Floyd Mayweather Jr. Beats Sugar Ray Leonard Revisited

[kdually14]

Hey oral, why don't you make a video of all the times Mayweather gets hit and expose his "flaws"...

[kdually14]

Who did Mayweather fight that was comparable to Leonard? Leonard fought greater opponents, opposition, had greater speed, and was just a better fighter overall.

You know for a fact Leonard would've fought all the big threats in this era by now... I doubt the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight will ever pop off.

[yashar254]

see most mafuckas don't know about boxing. it takes skills mixed with natural talent to be great.

it takes footwork, defense, head movement, balance, offense, countering, ring generalship, inside fighting, outside fighting, fighting in angles(left and right of the oppenent) and these are the skills of boxing then you have your natural talent of power in both hands, one punch k.o. power, hand speed, accuracy, slickness, intelligence. floyd has show to have most of this thats why he is the best!

[324582782]

sugar ray leonard was a very fast boxer with little defense, Mayweather is just as fast as leonard with great defense and ring general ship

This fight would end up like mayweather's fight with mosley if leonard chooses to stand and fight. If leonard wants to move and fight, even then hell loose.

[InternationalBoy]

@324582782 mosley and Leonard are nothng alike.....smh

[kdually14]

@324582782

Mayweather is "not as fast" as Leonard. At welterweight there is no way mayweather is fast as him. and Mosley is NOTHING like Leonard, especially not that old version of Mosley. Mosley is more of a puncher then Leonard. Leonard wrecked Mayweather Sr, who was comparable in style to Leonard. Leonard would win a decision over Mayweather jr.

[324582782]

@kdually14 mayweather jr is a way better boxer than mayweather sr. How will leonard win if he can't land any punch?

[kdually14]

@324582782

I know he is a better boxer then sr. I was comparing them from a STYLE stand point. You really think Leonard can't land a punch? Well, De La Hoya did, Judah did, Mosley did, Ortiz did, Corley did, and Baldomir did. Floyd isn't untouchable like you think he is.

[324582782]

@kdually14 Oscar de la hoya missed 84 % of his punches landed only 16 %, None of them was a clean shot

Judah won first 2 rounds and then was dominated for the next 10 rounds

Ortiz had no control in the fight and was being out worked

mosley just got a lucky punch in and after looked like an ordinary fighter

Any fighter that gets in the ring, gets hit but he barely been caught by good punches and always in control of fight, While leonard barely won his fight against hearns and other fighters.

[324582782]

@kdually14 Leonard is an outside fighter, and a terrible inside fighter, While mayweather can take it inside and outside without getting hit. I can't see leonard winning a single round against mayweather. Let Alone winning a fight.

[kdually14]

@324582782

you're acting as though Mayweather is some superhuman that can't be hit. I just proved to you that he got hit a bunch of times. Leonard isn't that bad of an inside fighter, he actually had good spots on the inside against Duran who's a far superior fighter to Floyd. A single round, huh? Like I said, Mosley, Judah, Ortiz, and De la Hoya won ROUNDS against Floyd, so really you saying that he "won't win a round" is pretty much cringeworthy. has me shaking my head to be honest.

[324582782]

@kdually14 Mosley won 1 round

Judah won 2 rounds

De la hoya won 3 rounds

That shows that mayweather didnot really face any trouble with these fighters, He figured them out quick and then out boxed them. Sugar ray leonard makes too many errors in the ring and he fights with one style for all 12 rounds, Mayweather will eventually figure him out and make him. Mayweather is a not a super human, but probably the most skillful boxer of all time and you cannot out box him.

[kdually14]

@324582782

Lol, I'm sorry but you're all over Mayweather's nuts here. Most skilled fighter of all time? LOL. The issue is you also fail to see Mayweather's "mistakes". Yet you try to exploit Leonards. Leonard had very few mistakes, and he has the resume to prove it.

[Kaito66666]

@kdually14 YOU DONT KNOW SHIT BOUT BOXING NIGGAZ

[shankthatup]

@324582782 Moron , mosley won 2 , judah 3-4 , and dlh got a split decision you retard i dont mind you supporting mayweather but doit with evidence not ignorance

[324582782]

@shankthatup WOW big deal?. I can't believe you actually messaged me just to say i was off by one round. Mayweather controlled the whole fight with all of them and the split decision was just a bullshit. Mayweather gave oscar boxing lessons. How could he get split decision when he missed 80 + % of his punches?. the only reason fight went to split decision is because the crowd and judges were supporting oscar.

[blacktee31]

@shankthatup Wrong, Judah won 2 rounds at best.

[324582782]

@kdually14 mayweather would embarass leonard, Just like he would do to duran or hearns. They all make too many mistakes to stand a chance against mayweather.

[kdually14]

@324582782

There's no way Mayweather beats any of them. he doesn't have the resume to prove it. Hearns would absolutely destroy Mayweather with his reach, power, size, speed, combinations, and ability. Duran's versatility, inside ability, jab, combos, and overall style would've owned Leonard.

[324582782]

@kdually14 leonard has very few mistakes? are you kidding me? . And some how you see mayweather's mistakes? What are those mitakes i would love to know. Mayweather has fought fighter similar to hearns height n style and dominated them, Same with duran. Leonard has no defense what so ever. he keeps his hands down and brings them down when jabs, Mayweather will make him pay everytime he makes a mistake. He got all the tools to take care of duran, leonard, hearns.

[blacktee31]

@kdually14 Styles make fights not resumes.

[kdually14]

@blacktee31

I'm aware. What's your point? Leonard is more proven, and it's not like Mayweather would ever beat Duran, Hagler, Hearns, or Benitez.

[blacktee31]

@kdually14 Apparently not, because you're still talking about other fighters and not what Floyd and Leonard would do if they met in the ring. I'll say it again, styles make fights not resumes so stop using names just to say leonard is more proven.

[kdually14]

@blacktee31

I consider Leonard a much higher caliber fighter just based on the fact that he fought those guys and the fact that Floyd has somehow avoided the biggest fights in his career. I'm aware styles make fights. Leonard was able to negate Benitez defense so I don't see why he wouldn't be able to deal with Floyd's.

Leonard is faster, stronger, and hits harder then Mayweather. I don't see how Mayweather would win at all. If you think Floyd wins, that's your opinion. I think Floyd gets beat.

[blacktee31]

@kdually14 Floyd hasn't avoided anything. You can conisder him a higher caliber fighter, that's fine, but that doesn't decide who wins or loses. Benitez's defense is different from Floyd.

[blacktee31]

@kdually14 I dont know what's up with this thing cutting my character count short lol. But like I was saying Floyd is good at finding a fighter's tell and he'll exploit that.

[willsmackyoudown]

@kdually14

Mayweathers about to get hit a whole lot more if he ever agrees to this pacman fight.

[bscottdp]

Ray was very rusty in the Howard fight after the 3 year layoff. Larry Merchant during the fight brings up Ray looks apprehensive to getting hit and was not willing to engage at times. Meaning stay in close quarters to counterpunch. When your fighting on a regular basis your more used to staying within striking distance in order to land your shots.

[bscottdp]

The Kevin Howard knockdown was not from a weakness to the straight right. It was Ray clowing on his toes and just got embarassed. Also after a threeyear layof The Pete Ranzany video. Ray dominated that fight. Your showing 1 punch Pete landed. The Bruce Finch fight. You post 1 shot that Bruce landed. Ray knocked him out in the 3rd round. Marcus Geraldo was a middleweight who was 6-1. Ray had problems with the reach early. He still dominated the fight

[tfgrudin]

Most of the clips that you show Ray Leonard's flaws are early in those bouts. There are a lot of welterweights Mayweather beats Leonard is not one of them. It would be very close but I think Leonard would be slightly better over 12/15 rounds.

[OralLepercy]

@tfgrudin

nope, these videso are after his first title fight, and most are after the wilfred beneitez fight.

I also made sure to get videos of ray in his prime.

[tfgrudin]

@OralLepercy When I said the clips were early, I meant that they were were the early rounds of those fights. Not the early fights of his career.

[j2011carter]

Name of the 2nd instrumental?

[WOTGSmash]

Great video, I don't see how anyone can refute now. "Floyd fought a bunch of bums in comparison." So all the fighters Ray fought were ATGs? Including the ones shown here? LOL. Kevin Howard was a bum and put Ray Leonard on his ass just by using a counter-right. The point is that Ray Leonard, like every other great, is human, does have flaws, and isn't an indestructible force in comparison to today's fighters.

[SalidoTheGreat]

Hmm...decent vid but your "Low Left" argument is kinda flawed. When Floyd jab's to the body, he too brings his left back low (which is more dangerous considering how low and exposed Floyd's chin is after he throws the jab). Youtube search "Floyd Mayweather's jab to the body" and you'll see what I mean. The only reason FMJ gets away with it is because of his super speed/reflexes, same reason SRL got away with it...

[OralLepercy]

@SalidoTheGreat

True

but, its different when you jab to the body as opposed to the head.

when he throws it he instantly darts out of range. he doesn't stay. When you throw a regular jab you want to back the guy up so your moving forward or being stationary. so if you bring it back low your still in punching range. the body jab is to make the guy reset or it gives you space and works the same way other body shots work. I know its ray style to keep his left low, but he forgets to roll or block

[OralLepercy]

@SalidoTheGreat

also not many fighters expect to be jab to the body, they instinctively block there head or bring there arms down to protect the midsection. before they realize whats going on floyds out of range or to low for punches to be effective. Also punching down takes power off your punches ontop of the the jab pushes you back a bit. you watch close you can see baldomir and castillo attempt to punch floyd, but they can't reach him.

[OralLepercy]

@SalidoTheGreat

also, the thing is Leonard always has his left hand to his waist, not just when he jabs. he eats lead rights as well as right counters also hooks if you fast enough. I think the easiest way to catch him cleanly is when he throws his jab. this can be offset if Leonard doubles up, but he rarely does. If your not fast enough to counter him, you can double jab straight right. i wish there wasn't a character limit. would have put all this in one post. don't want to miss anything.

[thetruthcity1]

ill ask anyone to tell me how srl beats floyd with skills not because you believe he can but why can he because these 2 vids give prime examples of why floyd would be able to do to srl what he has done to others using the same tools he used against others. so dont hate on orallepercy instead share why you think floyd wouldn't be able to use those tools.

[WOTGSmash]

@thetruthcity1 They can't lol, they'll just go on and on about how amazing Ray Leonard was without making a non-biased comparison. In reality, Ray Leonard and many other greats had many flaws that Floyd Mayweather Jr. CAN exploit to his victory.

[thetruthcity1]

@WOTGSmash shit i know man thats why i said it lol. they always will tell you who can beat floyd but they never know how but we can always explain how floyd can beat his op lol

[MrLouieG]

@thetruthcity1 so tell us how will floyd beat pacquiao because you said you can always explain how floyd can beat his oponent.

[j2011carter]

@MrLouieG Pacquiao would be an easy win for Floyd. Pac has no jab, no defense, no head movement, his footwork is sloppy & predictable, & he,s been beaten by guys with superior boxing ability & skill. His arms are too short to try & box Floyd, so he would have to press the action, & at that point, it's open season for Money.

[MrLouieG]

@j2011carter floyd would be an easy win for pacquiao.floyd does not parr with southpaws.he does not know how to attack a southpaw in which it is a must if your opponent is a southpaw.he does not have enough power to hurt pacquiao.his chin will not be able to take pacquiao's punches.he exposes his body.he does not have the guts to fight back when hurt.easy win for pacquiao.

[j2011carter]

@MrLouieG Floyd does not parr with southpaws? Yet he's beaten every single southpaw he has ever faced. He just knocked a 170 pound south paw out in the 4th round. What makes you think a 145 pound Pacquiao will do? His chin wont be able to take Pacquiao's punch, yet he was able to take Mosley's best shot, & Shane hits harder than Manny. He doesn't have the guts to fight back when he's hurt? When has Floyd ever ben hurt? Dude, u kno u only want Pac to win with your heart, u have no facts

[MrLouieG]

@j2011carter yes agreed he has beaten southpaws but he can't afford to perform the same way with pacquiao.he knocked out ortiz?(with a sucker punch...please give me a break flomo).he took mosley's shot yeah i agree but my point is different.he got to fight back even at the moment he is hurt like what marquez did.he can't afford to have a breather.shane said it himself,pacquiao is not heavy handed but he can hurt you very dizzy when he hits you in the head.who got facts?!LOL!

[j2011carter]

@MrLouieG Floyd's been undefeated for 17 years, there has been no style he has not seen yet. Pacquiao's agression is going to play right into Floyd's hands. Or maybe Floyd will be the aggressor as he's been in his recent fights. If you have no defense or head movement, you can't expect to win with a live opponent. Look what marquez did to em.

[MrLouieG]

@j2011carter of course there is.mosley displayed it.he just does not have the youth to sustain it.oscar also showed it but the same thing.he does not have the youth to keep going.floyd ducked a lot of fighter that could have beat him.

[j2011carter]

@MrLouieG What fighters did he duck that could have beat him? I'll wait. Oscar was an easy win for Floyd. Oscar only won 4 Rounds. Mosley only won 1. Pacquiao has 6 losses & he just got his ass beat by a counter punching boxer with a good defense in Marquez. Who is the greatest counter puncher in boxing. Who has the greatest defense in boxing? Floyd does. I can tell your passionate about Manny, but on paper, there's no way he beats Floyd. But fights are won in the ring, not on paper.

[MrLouieG]

@j2011carter even if you are a better counterpuncher than floyd you still can't beat pacquiao.you should be both a great counterpuncher and great attacker to beat pacquiao.floyd ducked many fighters but for the sake of discussion i will consider cotto as a trully legit fight for floyd because they are equal in size.cotto got the attributes to beat floyd that is why he was ducked.i am not passionate about manny,you are obssessed with floyd.oscar won that fight.senior said it himself.

[j2011carter]

@MrLouieG dude, you're an idiot.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG Your logic doesn't make sense. You witnessed how Marquez, much slower, smaller, and in terms weaker in strength compared to Floyd, put on a boxing "counter-punching" clinic on Pacquiao, and arguably should of won all three fights, but still imply Mayweather has no chance? I bet you can't even explain how Cotto would beat Floyd. Btw, Floyd Sr. said he would of lost if they used Amateur scoring, which is different from Professional scoring. Stop posting, troll.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash you definitely don't know boxing because senior mentioned the ten point system and amateur is not using this system.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG No he didn't, he was referring to the amateur point system, said nothing about round scoring. You need to go back and watch the tapes.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash he exactly said ten point system and not amateur system.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG /watch?v=OX5cfFJuwDo&feature=r­elated is the video where Sr. speaks. Speaks between 7:41 - 9:10. Show me where he says "ten point system" He clearly says, and I quote "Well I'm just gon be honest with chu man, uh... If you wanna call a fight by scoring...point system, I mean by who throwin the more punches, you gon have to give it to Oscar. But if you just goin on, a guy hittin a guy with single shots, then you have to give it to my son."

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash so what does he mean by point system?in your opinion?

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG He's talking about amateur scoring, clearly. Look up the difference between how they're scored. No way does that explanation refer to professional scoring.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash that is what you think?i won't argue.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG It's not what I "think" that's what it clearly is. What else would it be?

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash ten point system...the first rule says the guy with the most number of clean punches landed.(it does not matter solid or not).don't proceed to second rule unless tied.second rule is ring generalship and/or effective aggressiveness.don't proceed to third rule unless equal.third rule is defense.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG There is no official order in which is important to score a fight, except for clean effective punches, which commonly should matter most. "(it does not matter solid or not)" that doesn't even make sense, because then defense wouldn't even matter. Why would he be referring to the ten point round scoring system, if hes claiming Oscar would of won just for throwing punches based upon "a point system". His statement wouldn't make sense then.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash then you don't know the ten point system.a judge may or may not follow the ten point system.in judging the fight the judge can over rule the ten point system in case there are very significant punches landed by the boxer even if he had fewer clean punches landed.the judge always consider the objective part which is the ten point system and the subjective part which is who gives the most damage eventhough he lost technically on the ten point system.obviously you don't know.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG A judge may or may not follow the ten point system? What the hell are you even talking about? The ten point scoring system is just to avail who wins round by round. Each round is scored by effective punches, ring generalship, controlling the pace; the judges are supposed to score knockdowns, and are allowed to score defense, blood, and bruising. When scoring you decide who deserves to get a 10 (win) for the round, who else gets a 9, 8, 7, or 6 (lowest you can go).

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash first read the ten point system.read all the details then you can talk to me.obviously you don't know the details of it.you just happen to know it by someone else.you are just telling me the summary.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash what you know about the ten point system is what you seen in hbo programs.you don't know that what they are showing are just a summary.there are more of it.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG What?

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash i ask you a question.boxer A scored 2 clean and not solid punches.boxer B scored 1 clean very solid punch that wobbled fighter A and almost went down.based strictly on the ten point system who got the round?

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG Hypothetically boxer B would win the round, because he landed the more effective punch(es). Why are you saying this to me?? btw, is english not your first language? no offense, just starting to make sense now.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash LOL!i am not asking about hypothesis.i am asking about strictly on ten point system rules.what is the answer?

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG Okay, clearly I can't communicate with you, because you don't understand english very well.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash i can't or you just can't answer my question.it is a simple question.strictly on "Ten Point System" who wins the round?is it Boxer A or Boxer B?

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG I've already answered your question. You don't understand it, because you don't understand the english language very well.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash you answered me "hypothetically".i want the technical answer and not the hypothetical answer.do you have the technical answer basing on the exact definition of the ten point system?

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG Your question is not technical, it is hypothetically speaking because you are asking around the idea if only three punches were thrown in the round, something that's not possible, or very much unlikely, so it's theoretically. So as I said before, hypothetically Boxer B would win the round because he's landed a punch that was much more effective than Boxer A's two punches. And I ask again, why are you even asking me this?

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash i am asking you this if you know the exact technical definition of the Ten Point System.my question is exactly technical.i gave you a scenario and i asked you a technical question based on the scenario itself.you refused to answer technically.i want a technical answer.are you stupid?LOL!

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG Do yourself a favor, go to dictionary . com website, search "technically" and "theoretically" because you don't understand what they mean. Your question doesn't even have anything to do with defining the definition of the ten-point must system. Your giving a hypothetical "scenario" and asking for an answer of who would win based on this system. You're not asking how the system works, you're asking who would win the scenario using the ten point system.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG lol clearly you're stupid and are butchering the language by how stupid you are.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash a scenario could never be a hypothesis because hypothesis means intelligent or scientific guess base on the given data.the scenario is the data itself and not the hypothesis.so why are you saying "hypothetical scenario" in which it is very erronous.you are surely stupid.LOL!

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG saying hypothetically is another way of saying theoretically, it doesn't have to be scientific. It's hypothetical because your scenario isn't realistic, so it's "in theory." You're not even a good troll because you are retarded beyond belief.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG Lol you're straying so far from the original subject because you know I'm right.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash the scenario i gave you can never be theoretical.i think it is you who can't understand english.you are always wrong and you are stupid.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG lol I'm right on everything I say and do because I know everything there is to know, for i am god. you are always wrong and you are stupid.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG He continues, "...I mean my son, he had good defense, I'm not sayin lot...he caught a lot of punches with his shoulders and his arms, but...uh (Merchant trying to interrupt) ...it's still about punches...it's about peopl..a guy throwin punches..as long as a guy touch.. (Merchant still trying to interrupt) ..as long a guy touching you, hes scoring." Merchant goes on asking to repeat, trying to make it more clear...

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG Sr. responds, "You know, it, I thought the fight was a close fight, but I, and man you know its just what the point system goes, man, you know..if you look at the point system, man, who touchin who the most... (Merchant interrupts, "Oscar or Floyd, who won?") Sr. responds, "Hey man, I, if you go by point system, you gon have to give it to Oscar if you goin by point system, that's all I got to say." So where does he say "ten point system" aka "round" scoring?

[thetruthcity1]

@MrLouieG lmao if you cant see it you dont know shit about boxing thats why just about every professional boxer or trainer says floyd beats pac man. matter of fact pac man is the best match up for floyd his aggressive inaccurate style is perfect for a fast strong counter puncher with reach. he will beat him the same way marquez just did hahaha.

[MrLouieG]

@thetruthcity1 those professional boxers and trainers are no good.if they are good they could have made their name already.let us just asks the few great people what is their take.let us start with holyfield.LOL!

[BoxingBell]

@MrLouieG I think Floyd's cock is larger and blacker than Sugar Ray Lenards. So obviously he would win in a fight.

[MrLouieG]

@BoxingBell it is not about the cock of a guy that makes him tough.the cock is for sex while the balls are for fighting.

[thetruthcity1]

@MrLouieG you talk with know facts all opinion you have know idea what trainers or fighters im speaking of so how could you say they are no good? if they are in the public eye and being asked about floyd and manny they have some type of recognition but the only trainer you probably give credit to is freedy roach. you have already proved my point you cant tell me anyway how he looses they fight all you can do is tell me he looses.

[MrLouieG]

@thetruthcity1 i know what it takes to beat pacquiao and i know what it takes to beat floyd.i assure you floyd can't beat pacquiao.to beat pacquiao you counter but you don't run away.you stay inside until pacquiao backs off.as soon as he backs off attack him.floyd can never do that to pacquiao.

[thetruthcity1]

@MrLouieG ok so you know how to beat the guy who hasn't been beat as a professional but no great trainer or great fighter can figure it out?

[MrLouieG]

@thetruthcity1 LOL!roach and richardson knows how to beat floyd and probably others but they just don't have the tools.cotto and pacquiao are the right tools.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG What does it take to beat Floyd? How will Pacquiao beat Floyd? Why can't Floyd do that? Why can Marquez, but not Floyd? You don't make sense.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash what does it take to beat floyd?a guy with power and decent footwork.to beat pacquiao?a guy with granite chin and great offense.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG lol... I guess Morales and Marquez both had granite chins and great offense, even though both are more defensive fighters. If you think a guy with power and footwork is all it takes to beat Floyd than that sums it up on how much you know.

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash since when did he face that kind of guy?it was the first and the last time and it was mosley.he almost went down.mosley's age just caught up with him.he can't finish what richardson planned out.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG He was most notably hit hard and staggered by Mosley, Judah, and Corley. Many other opponents he faced hit just as hard or harder than some of them and couldn't score similar blows, so suggesting it only takes an opponent with power to win is dumb... I mean it doesn't take a genius to figure this stuff out. Is it really that shady for you?

[MrLouieG]

@WOTGSmash how can i converse with you when you even don't know how to judge a fight.learn the basics first before starting an argument.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG You don't even know what you're talking about. And I bet you're going to respond and pretend like you do, or will either not respond, thinking you proved something.

[floopehobaloobie]

Floyd Is the P4P king! he will probly fight Martinez after his stint! Sergio holds his right hand low!

[MrLouieG]

bums back then were better than floydie.

[WOTGSmash]

@MrLouieG you crack me up

[bosdurgen74]

Great vid... Shows Ray struggling with fighters that are not ATG's... What are these "RESUME" clowns gonna say now??? Only time will tell!

[PGKING911]

Great vid!! Floyd beats little afro/gerri curl Ray all day... may have a problem w/ low cut (haircut) SRL tho imo

[OralLepercy]

@PGKING911

low cut ray is past his prime ray, the guy the hector and norris murdered.

[BoxingWasp3]

if srl had floyds personality and fighting like this there is no way people would say he'd beat floyd. people hate that floyd says he's the best so people jump at anybody to say they'd beat him.

[OralLepercy]

@BoxingWasp3

Yeah, there's a bit of nostalgia that goes along with that as well.

[atown27]

SRL is a all time great. And he fought in some great fights. SRL is also a beloved fighter by the public. I love Sugar Ray leonard lol.. But Mayweather is more technically sound the SRL. He would frustrate SRL. And land straight rights all day. Great Videos! I got a debate started with these videos on facebook.

[SKILLvsPILLS]

It's not about what you can do, it's what can be done to you! Defense wins Championships!

[bimmer666]

SRL would be no big deal for Mayweather. SRL was great at his time... compared to Mayweather nowerdays, he wouldnt stand a chance. I think he would loose to a lot of the greats nowerdays.

[777MexicanPride777]

Floyd is the king of Elbow using,watch all his fights and you will see he used his elbows everytime

[J9Y2A]

@777MexicanPride777 Well he's beat 2 legendary mexicans... Marquez and Castillo

So fallback hater...

[777MexicanPride777]

@J9Y2A i wouldn't say the best. to say the best you have to mention other fighters.

[777MexicanPride777]

let's be honest,who has Mayweather fought? no one,so how can you compare him to SRL??

[italkshyt14]

Wow this is a complicated debate, but if a had to choose I would choose Mayweather because his skills are superior.

[Belize2787]

Nice video! I think Floyd would break SRL down! People say Floyd is just all talk but I honestly think SRL was just the Oscar De La Hoya of his day! Great skill but mostly a commercialized boxer that can be taken out of his game easily! Floyd on the other hand, is the guy that can take his opponents out of their game & off their rhythm! Floyd has the skill set, stamina & mental toughness to beat SRL!

[hdboxing1]

i agree with this vid 100%

[bgeezy305]

Floyd is a better skilled fighter than sugar ray..nobody in history has complete better skills than floyd

[bertmarx4ever]

if bruce blitz said mayweather wouldn't win.. then he wouldn't win.. period

[OralLepercy]

@bertmarx4ever

bruce full of shit. I don't mind people saying SRL would win, but don't sit up here and say floyd has no chance.

[bertmarx4ever]

@OralLepercy i know right.. that dude is a cornball

[htv122]

@OralLepercy Honesty fuck having a chance I believe Floyd would win hands down in my opinion. SMH they like to criticize the fighters of today like every fighter that laced up a pair of Gloves in the past would have dominated now. When in all actuality only some fighters would be champions. They don't even Judge fighters by the same standards that they judge Floyd by. SRR was hardly challenged in his day he was that good. He made it look easy. So by their standard's he ain't fight nobody either!

[oldschoolraptor]

@htv122 I know man i fuckin agree

[jesusneverexisted300]

@OralLepercy: LOL! Man you sure know how to keep it going. Y'all are relentless.

[MrIknowboxing]

@bertmarx4ever YEA UR SUCKING BRUCES DICK ORAL KNOWS MORE BOUT BOXING

[bertmarx4ever]

@MrIknowboxing sarcasm faggott..

[DGDUKEDG]

@bertmarx4ever if bruce blitz said jump off a building you would prob do it....! bruce blitz is full of shit he has one view on everything and thinks anything other is just down right insane...! plus he's a pussy not man enuff to let people post there opinions he don't want to let his fans see what real muthafucka's think about his thoughts FUCK HIM!

[bertmarx4ever]

@DGDUKEDG sarcasm.. yall dudes take everything too literal all the time.. fuck bruce blitz

[DGDUKEDG]

@bertmarx4ever oh my bad bro lmao!

[bertmarx4ever]

@DGDUKEDG its cool

[OuttaControlTroll]

@bertmarx4ever rofl

[bertmarx4ever]

@OuttaControlTroll lol he made a 3 hour video and then some extra part lmao

[Mike9798999]

@bertmarx4ever you just showed you dont have a brain of your own smh

[bertmarx4ever]

i likeeeeeee it...

[floopehobaloobie]

Good post once again!