@lazur1: It records, among other things, the total amount of mechanical work performed during the set. So if you do, say, three reps and produce 1,000 units of mechanical work (force X distance) in one set, and a week later produce 1,200 units of mechanical work in those same three reps, you're stronger. You could also compare peak levels of torque or your average rate of mechanical work in sessions from week to week. There are different ways to track progress based on varying goals.
@xanthromera: the production model has a screen that you're looking at as you do the exercise. It measures the total torque that you're producing against the movement arm. At then end you can compare your torque through the range of movement to that of previous workouts. In the same way that you progress with conventional equipment (more weight or more reps or both), you progress hear when you're able to press more strongly against the machine. If not, you know to add more days of rest.
@xanthromera: the production model has a screen that you're looking at as you do the exercise. It measures the total torque that you're producing against the movement arm. At the end you can compare your torque through the range of movement to that of previous workouts. In the same way that you progress with conventional equipment (more weight or more reps or both), you progress here when you're able to press more strongly against the machine. If not, you know to add more days of rest.
@MRDOLCE247 (Why is your post marked as spam?) Does the meter record the entire set? i understand that watching the #s -during- the set is good feedback, but if all you get afterwards is a max # or an average #, tracking progress could be confusing.
I know that traditionally resisted slow reps must keep times fast enough to avoid neural "ratcheting", but I'd think that segmented movement wouldn't be an issue with this technology. If I'm right, couldn't the machine be set for just -one- very long negative? Wouldn't it be more efficient to eliminate the "unweighted" 1/2-rep?
@lazur1: It records, among other things, the total amount of mechanical work performed during the set. So if you do, say, three reps and produce 1,000 units of mechanical work (force X distance) in one set, and a week later produce 1,200 units of mechanical work in those same three reps, you're stronger. You could also compare peak levels of torque or your average rate of mechanical work in sessions from week to week. There are different ways to track progress based on varying goals.
MRDOLCE247 11 months ago
@MRDOLCE247 So are these units in any Chicago gyms yet?
lazur1 11 months ago
This thing looks like it would snap you're spine in half!
VicePresidentBob 1 year ago
This look's like this machine would try to lynch you
VicePresidentBob 1 year ago
wtf is that?
NobleBone187 1 year ago
WTF IS THIS??? SOME KILLER MACHINE?!?!?! LMFAO
jofrey123456781 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xanthromera: the production model has a screen that you're looking at as you do the exercise. It measures the total torque that you're producing against the movement arm. At then end you can compare your torque through the range of movement to that of previous workouts. In the same way that you progress with conventional equipment (more weight or more reps or both), you progress hear when you're able to press more strongly against the machine. If not, you know to add more days of rest.
MRDOLCE247 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xanthromera: the production model has a screen that you're looking at as you do the exercise. It measures the total torque that you're producing against the movement arm. At the end you can compare your torque through the range of movement to that of previous workouts. In the same way that you progress with conventional equipment (more weight or more reps or both), you progress here when you're able to press more strongly against the machine. If not, you know to add more days of rest.
MRDOLCE247 1 year ago
@MRDOLCE247 (Why is your post marked as spam?) Does the meter record the entire set? i understand that watching the #s -during- the set is good feedback, but if all you get afterwards is a max # or an average #, tracking progress could be confusing.
lazur1 11 months ago
Comment removed
MRDOLCE247 1 year ago
Too easy to fool yourself that you are maximally contracting. How do you measure progress?
xanthromera 1 year ago
That looks really bad for your back.
Carnuss 2 years ago
how much was that thing
Freerunner1212 2 years ago
Cute little boy, but why was he allowed in the training area?
senatus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Cute little boy, but why was he allowed in the training area? "
Particularly if that was a paying client.
Yes -- cute kid.
PencilsAreAwesome 2 years ago
I know that traditionally resisted slow reps must keep times fast enough to avoid neural "ratcheting", but I'd think that segmented movement wouldn't be an issue with this technology. If I'm right, couldn't the machine be set for just -one- very long negative? Wouldn't it be more efficient to eliminate the "unweighted" 1/2-rep?
lazur1 2 years ago