@gmcclelland1992 because mr fusion only powers the flux capacitor but the delorean does nead GAS so it would not be usefull for us because we would still pay for GAS any way. so thats why they didint invent it
@sindre101 The actress was not able to come back for some reason when filming 2 and 3 so they had to get a replacement. She still represents the same character
@daman2344 no different characters i think. just like karate kid had a different gf in each episode, but she was the same character pretty much - someone to stand by his side
I'm a huge fan of SCI-FI and Adventure movies. Back To the Future is pure classic - interesting storyline, great acting and visual effects. Michael J.Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Lea Thompson and Crispin Glover did a great job. I miss the 80's and its sci-fi/adventure films - Back to the Future , Aliens, Empire Strikes Back, RoboCop, Mad Max 2 & 3, Ghostbusters, Rambo trilogy, Batman, DeepStarSix, Romancing the Stone, low budget films Sheena, Masters of the Universe, Elvira Mistress of the Dark etc
@silverhawkflash in the version of this scene thats at the end of the first one, he didnt hesitate. he just said no u both turn out fine immediately...not sure why its in this one....
back to the future part 2 is 89, watching it right now. & anybody notice that the jennifers are different? part 1 is some woman and part 2 is elizabeth shue.
@ambbbbbbbber in the first one, Jennifer was portrayed by Claudia Wells. She doesn't have that much acting work under her belt but I consider her to be the better looking one out of the two.
@kargaroc386 She's used for a couple scenes in the second movie. Mostly in the future and when they return to 1985, then she's gone till the end of the 3rd movie.
In fact they do need roads. Where were all of those hovering cars driving? On a road. Where did the hoverboard chase take place? On a road. How were they driving? Like they were on a road.
Actually if you notice throughout the 2nd and 3rd films...EVERYTIME Marty gets called a chicken and doesn't back down....the consequences that happen get worse and worse.
@Nayon1 Everybody noticed that......thats a part of the trilogy that was meant to stand out. Just as his "mom" is always there when he wakes up. Be it past future and....past past lol.
if you ask some one who actully saw the movies when they came out... like my dad. he says that bttf part 2 came out in 1987. decide wikipedia is a fucked up site...
They were made back to back. Back to the future part II hit theaters in Nov. 1989 and Back to the future Part III hit theaters in May 1990. It's in Wwikipedia if you want to check it out.
@danyphat1 part 2 came out in 87...not 89. Thats a fact. Wikipedia is made my avg people like you and me. Heck if you wiki yourself, it'll probably say you were a wild gunman in the wild west who invented toothpaste....
@kevinbaconisbest Because Bob Zemeckis wanted to kill two birds with one stone. In fact, up until that point, the only other time it had been done was with the first two "Superman" movies. The only difference was that Zemeckis didn't get fired from the sequel like Richard Donner did from "Superman II." Then again, I suspect Spielberg was easier to work with than the Salkinds--just barely.
Oh it wasn't that bad. Stop hating over everything! It's practically the same thing, whether it's original or not, except they changed the frikken car actions. -_-
Big deal. And of course the original is better than this. Maybe it was made for fun? Do I really have to point this out to you people?
I've always thought he might have added in that expression because of the events to come in the 2nd movie, where in the future they really are "assholes or something". When they made the first movie they didn't know there was going to be a sequel, but once they had a story outlined, they could add that expression in.
That was another strage point. Marty of 2015 IS an asshole because of his thing with being called "Chicken"
Yet nothing in the first movie remotely HINTED at Marty having such a problem. Why they just couldnt show 2015 Marty as actually becoming the superstar he was clearly implied to become instead of destroying his life. Why would they show that the hero was destined to live such a miserable life.
I mean I love the movies but the whole "Chicken" thing seemed out of the blue.
But that's a major plot point for the third film. After his brush with death facing Mad Dog Tannen, Marty actually learns he is being a jerk with his stubborn refusal to back down when called chicken. It's because of that one event, that at the end of the third film he doesn't play along with the road race and changes his future by not ramming the Rolls Royce... therefore destroying the original timeline that led to him being a loser. The future is once again fluid and unwritten.
O man can't wait for 2015!!!!!
zeke2852 4 days ago
2012 and still no flying cars :(
crybabygirl08 2 weeks ago
Only 3 years left before we somehow invent practical, affordable, compact fusion reactors and hover technology.
Damecos 3 weeks ago
why all oh sudin when i see the dalorean its in cartoon
fantage244 3 weeks ago
Destery Version:
"Roads?! Where we're going, we don't need roads!" *Takes out toy car and waves it around* Psheewwwwww!!!
AngelGirl1591 3 weeks ago
u speeded it up
backtothefuture1004 2 months ago
WILL SOMEBODY TELL WHERE TO FIND THE ORIGINAL WITH NO EDITING!!!
Alex2424121 3 months ago
The graphics of the 80s.... what to say, they were their own kind of special XD
aryllia 3 months ago
"I NEED FUEL" Why the hell to we still not have Mr. Fusions. Less apple products and more damn cold fusion research dammit!
gmcclelland1992 3 months ago in playlist gmcclelland1992's favorites 2
@gmcclelland1992 because mr fusion only powers the flux capacitor but the delorean does nead GAS so it would not be usefull for us because we would still pay for GAS any way. so thats why they didint invent it
MrTheguimauve 1 month ago
Elizabeth Shue.... mehhhh
Shirishama1 4 months ago
I luv that look Doc gives Marty when he says assholes. Like he had to analyse if Marty was an asshole in the future haha
PetShopMod 4 months ago 2
what the hell did marty do in 1955 to screw up hot jennifer
gc3k 4 months ago
i never knew that that wasnt Crispin Glover until today
MrBackoftheface 5 months ago
Why quick? they have alot of time. ;)
pkmovies92 5 months ago
The best trilogy of ever
UltraMike4Ever 5 months ago
Is the computer animation from a Back To The Future computer game?
PolishExplorer 6 months ago
At 00:42 is animation not an actual scene of the movie.
PolishExplorer 6 months ago
cool movie but the delorean didnt sell in real life, looked like cheap garbage only available to ghetto booty
ericwaffle31 7 months ago
why does marty have another girlfriend? look at the end of bttf 1 and look at the begining of bttf 2.
sindre101 8 months ago
@sindre101 The actress was not able to come back for some reason when filming 2 and 3 so they had to get a replacement. She still represents the same character
daman2344 7 months ago
@daman2344 no different characters i think. just like karate kid had a different gf in each episode, but she was the same character pretty much - someone to stand by his side
ericwaffle31 7 months ago
what mod???
Backscrachter 9 months ago
biff : man i want one of those O.o
FredAndGeorgeFan1 9 months ago
Marty: What do we become assholes or something?
Doc: (Thinks for a second)
bunnydo22 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm a huge fan of SCI-FI and Adventure movies. Back To the Future is pure classic - interesting storyline, great acting and visual effects. Michael J.Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Lea Thompson and Crispin Glover did a great job. I miss the 80's and its sci-fi/adventure films - Back to the Future , Aliens, Empire Strikes Back, RoboCop, Mad Max 2 & 3, Ghostbusters, Rambo trilogy, Batman, DeepStarSix, Romancing the Stone, low budget films Sheena, Masters of the Universe, Elvira Mistress of the Dark etc
Magnolia296 1 year ago
Love how the Doc has to think about it for a second when Marty asks if they turn out to be assholes!
silverhawkflash 1 year ago 2
@silverhawkflash in the version of this scene thats at the end of the first one, he didnt hesitate. he just said no u both turn out fine immediately...not sure why its in this one....
satmandoo 9 months ago
@satmandoo They probably added it to make it funnier. It's subtle, so observant people are rewarded.
silverhawkflash 9 months ago
anybody else feel sorry for biff that no-one really likes him?
carbonfootprintmyass 1 year ago
back to the future part 2 is 89, watching it right now. & anybody notice that the jennifers are different? part 1 is some woman and part 2 is elizabeth shue.
ambbbbbbbber 1 year ago
@ambbbbbbbber in the first one, Jennifer was portrayed by Claudia Wells. She doesn't have that much acting work under her belt but I consider her to be the better looking one out of the two.
JASONFIED 1 year ago
Or better yet, why not just use the clip from the first movie? Jennifer isn't used at all for the second movie.
kargaroc386 1 year ago
@kargaroc386 She's used for a couple scenes in the second movie. Mostly in the future and when they return to 1985, then she's gone till the end of the 3rd movie.
dungchunker 1 year ago
@dungchunker They should have remade the first movie, so they would match.
legosrule111 1 year ago
@kargaroc386 yes she is and more than in the first
14lanicup 10 months ago
Ahaha he looks at the camera as if to say yes!
noobasdfjkl 1 year ago
In fact they do need roads. Where were all of those hovering cars driving? On a road. Where did the hoverboard chase take place? On a road. How were they driving? Like they were on a road.
aacs4 1 year ago
@aacs4 it was in reference to a john f. kennedy speech. Plus technically they DONT need roads. Its a hovering delorean.
nebulae87 1 year ago
Actually if you notice throughout the 2nd and 3rd films...EVERYTIME Marty gets called a chicken and doesn't back down....the consequences that happen get worse and worse.
Nayon1 1 year ago
@Nayon1 Everybody noticed that......thats a part of the trilogy that was meant to stand out. Just as his "mom" is always there when he wakes up. Be it past future and....past past lol.
nebulae87 1 year ago
I just hope the pedal on his truck doesn't get stuck!
2010mustang2 1 year ago
if you ask some one who actully saw the movies when they came out... like my dad. he says that bttf part 2 came out in 1987. decide wikipedia is a fucked up site...
kevinbaconisbest 1 year ago
thats because any random person can put what they want on it :)
cons789 1 year ago
perfect sync :D love it
erikwilly 1 year ago
no. it's from 1987:D why shold they make two back to the future movies at almost the same time?
kevinbaconisbest 1 year ago
They were made back to back. Back to the future part II hit theaters in Nov. 1989 and Back to the future Part III hit theaters in May 1990. It's in Wwikipedia if you want to check it out.
danyphat1 1 year ago
@danyphat1 part 2 came out in 87...not 89. Thats a fact. Wikipedia is made my avg people like you and me. Heck if you wiki yourself, it'll probably say you were a wild gunman in the wild west who invented toothpaste....
nebulae87 1 year ago
@nebulae87 imdb says 89.
Grrrrtt 1 year ago
@kevinbaconisbest Because Bob Zemeckis wanted to kill two birds with one stone. In fact, up until that point, the only other time it had been done was with the first two "Superman" movies. The only difference was that Zemeckis didn't get fired from the sequel like Richard Donner did from "Superman II." Then again, I suspect Spielberg was easier to work with than the Salkinds--just barely.
cubdukat 1 year ago
bttf part 2 is from 1987:P thats wat my dad says:D
kevinbaconisbest 1 year ago
1987? no.
it is from 1989.
TheSpartanHunter 1 year ago
lol kewl!! i loved it
drahunter213 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we want to fly high?
(2) Why do want to build a flying car?
(3) Why do we like to imagine to drive a flying car? (eg. the flying car in moive "Back To The Future")
(4) If Flying Simulator has a "Flying Ford Family Car" to pilot, will this attractive to players?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 2 years ago
Lives? Where we're going we don't need...lives. (Gets his gun out and kills Marty and Jennifer, before committing suicide).
iDraw3G 2 years ago 33
*back to the future theme and credits roll*
Vykkdraygo713 2 years ago 2
@iDraw3G L-O fukin L! great chuckle outta that 1
DIZZYFP187 1 year ago
@iDraw3G What the.... º_º
henriquedematos 3 months ago
cool dude,LEUHTA should get a life and GET HIS FACTS STRAIGHT!!!! bttf pt.2 was made in 1988 IDIOT!!!!
mattkaythetimelord 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No shit the looked older get out the maps, The first one was filmed in late 1984 into '85. BTTF 2 was filmed in 1989!!!
Leuhta 2 years ago
Actually it was probably filmed in 1988
DamianColucci 2 years ago
In the first Back To The Future jennifier looked younger and in this one she looks older.
getouthemaps 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its a different jennifer in the 1st one
adora0352 2 years ago
buen laburo.. bien hecho.. peroo... este....mm.. que se supone que querian mostrar?.. volver al futuro en version sega?. jaj saludos.
alealito 2 years ago
very good and good work!
SAMBEULINK 2 years ago 6
awesum
aKILLAfromAPK 2 years ago 2
DANG MAN, THAT WAS COOL! Seriously man, I don't care what people think, you did a HECK OF A JOB with this video :D
5/5!
GeneralCuster14 2 years ago
Lives? Where we're going we don't need...lives.
Gets his gun out and shoots Marty and Lorraine, before killing himself.
jmtz1983 2 years ago
this phrase should be used against everybody who plays WoW
SomeUrbanNinja 2 years ago
1:38
titanic19 2 years ago
Oh it wasn't that bad. Stop hating over everything! It's practically the same thing, whether it's original or not, except they changed the frikken car actions. -_-
Big deal. And of course the original is better than this. Maybe it was made for fun? Do I really have to point this out to you people?
Anyways, nice vid. 5/5 =D
jonasbrotherslo 2 years ago
yeah, thanks for the credits.. were glad ya did it
austinmk 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it was so bad i die soon
Piplup1996 2 years ago
usually, id be mad that someone messed ths up. but actually, i have to say that was pretty good. and how did u get tha car in GTA?
chilabob 2 years ago 2
I see what you did there
Ineedhelp2811 3 years ago 2
elizabeth shue is way hotter than the other jennifer
rkmman 3 years ago 3
no way dude, the original jennifer was way hotter~!!!
Biggieman2k6 3 years ago 53
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im sorry but elizabeth shue is way fucking hotter. she doesnt look he best in this movie, but in others she looks damn fine.
watch adventures in babysitting.
rkmman 3 years ago
loved her in "soap dish"
Just looked at the two verions of the scene side by side, Jenn #1 is taller i think, and had longer looser hair, Liz Shue's hair was more set.
etraig 3 years ago 3
i liked the original
NDIrishfan93 3 years ago 2
YES!!! I'm glad someone noticed too!
CLAUDIA WELLS is will always be the original Jennifer
porkisgood4u 2 years ago 2
@Biggieman2k6 Damn straight dude.
noobasdfjkl 1 year ago
@Biggieman2k6 well she may be but now all she is doing is being a voice recording of her former character self
14lanicup 9 months ago
this mod video was created using GTA:BTTF 0.2d 0.2e is out now witch includes wheel folding animations
sonicblade9 3 years ago
i watched thiss on sky movies 2 secs ago
cybertaylor 3 years ago
wow how did you get the car on GTA
danielkane05 3 years ago
I like what you did!
Markeyssc 3 years ago
Was bttf: hill valley really necessary?
LeixVonStewart 3 years ago
Cool how did you do it
MexicanB17 3 years ago
reli reli cool mate 5/5
gezza2k9 3 years ago
1:37 1:44
nyislanders4cups 3 years ago
01:22 - Doc didn't do that expression the first time around. Why put it in? Zemeckis didn't study his own work close enough
ReverendSyn 3 years ago
I've always thought he might have added in that expression because of the events to come in the 2nd movie, where in the future they really are "assholes or something". When they made the first movie they didn't know there was going to be a sequel, but once they had a story outlined, they could add that expression in.
Or something.
Wilkono 3 years ago 4
I see.
That was another strage point. Marty of 2015 IS an asshole because of his thing with being called "Chicken"
Yet nothing in the first movie remotely HINTED at Marty having such a problem. Why they just couldnt show 2015 Marty as actually becoming the superstar he was clearly implied to become instead of destroying his life. Why would they show that the hero was destined to live such a miserable life.
I mean I love the movies but the whole "Chicken" thing seemed out of the blue.
ReverendSyn 3 years ago
But that's a major plot point for the third film. After his brush with death facing Mad Dog Tannen, Marty actually learns he is being a jerk with his stubborn refusal to back down when called chicken. It's because of that one event, that at the end of the third film he doesn't play along with the road race and changes his future by not ramming the Rolls Royce... therefore destroying the original timeline that led to him being a loser. The future is once again fluid and unwritten.
sword4thelord 3 years ago 3
100% perfect explanation.
NMMan 3 years ago 2
@Wilkono that makes sense
partyguy101ify 5 months ago
@ReverendSyn To be fair it was an awesome little detail. I just love how Doc actually had to stop and consider the question for a moment.
Btw I never noticed the scenes were different. I thought they just recycled the same footage.
Jonassoe 4 months ago
Amazing!
Thersonlyone 4 years ago
that was great!
buckshot213 4 years ago
Awesome Wilko. Lol imma try and remake it when wheel animation comes out. Then we can see which is more aweosme-er.
-ThatWalletGuy
Jettix777 4 years ago