His Word also mentions witches, wizards, necromancers, giants, satyrs, cockatrices and dragons. Not exactly the kind of book you want to draw your scientific evidence from.
please go to the original word in hebrew plz translation could be weak. That does not mean it is scintific mistake. in arabic translation it is translated as the wild cow which make more sense. the other point that is a SYMBOLIC DISCRIPTION NOT LITERAL OR BIOLOGY DISCRIPTION.
Great job! many may try to challange the bible, but it won't work, it is a book of fact both historically and scientifically! Translators were long uncertain as to what animal was meant. The Greek Septuagint rendered re’em′ with the sense ‘of one horn,’ or unicorn. The Latin Vulgate often translates it as “rhinoceros.” Other versions use ‘wild ox,’ ‘wild beasts,’ or ‘buffalo.’ Robert Young simply transliterates the Hebrew into English as “Reem,” basically leaving the reader in the dark.
You make well be right about this but people certainly did use the word unicorn in the mythical sense when the KJV was written as well, there are 100s of examples of early Christian art with horse-like unicorns.
@YesIamJames that doesnt mean they understood what it was refering to when originaly written. The People in Europe probably had never seen a rihno and therefore just made pictures of horses which were common with a horn added.
@nate1454dog of course,and the unicorn myth certainly is based on a real animal just as the cyclops myth came from the discovery of elephant skulls. Maybe the original bible was referring to rhinos or another animal but the claim made in the video that people didn't use the word unicorn to refer to horned horses back then is false.
Brilliant research. Those who don't like the explanation are just obviously obtuse, ignorant individuals whose motto is "do not confuse me with facts as my mind is already made up" Your research is terrific and I congratulate you on your integrity. All those scoffers/athiests will one dreadful day, kneel before Almighty God and declare that Jesus Christ is King of Kings and Lord of Lords! Amen.
@MrTruthhurts777 I really do like this video and you're right about the research, very well done. But please explain to me how the explanation of the word unicorn in the King James Bible substantiates God's existence? I'm missing that connection in your comment.
"says absolutely nothing about blah blah blah, etc." Okay NOW the Christians are going to quibble about what the Bible actually "says and means", because something written there was "misinterpreted" or "makes them look stupid"? well, it's a little fucking late for that. What else shouldn't be taken literally as it is read? "doesn't make since to apply modern definition to the KJV Bible. That's illogical". How bout applying MODERN SCIENCE to the Bible? Also illogical BECAUSE of the bible.
God is a God of creation and you just like everybody else is the created you not going to know everything about your heaven father your mind couldn't hold the knowledge or the understanding but let me ask you this? why right now in this day in age are the prophecy of everything Yeshua said coming to pass. Baltimore city had an earthquake and we are on the eastern sea board we don't even get Earthquake. brother get your fact coming correct
Even if I agree for the sake of argument that its actually talking about Rhinoceros then why on earth did the bible translators use the word Unicorn instead of Rhinoceros?
Yeah I know you don't think properly do ya! haaaaaahahahahahaha The Bible talks about Unicorns not Rhinoceros you guys are so stupid and such fools im glad I can think for myself haaaaahahahahahaha LOOOL!!!!!!!!!!! yeaahhhhh LOOL!!!!!!!! 'Unicorns' - haaaahahahahaha
I look like the scriptures in unicorn video. I like how established your point. What a video for Exodus cry? Or Peoria resucue mission or a documterary of praying meetings all across Peoria.
Why Believe? ... I totally believe it is possible for a single or double horned horse to exist aswell. After seeing the Amazing Wonders from deep below the ocean... the aliens of the deep --- ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE. If ever someone wanted to believe in God, look not to just the Heavens, but to the deep ocean world below. Amazing that we can explore the farthest reaches of space but it is so hard to explore the depths of our own planet, i wonder why?
@NathanH83 How about why animals are so different in Australia- using the Bible.. There is no platypus etc... anywhere but there. Sounds crazy- but I've always wondered about this one.
@iclandgirl The ocean in between Asia and Australia is very shallow. Kent Hovind suggests that after the flood there was a kind of Ice Age and the water was lower, and the two continents were connected. The animals native to Australia migrated there before the water rose.
why is it so hard to believe in a horse with a horn on it's head? is seen animals hith horns on their head all over... deer, antelope, goats, moose.. etc.
@NathanH83 Okay.... I will admit i was being foolish and not putting too much into your video about unicorns. Come on, you mention the subject and you are already thinking , fantasy. And I've been all over the weird parts of you tube. Just thought i stumbled into that zone again. In all Honesty, i finally Watched the video and am thankful that you were able to clear up the mysterious origins for the word Unicorn. Now I will always associate the word with Africa. -jk Word origins are the Key
Not very convincing. He needs to ignore the Latin and go back to the original Hebrew word Re'em. which was translated monoceros (unicorn) way back in 300 BC. Some believe based on context that the Re'em was a two-horned animal but there are other references where the one-horned animal makes sense.I believe that the ancient Jews knew their language better than we do, and they translated it correctly. If you throw out references to Re'em, you still have many symbolic references to one-horn.
@ephraim888 Jesus is called "the Horn (singular) of Salvation in Luke 1:69, therefore he is the unicorn of salvation, and this is why he is often pictured as a unicorn in medieval paintings. The real answer to the critics of the Bible is that he Bible refers often to mythical (symbolic) animals. How many bones of dragons have been found? BTW there have been real unicorns (goatlike animals) in Africa.
@ephraim888 If you love unicorns and want to see a beautiful video on unicorns watch "Are You a Unicorn-The Mission and Meaning of Unicorns" on Youtube.
@DifficultNerd I used The Adobe Production Premium. It includes Premiere, After Effects, Photoshop. However, I've noticed that Final Cut actually does a better job than Premiere.
Very excellent. Your point is meticulously researched and beyond refute. As a producer/editor myself, I sincerely appreciate your research and your presentation. I know this project took many days, if not weeks to complete and I am confident there are many others out there who wholly appreciate it and you.
Isaiah 34:6-7 proves the animal re'em was not a rhinoceros.
"The sword of the Lord is bathed in blood, it is covered with fat-- the blood of lambs and goats, fat from the kidneys of rams. For the Lord has a sacrifice in Bozrah and a great slaughter in Edom. And the wild oxen (unicorn) will fall with them, the bull calves and the great bulls. Their land will be drenched with blood, and the dust will be soaked with fat."
This states the re'em was a kosher animal. The rhinoceros is not kosher.
@ghostmarble Hang on a second there. Just dodging in here. If we're talking about the unicorn then neither the Vulgata nor the King James version are appropriate. You should use the Greek Coiné version of the Bible, no? I mean, that's the oldest version of the Bible available.
Well that's certainly a problem. I am under the assumption the Masoretic Text is the most accurate representation of the original language despite it's date of origination.
“a little below the elephant in size, and of the appearance, color, and shape of a bull. Their strength and speed are extraordinary; they spare neither man nor wild beast... Not even when taken very young can they be rendered familiar to men and tamed. The size, shape, and appearance of their horns differ much from the horns of our oxen. These they anxiously seek after, and bind at the tips with silver, and use as cups at their most sumptuous entertainments.
@Keshawful First off I asked you the question, so referring me to a different vid tells me you don't know the answer. 2nd, Its is universally agreed that space, time and matter came into existence from literally nothing a finite time ago. Dark matter IS something and it needs an explanation itself, so, dark matter answers nothing. Sorry
@v33punk I take it you do not understand or you didnt even read the article but that is fine I will have my science and you can have your harry potter beliefs.
@Keshawful Harry Potter? Insults are a sign of ignorance. I wanted your answer, in your own words. Not some article you found that supports your pre conceived worldview.
@v33punk Important things, general things. Just because a man links you to an article posted by people who's job it is to discover reality. Does not mean it is worthy of complete dismissal.
@koreyu90 Job to discover reality? I think you are assuming that the physical world is all there is. I asked the person a metaphysical question and he gave me a material answer. thats like me asking you, "what is your favorite baseball?" team and you answer, "chocolate".
@NathanH83 Ya but this doesn't work. Because it is written in the bible that the unicorn, out of pride, refused to go onto Noahs' Ark with the rest of the aimals, and so went extinct (you see, an example of evolution at work right in the bible !).
@winzo89 Where does the Bible say that the unicorn refused to go on the ark? I read the whole book and didn't find that anywhere. Also, the whole point of this video is that "unicorn" used to be another name for the rhinoceros...a real animal.
@MrTruthhurts777 never mind. i heard it, that's all. but it is something some christians believe (or believed). after all, i heard it from a christian, when i was still a believer. at the time i felt justified, they died because they were so prideful of themselves, they died in sin. (i heard this as a child.)
Meanwhile in your article you define ox as “a domesticated bull,” and consequently claim a wild version could not exist. However the the other definition of ox is castrated adult bull. You appear to deliberately ignore this common definition. Modern bulls not castrated are dangerous. A auroch would have been terrifying. So "wild ox" is a perfectly reasonable definition of re'em. The modern definition of rhinoceros is not.
@ghostmarble Psalm 92:10 clearly says that this animal has 1 horn. Do you know of any 1 horned bulls? Also, Job 39 clearly says that this animal cannot be tamed. A wild ox may not BE tamed, but it CAN be tamed, whereas the rhinoceros cannot.
In Psalm 92:10 you once again are focusing on the Latin translation at the expense of the Hebrew. "But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of the wild ox." It is a turn of phrase modifying the singular subject, so it only makes sense to refer to the horn as singular. With regard to Job 39, an auroch can not be tamed. Only with generational breeding can it be tamed.
Nathan, look on wikipedia for Ishtar Gate. There you will see a picture of a auroch, the giantic ancestor of modern cattle. Ishtar Gate was built by Nebuchadnezzar II in 575 B.C. and contemporary with writings of the Old Testament. Aurochs stood nearly 6 feet tall. The picture you see there is very likely the re'em of the Bible. It looked very much like a "unicorn."
First you have to transulater correctly.The word means Oxen and nothing else. You should buy a strongs concordance and look for yourself. Your ignorance is showing. May the good lord bless you with wiswdom to see the truth! Have a nice day.
If you intended this video as a good faith effort to explain re'em you should say as much. Otherwise, it will become clear what your real intentions were.
Rhinoceros, as we know them, live in Africa and Asia. The Asian variety, with one horn, were absolutely unknown to the Biblical authors. All the African sub-species of rhino have two and sometimes three horns. Meanwhile the max historic range of African sub-species of rhino only extended to central and east Africa and were also very likely unknown to biblical authors. BTW, it is useless to use Latin translations of Hebrew text.
@ghostmarble The one-horned rhinoceros does not live in Israel today. But what I don't understand is what makes you so certain that the one-horned rhino didn't live in Israel (or nearby) 3,000 years ago.
@ghostmarble Nice try in shifting the burden of proof. If you assert that the one-horned rhino did not live in Israel, then the burden of proof is on you.
I'm simply reading the Bible for what it says. And according to the Bible, they knew about the one-horned rhinoceros. Since a person is innocent until otherwise proven guilty, we must assume they are telling the truth, unless there is evidence proving them to be lying. But you are assuming they are guilty until otherwise proven innocent.
You can not prove a negative, and thus the burden of proof is on you since you made the claim the bible refers to rhinoceros. Rhinos around Israel went extinct during the Pleistocene. No serious biblical scholar believes re’em refers to a rhinoceros. The American Standard Version translates re’em as wild ox for lack of a better term.
@ghostmarble You cannot prove a negative? That's precisely my point. You cannot prove that the one-horned rhinoceros was unknown to biblical authors. Therefore your assertion is unprovable. When you claim you know it's true, when you really don't know, then you're lying. You even admit that rhinos lived near Israel in the past. The truth is that you don't know WHEN they lived near Israel, due to the inaccuracy of radiometric dating methods.
I guess all the other Biblical scholars who have written modern translations of Biblical text are in error as well? The truth is you have now taken a simple confusion and added another layer of confusion. The KJV was translated from the Latin Vulgate. It was a bad translation of the word from Hebrew then and now. On top of that you have added that the animal was a rhino, and it wasn't. Do the Christian world a favor and take the video down, or upload one more accurate.
@ghostmarble It's not just the KJV that says unicorn. It's also Tyndale's Bible, Wycliffe's Bible, Luther's German Bible, the Latin Vulgate, the Greek text, the Douay Rheim's Catholic Bible, Webster's Bible, and a variety of other translations. Modern Hebrew scholars claim that they don't know what the Re'em really is. Their best guess is a "wild ox" but they freely admit that they don't know that for certain.
@ghostmarble When Isaiah 34:7 in the KJV mentions unicorn there is a marginal note that says "or rhinoceros." When Job 39:9 mentions the unicorn the latin vulgate says "rinoceros." If you look up unicorn in Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary it says rhinoceros. And if you look up rhinoceros it says unicorn. If you look up unicorn in Samuel Johnson's dictionary from 1755 it mentions the one-horned rhinoceros.
The Latin Bible said rhinoceros long before the 14th century.
"The Latin Bible said rhinoceros long before the 14th century."
400 A.D., 1000 years after the Old testament was written. And again the term was not applied to what we now know as rhino's until the 14th century. I think you posted this video to make Christians look bad.
I find it amazing how the creationists cherry pick anything to fit the bible. Don't find evidence and construct a theory they instead use a very edited book written via goat herders and epileptics. Do you move closer to a person sprouting utterings from god on a bus or do you move away from them? What next talking animals, wait there is one in the bible. Mr Ed lives.
the single horned rhinoceros is found on the indian subcontinent while the double horned is found in africa - which of these rhinoceroses was known to the writers of the old testament?
Well, the word unicorn was translated wrong by the writers! the word Unicorn is: re'em: from 7214 Hebrew and chaldean Dictionary that means: A WILD MALE BULL, not a horse or such fairy tails. Unicorns only come to peoples mind when they smoke dope.
Good job with the unicon, now refute the other 30 monsters in the bible. Leviathans, those things in rev with the eyes, Behemoths, Satyrs, 7 headed dragons and all sorts of fiery serpents.
Before the English translations, starting with Tyndale, (who was burned at the stake for creating an English Bible) the Bible was legally available only to clergy in the Catholic Church and was translated into Latin. Variants occur through translation of Greek and Hebrew.
NASB translates this as the "wild ox". The King James version was not the first version in English but the most widely publicized for the masses starting in 1611. Remember that every translation must go back to the original Greek and Hebrew.
@neverfearchrisishere It's referring to the 400 year old Shakespearean era definition, as this is the word used in the KJV, and this is when the KJV was written.
Except you're relying too heavily on the Greek and Latin versions of the Bible, when the Tanakh was written in Hebrew. Rabbis tend to think it was an aurochs, and the modern semitic word "rem," which re'em comes from, means antelope.
Why Does the Bible Mention Unicorns? becouse there once was Unicorns,scripture does not lie nore had any reason to,Im shure they all are just extinct by now just as the tazmanian tiger is now,we are not finding any tazmanian tigar bones now either but we know for a fact they where here.
My son had a dream when he was 5.He says He went up 2Heaven in the arms of Jesus Christ who then put him on His horse, a beautiful white gleaming horse that had a horn on it's head. The angels all sang in the heavens "Glory to God in the highest" while he was there in the dream and then he woke up.I never told him about any white horse,let alone "unicorns" which I thought were mythical.I believe my son had a true encounter with the Living God and was shown something quite special.Time will tell.
Correct should be in PSALM 92,10 Your Horn you are uplifted like in oxen and you anoite me with oil that is to fresh and clean NOWHERE IN THIS VERSE IS UNICORN
@nicholaswright2006 In my HOLY SCRIPTURE GOD HOLY WORD i can not find word Unicorn but Rhinos and in dont use King James version Shalom Praise Glory to GOD FATHER SON HOLY SPIRIT i use HOLY SCRIPTURE with GOD HOLY NAME YHWH that is written 7000 Times
A far more accurate translation into English is the New International Version 1984 edition or the 1978 edition. It can be read free online at biblegateway com But most of you don't want the truth anyway, so spare your ignorant remarks. If you are arfraid to read it, don't claim to know what it says.
ignorant peoplel The KJV was intentionally mistranslated by catholicism to get you to not read the Bible. They burned William Tyndale at the stake in 1536 for translating the Bible into English out of the original Hebrew and Greek so that people could read it accurately. Then they declared the Apocrypha as part of the Bible and came up with the KJV. The KJV translated the Hebrew word RAM as unicorn because they want people to believe the priests and not the Bible.
Very reasonable. If we can have a similar video giving a coherent explanation for the immaculate conception and resurrection of Jesus, we'll really be getting somewhere.
I'm not Christian, nor do I believe in the Bible's validity, but this video is a very well executed and adeptly explained analysis of this debate which even I as an atheist can appreciate as being logical. Well done, sir.
No fossils doesn't prove no existence. Billions upon billions of creatures walked the Earth, do we find billions of fossils? Fossilisation is a very very rare occurence.
ok, you make a compelling argument for the incorrect translation of the bible. If you are correct, then why does it seem that your omnipotent god who inspired men to both write and translate "his words" is seemingly incapable of inspiring those men correctly? Wouldn't an omnipotent god be able to ensure that his own words are written down correctly? Defending yahweh's existence is the same logical fail as defending the existence of Zeus or any other of the thousands of various invented gods.
(1/6) Here are two basic assumptions: God is all-knowing, therefore, God must know more than me. Go outside and carefully do a 360 degree spin, focusing on objects in the distance. You will eventually see a limit we call the horizon, the physical end of your vision, relative to your tangent on earth.
(2/6) In the past, people, who spoke to God on a regular basis, saw this and came to conclusion, or were Told, either way it doesn't matter, that the world was flat; God allowed them to illustrate many versions of this flat earth in his and other books. You'd think with all this knowledge and omnipresence he say,
(3/6) "hey, this world you're on, tis spherical, not flat... gonna wanna redraw those illustrations. Some jerks in the future are going to point that out occasionally. As if it is some sort of indicator that I only really have a pool of knowledge that is limited by your understanding of reality and that I am nothing more than a figment, and for some of you, a voice in your head. Here to comfort your lack of understanding of the natural world and make you feel important in some way."
(4/6) But that voice in their head never said that, because, when you have a limited psychosis propagated by a culture or norm (def. religion), you like to keep your claims to what can be definitively provable by what is currently considered natural law. The problem is science, who introduces new concepts, understandings and manipulations of natural law that did not exist during or before Biblical times.
(5/6) If some desert dwelling nomad who has a 1/100000000000th the understanding of the world as I do said, “Hey you know what, we as human beings, are so small in size in comparison to the earth that the curvature of the earth is perceived, by our limited senses, as a flat plain, but we are really on an orb.”
@Ambelghan "It is he that sitteth upon the globe of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as locusts: he that stretcheth out the heavens as nothing, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in."
-Isaiah 40:22 (Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition)
It's amazing how one scripture verse refutes 6 comments.
@NathanH83 1899 rendition is amazing, how many times will you people edit, remake, reword and leave out books of the perfect all-powerful Author? Didn't know that God needed an editor, good thing Constantine did. Hey explain how all the genetic diversity that exist in humanity could come about from 2 humans? Scratch that, Adam and Eve weren't humans, Cain is the father of Humanity and he mated with... uh, something to make humans Not mentioned? Plot hole! What ever happened to Lilith?
His Word also mentions witches, wizards, necromancers, giants, satyrs, cockatrices and dragons. Not exactly the kind of book you want to draw your scientific evidence from.
gregrutz 3 days ago
please go to the original word in hebrew plz translation could be weak. That does not mean it is scintific mistake. in arabic translation it is translated as the wild cow which make more sense. the other point that is a SYMBOLIC DISCRIPTION NOT LITERAL OR BIOLOGY DISCRIPTION.
RAFLAFAMILY 5 days ago
Great job! many may try to challange the bible, but it won't work, it is a book of fact both historically and scientifically! Translators were long uncertain as to what animal was meant. The Greek Septuagint rendered re’em′ with the sense ‘of one horn,’ or unicorn. The Latin Vulgate often translates it as “rhinoceros.” Other versions use ‘wild ox,’ ‘wild beasts,’ or ‘buffalo.’ Robert Young simply transliterates the Hebrew into English as “Reem,” basically leaving the reader in the dark.
ThemintPattie 5 days ago
@ThemintPattie Does the bible say there was a global flood? Then it is wrong.
gregrutz 3 days ago
The "Rhinoceros" in the bible flies though. You left that part out.
LFCsoldier 1 week ago
Iyob (Job) in the same book says "wild ox" again 39:9
vaimy777 1 week ago
In my Hebrew version of the Scripture it says in Psalm (Tehillim) 92:10 "Wild Ox" instead of Unicorn.
vaimy777 1 week ago
You make well be right about this but people certainly did use the word unicorn in the mythical sense when the KJV was written as well, there are 100s of examples of early Christian art with horse-like unicorns.
YesIamJames 2 weeks ago
@YesIamJames that doesnt mean they understood what it was refering to when originaly written. The People in Europe probably had never seen a rihno and therefore just made pictures of horses which were common with a horn added.
nate1454dog 1 week ago
@nate1454dog of course,and the unicorn myth certainly is based on a real animal just as the cyclops myth came from the discovery of elephant skulls. Maybe the original bible was referring to rhinos or another animal but the claim made in the video that people didn't use the word unicorn to refer to horned horses back then is false.
YesIamJames 1 week ago
I use NKJV
eustacefan 2 weeks ago
Amazing, my favorite youtube video.
canadiannerd1 3 weeks ago
Brilliant research. Those who don't like the explanation are just obviously obtuse, ignorant individuals whose motto is "do not confuse me with facts as my mind is already made up" Your research is terrific and I congratulate you on your integrity. All those scoffers/athiests will one dreadful day, kneel before Almighty God and declare that Jesus Christ is King of Kings and Lord of Lords! Amen.
MrTruthhurts777 3 weeks ago
@MrTruthhurts777 I really do like this video and you're right about the research, very well done. But please explain to me how the explanation of the word unicorn in the King James Bible substantiates God's existence? I'm missing that connection in your comment.
thedaystripper 1 week ago
@thedaystripper It doesn't substantiate God's existence. The last part of my comment was just an annex, that's all.
MrTruthhurts777 1 week ago
"says absolutely nothing about blah blah blah, etc." Okay NOW the Christians are going to quibble about what the Bible actually "says and means", because something written there was "misinterpreted" or "makes them look stupid"? well, it's a little fucking late for that. What else shouldn't be taken literally as it is read? "doesn't make since to apply modern definition to the KJV Bible. That's illogical". How bout applying MODERN SCIENCE to the Bible? Also illogical BECAUSE of the bible.
AzazelZaphorOmega 3 weeks ago
go to the book of matthew and you will find it
priestk6 3 weeks ago
God is a God of creation and you just like everybody else is the created you not going to know everything about your heaven father your mind couldn't hold the knowledge or the understanding but let me ask you this? why right now in this day in age are the prophecy of everything Yeshua said coming to pass. Baltimore city had an earthquake and we are on the eastern sea board we don't even get Earthquake. brother get your fact coming correct
priestk6 3 weeks ago
@priestk6 WHERE are such specific events prophesied? BULLSHIT!!
AzazelZaphorOmega 3 weeks ago
This failed to explain where there myth of the horse came from
donnthedragon 4 weeks ago
@donnthedragon Explaining where the mythical horse unicorn came from - this was not my objective.
NathanH83 4 weeks ago 11
WOW! thank you! answered my question........awesome!.....can't say I'm not a little dissapointed.....kinda like the horse/unicorn idea.....lol....
CDWalk71 4 weeks ago
aw man...I wanted there to be real unicorns!!!
hortulanus94 1 month ago
This was very interesting! I never knew the Bible mentioned this.
Janellee43 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Even if I agree for the sake of argument that its actually talking about Rhinoceros then why on earth did the bible translators use the word Unicorn instead of Rhinoceros?
Yeah I know you don't think properly do ya! haaaaaahahahahahaha The Bible talks about Unicorns not Rhinoceros you guys are so stupid and such fools im glad I can think for myself haaaaahahahahahaha LOOOL!!!!!!!!!!! yeaahhhhh LOOL!!!!!!!! 'Unicorns' - haaaahahahahaha
ExtremeEnergyForce 1 month ago
Comment removed
ExtremeEnergyForce 1 month ago
Awesome video! Keep up the good work! God bless you.
Lukyo1984 1 month ago 5
I look like the scriptures in unicorn video. I like how established your point. What a video for Exodus cry? Or Peoria resucue mission or a documterary of praying meetings all across Peoria.
In how God answers prayer?
Bluecollar302 1 month ago
@Bluecollar302 You're from Peoria? Who are you?
NathanH83 1 month ago
Why Believe? ... I totally believe it is possible for a single or double horned horse to exist aswell. After seeing the Amazing Wonders from deep below the ocean... the aliens of the deep --- ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE. If ever someone wanted to believe in God, look not to just the Heavens, but to the deep ocean world below. Amazing that we can explore the farthest reaches of space but it is so hard to explore the depths of our own planet, i wonder why?
MrShaun42088 1 month ago
Well prepared. Easy to understand. You are a great Apologist.
Thanks
rreyesyt 1 month ago
Nate I like to see you make videos for social agencies as well that have cause more. This is cool but you can do so much more. GO for it!
Bluecollar302 1 month ago
@Bluecollar302 What do you mean by social agencies?
NathanH83 1 month ago
because I like social work.
Bluecollar302 1 month ago
@Bluecollar302 what kind of videos are you suggesting I make? send me something as an example.
NathanH83 1 month ago
@NathanH83 How about why animals are so different in Australia- using the Bible.. There is no platypus etc... anywhere but there. Sounds crazy- but I've always wondered about this one.
iclandgirl 1 month ago
@iclandgirl The ocean in between Asia and Australia is very shallow. Kent Hovind suggests that after the flood there was a kind of Ice Age and the water was lower, and the two continents were connected. The animals native to Australia migrated there before the water rose.
NathanH83 1 month ago
why is it so hard to believe in a horse with a horn on it's head? is seen animals hith horns on their head all over... deer, antelope, goats, moose.. etc.
MrShaun42088 1 month ago
@MrShaun42088 No one has ever found a fossil of a horse with a horn on it's head. Besides, did you even watch the whole video?
NathanH83 1 month ago
@NathanH83 no...i didn't watch your whole video, becuz i don't think it's so far fetched for a unicorn to have existed
MrShaun42088 1 month ago
@MrShaun42088 Well, if you watch just the first few minutes of the video, you'll find that the Bible is actually talking about a rhinoceros.
NathanH83 1 month ago
@NathanH83 Okay.... I will admit i was being foolish and not putting too much into your video about unicorns. Come on, you mention the subject and you are already thinking , fantasy. And I've been all over the weird parts of you tube. Just thought i stumbled into that zone again. In all Honesty, i finally Watched the video and am thankful that you were able to clear up the mysterious origins for the word Unicorn. Now I will always associate the word with Africa. -jk Word origins are the Key
MrShaun42088 1 month ago
unfortunately this doesn't make sense of any of the 1000+ other silly things the bible has to say, or has gotten wrong...
StubornLady 1 month ago
Not very convincing. He needs to ignore the Latin and go back to the original Hebrew word Re'em. which was translated monoceros (unicorn) way back in 300 BC. Some believe based on context that the Re'em was a two-horned animal but there are other references where the one-horned animal makes sense.I believe that the ancient Jews knew their language better than we do, and they translated it correctly. If you throw out references to Re'em, you still have many symbolic references to one-horn.
ephraim888 1 month ago
@ephraim888 Jesus is called "the Horn (singular) of Salvation in Luke 1:69, therefore he is the unicorn of salvation, and this is why he is often pictured as a unicorn in medieval paintings. The real answer to the critics of the Bible is that he Bible refers often to mythical (symbolic) animals. How many bones of dragons have been found? BTW there have been real unicorns (goatlike animals) in Africa.
ephraim888 1 month ago
@ephraim888 If you love unicorns and want to see a beautiful video on unicorns watch "Are You a Unicorn-The Mission and Meaning of Unicorns" on Youtube.
ephraim888 1 month ago
your animations are lovely - what software are you using?
DifficultNerd 1 month ago
@DifficultNerd I used The Adobe Production Premium. It includes Premiere, After Effects, Photoshop. However, I've noticed that Final Cut actually does a better job than Premiere.
NathanH83 1 month ago
And here I thought I was going to see proof that Princess Celestia is biblical.
KeshiaRambles 1 month ago
I'd say it is pretty fitting to have a mythical horse with a horn be called a unicorn as well as rhinos, since both creatures share common ancestors.
zWolf1215 1 month ago
However, the biblical unicorn was a real animal, not an imaginary creature.
The Bible refers to the unicorn in the context of familiar animals, such as peacocks,
lambs, lions, bullocks, goats, donkeys, horses, dogs, eagles, and calves (Job 39:9–12.1)
In Job 38–41, God reminded Job of the characteristics of a variety of impressive animals
He had created, showing Job that God is FAR above man in power and strength.
Mystery solved.
oztronix 2 months ago
Very excellent. Your point is meticulously researched and beyond refute. As a producer/editor myself, I sincerely appreciate your research and your presentation. I know this project took many days, if not weeks to complete and I am confident there are many others out there who wholly appreciate it and you.
targetingtruth 2 months ago
Wow, I'm really astonished by your knowledge in this (:
Keep up the good work!
Awesome editing too!
allandabid 2 months ago
Same point , what's the meaning of explaining of modern words from a 400 year period , for a book written 1700 or more ago ;)
TheAceangelos 2 months ago
I continued his discussion and got to thinking that they were actually referring to people as the unicorns
MrSunshineSOS 2 months ago
Isaiah 34:6-7 proves the animal re'em was not a rhinoceros.
"The sword of the Lord is bathed in blood, it is covered with fat-- the blood of lambs and goats, fat from the kidneys of rams. For the Lord has a sacrifice in Bozrah and a great slaughter in Edom. And the wild oxen (unicorn) will fall with them, the bull calves and the great bulls. Their land will be drenched with blood, and the dust will be soaked with fat."
This states the re'em was a kosher animal. The rhinoceros is not kosher.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
@ghostmarble Hang on a second there. Just dodging in here. If we're talking about the unicorn then neither the Vulgata nor the King James version are appropriate. You should use the Greek Coiné version of the Bible, no? I mean, that's the oldest version of the Bible available.
GaolisVideoLog 2 months ago
@GaolisVideoLog
Well that's certainly a problem. I am under the assumption the Masoretic Text is the most accurate representation of the original language despite it's date of origination.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
“a little below the elephant in size, and of the appearance, color, and shape of a bull. Their strength and speed are extraordinary; they spare neither man nor wild beast... Not even when taken very young can they be rendered familiar to men and tamed. The size, shape, and appearance of their horns differ much from the horns of our oxen. These they anxiously seek after, and bind at the tips with silver, and use as cups at their most sumptuous entertainments.
Julius Caesar describing an aurochs.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
Now explain walking on water and turning water into wine...
Keshawful 2 months ago
@Keshawful Right after you explain why there is something rather than nothing.
v33punk 2 months ago
@v33punk google what is dark energy...now your turn.
Keshawful 2 months ago
@Keshawful First off I asked you the question, so referring me to a different vid tells me you don't know the answer. 2nd, Its is universally agreed that space, time and matter came into existence from literally nothing a finite time ago. Dark matter IS something and it needs an explanation itself, so, dark matter answers nothing. Sorry
v33punk 2 months ago
@v33punk there is a really good article from NASA that will explain why there is something rather than nothing. It's called Dark Energy, Dark Matter.
Keshawful 2 months ago
@Keshawful Besides... I asked you WHY there is something rather than nothing, not HOW.
v33punk 2 months ago
@v33punk I take it you do not understand or you didnt even read the article but that is fine I will have my science and you can have your harry potter beliefs.
Keshawful 2 months ago
@Keshawful Harry Potter? Insults are a sign of ignorance. I wanted your answer, in your own words. Not some article you found that supports your pre conceived worldview.
v33punk 2 months ago
@v33punk Things are sometimes explained when great minds think alike.
koreyu90 2 months ago
@koreyu90 Which things?
v33punk 2 months ago
@v33punk Important things, general things. Just because a man links you to an article posted by people who's job it is to discover reality. Does not mean it is worthy of complete dismissal.
koreyu90 2 months ago
@koreyu90 Job to discover reality? I think you are assuming that the physical world is all there is. I asked the person a metaphysical question and he gave me a material answer. thats like me asking you, "what is your favorite baseball?" team and you answer, "chocolate".
v33punk 2 months ago
@v33punk Are you a follower of a religion? If so, which one? If I may ask.
koreyu90 2 months ago
@koreyu90 Sure you can ask! I'm a Christian.
v33punk 2 months ago
@koreyu90 Sure, I'm a Christian. Of course I don't mind you asking!
v33punk 2 months ago
@Keshawful walking on water and turning water into wine....those are called miracles.
NathanH83 2 months ago 7
@NathanH83 to each, their own....
Keshawful 2 months ago
@NathanH83 Ya but this doesn't work. Because it is written in the bible that the unicorn, out of pride, refused to go onto Noahs' Ark with the rest of the aimals, and so went extinct (you see, an example of evolution at work right in the bible !).
winzo89 4 weeks ago
@winzo89 Where does the Bible say that the unicorn refused to go on the ark? I read the whole book and didn't find that anywhere. Also, the whole point of this video is that "unicorn" used to be another name for the rhinoceros...a real animal.
swordsman468 3 weeks ago
@winzo89 Where in the bible does it say that the unicorn refused to go into the ark? Give me the exact passage please. Thanks!
MrTruthhurts777 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
winzo89 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
winzo89 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrTruthhurts777 never mind. i heard it, that's all. but it is something some christians believe (or believed). after all, i heard it from a christian, when i was still a believer. at the time i felt justified, they died because they were so prideful of themselves, they died in sin. (i heard this as a child.)
winzo89 3 weeks ago
@NathanH83 those do not require the suspension of reality, which is what a miracle is.
Denchanter357 4 weeks ago
Meanwhile in your article you define ox as “a domesticated bull,” and consequently claim a wild version could not exist. However the the other definition of ox is castrated adult bull. You appear to deliberately ignore this common definition. Modern bulls not castrated are dangerous. A auroch would have been terrifying. So "wild ox" is a perfectly reasonable definition of re'em. The modern definition of rhinoceros is not.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
@ghostmarble Psalm 92:10 clearly says that this animal has 1 horn. Do you know of any 1 horned bulls? Also, Job 39 clearly says that this animal cannot be tamed. A wild ox may not BE tamed, but it CAN be tamed, whereas the rhinoceros cannot.
NathanH83 2 months ago
@NathanH83
In Psalm 92:10 you once again are focusing on the Latin translation at the expense of the Hebrew. "But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of the wild ox." It is a turn of phrase modifying the singular subject, so it only makes sense to refer to the horn as singular. With regard to Job 39, an auroch can not be tamed. Only with generational breeding can it be tamed.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
Nathan, look on wikipedia for Ishtar Gate. There you will see a picture of a auroch, the giantic ancestor of modern cattle. Ishtar Gate was built by Nebuchadnezzar II in 575 B.C. and contemporary with writings of the Old Testament. Aurochs stood nearly 6 feet tall. The picture you see there is very likely the re'em of the Bible. It looked very much like a "unicorn."
ghostmarble 2 months ago
First you have to transulater correctly.The word means Oxen and nothing else. You should buy a strongs concordance and look for yourself. Your ignorance is showing. May the good lord bless you with wiswdom to see the truth! Have a nice day.
karyevans 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you intended this video as a good faith effort to explain re'em you should say as much. Otherwise, it will become clear what your real intentions were.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
Comment removed
ghostmarble 2 months ago
The question is, "why does the bible mention god?"
God is as real as unicorns!
bcta302 2 months ago
Rhinoceros, as we know them, live in Africa and Asia. The Asian variety, with one horn, were absolutely unknown to the Biblical authors. All the African sub-species of rhino have two and sometimes three horns. Meanwhile the max historic range of African sub-species of rhino only extended to central and east Africa and were also very likely unknown to biblical authors. BTW, it is useless to use Latin translations of Hebrew text.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
@ghostmarble The one-horned rhinoceros does not live in Israel today. But what I don't understand is what makes you so certain that the one-horned rhino didn't live in Israel (or nearby) 3,000 years ago.
NathanH83 2 months ago
@NathanH83
Since you are making the assertion that a rhinoceros species lived in Israel 3,000 years ago you need to have proof e.g. a dated fossil.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
@ghostmarble Nice try in shifting the burden of proof. If you assert that the one-horned rhino did not live in Israel, then the burden of proof is on you.
I'm simply reading the Bible for what it says. And according to the Bible, they knew about the one-horned rhinoceros. Since a person is innocent until otherwise proven guilty, we must assume they are telling the truth, unless there is evidence proving them to be lying. But you are assuming they are guilty until otherwise proven innocent.
NathanH83 2 months ago
@NathanH83
You can not prove a negative, and thus the burden of proof is on you since you made the claim the bible refers to rhinoceros. Rhinos around Israel went extinct during the Pleistocene. No serious biblical scholar believes re’em refers to a rhinoceros. The American Standard Version translates re’em as wild ox for lack of a better term.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
@ghostmarble You cannot prove a negative? That's precisely my point. You cannot prove that the one-horned rhinoceros was unknown to biblical authors. Therefore your assertion is unprovable. When you claim you know it's true, when you really don't know, then you're lying. You even admit that rhinos lived near Israel in the past. The truth is that you don't know WHEN they lived near Israel, due to the inaccuracy of radiometric dating methods.
NathanH83 2 months ago
@NathanH83
I guess all the other Biblical scholars who have written modern translations of Biblical text are in error as well? The truth is you have now taken a simple confusion and added another layer of confusion. The KJV was translated from the Latin Vulgate. It was a bad translation of the word from Hebrew then and now. On top of that you have added that the animal was a rhino, and it wasn't. Do the Christian world a favor and take the video down, or upload one more accurate.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
@ghostmarble It's not just the KJV that says unicorn. It's also Tyndale's Bible, Wycliffe's Bible, Luther's German Bible, the Latin Vulgate, the Greek text, the Douay Rheim's Catholic Bible, Webster's Bible, and a variety of other translations. Modern Hebrew scholars claim that they don't know what the Re'em really is. Their best guess is a "wild ox" but they freely admit that they don't know that for certain.
NathanH83 2 months ago
@NathanH83
Are you now arguing that it is a unicorn?
ghostmarble 2 months ago
@ghostmarble unicorn, by it's historic definition, is a one-horned rhinoceros.
NathanH83 2 months ago
@NathanH83
According to who? You? The term rhinoceros was applied to this particular animal in the 14th century A.D..
ghostmarble 2 months ago
@ghostmarble When Isaiah 34:7 in the KJV mentions unicorn there is a marginal note that says "or rhinoceros." When Job 39:9 mentions the unicorn the latin vulgate says "rinoceros." If you look up unicorn in Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary it says rhinoceros. And if you look up rhinoceros it says unicorn. If you look up unicorn in Samuel Johnson's dictionary from 1755 it mentions the one-horned rhinoceros.
The Latin Bible said rhinoceros long before the 14th century.
NathanH83 2 months ago
@NathanH83
"The Latin Bible said rhinoceros long before the 14th century."
400 A.D., 1000 years after the Old testament was written. And again the term was not applied to what we now know as rhino's until the 14th century. I think you posted this video to make Christians look bad.
ghostmarble 2 months ago
I find it amazing how the creationists cherry pick anything to fit the bible. Don't find evidence and construct a theory they instead use a very edited book written via goat herders and epileptics. Do you move closer to a person sprouting utterings from god on a bus or do you move away from them? What next talking animals, wait there is one in the bible. Mr Ed lives.
elsbymike 2 months ago
71 atheists dislike truth
KingDcome11 2 months ago
Comment removed
KingDcome11 2 months ago
the single horned rhinoceros is found on the indian subcontinent while the double horned is found in africa - which of these rhinoceroses was known to the writers of the old testament?
aden302000 2 months ago
71 people must hate facts
lostbot101 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos 2
This video just go's to show you. How many atheist do there home work befor they run there mouth.
lostbot101 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
Fact: everyone believes in God when they die
wildflower386 2 months ago
@wildflower386 That's not a fact. It's a barefaced lie.
M0rdH0rst 2 months ago
@M0rdH0rst Are you suggesting that when atheists are sent to Hell they still don't believe in God's existence?
NathanH83 2 months ago
@NathanH83 As long as he doesn't drop by to say "I am the god of hell fire..."
/watch?v=eawL6aJ2nBc
M0rdH0rst 2 months ago
Great video* well made
phirefish 2 months ago
GOD clearly states that he makes the animals ACCORDING TO THEIR KIND or family
Horses (Equidae:Horse Family) and not Bull (Bovinae:Bulls family). Evolution is a theory
Base on LIES. Evolution has no CREATOR!! BUT GOD HAS A CREATOR: HIMSELF!! GLORY AND POWER AND STRENGH BE UNTO GOD.
Hvordanhardudet100 2 months ago
Well, the word unicorn was translated wrong by the writers! the word Unicorn is: re'em: from 7214 Hebrew and chaldean Dictionary that means: A WILD MALE BULL, not a horse or such fairy tails. Unicorns only come to peoples mind when they smoke dope.
Hvordanhardudet100 2 months ago
Good job with the unicon, now refute the other 30 monsters in the bible. Leviathans, those things in rev with the eyes, Behemoths, Satyrs, 7 headed dragons and all sorts of fiery serpents.
aoeuaoeu100 2 months ago
Before the English translations, starting with Tyndale, (who was burned at the stake for creating an English Bible) the Bible was legally available only to clergy in the Catholic Church and was translated into Latin. Variants occur through translation of Greek and Hebrew.
jbinmt 2 months ago
NASB translates this as the "wild ox". The King James version was not the first version in English but the most widely publicized for the masses starting in 1611. Remember that every translation must go back to the original Greek and Hebrew.
jbinmt 2 months ago
@neverfearchrisishere It's referring to the 400 year old Shakespearean era definition, as this is the word used in the KJV, and this is when the KJV was written.
RaptorLlama 2 months ago
* its
MrDannyJFair 2 months ago
very logical, didnt know that there were references to unicorns in the bible (and im a believer) but completely logical
stgredfang 2 months ago
Very interesting video man
Akieth0 2 months ago
Christians got 99 problems and a unicorn ain't one
nitrorev386 2 months ago
CAN I HAZ UNICORN1!!!!?!
Slurrps 2 months ago
Uhmm... sounds legit. Ok, now let's talk about Evolution and the Ark of Noah.
JairUtube 2 months ago 17
@JairUtube Ark of noah problem is already, you just havnt done enough research.
HackerzInc 2 months ago
I'm an atheist and I actually agree with your point in the video. Seems logical to me.
There's a thousand reasons I don't believe in the bible, or God. But a unicorn isn't one of them.
Tyfudd 2 months ago 20
Comment removed
ETWFJ 2 months ago
Comment removed
ETWFJ 2 months ago
im an atheist, but i agree entirely with your message in this video.
you cant use the "unicorn" as an argument for the reasons you showed here.
nice video :)
testwordz 2 months ago
that was awesome!
YoungPhilosopher1 2 months ago
Except you're relying too heavily on the Greek and Latin versions of the Bible, when the Tanakh was written in Hebrew. Rabbis tend to think it was an aurochs, and the modern semitic word "rem," which re'em comes from, means antelope.
hirohiigo 2 months ago
Conclusion? God exists
Robodino1 2 months ago
Rational atheists? Hahaha...
belegulo 2 months ago
Comment removed
nicholaswright2006 2 months ago
Creation Scientists?
That's just awesome :D
ramapcsx2 2 months ago
Great video. That just blew me away.
myron73 2 months ago
Why Does the Bible Mention Unicorns? becouse there once was Unicorns,scripture does not lie nore had any reason to,Im shure they all are just extinct by now just as the tazmanian tiger is now,we are not finding any tazmanian tigar bones now either but we know for a fact they where here.
mystic81006 2 months ago
@mystic81006 And this is the kind of simple reasoning that got us into trouble in the first place.
nicholaswright2006 2 months ago
@nicholaswright2006 Im sorry,I dont follow you?
mystic81006 2 months ago
Awesome video !!!
NubianRockerChick 2 months ago
Excellent work!
2323bful 2 months ago
My son had a dream when he was 5.He says He went up 2Heaven in the arms of Jesus Christ who then put him on His horse, a beautiful white gleaming horse that had a horn on it's head. The angels all sang in the heavens "Glory to God in the highest" while he was there in the dream and then he woke up.I never told him about any white horse,let alone "unicorns" which I thought were mythical.I believe my son had a true encounter with the Living God and was shown something quite special.Time will tell.
jvsm1971 2 months ago
horses have actually had the defect.
AEVautomatic 2 months ago
@AEVautomatic Gonna need a link. lol
nicholaswright2006 2 months ago
Correct should be in PSALM 92,10 Your Horn you are uplifted like in oxen and you anoite me with oil that is to fresh and clean NOWHERE IN THIS VERSE IS UNICORN
mRwhite298 2 months ago
@mRwhite298 King James Version?
nicholaswright2006 2 months ago
Where do you find unicorns in HOLY BIBLE GOD HOLY WORD ---- NOWHERE ----
mRwhite298 2 months ago
@mRwhite298 King James Version.
nicholaswright2006 2 months ago
@nicholaswright2006 In my HOLY SCRIPTURE GOD HOLY WORD i can not find word Unicorn but Rhinos and in dont use King James version Shalom Praise Glory to GOD FATHER SON HOLY SPIRIT i use HOLY SCRIPTURE with GOD HOLY NAME YHWH that is written 7000 Times
mRwhite298 2 months ago
A far more accurate translation into English is the New International Version 1984 edition or the 1978 edition. It can be read free online at biblegateway com But most of you don't want the truth anyway, so spare your ignorant remarks. If you are arfraid to read it, don't claim to know what it says.
gloryboundkev 2 months ago
ignorant peoplel The KJV was intentionally mistranslated by catholicism to get you to not read the Bible. They burned William Tyndale at the stake in 1536 for translating the Bible into English out of the original Hebrew and Greek so that people could read it accurately. Then they declared the Apocrypha as part of the Bible and came up with the KJV. The KJV translated the Hebrew word RAM as unicorn because they want people to believe the priests and not the Bible.
gloryboundkev 2 months ago
Very reasonable. If we can have a similar video giving a coherent explanation for the immaculate conception and resurrection of Jesus, we'll really be getting somewhere.
greylights888 2 months ago
Very well thought out explanation... Informative.
piperadio 2 months ago
I'm not Christian, nor do I believe in the Bible's validity, but this video is a very well executed and adeptly explained analysis of this debate which even I as an atheist can appreciate as being logical. Well done, sir.
PigeonPieProductions 2 months ago
No fossils doesn't prove no existence. Billions upon billions of creatures walked the Earth, do we find billions of fossils? Fossilisation is a very very rare occurence.
krsnakris 3 months ago
You're all wrong. Unicorns are real. I killed one and it's rotting carcass is currently stinking up my garage.
Juggernautcf 3 months ago
@Juggernautcf I Guess you thought it would have been smarter to kill it rather
than sell it to a Zoo and retire off the Cash you woulda got for it.
Nice move...theoretically.
truthseeker9261 2 months ago
ok, you make a compelling argument for the incorrect translation of the bible. If you are correct, then why does it seem that your omnipotent god who inspired men to both write and translate "his words" is seemingly incapable of inspiring those men correctly? Wouldn't an omnipotent god be able to ensure that his own words are written down correctly? Defending yahweh's existence is the same logical fail as defending the existence of Zeus or any other of the thousands of various invented gods.
1000235335 3 months ago
Very informative - well researched and presented, Sir.
sasamuraki 3 months ago
(1/6) Here are two basic assumptions: God is all-knowing, therefore, God must know more than me. Go outside and carefully do a 360 degree spin, focusing on objects in the distance. You will eventually see a limit we call the horizon, the physical end of your vision, relative to your tangent on earth.
Ambelghan 3 months ago
(2/6) In the past, people, who spoke to God on a regular basis, saw this and came to conclusion, or were Told, either way it doesn't matter, that the world was flat; God allowed them to illustrate many versions of this flat earth in his and other books. You'd think with all this knowledge and omnipresence he say,
Ambelghan 3 months ago
(3/6) "hey, this world you're on, tis spherical, not flat... gonna wanna redraw those illustrations. Some jerks in the future are going to point that out occasionally. As if it is some sort of indicator that I only really have a pool of knowledge that is limited by your understanding of reality and that I am nothing more than a figment, and for some of you, a voice in your head. Here to comfort your lack of understanding of the natural world and make you feel important in some way."
Ambelghan 3 months ago
(4/6) But that voice in their head never said that, because, when you have a limited psychosis propagated by a culture or norm (def. religion), you like to keep your claims to what can be definitively provable by what is currently considered natural law. The problem is science, who introduces new concepts, understandings and manipulations of natural law that did not exist during or before Biblical times.
Ambelghan 3 months ago
(5/6) If some desert dwelling nomad who has a 1/100000000000th the understanding of the world as I do said, “Hey you know what, we as human beings, are so small in size in comparison to the earth that the curvature of the earth is perceived, by our limited senses, as a flat plain, but we are really on an orb.”
Ambelghan 3 months ago
@Ambelghan "It is he that sitteth upon the globe of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as locusts: he that stretcheth out the heavens as nothing, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in."
-Isaiah 40:22 (Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition)
It's amazing how one scripture verse refutes 6 comments.
NathanH83 3 months ago
@NathanH83 1899 rendition is amazing, how many times will you people edit, remake, reword and leave out books of the perfect all-powerful Author? Didn't know that God needed an editor, good thing Constantine did. Hey explain how all the genetic diversity that exist in humanity could come about from 2 humans? Scratch that, Adam and Eve weren't humans, Cain is the father of Humanity and he mated with... uh, something to make humans Not mentioned? Plot hole! What ever happened to Lilith?
Ambelghan 3 months ago