983 2 years ago
(i) gulmurtaza, shias believe that all sahabas were cowards and only ali was brave and when sahabas ran away in wars only ali was sufficient for kuffars. then how it is possible that two or three of more than it people surronded ali and ali remained silent and ali did not save fatima. it means shias believe that ali was a coward because ali did not save fatima and remained silent. whereas we muslims believe that ali was tiger of Allah. then why ali married widow of jaffar bin abu talib to
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
Imam Ali was surronded by dozens of people. How come even a brave person over power dozens of people. I have not quoted refrences of shiaa books these are books of Ahle-eSunnat. Even if you do not acknowledge about that attack, Abu bakr himself has acknowledged and regreted "Abu Bakr said (on his death bed): "I wish I had not searched for Fatimah's house, and had not sent men to harass her"
Sunni references History of Ya'qubi, v2, pp 115-116 Ansab Ashraf, by al-Baladhuri, v1, pp 582,586
ghulammurtaza1983 2 years ago
(ii) abu bakr and name of that widow was asma bint umais and after death of abu bakr, ali married himself with that widow of abu bakr. ali married his own daughter umme kulsoo bint ali to umar. then shias believe that ali is imam (rather above all prophets) and he knows the knowledge of future. why imamat of ali failed and why ali did not know that three khulfas will beat and rather kill his wife fatima, as shias blame. it means what shias believe then they themselves refute it.first shias prove
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
Shias do not believe that all sahabas are bad but those hurted prophet and left him alone in the battlefields. We do not call them sahaba. Who prevented Prohphet from writting his will for Ummah. Prophet angrily ordered him to get out of his romm Again from Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 70, Number 573 Read this. Who left the prophet in the battle of Uhud?? Again I can give you reference from your books
ghulammurtaza1983 2 years ago
(iii) that ali was coward because he did not save fatima.the second point shias themselves prove that ali was not imam and neither he had knowledge of future because he did not know that three khulfas will beat and kill his wife. if those three khulfas killed fatima, as shias blame, then why ali married widow of jaffar bin abu talib to abu bakr? why ali married his daughter to umar(i can prove this marriage from shia books)?why ali kept his five sons names on three khulfas?will you reply please?
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
Yâ Zindiq, stop quoting and pasting lies...
BOTH Ya'qubi and al-Mas'ûdi were Rawâfid...
al-'Allama al-Hilli wrote:
"Ali ibn Hussain ibn Ali al-Mas'ûdi...He has a book about IMAMATE and others, from them a book in proving the Wasiyyah of Ali ibn Abi Talib(a) and he is the author of the book "Murûj al-Dhahab". (Khulasât p.186)
On al-Ya'qubi, see:
h t t p : / / w w w . islamtoday . c o m / s h o w _ d e t a i l _ s e c t i o n . c f m ? q _ i d = 1190 & m a i n _ c a t _ i d = 2
koekiedow 2 years ago
Who prevented Prophet from writting his will for Ummah. Person was Umar and Prophet ordered him to get out of his room Refer Sahih Bukahri Volume 7, Book 70, Number 573:
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
The Final will of the Prophet for his Ummah was executed by none other than Umar al-Faruq, when he (salallâhu 'alayhi wa sallam) ordered that no two religions can co-exist in the Arabian Peninsula.
koekiedow 2 years ago
This is not the answer. Why did he prevent Prophet from writting his will for Ummah so that they do not go astray. Prophet got angry and ordered him to leave his home Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 76, Number 578 I would advise you to read first and then respond.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
True, as Ibn 'Abbas said: "people should not differ before a prophet."
The Prophet being "prevented" to write doesn't mean that he didn't fullfill it (verbally).
Infact, Ibn 'Abbas continues by saying:
"The Prophet on his death−bed, gave three orders saying, (of one them was) "Expel the pagans from the Arabian Peninsula..." [al-Bukhari vol.4 #288]
The question i ask you, who implemented this command?
Was it one of the "Bad Companions"?
Yes/No?
koekiedow 2 years ago
Why did Umar prevent Prophet from writting his will for Ummahr so that they do not go astary. Probably he was afraid that Prophet may write about his successor. Prophet declared Imam Ali as his successor even in his first speech
Sunni References:
History of al-Tabari, English version, v6, pp 88-91
History of Ibn Athir, v2, p62
History of Ibn Asakir, v1, p85
Tafsir al-Durr al-Manthoor, by al-Hafidh Jalaluddin al-Suyuti, v5, p97
(5) Tafsir al-Khazin, by Ala'uddin al-Shafi'i, v3, p371
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Where does it say "'Umar prevented Prophet from writing"?
It just says that 'Umar said: "The Prophet is seriously ill and you have the Qur'an; so the
Book of Allah is enough for us." (he said this after the Prophet lost consciousness)
Besides, you really expect me to believe that 'Umar (or anyone else) would prevent the Prophet from writing this "indispensable" will for over 70 hours? (i.e from Thursday to Monday)
I hope not, because even râfidi narrations tell us that his near relatives...
koekiedow 2 years ago
You said that Umar did not prevent from writting. I am quoting Sahih BukhariVolume 7, Book 70, Number 573Allah's Apostle said, "Go away!" Narrated 'Ubaidullah: Ibn 'Abbas used to say,
"It was very unfortunate that Allah's Apostle was prevented from writing that statement for them because of their disagreement and noise."
Ibn-e-Abbas confirms that Prophet was prevented from writting and Prophet said to them "Go away".
Ibn-e-Abbas used to cry about this unfortunate event.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
WHERE does it say that "'Umar prevented the Prophet from writing"?
Put on your glasses:
"It was very unfortunate that Allah's Apostle was prevented from writing that statement for them because of THEIR disagreement and noise."
"During his illness, the Prophet of Allah asked for a pen and paper. Since he was then undergoing the intensity of his illness, Umar intervened to say that he must not be put in any trouble for the Quran is enough for us all - as he has already said...
koekiedow 2 years ago
...But some of the companions were in favor of letting him dictate. The Prophet disliked the clamor of voices and asked the people to leave. At the time, he was suffering from a violent headache and this was the reason why Umar had suggested not to trouble him in any way. When his (the Prophets) pain had subsided a little, he called the people in and [narrated three things]
(Tarîkh al-Islâm, Vol.1, p.244-245)
As mentioned earlier, WHO executed the will of the Prophet to expel the pagans?
koekiedow 2 years ago
This is fabricated hadith. You will try everything to defend him because you have blind faith on these companions. If they were really sincere with the Prophet, why did they leave the Prophet alone in the Batlle of Uhud and Hunain and exposed him to danger.Don't forget to watch Munazra on Attacking Fatima. If you do not have time watch at least video13 our Aalim has given dozen refernce of your books regarding Abu Bakr's acknowledgement of attacking Fatima.Even it is narrated in Kanzul Ummal.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Thank you for proving my point!
Let me re-phrase your comment...
"You will try everything to defend these lies because of your blind hatred for the Sahaba."
Who the hell are you to question the sincerity of those who fled during the battle of Uhud, while Allâh himself forgave them! See [3.155] and [9.27]
Face it, YOU believe that 'Ali would give his daughter, who is the daughter of Fâtima in marriage to someone who killed her mother!
Seriously, how do you deal with such a conundrum?
koekiedow 2 years ago
Mr. Kokei I referd to hadith which you anrrated that "Prophet gave verbal instruction" This is total lie. Do you want to know the reality of your books? I am going to mail you few links because I do not want to expose your books in public .
What about Battle of Khyber and Hunain? Why did Umar flee in the battale of khyber without giving a fight? and Finally, Prophet had to finally call Imam Ali in this war. Finally Muslims forces got victory because of Imam Ali.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Arguing with you, reminds me of a statement of Imâm al-Shafi'î (rahimahullâh), who once said: "Everytime I argue with a Jâhil, I always lose."
Listen, if you don't respond to the points i've raised, you'll be blocked from commenting any time soon...
What i mean by responding is an answer, not with another question, compréndé?
koekiedow 2 years ago
You people are the biggest Jahils. You people have history of denying facts. You people are like Abu Jahl whom Prophet showed many Mojizat but he did not accept Islam. I have given answers to each of your question. I have sent you links of videos to show reality of your Sahih Sitta in which your scholars have included fabricated traditions which insult the Prophet. Any way, if you do not want me to comment, I will not. But if you insult Shiaas (truste followers of Prophet) I will hit you back.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
No one needs to insult shias. Allah has himself hit this satanic firqa which is divided into more than 40 firqas like asna ashri, ismailis, nusseri, zaidia, kissania,bihai, druz, alwite, qaddaya and many more. Allah has never allowed this firqa to dominate Makkah and Madinah since the dawn of islam till todate i.e. for the last 1450 year. there is no compulsion for muslims to pay salats behind shias but shias had to pay salat behind sunni rather wahabi imams in Makkah and Madina. think about it.
MuhammadAhmad1 2 years ago
You people are the biggest Shitaans in this world. You people are divided into dozens of sects Hanafi, Shafai,Maliki, Hanbali,Ahl-e-Hadith,Qadri, Wahabi,Mutazali,Qadyani,Tableeghi etc.
And remember, you people were defeated in 1967 war.Five sunni contries attacked Israel simultaneously and the result was, half of their territory was captured by Israel. But when Hezbollah had war with jews in 2006.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
"You people have history of denying facts."
Which facts?
The fact that 'Umar married the daughter of Fâtima?
The fact that 'Ali pledged to Abu Bakr and 'Umar?
The fact that the wives of the Prophet ARE the Ahlel Bayt?
Oh wait, you're the ones who deny these facts!
And why the hell would you mention the Six Books?
What do these have to do with YOU slandering the Sahaba??
1-Scan the page of Shibli Nu'mani's book where he considers the story - which you soo dearly love - to be a fact!
koekiedow 2 years ago
2- Yâ Zindiq, there is no doubt that you just make these up as you go along,
Ibn Kathir (in his Tafseer 9.25) clearly states that those who remained with the Prophet during the battle of Hunain included Abu Bakr and `Umar.
3- We can't help it if you have taken Fâtima as a Godess besides Allâh!
The Prophet said, "Our Property is not to be inherited, what we leave behind is charity."
....
koekiedow 2 years ago
Your biggest lie is caught
One of the arguments of Fatima rejecting the hadith was that, if the hadith were true, then why were there so many verses about the inheritances of the prophets. She said: "At one place the Holy Qur'an says, 'And Solomon was David's heir.'"(27:16)
About the prophet Zakariyya the Holy Qur'an says: "Therefore grant me from thyself an heir, who shall inherit of me and inherit (also) of the house of Jacob." (19,5-6)
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago
Yes, Sulaymân inherited Prophethood from his father Dawud, and knowledge!
Thank you for further proving this by mentioning the du'â of Zakariyya (a.s), since Yahyâ inherited from his father Prophethood and knowledge!
This is further confirmed by a Hadith reported in Usûl al-Kâfi that the Prophet said: "The prophets did not leave a single dinār or dirham; instead they left knowledge."
Imâm al-Khomeini declares this hadith Sahih in his "Islamic Government". [Section 3, Footnote 177]
koekiedow 2 years ago
1) Fadak
O Jahil! Put on double glasses before commenting. Prophetood is not inherited ask your molvis whether Prophetood is inherited. I am sure he will slap you. Prophet is appointed by Allah.
Solomon inherited all the wealth, Property and kingdom ask your molvis. Zakiriya pleaded to Allah to give him son who will inherit his property because he feared that his enemies will seize his property after his death. Therefore, this hadith is totally rejected.
ghulammurtaza110 2 years ago