Added: 2 years ago
From: 2setufree
Views: 3,072
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "the government regulates the banks" no sir, it's the other way around.

  • As long as the FED is in the wallstreet household, Geithner, Bernanke and Greenspan will never face any charges. Tho i would love to see Geithner crapping his pants and cry like a fucking spoiled brat. Time for an audit, hang those guys, Enough is fucking enough. Scumbags

  • Sadly this has happened countless times with the Fed. They just operate in secrecy and are immune from the Freedom of Information Act. We really do need a Revolution in this country. Our Founding Fathers wouldn't have put up with that for one damn second.

  • "Geithner to face criminal charges?"

    dont hold your breath. the people who MAKE the laws usually dont have to, and usually dont, abide by the laws.

    i could just hear his defense, "sorry guys, type-o, my bad", as the courts nod their head with a smile and an okay...

  • I hope everyone wakes up and there is noplace for these thieves to hide . Drag them from there homes find a tall tree and a short rope . Its time to purge our corrupt government .

  • Drag him and his family out of their homes and do a public execution. That will teach these bankers.

  • I bet the thieving elf will turn out to be a leprechaun and vanish with the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. For that not to be the case other criminal politicians would have to admit they made a mistake when there is a fair chance they are complicit in the scandal for personal profit.

  • Otherwise... GOP / DNC DC mafia business as usual.

  • The banks are also part of the Bilderberg Group.

  • Comment removed

  • You my friend are quite perceptive, could it be that the other Video I have posted Dems running for cover has something to do with the Rats running before the trap is sprung, interesting.

  • Comment removed

  • facing criminal charges?

    HA HA HA

  • Geithner facing criminal charges, yea sure dream on. BTW if anyone wants to see, I did a video telling this story 12 months ago..ZZzzzzz real good media 'broke the story' lol hell I was talking about it a year ago.

  • @davids11131113 at least you were talking about it. good job. and now protect yourself from the currency crisis while everyone else still trusting government.

  • Here's the fucked up thing....no matter what charges or accusations come against this administration, nothing ever seems to get done about it. The judges are bought off, the attorneys drag it out in court....they are all like teflon..nothing sticks to them

  • 1:12 - "Fall 2008." Let's remember which administration was in office then.

  • C'mon now. Lets not turn this into dems vs. repubs. They are ALL a bunch of criminals. We all need to wake up and vote every bum out of office regardless of political party. Lets get some hones people in DC and then we can debate what kind of domestic and foreign policy is best for this country!!!!!!!!

  • I'm just tired of people blaming the current administration for mistakes made before he got into office.

  • Don't you see yet? both parties are the same. Nothing will change in the 2 party system

  • People only seem to notice this when there's a Democrat in charge.

  • @hawanja It matters not - guess who kept him there...

  • It matters insomuch that the same people who are commenting here about how we need to lynch them all are the same people who four years ago voted for the morons who caused this crap.

    You people act like this just suddenly happened on Jan 20th, 2009. Don't know if you've all noticed, but this is the result of years of neglect and bad governance.

    Remember when the Savings and Loans industry went belly up, during daddy Bush's turn? History repeats, huh?

    But somehow, this is all Obama's fualt.

  • @hawanja It is not all Obama's fault - but he did promise us "change we can believe in" - so where is it? As far as I am concerned, he is the Democrat version of Bush. I have opposed both Bush and Obama, and will continue to do so.

  • All one has to do is compare the type, amount, and intensity of scandals from the Bush people to the Obama people. Has Obama even had a real scandal? Not some phony baloney made up tea-birther scandal, a "real" scandal. Is there even one?

    So far, has Obama broken any laws, whatsoever? Yes or no?

    Yet people talk about him like he's the anti-christ, but no one can tell me anything he's even done that's illegal, or even wrong. Where then is all this misplaced anger coming from?

  • @hawanja Actually, Barack Obama has followed Bush in disregarding The Constitution, the law of the land, by enacting unconstitutional laws, and many members of his administration has been out on taxes, and for selfish reasons to boot. It seems you are a mere Obamabot here to defend your cult leader no matter what crimes he commits.

  • God lord, here we go again...

    Which law, EXACTLY, has he passed, which is unconstitutional? The bank bail out? The Stimulus? Let's hear what you got, becasue I have a feeling it's "not very much."

    Because I can name several different things the Bush people did which were unconstitutional and illegal - spying on Americans for instance - but I want to hear what, EXACTLY, Obama has done that is unconstitutional and/or Illegal.

  • illegal wiretaps?

    you mean the ones that obama is continuing? Or do you mean the invasion of privacy from the PATRIOT Act that Pres Obama re-signed into law after they removed the sunset provision, making it a PERMANENT fixture of American life?

  • @LordVigeous666999 Sorry, but if it's in the Patriot Act, then it's not illegal, is it? That is a legit law passed by congress, is it not? Wiretaps of the type that Bush jr. undertook, if it could be proved that is still happening, then yes that would be unconstitutional. I don't like the patriot act either, and I do think it should be repealed - but passing it is not an "unconstitutional," impeachable offense. What's funny is the people who supported that shit are now the ones complaining.

  • I thought you guys always talked about the illegal wiretaps that the PAT Act allows. The PAT Act allows warrentless wiretaps & searches, I thought that was what the lefties biggest complaint was

    and if the GOV passes a law saying they can kill you without trial, I don't think we have to wait for you to disappear one day before we challenge the law

    Far as my view of the PAT act, I like some stuff, but there are provisions, that seem like they target citizens, not terrorists

  • another thing you guys always brought as unconstitutional, gitmo

    We're still capturing terrorists, where do you think Obama is putting these guys up? Hotel Suite?

    I pay pretty close attention to the war, and, all the stuff the lefties bitched about while bush was there, is still going on, the "torture", yeah, still happening. Its just more quite because the media lap dogs support Obama, and its not that they had a problem with torture, they just wanted to make Bush look bad

  • @LordVigeous666999 The Patriot act loosens the restrictions on wiretaps, ture. But what Bush did wrong was to authorize the NSA to perform wiretaps and to bypass the FISA court altogether. That is not allowed, under the patriot act or otherwise. As for Gitmo, perhaps you don't remember last year how they wanted to give a some of them trials, and how the rightwingers then proceeded to lose their minds? Gitmo is open today becasue the Repubs are obstructing it's closure.

  • The PAT Act allows warrantless searches, oh yeah, they have to send you something in 90 days (the check is in the mail, and I'll respect you in the morning)And, if you haven't complained by that point, you're not getting a warrant

    Gitmo can be closed by one guy, count him, one. And maybe one more congressman to take the prisoners into his state, thats it. How are repubs obstructing? Specially seeing as the Dems hold both houses?

    And I wasn't talking about gitmo, I was talking about rendition

  • @LordVigeous666999 As for the Patriot Act, what you describe is a lot different than just ignoring the FISA court altogether, which is what Bush did to citizens, even journalists. For Gitmo, You're making it sound like no moves to close Gitmo whatsoever have been made, and that's just not true. I seem to remember various Republicans making a big deal about "bringing terrorists here" and "making us a target" by incarcerating the people held there on the mainland. Its not as cut and dry as you say

  • yes it as cut and dry as I said. If obama was serious about what he said, he can do it tomorrow. The fact is, he is making a political calculation, he knows most americans don't like the idea, so hes not doing it

    And besides, I care less about gitmo, atleast its honest, what about rendition?

    And about going around FISA, if bush was doing that in violation of the law, gather your evidence, present to the grand jury, and start a trial. IF you can't do that, shut your mouth about it

  • @LordVigeous666999 Ahh so I see.... you really don't care about Gitmo, but you're still complaining about it - why? If the policy doesn't offend your sensibilities, why are you bringing it up? It's true what I said - the conservatives do not want it closed, and are working hard to keep it open. So if you people PREVENT Obama from closing it, that means he's "gone back on a promise," huh? For wiretapping - So it's when Bush does it, it's ok, but when Obama does it suddenly it's not ok?

  • ah, finally. We made it. I thought it would be obvious why I'm bringing this all up

    Obama is doing the same things you condemned Bush for, and if Obama ain't guilty, then Bush ain't guilty. So, like I said, shut your mouth about it, or start going after Obama for it

    Yeah, conservatives don't want gitmo closed, but they can't stop it if the Dems want it. Just like Healthcare, saying repubs obstruct, how? with what? Dems have both houses and the Pres. In what way could repubs stop obama?

  • You're just making excuses. But Obama did do something unconstitutional that Bush did not. The Court will uphold it, but its still unconstitutional. Healthcare

    The congress claims authority under the interstate commerce clause to regulate health Insurance. But interstate commerce of health insurance is banned. You can't say, we're banning it, but because there is so much of it, we can regulate it

    That logic wouldn't stand up to the scrutiny of a 5-year old

  • @LordVigeous666999 He's doing the same things? I don't' think so. Obama stopped the illegal spying, he's giving the terrorists trials, which they should have had in the first place, he's drawing down the Iraq war, he's not spying on journalists, rendition has been stopped, etc. Do not even try to say they are one and the same, becasue they are not. And yes, the Republicans are fighting tooth and nail every step of the way. How many filibusters have those turds thrown up in the last two years?

  • how many filibusters can stop a pres, when he has 60+ vote majority in the senate? Obama just lost his 41st vote, how come he couldn't get past a filibuster then?

    He has not stopped rendition, its more quite because the media isn't jumping up his ass, but its still going on, the only reason repubs and FOX haven't said much about it, is because they agree with it. Which is why you don't know its going on

    and terrorist getting trials? How many that had drones fired up their ass got trials?

  • And before Bush left office, he said we could start drawing down the troops in Iraq in about 2 years, hmm, seem like a similar time frame? Bush just would not commit to a time line, he committed to a goal, and he said we'd probably reach the goal in 2 years, but if we hadn't, he would want us to stay

    Bush did ILLEGAL spying? if you got proof, bring it to the grand jury, and lets see it. You won't do that though, because you have accusation, not proof

  • and rendition again. FOX reported only a few times, because, if they reported every time it happened, you liberals might try and stop it

    Just like when you guys were jumping up Bushes ass about not signing Kyoto, we didn't tell you that Bill Clinton signed it, and that it was sitting on the desk of Congress, and they can vote on it, anytime. Because if we did, you might actually pressure your congressmen to do it

    lucky for us, liberals are as dumb as rocks and ignorant as fuck

  • @LordVigeous666999 Perhaps you forgot about the exec order Obama signed two days after he got into office, which essentially stopped torture, closed down the CIA black sites, and ended the practice of sending people to other countries where they may be tortured? So rendition continues - but people are not being tortured, held in secret prisons, or held indefinitely without legal recourse. This is vastly different that what was happening under the Bush years, don't say it isnt, becasue it is.

  • @LordVigeous666999 Ahh... see the Dems have 60 votes, yet they still can't pass anything, why? Because the Republicans are fillabuster every single damn bill that comes up, that's why. Since you were too lazy to look up how many Filibusters there's been, I looked it up for you. Since the Dems took congress in 2008, the Repbs have filibustered 170 times. The truth is they are merely attempting to block EVERYTHING, then turning around and saying "Obama can't get nothing done." Such Bullshit

  • Goldman Saks owns the Presidency both Bush and Obama. Goldman Saks won getting all their money back and at the same time Paulson and Geithner helped detroy their competitors.The banks, the Federal Reserve, Geitner make Bernie Maddoff look like a SAINT. All should be jailed for cooking the books and destroying the economy. Throw the damn politicians who allowed this to happen and allow the housing market to be destroyed as well. There is very little redeeming value coming out of the Federal GOV.

  • Don't apologize Shep, the Banks do run the country, its painfully obvious

  • "Possible" criminal charges? It should not be a question of it being possible, it should be done, NOW. If this was something any of we "little people" had done, we'd have the FBI/police banging on our doors.

  • Comment removed

  • As usual please Rate, Comment and pass this on, thanks.

  • Favorited, shared with all friends on YT, facebook and Twitter.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more