The great flood of Noah's time happened in what was the Black Sea and Caspian Sea area about 10,000 years ago. This flood was caused by the Mediterranean overflowing into this low laying, previously dry, area. The ocean level is rising at a rate of 18cm every 100 years at the moment and this is because more and more water is being produced by methanogens, an early form of life. Water is a product of their metabolism where they reduce carbon dioxide using hydrogen. More at evolutionem.co.uk
Is it possible that if God does exist and did create everything from the beginning like the bible says, that... he could have modified the laws of science to allow this to happen? The laws of science are impossible to ignore and solid but who created the Laws?? I'm Just Searching4DatTruth
What is capable of heating the atmosphere and the oceans up to thousands of degrees, wouldn't be able to heat the much greater volume of the mantle lithosphere to any great extent. Distributed , it would cause several degrees centrigrade of heat increase in the mantle. But more likely, was that fierce but localized heating would take place along the pathways of subduction down in the mantle. Most heat would dissipate into the surrounding lithosphere, but some would be released as volcanism.
Hogwash is useful in cleaning out hoggish objections. Volcanism would find it difficult to dump very much of that energy up to the surface of the earth. Most of it (in runaway thermal subduction) is generated on it's way down to the bottom of the mantle as friction. How is all but a small amount of that friction heat going to magically rise up through many hundreds of miles of the mantles lithosphere to cook the surface? The proportion released would be relatively small.
I'm not referring to Walt Brown's hydroplate hypothesis. I'm talking about Baumgardner's CPT (catastrophic plate tectonics - the mechanism being runaway thermal subduction).
Given that the arguments put up against it don't see to be holding up too well, I'd say our discussions are on a very relevant topic. The deluge explains various landforms and features that are rather hard to explain otherwise.
But most importantly, it would make a great movie - and it scares the heck out of one just thinking about what it would have been like! Mmm, Mmm!
Crack cocoaine! It's real hard. Drugs must be hard and cause violence, or they're not the real deal. My drug leads me to violence. Early one morning while making the rounds, I took a shot of cocoaine and I shot my woman down. I went right home and I went to bed, I put that lovin' 44 beneath my head. Got up next morning and I grabbed that gun. I took a shot of cocoaine and away I run. Made a good run, but I run too slow. They overtook me down in Juarez Mexico...
(5) There have been criticisms that the 10^28 Joules of potential energy released in the process would boil the oceans many times over - ie. cook the surface of the planet to many thousands of degrees - an implausible scenario by any standards!!
However, the vast majority of this conversion of gravitational potential energy to heat energy would have taken place as the subducted material sank hundres of miles down to the bottom of the mantle. How would this heat reach back up to the surface?
(4) What Baumgardners theory proposes is that the subduction of the relatively dense ocean floors enabled the hotter and less dense (because of temperature and composition) material to vertically uplift because of bouyancu effects. Thus the ocean floors were pushed up (along with all the water in them) with the result that the oceans overtopped the continents for a while until the process completed and the formation of higher density ocean floors once again lowered them, taking the water back.
(3) In runaway thermal subduction the process is so rapid that the subducting crust doesn't 'wait around" for more crust to form first. It just gets pulled down by it's own higher density at a calculated speed of up to tens of meters per second. In my opinion, the ocean would for the most part, be heated, but not boiled by the hot layer left behind on the bottom. In addition this layer would be cooled by the ocean, forming an insulating skin on the new ocean floor hindering further heating...
(2) With Baumgardners runaway termal subduction idea, you mentioned that the thermal diffusivity of the water is artificially (and ridiculously) too high. But there's a reason for that. He has to do that in order to get the simulation to behave realistically at the large grid size. If a much smaller scale grid size were used (ie. if computers were much more powerful than they are at the moment) then he wouldn't have to do that. It's just an artefact of the limitations of the grid size.
The specific heat of water is conveniently a rather large value. Good for life, and good for flood mechanics. It's capable of cooling quite a lot of heat!
@tubewatch59 It heats slowly, but it retains heat, and all that geothermal heat plus limestone formation plus all the meteor impacts in the earth's geology hydroplate theory would require if you include the sedimentary layers as "flood layers" would boil all the water on earth. High specific heat means it does not dissipate heat quickly. The earth would roast.
(1) Though I don't neccessarily agree with the hydroplate theory myself, remember that the water being discussed in Brown's idea is 10 miles down, so the large pressure increase at that depth would rather easily prevent water from boiling at much higher temperatures. Brown's theory also suggests the water was in the supercritical state. We see that happening in deep submarine volcanoes which cannot boil the water due to the high pressures down there.
@tubewatch59 There is no evidence of hydroplates. The earth's crust is too brittle, the whole situation would be too unstable to last long enough for the Bible chronology.
So he puts ethics, scientific clues and others theories in something that requires fate,knowledge, and heart, doubt or not if he speaks without faith (which he is) he speaks of man theories, n only what he's read from books and articles something completely different of what's God, The bible, FAITH, and heart
No Ice ages in Bible but people bear witness that the Angel Gabriel gave direct enlightenment about Noah, floods & everything else similar to the Bible (God's word) in the Quran?
Even the book of Genesis states that the Earth fattened. But before that, it was covered by liquid water and surrounded by a heavy atmosphere mostly composed of water vapor, because the planet was smaller with an extremely hot surface. The water came from the material in space that was gathered by gravity to form the planet, and later on by the impacts of space debris, stardust and ice. Everything, including us, is made of it.
I have a theory based on the information available that describes the different stages of Earth's evolution, and this theory includes all scientific assertions, as well as the ancient scriptures stories of every ancient cultures. They all can work together as one. Everyone of us should be happy. The same happened about the latest transition about string theory, when 5 different versions of a ten-dimension universe, were unified by an eleven-dimension theory.
In this video the author looses the mark when he mixes the question of the origin of water on Earth, with that of the origin of the water of the biblical flood. Fact is that the ancient flood tales date back to end of the last glacial age, and it is fully documented that several regions of the planet's surface were wiped out by incredible volumes of water coming from the melting ice.
@InternetDarkLord Evidence of an all-earth-covered-by-water flood is inexistent. On the other hand, there is plenty, I mean, a lot evidence of sudden and simultaneous regional floods, caused by the sudden rupture of glacial lakes at the end of the last ice age. One of those ruptures could release as much water as of the Mediterranean Sea. If you want to chase facts about the fundamental biblical narration you are doomed to fail. The oral tradition of the scriptures was meant to be spiritual.
@InternetDarkLord Faith and Science must describe the same reality, otherwise they are useless. The Book of Genesis was not written as a textbook. I know that the creation took a lot more than six days, but I also know that it could have taken six seconds. Why? Because it doesn't matter!! But, if we read carefully, there is a lot in Genesis that is scientifically correct: eg. both of them say that life began in the water. I tell you that faith is a metaphore of science, and vice-versa.
@MrJotaLAS Millions of Americans think Genesis is literal. And almost any book has true facts, it would be more amazing if one didn't. Science does not need faith, and certainly not any specific faith.
Some creationists have said all animals were vegetarians before Noah's Farce, Genesis 1, verse 30, but sometimes fossil carnivores are preserved with prey inside their stomachs.
@richwfd2002 let he who is without fault throw the first stone. When was the last time YOU did anything for science? BTW, most intelligent Christians (yeah some aren't that bright, but that goes for atheists too) respect science greatly.
@InternetDarkLord OUCH, my poor evolved chemically based emotions are telling my ape-brain that my "feelings" are hurt (except we don't have "real" feelings, right? Because it's all just randomly, but perfectly synchronized chemicals developed in our brain over hundreds of millions of years, not by a non-existent God who created my soul that will spend eternity in paradise because God's son took my sins on himself). Yeah, I'm hurtin' here. You believe your religion, I'll believe mine.
lol your retarded.it coldn't have happen but yet they have discovered a boat hiigh atop a montain explain that then againn there was no atmosphere back then so some water has evaporated and drifted into space.so pinhead the third reason wee had an ice age so thats how we got the water we see.4th you said something about boiling and evaporation.yes.from that we got an atmosphere.and ice melted gave ice the oceans and polar caps we see today.so you dumbass yor science is off
Too easy to refute this video. I'm sure it's all been said before, so I'm not gonna troll. Atheists and scoffers need to open their eyes and use their brains. Also, read the parable of the sower. You may see yourself in it.
Dude, you should have refined this before posting it. There shouldn't have been any mistakes and the audio should have been much better. Use a pop filter. Sheesh! No 'uh's'! This is just very mediocre. Do better next time.
First, there are over 6000 documented accounts of the flood. These accounts are from every ancient civilization you could think of. Maybe they all just thought of it at the same time? Yea, its probably just coincidence huh?
Second, turn to the scientific community. It is not questioned whether the earth was covered in water in its current state (not the creation of our atmosphere).
With all of science and archeology that says the flood happened, I would like to hear how u think it happened.
@InternetDarkLord archeologists wont, because its hard to date an event like that. However, the scientific community does not deny that the world was covered in water IN ITS CURRENT STATE like I said before, please read what I typed. There are fossils and erosion patters even on the highest mountains and plateaus that will prove this.
So the question to you is "how did this happen?" you are very quick to try and disprove, well I am asking you to prove, if your so smart.
@InternetDarkLord Dontcha love how these religious nutbags will be the first to use the benefits of scientific research and yet denigrate science constantly? They all moralize about stemcell research and the fetus, but will be the first to try to reap the benefits of it if one of their fat, toothless, gullible, willfully ignorant, hypocritical, trailer-livin', pew-sittin', gluttonous, Faux "News" watching kin needs a new hand to raise the fried chicken to his/her mouth.
@forgetfuldays Yes, the science community does deny that water covered the world IN ITS CURRENT STATE. That is basic geology. Nothing you cited requires the earth covered completely by water at the same time.
So answer the question: What country has a majority of archeologists or geologists who believe the Genesis flood covered their country?
@forgetfuldays That is total bullfuck and you are a liar. No scientist believes that the whole world was covered with water in its current state. Ever hear of plate tectonics? Dope. Your emotional attachment to your belief does not make it true.
These "Flood"-themed videos attract some of the most presumptuous(and therefore, Satanist)viewers. It's like they stepped right out of Romans and Timothy; hard-hearted, hard-headed, vicious, arrogant, know-it-all, flesh-obsessed, ego-addicted, stubborn in their foolishness....it's fascinating that this mindset can persist in an age when the truth is so universally available: it's not even safe to feel pity for them; I leave them to God and Jesus Christ.
@buzzclick500 So everyone who disagrees with you on silly bronze age fairy tales is Satanic. People like you are why the Dark Ages lasted one thousand years.
@InternetDarkLord : I'll bet you have not once ever stopped to think about WHO coined the term "Dark Ages"...maybe it wasn't a good era for Satan and his minions....thinking hasn't been outlawed yet; why don't you give it a try? ;])
@InternetDarkLord : Because we know what GOD is thinking--He's very clear about it. Satan is the epitome and the origin of willful, pernicious ignorance, the dumbest creature in the universe.
@InternetDarkLord : He will, in fact, take possession of the globe for a very short period of time, and "if that time were not shortened, even the elect would not be saved." --Revelation
@buzzclick500 Why is Satan taking over? Hispanics, Blacks, Gays, Lesbians, Jews, Transgenders, Women, Muslims, and other groups are gaining equal rights all over the globe. Looks fine to me!
@InternetDarkLord : And which, or combination thereof, are you, if I may ask? "Equal rights" is a mighty subjective concept. One of Satan's main goals is to destroy coherent civilization and keep us fighting amongst ourselves over emotional trivialities. As I stated plainly and clearly, he WILL take over, and for a very SHORT TIME--THAT'S what his devotees don't like to hear, because after that, JESUS CHRIST RETURNS to clean things up and refurbish the earth for the faithful.
@buzzclick500 I am a heterosexual white atheist male, but unlike you, I don't go around hating people. If I want to know what a group wants for equal rights, I ask them and we talk. Without waving a Bible in their face. Bible waving is control.
You are aware that homophobia is often based on repressed homosexuality, right?
@InternetDarkLord : 1. Hating what people do is a very natural thing, and cannot be considered a criminal act in itself; 2. In America, all AMERICANS are GUARANTEED certain rights through our Constitution. Elaboration on that fact is unnecessary; 3. Every single one of us has entertained thoughts of a homosexual nature from time to time--most of us just don't act on them; 4. "Homophobia" = "fear of the same"(whatever the heck THAT means)--just another militant liberal buzzword.
@InternetDarkLord : Hating people IS wrong--hating some of the things they DO is perfectly legitimate. "Conservatives" don't know their butts from a hole in the ground--they sold out. On #3: I agree totally, emphatically and completely--leave 'em alone and let 'em make their own way. 4. Shouldn't be difficult to look up the actual definition......it's from Greek, by the way.
@InternetDarkLord : You might try taking some of these issues of dissatisfaction up with God; He's made His opinion on an unpleasant subject very clear, and occasionally backed that opinion up with firepower. Now He just leaves it up to us as individuals.
@buzzclick500 No, you just admitted that you hate things because of the talking donkey book. So have you given all your money to the poor? Marked your Hebrew slaves in the ear with an awl? Refuse to resist evil? Sold a daughter for the virgin's price? Never pray in public? Stone to death unruly children? Execute witches? Most important: Have you never been cut off from him who pisses against the wall?
@InternetDarkLord : I'm not resisting evil; I've given you a lot of time that I could have used for other things. If I were you, I'd feel downright complimented that someone like me would give you the time of day.
@buzzclick500 English Translation is "buzzclick500 will just cherry pick the Bible to say God wants him to hate some things......then ignore all the rest of it."
@InternetDarkLord : That's pretty much what I do; I tend to focus on Genesis, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Ya got me dead to rights, there. Oh, and Revelation. I read that a lot, since it talks about my future.
@InternetDarkLord : There are Christians among Hispanics, Blacks and women. The others have voluntarily rejected and shut themselves off from the benefits of that situation. A choice is a choice. People who harp on their "rights" don't want rights, they want CONTROL. There's a difference. I remind them that they have the right to remain silent, then they ask me to leave. Which I'm happy to do.
@buzzclick500 No, there are Christian Gays, Lesbians, and Transgenders, and your religion is no more true than Jews or Muslims. People who rights want RIGHTS, that is not control. How exactly are gays controlling your life?
@buzzclick500 Explain your sentence "People who harp on their rights don't want rights, they want CONTROL." How is somebody else wanting rights control?
@InternetDarkLord : The best way to wear someone down is to ask them questions no matter how they respond each time--until they catch on to the game and walk away to enjoy more serious and productive conversation.
@buzzclick500 I only asked you to explain your beliefs because you make vague comments that sound hateful. You even said hating is not criminal! Refusing to answer such simple questions often results from knowing that you can't explain your own false beliefs.
@InternetDarkLord : God has indicated that He hates certain things, and I was created in his image and likeness. If He hates it, I hate it. Hating something can actually be indicative of a solid character. I like some things, and I dislike others. Machines can't do that, and some folks want humans to BE controllable machines. I simply CHOOSE to be me. That in itself is sufficient to cause all kinds of trouble these days. ;])
@InternetDarkLord : Since being a priest involves denying the urges of the body(I hope the pope reads this), I'd look a little more thoroughly into that concept if I were you.
@InternetDarkLord : Priests are not supposed to be interested in money or sex. Whoever came up with the idea that such a thing could actually work in the human world?
@InternetDarkLord : Thinking is over-rated; hating is universal--we all feel it for one thing or another. You obviously hate me, and yet, I'm strangely unaffected by it. I guess a lot of it depends on who's doing the hating.
People tell themselves whatever makes them feel more comfortable and secure. In my case, I tell myself that Jesus Christ is coming back to clean house. Since I don't know when, it makes me aware and careful in my thoughts and behavior. I'm going to one place or the other, and I don't like heat.
@Ledwix : Hopelessness and cynicism are not intellectual assets; they represent spiritual sickness. You've been around for thousands of years to personally observe these things? Yes, in a sense, I suppose your type(collective thinkers)has... ;/
@buzzclick500 No, I haven't been around for thousands of years, only a couple decades. But I haven't yet come across the slightest demonstration pointing toward the existence of heaven or hell, either personally or through someone else's careful objective documentation. These "I went to hell and back" stories are crazy dreams or hallucinations. If we are to trust those stories, then I've also been abducted by aliens and chased by an evil movie villain on a flying pogo stick.
By what standard can you judge spiritual sickness and differentiate it from genuine, deserved cynicism? I could just as easily say you are the spiritually dead one for being cynical about the idea of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. And you wouldn't want me to get into His gospel and create a demon out of you for not following Him.
"We all know that that could not have happened" Fuu-nnnyyy. Just assume it away, eh? What about the next time when it happens with FIRE? Well, we all know that that can't happen, right? ;])
It say in the Genesis story that the fountains of the deep and the vapor above both were open. So you have water from two sources. Once the water from beneath comes up, these hydrologic events would neccessarily cause the plates to begin to shift. As thse water jets are forced upward, they would blast away all the soil along the edges, increasing their size, the land mass above would begin to colapse and move, creating even more pressure and covering the entire existing earth with water.
This isn't all too bad, but the author (video author or whatever) needs to learn how to present without sounding like he is chewing on gum or whatever it was plugging him up during the show... As far as debunking the Bible flood story: I don't have a problem with it but please, try an explain how we got our water-- it did not come primarily from comets as revealed by NASA-- the water on comets have hydrogen-2 which we have here on Earth, but not of the same concentration...
but i dont care ill pull down my underwear and let your mom suck my stinky cock that smells like a trucker whacking off numerous times on a long haul across state lines.
ps. If you would melt the poles. Spew all the water from the mantle like me spewing sperm on your moms face. The whole world would be filled up by my water sperm. The idiot here thinks that the mantle is like 900 degrees and it is in some spots thats why my water sperm doesn't reside there it resides in your moms black hole pussy hole with a mole. Look up those huge crystals they found in south America, Mexico i believe? Theres water there. Water everywhere.
Or a comet killed the dinosaurs. Or the flood killed the dinosaurs. Either way i dont know. But i know geology better than you silly dumb guy. And i am modest to admit i wasn't there so the question is still a mystery. But if you combine all the theories and geology facts you have a better explanation of what happen. Aristotle once said a idiot is one who focuses on on theory as fact is dumb dumb and i dont mean the sucker mother fucker or should i say butter finger wiener eater.
@InternetDarkLord Apparently your dumb ass doesn't know the difference between a astroid, comet, meteor or meteorite. Should i educate your silly ass or will you finger fuck your key pad on google.
@DeliverySIX Read a science book on the formation of the solar system IDIOT. Water occurs naturally in the solar system, but how did the sea rise 6 miles in 40 days?
@InternetDarkLord The Earth retard. If all the volcanoes erupted the mantle would release enough water to fill the earths oceans ten times over. dame your dumb. go away titty sucker.
@DeliverySIX Do you have evidence all those volcanoes erupted all at the same time? Where did the water go after the flood? Why aren't the geologists of the world aware of this amazing event, instead of a raving loon on the Internet?
@InternetDarkLord Parts of the earth cant hold water for long periods of time. Thats why when you build a dame or pond you have to import clay and compact it. You need a fucking geology lesson dont you? Here it is this is where water came from. A super nova blew the fuck up when the sun started to create iron. Parts of the explosion contained water.. Little happy water vapors flew towards the new forming earth millions of years ago creating steam, creating a atmosphere.
Comets passed by and dumped little happy water vapors on earth. Since earth happens to be so close to the sun it is a happy water party. During the dinosaurs the poles were much bigger. There was water surrounding the earth but not as much as the theories state. They were ice balls not some silly water circle ddaaaa its space. During moses a pole shift or another planet or what ever passed by aand disrupted the earth and melted the poles and caused volcanoes to erupt.
@DeliverySIX Are you serious? Moses is not in the Flood Myth. Comets contain cyanide and carbon monoxide, so a flood would be unnecessary. The earth's poles have no size, they are points unaffected by dinosaurs. What planet are you talking about? There is also only enough polar ice to raise the ocean 600 feet. Nothing you say is too coherent. So, are you a Poe?
@InternetDarkLord Whats a POE? You need to do research on geology before you can battle with me looser. I am going to numb numb your moms vagina sucka.
First off were dealing with super natural events, the animals could have gotten on the ark and hybernated for the time it took for the waters to abate. God can do anything. The bible says that the ground water itself from below, so this water was ejected from the ground and it also rained.
@InternetDarkLord Yes I have. The center of the earth is hot, I agree, but it depends on how deep you go if you go say 5 miles unber the earth its not really that hot, actually it gets cooler as you go deeper, up until a point. So the water table theory is plausable.
The great flood of Noah's time happened in what was the Black Sea and Caspian Sea area about 10,000 years ago. This flood was caused by the Mediterranean overflowing into this low laying, previously dry, area. The ocean level is rising at a rate of 18cm every 100 years at the moment and this is because more and more water is being produced by methanogens, an early form of life. Water is a product of their metabolism where they reduce carbon dioxide using hydrogen. More at evolutionem.co.uk
planmet 1 week ago
Is it possible that if God does exist and did create everything from the beginning like the bible says, that... he could have modified the laws of science to allow this to happen? The laws of science are impossible to ignore and solid but who created the Laws?? I'm Just Searching4DatTruth
Searching4DatTruth 1 month ago
@Searching4DatTruth Physics laws need no creation.
If God can change those laws, why have a flood at all? He can solve problems without killing.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
What is capable of heating the atmosphere and the oceans up to thousands of degrees, wouldn't be able to heat the much greater volume of the mantle lithosphere to any great extent. Distributed , it would cause several degrees centrigrade of heat increase in the mantle. But more likely, was that fierce but localized heating would take place along the pathways of subduction down in the mantle. Most heat would dissipate into the surrounding lithosphere, but some would be released as volcanism.
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 Pure hogwash, many processes like limestone formation would add more heat, volcanism just dumps all that heat into the air and water.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
Hogwash is useful in cleaning out hoggish objections. Volcanism would find it difficult to dump very much of that energy up to the surface of the earth. Most of it (in runaway thermal subduction) is generated on it's way down to the bottom of the mantle as friction. How is all but a small amount of that friction heat going to magically rise up through many hundreds of miles of the mantles lithosphere to cook the surface? The proportion released would be relatively small.
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 Pure nonsense, water only 10 miles down would not heat the deep earth. Far more would heat the surface on a planet our size.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
I'm not referring to Walt Brown's hydroplate hypothesis. I'm talking about Baumgardner's CPT (catastrophic plate tectonics - the mechanism being runaway thermal subduction).
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 Noah's Flood never happened, so that is irrelevant.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
Given that the arguments put up against it don't see to be holding up too well, I'd say our discussions are on a very relevant topic. The deluge explains various landforms and features that are rather hard to explain otherwise.
But most importantly, it would make a great movie - and it scares the heck out of one just thinking about what it would have been like! Mmm, Mmm!
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 Are you on LSD? I'm soft drugs only, thank you.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
Comment removed
tubewatch59 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InternetDarkLord
Crack cocoaine! It's real hard. Drugs must be hard and cause violence, or they're not the real deal. My drug leads me to violence. Early one morning while making the rounds, I took a shot of cocoaine and I shot my woman down. I went right home and I went to bed, I put that lovin' 44 beneath my head. Got up next morning and I grabbed that gun. I took a shot of cocoaine and away I run. Made a good run, but I run too slow. They overtook me down in Juarez Mexico...
tubewatch59 2 months ago
(5) There have been criticisms that the 10^28 Joules of potential energy released in the process would boil the oceans many times over - ie. cook the surface of the planet to many thousands of degrees - an implausible scenario by any standards!!
However, the vast majority of this conversion of gravitational potential energy to heat energy would have taken place as the subducted material sank hundres of miles down to the bottom of the mantle. How would this heat reach back up to the surface?
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 Pure nonsense, there is no evidence of this.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
What is nonsense that thee is no evidence of?
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 Water only 10 miles deep would reach the surface long before deep inside the earth. You just make things up as you go along!
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
(4) What Baumgardners theory proposes is that the subduction of the relatively dense ocean floors enabled the hotter and less dense (because of temperature and composition) material to vertically uplift because of bouyancu effects. Thus the ocean floors were pushed up (along with all the water in them) with the result that the oceans overtopped the continents for a while until the process completed and the formation of higher density ocean floors once again lowered them, taking the water back.
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 There is no evidence for this.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
(3) In runaway thermal subduction the process is so rapid that the subducting crust doesn't 'wait around" for more crust to form first. It just gets pulled down by it's own higher density at a calculated speed of up to tens of meters per second. In my opinion, the ocean would for the most part, be heated, but not boiled by the hot layer left behind on the bottom. In addition this layer would be cooled by the ocean, forming an insulating skin on the new ocean floor hindering further heating...
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 Nonsense, there is no evidence for this.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
(2) With Baumgardners runaway termal subduction idea, you mentioned that the thermal diffusivity of the water is artificially (and ridiculously) too high. But there's a reason for that. He has to do that in order to get the simulation to behave realistically at the large grid size. If a much smaller scale grid size were used (ie. if computers were much more powerful than they are at the moment) then he wouldn't have to do that. It's just an artefact of the limitations of the grid size.
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 The specific heat of water is just a fact of nature, computers are irrelevant.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
We're talking about computer simulations. Details are very relevant.
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 Yes, the specific heat of water is an important detail that shows your full of hogwash.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
The specific heat of water is conveniently a rather large value. Good for life, and good for flood mechanics. It's capable of cooling quite a lot of heat!
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 It heats slowly, but it retains heat, and all that geothermal heat plus limestone formation plus all the meteor impacts in the earth's geology hydroplate theory would require if you include the sedimentary layers as "flood layers" would boil all the water on earth. High specific heat means it does not dissipate heat quickly. The earth would roast.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
I want to point out some likely errors:
(1) Though I don't neccessarily agree with the hydroplate theory myself, remember that the water being discussed in Brown's idea is 10 miles down, so the large pressure increase at that depth would rather easily prevent water from boiling at much higher temperatures. Brown's theory also suggests the water was in the supercritical state. We see that happening in deep submarine volcanoes which cannot boil the water due to the high pressures down there.
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 On what physical evidence?
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
@InternetDarkLord
What ??? on what physical evidence?
tubewatch59 2 months ago
@tubewatch59 There is no evidence of hydroplates. The earth's crust is too brittle, the whole situation would be too unstable to last long enough for the Bible chronology.
InternetDarkLord 2 months ago
I know that could not have happened? that's what you say when your an ignorant fool! Good day.
truthseeker010101 3 months ago
@truthseeker010101 That's not what he said.
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InternetDarkLord watch it again
truthseeker010101 3 months ago
@truthseeker010101 What time?
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
Way to much work, and you ignored the most obvious possibility. Even god needs to relieve him/herself every once in a millennium or so.
veggiescrub 4 months ago
2:48 water boils at 100 degrees Celsius, not Fahrenheit. small mistake.
igotsachubby 4 months ago
Why is it so hard for these creatards to say "magick dun dun it"?
TheCaptainLulz 5 months ago 4
So he puts ethics, scientific clues and others theories in something that requires fate,knowledge, and heart, doubt or not if he speaks without faith (which he is) he speaks of man theories, n only what he's read from books and articles something completely different of what's God, The bible, FAITH, and heart
lagamer4life 5 months ago
@lagamer4life Where does he say that? I missed it!
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
No Ice ages in Bible but people bear witness that the Angel Gabriel gave direct enlightenment about Noah, floods & everything else similar to the Bible (God's word) in the Quran?
PhilDobson2010 5 months ago
@PhilDobson2010 Speak English.
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
Even the book of Genesis states that the Earth fattened. But before that, it was covered by liquid water and surrounded by a heavy atmosphere mostly composed of water vapor, because the planet was smaller with an extremely hot surface. The water came from the material in space that was gathered by gravity to form the planet, and later on by the impacts of space debris, stardust and ice. Everything, including us, is made of it.
MrJotaLAS 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a theory based on the information available that describes the different stages of Earth's evolution, and this theory includes all scientific assertions, as well as the ancient scriptures stories of every ancient cultures. They all can work together as one. Everyone of us should be happy. The same happened about the latest transition about string theory, when 5 different versions of a ten-dimension universe, were unified by an eleven-dimension theory.
MrJotaLAS 6 months ago
In this video the author looses the mark when he mixes the question of the origin of water on Earth, with that of the origin of the water of the biblical flood. Fact is that the ancient flood tales date back to end of the last glacial age, and it is fully documented that several regions of the planet's surface were wiped out by incredible volumes of water coming from the melting ice.
MrJotaLAS 6 months ago
@MrJotaLAS That is not the same thing, though. Sea level rise since the Ice Ages is vast, but not global.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Evidence of an all-earth-covered-by-water flood is inexistent. On the other hand, there is plenty, I mean, a lot evidence of sudden and simultaneous regional floods, caused by the sudden rupture of glacial lakes at the end of the last ice age. One of those ruptures could release as much water as of the Mediterranean Sea. If you want to chase facts about the fundamental biblical narration you are doomed to fail. The oral tradition of the scriptures was meant to be spiritual.
MrJotaLAS 6 months ago
@MrJotaLAS I was talking about Bible literalists who believe in a global flood, but there are literalists who insist on a smaller one.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Faith and Science must describe the same reality, otherwise they are useless. The Book of Genesis was not written as a textbook. I know that the creation took a lot more than six days, but I also know that it could have taken six seconds. Why? Because it doesn't matter!! But, if we read carefully, there is a lot in Genesis that is scientifically correct: eg. both of them say that life began in the water. I tell you that faith is a metaphore of science, and vice-versa.
MrJotaLAS 5 months ago
@MrJotaLAS Millions of Americans think Genesis is literal. And almost any book has true facts, it would be more amazing if one didn't. Science does not need faith, and certainly not any specific faith.
InternetDarkLord 5 months ago
@MrJotaLAS "" there is a lot in Genesis that is scientifically correct: ""
No, there are a few statements in genesis that show thatthe people who wrote it had observed a couple of basic things about the world.
''that faith is a metaphore of science, and vice-versa''
No. Science is based on observable evidence. Faith is the excuse people use when they beleive in something without any evidence
podoau 4 months ago 5
Comment removed
MrJotaLAS 6 months ago
Some creationists have said all animals were vegetarians before Noah's Farce, Genesis 1, verse 30, but sometimes fossil carnivores are preserved with prey inside their stomachs.
InternetDarkLord 7 months ago 2
It was the latest iceage - the melting water from both northern and southern hemisphere......Nuff said...
landulf88 7 months ago
@InternetDarkLord I'd honestly love it if I could give it to you for free. The secret is, you have to get it yourself.
dinopad10 7 months ago
@richwfd2002 let he who is without fault throw the first stone. When was the last time YOU did anything for science? BTW, most intelligent Christians (yeah some aren't that bright, but that goes for atheists too) respect science greatly.
dinopad10 7 months ago
@InternetDarkLord OUCH, my poor evolved chemically based emotions are telling my ape-brain that my "feelings" are hurt (except we don't have "real" feelings, right? Because it's all just randomly, but perfectly synchronized chemicals developed in our brain over hundreds of millions of years, not by a non-existent God who created my soul that will spend eternity in paradise because God's son took my sins on himself). Yeah, I'm hurtin' here. You believe your religion, I'll believe mine.
dinopad10 7 months ago
@dinopad10 What are you smoking?
I'll give you 100$ per ounce.
InternetDarkLord 7 months ago
Wow, can we study anything without religious BULLSHIT in the way.
iamrobertheman 7 months ago
lol your retarded.it coldn't have happen but yet they have discovered a boat hiigh atop a montain explain that then againn there was no atmosphere back then so some water has evaporated and drifted into space.so pinhead the third reason wee had an ice age so thats how we got the water we see.4th you said something about boiling and evaporation.yes.from that we got an atmosphere.and ice melted gave ice the oceans and polar caps we see today.so you dumbass yor science is off
gcrawford304 7 months ago
Too easy to refute this video. I'm sure it's all been said before, so I'm not gonna troll. Atheists and scoffers need to open their eyes and use their brains. Also, read the parable of the sower. You may see yourself in it.
dinopad10 7 months ago
@dinopad10 No! You have displeased the Feathered Serpent God! He will demand virgin sacrifice! Just read ancient Mayan, and you will see clearly!
InternetDarkLord 7 months ago
Dude, you should have refined this before posting it. There shouldn't have been any mistakes and the audio should have been much better. Use a pop filter. Sheesh! No 'uh's'! This is just very mediocre. Do better next time.
lancethrustworthy 8 months ago
First, there are over 6000 documented accounts of the flood. These accounts are from every ancient civilization you could think of. Maybe they all just thought of it at the same time? Yea, its probably just coincidence huh?
Second, turn to the scientific community. It is not questioned whether the earth was covered in water in its current state (not the creation of our atmosphere).
With all of science and archeology that says the flood happened, I would like to hear how u think it happened.
forgetfuldays 8 months ago 2
@forgetfuldays There are thousands of floods, they don't refer to the same thing. There are millions of shipwreck reports, too
Second, that was billions of years ago, nobody was around.
Third, name one single country, out of almost 200, where mainstream archeologists believe that the Genesis Flood matches their history.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord archeologists wont, because its hard to date an event like that. However, the scientific community does not deny that the world was covered in water IN ITS CURRENT STATE like I said before, please read what I typed. There are fossils and erosion patters even on the highest mountains and plateaus that will prove this.
So the question to you is "how did this happen?" you are very quick to try and disprove, well I am asking you to prove, if your so smart.
forgetfuldays 8 months ago
@forgetfuldays Bull Shit, erosion or fossils don't require ONE flood, and the Flood dates can be disproven by: coral reef layering, dendrochronology, fossil indexes, geomagnetic dating, lichenometry, Milankovitch cycles, Mitochondrial DNA, obsidian hydration, ocean sediment cores, rock patination, polar ice sheet cores, pollen/spore analysis, radiometric dating, thermoluminescence, varve analysis, writing, want more?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Dontcha love how these religious nutbags will be the first to use the benefits of scientific research and yet denigrate science constantly? They all moralize about stemcell research and the fetus, but will be the first to try to reap the benefits of it if one of their fat, toothless, gullible, willfully ignorant, hypocritical, trailer-livin', pew-sittin', gluttonous, Faux "News" watching kin needs a new hand to raise the fried chicken to his/her mouth.
richwfd2002 7 months ago
@forgetfuldays Yes, the science community does deny that water covered the world IN ITS CURRENT STATE. That is basic geology. Nothing you cited requires the earth covered completely by water at the same time.
So answer the question: What country has a majority of archeologists or geologists who believe the Genesis flood covered their country?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@forgetfuldays That is total bullfuck and you are a liar. No scientist believes that the whole world was covered with water in its current state. Ever hear of plate tectonics? Dope. Your emotional attachment to your belief does not make it true.
GROW
THE FUCK
UP
richwfd2002 7 months ago 2
2:45 "Water boils at 100 degrees Fahrenheit."
No, water boils at 100 degrees Celsius.
FreeTunes498 8 months ago
@FreeTunes498 heard that but I'd say he just misspoke.
jnthnbush 8 months ago
Previously, I was averse to shoving the truth down people's throats, but the way things are going these days, I'm like, oh, what the heck. ;])
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 WOW! When were you shy about your opinions?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
'noah's ark' i'm thinking lots of bottles filled with dna samples...
FreedomRebel 8 months ago
Thermal disufisitusivity--that's easy for YOU to say. ;])
buzzclick500 8 months ago
These "Flood"-themed videos attract some of the most presumptuous(and therefore, Satanist)viewers. It's like they stepped right out of Romans and Timothy; hard-hearted, hard-headed, vicious, arrogant, know-it-all, flesh-obsessed, ego-addicted, stubborn in their foolishness....it's fascinating that this mindset can persist in an age when the truth is so universally available: it's not even safe to feel pity for them; I leave them to God and Jesus Christ.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 So everyone who disagrees with you on silly bronze age fairy tales is Satanic. People like you are why the Dark Ages lasted one thousand years.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : I'll bet you have not once ever stopped to think about WHO coined the term "Dark Ages"...maybe it wasn't a good era for Satan and his minions....thinking hasn't been outlawed yet; why don't you give it a try? ;])
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 I do think. For example, I always wonder, "How did zealots like you know what Satan is thinking?"
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : Because we know what GOD is thinking--He's very clear about it. Satan is the epitome and the origin of willful, pernicious ignorance, the dumbest creature in the universe.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 Satan is taking your turf.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : He will, in fact, take possession of the globe for a very short period of time, and "if that time were not shortened, even the elect would not be saved." --Revelation
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 Why is Satan taking over? Hispanics, Blacks, Gays, Lesbians, Jews, Transgenders, Women, Muslims, and other groups are gaining equal rights all over the globe. Looks fine to me!
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : And which, or combination thereof, are you, if I may ask? "Equal rights" is a mighty subjective concept. One of Satan's main goals is to destroy coherent civilization and keep us fighting amongst ourselves over emotional trivialities. As I stated plainly and clearly, he WILL take over, and for a very SHORT TIME--THAT'S what his devotees don't like to hear, because after that, JESUS CHRIST RETURNS to clean things up and refurbish the earth for the faithful.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 I am a heterosexual white atheist male, but unlike you, I don't go around hating people. If I want to know what a group wants for equal rights, I ask them and we talk. Without waving a Bible in their face. Bible waving is control.
You are aware that homophobia is often based on repressed homosexuality, right?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : 1. Hating what people do is a very natural thing, and cannot be considered a criminal act in itself; 2. In America, all AMERICANS are GUARANTEED certain rights through our Constitution. Elaboration on that fact is unnecessary; 3. Every single one of us has entertained thoughts of a homosexual nature from time to time--most of us just don't act on them; 4. "Homophobia" = "fear of the same"(whatever the heck THAT means)--just another militant liberal buzzword.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 1. Hating people is still wrong.
2. Conservatives have amended state constitutions to deny gays or lesbians rights like marriage.
3. If somebody else wants to act on their nature without bothering me, hetero or homo, I don't care.
4. Homophobia means fear of homosexuality, often caused by repressed homosexual desires.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : Hating people IS wrong--hating some of the things they DO is perfectly legitimate. "Conservatives" don't know their butts from a hole in the ground--they sold out. On #3: I agree totally, emphatically and completely--leave 'em alone and let 'em make their own way. 4. Shouldn't be difficult to look up the actual definition......it's from Greek, by the way.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 1. There is no reason to hate things homosexuals do. It leads to hating people.
2. People like you are why conservatives passed those amendments, it followed from hating things people do. Do you oppose the amendments then?
3. But that does not make hating things people do OK.
4. You just play word games. Call hating homosexuality what you will, it changes nothing.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : You might try taking some of these issues of dissatisfaction up with God; He's made His opinion on an unpleasant subject very clear, and occasionally backed that opinion up with firepower. Now He just leaves it up to us as individuals.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 No, you just admitted that you hate things because of the talking donkey book. So have you given all your money to the poor? Marked your Hebrew slaves in the ear with an awl? Refuse to resist evil? Sold a daughter for the virgin's price? Never pray in public? Stone to death unruly children? Execute witches? Most important: Have you never been cut off from him who pisses against the wall?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : I'm not resisting evil; I've given you a lot of time that I could have used for other things. If I were you, I'd feel downright complimented that someone like me would give you the time of day.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 English Translation is "buzzclick500 will just cherry pick the Bible to say God wants him to hate some things......then ignore all the rest of it."
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : That's pretty much what I do; I tend to focus on Genesis, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Ya got me dead to rights, there. Oh, and Revelation. I read that a lot, since it talks about my future.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 Your only future is Prozac in a padded cell.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : There are Christians among Hispanics, Blacks and women. The others have voluntarily rejected and shut themselves off from the benefits of that situation. A choice is a choice. People who harp on their "rights" don't want rights, they want CONTROL. There's a difference. I remind them that they have the right to remain silent, then they ask me to leave. Which I'm happy to do.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 No, there are Christian Gays, Lesbians, and Transgenders, and your religion is no more true than Jews or Muslims. People who rights want RIGHTS, that is not control. How exactly are gays controlling your life?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : "People who rights want RIGHTS, that is not control."......you wanna run that by me again, please?
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 Explain your sentence "People who harp on their rights don't want rights, they want CONTROL." How is somebody else wanting rights control?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : The best way to wear someone down is to ask them questions no matter how they respond each time--until they catch on to the game and walk away to enjoy more serious and productive conversation.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 I only asked you to explain your beliefs because you make vague comments that sound hateful. You even said hating is not criminal! Refusing to answer such simple questions often results from knowing that you can't explain your own false beliefs.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : God has indicated that He hates certain things, and I was created in his image and likeness. If He hates it, I hate it. Hating something can actually be indicative of a solid character. I like some things, and I dislike others. Machines can't do that, and some folks want humans to BE controllable machines. I simply CHOOSE to be me. That in itself is sufficient to cause all kinds of trouble these days. ;])
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 No, you choose to hate things people do because of a fundamentalist interpretation of a bronze age fairy tale.
Also, some gays and lesbians are Christians, even priests. They just choose in a different way from you.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : Since being a priest involves denying the urges of the body(I hope the pope reads this), I'd look a little more thoroughly into that concept if I were you.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 So why is a heterosexual priest any different?
Only eunuch ones from now on?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : Priests are not supposed to be interested in money or sex. Whoever came up with the idea that such a thing could actually work in the human world?
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 OK, then why not gay or lesbian laity?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : God and Jesus Christ can answer that for you better than I can. I tend to concentrate on healthy, pleasant subject matter.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 English Translation is "buzzclick500 just blindly believes this bull shit, don't make him think!"
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : "She was lookin' kinda dumb, with her finger and her thumb in the shape of an "L" on her fore-head....."
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 Coherent as usual.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : Just free.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 Free from thinking, yes.
Free from hating, no.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@InternetDarkLord : Thinking is over-rated; hating is universal--we all feel it for one thing or another. You obviously hate me, and yet, I'm strangely unaffected by it. I guess a lot of it depends on who's doing the hating.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 I don't hate you, I think you have emotional issues. Call 800-969-6642 and talk.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 People have said that for 2000 years, why is this one different from the prior 1,999?
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
>YAWN<
buzzclick500 8 months ago
People tell themselves whatever makes them feel more comfortable and secure. In my case, I tell myself that Jesus Christ is coming back to clean house. Since I don't know when, it makes me aware and careful in my thoughts and behavior. I'm going to one place or the other, and I don't like heat.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 You're not going anywhere. Heaven and hell are imaginary, and nobody in thousands of years has been able to demonstrate otherwise.
Ledwix 8 months ago
@Ledwix : Hopelessness and cynicism are not intellectual assets; they represent spiritual sickness. You've been around for thousands of years to personally observe these things? Yes, in a sense, I suppose your type(collective thinkers)has... ;/
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 No, I haven't been around for thousands of years, only a couple decades. But I haven't yet come across the slightest demonstration pointing toward the existence of heaven or hell, either personally or through someone else's careful objective documentation. These "I went to hell and back" stories are crazy dreams or hallucinations. If we are to trust those stories, then I've also been abducted by aliens and chased by an evil movie villain on a flying pogo stick.
Ledwix 8 months ago
By what standard can you judge spiritual sickness and differentiate it from genuine, deserved cynicism? I could just as easily say you are the spiritually dead one for being cynical about the idea of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. And you wouldn't want me to get into His gospel and create a demon out of you for not following Him.
Ledwix 8 months ago
@Ledwix : I'm 56. When I was your age, my thoughts on this subject were identical to your own.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
"We all know that that could not have happened" Fuu-nnnyyy. Just assume it away, eh? What about the next time when it happens with FIRE? Well, we all know that that can't happen, right? ;])
buzzclick500 8 months ago
@buzzclick500 No, it can't.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
It say in the Genesis story that the fountains of the deep and the vapor above both were open. So you have water from two sources. Once the water from beneath comes up, these hydrologic events would neccessarily cause the plates to begin to shift. As thse water jets are forced upward, they would blast away all the soil along the edges, increasing their size, the land mass above would begin to colapse and move, creating even more pressure and covering the entire existing earth with water.
pocketspy 8 months ago
@pocketspy No, even a mere 3 miles of water in each source is still insufficient and impossible.
InternetDarkLord 8 months ago
@pocketspy : You're blessed.
buzzclick500 8 months ago
This isn't all too bad, but the author (video author or whatever) needs to learn how to present without sounding like he is chewing on gum or whatever it was plugging him up during the show... As far as debunking the Bible flood story: I don't have a problem with it but please, try an explain how we got our water-- it did not come primarily from comets as revealed by NASA-- the water on comets have hydrogen-2 which we have here on Earth, but not of the same concentration...
RayTech70 9 months ago
your an idiot, and no, I'm not religious. Your a bad scientist.
billybobjoesally 9 months ago
@billybobjoesally I love it when people who can't write a coherent sentence correctly call somebody else an idiot.
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
i like the part were "it litteraly will burn the skin of noha"
X2trust 9 months ago
but i dont care ill pull down my underwear and let your mom suck my stinky cock that smells like a trucker whacking off numerous times on a long haul across state lines.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX I would swear you are a Poe, but you are clearly overacting.
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
ps. If you would melt the poles. Spew all the water from the mantle like me spewing sperm on your moms face. The whole world would be filled up by my water sperm. The idiot here thinks that the mantle is like 900 degrees and it is in some spots thats why my water sperm doesn't reside there it resides in your moms black hole pussy hole with a mole. Look up those huge crystals they found in south America, Mexico i believe? Theres water there. Water everywhere.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX Are you off your Prozac?
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
Or a comet killed the dinosaurs. Or the flood killed the dinosaurs. Either way i dont know. But i know geology better than you silly dumb guy. And i am modest to admit i wasn't there so the question is still a mystery. But if you combine all the theories and geology facts you have a better explanation of what happen. Aristotle once said a idiot is one who focuses on on theory as fact is dumb dumb and i dont mean the sucker mother fucker or should i say butter finger wiener eater.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX If you really knew geology, you would know that the comet was 65 million years ago. Read a geology book.
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Apparently your dumb ass doesn't know the difference between a astroid, comet, meteor or meteorite. Should i educate your silly ass or will you finger fuck your key pad on google.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX 800-969-6642
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
well while your at it faggot tell us where water on earth came from in the first place IDIOT
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX Read a science book on the formation of the solar system IDIOT. Water occurs naturally in the solar system, but how did the sea rise 6 miles in 40 days?
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@InternetDarkLord The Earth retard. If all the volcanoes erupted the mantle would release enough water to fill the earths oceans ten times over. dame your dumb. go away titty sucker.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX Do you have evidence all those volcanoes erupted all at the same time? Where did the water go after the flood? Why aren't the geologists of the world aware of this amazing event, instead of a raving loon on the Internet?
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Jack ass... They teach this in college.. Where do you think water goes when it rains? It sinks into the ground daaaaaaaaaaaa.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX It does not go far. Are you a Poe?
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Parts of the earth cant hold water for long periods of time. Thats why when you build a dame or pond you have to import clay and compact it. You need a fucking geology lesson dont you? Here it is this is where water came from. A super nova blew the fuck up when the sun started to create iron. Parts of the explosion contained water.. Little happy water vapors flew towards the new forming earth millions of years ago creating steam, creating a atmosphere.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX What college teaches your nonsense?
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
Comets passed by and dumped little happy water vapors on earth. Since earth happens to be so close to the sun it is a happy water party. During the dinosaurs the poles were much bigger. There was water surrounding the earth but not as much as the theories state. They were ice balls not some silly water circle ddaaaa its space. During moses a pole shift or another planet or what ever passed by aand disrupted the earth and melted the poles and caused volcanoes to erupt.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
Comment removed
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX Are you serious? Moses is not in the Flood Myth. Comets contain cyanide and carbon monoxide, so a flood would be unnecessary. The earth's poles have no size, they are points unaffected by dinosaurs. What planet are you talking about? There is also only enough polar ice to raise the ocean 600 feet. Nothing you say is too coherent. So, are you a Poe?
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Whats a POE? You need to do research on geology before you can battle with me looser. I am going to numb numb your moms vagina sucka.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX 800-969-6642
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX Yep. Edgar Allen. Not even very original, either.
NorthForkFisherman 9 months ago
@InternetDarkLord THERE IS ENOUGH WATER ON THIS EARTH TO FILL THE OCEANS TEN TIMES OVER JACK ASS.
DeliverySIX 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DeliverySIX 800-969-6642
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@DeliverySIX Hehe sure.
There is not enough waten in the whole solar system to do that, moron.
Hyeesa 8 months ago
It was a simple catastrophic flood when one ocean breeched a landmass to another ocean...If it happened at all but history shows this has happened.
budedees 9 months ago
@budedees Are you referring to the formation of the Black Sea? There has been much ruckus on the Internet on this one.
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
what? water boils at 100 degrees celcius not F. your wrong.
RespectMyHate 9 months ago
First off were dealing with super natural events, the animals could have gotten on the ark and hybernated for the time it took for the waters to abate. God can do anything. The bible says that the ground water itself from below, so this water was ejected from the ground and it also rained.
RespectMyHate 9 months ago
@RespectMyHate Have you ever heard of geothermal heat?
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Yes I have. The center of the earth is hot, I agree, but it depends on how deep you go if you go say 5 miles unber the earth its not really that hot, actually it gets cooler as you go deeper, up until a point. So the water table theory is plausable.
RespectMyHate 9 months ago
@RespectMyHate No, the temperature rises 25 to 30 C per kilometer. And water boils at 100.
InternetDarkLord 9 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Yes 100 C, the dude in the video said water boils at 100 F, which is wrong.
RespectMyHate 9 months ago