China doesn't have any conclusive evidence about the Nanking Massacre. However, they have appealed the massacre was true story. Even the Chinese historians, they could not prove the stupid false story to Americans.
In fact, the Nanking population increased to 277,000 from 200,000. Also all of the Nanking Massacre pictures were fabricated by Chinese government. Moreover, well-known witnesses about it admitted their stories were hearsay.
The Nanking Massacre was a false story, which was created by KMT.
The massacre did not have any witnesses, and the population was increased in 1938. Moreover, Chinese government edited, created, and trimmed 143 pictures in the Nanking Massacre Museum.
They wish the massacre was a true story because China has lot of human right problems. While Chinese people are accusing Japan over the massacre, Chinese dictatorial regime must be safe.
U.S. 4-star General Wesley Clark (Ret.), explains that the Bush Administration planned to take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran (2007 upto 2012)
/watch?v=lpBAC9dPr-o
"Japan’s government, threatened with more HAARP attacks, pays 60 trillion yen to Feds"
Nowadays people can reseach many mummies which was find in Egypt. Many mummies was buried almost 5000 years ago. However, we can find what the cause of dead of them, or what did they eat before they died, and so on. The so called Nanking Masacre was occured almost 70 years ago. China can find the details from the dead bodies. Why they don't want to reserch about the massacre? Why they could not find any conclusive evidence about that?
@makokun9 (Part1)Even in the Nanjing Incident Recent Research, Chinese historians and communists could not prove the Nanking Massacre. They are still trying showing many fabricated pictures, fake videos which were filmed movie producers, and telling a Chinese victim’s story which was from different areas and different times. IT’s a crazy, illogical proposition, and there’s no way it can be accepted.
The Japanese killed many Chinese people? I don’t think so. John Rabe sent a letter of appreciation to the commander of Japanese army on Dec. 14 1937. This is the letter.
「Dear Sirs. We express our appreciation to your artillery’s praiseworthy act of having not attacked the safety zone and for becoming able to communicate with you (commander Matsui) about the future plan for supporting Chinese citizens in the same area. 」 (Stenography No.210).
@Teh(Part2)Monition should be made here, however, that the Chinese themselves are not altogether exonerated of depredations, at least to some extent, before the entry of the Japanese. During the last few days some violations of people and property were undoubtedly committed by them. Chinese soldiers in their mad rush to discard their military uniforms and put on civilian clothes, in a number of incidents, killed civilians to obtain their clothing.
Firstly, you are probably correct in saying that some Chinese soldiers looted or violated people during the retreat. In times of chaos, shit happens. And killing civilians for civie clothes? Survival instincts.
Just because a few people did wrong does not mean that the nation they are from is evil.
And explain HOW the massacre was caused by China when JAPAN invaded and massacred the Chinese?
@TehPonynaut (Part1)Around December 10, which date was Japanese surrounded the Nanking city, the city was completely fallen into a state of anarchy by Chinese soldiers. The Chinese soldiers in holy terror came to be out of control and began looting. James Espy, the vice American Council at Nanking, reported to the American Embassy at Hankow concerning the aspect of the city right before the fall of Nanking as follows；
@TehPonynaut (Part2)Monition should be made here, however, that the Chinese themselves are not altogether exonerated of depredations, at least to some extent, before the entry of the Japanese. During the last few days some violations of people and property were undoubtedly committed by them. Chinese soldiers in their mad rush to discard their military uniforms and put on civilian clothes, in a number of incidents, killed civilians to obtain their clothing.
@TehPonynaut （Part3) Before Japan entered to the Nanking city, many Nanking civilians were killed by Chin ese military. Chinese people are always barking lies like dogs. Tell the truth; what Chinese people said about the Nanking Massacre does not have any conclusive evidence. They believe that telling lies 100 times, this could have lead to becoming true story from the lies. The Chinese have appealed the Nanking Massacre was caused by Japanese even people don’t have any witnesses about that.
CCP brainwashed it's own people by teaching Anti -Japanese education
presenting it's people bunch of fabricated fake photos of massacres, to make them believe and force it's people to deal with it's low wage labor system.
That is how Japan apologized and to many countries in Asia only not to China.
WAKE UP Chinese people, are you still going to get enough being a slave of a communist group like CCP?
Thanks to Mao Zedong China became a super power. Not only did he create a super power he also created China stronger! But thanks to Capitalists and Fascists, there died allot of people because of starvation and of course all this was blamed on Mao Zedong which wasn't even in charge of China by then. He also was responsible for free health care and free education when he was in power however this was switched and removed when Mao died
(Part2)→ He had to make his crime much bigger to get a passing score. → as witnesses'names appeared in them. →So, Peoples have been talking them wrong, believing the writings to be undeniable precious facts.
please watch this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Youtube[ Chuukiren : Brainwashed Japanese by The CCP. ]
(Part1)many Japanese were brainwashed by Chinese in China.
Most of witnesses written here were the detainees in China .→ He was worried about being executed .→ An officer rejected his confession for a lack of truth in it. → Then he had to write a confession of an escalated crime .→ Again the officer rejected it for a lack of truth, and repeated this process again and again .→ So,his crime escalated more and more.
Because Today, There isn't "Freedom of speech" in China. Chinese peoples can't speak Truth or inconvenient for Chinese government because they are killed by Chinese government, in the name of TERRORIST. Moreover There is left wing in Japan, Not only right wing. for example, former Korean, former Chinese and Korean is living in Japan who is using Japanese name. even We, Japanese can't find out them. Moreover, many Japanese were brainwashed by Chinese in China.
You must exhibit Evidence of nanking massacre, true photo & true film & true data for japan if You insist Nanking massacre. Incidentally, Why all photo & film of Nanking massacre & Unit731 which are FAKE?
There is a lot of Photo & Film of peaceful Nanking in Japan. Moreover, Many former Japanese soldier in Nanking who deny Nanking massacre. Why you have complete disregard for their Testimony ? if you make a point of testimony ? なぜ南京大虐殺は捏造されたのか? watch?v=iPhyKUmxwm0
Sorry kaito8209 but everyone knows the Nanking massacre is fact and really happened.Even japanese soldiers who took part admit it.The only people who don't believe it are the japanese public.The German public has accepted what the Nazis did but the Japanese are still in denial.
If Japanese guy who is disguised in woman's clothes.→most of the westernized world believe that this guy is woman.→ Japanese said " This person is male NOT female."→ You say "Am I suppose to go along with 2% of the world, or 98% of the world? I'll stick with the 98%. I had enough of you Japs lie.”→ However, This Japanese guy and his family know that He is male.
It was clearly proved by their testimonies at the IMTFE that no committee members had witnessed 'illegal murders by Japanese soldiers' at all. O. Wilson, who made many testimonies as to atrocities, did admit that all of his testimonies were hearsay. Magee, who lived with Bates and worked for the Safety Zone Committee, testified that he had just eye-witnessed only one case.
It was clearly proved by their testimonies at the IMTFE that no committee members had witnessed 'illegal murders by Japanese soldiers' at all. O. Wilson, who made many testimonies as to atrocities, did admit that all of his testimonies were hearsay. Magee, who lived with Bates and worked for the Safety Zone Committee, testified that he had just eye-witnessed only one case.
Please watch this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Yahoo![ The Alleged 'Nanking Massacre' 再審「南京大虐殺」 ]
(Part2)Monition should be made here, however, that the Chinese themselves are not altogether exonerated of depredations, at least to some extent, before the entry of the Japanese. During the last few days some violations of people and property were undoubtedly committed by them. Chinese soldiers in their mad rush to discard their military uniforms and put on civilian clothes, in a number of incidents, killed civilians to obtain their clothing.
(Part1)Around December 10, which date was Japanese surrounded the Nanking city, the city was completely fallen into a state of anarchy by Chinese soldiers. The Chinese soldiers in holy terror came to be out of control and began looting. James Espy, the vice American Council at Nanking, reported to the American Embassy at Hankow concerning the aspect of the city right before the fall of Nanking as follows :
me too but i think some information was exagerated, which is why japanese extreme right wingers completely deny it existed. it's sad because it's almost like they're claiming they never killed people in World War 2, lol. dunno...
【Part1】no Japanese high officials had ever become aware of the 'Nanking Massacre'.In those days Japan had no motive for conducting the mass killing of the Chinese citizens. In Germany, the holocaust, which might be frequently compared with the so-called 'Nanking Massacre' recently, was driven from a 'dominant motive' under the 'policy for extermination of Jewish people'.
【Part2】If the 'Nanking Massacre, had actually existed, there might have been some motivation. Indeed it was an argument of motivation that the Prosecution never tried to dispute so far. The Japanese had no 'policy to exterminate the Chinese'. The Prosecution explained that the motive was to threaten Chinese people. But no evidences were shown to prove it.
【Part3】On the contrary, Japan had a motive to avoid illegal actions. In those days Japan, running short in natural resources, entirely relied on the U.S. and Europe for the import of munitions and fuel, actually 65% of the import was from the U.S. and Europe. The embargo from the U.S. was barely avoided at the close of the Manchurian Incident, but at the start of the China Incident,
【Part4】the U.S. government began to think of drastic economic sanctions against Japan. In this situation, if the Japanese Army had constituted an infringement of international humanitarian laws in the manner of repeatedly committing atrocities to citizens and POWs, westerners would have been critical and the U.S. and Europe would have started economic sanctions against Japan accordingly.
【Part5】The fatal damage to Japan would have been inevitable. Having been well aware of these circumstances, the Japanese government had to absolutely avoid unnecessary and unlawful acts.
If the massacre of 300,000 persons had been planned, systematic planning procedures would have been necessary. If so, there must have been many official documents regarding mobilization plans through operation plans.
(Part1)The city of Nanking then was a castle city, surrounded by the rampart of 12 meters high, and of 6 to 12 meters thick, and occupied the total area of about 35 square kilometers. On November 14 and 15, the KMT held an opinion conference and discussed whether they should defend the city, or abandon the city and fight in another place. At the conference, the majority expressed their opinions to abandon the city.
(Part2)Von Falkenhausen, the chief of the Military Advising Group of Germany, agreed to their opinions. But, Chiang Kai-Shek insisted on defending the city. Chiang Kai-Shek appointed Tang Sheng-zhi as the commander-in-chief of the Nanking Garrison (Nanking Defense Force), and ordered him to reinforce the wall and destroy citizen's properties outside the wall as the Chinese traditional tactics of the 'Scorched-earth policy'（堅壁清野作戦）,
(Part3) not letting the Japanese Army take advantage of them.
On December 9, at noon, the Japanese Army scattered 'Bills advising surrender of the Chinese Army' from the plane in order to avoid unnecessary victims.From the Japanese historical point of view, when Japanese fought against enemy, they decided a battle area for war, which was called 合戦 in Japanese. Japanese samurai (warriors) always avoided that embroil innocent citizens in their war.
（Part4） On the other hand, we should focus our attentions to the peculiar war culture of China, the so-called Slaughtering the castle（屠城.） 'What 'Slaughtering the castle' means is that 'at the time when the castle falls after having resisted following the enemy's advice for surrender, not only the warriors but also every citizen will be exterminated. While the Prosecution's Chinese witnesses have never eye-witnessed the massacre,
Am I right in saying, this film looks incredible. I have yet to see it.. but why has the film got so little attention. I can't find any reviews from any well-known critics... can't someone link me to one, I'd like to know from a professional critics POV.
How often would you get the opportunity to watch a great movie that no-one you know has seen or even heard of? I find this appealing, and adds to the charm and mistique of the film.
Just because a movie is not mainstream or has not been critiqued by any well known critics, does not mean it is not a brilliant movie to watch. This movie has passed well below the radar of the industry elite, but of those individuals who have had the rare opportunity of viewing this film, I have heard nothing but positive reviews.
The reason the movie is realistic is because it details a relationship between parties from opposite sides of the conflict. Movies that show such relationships (and it doesn't have to be romantic) are more realistic than movies that don't, since there are always two sides to every story. The movie illustrates the cost of war to people on both sides of a given conflict
Also realistic is the fact that the actual decisions by the Japanese general who becomes responsible for the death of thousands are also justified in practical terms, not in any sadistic sense (though the individual soldiers' actions vary in cruelty).
The film illustrates the nature of violent conflict and is worth watching purely for comparison to any of the world's hot spots of violence today.
The unequivocal truth is that not a single lesson has been learnt from these horrific conflicts and acts. I don't doubt for a single moment that the Chinese would have behaved just as ruthlessly as the Japanese were the roles reversed (especially given their record after 1937, considering that it was this set of events that led to the rise of Mao Tse-tung, the CCP, and the China/Taiwan separation).
In my view, a lot of the organised violence occurs in this world purely because of the fondness of humans to ally themselves with monolithic institutions in the form of religion and government. Everyone is either being loyal or following orders or fighting for a cause. This allows one to easily disawow individual responsibility.
It is far more likely that two populations making collective judgements would commit gross and systematic acts of violence, than would individual members of the same populations making isolated judgements, against each other. As long as people are not taught that individuality should be more valued than anything else and that each action performed requires careful thought, this collective sheep-like behaviour will only lead to further destruction.
This has been flagged as spam show
China doesn't have any conclusive evidence about the Nanking Massacre. However, they have appealed the massacre was true story. Even the Chinese historians, they could not prove the stupid false story to Americans.
In fact, the Nanking population increased to 277,000 from 200,000. Also all of the Nanking Massacre pictures were fabricated by Chinese government. Moreover, well-known witnesses about it admitted their stories were hearsay.
undertakerRach 1 week ago
can anybody help me finding this movie?
MrCrynickYT 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Nanking Massacre was a false story, which was created by KMT.
The massacre did not have any witnesses, and the population was increased in 1938. Moreover, Chinese government edited, created, and trimmed 143 pictures in the Nanking Massacre Museum.
They wish the massacre was a true story because China has lot of human right problems. While Chinese people are accusing Japan over the massacre, Chinese dictatorial regime must be safe.
undertakerRach 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WIKILEAKS: Al Qaeda to unleash 'nuclear hellstorm' if Osama killed...
news. ninemsn. com.au/world/8241119/capturing-bin-laden-would-unleash-hell
WWIII
USFullOfLies 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
U.S. 4-star General Wesley Clark (Ret.), explains that the Bush Administration planned to take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran (2007 upto 2012)
/watch?v=lpBAC9dPr-o
"Japan’s government, threatened with more HAARP attacks, pays 60 trillion yen to Feds"
eclinik. wordpress. com/vital-issues/ben-fulford/japan%E2%80%99s-government-threatened-with-more-haarp-attacks-pays-60-trillion-yen-to-feds/
USFullOfLies 9 months ago
Isn't the Soldier at 5:41 the same guy who played in the Kung Fu Kids movies too as he was a child?
NoOida 9 months ago
Fucking japa ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhj
buddha24rocks 1 year ago
Comment removed
FallenAngel2611992 1 year ago
@FallenAngel2611992
Who is Chian? How can we help him/her?
Learn to spell, dumpass.
TehPonynaut 9 months ago
Nanking was terrible, but so was this clip.
drewskione 1 year ago
Nowadays people can reseach many mummies which was find in Egypt. Many mummies was buried almost 5000 years ago. However, we can find what the cause of dead of them, or what did they eat before they died, and so on. The so called Nanking Masacre was occured almost 70 years ago. China can find the details from the dead bodies. Why they don't want to reserch about the massacre? Why they could not find any conclusive evidence about that?
undertakerRach 1 year ago
@undertakerRach Sight... revisionists: always looking for their most convenient "thruth". -_-zzz
makokun9 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@makokun9 (Part1)Even in the Nanjing Incident Recent Research, Chinese historians and communists could not prove the Nanking Massacre. They are still trying showing many fabricated pictures, fake videos which were filmed movie producers, and telling a Chinese victim’s story which was from different areas and different times. IT’s a crazy, illogical proposition, and there’s no way it can be accepted.
undertakerRach 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@makokun9 (Part2)Even Chinese historians are critical situation, how can you explain about the Nanking Massacre with conclusive evidence?
undertakerRach 11 months ago
The Japanese killed many Chinese people? I don’t think so. John Rabe sent a letter of appreciation to the commander of Japanese army on Dec. 14 1937. This is the letter.
「Dear Sirs. We express our appreciation to your artillery’s praiseworthy act of having not attacked the safety zone and for becoming able to communicate with you (commander Matsui) about the future plan for supporting Chinese citizens in the same area. 」 (Stenography No.210).
The Massacre was realy occured?
undertakerRach 1 year ago
@undertakerRach
I think archeologists have found thousands of skulls and bones in large pits to prove this.
MirageBistro 1 year ago
@undertakerRach
That was basically saying, "Thank you for not fucking us over today. Please don't fuck us over when I blink."
Do you know what blatant butt kissing is?
Holocaust and Rape of Nanjing denial for the lose.
TehPonynaut 9 months ago
Comment removed
undertakerRach 8 months ago
@Teh(Part2)Monition should be made here, however, that the Chinese themselves are not altogether exonerated of depredations, at least to some extent, before the entry of the Japanese. During the last few days some violations of people and property were undoubtedly committed by them. Chinese soldiers in their mad rush to discard their military uniforms and put on civilian clothes, in a number of incidents, killed civilians to obtain their clothing.
The Nanking Massacre was caused by China!
undertakerRach 8 months ago
@undertakerRach
"The Nanking Massacre was caused by China!"
WHAT
Firstly, you are probably correct in saying that some Chinese soldiers looted or violated people during the retreat. In times of chaos, shit happens. And killing civilians for civie clothes? Survival instincts.
Just because a few people did wrong does not mean that the nation they are from is evil.
And explain HOW the massacre was caused by China when JAPAN invaded and massacred the Chinese?
TehPonynaut 7 months ago
@TehPonynaut (Part1)Around December 10, which date was Japanese surrounded the Nanking city, the city was completely fallen into a state of anarchy by Chinese soldiers. The Chinese soldiers in holy terror came to be out of control and began looting. James Espy, the vice American Council at Nanking, reported to the American Embassy at Hankow concerning the aspect of the city right before the fall of Nanking as follows；
undertakerRach 7 months ago
@TehPonynaut (Part2)Monition should be made here, however, that the Chinese themselves are not altogether exonerated of depredations, at least to some extent, before the entry of the Japanese. During the last few days some violations of people and property were undoubtedly committed by them. Chinese soldiers in their mad rush to discard their military uniforms and put on civilian clothes, in a number of incidents, killed civilians to obtain their clothing.
undertakerRach 7 months ago
@TehPonynaut （Part3) Before Japan entered to the Nanking city, many Nanking civilians were killed by Chin ese military. Chinese people are always barking lies like dogs. Tell the truth; what Chinese people said about the Nanking Massacre does not have any conclusive evidence. They believe that telling lies 100 times, this could have lead to becoming true story from the lies. The Chinese have appealed the Nanking Massacre was caused by Japanese even people don’t have any witnesses about that.
undertakerRach 7 months ago
@undertakerRach I think there is a German diplomat that disagrees with you. Remember Germany was an ally of Imperial Japan.
fee1776 1 month ago
@fee1776 You means John Rabe? His story has been refuted by historians. His diary was untrustworthy.
undertakerRach 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CCP brainwashed it's own people by teaching Anti -Japanese education
presenting it's people bunch of fabricated fake photos of massacres, to make them believe and force it's people to deal with it's low wage labor system.
That is how Japan apologized and to many countries in Asia only not to China.
WAKE UP Chinese people, are you still going to get enough being a slave of a communist group like CCP?
watch:
watch?v=WEH3FRaK2k0&feature=gr-ec_index
watch?v=aefFXZhOWBQ
watch?v=VvFk2fPHHnk
USFullOfLies 1 year ago
Thanks to Mao Zedong China became a super power. Not only did he create a super power he also created China stronger! But thanks to Capitalists and Fascists, there died allot of people because of starvation and of course all this was blamed on Mao Zedong which wasn't even in charge of China by then. He also was responsible for free health care and free education when he was in power however this was switched and removed when Mao died
SMGJohn 1 year ago
poor children,pooor people
The4368 1 year ago
Why did the soldiers spare the women? She was Japanese, from tokyo?
Hardrada88 1 year ago
Chinkinese get owned much?
ShinnAsukaGSD 1 year ago
kaito8209 thx for this useful information i appreciate it thx
8000jk 1 year ago
Why all photo & film is FAKE??
Please watch this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
youtube[ Photos of Nanking(Nanjing)Massacre/Vierify evidence photo ]
youtube[ THE FAKE OF NANKING 1 ]
Youtube[ Anti Japanese Education in China 中国人問題 ]
youtube[ 第二次上海事変における中国人による日本人捕虜の残虐処刑 (1996 CNN) ]
kaito8209 1 year ago
@kaito8209 kaito8209 thx for this useful information i appreciate it thx
8000jk 1 year ago
@8000jk
(Part2)→ He had to make his crime much bigger to get a passing score. → as witnesses'names appeared in them. →So, Peoples have been talking them wrong, believing the writings to be undeniable precious facts.
please watch this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Youtube[ Chuukiren : Brainwashed Japanese by The CCP. ]
watch?v=rJ8tb7NTvzY
kaito8209 1 year ago
@8000jk
【The detail process of the brainwashing】
(Part1)many Japanese were brainwashed by Chinese in China.
Most of witnesses written here were the detainees in China .→ He was worried about being executed .→ An officer rejected his confession for a lack of truth in it. → Then he had to write a confession of an escalated crime .→ Again the officer rejected it for a lack of truth, and repeated this process again and again .→ So,his crime escalated more and more.
kaito8209 1 year ago
Testimony is very slippery.
Because Today, There isn't "Freedom of speech" in China. Chinese peoples can't speak Truth or inconvenient for Chinese government because they are killed by Chinese government, in the name of TERRORIST. Moreover There is left wing in Japan, Not only right wing. for example, former Korean, former Chinese and Korean is living in Japan who is using Japanese name. even We, Japanese can't find out them. Moreover, many Japanese were brainwashed by Chinese in China.
kaito8209 1 year ago
@8000jk
You must exhibit Evidence of nanking massacre, true photo & true film & true data for japan if You insist Nanking massacre. Incidentally, Why all photo & film of Nanking massacre & Unit731 which are FAKE?
There is a lot of Photo & Film of peaceful Nanking in Japan. Moreover, Many former Japanese soldier in Nanking who deny Nanking massacre. Why you have complete disregard for their Testimony ? if you make a point of testimony ? なぜ南京大虐殺は捏造されたのか? watch?v=iPhyKUmxwm0
kaito8209 1 year ago
Nanking Massacre is FAKE!!! Japan didn't civilian massacre.
true photo & true film of Nanking is this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Youtube[ OpRxm_vYMog ]
Youtube[ The Fake of Nanking Massacre-2 ]
Youtube[ The Fake of Nanking Massacre-3 Population ]
Youtube[ The Fake of Nanking Massacre-4 Eyewitnesses ]
youtube[ Precious film of soon after the Fall of Nanking (1/6)sub ]
kaito8209 1 year ago
@kaito8209
Sorry kaito8209 but everyone knows the Nanking massacre is fact and really happened.Even japanese soldiers who took part admit it.The only people who don't believe it are the japanese public.The German public has accepted what the Nazis did but the Japanese are still in denial.
zerohero99 1 year ago
@zerohero99
Why Japan got a testimonial from The Safety Zone Committee in Nanking? if Nanking massacre happened?
Please watch this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
youtube[ Rabe's Grateful Letter Japan didn't attack on SafetyZone ]
watch?v=FUuVI9D4Ssk
kaito8209 1 year ago
@zerohero99
Why all photos & film of Nanking massacre which are FAKE? if Nanking massacre happened?
Where did it go to Chinese & American Cameraman at that time?
Why population of Nanking which increased? if Nanking massacre happened?
Where did it go to Chinese dead bodies of 300,000 peoples ?
kaito8209 1 year ago
@zerohero99
Your logic is the same this.
If Japanese guy who is disguised in woman's clothes.→most of the westernized world believe that this guy is woman.→ Japanese said " This person is male NOT female."→ You say "Am I suppose to go along with 2% of the world, or 98% of the world? I'll stick with the 98%. I had enough of you Japs lie.”→ However, This Japanese guy and his family know that He is male.
Do you judge the truth from decision by majority?
kaito8209 1 year ago
@kaito8209 No I judge the truth of Nanking massacre from
1. Japanese soldiers who confess to the world what they did
2.German officials who were in Nanking and even complained to Hitler about the civilians being massacred
3.Film evidence
4.Photographic evidence
5.Foreign officials and embassies in Nanking
You are wrong but cannot admit it.
zerohero99 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zerohero99
true photo & true film of Nanking massacre which are this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
[ Precious film of soon after the Fall of Nanking (1/6)sub ]
watch?v=xkkcQR50ej4
[The Fake of Nanking Massacre（English and Japanese）]
watch?v=VvFk2fPHHnk
kaito8209 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zerohero99
true photo & true film of Nanking massacre which are this.This is Fact. Japan didn't nonresistant civilians massacre.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
[ Precious film of soon after the Fall of Nanking (1/6)sub ]
watch?v=xkkcQR50ej4
[The Fake of Nanking Massacre（English and Japanese）]
watch?v=VvFk2fPHHnk
kaito8209 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zerohero99
It was clearly proved by their testimonies at the IMTFE that no committee members had witnessed 'illegal murders by Japanese soldiers' at all. O. Wilson, who made many testimonies as to atrocities, did admit that all of his testimonies were hearsay. Magee, who lived with Bates and worked for the Safety Zone Committee, testified that he had just eye-witnessed only one case.
kaito8209 1 year ago
@zerohero99
True photo & True film of Nanking massacre which are this. This is Fact.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
[ Precious film of soon after the Fall of Nanking (1/6)sub ]
watch?v=xkkcQR50ej4
[The Fake of Nanking Massacre（English and Japanese）]
watch?v=VvFk2fPHHnk
kaito8209 1 year ago
@zerohero99
It was clearly proved by their testimonies at the IMTFE that no committee members had witnessed 'illegal murders by Japanese soldiers' at all. O. Wilson, who made many testimonies as to atrocities, did admit that all of his testimonies were hearsay. Magee, who lived with Bates and worked for the Safety Zone Committee, testified that he had just eye-witnessed only one case.
Please watch this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Yahoo![ The Alleged 'Nanking Massacre' 再審「南京大虐殺」 ]
kaito8209 1 year ago
GOOD FUCKING GAWD the japs did not realize they are killing their own fucking race man =.= stupid japs...
Japs=Chinese duh even the japs language has like over 60% matching chinese langauge fuck that emporor!
BobBlobOfFancyPants 1 year ago
(Part2)Monition should be made here, however, that the Chinese themselves are not altogether exonerated of depredations, at least to some extent, before the entry of the Japanese. During the last few days some violations of people and property were undoubtedly committed by them. Chinese soldiers in their mad rush to discard their military uniforms and put on civilian clothes, in a number of incidents, killed civilians to obtain their clothing.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
(Part1)Around December 10, which date was Japanese surrounded the Nanking city, the city was completely fallen into a state of anarchy by Chinese soldiers. The Chinese soldiers in holy terror came to be out of control and began looting. James Espy, the vice American Council at Nanking, reported to the American Embassy at Hankow concerning the aspect of the city right before the fall of Nanking as follows :
undertakerRach 1 year ago
me too but i think some information was exagerated, which is why japanese extreme right wingers completely deny it existed. it's sad because it's almost like they're claiming they never killed people in World War 2, lol. dunno...
your opinion?
shizznah 1 year ago
@shizznah
【Part1】no Japanese high officials had ever become aware of the 'Nanking Massacre'.In those days Japan had no motive for conducting the mass killing of the Chinese citizens. In Germany, the holocaust, which might be frequently compared with the so-called 'Nanking Massacre' recently, was driven from a 'dominant motive' under the 'policy for extermination of Jewish people'.
kaito8209 1 year ago
@shizznah
【Part2】If the 'Nanking Massacre, had actually existed, there might have been some motivation. Indeed it was an argument of motivation that the Prosecution never tried to dispute so far. The Japanese had no 'policy to exterminate the Chinese'. The Prosecution explained that the motive was to threaten Chinese people. But no evidences were shown to prove it.
kaito8209 1 year ago
@shizznah
【Part3】On the contrary, Japan had a motive to avoid illegal actions. In those days Japan, running short in natural resources, entirely relied on the U.S. and Europe for the import of munitions and fuel, actually 65% of the import was from the U.S. and Europe. The embargo from the U.S. was barely avoided at the close of the Manchurian Incident, but at the start of the China Incident,
kaito8209 1 year ago
@shizznah
【Part4】the U.S. government began to think of drastic economic sanctions against Japan. In this situation, if the Japanese Army had constituted an infringement of international humanitarian laws in the manner of repeatedly committing atrocities to citizens and POWs, westerners would have been critical and the U.S. and Europe would have started economic sanctions against Japan accordingly.
kaito8209 1 year ago
@shizznah
【Part5】The fatal damage to Japan would have been inevitable. Having been well aware of these circumstances, the Japanese government had to absolutely avoid unnecessary and unlawful acts.
If the massacre of 300,000 persons had been planned, systematic planning procedures would have been necessary. If so, there must have been many official documents regarding mobilization plans through operation plans.
kaito8209 1 year ago
@shizznah
【Part6】However, no such documents were presented as evidence.
Please watch this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
yahoo![ The Alleged ‘Nanking Massacre’再審「南京大虐殺」 ]
kaito8209 1 year ago
i feel sorry for the chinese civilians
8000jk 1 year ago
@8000jk
(Part1)The city of Nanking then was a castle city, surrounded by the rampart of 12 meters high, and of 6 to 12 meters thick, and occupied the total area of about 35 square kilometers. On November 14 and 15, the KMT held an opinion conference and discussed whether they should defend the city, or abandon the city and fight in another place. At the conference, the majority expressed their opinions to abandon the city.
kaito8209 1 year ago
@8000jk
(Part2)Von Falkenhausen, the chief of the Military Advising Group of Germany, agreed to their opinions. But, Chiang Kai-Shek insisted on defending the city. Chiang Kai-Shek appointed Tang Sheng-zhi as the commander-in-chief of the Nanking Garrison (Nanking Defense Force), and ordered him to reinforce the wall and destroy citizen's properties outside the wall as the Chinese traditional tactics of the 'Scorched-earth policy'（堅壁清野作戦）,
kaito8209 1 year ago
@8000jk
(Part3) not letting the Japanese Army take advantage of them.
On December 9, at noon, the Japanese Army scattered 'Bills advising surrender of the Chinese Army' from the plane in order to avoid unnecessary victims.From the Japanese historical point of view, when Japanese fought against enemy, they decided a battle area for war, which was called 合戦 in Japanese. Japanese samurai (warriors) always avoided that embroil innocent citizens in their war.
kaito8209 1 year ago
@8000jk
（Part4） On the other hand, we should focus our attentions to the peculiar war culture of China, the so-called Slaughtering the castle（屠城.） 'What 'Slaughtering the castle' means is that 'at the time when the castle falls after having resisted following the enemy's advice for surrender, not only the warriors but also every citizen will be exterminated. While the Prosecution's Chinese witnesses have never eye-witnessed the massacre,
kaito8209 1 year ago
@8000jk
（Part5）the reason why they have used to testify the massacre as if they have actually eye-witnessed it, is due to the social background that
they had been impressed on their mind with the historical view originated in such peculiar war culture of China.
Please watch this.
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
yahoo![ The Alleged 'Nanking Massacre' 再審「南京大虐殺」 ]
kaito8209 1 year ago
try to see " the city of life and death" movie
Gab1n0III 2 years ago
Am I right in saying, this film looks incredible. I have yet to see it.. but why has the film got so little attention. I can't find any reviews from any well-known critics... can't someone link me to one, I'd like to know from a professional critics POV.
Garjun 2 years ago
How often would you get the opportunity to watch a great movie that no-one you know has seen or even heard of? I find this appealing, and adds to the charm and mistique of the film.
kingobnoxious 2 years ago
Just because a movie is not mainstream or has not been critiqued by any well known critics, does not mean it is not a brilliant movie to watch. This movie has passed well below the radar of the industry elite, but of those individuals who have had the rare opportunity of viewing this film, I have heard nothing but positive reviews.
kingobnoxious 2 years ago 2
The reason the movie is realistic is because it details a relationship between parties from opposite sides of the conflict. Movies that show such relationships (and it doesn't have to be romantic) are more realistic than movies that don't, since there are always two sides to every story. The movie illustrates the cost of war to people on both sides of a given conflict
kingobnoxious 2 years ago 2
Also realistic is the fact that the actual decisions by the Japanese general who becomes responsible for the death of thousands are also justified in practical terms, not in any sadistic sense (though the individual soldiers' actions vary in cruelty).
The film illustrates the nature of violent conflict and is worth watching purely for comparison to any of the world's hot spots of violence today.
kingobnoxious 2 years ago
The unequivocal truth is that not a single lesson has been learnt from these horrific conflicts and acts. I don't doubt for a single moment that the Chinese would have behaved just as ruthlessly as the Japanese were the roles reversed (especially given their record after 1937, considering that it was this set of events that led to the rise of Mao Tse-tung, the CCP, and the China/Taiwan separation).
kingobnoxious 2 years ago
i totally agree. well said.
shizznah 1 year ago
In my view, a lot of the organised violence occurs in this world purely because of the fondness of humans to ally themselves with monolithic institutions in the form of religion and government. Everyone is either being loyal or following orders or fighting for a cause. This allows one to easily disawow individual responsibility.
kingobnoxious 2 years ago
It is far more likely that two populations making collective judgements would commit gross and systematic acts of violence, than would individual members of the same populations making isolated judgements, against each other. As long as people are not taught that individuality should be more valued than anything else and that each action performed requires careful thought, this collective sheep-like behaviour will only lead to further destruction.
kingobnoxious 2 years ago