@lukequixotesanjose Agreed. I wonder if he would have said anything about the hazards of a pure O2 atmosphere *before* January 1967. Hindsight is so 20-20.
Your dumb mutherfucker.....the Russians tracked every fucking Apollo mission each Apollo mission left a reflective disc which can be detected from earth when a laser is beamed on if Apollo was a fake don't you think the Russians woulda came out and disputed it......end your life now your a fucking retard and have made everybody reading this post dumber you fucking moron.......until ignorant bastards like u can build a rocket go to the moon and prove it fake......keep your fucking mouth shut
@jakebrake4343 YOUR FREEDOM, LOL. IF YOU KNOW HOW MUCH YOU ARE OPPRESSED YOU WOULD WEEP. AMERICANS ARE SOME OF THE MOST ENSLAVED PEOPLE ON THE PLANET. THERE ARE NO PEOPLE MORE HOPELESSLY ENSLAVED THAN THOSE WHO FALSELY THINK THEY ARE FREE.
I'm not even going to dignify the theory by watching this garbage. Get professional help or better yet, take the high road and just kill yourself, it'll be a better world if you do.
Operation 'dirty trick' was a proposal. I don't know how you got from it that NASA was prepared to kill one of their own, because the proposal was completely disregarded. NASA would no way kill an astronaut on purpose, they would do anything but. Take a look at Apollo 13...
Then how about CIA you fucking faggot? Would they kill someone like Grissom who not only didn't believe the landing was possibility but he was also saying jokes about it?Would CIA kill someone like Baron and his family because he testified evidence the Apollo1 "accident" could NOT have been an accident?Fucking criminal twat.
spottydog4477@ How sure are you that any info given in this video is not true? Operation Northwoods is a fact!! But lets say we have an ever lasting soul. Would you bet that ever lasting soul on the falsehood of the allegations? Your childs or love ones life maybe? Yes or No? Take the chance an answer. Answer if you are sure. If you do not answer then that is an answer.
@spottydog4477 Unfortunately in this PC age, such practical measures are now frowned upon, and those that would once have been Safely locked away for their own good are now allowed to wander the internet, polluting it with their dribbling rants.
I have a lunar conspiracy theory of my own. Mine is that the US government blew 20 billion dollars over 10+ years and pushed the aerospace, computing, electronics, metallurgy and bio-medicine industries of that country so far forward that they have maintained a lead which they largely hold to this day, and in the process achieved the single greatest feat of mankind and international kudos whilst making their opponents look like amateurs.
Theres your conspiracy, simple isnt it. Dickheads.
This is such a childish argument... like nearly all conspiracy theories. You hinge your entire argument around a presupposition that you take as fact, or simply ignore the odds while barreling onward with your false logic. This time, I think your understanding of the US Government is at fault; you don't seem to understand Bureaucracy very well. A document produced by some individual in the CIA does not constitute intent by the US Government... simply of that individual or committee.
[...] and in classic conspiracy theorist form, you ignore the details that sink your argument. I understand that in the post-9/11, it's all the rage to suggest the US Government will kill any number of its citizens to get a chosen war. It's so lacking in sound proof that it amazes me you take this much time to make a video. Your best proof for this "Cuban invasion" is a document that constitutes a small group's suggestions. IF those suggestions were taken, the document would still be classified.
[...] It's something like suggesting that the US Government was really going to nuke the Korea/China border simply because Douglas McArthur said he'd like to. A juvenile suggestion based on speculation.
I don't want to insult your opinion, just note your lack of logic.
this tragedy is revolting, stupid, absurd! these men died so tragically because of the stupidity and imcopetencia A few more of NASA technicians in época.Eles should never be forgotten, are heroes, martyrs! If they had died tragically in space even though it would be more acceptable, but in a test platform, is unacceptable! And the families? someone thought of the suffering now? I wonder how they are today and say the world will never forget the courage of these men! stay with god!
Now why would they build the massive Saturn 5...If only to launch? and not go to the moon? They went there alrighty! and it insults the memory and sacrifice of not just Apollo 1 crew but all lost in service of Nasa!
this tragedy is revolting, stupid, absurd! these men died so tragically because of the stupidity and imcopetencia A few more of NASA technicians in época.Eles should never be forgotten, are heroes, martyrs! If they had died tragically in space even though it would be more acceptable, but in a test platform, is unacceptable! And the families? someone thought of the suffering now? I wonder how they are today and say the world will never forget the courage of these men! stay with god!
Bastards, this video ought to be pulled off you tube due to the great insult to all of the brave astronauts since the days of Mercury , Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, and The Shuttle.
@StraydogO2 they did do a thing on it, but, thats not all thats out there about these refractors :D you can see them in certain telescopes, visually :D
6:26 Phil Plait is a total asshole- a little bitch-they're wrong-they're wrong-just like a little bitch. Tell me how the ASCENT POD'S lauched off the moon with barely any fuel-no GPS-a little docking window were able to rendez-vous with the CM doing 4000 MPH??????? LOL BULLSHIT LIES U NASA NAZI'S.
@StraydogO2 someone should kick your ass for this shameless false accuse of nasa murdering these men -LOL U DUMB FUCK- NASA WAS COMPOSED OF NAZI WAR CRIMINALS WHO USED JEWS AS SLAVES TO BUILD V2 ROCKETS. THEY SHOULD HAVE ALL BEEN TRIED AT NUREMBERG ASSHOLE. And u have the balls to make it sound as if they were HONORALE MEN. HA-HA FUCKING JOKE-They were Nazi war criminals brought over by the PENTAGON'S PROJECT PAPERCLIP. dumb ass fuck.Look it up Project Paperclip.U know all about it i'm sure.
@StraydogO2 Project Paperclip-a plan conceived by the War-Monger Penta-con to import Nazi Murderer Scientists & administrative Nazi's to free reign in the good ole USA with deleted War Criminal records-jobs with NASA & GE & a dozen other war based corporations. Nazi war criminals were not allowed entry into the US per The President of the US.He was ignored & thousands of nazi war criminals were given jobs,had their histories purged & made a fortune in the USA. What is wrong asshole?ALL FACT DICK
@StraydogO2 Look it up you moronic asshole.Bet u haven't read a book in our sorry fucking life.
SECRET AGENDA by Linda Hunt
Read about all your Nazi War Criminals in NASA asshole.Some of them were even implicated in sabatoging some of the rockets at first.VonBraun loved to beat his little personal slaves.And THOUSANDS of German prisoners were killed,beaten,starved to death & worked to death in the V2 Rocket factories of the Nasa Nazi's BUT make sure they have a job wih nasa when the war ends
@StraydogO2 Bet me Bitchboy lol. YOU r the asshole schmuck.I've been telling you for months-doesn'tit ge thru to u asswipe? Guess not.Just like the fact that we never went to the moon.
BTW why r u all over films that SHOW we never went, Do u tink your dumb ass is going to convince anyone we did? Or does nasa pay nice propaganda wages?LOL
I guess you never did read a book.Try it sometime.
@StraydogO2 Whats the matter asshole? NO COMMENT on your German Nazi Nasa missile specialists? Alot of them were horrendous mass murderers-killing thousands of prisoners to make their V2 rockets. PROJECT PAPERCLIP NAZI'S WELCOMED TO NASA. lol
@StraydogO2 someone should kick your ass for this shameless false accuse of nasa murdering these men -LOL U DUMB FUCK- NASA WAS COMPOSED OF NAZI WAR CRIMINALS WHO USED JEWS AS SLAVES TO BUILD V2 ROCKETS. THEY SHOULD HAVE ALL BEEN TRIED AT NUREMBERG ASSHOLE. And u have the balls to make it sound as if they were HONORALE MEN. HA-HA FUCKING JOKE-They were Nazi war criminals brought over by the PENTAGON'S PROJECT PAPERCLIP. dumb ass fuck.Look it up Project Paperclip.U know all about it i'm sure.
Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
Go read Andrew Chaikin's excellent book "A Man on the Moon" - thoroughly researched, extensive interviews and study done -- which later became the basis of the HBO mini-series "From the Earth to the Moon"; which is also highly recommended.
NASA FAKE SCIENCE In memory of the 3 astronauts that were murdered by Nasa for threatening to expose the Apollo Hoax Virgil Grissom Edward White Roger Chafee Apollo 1 Nasa will be exposed for the lying scum that they are Heil Nazi Nasa Moonlandings Filmed on planet EARTH AREA 51 dreamlandresortdotcom Directed by Kubrik Written by von BRaun the Nazi Produced by the US NWO Govt
@wsee The disinformation program is a colossal success, then. The only ones immune to it all (eventually) are us "conspiracy nuts". lol That's because the truth has a way of leaking out. In the end, the only ones left, will be the evil ones because evil does seem to be winning with the help of their hoards of sychophant believers.
How many CTs have taken this "evidence" to the police, who are compelled to investigate murder - whatever it's dressed up as.
JW is an obsessed psychotic - but here's a thing. Forget the anonymous 'special needs' types on these threads, JW has put his name on every aspect of NASA research that can be trashed with ambiguity and no evidence.
If indy photos or low pass LRO images show descent stages and footrprints that no one can prove are tampered with, his life turns to shit.
I can't believe such ignorance is still running around.....
We've been to the moon geez......the moon hoax nonsense has been debunked so many times, only a complete moron would think we've never been there.
The moon rocks are fake, the radio transmissions fooled the whole listening world, the Russians were faked out or part of the deciet, the geologists studying the moon rocks were paid off or sadly mistaken.
The moon relfectors are not there or put there by robots.....
And if it ain't them saying we never went, we got other Einsteins' saying that yes we did go there but were told by the aliens outposting on the moon not to come back!.......lol!
I wonder what the hoaxers are making of the LRO?....... and now we know there is water on the moon as well.......They make a good case for the 'dumbing down' of America conspiracy theory!
Believe it or not, but I know some that told me that NASA pre-programmed all the photos in the LRO. So whatever it transmitted back to earth, these pictures would all be 'NASA-convenient'.......
Can you imagine such ignorance and distrust? LOL
I often said, even when standing next to a descent stage of the LM, these monkeys will shout "FAKE!".
And NASA is so good at photoshop that they can even fool all of the other space engineers in Europe, India, Russia & China!......but them hoaxers tho....they can figure all of this out!
I'd bet if ya kinapped one of 'em and sent them to the moon and back, they'd claim they were drugged by the CIA and put in a fight simulator so it would seen real.
Well HTbU, I guess not. I guess there will always be something like a shouting minority. No matter what event or happening, there will always be a small group of hoaxers. My little nephew (I think he is 13 by now) for instance is collecting data to prove that Michael Jackson is still alive......... LOL But he will grow up, I'm sure. Unlike most of the YouTube hoaxers.
Tom, it's not just a matter of belief. We landed on the moon, no doubt. The evidence is in the public domain for more than 40 year.
And I do not 'attack' people because they are skeptic. I do not like people that are insulting dedicated engineers, scientists and courageous astronauts by telling nonsense. Or worse.
Perhaps if the skeptics discussed and asked questions instead of dictating what they see as a proven conspiracy with everything from controlled media and mass blackmail to premeditated murder, without a crumb of evidence.
You can't stand Apollo in a bed of bullshit, I'm afraid.
Tom, my grandfather was very skeptic when he watched my little demo of my first cellphone. He shouted "Fake!" and said it was just a tape-recorder. But I explained all about GSM and EM-energy and finally he tried the phone and called his son (my father).
There is a huge difference between being skeptic and shouting that NASA killed their own astronauts.
Nixon aide G. Gordon Liddy once said, the problem with government conspiracies is that bureaucrats are incompetent and people cant keep their mouths shut. Complex conspiracies are difficult to pull off, and so many people want their quarter hour of fame that even the Men in Black couldnt squelch the squealers from spilling the beans. So theres a good chance that the more elaborate a conspiracy theory is, and the more people that would need to be involved, the less likely it is true.
When I started my new account up, Gray again tried to get me pulled with false charges of copyright infringement. The fact remains, NASA footage is public domain and I have proof that the Apollo 10 telecasts were prefilmed and edited and that Mark Gray was suppressing existing video material to the public.
Claiming copright infringement is a felony, and Mark Gray has used this felony to try and keep me quiet.
Silence is not consent. Try pulling that one out in a court of law and you'll be in the slammer so fast your head will spin.
There is either a conspiracy run by a bunch of ruthless sociopaths. Why would certainly have the power and the means to take down Jarrah's channel. Or there isn't. Make up your mind which is it to be.
Either that or Jarrah White is the Grand father of all NASA shills.
Given the ruthless organisation you believe to be dealing with, I've got to admire the total disregard you have for your own safety.
The fact that you continue to draw breath lends the lie to everything you have posted regarding these alleged hoaxes.
An organisation that, by your reckoning, has murdered no fewer than 14 astronauts, would not hesitate to remove every trace of your being from existence. If there was a single shred of truth in anything you have published.
WOW... heres an idiot... yeah... their going to go after all the lower nobodies like the people on youtube... i mean... that would lend credibility to the actual conspiracy... by NOT harming the people at our level they make the hoax believers look like liars... i mean... anyone could realise that...haha.. like right after "loose change" was released what would have happened if the people responsible for making it ended up dead... duh... basically it can be summed up by saying silence is consent
Jarrah, on one hand you point to one statement made by John Young about Grissom's concerns as indisputable factual evidence of his murder.. Then, elsewhere, you wave away the hundreds of statements he's made about walking on the Moon.
Either Young is a liar, or he isn't. You can't pick and choose his statements, and the truth of each, to fit your story.
Neither Groves nor Wood hold professional qualifications in the field of radiation and physiological effects of humans. Bzzzt! Fail, Jarrah.
Now, I can't post enough in a single comment and I get hit by posting limits. I'll create a blog, post the URL here, and you can see my responses. I should be able to get it created within 24 hours.
Stop lying, Jarrah. "qualifications IN THE FIELD OF RADIATION AND THE EFFECTS ON HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY". Is a mathematics PhD qualified to do brain surgery? Is a anthropologist qualified to design an aircraft?
I'll start posting my replies on the blog I have created:
as204 (dot) blogspot (dot)com
And I am not interested in the Chinese spacewalk. We are dealing with the Apollo 1 fire. Don't change the subject.
No, you stop lying. As far as I can tell Windley doesn't have a qualifications in the field of radiation nor claimed to, and the credentials he claims to have are in doubt. Yet you still take his word for it. Why is that?
The fact remains both Groves and Wood have academic credentials and both believe the radiation would have a negative effect on the crew and also camera film.
I'm not. I'm just poking out that one of NASA's own guys believes at least part of the space exploration has been faked by the Chinese. I'm sure if he believed Apollo was faked too you'd be attacking his credentials.
When you exceed limits you can just go to the video page, scroll down, insert the code, and continue posting more messages.
Hope your answers are better than the last one you gave. My reply: "How is this an answer? This is exactly the same thing he said in the quotations I've posted. Just worded differently.
If they didn't think the risk was great and didn't know they had an ignition source, why did they threaten to fire anyone who spoke up about the wiring problem, as John Young stated."
"Now, what generally do you consider as a fire hazard in this kind of atmosphere? Then let me say in trying to illustrate, if you were going into a filling station to have car serviced you wouldnt light a match and have a cigarette while the gas was going into the tank. What areas do you identify as rather severe risks in this business of working in a pure oxygen atmosphere?" (more to follow)
Mr. Gurney: "Colonel, we all recognize, I think I state this correctly, that the use of pure oxygen does present, severe fire hazards. I think actually that is the language used in the report and I guess there has been a great deal of discussion between using pure oxygen or some other combination in the cabins of spacecraft and yet it puzzles me when you say that under these specific test conditions you never considered fire as a hazard." (more to follow)
'This was answered in the Congressional hearings during the evening session of 10 APR 1967. See Page 87 of Volume I'
Where is it answered? Page 87 just contains Borman babbling on claiming he and NASA didn't consider that they had fuel, oxygen and an ignition source.
Hell, they obviously had oxygen and fuel: oxygen itself is a rocket propellant. And Buzz Aldrin and John Young respectively admitted they both knew the 15 miles of wire could act as an ignition source.
"Quite frankly we did not think, and this is a failing on my part, and on everyone associated with us; we did not recognize the fact that we had the three essentials, an ignition source, extensive fuel, and of course we knew we had the oxygen"
They knew the dangers, but didn't think they were great, i.e. low risk. This event led to the creation of hazard / risk analysis - used every day in aviation today, but not then.
"we did not recognize the fact that we had the three essentials, an ignition source, extensive fuel, and of course we knew we had the oxygen"
How is this an answer? This is exactly the same thing he said in the quotations I've posted. Just worded differently.
If they didn't think the risk was great and didn't know they had an ignition source, why did they threaten to fire anyone who spoke up about the wiring problem, as John Young stated.
First, you've lied again. You haven't provided two experts who say Apollo was faked because radiation would have killed them. You have misinterpreted what they say about radiation.
Where are the experts in that field who specifically say the Apollo astronauts could not have survived the trip because of radiation? Specifically saying Apollo could not have happened?
No I did not. I gave you both David Groves and Bill Wood. Both have credentials and believe Apollo was faked for that reason.
If you count James Van Allen that makes three people. He specifically stated in his articles that the radiation was lethal to humans even on a rapid transit.
Now answer my question: are you aware that Dr. Qu Zheng from JPL believes that Chinese spacewalk videos were faked?
This is hysterical. Never saw a TOP SECRET document with so many dirty tricks outlined on a single sheet of paper. Funny how anyone with a typrewriter and a rubber stamp can make up any old bullshit and get people to believe it's real. Did James Bond steal this?
People there have been answering your questions left and right. How about answering the important question put to you - or are they right? You are afraid? Come on - answer:
Which professionals qualified to give expert opinion on the effects of the VAB on space travelers have clearly stated that it was impossible for the Apollo astronauts to travel though the VABs because they would have been killed or seriously damaged by the radiations in the Apollo CM?
No, not a dead man WHO SPECIFICALLY REFUTED WHAT YOU CLAIM, but a live person, qualified in the area and who says that Apollo was faked because the radiation was fatal.
Come on - ante up.
BTW - you claim the person on the IMDB is 'cyberstalking' but you support Bart Sibrel's methods? How hypocritical.
'a dead man WHO SPECIFICALLY REFUTED WHAT YOU CLAIM'
He did not. All he did was claim "oops, I made a mistake" and failed to explain how how made a mistake when today satellites must remain outside the belts and have their instruments switched off during transit.
'a live person, qualified in the area and who says that Apollo was faked.'
I already gave you two on the IMDB. BTW, are you aware that Dr. Qu Zheng from JPL believes that Chinese spacewalk videos were faked?
When did I say I supported Sibrel's methods? For the record, there is nothing wrong with meeting up with someone meeting someone at an autograph signing or whatever. But some of Sibrel's encounters could have been pulled off better.
What I do not support, is people twisting the events of the punch incident for defamatory purposes.
How can Windley allege that Sibrel 'lured' Aldrin to the motel, when in his new book Aldrin says the exact same thing as Sibrel? That he bumped into Sibrel after giving an interview to a Japanese company.
"Because of the publicity of the hoax theorists have garnered, occasionally even in a serious interview a reporter will broach the subject. One September morning in 2002, I was in Beverly Hills at the Luxe Hotel, filming an interview for a Far Eastern TV network, when the interview began going in a direction that I knew was out of bounds.
At first I tried to cordial, adroitly answering the question, assuming that the interviewer would recognize my reluctance to talk about inanity, and bring the focus back to a bona fide space subject. Instead the interviewer began playing a television segment that had aired in the United States on the subject of hoaxes, including a section suggesting that the Apollo 11 moon landing never happened. I was aware of the piece and had been livid when it originally aired.
continued. I did not appreciate the interviewers attempts to lure me into commenting on it. Lisa had accompanied me to the interview following her early morning triathlon training in the Santa Monica Bay, and she immediately recognized that this was a flagrant violation of our willingness to conduct the interview in good faith, so she called a halt to the production. We werent belligerent, but we did not linger long over our good-byes, either.
We left the hotel room and walked down the hall to catch the elevator, only a matter of seconds away. I pressed the button for the ground level, and Lisa and I looked at each other and smiled. It had been a strange morning already. When the elevator doors opened on the ground level, it got worse.
As we stepped out into the foyer, a large man who looked to be in his mid-thirties approached me, attempting to engage me in conversation.
Hey, Buzz, how are you? He had his own film crew along, with the camera already rolling to document the encounter.
I greeted him briefly, acknowledging his presence and kept moving standard procedure for life in Hollywood. As Lisa and I walked through the foyer toward the front door of the hotel, however, the man kept getting in my way, peppering me with questions, none of which I answered.
We never went on the earth.
RAREpicture 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I came here just to say Rest in Peace Apollo 1.
These guys were truly some of America's most tragic losses.
Gus Grissom
Ed White
Roger Chaffee
You will always be heroes.
unparallelshadows 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Comment removed
unparallelshadows 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Why did they use volunteers to man the Space Shuttle Challenger? Because the NASA Nazi's knew it was going to blow up
JZJYRWO 1 month ago
We never went to the moon..
L0OOOooooOOOOOOOOL 1 month ago
Lol Jarrah is still at it. i thought you gave up this fight 5 years ago.
999is666upsidedown 2 months ago
Doh!! Jarrah, you really need to stop. You've gone truly nuts.
lukequixotesanjose 2 months ago
Comment removed
ApolloWasReal 2 months ago
@lukequixotesanjose Agreed. I wonder if he would have said anything about the hazards of a pure O2 atmosphere *before* January 1967. Hindsight is so 20-20.
ApolloWasReal 2 months ago
@ApolloWasReal
Exactly. Hindsight is wonderful.
lukequixotesanjose 2 months ago
Your dumb mutherfucker.....the Russians tracked every fucking Apollo mission each Apollo mission left a reflective disc which can be detected from earth when a laser is beamed on if Apollo was a fake don't you think the Russians woulda came out and disputed it......end your life now your a fucking retard and have made everybody reading this post dumber you fucking moron.......until ignorant bastards like u can build a rocket go to the moon and prove it fake......keep your fucking mouth shut
jakebrake4343 2 months ago
If you people feel like the united states is really this bad....stop enjoying our freedom and get the fuck out!!!!!!
jakebrake4343 2 months ago
@jakebrake4343 YOUR FREEDOM, LOL. IF YOU KNOW HOW MUCH YOU ARE OPPRESSED YOU WOULD WEEP. AMERICANS ARE SOME OF THE MOST ENSLAVED PEOPLE ON THE PLANET. THERE ARE NO PEOPLE MORE HOPELESSLY ENSLAVED THAN THOSE WHO FALSELY THINK THEY ARE FREE.
YOU ARE A SAD JOKE.
glower125 2 months ago
@jakebrake4343 FREEDOM MY ASS...THE POWERS THAT BE OWN YOU..AND GUESS WHAT YOU ARE NOT A MEMBER OF THEIR CLUB
milkywaycenter 2 months ago
Not only did they track us but the Apollo missions left things behind reflective lenses on the moon which scientists still use today
jakebrake4343 2 months ago
@jakebrake4343 IDIOT, THEY LEFT WHAT? RELYING ON HIGH SCHOOL SOCIAL SCIENCE YOU RETARD?
glower125 2 months ago
I'm not even going to dignify the theory by watching this garbage. Get professional help or better yet, take the high road and just kill yourself, it'll be a better world if you do.
mcmlxvi 3 months ago
HOLY SHIT you are delusional. does the word "reality" even exist in your mind
SubMeSub 3 months ago
If anyone here knows the history of the Apollo project
it was to beat the Russians to the Moon.
If the Moon Landings are a hoax, why did the Russians not
speak out? They were tracking all of Apollo missions
douglaswbrendel 3 months ago
The only reason I dont believe it was a murder , is the high cost of the program . They could murder them in a cheapest way
vagos290189 4 months ago
APOLLO 1 MURDER
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
Jarrah White - how can one person be so insanely stupid about so many things in just one lifetime?
executivesteps 6 months ago
@executivesteps you need to be on stronger medication
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
victim of the farce of going to the moon.
Sonofabitch ! U.S. government.
trespernas19 6 months ago
And also you know when you accuse people of murder and conspiracy with no evidence or reason they tend not to respond.
kate4651 6 months ago
Operation 'dirty trick' was a proposal. I don't know how you got from it that NASA was prepared to kill one of their own, because the proposal was completely disregarded. NASA would no way kill an astronaut on purpose, they would do anything but. Take a look at Apollo 13...
kate4651 6 months ago
@kate4651
Then how about CIA you fucking faggot? Would they kill someone like Grissom who not only didn't believe the landing was possibility but he was also saying jokes about it?Would CIA kill someone like Baron and his family because he testified evidence the Apollo1 "accident" could NOT have been an accident?Fucking criminal twat.
MickeyMouseApollo 5 months ago
spottydog4477@ How sure are you that any info given in this video is not true? Operation Northwoods is a fact!! But lets say we have an ever lasting soul. Would you bet that ever lasting soul on the falsehood of the allegations? Your childs or love ones life maybe? Yes or No? Take the chance an answer. Answer if you are sure. If you do not answer then that is an answer.
vanillaexplosion99 8 months ago
Ok so I guess we should believe everything we're told?? Duh! YES they were fake. Wake up! Look at the evidence! !!!!! infowars.com
funtosparkle 9 months ago
anyone who believes moon landings were fake = retard.
plotchickens 10 months ago
Dude Jarrah, you made a really dumb statement. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, and 9/11 was done by terrorists.
yesiamawizardjonny 10 months ago
Fake bums............is there no end to the ignorance sloshing around youtube?
These clowns have little education -especially in the realm of science......
I like the old school days of keeping the villiage idiots locked up on a box
spottydog4477 10 months ago
@spottydog4477 Unfortunately in this PC age, such practical measures are now frowned upon, and those that would once have been Safely locked away for their own good are now allowed to wander the internet, polluting it with their dribbling rants.
MrBillyBalfour 7 months ago
I simply cannot stop watching this videos
darkmasterpel 11 months ago
oh ya because the us would go and kill cubans because fidel blew up a rocket because they were taugnting him
FuzorPrime 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a lunar conspiracy theory of my own. Mine is that the US government blew 20 billion dollars over 10+ years and pushed the aerospace, computing, electronics, metallurgy and bio-medicine industries of that country so far forward that they have maintained a lead which they largely hold to this day, and in the process achieved the single greatest feat of mankind and international kudos whilst making their opponents look like amateurs.
Theres your conspiracy, simple isnt it. Dickheads.
DumbYankies 11 months ago
jerk
geeman693 1 year ago
What a load of crap. Like a dump truck full. This kid needs to grow up.
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
every conspiracy theory about the lunar landing has been debunked ..... hard.
fucking grow up.
plotchickens 1 year ago
This is such a childish argument... like nearly all conspiracy theories. You hinge your entire argument around a presupposition that you take as fact, or simply ignore the odds while barreling onward with your false logic. This time, I think your understanding of the US Government is at fault; you don't seem to understand Bureaucracy very well. A document produced by some individual in the CIA does not constitute intent by the US Government... simply of that individual or committee.
aaron8862006 1 year ago
[...] and in classic conspiracy theorist form, you ignore the details that sink your argument. I understand that in the post-9/11, it's all the rage to suggest the US Government will kill any number of its citizens to get a chosen war. It's so lacking in sound proof that it amazes me you take this much time to make a video. Your best proof for this "Cuban invasion" is a document that constitutes a small group's suggestions. IF those suggestions were taken, the document would still be classified.
aaron8862006 1 year ago
[...] It's something like suggesting that the US Government was really going to nuke the Korea/China border simply because Douglas McArthur said he'd like to. A juvenile suggestion based on speculation.
I don't want to insult your opinion, just note your lack of logic.
aaron8862006 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this tragedy is revolting, stupid, absurd! these men died so tragically because of the stupidity and imcopetencia A few more of NASA technicians in época.Eles should never be forgotten, are heroes, martyrs! If they had died tragically in space even though it would be more acceptable, but in a test platform, is unacceptable! And the families? someone thought of the suffering now? I wonder how they are today and say the world will never forget the courage of these men! stay with god!
TheFOXRAPTOR22 1 year ago
Now why would they build the massive Saturn 5...If only to launch? and not go to the moon? They went there alrighty! and it insults the memory and sacrifice of not just Apollo 1 crew but all lost in service of Nasa!
RFKFANTS67 1 year ago
@RFKFANTS67
You are damn right.
receiver69 1 year ago
@RFKFANTS67 correct!
cathytreks 1 year ago
We went to the moon and landed there because of the people who had the guts to do it.
The heroes of Apollo 1 had the guts to get the Apollo program started and died for it.
We owe them.
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 1 year ago
@GeorgeVreelandHill
You are very damn right.
receiver69 1 year ago
@GeorgeVreelandHill all so true!!!
cathytreks 1 year ago
@GeorgeVreelandHill Well said sir.
airdaleva42 1 year ago
The US government will go to any lengths!
talon115 1 year ago
this tragedy is revolting, stupid, absurd! these men died so tragically because of the stupidity and imcopetencia A few more of NASA technicians in época.Eles should never be forgotten, are heroes, martyrs! If they had died tragically in space even though it would be more acceptable, but in a test platform, is unacceptable! And the families? someone thought of the suffering now? I wonder how they are today and say the world will never forget the courage of these men! stay with god!
TheFOXRAPTOR22 1 year ago
Asinine
Haplotype0 1 year ago
Bastards, this video ought to be pulled off you tube due to the great insult to all of the brave astronauts since the days of Mercury , Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, and The Shuttle.
You lying pieces of dog shit.
ColonelPhillipGreen 1 year ago
There is no moon.
brainleftme 1 year ago
Much better with the sound off.
caddo21 1 year ago
Love this stuff;great entertainment.
2bz2bme 1 year ago
9/11 was an inside job, a lie. But, i can assure you, we did infact land on the moon.
elitesack 1 year ago
@elitesack How can you be so sure?
IMMUNEHUMAN 1 year ago
@IMMUNEHUMAN
itwas seen on u tube so must b tru
StraydogO2 1 year ago
we did go to the moon. there are specifically placed reflectors, hand placed there, that we can use from earth.
elitesack 1 year ago
@elitesack
noway watch mythbusters careful
those refractors are faked
StraydogO2 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 they did do a thing on it, but, thats not all thats out there about these refractors :D you can see them in certain telescopes, visually :D
elitesack 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 no, they are not fake, but you are an ignorant lying dog.
ColonelPhillipGreen 1 year ago
@elitesack correct.
ColonelPhillipGreen 1 year ago
I love this jarrah whites passion for this stuff. You are a great role model good sir.
yourboycal 1 year ago
7:21 Chaffee looks like he's saying "LOL tinhats"
RockabillyAutopsy 1 year ago
6:26 Phil Plait is a total asshole- a little bitch-they're wrong-they're wrong-just like a little bitch. Tell me how the ASCENT POD'S lauched off the moon with barely any fuel-no GPS-a little docking window were able to rendez-vous with the CM doing 4000 MPH??????? LOL BULLSHIT LIES U NASA NAZI'S.
ed11561 1 year ago
if someone fails to answer your questions to them about operation dirty trick or what ever it may be, this does not in any way make you right.
colmas 1 year ago
Duh. Everybody knows Kira did it, with a Death Note.
shandamoon 1 year ago
someone should kick your ass for this shameless false accuse of nasa murdering these men
StraydogO2 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 someone should kick your ass for this shameless false accuse of nasa murdering these men -LOL U DUMB FUCK- NASA WAS COMPOSED OF NAZI WAR CRIMINALS WHO USED JEWS AS SLAVES TO BUILD V2 ROCKETS. THEY SHOULD HAVE ALL BEEN TRIED AT NUREMBERG ASSHOLE. And u have the balls to make it sound as if they were HONORALE MEN. HA-HA FUCKING JOKE-They were Nazi war criminals brought over by the PENTAGON'S PROJECT PAPERCLIP. dumb ass fuck.Look it up Project Paperclip.U know all about it i'm sure.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed1156546339035132
u r insane
u r a paperclip
read frontiers alot have ya?
StraydogO2 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 Project Paperclip-a plan conceived by the War-Monger Penta-con to import Nazi Murderer Scientists & administrative Nazi's to free reign in the good ole USA with deleted War Criminal records-jobs with NASA & GE & a dozen other war based corporations. Nazi war criminals were not allowed entry into the US per The President of the US.He was ignored & thousands of nazi war criminals were given jobs,had their histories purged & made a fortune in the USA. What is wrong asshole?ALL FACT DICK
cadu1995 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 Look it up you moronic asshole.Bet u haven't read a book in our sorry fucking life.
SECRET AGENDA by Linda Hunt
Read about all your Nazi War Criminals in NASA asshole.Some of them were even implicated in sabatoging some of the rockets at first.VonBraun loved to beat his little personal slaves.And THOUSANDS of German prisoners were killed,beaten,starved to death & worked to death in the V2 Rocket factories of the Nasa Nazi's BUT make sure they have a job wih nasa when the war ends
cadu1995 1 year ago
@born-in-1995
stfu moronic nitwit bet u have no life outside utube fucking asshole
StraydogO2 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 Bet me Bitchboy lol. YOU r the asshole schmuck.I've been telling you for months-doesn'tit ge thru to u asswipe? Guess not.Just like the fact that we never went to the moon.
BTW why r u all over films that SHOW we never went, Do u tink your dumb ass is going to convince anyone we did? Or does nasa pay nice propaganda wages?LOL
I guess you never did read a book.Try it sometime.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 Whats the matter asshole? NO COMMENT on your German Nazi Nasa missile specialists? Alot of them were horrendous mass murderers-killing thousands of prisoners to make their V2 rockets. PROJECT PAPERCLIP NAZI'S WELCOMED TO NASA. lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
@moron
no comment coz i am a jew
you braindead idiot
StraydogO2 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 who gives a fuck what u are dummy.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed0
stfu
StraydogO2 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 FUCK OFF ASSHOLE.
ed11561 1 year ago
@ed0.00001 stfu
StraydogO2 1 year ago
@StraydogO2 ditto asshole
cadu1995 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StraydogO2 someone should kick your ass for this shameless false accuse of nasa murdering these men -LOL U DUMB FUCK- NASA WAS COMPOSED OF NAZI WAR CRIMINALS WHO USED JEWS AS SLAVES TO BUILD V2 ROCKETS. THEY SHOULD HAVE ALL BEEN TRIED AT NUREMBERG ASSHOLE. And u have the balls to make it sound as if they were HONORALE MEN. HA-HA FUCKING JOKE-They were Nazi war criminals brought over by the PENTAGON'S PROJECT PAPERCLIP. dumb ass fuck.Look it up Project Paperclip.U know all about it i'm sure.
ed11561 1 year ago
@cadu1995
didn't you know NASA really stands for NAZI AMERICAN SPACE AGENCY.
beastwars 1 year ago
@beastwars I know. And Never A Straight Answer
cadu1995 1 year ago
That pic of them praying at the model command module is so eery even though they were just joking
mashamorgan 1 year ago
Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
- Woodrow Wilson
NASANAZIRACE 2 years ago
Go read Andrew Chaikin's excellent book "A Man on the Moon" - thoroughly researched, extensive interviews and study done -- which later became the basis of the HBO mini-series "From the Earth to the Moon"; which is also highly recommended.
marcbrillant 2 years ago
phil plate or whatever his name is, is a moron
halburd1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
humanmonkeyworld 2 years ago
@humanmonkeyworld dude. go outside and collect some fresh air. theres more to live for than devoting your life to saying everything was a hoax
SpartanW98 2 years ago
william casey
former c i a director:
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the american public believes is false."
nuff read???
NAZA LIES
wsee 2 years ago
Wsee, please don't make it so damn clear all the time that you are a conspiracist pur sang.
Rob260259 2 years ago
@wsee The disinformation program is a colossal success, then. The only ones immune to it all (eventually) are us "conspiracy nuts". lol That's because the truth has a way of leaking out. In the end, the only ones left, will be the evil ones because evil does seem to be winning with the help of their hoards of sychophant believers.
olga2415 1 year ago
How many CTs have taken this "evidence" to the police, who are compelled to investigate murder - whatever it's dressed up as.
JW is an obsessed psychotic - but here's a thing. Forget the anonymous 'special needs' types on these threads, JW has put his name on every aspect of NASA research that can be trashed with ambiguity and no evidence.
If indy photos or low pass LRO images show descent stages and footrprints that no one can prove are tampered with, his life turns to shit.
Rapidly.
timpovikings 2 years ago
Positivism is delusional mindset of thought conformity.
Tom101229 2 years ago
I can't believe such ignorance is still running around.....
We've been to the moon geez......the moon hoax nonsense has been debunked so many times, only a complete moron would think we've never been there.
The moon rocks are fake, the radio transmissions fooled the whole listening world, the Russians were faked out or part of the deciet, the geologists studying the moon rocks were paid off or sadly mistaken.
The moon relfectors are not there or put there by robots.....
Geez.......
HisTruthbeUNKOWN 2 years ago
I am sorry HTU, but you are absolutely right.
But there is nothing you can do to make a bunch of conspiracy theorists use a little bit of common sense.
And there is nothing you can do to tell them that they are NOT smarter than 40 years worth of scientists, engineers and astronomers.
Rob260259 2 years ago
And if it ain't them saying we never went, we got other Einsteins' saying that yes we did go there but were told by the aliens outposting on the moon not to come back!.......lol!
I wonder what the hoaxers are making of the LRO?....... and now we know there is water on the moon as well.......They make a good case for the 'dumbing down' of America conspiracy theory!
HisTruthbeUNKOWN 2 years ago
Believe it or not, but I know some that told me that NASA pre-programmed all the photos in the LRO. So whatever it transmitted back to earth, these pictures would all be 'NASA-convenient'.......
Can you imagine such ignorance and distrust? LOL
I often said, even when standing next to a descent stage of the LM, these monkeys will shout "FAKE!".
Rob260259 2 years ago
And NASA is so good at photoshop that they can even fool all of the other space engineers in Europe, India, Russia & China!......but them hoaxers tho....they can figure all of this out!
I'd bet if ya kinapped one of 'em and sent them to the moon and back, they'd claim they were drugged by the CIA and put in a fight simulator so it would seen real.
It never ends, does it?
HisTruthbeUNKOWN 2 years ago
Well HTbU, I guess not. I guess there will always be something like a shouting minority. No matter what event or happening, there will always be a small group of hoaxers. My little nephew (I think he is 13 by now) for instance is collecting data to prove that Michael Jackson is still alive......... LOL But he will grow up, I'm sure. Unlike most of the YouTube hoaxers.
Rob260259 2 years ago
You are a thought conformist.
Tom101229 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Shut up, thought conformist.
Tom101229 2 years ago
Wow don't you know Moon Hoaxers are just skeptics of the Lunar Missions. What is wrong with being skeptical?
Tom101229 2 years ago
There is nothing wrong with being skeptical Tom.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Then why are you against people being skeptical about what you believe to be true? Rather why do you attack their skepticism?
Tom101229 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tom, it's not just a matter of belief. We landed on the moon, no doubt. The evidence is in the public domain for more than 40 year.
And I do not 'attack' people because they are skeptic. I do not like people that are insulting dedicated engineers, scientists and courageous astronauts by telling nonsense. Or worse.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Tom
Perhaps if the skeptics discussed and asked questions instead of dictating what they see as a proven conspiracy with everything from controlled media and mass blackmail to premeditated murder, without a crumb of evidence.
You can't stand Apollo in a bed of bullshit, I'm afraid.
timpovikings 2 years ago
Is that what you do? Do you ask questions about what you are skeptical about prior to insulting someone or stating what you conceive to be facts?
Seriously, are you going to start saying,"Do as I say, not how I act?" Typical hypocrit.
"You can't stand Apollo in a bed of bullshit, I'm afraid."
WTF?! Goodness what the hell was that? Are you even trying to make any sense?
Tom101229 2 years ago
Tom
I thought skepticsim is born of not knowing something for sure or of rejecting something they feel requires more tangible proof?
The 'hoax' Apollo missions have no evidence. None whatsoever.
I'm sorry my opinion irritates you. I had assumed an academic would exercise more tolerance.
timpovikings 2 years ago
Tom, my grandfather was very skeptic when he watched my little demo of my first cellphone. He shouted "Fake!" and said it was just a tape-recorder. But I explained all about GSM and EM-energy and finally he tried the phone and called his son (my father).
There is a huge difference between being skeptic and shouting that NASA killed their own astronauts.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Rob
Check the profile.
Bullshitter!
timpovikings 2 years ago
Timpo, that is a very optimistic estimate...
Rob260259 2 years ago
Rob
And posting vicarious and overtly racist opinion of Islam through the quotes of The Radical Ryushin, is neither delusional nor conformist, I suppose?
An anti-Islamist, computer programming entrepreneurial professor, teaching in the lofty halls of academia?
Yeah, okay.
Hobbies: Astronaut - with the occasional dabbling in open heart surgery.
timpovikings 2 years ago
The radiation of the van allen belt and space is lethal. Much thanks Jarrah for proving to me that we never went to the moon.
9gnosis9 2 years ago
Are thease heroes stlill alife?
SendeRukr 2 years ago
Once again, we see Jarrah is wrong:
apollohoax . proboards . com / index.cgi?board=theories&action=display&thread=2564
So - you going to apologise, Jarrah?
m8081679 2 years ago
Don't hold your breath dude.
BigglesBear 2 years ago
Great post. I figure that Jarrah is thinking of another video about it.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Nixon aide G. Gordon Liddy once said, the problem with government conspiracies is that bureaucrats are incompetent and people cant keep their mouths shut. Complex conspiracies are difficult to pull off, and so many people want their quarter hour of fame that even the Men in Black couldnt squelch the squealers from spilling the beans. So theres a good chance that the more elaborate a conspiracy theory is, and the more people that would need to be involved, the less likely it is true.
BigglesBear 2 years ago
The only conspiracy, is one of stupidity being perpetrated by Jarrah White and his cabal of sycophants.
MrBillyBalfour 2 years ago
Which proves exactly what?
Your still online peddling your extreme line of BS.
BigglesBear 2 years ago
When I started my new account up, Gray again tried to get me pulled with false charges of copyright infringement. The fact remains, NASA footage is public domain and I have proof that the Apollo 10 telecasts were prefilmed and edited and that Mark Gray was suppressing existing video material to the public.
Claiming copright infringement is a felony, and Mark Gray has used this felony to try and keep me quiet.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Silence is not consent. Try pulling that one out in a court of law and you'll be in the slammer so fast your head will spin.
There is either a conspiracy run by a bunch of ruthless sociopaths. Why would certainly have the power and the means to take down Jarrah's channel. Or there isn't. Make up your mind which is it to be.
Either that or Jarrah White is the Grand father of all NASA shills.
BigglesBear 2 years ago
'There is either a conspiracy run by a bunch of ruthless sociopaths. Why would certainly have the power and the means to take down Jarrah's channel.'
watch?v=bZ8CbelERM8
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
An issue with copyright is hardly what would be expected from an evil nazi organisation trying to silence you.
If I were you, I'd be far more worried by this one ....
watch?v=-LLFdhJC08M
apollotls 2 years ago
What exactly is your problem with my C-130 video?
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Given the ruthless organisation you believe to be dealing with, I've got to admire the total disregard you have for your own safety.
The fact that you continue to draw breath lends the lie to everything you have posted regarding these alleged hoaxes.
An organisation that, by your reckoning, has murdered no fewer than 14 astronauts, would not hesitate to remove every trace of your being from existence. If there was a single shred of truth in anything you have published.
BigglesBear 2 years ago
WOW... heres an idiot... yeah... their going to go after all the lower nobodies like the people on youtube... i mean... that would lend credibility to the actual conspiracy... by NOT harming the people at our level they make the hoax believers look like liars... i mean... anyone could realise that...haha.. like right after "loose change" was released what would have happened if the people responsible for making it ended up dead... duh... basically it can be summed up by saying silence is consent
gilligan80 2 years ago
Thus spake the deranged spawn of the unholy union between ignorance and stupidity.
MrBillyBalfour 2 years ago
ROFL
BigglesBear 2 years ago
pathetic shill
muckletoon 2 years ago
Jarrah, on one hand you point to one statement made by John Young about Grissom's concerns as indisputable factual evidence of his murder.. Then, elsewhere, you wave away the hundreds of statements he's made about walking on the Moon.
Either Young is a liar, or he isn't. You can't pick and choose his statements, and the truth of each, to fit your story.
sc0qter 2 years ago
Neither Groves nor Wood hold professional qualifications in the field of radiation and physiological effects of humans. Bzzzt! Fail, Jarrah.
Now, I can't post enough in a single comment and I get hit by posting limits. I'll create a blog, post the URL here, and you can see my responses. I should be able to get it created within 24 hours.
m8081679 2 years ago
"Neither Groves nor Wood hold professional qualifications"
Correction, they both hold a BSc and PhD. Groves in photography and Wood in aerospace engineering.
And James Van Allen explicitly stated that the radiation was lethal to astronauts.
'I can't post enough in a single comment and I get hit by posting limits'
Try punching in the code to write more or just wait a few minutes.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Stop lying, Jarrah. "qualifications IN THE FIELD OF RADIATION AND THE EFFECTS ON HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY". Is a mathematics PhD qualified to do brain surgery? Is a anthropologist qualified to design an aircraft?
I'll start posting my replies on the blog I have created:
as204 (dot) blogspot (dot)com
And I am not interested in the Chinese spacewalk. We are dealing with the Apollo 1 fire. Don't change the subject.
m8081679 2 years ago
'Stop lying, Jarrah.'
No, you stop lying. As far as I can tell Windley doesn't have a qualifications in the field of radiation nor claimed to, and the credentials he claims to have are in doubt. Yet you still take his word for it. Why is that?
The fact remains both Groves and Wood have academic credentials and both believe the radiation would have a negative effect on the crew and also camera film.
'as204 (dot) blogspot (dot)com'
Expect a reply shortly.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Comment removed
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
"Don't change the subject."
I'm not. I'm just poking out that one of NASA's own guys believes at least part of the space exploration has been faked by the Chinese. I'm sure if he believed Apollo was faked too you'd be attacking his credentials.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When you exceed limits you can just go to the video page, scroll down, insert the code, and continue posting more messages.
Hope your answers are better than the last one you gave. My reply: "How is this an answer? This is exactly the same thing he said in the quotations I've posted. Just worded differently.
If they didn't think the risk was great and didn't know they had an ignition source, why did they threaten to fire anyone who spoke up about the wiring problem, as John Young stated."
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
And quit dodging my question: are you aware that Dr. Qu Zheng from JPL believes that Chinese spacewalk videos were faked?
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
"Now, what generally do you consider as a fire hazard in this kind of atmosphere? Then let me say in trying to illustrate, if you were going into a filling station to have car serviced you wouldnt light a match and have a cigarette while the gas was going into the tank. What areas do you identify as rather severe risks in this business of working in a pure oxygen atmosphere?" (more to follow)
m8081679 2 years ago
Mr. Gurney: "Colonel, we all recognize, I think I state this correctly, that the use of pure oxygen does present, severe fire hazards. I think actually that is the language used in the report and I guess there has been a great deal of discussion between using pure oxygen or some other combination in the cabins of spacecraft and yet it puzzles me when you say that under these specific test conditions you never considered fire as a hazard." (more to follow)
m8081679 2 years ago
Q1. This was answered in the Congressional hearings during the evening session of 10 APR 1967. See Page 87 of Volume I:
m8081679 2 years ago
'This was answered in the Congressional hearings during the evening session of 10 APR 1967. See Page 87 of Volume I'
Where is it answered? Page 87 just contains Borman babbling on claiming he and NASA didn't consider that they had fuel, oxygen and an ignition source.
Hell, they obviously had oxygen and fuel: oxygen itself is a rocket propellant. And Buzz Aldrin and John Young respectively admitted they both knew the 15 miles of wire could act as an ignition source.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
And that's your answer:
"Quite frankly we did not think, and this is a failing on my part, and on everyone associated with us; we did not recognize the fact that we had the three essentials, an ignition source, extensive fuel, and of course we knew we had the oxygen"
They knew the dangers, but didn't think they were great, i.e. low risk. This event led to the creation of hazard / risk analysis - used every day in aviation today, but not then.
m8081679 2 years ago
"we did not recognize the fact that we had the three essentials, an ignition source, extensive fuel, and of course we knew we had the oxygen"
How is this an answer? This is exactly the same thing he said in the quotations I've posted. Just worded differently.
If they didn't think the risk was great and didn't know they had an ignition source, why did they threaten to fire anyone who spoke up about the wiring problem, as John Young stated.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
"why did they threaten to fire anyone who spoke up about the wiring problem, as John Young stated"
There's no evidence that NASA threatened anyone.
At that time, the astronauts also thought they would be fired if they got divorced. Turned out they were wrong.
apollotls 2 years ago
"There's no evidence that NASA threatened anyone."
John Young claimed just that in his various interviews, such as the one he gave Th!nkFilms for In The Shadow Of The Moon.
"At that time, the astronauts also thought they would be fired if they got divorced."
Source please. Jack Swigert became an astronaut in 1966. He wasn't even married.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
"John Young claimed just that "
No. He said Grissom told him that. It was Grissom's fear. No evidence that he was threatened by NASA.
"Source please"
For example, Dave Scott's book.
Swigert. Not married, true. But he wasn't divorced either, was he?
apollotls 2 years ago
First, you've lied again. You haven't provided two experts who say Apollo was faked because radiation would have killed them. You have misinterpreted what they say about radiation.
Where are the experts in that field who specifically say the Apollo astronauts could not have survived the trip because of radiation? Specifically saying Apollo could not have happened?
m8081679 2 years ago
"First, you've lied again."
No I did not. I gave you both David Groves and Bill Wood. Both have credentials and believe Apollo was faked for that reason.
If you count James Van Allen that makes three people. He specifically stated in his articles that the radiation was lethal to humans even on a rapid transit.
Now answer my question: are you aware that Dr. Qu Zheng from JPL believes that Chinese spacewalk videos were faked?
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
This is hysterical. Never saw a TOP SECRET document with so many dirty tricks outlined on a single sheet of paper. Funny how anyone with a typrewriter and a rubber stamp can make up any old bullshit and get people to believe it's real. Did James Bond steal this?
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
look up "Operation Northwoods" on wiki. the document is real. :)
adiohead 2 years ago
People there have been answering your questions left and right. How about answering the important question put to you - or are they right? You are afraid? Come on - answer:
Which professionals qualified to give expert opinion on the effects of the VAB on space travelers have clearly stated that it was impossible for the Apollo astronauts to travel though the VABs because they would have been killed or seriously damaged by the radiations in the Apollo CM?
m8081679 2 years ago
"People there have been answering your questions left and right."
That's not how I remember it. Perhaps you would care to answer the questions I have asked you regarding Apollo 1?
And for those keeping score: I answered m8081679's question on Part 11 of this video.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
No, not a dead man WHO SPECIFICALLY REFUTED WHAT YOU CLAIM, but a live person, qualified in the area and who says that Apollo was faked because the radiation was fatal.
Come on - ante up.
BTW - you claim the person on the IMDB is 'cyberstalking' but you support Bart Sibrel's methods? How hypocritical.
m8081679 2 years ago
'a dead man WHO SPECIFICALLY REFUTED WHAT YOU CLAIM'
He did not. All he did was claim "oops, I made a mistake" and failed to explain how how made a mistake when today satellites must remain outside the belts and have their instruments switched off during transit.
'a live person, qualified in the area and who says that Apollo was faked.'
I already gave you two on the IMDB. BTW, are you aware that Dr. Qu Zheng from JPL believes that Chinese spacewalk videos were faked?
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
When did I say I supported Sibrel's methods? For the record, there is nothing wrong with meeting up with someone meeting someone at an autograph signing or whatever. But some of Sibrel's encounters could have been pulled off better.
What I do not support, is people twisting the events of the punch incident for defamatory purposes.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
How can Windley allege that Sibrel 'lured' Aldrin to the motel, when in his new book Aldrin says the exact same thing as Sibrel? That he bumped into Sibrel after giving an interview to a Japanese company.
Here is that quotation again.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
"Because of the publicity of the hoax theorists have garnered, occasionally even in a serious interview a reporter will broach the subject. One September morning in 2002, I was in Beverly Hills at the Luxe Hotel, filming an interview for a Far Eastern TV network, when the interview began going in a direction that I knew was out of bounds.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
continued.
At first I tried to cordial, adroitly answering the question, assuming that the interviewer would recognize my reluctance to talk about inanity, and bring the focus back to a bona fide space subject. Instead the interviewer began playing a television segment that had aired in the United States on the subject of hoaxes, including a section suggesting that the Apollo 11 moon landing never happened. I was aware of the piece and had been livid when it originally aired.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
continued. I did not appreciate the interviewers attempts to lure me into commenting on it. Lisa had accompanied me to the interview following her early morning triathlon training in the Santa Monica Bay, and she immediately recognized that this was a flagrant violation of our willingness to conduct the interview in good faith, so she called a halt to the production. We werent belligerent, but we did not linger long over our good-byes, either.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
continued
We left the hotel room and walked down the hall to catch the elevator, only a matter of seconds away. I pressed the button for the ground level, and Lisa and I looked at each other and smiled. It had been a strange morning already. When the elevator doors opened on the ground level, it got worse.
As we stepped out into the foyer, a large man who looked to be in his mid-thirties approached me, attempting to engage me in conversation.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
continued
Hey, Buzz, how are you? He had his own film crew along, with the camera already rolling to document the encounter.
I greeted him briefly, acknowledging his presence and kept moving standard procedure for life in Hollywood. As Lisa and I walked through the foyer toward the front door of the hotel, however, the man kept getting in my way, peppering me with questions, none of which I answered.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago